Time Magazine’s 2025 Persons of the Year are the ‘architects of AI’- boooo

AI has become a chicken/egg dilemma for me. What came first, stupid people who needed AI to do their work for them, or did AI make people dumber? Beyond the Terminator-esque “rise of the machines” aspect of all of this, the economics of AI make little sense to me, and it feels like one big scam. But I guess no one can deny that 2025 was the year where AI was suddenly everywhere and the biggest hot-button conversation. As such, Time Magazine made “the architects of AI” their Person of the Year. The opening to the POTY story reads like satire:

Jensen Huang needs a moment. The CEO of Nvidia enters a cavernous ­studio at the company’s Bay Area headquarters and hunches over a table, his head bowed.

At 62, the world’s eighth richest man is compact, polished, and known among colleagues for his quick temper as well as his visionary leadership. Right now, he looks exhausted. As he stands silently, it’s hard to know if he’s about to erupt or collapse.

Then someone puts on a Spotify playlist and the stirring chords of Aerosmith’s “Dream On” fill the room. Huang puts on his trademark black leather jacket and appears to transform, donning not just the uniform, but also the body language and optimism befitting one of the foremost leaders of the artificial intelligence revolution.

Still, he’s got to be tired. Not too long ago, the former engineer ran a successful but semi-obscure outfit that specialized in graphics processors for video games. Today, Nvidia is the most valuable company in the world, thanks to a near-monopoly on the advanced chips powering an AI boom that is transforming the planet. Memes depict Nvidia as Atlas, holding the stock market on its shoulders. More than just a corporate juggernaut, Nvidia also has become an instrument of statecraft, operating at the nexus of advanced technology, diplomacy, and geopolitics. “You’re taking over the world, Jensen,” President Donald Trump, now a regular late-night phone buddy, told Huang during a recent state visit to the United Kingdom.

[From Time]

I still believe that other billionaires/tech guys saw what Elon Musk did last year and it was a light-bulb moment for them: oh, we could manipulate Donald Trump too, we could ingratiate ourselves with these morons and clear the path to get everything we want. And that’s just what they did.

Within the cover story, Huang tells Time: “Every industry needs it, every company uses it, and every nation needs to build it. This is the single most impactful technology of our time.” Bitch, it’s not the space race. It’s not nuclear proliferation! You’re not even making Peanut Butter M&Ms, calm down. Every industry does NOT need it, every company should NOT use it, and few nations have a need for it.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, covers courtesy of Time.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “Time Magazine’s 2025 Persons of the Year are the ‘architects of AI’- boooo”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Who were these people says:

    Positioning those greedy ghouls on the iconic photo of construction workers is insulting and the opposite of clever.

    • bisynaptic says:

      🎯

    • Tate says:

      It’s repulsive

    • SIde Eye says:

      You are so right! It’s by design. Juxtapose this against a huge part of the workforce being deported for racism and cruelty and the fact that the rest of the workforce will eventually be replaced by AI. It drives me crazy when I need to reach a company and some AI assistant keeps repeating prompts to me I didn’t need or want. I have to ask for a live person 10 times before I am finally connected to one. Some things you cannot replace. I love when I call a business and an actual person answers the phone immediately. I try as much as possible not to use the self checkout. I just want to go back to 1992.

      We had opportunities to stop this and didn’t. In another timeline/galaxy/world people will listen to Black people instead of gaslighting us and dismissing us as alarmists when we try to warn everyone.

  2. Sue says:

    I feel like all these “of the year” picks are just for click-bait/rage-bait. This, the panettone color, the dictionary literally choosing the word rage-bait.

  3. Chaine says:

    Somebody should make an AI video of King Kong lumbering over and flipping all of these greedy soulless human husks off the girder.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    Time Magazine has jumped the shark with this pick.

  5. bisynaptic says:

    I wonder who the person of the year will be, when the AI bubble bursts.

  6. Jay says:

    That first cover is unintentionally perfect in all of it’s wretched photoshopped glory: weird proportions/angles, working class cosplay, and even managing to marginalize one of only two women by squishing her right at edge of the page. It’s AI in a nutshell!

    I’m glad that they put faces to it – we should know what these monsters look like.

  7. Brassy Rebel says:

    Are they really people or just AI? The Person of the Year should be Mackenzie Scott. Aldous Huxley warned us.

  8. Tara says:

    Quoted from instagram:

    “Shit named poop of the year by ass”

  9. schmootc says:

    I think the chicken and the egg are simultaneous. My ex-boss used AI for everything. I don’t think the guy could write a complete sentence by himself. And AI is also making everyone dumber. I can see the allure of AI, but try to avoid it using it myself.

  10. Veronica S. says:

    Fitting that the architects of AI would be poorly substituted on an iconic photo of actual laborers – since that is, actually, what AI is at its core. It’s millions, if not billions, of hours of human labor and art taken and made proprietary in what will likely be recognized later as the greatest labor theft of all time.

    The sad part is…it could be worthwhile to us all of it was required to be public domain. But it’s not, of course, despite being built on public work. So we all get to have our own work regurgitated back at us even in increasingly garbage reiterations of what we’ve seen before with the added bonus of seeing no recognition for it AND environmental destruction.

  11. martha says:

    I believe the creator of this cover art did the “bad photoshop” effect on purpose. He’s an illustrator whose work has been used without permission by some AI-generator programs and he’s angry about it. Getting relief by legal means is difficult because it’s not easy to target who to sue.

    Here’s YouTube clip from a local DC news station report done 3 months ago, interviewing the artist + also a copyright lawyer:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU9_9sspuPM