Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post laid off 30% of all of their employees

Last week, Jeff Bezos and his wife Lauren Sanchez went to the Schiaparelli show at Paris Fashion Week. They’ve somewhat successfully infiltrated these elite cultural spaces, mostly by buying their way into cultural access. They are patrons of this year’s Met Gala as well, and Lauren really, really wants to be a fashionista and accepted in Vogue/Anna Wintour circles. Anyway, as they arrived at PFW, there were widespread rumors in the media world that the Bezos-owned Washington Post would soon begin laying off a good percentage of their staff. Well, after Jeff and Lauren paid people to kiss their asses in Paris, Jeff returned stateside and began ripping apart the Post.

The Washington Post told employees on Wednesday that it was beginning a widespread round of layoffs that are expected to decimate the organization’s sports, local news and international coverage. The company is laying off about 30 percent of all its employees, according to two people with knowledge of the decision. That includes people on the business side and more than 300 of the roughly 800 journalists in the newsroom, the people said.

The cuts are a sign that Jeff Bezos, who became one of the world’s richest people by selling things on the internet, has not yet figured out how to build and maintain a profitable publication on the internet. The paper expanded during the first several years of his ownership, but the company has sputtered more recently.

Matt Murray, The Post’s executive editor, said on a call Wednesday morning with newsroom employees that the company had lost too much money for too long and had not been meeting readers’ needs. He said that all sections would be affected in some way, and that the result would be a publication focused even more on national news and politics, as well as business and health, and far less on other areas.

“If anything, today is about positioning ourselves to become more essential to people’s lives in what is becoming a more crowded, competitive and complicated media landscape,” Mr. Murray said. “And after some years when, candidly, The Post has had struggles.”

Mr. Murray further explained the rationale in an email, saying The Post was “too rooted in a different era, when we were a dominant, local print product” and that online search traffic, partly because of the rise of generative A.I., had fallen by nearly half in the last three years. He added that The Post’s “daily story output has substantially fallen in the last five years.”

“Even as we produce much excellent work, we too often write from one perspective, for one slice of the audience,” he said.

The Post’s sports section will close, though some of its reporters will stay on and move to the features department to cover the culture of sports. The Post’s metro section will shrink, and the books section will close, as will the “Post Reports” daily news podcast. Mr. Murray told the staff that while The Post’s international coverage also would be reduced, reporters would remain in nearly a dozen locations. Reporters and editors in the Middle East were laid off, as well as in India and Australia.

Peter Finn, the section’s editor, requested that he be laid off rather than be involved in planning the cuts once he learned about their scope, according to two people with knowledge of his decision.

[From The NY Times]

Here are the sections with the biggest damage: the book/publishing section; all international bureaus; photojournalism (apparently all or most of the WaPo photographers were fired?); sports and a “restructuring” of the Metro section. The Post apparently doesn’t think there’s any need for sports coverage just days before the start of the Winter Olympics AND the Super Bowl. And just months away from the US co-hosting the World Cup?? There were WaPo journalists in active warzones (like Ukraine) who got fired via text on Wednesday morning.

As for why all of this is happening, it’s no big secret if you were paying attention in 2023 and 2024. Late 2023 was when Bezos brought in Will Lewis as the new publisher of the Post. Lewis is British, and his background was primarily in the Rupert Murdoch-owned British publications. Lewis was up to his ass in ALL of the British media’s hacking/blagging issues. But Lewis was brought in specifically to try to push WaPo into more conservative, pro-Trump political coverage. On that, Lewis was explicitly doing Jeff Bezos’ bidding. When Bezos and Lewis pulled the Post’s presidential endorsement of Kamala Harris in 2024, the sh-t hit the fan. They saw a mass exodus of subscribers and readers. Instead of Bezos and Lewis blaming themselves for their own sh-tty decision-making at all levels, they blamed the Post’s journalists and editors for not being Trumpy enough to entice a new readership.

Also: Bezos is a billionaire who could easily run WaPo at a loss for decades to come and it would make no noticeable impact on his wealth. After all, this is a man who just wasted $100 million on Melania Trump’s documentary, which bombed completely. Hell is not hot enough for Jeff Bezos.


.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post laid off 30% of all of their employees”

  1. ThatGirlThere says:

    What a fucking loser. When he is dead all he will be known for is ruining the Washington Post and his big booed wife. What disgrace.

    • manda says:

      It’s just so shocking to me that someone could have so much money like that and not be tempted in the least to help out the country that allowed them reach that success. Like, fund a hospital, why don’t you? It would be a drop in the bucket and have a much more lasting impact on the world. Selfishly, it would make them look good. Don’t they care about that?

      • Kitten says:

        No. I don’t want any more billionaires funding anything for PR purposes, to rehab their image, or to control yet more sectors of our society. They already yield far too much influence. Our government has plenty of money to fund things like hospitals and they should be funding them 100% instead of relying on donations from us, private businesses and health insurance companies.

        The billionaire class can keep their dirty money because that’s the closest we will get to harm reduction with these greedy assholes.

      • manda says:

        well, the government isn’t funding things that are needed. I feel like I hear about hospitals closing in rural areas all the time. And I didn’t mean for PR purposes. I meant just because they can, just because they have the money. Just because it would be nothing to them and it would be good. Like that’s what I don’t understand. It would be so easy to do so much, and like, none of them do anything, except for I guess Mackenzie Scott

      • Kitten says:

        First, if we taxed billionaires at the same rate we tax middle class Americans the government would have more than enough money to fund every single hospital from Boston to Kalamazoo and an easy way to pay for universal healthcare. Second, billionaires and private equity HAVE been buying up hospitals and private practices for years now and all that happens is reduced care quality as they lay off staff and prioritize profit over patient care. They are quite literally shaping the healthcare industry. When you say rural hospitals are closing, guess why? Because billionaires are targeting hospital funding through political efforts (hello Elon Musk) and lobbying to cut to Medicaid and Medicare which in turn jeopardizes hospitals serving low-income patients often in rural areas.

        People have GOT to get away from this fantasy that the billionaires are gonna save us. They won’t. Even their philanthropic donations that may help some of us, are still a net benefit for them financially and image-wise. The only way billionaires can collectively benefit our society is through tax revenue that we should be collecting on them but won’t because of Trump’s signature bill.

        EAT THE RICH.

    • Mac says:

      He had to pay $75 million for Melania because bribes are more effective than reporting the truth.

    • Denise says:

      Apparently they had a journalist in the middle of the war zone in Ukraine who was just told she’s laid off. She tweeted that she’s in an area with no heating, water nor electricity and was told that her services are not needed anymore.

  2. Brassy Rebel says:

    He knows that with all his 💰 people like Anna Wintour will continue to suck up to him. And he is already rewriting history by ignoring the fact that he and Will Lewis killed the Post while blaming it’s great journalists. If he truly cared about journalism, he can afford to build up the Washington Post instead of tearing it down.

  3. manda says:

    I live in a suburb of DC. My husband and I grew up in families that got a paper. I moved to this area in 2000 and loved reading the Post. My husband and I got a subscription in like 2004, and even after online news became big, we have still gotten the paper because actual distribution of papers is important for papers (which is likely why the Post started making that free express one for the metro, which I loved reading when I had to go downtown). Papers are good for stuff, like eating crabs in the summer or putting down when you paint, otherwise we recycle them. We have stuck with it even after Bezos bought it, even after the editorial board wrote too many op-eds blaming the dems for the shutdown. But I guess it’s over. It’s really such a shame. I told my husband I had really have always wanted to support the paper, to support journalism, but it’s not worth it now because all it’s doing is putting more money in his pocket.

  4. Aimee says:

    Katherine Graham is rolling in her grave.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    I was going to say the same thing. For the sake of journalism, Bezos can afford to run WaPo at a loss but he refuses. Not only did he waste money with the Melania doc, but also with the “space” programme that doesn’t really go to space. I’m guessing that there will still be some sort of sports section but they will just use reports from the news agencies like AP and Reuters instead of having their own sports reporters.

  6. FYI says:

    I cancelled my subscription to WaPo a while ago. It is really a tragedy what he did to that paper.

    I am now trying to find workarounds so that I can quit Amazon. That’s the only way to stop people like him — stop giving them money. It’s hard to stomach that I myself have helped pay for her plastic surgery, his yachts, etc. But it is true. I gotta look at my own responsibility.

  7. YankeeDoodles says:

    Agreed, re: Katherine Graham. However there is a caveat: Graham was a power broker who used her influence to nudge the country in the direction that she and her networked circle thought best. They had an agenda. That included getting rid of Nixon (brilliant) & supporting Reagan (not so great, in fact) ….& supporting Clinton (throwing good money after bad, if you trace a line from Nixon revoking the gold standard in ‘71-‘73 to Reagan’s horrid budget deficits to the revocation of the Glass-Steagall Act under Clinton) …all of which, cumulatively, failed to generate a grounded national debate about the way we sustain overseas commitments in balance with domestic investment. And that failure opened the way to all kinds of collateral damage. A lot of Americans have been casualties of this failure to chart a course. It’s ironic, now, that her paper has become another casualty. But fundamentally Graham & her circle were a benign oligarchy & much of their agenda was financial. It’s a morally relative world, as far as Bezos is concerned. He’s just found a better way to make money. And that makes him acceptable to many in American society.

  8. D says:

    The only way these oligarchs will suffer any ramifications for what they are doing to our country is by changing our consumption habits. I had already cancelled my post subscription after the Kamala debacle but I’ve now stopped shopping at Whole Foods (which I did several times a week) and have told my family that we aren’t renewing Prime. We will keep basic Amazon because we have tons of books on Kindle and would lose access if we cancelled but we won’t be using them to buy anything anymore. I told my family that we may find it challenging and inconvenient at first but if we don’t make changes because it’s a little uncomfortable then we are as much to blame about what is happening as a M-ga. Silent complicity is how Germany fell in the 30s and 40s. Our greatest weapons are our wallets right now. As soon as they lose money and stock prices go down they will have to course correct. Unfortunately they are all devoid of morals so trying to appeal to their greater good won’t work.

    • DaveW says:

      Same. I canceled Prime a year ago and don’t miss it 99% of the time, like you did keep the basic Kindle. Whole Foods is my most convenient grocery store but between Amazon owning and having to fight the aisles with the online order shoppers switched to a local grocer that also has far better produce, bakery and prepared foods.

      Washington Post I also gave up and switched to the Boston Globe, which is also local for me anyway. I do miss the WaPo real estate section as I loved when they featured Georgetown/DuPont etc homes for sale.

      And just me, or does Bezos look more and more like Dr Evil every passing day? Also, for all her surgery, his wife gets less attractive and try as she might, those expensive couture clothes never look like, well, expensive couture.

      • D says:

        As soon as he stops the Ozempic he’ll look exactly like Dr. Evil!

        I switched to the regular AP site and The Guardian but the Globe is great for local Boston. I am a NY suburb and all of our papers suck but I do still do the Times games section. It’s fascinating what news will be front and center on the Guardian US site but nowhere on the NYTimes site. They are really editing what they let their readers see.

  9. Kitten says:

    This latest move shows Bezos’s true contempt for what once was a storied institution and the free press in general. Billionaires traditionally love a good financial loss for tax purposes and the fact that he’s at the point where he’d rather kill the thing entirely than continue to operate at a loss is very, very telling and TBH chilling.

  10. lorent says:

    I subscribed to the Post since I moved to the DC area in 1988 (yes, I’m old). The paper was a pillar of news reporting in this country. I can’t believe Bezos has destroyed it so completely. I unsubscribed a few months ago, but since I paid on a yearly basis, I still have access until April. But I’ve stopped clicking on any articles, and I’m slowly unsubscribing from their emails.

    Bezos did to the Post what Trump is doing to the country, doing lasting, long-term and possibly permanent damage.

  11. Trillion says:

    With this and the recent Amazon layoffs, remind me again why we give such generous tax breaks to billionaires because they’re “job creators”.

    • DaveW says:

      Because for some reason people keep believing politicians when they talk about how amazingly beneficial “trickle down economics” is for the middle class. It’s been decades and it’s NOT the middle class reaping the rewards.

  12. MaisiesMom says:

    I didn’t know the new head Will Lewis was British. No offense to the Brits on Celebitchy, but why are there so many people from across the pond in American journalism? This has been the case for years, decades even. It seems to have become a more pronounced trend recently, but maybe it’s just been flying under the radar. Is it the Murdoch effect? That what it seems like in this case.

    There is some kind of nefarious Anglo-American coalition working to remake our shared world into their personal Tory/Conservative hellscape. Is it just happening here, or is it over there too? I really am curious.

  13. ChillinginDC says:

    It’s so upsetting because at this point, I don’t mess with Amazon unless I have to, but I rather buy local and drive to get what I need. I also don’t get books from them and at this point. I also don’t really get why so many celebs are hanging out with Bezos when this man hates anyone not rich. He and his wife are terrible people and I wish that he would sell the WP. It’s also been noted they canned mostly POC and women the other day. Them thinking that the US is secretly conservative should have been laid to rest when we had the elections in November, the special elections, and oh yeah, everyone coming out against ICE. He and Bari Weiss are a mess.

  14. North of Boston says:

    Cancelled my post subscription in 2024 after Bezos pulled the presidential endorsement and issued that awful self-serving ‘explanation’.
    And tried to cancel Amazon Prime at the same time, but for some reason, they didn’t process it and kept it active, autobilled a renewal without notice (even though I had both ‘do not auto renew’ and notify options selected on my account.

    But I’ve purposely only made one or two amazon purchases since Nov 2024 < $50
    vs the dozens I used to every year. And I cut off spending with any affiliates – eg Zappo's, Fulfillment By Amazon vendors.
    I'm done willingly putting money in that AH greedy anti-democracy, orange-A-kissing oligarch's pocket.

    He and Lewis showed their intentions years ago. Shame on them, and every politician who gave away the store in tax breaks to Bezos.

  15. ElsaBug says:

    On the same day, the Editorial Board wrote a criminally uncritical view of ICE actions: “Since the surge began in Minnesota, Homan says agents have apprehended 14 people who had been convicted of homicide, 139 with assault convictions, 87 sex offenders and 28 gang members. It isn’t clear how many of these criminals were handed over by law enforcement or captured in the streets, but even one released murderer is one too many.” How about even one death by federal agents is too many?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment