WWD: Duchess Meghan’s Oz tour generated $51.6 million in media impact value

We could sense, in real time, that the Duchess of Sussex’s Australian-tour style was making a huge impact. Every time she stepped out in an Australian designer’s clothes or jewelry, the designers were immediately giving interviews, praising her for highlighting their brands and discussing how they managed to get their products in front of her (more times than not, it involved a personal note asking her to consider wearing their products). An added bonus for everyone involved was that Meghan’s new OneOff account was instantly identifying her outfits and directing people to the designers’ sites. As we’ve seen before, the Meghan Effect is transformative for so many small brands and woman-owned labels. They’re getting global exposure and an immediate uptick in interest and sales. Well, Women’s Wear Daily broke down the numbers of Meghan’s impact on Australia’s fashion industry with the Sussexes’ four-day tour. Long story short: there’s a reason why every designer wants Meghan to wear their products, because holy sh-t.

According to Launchmetrics data supplied to WWD, the tour generated a total of $51.6 million in media impact value between the dates of April 14 and April 17, with Australian fashion and jewelry brands major beneficiaries of the attention. Meghan Markle’s tour wardrobe showcased at least 16 local brands, including Karen Gee, Scanlan Theodore, St. Agni, Camilla and Marc, Matteau, P Johnson, Beare Park, Paspaley, Friends With Frank and Rolla’s Jeans.

One key development since 2018: beyond the plethora of Markle-style blogs and media outlets that monetize her appearances through shop-her-look affiliate links, this time the duchess made her tour looks shoppable through the AI-powered, creator-led fashion discovery platform One-Off..

At the beginning of the tour the Los Angeles-based company revealed the duchess had partnered with the platform as a participant and investor. More than two dozen Australian products sold out, according to the duchess’ publicist, with OneOff cofounder and chief executive officer Emir Talu telling WWD “OneOff surpassed 1-plus million views of outfits on the site in the first three days since Meghan launched her page on the platform.”

“The Sussexes’ Australia tour is a reminder that the Sussex effect still translates into real brand performance. When Meghan wears a brand, the data follows,” said Launchmetrics chief marketing officer Alison Bringé, who revealed that Karen Gee’s custom-fitted navy double-bonded crepe Priscilla dress worn by the duchess for the couple’s first engagement on April 14 at Melbourne’s Royal Children’s Hospital generated $1.6 million in MIV in 48 hours for the brand. The ready-to-wear version of the dress sold out on the Karen Gee website within two hours, according to Gee, who was blindsided back in 2018 after the duchess also made her first appearance of that tour in a Karen Gee dress — simultaneously announcing her pregnancy and crashing the designer’s website.

This time Gee was ready for any sales chaos. “We had a contingency plan in place and were all organized to take preorders,” Gee said.

Later on April 14, the duchess changed into St. Agni’s brown suede Utility Cocoon bomber and matching pencil skirt for an engagement at the Australian National Veterans Art Museum, generating $998,000 in MIV for the brand over 48 hours.

After two of its products were showcased on April 16 at two separate engagements, Friends With Frank earned $575,000 in MIV in 48 hours. The duchess wore the brand’s camel Lou car coat for a tour of Melbourne’s Scar Tree Walk, later changing into Friends With Frank’s khaki sleeveless Anja sack dress for an engagement at Swinburne University organized by youth mental health organization Batyr. Both styles sold out on the brand’s website within 48 hours.

“The website didn’t crash, thank god,” said Friends With Frank founder and creative director Julia McCarthy. “We were prepared, we made sure all the pieces she had selected were well stocked and had preorder set up. We resumed U.S. and U.K. shipping the week prior. To be honest, naively, I didn’t know how much it was going to blow up. I also wasn’t even sure if she was going to wear the pieces.”

Scanlan Theodore reported the combined sales of three of its products featured on the tour were up 250 percent week-on-week. The duchess carried the brand’s Athos Shopper tote on two occasions and chose its putty-colored Cashmere Tie Sleeveless Tank and matching Italian Slouchy Trouser to wear for the upward of 2,699 Australian dollars, or $1,934, a head at Her Best Life luxury wellness retreat at Coogee Beach on April 17. The latter outfit generated $247,000 in MIV for the brand in 48 hours.

Melbourne label Rolla’s Jeans earned $109,000 in MIV after three of its jeans were featured. At the time of writing, sales for the Midtown Bootcut Jean in Iris Wash were up 800 percent week-on-week, with sales for all other Midtown Bootcut Jean fits up 150 percent week-on-week, according to Rolla’s Jeans cofounder and marketing director Rich Bell.

“We’ve got a very strong website, making sure that it can take those kind of hits from big influencers,” said Bell, who is no stranger to influencer-driven sales spikes, with the brand’s jeans seen on names such as Bella and Gigi Hadid, Sydney Sweeney and Helena Christensen. But the Markle effect, Bell conceded, is next level. “It’s bolting — absolutely,” he added. “It’s really a hurricane.”

[From WWD]

It’s so smart of Meghan and these designers to work together to a degree – the designers were obviously dying for Meghan to wear their stuff, but they also wanted to be prepared for when she stepped out in one of their items and all hell broke loose. $51.6 million in media impact value in just four days for a non-royal tour which was organized by the Sussexes’ small team, and none of the events were, like, state dinners or galas or anything. Bonkers. What’s even crazier is that even Meghan’s haters can’t acknowledge the simple fact that Meghan moves product like no one else, and that her impact on fashion is HUGE. There were hyperventilating royalists on British television ranting about Meghan’s clothes and how dare she profit from OneOff or how dare she wear this or that and how dare she wear “frumpy” clothes. Again… $51.6 million in media-impact value in four days.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images, Her Best Life Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “WWD: Duchess Meghan’s Oz tour generated $51.6 million in media impact value”

  1. SussexWatcher says:

    Holy cow! 51.6 million!!!!!! No wonder the rota rats can’t stop talking about her. The Meghan Effect is real. While the Keen Effect is at the bottom of an old bag of ratty wigs.

    I hate AI with a passion but I am so glad HRH Duchess Meghan is doing the OneOff site and earning the money through what she wears rather than all of those other sites, which I don’t necessarily feel are supportive of her overall. If the OneOff site got more than a million clicks in 3 days, I wonder how much Meghan made? I hope it was a lot!!! 💰

    • Magdalena says:

      I agree with you. A lot of those sites which “catalogue” what Meghan wears are run by a bunch of Karens who seemingly can’t stand her, or the idea of her, or the idea of her being successful and happily married, yet they monetise her every which way. There were a couple of hater-adjacent sites which regularly promoted hater posts while earning masses from affiliate links to Meghan’s outfits, and one of them only belatedly began to write about Kate’s clothes when their focus on Meghan, and not on their “fave” Kate, was called out. I avoid all of those sites. Never click on a single one. I’m pleased that Meghan decided to invest in OneOff and earn money from her fashion for a change. I hope she puts them all of the two-faced leeches out of business.

  2. aquarius64 says:

    When IG in Birmingham UK comes around in 2027, you can’t tell me UK brands don’t want Meghan to wear their fashions; but they won’t because they are afraid of offending the Crown and not getting a Royal Warrant.

    • SussexWatcher says:

      I really hope she saves them having to decide by not stepping foot in the UK. She should only go to countries that want her there and where she’s safe. IMO.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Considering that Meghan tends to mainly wear past season and repeats to the Invictus Games, I don’t think those British designers won’t have to worry about offending the Royal Family.

  3. `Shiela kerr says:

    Meghan is “that” girl who many women with taste love to imitate her style. Happy for the Australian designers and happy Meghan has invested in OneOff.

  4. 2131Jan says:

    What I love about M’s fashion is that not only is it gorgeous and sleek, some of it is *very* affordable (especially as most, being neutrals) make a great basic wardrobe base. It’s also great that so many “sleuths” can find more affordable dupes, too.

    But let’s be real, too: it’s her natural elegance and grace that elevates the plainest T-shirt as well. Her styling (minimal jewelry), a belt, a popped collar, pushed up sleeves… all just seem to *work* so fabulously on her.

    And let’s face it, too, she gives GREAT *FACE* lol. Whether with or without makeup, hair slicked back, or in a ponytail, or waving down her back, she has “IT”, charm, grace, and natural elegance paired with a gorgeous smile. Girl can wear a potato sack and look like a million bucks (and sell it out, to boot!)

  5. Al says:

    At the end of the day, the proof is in the pudding.

    This is exactly why Meghan Markle doesn’t pay attention to the noise—she understands her worth and the level of influence she has.

    Personally, I wouldn’t buy anything made by, or worn by, someone I don’t like—no matter what it is. So if people are actively purchasing the accessories and clothing she wears, it’s clear they genuinely like and appreciate her and her style.

    End of.

    • Lamb chop says:

      Her name isn’t Markle. It’s been Sussex for 8 whole years.

      • Al says:

        My editing app automatically typed Markle and I didn’t see it. I don’t think I’ve ever knowingly mentioned Markle in any of my comments about Meghan. Even if she wasn’t a Sussex, I wouldn’t call her Markle.

      • Lamb Chop says:

        Apologies for jumping on you for that. I see so much Markle even on fan accounts, its grating. Interesting the app did that though!

  6. Jais says:

    Okay, that’s crazy. Truly. For comparison, brands get those kind of numbers for the golden globes or the Oscar’s. But it’s dispersed bw different celebs. This was all just Meghan.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/shopping/selena-gomez-top-golden-globes-red-carpet-power-rankings-1236474412/

  7. OriginalMich says:

    Wow, if that is the media impact for brands, I wonder how much the media actually raked in from all of their bitching and moaning. Has anyone ever written about how much the media earns from its obsessive hate coverage of these two?

    • Eurydice says:

      That’s their little secret. A decade of Meghan-hate doesn’t come from only William’s jealousy and rage – it’s a product people buy.

  8. Eurydice says:

    Wow, wow, wow – so you mean to tell me that Meghan isn’t universally shunned, that people and businesses actually want to work with her? Astonishing!

    But really, I love the behind-the-scenes look at how the designers prepared for the “Meghan effect.”

  9. Inge says:

    I knew she wore some Australian designers but 16 brands? Wow!

    And how wonderful that they had a heads up.

    51.6 million is insane. Go hurricane Meghan!

  10. Amyb says:

    Attack of the day was her “merchandising off of the Bondi Beach shootings” by featuring the out fit she wore. Someone X shut that shit down by showing the Daily Fail doing a look like Meghan affiliate ad for the outfit. (And the real derangers that the shirt she wore was insensitive because it had stripes like kind worn in the holocaust Camps). Crazy town.

    • Binge says:

      Yes, I saw that the holocaust reference as well. But I guess the Daily Mail either could not muster enough outrage to make this a story, or considered the serious ramifications of writing such a vile article and decided against it.

      They are dispicable.

    • Eurydice says:

      Interesting how Kate’s Ralph Lauren striped shirt didn’t remind them of the holocaust.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    This is amazing. I still remember when Meghan first left the UK, someone in the Telegraph was upset that weren’t able to add affiliate links to their articles because they didn’t know what she was wearing in her video appearances. The truth behind the British press’ anger about Meghan joining One off is that she’s undercutting the business they do when they put affiliate links in their articles.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment