What’s the point of WSJ’s article about Prince Harry & Prince William’s rift?

During and after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s humanitarian trip to Jordan, we watched Prince William have a massive crashout, all of which was documented by the American and British tabloids. Over the weekend, Prince Harry and Meghan’s office confirmed an upcoming trip to Australia, a British/commonwealth realm. I knew we were in store for many tantrums from “palace sources” and “royal insiders.” But I didn’t expect it to come via the Wall Street Journal, in a pseudo-elevated piece called “Harry, William and the Royal Rift That Won’t Heal.” It’s a long read, with the bulk of the sourcing coming from royalists and people in Prince William’s camp. It reminds me a bit of the infamous “The Other Brother” Times cover story several years back, with sources swearing up and down that people love William’s awkward, uncomfortable, angry energy and “sources” layering in complaints and lies about Harry. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:

Harry’s Montecito struggles: While William’s future appears more predictable than ever, Harry, a man who grew up in Kensington Palace and remains fifth in line to the British throne, today lives far from Britain, literally and figuratively. Recent business ventures have struggled, the Hollywood production deals that initially subsidized his exit are drying up, and his nonprofit arm laid off much of its staff shortly before Christmas. Those who know Harry describe him as happily settled into family life in Montecito, continuing to advocate for the causes he cares about, and often starting his day as his older brother does: with school drop-off. But some who have spent time with him in recent months have also found him adrift and isolated, with Meghan chasing new pursuits as he passes the time in his sleepy new hometown.

The brothers’ rift: King Charles entertains calls from Harry, and vice versa, but William has cut ties with his brother as he sketches out plans for a reign free of the kind of familial blowups—from Uncle Andrew on down—that have tainted the Windsor brand over the past four decades. William, 43 years old, and Harry, 41, haven’t spoken in years, and it’s unlikely they will ever fully make up, according to colleagues, friends and associates of both men. “The prospects of reconciliation are pretty remote,” says Sally Bedell Smith, who has written several royal biographies. “There are just so many wounding and damaging revelations.”

The Sussexes might get their security back in the UK: The culmination of the prince’s various legal battles with the press could also smooth the way for father and son to be publicly reconciled at an Invictus Games event for wounded servicemen in 2027, aides say.

Banquo’s Ghost: Still, the more Harry struggles to forge a new existence, the more he appears to be refocusing on what he knows best: riffing on his own persona of the amiable, accessible royal, undertaking pseudo-royal visits to draw attention to good deeds across the globe. When William comes to the throne, Harry will always be in the background, a foil, a potential distraction and a constant reminder of a regal brotherly duo that could have been. In a royal life already marked by tragedy, this latest act could cast Harry in an appropriately Shakespearean role, a Banquo’s ghost at Prince William’s table.

William’s privacy: For William, Spare was a gut punch, people who know him say. Not only did it damage the family brand in his view, it severed a bond of trust between the brothers. Spare painted William as the hotheaded older brother who pushed his sibling to the ground during an argument. It shattered the Windsor mantra of “never complain, never explain,” stripping back the mystique of monarchy, revealing a somewhat dysfunctional family trapped inside an institution it struggles to manage. “William takes his privacy very seriously,” says Robert Hardman, author of The Making of a King: King Charles III and the Modern Monarchy. “The fact that Harry’s book said out loud all those things said in private, that really hurt.” Hardman says William never read the book in full and was instead briefed by aides on its contents.

The decrepit working royals: Harry and Meghan’s lasting absence has created a manpower problem. William and Kate are the only full-time working British royals under the age of 60. The younger Windsors are eschewing the grinding rounds of endless ribbon-cutting their forebears engaged in to try to make fewer, more high-impact interventions heralded to the nation via social media.

Harry should have been a working royal too: And herein lies one of the central ironies of the Windsor story today: Those who have worked with Harry in the U.S. say he would have also made a great working royal. Since leaving his royal duties, Harry has embarked on tours of foreign countries that, from a distance, resemble those of the Windsor travels around the Commonwealth. He is a natural with kids and strangers, and colleagues have been touched when he talks of inheriting a role of service from his mother. He remains the driving force of the Invictus Games, which started with veterans, including some injured on the same tour as the prince. Last year, he traveled around Britain meeting with charity leaders and army veterans and engaging in balloon fights with children, with the kind of warm approach that had once made him so popular in the country. Shortly after, he visited Ukraine to meet with injured veterans. He raised eyebrows in Buckingham Palace when he then traveled to Canada to meet military veterans in the lead-up to Remembrance Day, traditionally a centerpiece event for the British royal family, where fallen soldiers are honored.

Changing the Archewell Foundation to Archewell Philanthropies: The dissolving of the foundation has left the couple with little to work on together, say former employees. Meghan continues to try to expand As Ever. Harry is known to play polo at a nearby club, and the couple socialize with entertainment executives with homes in the area, such as Netflix’s co-CEO Ted Sarandos, who gave them their first major production deal… The prince undertakes paid speaking work, including in December traveling to Toronto to address the Ontario Real Estate Association. But for much of the time, Harry is at home. The town around the Sussexes looks like a sun-kissed version of a Windsor Estate, with green acres and wide expanses.

The Windsors ignored the Duke of Windsor: The same strategy is being applied to the Duke of Sussex, but some royal watchers fret that the relationship could get worse before it gets better. The Duchess of Sussex could write her own memoirs or more freely air her views on American politics, though associates say she has been loath to weigh in on any topic that might invite the slightest controversy. Harry has in the past hinted he has enough leftover material from Spare to write a new book.

Harry needs to apologize, you guys: Others see the only way forward as reconciliation and bringing Harry back into some sort of royal orbit. The stumbling block, says the author Bedell Smith, is that Harry doesn’t seem inclined to apologize.

Harry would need his brother’s consent to remarry: For now, the hidebound traditions of royalty loom over their relationship. Harry remains family and fifth in line to the British throne. But when William becomes king, he will be able to wield power over the Sussexes, including the ability to strip them and their children of their titles if they step out of line or, in an extreme circumstance, removing his brother entirely from the line of succession. And if Harry were ever to remarry, he would have to ask the king to consent first.

[From WSJ]

I’ve already seen Tom Sykes pick up on the claims that Harry is just sitting around at home while Meghan builds As Ever. I cannot emphasize this enough: all of the “Harry has nothing to do in Montecito” narratives are coming from Kensington Palace. It’s an admission that Prince William and his staff obsessively keep tabs on Harry and try to figure out what he’s working on and what he’s doing. The fact that Harry moves like a shark pisses off his brother most of all. But the point of all of this is multifold: to whine about Harry stealing the Windsors’ thunder; to embiggen an angry, illiterate bald demon; and to remind Harry that he still could be a working royal, if he would just apologize to William and divorce Meghan!

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

77 Responses to “What’s the point of WSJ’s article about Prince Harry & Prince William’s rift?”

  1. Nicole says:

    “Angry, bald demon” I am crying. Love it.

    • convict says:

      Ha, that’s the nickname I was trying to remember – ‘[insert adjective] bald demon’!

      • Kimberly says:

        It’s a line from Black Panther: In the movie, M’Baku called Okoye a “bald-headed demon”.

    • Yes the bald demon is having quite the incandescent tantrum! Let’s not forget that the bald demon will be extremely satisfied once Harry’s titles are removed and then all of this goes away (NOT)!!!

      • Tessa says:

        I don’t think he will be satisfied. He also wanted (wants to?) to break up their marriage; bar them from doing any charity work whatsoever; want them to fail; wants Harry to come crawling back. Scooter is obsessed.

      • Yes I know he won’t be satisfied and that’s why I put NOT in capital letters.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      KP and William once again playing the only note they know how to play on the world’s saddest royal kazoo. Welp.

      If these top courtiers at either palace really wanted to keep their jobs, they’d get their principal before a psychiatrist ASAP because their man’s been in narcissistic collapse for six damn years already.

      William cannot ascend the throne in the state he is currently in. Cannot. Courtiers think they’re managing him but they absolutely are not. This is well beyond “ok yeah he’s a little messy but he’s still got capabilities” – no, that might be true for Charles but not Billy the Basher. William is a danger to himself and others, and the monarchy will die if it passes to him. The man hides out in his dozen homes and still cannot cover up the depth of his dysfunction; what do the palace and govt wonks think is going to happen when it’s his turn to be front and center?

      Narcissistic rage towards his brother is literally the only thing getting him out of bed in the morning now.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      The only card they have: Harry. To avoid it being about andrew and WHAT DID THEY KNOW

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        Bingo. 🎯💯

        Murdoch and his Rota WhatsApp are looking like an absolute bag of 🤡 here

        And so are all the courtiers participating in this ongoing calumny against the Sussexes.

  2. Blujfly says:

    I stopped reading at them claiming William often does the morning school drop off. William himself said Kate does 80% of the school runs. They should be asking themselves what the Prince of Wales does all day along while being part of an institution that receives 200 million pounds a year from the government plus security costs

    • Teagirl says:

      I suspect he does very little and that’s why he can’t imagine Harry having a busy life. He sees everything through the distorted lens of his own life.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        This! Peggington’s like: surely Harold doesn’t go to his office every morning to check in with invictus, better up, africa parks etc. to see the status of the projects he is involved with, right. It’s not like he has a few hour-long zoom calls to plan and organize his appearances with the various orgs he works with. Surely, he just jumps on a plane when one of his people tell him to and waves to people and stands around. It’s not like he writes and learns those speeches…please. What does he do all day??? Must be watching box sets and trying to figure out how to cheat on his wife on the DL while plotting a rival court. That must be it.

      • Isabella says:

        Invictus itself is a very big job.

    • Becks1 says:

      Those Aston Villa forums aren’t going to read themselves!!!!

      (but in all seriousness, in every accusation there is a confession and I think William is the one who is aimless, with nothing to do during the day, etc.)

    • Nicki says:

      lol that the school run is some sort of badge of courage for these people. Such a low bar. Bill probably calls spending time with his kids ‘babysitting’.

    • Dee says:

      I’m sure Normal Bill has reached a very high level of Candy Crush at this point. A high level worthy of a royal.

  3. Leesa says:

    WSJ is a Murdoch paper, so not entirely surprising.

  4. Teagirl says:

    All this article does is show a total lack of knowledge of how real life works, plus lack of insider knowledge of H&M’s life. They have absolutely no idea of all the things that Harry is working on, and fail to understand how a business functions and that As Ever is a success. It’s like me seeing my neighbour in the backyard almost every day and being the “friend” behind a statement saying ‘Ms X had no life at all, she was always home every day, never went anywhere and had no friends’.

    The other thing that stands out is what has been said many times before: nobody denies what Harry said is true, they’re just upset that he revealed it in a book.

    • Duch says:

      Yeah it was interesting that SBSmith called it “revelations” and not “allegations”. We’re all accepting the truthfulness of Harry’s text.

  5. Morning says:

    I am not sure we have ever heard William say anything about Harry.

    That being said, I believe much of what Harry wrote in Spare had already been published by the press. The two major differences are the dog bowl incident and the Sandringham summit. The Sandringham summit and the way the Institution tried to strong arm Harry, is appalling.

    The Royal family’s crocodile tears are annoying.

  6. Julia says:

    The article doesn’t make sense and feels like a rehash of stuff we have already seen in the UK Times and Page Six, both Murdoch publications. It comes across as tone deaf. At a time when Andrew is causing existential problems for the monarchy and they are called parasites at public events let’s worry about what private citizen Harry is doing in the comfort of his own home. In this article Harry is both everywhere Canada, Ukraine, Jordan, Australia but also stuck at home alone doing nothing. Absolute nonsense!
    Also, William don’t assume you are going to be king, nothing in life is certain…

  7. Dee(2) says:

    This is being covered in The Wall Street journal for the exact same reason that the nasty stories about the As Ever and Netflix partnership dissolution started in Page 6. Rupert Murdoch laundering criticism that is coming from Britain through his American Media empire to make it seem like it’s widespread.

    And it’s just more of the same, that gets printed in those newspapers everyday. By accurately documenting his own lived experience Harry was invading others privacy, Harry doesn’t have anything to do and is adrift because we don’t know what he’s working on until the day before it happens so we can’t copy or ruin it, Harry is really good at the job and the heir is lazy and is not fair that Harry won’t allow himself to be used as a workhorse, and Harry actually has no real control over his life, and the second his brother can he’s going to take away his titles and his kids titles because that’s all that makes Harry and that’s what’s most important to him ( hint, it’s not).

    The Jordan trip scared them, more than anything recently I think. Especially with Invictus stuff happening in a few months, and the strong likelihood that they will get their security back. Harry is garnering attention along with his intelligent charming wife in other countries. When he’s on UK soil, doesn’t have the taint of what did you know and why didn’t you do anything about it with Andrew, and also has his natural charm to contend with, William live and in living color is going to pale in comparison.

    • Lady Esther says:

      This. And wasn’t it the WSJ that did the hit job on H&M over Spotify? This is totally Murdoch getting back at Harry for the settlement over hacking, and doing the future king William a solid by as you astutely said “laundering criticism that is coming from Britain through his American media empire to make it seem like it’s widespread.” See also: Washington Post, NY Times, and the Hollywood trades, all of whom have British editors and/or journalists who all have links to the rota and British tabloids…

      Meredith Maines would at least have strong, positive narratives out, loud and proud and continuous, supported by professional PR and marketing campaigns. I have to say that without her, you can definitely tell that H&M are back to taking hits from the media

      • Jane says:

        Unfortunately for Murdoch, William and the WSJ this story is just a boring rehash of stuff we have heard before with zero evidence to back up lots of its points. Most people know that Andrew is the real story. Stuff like this just hastens the royal family’s demise because it makes them look dysfunctional.

      • Dee(2) says:

        @LadyEsther exactly and I’m glad you pointed this out specifically “Washington Post, NY Times, and the Hollywood trades, all of whom have British editors and/or journalists who all have links to the rota and British tabloids” because too many people seem to forget that an article in an American publication written by someone who came from 10 years at the DM is still British media.

        And while I really did like Meredith, and I feel like she got ahead of a lot of the potential stories with positive narratives so that they couldn’t get a foothold, I’m not sure how effective these hit pieces are anymore. I think they had their most effective moments in 2021 and 2022 when Harry and Meghan weren’t as visible as they are.

        But social media does a lot of heavy lifting that traditional comms can’t, they are traveling and appearing at events once a month, and I think that time is just working in their favor more.

        There’s the real worldwide issue with Epstein and his cronies and Andrew’s obvious deep involvement, and it’s been six years. Boredom I think it’s starting to kick in. Not necessarily for Harry and Meghan and their projects, but for all of the “they’re terrible for these reasons” that the British media writes every day. Referencing things they said in an interview 5 years ago and a book and docu series that came out 3 years ago with no follow-up is losing its impact.

      • Julia says:

        @LadyEsther
        I agree with Dee the media landscape has changed since the Epstein files were released. People know Andrew is the story. The hit pieces aren’t landing anymore.
        Liam their uk coms person actually has a good understanding of the uk media and who to give stories to. That has also lessened the impact of hit pieces in the uk media. Harry and Meghan being more visible also helps.

    • Becks1 says:

      I think the Jordan trip definitely rattled them. We haven’t seen articles like this in a while – meaning random articles about how much harry and william cant stand each other – yes we’ve had the articles taking down As Ever or criticizing the Netflix deal or whatever – but this article feels like one we might have seen all over the place a few years ago.

      I do think William is crashing out again and wants to remind people that HE’S in charge, HIM!!! If he wants to strip Harry’s HRH, he’ll do it! If he wants to remove him from the line of succession, he’ll do it!!! No one can stop him (except pesky laws but he doesn’t care about those.) I think its the one two punch of the Jordan visit and the announcement of an Australia visit in April.

      The more Harry works the worse William looks – not just because Harry is better at public appearances and the like, but also because it highlight’s William’s laziness and refusal to work more, refusal to travel, etc. That’s why he’s trying to convince people that Harry actually isn’t working.

      I feel like Invictus alone could be a full time job for Harry.

      • Nic919 says:

        Harry has charisma on the level his mother had. William did not inherit this and he’s been stewing in jealousy since childhood. Even being the next king isn’t enough for William. He wants it all and doesn’t want Harry to have anything.

        This WSJ article just reads like an emotionally stunted man is never going to get over his younger brother not taking his abuse. Harry is living his life and is happy, something William hasn’t been in years if ever.

  8. GMHQ says:

    There is no such thing as a working royal, not to mention that the term itself is obviously an oxymoron. The leave behinds coined the term to justify their abuse of the Sussexes when they left to explain why they were keeping them off the balcony and out of state dinners. The narcissism is hilarious. They actually think Harry is dying to cut ribbons and take orders from incompetent palace staffers when he is embraced around the world for his social activism with Meghan and making enough money to fund his own initiatives. What dinosaurs they are.

  9. Schell-Belle says:

    I also love how the WSJ’s idea of a miserable life for Harry is for him to spend most of his time at home in his beautiful palatial Californian estate, playing polo and hanging out with his adorable family.

  10. Brit says:

    ‘Never complain, never explain’ has never been true.
    All the ‘sources close to… friends of… royal insiders’ are permanently explaining and complaining.
    We need to edit all these articles so they say: ‘A royal source complained…’ or ‘A friend of WanK explained…’

  11. Tessa says:

    Scooter is in a Shakespearean role, as Richard II. It was a gut punch to Harry that his brother physically attacked him and had his minions take up a fake bullying investigation against Meghan. And Mrs. Scooter lied about Meghan and Meghan set the record straight. King Charles authorized damaging things being said by Charles about his parents in Charles authorized biography. The writer of this article ignores how Charles and Scoot protected Andrew and are still doing so. Scooter drove out the Sussexes and is still not satisfied and wants to “punish.” The real issue is the heir who is dysfunctional and wants to be king soon so he can “punish” Harry.

  12. Sharon says:

    They keep acting like it’s better to be in than out. But Harry is doing much better out of the firm, and he wanted that years before he even met Meghan. And now with the RF tarnished by the truth about Andrew, it’s even better to be outside of it. Once the oldsters pass on it’s only going to be Will, Kate & the kids. Harry was never close to them.

    • Amy Bee says:

      This is part of the reason why I think this piece was written by the WSJ London correspondent. Only the British journalists believe that being a “working” royal is the ultimate dream job.

  13. sunniside up says:

    “William’s future appears more predictable than ever,” than ever, his future was decided the moment he was born male.
    BTW William cannot strip all the titles, that would need Parliamentary time, and I can’t see any PM wanting to strip Meghan’s titles and be accused of racism. Even Andrew still has his titles, he has only agreed not to use them.

    • convict says:

      Apparently, the King did issue LP to remove Andrew’s HRH prefix and title of Prince. The notice was published in the Gazette. But the actual LP document has not been published. It might be a new norm to not publish. So, we just have to take the word of the monarch and his sycophantic staff.

      He was removed from the peerage roll, but yes, he is still officially The Duke of York.

  14. Jais says:

    So the younger Windsors are eschewing ribbon-cutting and doing less work. But they swear their work will be high-impact and heralded by their SM. Sorry but that sounds like the biggest joke. All this talk about Harry and yet here’s what the Wales will be left doing in the uk. Yikes.

  15. Tessa says:

    The same Sally Bedell Smith who labeled Diana as having “borderline personality disorder” in a book written after Diana’s death. The Same Sally Bedell Smith who blamed Diana for Charles’ cheating. Now she’s out to trash Harry, who is the most like Diana. And laud the dysfunctional Scooter.

    • Starry Owl says:

      The BPD rumors really stuck too. Regardless of their truth – the way they were weaponized against Dianna and therefore against any woman with that actual diagnosis is abhorrent.

      It’s been interesting- from a purely academic perspective – to see the shifting diagnoses for women to be more comprehensive than just “BPD”. And the things that were often labeled BPD but were in fact – ptsd among other things.

      Now, it’s widely understood that a cluster of diagnoses or mental health struggles are something that wasn’t even considered back when Dianna was supposedly diagnosed with BPD

      And that so called diagnosis did more to help the public forgive Charles than almost anything else. Because of course she wanted MORE than any person can give. It can’t have been that he was a shitty husband and partner who basically tricked a child into marrying him.

      • Tessa says:

        The origins of the “diagnosis” came from Dimbleby when he was writing the Charles book. He got a College 101 Psych textbook and “diagnosed” Diana as having BPD. He knew he’d be sued if he let that be in the book about Charles. Diana was still alive. But Junor and Bedell Smith found the notes and put this in their books about Diana. Diana was diagnosed with Bulimia Nervosa which she got under control. And was diagnosed by a doctor. I think only those who are Charles people believe this fake BPD diagnosis by biased writers. The “poor” Charles spin. The negative comments about Bedell Smith’s and other books that had the phony diagnosis are legion, only Charles people believe it, despite it being devised by those who disliked Diana. This also led me to believe that she and Charles were not “getting along” after the divorce. If they were he never would have allowed the writers to make up diagnoses about his late ex wife. I never bought into the diagnosis. It is slander and gaslighting

      • bloemheks says:

        All it took was a divorce to cure my “BPD.”

  16. Julie says:

    This is no more than a recap of every whines about the Sussexes. With Andrew story getting out, maybe that bald idiot will understand than privacy is not a total protection. And, of course, Harry stays at home… this is where is work office is. I would like to see some proof that he’s adrift or losing on his projects.

  17. Tessa says:

    Harry is not going to divorce and remarry, so it is useless for the writer to think Harry would have to ask Scooter’s permission about the second wife. Scooter did not want Harry to get married at all! Scooter’s trying to play dictator about his relatives personal lives is downright creepy. Will Louis have to get permission to marry the woman of his choice and there is a possibility that Scoot will disapprove. Louis could then elope and leave the UK with the wife of his choice. This article makes Scooter look really like he needs help.

    • Jes says:

      Also do we really believe Harry has to ask William for anything? That whole rigamarole for queens permission was bc Harry was still in the institution

      • Tessa says:

        Peggs had the nerve to dictate to Harry that he was “moving too fast.” He was then heir to the heir. And Peggs should have been shut down by his grandmother (who was the one to give permission) and his father. The biased writers try to make Peggs look like a “noble” character for trying to advise his brother when his ten year “courtship” of Keen is nothing to brag about.

  18. Pretty says:

    Why they’re acting like Harry was busier when living in the UK after leaving the army and even when he married Meghan his numbers of public events weren’t that great. His events were meaningful and Invictus and Sentebale did tangible things that’s why he wasn’t seen as lazy.

  19. danilou32 says:

    “And if Harry were ever to remarry, he would have to ask the king to consent first”

    Look I know what they are trying to do with this, but say Harry DID remarry and he DIDN’T get “permission”…what are they’re going to do to him? Lock him in the Tower of London? The control that that family try is exert is honestly crazy in a modern context and is also one of the main reasons that all of this has happened…they thought the could control Harry. To bad he’s very happy with his life now!

    I think the late Queen got a way with a lot, but even her having control over whether the men had beards and what colour nail polish women were to wear, not to mention the stockings (!!!) is franky insane.

    • Emily says:

      At this point the worst William can do is try to take away Harry’s title but honestly who cares. When you keep threatening something for so long when/if it actually baits an anticlimax because I’m betting most of the world would not care. These threats are looking increasingly stupid.

      • Tessa says:

        Parliament should ask Scooter why he is just limiting his title removing to the sussexes. Can Scooter give any tangible reason other than going on about Spare? Charles titles were not removed after he had a go at his parents and telling the world how ‘mean’ they were to him.

    • Tessa says:

      Charles was going to marry Camilla as his second wife no matter what. Harry would not be allowed to marry at all had Scoot been in charge. Harry would have married Meghan no matter what. And the writer is implying Harry and Meghan’s marriage will break up. They have been together for ten years now. It’s too late for the hand wringing about “divorce.” And is Scoot going to try to control Lili’s and Archie’s respective choices of partners too? What a control freak.

      • Chrissie T says:

        Only the 1st six in the line of succession have to ask permission. The reality is Harry and his children will be further down the line when William’s children marry and have families of their own. So it’s kind of a nonsense argument imo. Harry understands this more than anyone so I would imagine he doesn’t care. In the unlikely event he did want to remarry I think he’d just do it. Probably send William an invitation

      • Tessa says:

        what is sinister about talking of Harry’s “remarrying” is that there is an inference of the divorce of the Sussexes, something that derangers and bots wanted even before the wedding.

    • BrackenSweetwater says:

      Legally, if one of the first six in line to the throne were to get married without prior written consent from the Monarch then they and their descendants from that marriage would be permanently removed from the line of succession. I am fairly certain these people consider that to be a fate worse than death.

  20. Me at home says:

    The obvious solution is for Willy and Kate to get out there and do their own tour of a Commonwealth country, if they feel threatened by their harder working and more charismatic brother and sister-in-law. Or at least work more than once a week.

    But Willy’s apparently incapable of doing anything more than whine and spew nonsense about how it’s a “pseudo royal tour” when two private citizens do philanthropic work.

  21. Lucy says:

    I would think the WSJ has better things to do than carry water for the monarchy. Like, we’re in the middle of a “war”, the administration can’t keep any version of their story straight, we don’t know how many casualties or wounded we have, the pentagon spent $20+ million on steak and lobster in the past month, and they chose to cover a cranky prince? Or they could’ve investigated, I don’t know, any part of the Files. Literally anything.

    And they went with the groundbreaking Prince William Is Angry story.

  22. Shiela Kerr says:

    Some of these articles are so nonsensical they are unworthy of a response. So obvious Harry is living his best life with his family and humanitarian efforts and these folks ca not handle his moving on successfully

  23. Brassy Rebel says:

    They want Harry to apologize to his abuser. Not gonna happen. Another thing that’s not gonna happen is Harry asking for William’s permission to remarry. He’s already married and not into bigamy.

  24. Oh says:

    Another article about Will obsessed with Harry and Meghan.

  25. Giddy says:

    The 🛵 who will be king is too stupid to realize that by moving to deny Harry his birthright he only makes himself look small. These would not be the acts of a respected king, but the petty vindictive acts of a tyrant.

  26. Blubellah says:

    All I got from that article is:
    -They’re upset because Harry wrote about what happened to him and his wife even though Charles has done that in the past.
    -Confirmation that William plans to do even less work than he does now on the taxpayer dime. He’s worried that Harry’s privately funded work and impact will overshadow them and highlight the fact that there is increasingly very little return on the expense of publicly funding the monarchy.

    For someone who will soon be handed a lot of power and privilege on a golden platter; he seems to be acting out of a sense of powerlessness and fear. He comes across as lazy, petty, gaslighting, controlling, lacking motivation and in general not fit for purpose.

  27. MsKrisTalk says:

    Same tantrum different day. Every article is confirmation that William is a jealous, scared, lazy, tantrum throwing, insecure future king. That country, commonwealth, or whatever it is is in trouble because all Bald Man Slithering thinks about is Harry, who he can’t compete with even with the supposedly major title of King and a shiny crown waiting for him. I would laugh if the people came to their senses and abolish the monarchy. All they do is cut ribbons, have children standing in the cold rain, and worry about Harry and Meghan and call it work.

  28. Amy Bee says:

    I’m not sure what was the point of this article. It was just a rehash of what has been written by the British press and using the same royal commentators. I’m going to guess that it was written by the London correspondent at the behest of KP. The Waleses have a very close relationship after all.

  29. QuiteContrary says:

    All of those words to say that Harry didn’t lie in “Spare.”

    Note Sally Bedell Smith’s quote: “There are just so many wounding and damaging revelations.”

    And Robert Hardman’s: “The fact that Harry’s book said out loud all those things said in private, that really hurt.”

    They’re not even trying to dispute the truth as told by Harry. But still Harry has to apologize?

    • Tessa says:

      So Charles complained about his parents and that was damaging and wounding to them. Yet this is ignored. Shouldn’t the same apply to Charles?

    • Mrs.Krabapple says:

      It’s truly disturbing that they continue to blame the victim for reporting a physical assault. William is the fricking ASSAILANT, yet they want people to think the abuser is the real victim. Its disgusting.

  30. Gemini says:

    I thought this was coming from Tina Brown, it has all her favorite talking points. It is more than just Murdoch press machine attacking Harry. I think someone from the establishment with Murdoch’s blessing written this as a plea to get Harry back as a working royal. They know William’s tenure would be disastrous for the monarchy. They know he needs Harry. This is a plea on monarchy’s behalf but they can’t do it without angering the monster. So by belittling Harry’s life in Montecito and by waxing poetic about Scooter King’s superpowers, somehow they think they will convince Harry of his inevitable inferiority, accept his fate and go back to Scooter.

    • Isabella says:

      Imagine if Harry was still the spare when Will became king. He wouldn’t let the Sussexes go anywhere, even though he is too lazy to leave the house.

  31. Isabella says:

    The story is awash in false equivalents. Harry has no paid government security in UK. Of course he fears the cameras more than his brother does. Unphotogenic William is seldom seen in public, as the story admits. That’s his way of avoiding the cameras. Honestly, one wonders what he does all day. As for school runs, he doesn’t even live with the kids.

  32. Beech says:

    That ribbon cutting is “grinding” work. 😆😅🤣😂

  33. Sean says:

    No one cares.
    Funny that Sykes skipped the ‘Kate’s Hobbit toes’ story.

  34. Mel says:

    These people are so buried in their delusion. The respect people had for QE2 does NOT include any of you and it shows. Chuckles and Willard are going to bring the whole thing down. Chuckles for continued covering for Andrew and Willard for being an unhinged, lazy, rage monster consumed with jealousy over his brother.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment