Telegraph: The Windsors will be used as ‘The Trump Whisperers’ this year

In the past seven days, Donald Trump launched an authorized and poorly-planned war against Iran, accidentally killed the next Iranians in line to be ayatollah, refused to make plans to evacuate Americans or American embassies in the region, caused a huge spike in crude oil prices, threatened that Cuba is next on his invasion agenda, demanded that he be part of Iran’s process to elect the next ayatollah, threatened Spain because they wouldn’t let him use their military bases, and finally, mocked Keir Starmer and the British government. It’s been insanity from start to finish and I’m leaving off like twenty major events that happened in the past week. Well, one of Trump’s few constants is his love of shiny objects and royalty. As such, the Brits are desperate to “use” the Windsors to repair the US-UK “special relationship.” Some highlights from the Telegraph:

The Trump Whisperers: The Royal family has acquired a nickname in diplomatic circles: the Trump whisperers. The last state visit – and those that preceded it – was so successful that there is a theory Donald Trump would prefer to deal with the Windsors over any British politician. For that reason, they are to be deployed again – in the nick of time – with the war on Iran having seemingly stretched the so-called special relationship to breaking point. Politically, it is close to an emergency.

Why Trump is mad at Starmer: Despite No 10’s eventual decision to allow the US to use RAF bases for “limited defensive” strikes on Iran, the White House remains furious that Mr Trump’s request was initially refused. Diplomats in Washington have since scrambled to resolve the situation, but the UK’s decision to replace Lord Mandelson as the US ambassador has hampered their efforts.

King Charles’s state visit to the US in April: The King and Queen are already pencilled in to visit America at the end of April. The trip has not yet been confirmed, palace sources emphasise, and is a “matter for government”. Nevertheless, it is expected to go ahead. It will be tied to the 250th anniversary of American independence, with the King following in his late mother’s footsteps. Officials in Washington are hoping that another state visit – following the King’s hosting duties in Windsor last year – will smooth transatlantic tensions, which had been bubbling under the surface for months. The special relationship now is at an “all-time low”, one source familiar with negotiations over the potential visit admitted. “The royal visit can’t come quickly enough,” they said. “If they could bring it forward, they would,” a government source said. “There is no other way” to reset the UK-US relationship, warns another.

The other royal trip to the US: The Prince and Princess of Wales could make a second royal trip in July. It would be a blockbuster event. The Princess has not travelled overseas in an official capacity since before her illness, and the White House is understood to be very keen for them to visit. Sources point to the example of the famous “John Travolta moment” in 1985 in which Diana, then Princess of Wales, danced with the actor at the White House. Should her son and his wife stage a photocall of similar impact, it would represent a coup for their potential hosts. The president requested to sit next to Catherine at the Windsor Castle state banquet, it is said. He was “bowled over” by the hospitality, leaving full of ideas for the White House décor and asking for details about the golden carriages the Royal family has at their disposal for such diplomatic duties. “He wants to be as royal as the royals,” says one critic.

Keen royal statesmanship: There is a view to the future behind the potential visit, too, with the Prince and Princess of Wales being the monarchy’s next generation. “It’s not just about the glitz and glamour,” says a source. “It’s about building a deep, enduring relationship [with the US] that will last for decades.” That relationship, the source added, helps British governments through difficult patches. Which is another reason, supporters of the Royal family would say, not to pursue the idea of stripping back the pomp and ceremony of monarchy to resemble the style of the European “bicycling royals”.

[From The Telegraph]

My political/royal analysis is that the Starmer government is playing this the wrong way. Starmer knows that Trump only really gives a sh-t about the optics and the royals. Use the threat of “maybe we’ll cancel Charles’s visit” or “maybe William and Kate will be unavailable after all” to get what they need out of Trump and get Trump to change his tune. If Starmer doesn’t know by now that Trump is a blustering buffoon with profound dementia, then what’s the point of any of this? I’d also like to point out that there’s an undercover acknowledgement that Trump would be less than thrilled if William came to the US solo, without his wife. As in, no one would actually pay attention to William’s visit if he didn’t bring Kate.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

29 Responses to “Telegraph: The Windsors will be used as ‘The Trump Whisperers’ this year”

  1. Henny Penny says:

    Duh. Don wants to be a King, so of course he would feel like he should only have to talk to the other Kings. The Windsors have been aiding and abetting one of Trump’s most famous criminal accomplices for decades. I’ve never seen Kate more thrilled than she was sitting next to Donald Trump, and which other woman head of state or first lady has she taken out into the woods to play with children (WTF?! Melanie should not be allowed around ANY children!)) William also looked more relaxed and cordial with Don than with anyone else I remember.

    They aren’t Trump Whisperers. They are part of it.

  2. Blujfly says:

    Like two weeks after Trump left the state visit he reversed some negotiated economic deal to lift tariffs and put worse tariffs in place or something. This is the Telegraph supporting Trump and beating up on Starmer and embiggening these losers.

    • Mac says:

      I refuse to believe this article isn’t from The Onion.

      • Calliope says:

        Seriously. “He’s literally blown up all agreements and norms and laws and attacked our country but *we’ll* be different and special this time even though his own country is starting to hate his guts (again). We have excellent instincts.”

  3. Where'sMyTiara says:

    Keir Starmer: Neville Chamberlain 2.0.

    Also a rota hoped-for repeat of royal stardust to equal Diana at the WH is never going to happen.

    Not with Cluck and Cloppy, nor with Huevo and Huesa.

    Forget fab four, they’re four black holes of charisma.

    Not that the Trumps would notice…

  4. Julia says:

    It won’t make any difference to UK/US relations. No matter how well the trip goes as soon as it is over Trump will be back to his changeable ways. So far all the fawning has got the UK nothing. As for a potential William and Kate trip, Kate is not Diana, it will not be a blockbuster. William and Kate have been married since 2011, if they haven’t had a blockbuster’ moment yet they never will! Keep dreaming Telegraph. Remember when they told us the Boston trip would unleash Beatle mania and they got booed at the basketball?

  5. Peke says:

    “Future King Thinks He’s Playing Chess, Is Actually Pawn” should be a plot for Game of Thrones rather than an accurate summary description of two decaying nations’ diplomatic relations while nuclear war is back on the table for the first time in decades.

  6. Mightymolly says:

    The photo of Kate and Melania is *chills*. Serena Joy’s dumber, less ethical cousins.

  7. Brassy Rebel says:

    I am never not shocked that after all that Trump has done, after all the chaos, division, and lying, there are still people in this mad world who think they can influence and manipulate this demented lunatic. The royals can fellate Trump all they or Starmer’s failed government may want, but Trump is still going to be Trump, an unreliable, narcissistic sociopath. Stop trying to appease him! Ffs.

  8. Jais says:

    All I know is that Kate will not be happy if she has to work in July. Although she didn’t seem to mind Trump’s attention in the uk.

  9. Tessa says:

    Keen is no Diana and will never be another diana.

  10. Amy Bee says:

    These articles are written to give the Royal Family greater importance than they actyally have. They have no impact on US-UK relations.

  11. Krista says:

    Sure

  12. Shiela Kerr says:

    The Windsor’s will get all the pomp and circumstance’s that come from this sort of visit. In the end they will have succeeded in making fools’s on themselves.

  13. BeanieBean says:

    All those could & woulds & ifs in that paragraph about Kate & Willam! Geez Louise! Fantasy fiction!

    And it cracks me up! They talk about ‘building a lasting relationship’ as though the two countries had never met before!!! They did the same when Billy Boy visited Saudi Arabia. As though the Brits hadn’t been traveling to Saudi for their bags of cash for generations already.

  14. Nerd says:

    So am I understanding this correctly that they were so successful that the relationship is now “at an all time low” after they kissed his rear end at a state banquet that was less than six months ago? Yet these two trips to the U.S. are supposed to be so successful that they will build “deep, enduring relationships (with the U.S.) that will last decades”? One state visit with dementia Don didn’t last half a year, but two will last decades. Okay 👌 🤣.

  15. LRB says:

    They lost me when they said Kate could produce a Diana moment – the beautiful Diana dancing in that stunning gown with John Travolta – not going to happen. And it makes me sad – I still miss Diana.

  16. Bckett says:

    I had to fill my car a couple of days ago. The cost per gallon (converted from € per liter) had increased from $5.81 to $7.60 in 24 hours. I usually spend 50€ to fill the tank. This time, I had to spend 60€.
    I checked again this morning, and the price has gone up again, so I suppose I was lucky… in a way…
    Thank you Demented Orange Peel!

  17. Calliope says:

    Appeasing him means you’re weak and he’ll keep attacking you. Be strong, stand up – he backs down. He’s a delusional psychopath; there’s no appeasement. They have no idea what they’re doing – it’s only money and power and destroying others.

    I’m a bit amused that they’re saying the ambassador pick was actually not bad. “Yes he’s vile and in the Epstein Files and shared classified info – but that’s who the felon is! They were speaking the same language.”

    The Epstein class keeps together. No discussion that maybe it’s best not to be seen with the star of the files? Best not to be seen with a war criminal? No bets on how many countries he’ll have bombed and destroyed by July?

  18. TN Democrat says:

    The visits should be canceled. Stop playing with Putin’s puppet. Nothing he says can be trusted. Strengthen the alliances with Europe and the Commonwealth. The royals visiting during this catastrophic shitshow is a slap in the face to Canada, Denmark/Europe and every other country being f#cked over by the magat regime.

  19. MaisiesMom says:

    And here I thought Marco Rubio was the Trump Whisperer.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment