Over the weekend, the Daily Mail began excerpting passages from Hugo Vickers’ latest royal book. Vickers is a long-time royal commentator and biographer, and he comes across as a really bitter old fart, even in the most generous reading of these excerpts. I don’t think royal commentators understand that when they clutch their pearls over every single thing about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, it comes across like those royalists were always going to have their panties in a bunch regardless of whatever Harry and Meghan did, said or wore. Vickers book is supposedly about Queen Elizabeth II’s final years, but he puts such an outsized focus on her apparently bigoted hatred of the Sussexes, to the point where even regular royalists are like “so, did she have a problem with her nonce son as well or what??” Some more highlights:
Archie’s godparents: For the christening on July 6, the new parents refused to announce who the godparents were. At that point, if not before, it was obvious that things were going to be tricky. I, for one, did not care who the godparents were, but I resented not being told.
Meghan vetted Harry’s speeches: Observers noted that Prince Harry’s speeches already had a Californian ring to them. In October 2018, they had visited Australia on a tour that was deemed successful, but every speech that Harry made had been vetted by Meghan.
Commonwealth Day 2018 vs 2019: At the Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey in 2018, before their wedding, the couple had been totally in tune. At the same occasion the following year, Harry appeared to be uncomfortable and the rapport between the two of them looked nil. He also seemed unhappy on Easter Day, and – as I observed in my diary – in a general sense looked like a man who had ‘bitten off more than he could chew’.
Miserable Meghan: That autumn, the Duchess of Sussex used an overseas visit to Africa to tell Tom Bradby of ITN that she was miserable. The Royal Family became concerned about what was going on in the Sussex Household – more so than about Prince Andrew, whose own troubles were mounting.
The Sussexit terms: In the end, the Sussexes left for Canada, but Prince Harry returned, keen to discuss a way forward with the Queen. He wanted a half-in, half-out arrangement, whereby he would be self-financing but could still work for the Royal Family. In the new year of 2020, the Private Secretaries to the Queen, Charles and William – Sir Edward Young, Sir Clive Alderton and Simon Case – went into summit mode on the Sandringham estate and drafted a proposal. Prince Harry flew to Sandringham and was told it was either all in or all out. He returned to Canada – reluctantly out.
The move to California: In Canada, the Sussexes were criticised for moving to California – flying there just before the borders closed. While in England everyone was working together, they were looking after themselves.
QEII’s view of fatherhood: The Queen took a dim view of her grandson, saying to a confidante: ‘And now Harry has opted out, and for what? To be a carer for Archie.’
The timing of Prince Philip’s hospitalization: The following year, the Duke of Edinburgh, then aged 99, was admitted to the Edward VII Hospital in London for tests. On March 1, he was moved to St Bartholomew’s Hospital, where he had an operation on his heart. His medical team nearly lost him twice. On Sunday, March 7, just six days later, with no consideration for the stress the Queen was under, or for the precarious health of the Duke of Edinburgh, a much-heralded interview between the Duchess of Sussex and Oprah Winfrey was screened. It wasn’t available in the UK until the following day, but kind friends in America made it possible for me to watch it that Sunday by pointing a camera at their television. My immediate reaction? ‘Sickening.’
The Queen’s Jubbly: Sadly, at a time when she should have been celebrating the twilight days of the greatest reign in British history, she had much on her mind – family problems with Prince Harry and the then Prince Andrew, and an increasingly maverick Prime Minister in Boris Johnson. Andrew had stepped down from royal duties in November 2019 ‘for the foreseeable future’. By January 2022, he’d dropped all his public appointments and ceased to use his HRH in public. On top of that, with no admission of liability, a considerable sum of money was donated to Virginia Giuffre – with whom Andrew had allegedly had sex when she was 17 – and her charities. This was done so as not to overshadow the Jubilee. Prince Harry, meanwhile, was now settled in California, where he was working with a ghost-writer on his memoir, Spare. Cynically, publication was delayed lest it coincide with the Queen’s death.
Harry’s relationship with his grandmother: Whenever Prince Harry called his grandmother, she asked her lady-in-waiting to stay with her. The distress the Sussexes caused the Queen in the last years of her life cannot be overestimated.
Naming their daughter Lilibet: Four years later, Prince Harry arrived in the UK for a stay at Frogmore Cottage with his wife and two children – the second of whom they’d named Lilibet. To use the intimate family nickname for the Queen, used only by close members of the family, was insensitive to say the least. They brought their children along to visit the Queen, who again considered it prudent to have a lady in waiting present.
Some fact-checking, in no particular order. Meghan didn’t say she was “miserable,” her eyes filled with tears when Tom Bradby asked how she was doing!! The Sussexes didn’t announce Archie’s godparents because everyone they knew was being targeted for harassment by the palace and media. Meghan didn’t go to church for Easter 2019 because she was heavily pregnant and resting, and I would imagine Harry was absorbed with getting back to her after he attended church. In 2020, both Harry AND MEGHAN returned to the UK, but the Sandringham Summit was only organized after Meghan left the country. Oh, and Harry only delayed the publication of Spare after his grandmother died. It was originally supposed to come out in late 2022. It was pushed back to January 2023.
And again with the story of QEII’s fury about Lilibet’s name. We’ve gone through this multiple times now and I am shocked that they’re still trying to figure out a way to make Harry and Meghan sound bad for naming their daughter after QEII. Not only that, they’re trying to make Harry sound bad for… being a hands-on father to his children. “A carer to Archie?” WTF??
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.
- 18/05/2019. Windsor , United Kingdom. Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex leaving the Lady Gabriella Windsor wedding at St.George’s Chapel, Windsor, United Kingdom.,Image: 506549457, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251, Model Release: no, Credit line: – / Avalon
- Royal Ascot, Portrait of HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second behind TRH Harry the Duke of Sussex and TRH Meghan the Duchess of Sussex,Image: 536132583, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Sorge / Andreas Bastian (Caro) / Avalon
- ** RIGHTS: ONLY UNITED STATES ** Berkshire, UNITED KINGDOM – The British royal family attends Royal Ascot Day 1 at Ascot Racecourse in Berkshire, United Kingdom. Pictured: Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex BACKGRID USA 19 JUNE 2018 BYLINE MUST READ: MediaPunch / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- ** RIGHTS: WORLDWIDE EXCEPT IN NETHERLANDS ** Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA – Meghan Markle The Duchess of Sussex is seen during a visit to the University of Johannesburg, South Africa, part of the Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU), of which she was announced as Patron in January 2019. Pictured: Meghan Markle BACKGRID USA 1 OCTOBER 2019 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- ** RIGHTS: ONLY UNITED STATES, BRAZIL, CANADA ** Windsor, UNITED KINGDOM – BGUK_1763809 – Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, attend a roundtable discussion on gender equality with The Queen’s Commonwealth Trust (QCT) and One Young World at Windsor Castle, Windsor, Berkshire, UK. Pictured: Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex,, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex BACKGRID USA 25 OCTOBER 2019 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- USA Rights Only – London, UK -20190311- Royals leaving the Commonwealth Service at Westminster Abbey, taking place as part of the 2019 Commonwealth Day. -PICTURED: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, Charles, Prince of Wales, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall -PHOTO by: PA Images/INSTARimages.com -41710364.jpg This is an editorial, rights-managed image. Please contact Instar Images LLC for licensing fee and rights information at sales@instarimages.com or call +1 212 414 0207 This image may not be published in any way that is, or might be deemed to be, defamatory, libelous, pornographic, or obscene. Please consult our sales department for any clarification needed prior to publication and use. Instar Images LLC reserves the right to pursue unauthorized users of this material. If you are in violation of our intellectual property rights or copyright you may be liable for damages, loss of income, any profits you derive from the unauthorized use of this material and, where appropriate, the cost of collection and/or any statutory damages awarded Featuring: Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, Charles, Prince of Wales, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall Where: London, England, United Kingdom When: 11 Mar 2019 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages.com **USA Rights Only**
- USA Rights Only – London, UK -20190517- Wedding of Lady Gabriella Windsor and Mr Thomas Kingston at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle. -PICTURED: Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry -PHOTO by: PA Images/INSTARimages.com -42955152.jpg This is an editorial, rights-managed image. Please contact Instar Images LLC for licensing fee and rights information at sales@instarimages.com or call +1 212 414 0207 This image may not be published in any way that is, or might be deemed to be, defamatory, libelous, pornographic, or obscene. Please consult our sales department for any clarification needed prior to publication and use. Instar Images LLC reserves the right to pursue unauthorized users of this material. If you are in violation of our intellectual property rights or copyright you may be liable for damages, loss of income, any profits you derive from the unauthorized use of this material and, where appropriate, the cost of collection and/or any statutory damages awarded Featuring: Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry Where: London, England, United Kingdom When: 18 May 2019 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages.com **USA Rights Only**
- North America Rights Only – London, UK -20190608- Queen Elizabeth II, Duke of Cornwall, Charles and Duke of Cambridge, William attend the Trooping the Color Ceremony 2019 at the Horse Guards Parade. -PICTURED: Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Prince Charles, HRH Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex -PHOTO by: INSTARimages.com Disclaimer: This is an editorial, rights-managed image. Please contact INSTAR Images for licensing fee and rights information at sales@instarimages.com or call +1 212 414 0207. This image may not be published in any way that is, or might be deemed to be, defamatory, libelous, pornographic, or obscene. Please consult our sales department for any clarification needed prior to publication and use. INSTAR Images reserves the right to pursue unauthorized users of this material. If you are in violation of our intellectual property rights or copyright you may be liable for damages, loss of income, any profits you derive from the unauthorized use of this material and, where appropriate, the cost of collection and/or any statutory damages awarded For images containing underage children: Be advised that some Countries may have restricted privacy laws against publishing images of underage children. Inform yourself! Underage children may need to be removed or have their face pixelated before publishing Featuring: Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Prince Charles, HRH Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex Where: London, England, United Kingdom When: 08 Jun 2019 Credit: INSTARimages.com **North America Rights Only**
- Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex arrives at the Easter Sunday church service at St.George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle on Sunday April 21, 2019 . Picture by Julie Edwards/LFI/Avalon. All usages must be credited Julie Edwards/LFI/Avalon.
- MANDATORY CREDIT: Chris Allerton – copyright SussexRoyal NEWS EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO COMMERCIAL USE. NO MERCHANDISING, ADVERTISING, SOUVENIRS, MEMORABILIA or COLOURABLY SIMILAR. NOT FOR USE AFTER FRIDAY JUNE 7, 2019, WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ROYAL COMMUNICATIONS AT BUCKINGHAM PALACE. This photograph is provided to you strictly on condition that these conditions and restrictions will apply (and that you will pass these on) to any organisation to whom you supply it. There shall be no commercial use whatsoever of the photographs (including by way of example only) any use in merchandising, advertising or any other non-news editorial use. The photograph must not be digitally enhanced, manipulated or modified in any manner or form and must include all of the individuals in the photograph when published. All other requests for use should be directed to the Buckingham Palace Press Office in writing. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are joined by her mother, Doria Ragland, as they show their new son, born Monday and named as Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, to the Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh at Windsor Castle.
- Britain’s Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex leave after attending the Commonwealth Service at Westminster Abbey in London, Monday, March 11, 2019. Commonwealth Day has a special significance this year, as 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the modern Commonwealth – a global network of 53 countries and almost 2.4 billion people, a third of the world’s population, of whom 60 percent are under 30 years old.
- The Duke and duchess of Cambridge stand with the duke and Duchess of Sussex at Westminster Abbey for a Commonwealth day service. Commonwealth Day has a special significance this year, as 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the modern Commonwealth, with old ties and new links enabling cooperation towards social, political and economic development which is both inclusive and sustainable. The Commonwealth represents a global network of 53 countries and almost 2.4 billion people, a third of the worlds population, of whom 60 percent are under 30 years old. Each year the Commonwealth adopts a theme upon which the Service is based. This years theme A Connected Commonwealth speaks of the practical value and global engagement made possible as a result of cooperation between the culturally diverse and widely dispersed family of nations, who work together in friendship and goodwill. The Commonwealths governments, institutions and people connect at many levels, including through parliaments and universities. They work together to protect the natural environment and the ocean which connects many Commonwealth nations, shore to shore. Cooperation on trade encourages inclusive economic empowerment for all people – particularly women, youth and marginalised communities. The Commonwealths friendly sporting rivalry encourages people to participate in sport for development and peace.

























Using a deceased person to trash harry and Meghan. The queen is made to look bad. And how about the queen hiding out Andrew and paying off that law suit. The alleged fuss over a child’s name is in bad taste. The child will hear about this. The derangers who write this stuff should be ashamed. And how about the lies by keen about Meghan.
Not the first time the Brit Media has conjured up the ghost of the Queen to attack Harry/Meghan.
Tell me, how did she feel about having to fork over £12,000,000 to protect her proven-liar son Andrew. How enjoyable were her last days when, in order to guarantee protection of Andrew, Charles made her recant her desire for Camilla to be known only as “QUEEN CONSORT” instead of “THE QUEEN.” a title which was later granted to her?!
I hope Harry/Meghan get a STUNNING reception in Australia!!!
“…a considerable sum of money was donated to Virginia Guiffre…and her charities…” Bitch please. To donate money means you do it voluntarily for altruistic reasons without expectation of return. This payment was to settle a lawsuit, not out of the goodness of the Queen’s heart. Give me a break.
Thank you! I nearly shrieked at the use of the word “donated” in this context. So offensive.
How kind of QEII to DONATE money to Virginia Giuffre for no reason at all but out of the kindness of her benevolent royal heart.
Insane.
I was incensed at that passage. Still am. 😤
I can’t believe an “author” would write such hogwash! To some of us including me it actually makes the Queen look bad.
She didn’t seem to take a dim view of Andrew’s behavior – not only the sex trafficking, but also his behavior as trade envoy. All of that had been reported to her over the years by multiple sources. But, she had a problem with Harry being a good father – sure. And you know, even if she did, she was wrong.
Really, these “royal experts” keep pretending that nothing has happened in the 6 years since H&M left.
I mean, the whole ass Prince of Wales disappeared for the better part of a year using “the school run” as an excuse, so I really need these people to focus on the people who are ACTUALLY “working” royals. Harry being an involved father is a beautiful thing.
How many of these ridiculous books need to be written? They all say the same things.
How many of the “carnival of so called experts” are going to write books about Harry and Meghan? My God!
We all know Harry and Meghan sells but dang how many versions of the same stories can these people come up with?
That’s the thing, I don’t think these books sell anymore. I haven’t looked it up but I can’t imagine Tom Bowers book is doing numbers, and you have Russell Myers book and now this Vickers book all within a month’s time, trying to find new angles on the exact same story. Who cares at this point, even if you are a die hard royalist?
They just want to pretend that they have some new insight because the whole royal commentator / expert ecosphere is on it’s last gasping breath. The two most dynamic members won’t have anything to do with you. No one wants to read the 75th book about Charles. The heir and his wife only want sycophantic things written about them, and then they still won’t give you any information to work with ( let’s really talk about who’s obsessed with privacy). And if they scratch the surface too deep on Andrew they expose the complicity of the royal family.
These people are in the burning down house trying to use glasses of water to put the fire out.
Especially when they always publish these lengthy excerpts in the tabloids— what’s the point in buying the book? (Not like I’d ever buy one anyway, but you know what I mean)
I won’t even check one of their books out from the library, I don’t want to remotely encourage any of these people.
@ Dee, Lorelei, and Christine –
I agree with all of you 100%! I think a member of sussex squad said They are trying to throw everything at Harry and Meghan and see what sticks. (if any)
Like Meghan said these tabloids should come with a warning label “Bad for your health” or something like that.
– may be time for me to stop reading these summaries and commenting on them
Nobody was working together during Covid. People were isolating as instructed. And Harry and Meghan were able to get to Cali.
I side eyed that as well. They very famously didn’t mask much and visited each other without any real attempt at limiting exposure through the staff and such in and out of their house. William seemed to have Covid very seriously at one point but it wasn’t covered until well after the fact.
I still can’t get over people who refused to mask or to stop holding massive events or congregating. And the BRF was right up there with them.
Didnt Charles give it to the Queen?
Somebody did. That the Queen of England got COVID was unbelievable. If anybody should have been protected, it’s her. They couldn’t be bothered.
And speaking of old folks, they actually operated on 99-year-old Phillip? Whatever the heart trouble was–if indeed he had an operation & if indeed it was his heart–isn’t that something that would have required a lot of thought & discussion? I’m not saying that once you hit a certain age you shouldn’t get health care, but surgery is a big deal & is a 99yo up to it?
Yeah, that was vile. “We’re all working together and he just jets off to CA thinking only of himself (and his wife and child)” when the whole point was they had to escape b/c his father pulled security. Did they expect them to run back to the UK immediately?
And it’s not like they took Covid seriously at all. W/C both got it and I believe gave it to the Queen instead of just taking basic precautions (and I thought it was interesting that Kate didn’t seem to get it so maybe they were living apart already). Mind boggling still that so many constantly minimized it and refused to follow basic precautions .
This. They weren’t gallavanting around the globe. Borders were being slammed shut for COVID.
They couldn’t stay in Canada, neither had the legal right to do so. They were incredibly lucky to get a spousal visa for Harry for the US during that time.
I’m sure some of the Windsors, like william, wanted Harry forced to return to the UK and Meghan forced to stay in the US with Archie.
Scooter is basically a stay at home dad. Depends on which home though.
Yep! i am wondering what the late Queen would think of Scooter Willi, prioritising school runs, going on holidays as soon the children are off school.
Scooter shirks his responsibilities while happening to be a father.
Stay at home parents actually work their behinds off. William could never.
They resurrected the dead Queen again and it’s funny how the “never complain, never explain” woman who raised absolutely horrible human beings seems to think she is some parental mentor to follow what a joke.. the woman was paying off women who were child victims of her son and she knew exactly what that son had done and was still doing… the best thing the Sussex’s ever did was escape this toxic family full of state funding parasites.
Right?! If I’ve learned anything after all of these years following along, it’s that none of these people are to be believed about anything, and I absolutely do not want to take any sort of life advice from any of them. A more gruesome bunch could not be found. QEII was a giant asshole, but please keep writing books, making her look EVEN WORSE in each one.
I look forward to the day that the red-headed blue-eyed Lili having all the directness of an American is approached by BM as a young adult about her name being an insult to the late great Queen and she says..
First off my grandmother loved it, my dad has it on recording, secondly I go by Lili and not Lilibet and there are hundreds of thousands of us, and lastly get over it nobody cares.
I think Harry should thank that friend that introduced him to Meghan.
Poor Betty was using a burner phone to talk to Harry, so much for wanting a lady-in-waiting in the room.
They’re jealous that Harry’s speeches are relatable.
What did Meghan do to these people, 6 years later and it is still the same recycled crap.
Yeah, the “wanting” a lady in waiting with her is curious phrasing when, like you said, she was using a burner phone, had been video chatting them, and made sure H&M had their own entrance during the jubilee service.
Maybe she had someone there to help with mobility or maybe Charles/W ordered someone to stay with her.
You know what we call a man who “cares” for his baby? A father. I think that’s the word they were looking for.
You’ve said it perfectly, Molly! I especially enjoy the irony of QEII apparently doling out childcaring advice. I don’t think anyone, even a royalist, could look at the Queen’s four children and think “What a resounding success!”
I’ll just add that on Easter Sunday 2019 a new exclusive came out in the Sunday Times that reported about William’s alliance with the newspapers to smear Harry and Meghan, his jealousy of them and his desire to see them shipped out of the country because they had become too popular. That article may have been weighing on Harry’s mind that day. It’s interesting that no one can promote their royal books without talking about Harry and Meghan.
Yeah, if Harry looked out of sorts at a royal event it’s probably because they were persecuting him and his wife. You know, the one he left with?
So many books about 18 months, I swear. Most of this is stuff that other people have already written about numerous times. These books can’t be selling well, because they’re just repackaging the exact same stories over and over again. It’s just a sustained tantrum that Harry and Meghan weren’t going to play the game like everyone else.
I mean ” I, for one, did not care who the godparents were, but I resented not being told.” Dude you’re a stranger. You don’t know these people for real. Harry seemed tense during Commonwealth Day 2019, you mean when his wife was heavily pregnant and we know now had suicidal ideation? The queen thought he wasn’t doing anything but being a carer for his son? Well that makes her a shitty parent not Harry. What seems to really bother them the most is the idea that Harry decided to take autonomy for himself.
These stories don’t make the royal family look good, so I think this is just a crash out from these people upset that they are on the outside. They don’t get to know what Harry and Meghan are working on. They aren’t getting invited over for tea. They don’t know who the godparents of their children generally are, they don’t have little anecdotes about the behavior of Archie or Lili that they can monetize. And what is probably the worst thing, they’ve made the world realize that being a member of the British royal family isn’t the highest pillar of achievement.
That was an incredible line. He “resented” not being told who the godparents were? Really? My dude, you’re a total stranger! Get over yourself. My god these people are unhinged.
Dee and Lorelei – yes!!
The whole thing is so bizarre and parasocial. Vickers is constantly saying “as I wrote in my personal journal at the time…” As if that makes it a fact! Who cares what you wrote in your journal? You’re not family and Harry and Meghan are none of your business.
He sounds like a teenager keeping a diary, writing what he wished were true, then locking it at night with a tiny lock and key and keeping it under his pillow. WTF.
Either Vickers cared who the godparents were, which is why he was so resentful when he wasn’t told. Or he didn’t care who the godparents were. Which is it? Pick a lane dude.
In addition, Oprah interviewed BOTH Meghan AND Harry, it was not just “a much-heralded interview between the Duchess of Sussex and Oprah Winfrey”. With each fevered, desperate royal reporter book published, these racists confirm every single thing that Harry wrote and that he and Meghan said.
I doubt it was the Queen ensuring that she had someone with her; it was more likely the vipers in the palace insisting that someone was in the room (under the guise of concern for her failing health), because how else would they get news to leak to their friends in the media? Remember that bit in Spare when the queen was very reticent on a call and Harry realised that the Bee (?) was lurking in the room? The photographs of the queen driving to meet Harry at Frogmore as soon as he arrived showed clearly that she had no problems meeting her grandson on his own. And the fact remains that both Queen Elizabeth AND the Duke of Edinburgh continued to have positive contact with Harry and Meghan after they left. THIS is what pisses them off: that the queen and the duke kept in touch and didn’t spill any details to their staff which could end up in the papers. That is why when they returned for the Jubilee and took their children to meet the Queen, her staff – the paid help – went out of their way to restrict their interactions as much as possible. Yet NOTHING has spilled about that meeting, despite insinuations and gloating about staff “preventing” the Sussexes from bringing a photographer. We have had no word about anyone else being present, and Harry certainly only mentioned the queen being present for that meeting in his book.
My favorite example, actually, is the secret meeting Harry and Meghan had with TQ on their way to the IG in the Hague in spring 2022 – followed by Harry’s later statement (to Hoda Kolb?) that he wanted to make sure TQ had the right people around her. IIRC, this meeting took Charles completely by surprise, and he and Camilla came rushing back from wherever they were making an appearance, though not sure if they ultimately met with H&M too. Note also, this secret visit by H&M took place AFTER the Oprah interview the previous year. So whatever TQ felt about that interview (and remember, H&M made it clear shortly afterwards they weren’t referring to either her or Philip in their comments to Oprah), she was still willing not only to see them, but to go through the trouble of arranging it covertly.
@Magdalena, I didn’t even catch that about the Oprah interview, but it’s such a good point. These people write about Harry as if he has absolutely no agency of his own. Everything is on Meghan. It’s such a warped mindset.
Harry and Meghan are rapidly approaching their 8th wedding anniversary and those gutter rats are still dragging up nonsense from pre wedding post wedding and inbetween. All this rewriting will not change they are married, loved up with 2 beautiful healthy kids while living their best lives. If they did not like their late Queen just say so instead of rewriting her history with the Sussexes. Harry obviously loved his grandmother and she appeared to love him. He expressed in his book how she granted him permission to marry his now wife. These books are written for the audience in the UK become most outside have moved.
This is kind of hilarious in a bonkers way. The Queen was disgusted that Harry cared for his son. If this is true wow the Queen was mean. If it’s not a terrible thing to write. I think they were all probably incredibly rude and nasty about Harry and Meghan behind closed doors. The more people like this man write this story the worse they make the royals sound.
Maybe next we’ll hear what the Queen thinks about W&K’s obsession with the school run as well as taking off every single day of all of their children’s school breaks.
You know what? I’m going to give Vickers one point for honesty for admitting that obviously he didn’t really care about who Archie’s godparents were, but “I resented not being told”. I wish he could have followed that feeling to maybe starting to question why, exactly, he should feel that way, but at least he successfully named one emotion – progress!
I consider Vickers’s book to be nothing but a pack of lies, written largely for the delectation of the readers of the D Mail. All of these ‘royal’ authors are desperate to make themselves a bit of money, and as said elsewhere on here the book appears to be re-packaged false stories, and statements attributed to people in no position now to deny them.
I think they’re all trying to make bank now before the entire institution crashes and disappears.
They got the ouija board out again to speak for the dead Queen!
Everything this pos wrote is so easily refutable. And the liw thing! Either made up or from that other @#>”$
The queen needing someone with her when she spoke to harry. Is fake story. More deranger tales. Harry has the facts in spare. He got along with his grandmother. No mention of the temper tantrums of scooter
Oh boy, here we go again!!
I guess this fool put his ” book” out now to compete with bowels for the title of most racist ahole. I really hope they cannibalise each other and neither book sells. After all, how many ways can you put words in a dead woman’s mouth? None of which makes her look like the benevolent grandmother of the country as she was portrayed while she was alive. They are so focused and determined to attack Meghan, they can’t see that they are only making the late Queen look horrible. And oh my God, the lies!!!
Duly noted that everyone is screaming, crying, and throwing up over the Sussexes just living and loving each other more than the disgusting behavior of the predator prince who did not “donate” a huge sum to Virginia Giuffre. He settled a lawsuit which accused him of raping her. Hugo Vickers is a horrifying creep.
They are so incandescently angry over this name. It’s ridiculous. It wasn’t some secret nickname; we knew about it already. I think it’s sweet that H&M, who both use nicknames themselves (Harry and Meg, where Meghan is her middle name anyway), gave their kids nicknames for their names. It’s nice.
But for the British press, it’s like the godparents. They’re angry they didn’t get to dictate the name and they’re angry that the first (known) British princess of color has a prominent tie to her grandmother, the longest serving monarch in history.
Easy to put words in a dead woman’s mouth, isn’t it? Especially years after her death? How pathetic can these people be? I suppose they’re all pissed about the Sussexes’ upcoming Oz tour, because the incredibly lame bots are out in full force these days.
I’m wondering if these trash books were not excerpted in the tabloids would sell any copies. Perhaps being excerpted is the goal. It’s the only way the book will get eyeballs. Mind you, the eyeballs that the excerpts get may not belong to people who will go to buy the book; after all, they seem to excerpt most of the book anyway. Using the dead Queen to flog aid their smearing campaign probably has the tacit approval of Charles, don’t you think?
Jumpin’ Jehoshaphat!!
These tiresome people (courtiers) and their monstrous “palace sources!”🤬
Let’s face facts: These bitter old racists hated that a child who’s partly Black was named for the dead queen. Would there be any of this nonsense if Charlotte had been named Lilibet?
The one-drop rule lives on in the Royal Family.
You will never convince me that the second William and Kate heard Lili’s name, they didn’t immediately wish they had one ounce of creativity between the two of them and had chosen it for Charlotte. It completely makes the fact that all of QEII’s granddaughters and great-granddaughters have “Elizabeth” as a middle name look performative, like checking a box. Lilibet is personal, and speaks to Harry’s affection for his grandmother. Affection that was seriously misplaced, it appears, but nonetheless, it existed.
Those two are dedicated to advancing the idea that Charlotte is the second coming of QEII or Diana, but they didn’t choose either for Charlotte’s first name. Poor stupid sausages.
They weren’t even original, as Charlotte Diana is the name of one of earl Spencer’s daughters. KKKeen named their daughter after her own stage mummy. They’re not fooling anyone, she was named for carole ( same name root).
Nah, then it would have been Princess Catherine’s “sweet nod” to the queen. Insert eye roll.
So many ‘sweet nods’. She’s portrayed like a bewigged bobblehead.
Money was ‘donated’ to Virginia Giuffre?!?!?! The gall of these people!!!! 😡
The only feelings Elizabeth felt for Harry, besides love, were respect and trust. It was Harry she sent on her behalf to international diplomatic meetings, Philip entrusted the army to him, Meghan Elizabeth gave the National Theatre to, and so on. Elizabeth herself was a hard worker, clearly seeing the contrast between the slackers
WK and the hardworking, responsible, always prepared, and creative H&M.
Of course, she was furious and devastated that H&M were leaving, because they were the best the BRF had, but she understood their motives and saw what was happening. She helped them as much as she was allowed, issued a very warm statement, and provided them with a royal welcome and her own protection at the Jubilee.
The only real quibble at the last Jubilee was not H&M, but Kate, butting heads with the Queen. The video shows her standing next to the Queen and preventing William from standing there. She basically blocked him. Because of her, the evening’s photoshoots were repeated, as Elizabeth didn’t have a photo with her heirs, only with Middleton. This time, they sent Kate to the end of the balcony, and the Queen wore her greenest outfit. Of course, Kate wore bright pink, but she was at the end, and they cropped her out in most of the photos.
Kate proved once again what a bitch she was. It was Elizabeth’s last anniversary, her last party, and everyone knew it, but Kate couldn’t just let it go; she had to be the center of attention.
I”m glad you said this about TQ’s relationship with Harry and Meghan, because I think you’re exactly right. I’ve never heard Harry, or in particular, Meghan, speak about her without affection and respect. Whether she truly had these myriad minor quibbles about the wedding, the dress, etc., the fact remains that less than a month post wedding, she’d invited Meghan to accompany her on the royal train, something she’d never done, and never did, for Kate.
I’d go one step further and say, I think she was happy for Harry, that he finally found a partner who made him so happy, a woman of substance who had the ability, and desire, to share the life he envisioned for himself. You can see her pleasure in the picture with newborn Archie. Regardless of her failings with respect to Andrew, she’d been around long enough, knew by then William’s failures, certainly Charles’ flaws, and Harry himself has said, she was well aware of the challenges he and Meghan were facing, because he’d talked with her over time.
I said elsewhere I’m reminded of the secret visit H&M made to TQ in spring 2022, on their way to The Hague for Invictus – Harry announced he wanted to make sure she had the right people around her. I believe at the end of her life her ability to accomplish much of anything was hampered (if not actively deflected), ultimately by her final illness, but also by the fact that Charles had wormed his way in as more or less defacto regent, starting as soon as Philip retired. I was surprised at H&M’s reception at the church during the Jubilee, and always wondered if/what she had to agree to, for that to happen, because it’s hard to imagine that being Charles’ choice. (And we saw in real time how angry it made Kate.)
@windyriver
I’m sure Harry and Meghan have letters from Elizabeth and recordings of their video calls, including those with Philip. Harry himself said somewhere that while living in the States, he saw his grandmother more often (on video) and talked to her more than when he was in England. :)).
I’m waiting for the day when Harry shuts up those lousy pseudo-journalists and Welsh people by publishing one of Elizabeth’s letters or statements. May they all be on their heels…! All this hate has justified their attacks with “Harry and Meghan hurt our Queen,” when in reality, H&M were one of the exceptions who truly cared about her. I think Anna did the same, and that’s it.
They need to be careful about using the dead queen to bash people. She was NOT a nice person. When qe11 visited Jamaica in the sixties and early seventies, the authority was told to and did round up all Rastafarians they could find and TRIM THEIR HAIR WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT!
Are the royalists ready for a scavenger hunt to find where qe11 buried her bodies? Be careful what you ask for, you may just get it!
WTF?!?! That’s horrible but sadly not surprising. Natural hair styles by Black Americans were under attack in the US for generations, with corporate, “professional ” & military policies enforcing “white” hair style “standards”. And the current admin is doing everything in its power to antagonize the Black community (see the recent vote for No reparations at the UN by the US & Israel) and undo many of the civil rights acts that had long been fought for, with the legal erosions and some actual policy reversals affecting all minorities, esp white women, who were the largest beneficiaries of those laws.
All these scribblers do is prove that no one, including most members of the BRF, knew, nor took the time to really get to know Harry. They only knew & care about the false negative “Harry narrative” they created & still refuse to let go of. The BRF largely emotionally neglected W & H after Diana’s tragic death. But an adult H was able to develop a positive relationship with both of his grandparents, as his and M’s continued communications with them post Sussexit showed. In trying to tarnish the relationships between QEII, Phillip and M&H, & ignoring QEII’s relationship & protection of Andrew,, the Rats are greatly tarnishing her legacy & image. Their continuous hatred of the Sussexes & inability to read the room will hopefully bring the whole house of cards down.
Yeah , none of this makes Betty look good . She comes across as a racist old hag who preferred to protect her P son instead of her grandson mixed race child. . As for naming lily after Betty, well i respect Harry and Meghan choice but I have to tell you , if I were Meghan , after I had lived through how horrible a grandmother petty Betty was and how she didn’t give a shit about me or my child or my husband, it would have been a cold day in hell before I named any of my children after her . Yes I know that Meghan had nothing but nice things to say about Betty , but I saw from Betty actions in regards to how she protected Andy versus how she left Harry and Meghan and their children to fend for themselves, that she was at best a horrible human
Agreed. Old Betty the Bigot was well aware of the racist abuse the media was piling on Meghan, but the queen did absolutely nothing. She didn’t love Harry enough to stand up for him. The only thing that makes sense is that Betty was a huge racist too, but she was good at pretending for PR purposes.
@OverIt 💯
I only came her to ask. Who gives a shit???? Does anyone really care about these royal douchebags? Why is this site so obsessed with royals? They all suck. And I can’t imagine anyone in the US caring one bit. And if you do, you need to get a life. Get better content CB!