The Trump White House is conducting a ‘review’ of the Smithsonian Museum

In late July, we learned that the Smithsonian has scrubbed all references to Donald Trump in their impeachment exhibit. Smithsonian’s curators claimed that it was a temporary issue, but given the Trump administration’s continued interference in museums, libraries, schools and universities, it felt like the tip of the iceberg of authoritarian control over cultural institutions and American history itself. Well, guess what. The Trump White House is now conducting a “review” of the Smithsonian so that the museum will adhere to MAGA lunacy.

The White House plans to conduct a far-reaching review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions, materials and operations ahead of America’s 250th anniversary to ensure the museums align with President Trump’s interpretation of American history. In a letter sent to Lonnie Bunch, the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, three top White House officials said they want to ensure the museums present the “unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story” and reflect the president’s executive order calling for “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”

Areas under scrutiny range from public-facing exhibition text and online content to internal curatorial processes, exhibition planning, the use of collections and artist grants. “This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the president’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,” the letter states.

The letter, dated Tuesday, Aug. 12, and viewed by The Wall Street Journal, was signed by White House senior associate Lindsey Halligan, the director of the domestic policy council, Vince Haley, and the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vought.

The White House review of the Smithsonian’s extensive collection of art and historical artifacts comes as the president has sought to reorient the country’s cultural institutions, including top universities, and demonstrates Trump’s efforts to recast parts of American history in a more positive light. The Smithsonian’s Board of Regents agreed to conduct a thorough review of all its museum and zoo content to eliminate political influence and bias, the Journal previously reported.

Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, said the White House’s effort was an affront to the historians and curators trained to ensure historical accuracy. “If those things are taken out of the hands of historians, the public stands to lose a great deal in having reliable and engaging content that tells a whole and complex story of the American past,” she said.

[From WSJ]

Nothing like a MAGA Review of one of the most important museums in the country, if not the world. As many have noted, we’re already twenty dead canaries into this coal mine, but these stories are the ones which depress me the most. Like…fascist interference and control over the greatest American universities, the greatest American museums, the greatest cultural centerpieces of America. It really is the swiftest decline of an empire.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “The Trump White House is conducting a ‘review’ of the Smithsonian Museum”

  1. Mireille says:

    “…president’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.”
    –Yes, let’s remove all those “divisive” parts of history that threaten the good ol’ boys cub. Slavey, the civil rights movement, Jan.6 and Trump’s impeachment were all taken out of context by liberals. We want to make sure MAGA’s feelings don’t get hurt…especially at institutions that these lowlifes would never visit in the first place.

  2. Lightpurple says:

    I don’t see the Museum of the American Indian or the African-American Museum of History and Culture surviving this “review.”

    I’m also concerned what “curatorial planning” might mean. Book burning appears to be in our immediate future.

    • Blithe says:

      I think that depends on what you mean by “survive”. I think the museums will continue to exist — as unparalleled opportunities to illustrate the fantasies of white supremacy.

    • BeanieBean says:

      First off, are they Smithsonian Institutions? Because if not, they’ll survive this effort (not that trumpists won’t come at them another way). This kind of thing makes me sick to my stomach, as it is my profession–albeit one I decided to pack in after…I dunno, the umpteenth EO and/or stupid email from HR.gov or SECDEF Jaegermeister. Not how I intended to end my professional career, but I couldn’t take these people any more & took the derp (DRP 2.0) with full retirement at the end of September.

      I feel for the professionals sticking it out–likely folks younger than me & just starting their careers or are somewhere in the middle. They don’t get to make the decisions but have to do what their bosses task them with. This is the time for Citizen Saboteurs to step up! Slow walk the changes, say you’re confused & didn’t understand, etc. From the CIA: https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/SimpleSabotage.pdf

      ‘Misunderstand all sorts of regulations….’ And my personal favorite: ‘Cry and sob hysterically at every occasion, especially when confronted by government clerks.’

  3. Vicki says:

    “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” George Orwell, 1984.

  4. Grandma Susan says:

    Our saggy, baggy, ignorant, hate-filled, unqualified lunatic “President”.

  5. Brassy Rebel says:

    This is cognitive dissonance on steroids. On one hand, they claim that the Smithsonian and other museums and keepers of history are partisan and divisive. Otoh, their stated mission is to be more “positive” which demands that exhibits and content erase actual history (things that really happened), resulting in partisan and idealogical narratives being promoted. History is neither positive nor negative. It’s just true.

    • GrnieWnie says:

      It’s the conflation of propaganda and history. Because history has a perspective, necessarily, they think….well, it needs to show MY perspective. My MAGA propaganda perspective.

      Like no, history does actually have to be grounded in facts.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Mmmm, facts are one thing but ‘truth’ is another. History changes over time because historical theory changes hand in hand with society. Example: When my mother was a kid in school, ca. 1940s, she learned that Custer was a hero. Shoot, he was even played by Errol Flynn in a major motion picture (and today we have a different view of him, too). When I was in college some 30 years later, I learned something else entirely (Custer was a racist, homicidal maniac, who wasn’t satisfied in ‘just’ killing Indians he went after their buffalo herds, too, thus going to the very heart of tribal culture for the Plains Indians). Basically, he got what he deserved at Little Big Horn. (Excellent book from the 70s: Custer Died for Your Sins.)
      And that was 50 years ago. I do know there’s been a lot of archaeology conducted at LBH these last several years–in consultation with the Sioux & others–which has been providing an even more-informed history of the events.

      TL;DR: history changes over time BUT blatant right-wing propaganda is NOT history. We are not going back.

  6. Miranda says:

    The Nazis tried this too, particularly with art. Naturally, it only resulted in greater interest in “degenerate” art, and when they held an exhibition of such works at the same time as a show featuring party-sanctioned “racially pure” art, the latter couldn’t attract even half as many visitors. The more you forbid something, or try to hide it away, the more fascinating it becomes.

  7. M says:

    “ensure the museums align with President Trump’s interpretation of American history” So when is someone actually going to call them Nazis? Because this is the Nazi playbook through and through. Everyone is so spineless. I guess we’re gonna have to hope he dies by natural causes before this stops?

    • Blithe says:

      I’m still somewhat optimistic that the destructions won’t be permanent — although they might not be fixable within my lifetime. While it’s affirming to share the rage I feel at this deliberate white washing of history, I’ve often focused on the “again” part of “MAGA”. Trump is old. He fondly and nostalgically remembers when he and his family were applauded for refusing to rent homes to people of color, when racial slurs were popular names for sports teams, and when being wealthy, white, and male meant that even his obvious deficiencies were not enough to put a dent in all the internal and external factors that bolstered his narcissism, and even his focused popularity.

      I’m somewhat worried about the future of the NMAAHC and the NMAI, and I’m more than somewhat concerned about the stresses of this on Lonnie Bunch — whose life of service to the Smithsonian museums has enriched us all. I’ve also spent quite a bit of time in museums that only espoused white male viewpoints, and that paraded those viewpoints as immutable truths. We know better now. Trump can’t destroy every truth — as long as there are those of us who know better. Extra points if we document our own experiences. This is truly, deeply awful. But it’s a truly deeply awful that’s very familiar and very American. We can build and rebuild atop the rubble —although I fervently hope that we won’t need to.

  8. Jennifer Chaos says:

    I grew up as the daughter of a museum director who was a HUGE believer in museum ethics. I am appalled that an institution as respected as The Smithsonian is altering exhibits on the whim of a clearly unhinged cheeto who does not understand the importance not only of history, but it’s impact on the future. People should be able to go to museums to see accurate (or at least attempts at being accurate) depictions of what they are exhibiting. This idiot truly seems to think that because he says it, it is true. This wanna-be emporer is so naked that he no longer has skin. Not everything is a monument to this incompetent administration. We need to start focusing on education, which museums are crucial to. We need to uplift the American people, not step on them. We need to keep arts in schools, all studies show the importance of this. Otherwise we end up with soulless monsters who only worship power and money. Those things don’t make you great. They make you greedy and inhuman. Just my 2 cents.

  9. martha says:

    I just realized that this interference has two objectives: Placing misinformation in the public sphere, but also to undermine public confidence in experts and the idea of experts and replace them with quacks. Belief vs fact.

    History is written by the victors and we’re seeing it play out in real time.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment