Klimt portrait becomes 2nd most expensive artwork, golden toilet gets 1 bidder

Embed from Getty Images
It was a tale of two Sotheby’s auctions in NYC on Tuesday. Up first was Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer by Gustav Klimt, a piece that miraculously eschewed destruction and disappearance after being stolen by the Nazis. The painting was returned to the Lederer family by 1948, where it remained for 35 years until it was sold to makeup heir Leonard A. Lauder, who passed away this year. Sotheby’s expected $10 million $150 million for the painting; instead it sold for $236.4 million, making it the second most expensive artwork ever sold at auction (the most expensive being a da Vinci). Following that record-breaking sale, Sotheby’s switched gears to an item of modern art we’ve covered before: America, by Maurizio Cattelan. As you’ll undoubtedly recall, the “art” is a 216-pound 18-karat gold fully functioning toilet. This piece was also expected to fetch $10 million — at least, they said! Yet when the time came to make the big flush, only one bidder stepped up to the can:

Portrait of a young woman by the artist: The six-foot-tall painting, titled Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer, was painted by the Austrian painter between 1914 and 1916 and shows Lederer, a young heiress and daughter of Klimt’s patrons, draped in a Chinese robe. Six bidders battled for 20 minutes at the Sotheby’s auction on Tuesday night in New York. Sotheby’s declined to identify the successful buyer of the painting. Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer was looted by the Nazis and nearly destroyed in a fire during the second world war, but in 1948 it was returned to Lederer’s brother Erich, who was a frequent subject of drawings and paintings by Klimt’s friend and fellow artist Egon Schiele. It remained in Erich’s possession for most of his life, until he sold it in 1983, two years before his death.

A second act with Lauder: In 1985 the painting became part of the private art collection of Estée Lauder heir Leonard A Lauder, who displayed it in his Fifth Avenue home in New York but for brief periods when it was lent to galleries. Lauder died in June, aged 92. Art historian Emily Braun, who worked as Lauder’s art adviser for nearly four decades, told CNN that the painting was the jewel of his collection. “He ate lunch whenever he was at home, and lunch would be at a little round table right by the painting,” Braun said. The painting was one of two full-length Klimt portraits that remain in private hands.

Figure studies: It was predicted before Tuesday that the Klimt painting would sell for more than $150m (£114m, A$230m). But it smashed expectations to represent more than 40% of the total value of Lauder’s collection, which fetched $575.5m (£437.5m, A$885.7m) with fees. The sale of Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer sets a new record for a Klimt painting at auction, surpassing the $108m record set by the sale of Lady with a Fan in 2023. … The most expensive artwork ever sold at auction was Salvator Mundi by Leonardo da Vinci, which sold in 2017 for US$450.3m.

Modern art is in the toilet: The 101kg, 18-karat-gold toilet, titled America, was made by Maurizio Cattelan, the provocative Italian artist known for taping a banana to a wall and selling it for $5.2m. But on Tuesday, his gold toilet received only a single bid that met the asking price of $10m, or $12.1m with fees. Cattelan created two solid gold toilets in 2016. The other was displayed in 2016 at New York’s Guggenheim Museum, which pointedly offered to lend it to US president Donald Trump when he asked to borrow a Van Gogh painting. … Cattelan has said that his gold toilets satirise superwealth, once saying: “Whatever you eat, a $200 lunch or a $2 hot dog, the results are the same, toilet-wise.”

[From The Guardian]

A Klimt broke records while a shiny gold toilet couldn’t draw more than one interested party? You guys, my old fashioned heart loves this! It’s craft winning over a gimmick, talent over stunt. I’m sure Cattelan is a gas to have at a party, but speaking for myself, I could do with fewer bananas and toilets in fine art. And speaking of ridiculous sentences, that comment from Lauder’s art adviser Emily Braun had me in stitches. “He ate lunch whenever he was at home, and lunch would be at a little round table right by the painting.” WTF kind of a statement is that?! It says nothing about the actual work of art itself, except possibly the inference that it was a good background for digestion. And why was Leonard only eating lunch at home?? I’d question Braun’s credentials, but she demonstrated her expertise in a recent interview with CNN. Anyway, congrats on the impressive purchase to the mystery bidder; hopefully Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer will be made available for the public to enjoy. In the meantime, we still have access to toilets.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

photos via Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain and credit Getty

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

21 Responses to “Klimt portrait becomes 2nd most expensive artwork, golden toilet gets 1 bidder”

  1. Jezz says:

    My old fashioned heart agrees, but is grossed out by these prices!

  2. Jessa says:

    ae those numbers right – should it be anticipated to sell for $100m based on the GBP/AUD conversions?

  3. ThatGirlThere says:

    Now if my funds were limitless and I was donating like Mackenzie Scott does, I would consider splurging on this gorgeous piece for sure.

    I think I’m going to buy this poster though…

  4. Inge says:

    I thought that it is disputed that the most expensive painting is actually by Da Vinci?

    Also these prices seem ridiculous but would paintings owned by museums be worth, such as Starry Night, Mona Lisa, Girl With A Pearl Earring etc

  5. lucy2 says:

    That’s insane money.

  6. Nanny to the Rescue says:

    Wait, if the toilet is pure gold, 101 kg of it… Does that mean the buyer basicly just got 100 kg of gold roughly at the normal price of material, or even saved money on it? What does that say about the “art”?

  7. M says:

    No one should have so much personal wealth that they can pay a quarter of a billion for a painting. Eat the rich.

  8. Mina_Esq says:

    I don’t know why they underestimated so badly when the last Klimt that Sotherby’s auctioned also smashed all expectations. His paintings are beautiful. I visit the gallery at Belvedere every time I go back to Vienna.

    • Lightpurple says:

      Photographs and prints can never do his works justice; there’s so much depth in his technique and the colors shimmer and glow. Photography just flattens them out.

      I can spend hours in the Belvedere just staring, and it’s not that big a place

  9. MaisiesMom says:

    I saw this on the news. Gorgeous painting. Insane price. Glad it beat the toilet by a mile though. Who besides Trump wants a gold toilet?

    There was a movie about another portrait he did, I believe “The Woman In Gold,” with Helen Mirren as the niece of the subject/owner trying to get it back decades after the Holocaust. I think the Austrian government had it in a museum, and part of the central conflict was them claiming it as part of their Austrian heritage (and Klimt as an Austrian artist) while Helen’s side was like “actually that’s my aunt and it was our private property that was stolen by Nazis.”

    I could be wrong but I believe that one was also eventually purchased by the Lauders? And is in a museum somewhere or at least available for display, as it should be. About to go down a rabbit hole……

    • knotkaren says:

      The other Klimt work, Portrait of Adele Bloch Bauer is “The Woman in Gold.” It is part of the (Ronald) Lauder collection.

      • windyriver says:

        Believe this is the one which can be seen at the Neue Galerie museum in NYC, which Lauder helped create.

  10. Kirsten says:

    It’s a stunning painting. I hope whomever purchased it considers at least occasionally loaning it to a museum for display.

  11. Calliope says:

    It’s a beautiful painting with a spectacular provenance. I hope whoever bought it continues to loan it out to museums.

    (I thought the comment was sort of cute? That the previous owner really loved/appreciated it. Or, at least, that’s what I’m hoping rather than “look at me and my immense wealth that this painting is my lunch companion.”)

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment