Princess Eugenie announced her pregnancy last week. She’s expecting her third, with husband Jack Brooksbank. Interestingly, Eugenie allowed Buckingham Palace to make the announcement or confirmation, and the palace’s statement very carefully avoided saying the names of Eugenie’s parents. I mean, Eugenie’s father was arrested in February and Eugenie’s mother has been on the run and in hiding abroad for the better part of five months. I don’t blame anyone for not including Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson’s names in the pregnancy announcement. Allegedly, Eugenie didn’t even tell her father the pregnancy news – Andrew reportedly found out in a phone conversation with Sarah. This is all according to the Mail, which had several big stories about the House of York this weekend, almost all of which were centered on Eugenie’s pregnancy and how the knives are out for the Yorks.
Eugenie wondered about how to announce her pregnancy: The Mail on Sunday can exclusively reveal that the Palace became involved in issuing a formal proclamation only after Eugenie’s cousin Zara Tindall, one of the few to have been entrusted with the news, persuaded her to write to the King. A royal source has told me that Eugenie did so via an Easter card accompanied by a carefully written letter sent to her uncle. ‘She and Jack were quite surprised by the warmth of the Palace response,’ says the well-placed source, who claims that while the King is reported to feel protectively towards his nieces, they have seen little real sign of it in recent months….The couple had feared a frostier reception and had been contemplating making a media announcement of their own without the Palace being involved, but the King made contact and asked his officials to make a formal announcement.’ That proclamation, the MoS has learned, was purposefully delayed to ensure it didn’t overshadow the King and Queen’s recent overseas trip to the US and Bermuda.
Camilla wants the Yorks obliterated! But if the King’s kind-hearted response was something of a surprise then so too was the absence of Queen Camilla’s name from the congratulatory missive. Queen Camilla, the MoS has been told, is among those ‘leading the anti-York faction’, closely followed by Prince William, who remains furious at the way his uncle’s misdemeanours have cast a shadow across the monarchy he will one day inherit. According to the source: ‘She took a back seat on the scandal for quite a while out of deference to the King’s familial loyalties and to his health. But as the King’s health has improved she was instrumental in pushing him to act.’ More recently, she is said to have formed the opinion that Eugenie, who is a director of Mayfair art gallery Hauser & Wirth, and Beatrice should stop using their titles, albeit on a voluntary basis.
Eugenie hasn’t been in contact with her father in months: Eugenie is said to have left it to her scandal-ridden mother to share news of a new Baby Brooksbank by phone with her 66-year-old father, the erstwhile Duke of York. While Fergie was one of the first to hear of the pregnancy, I am told that Eugenie has not been in touch with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor since he was stripped of his titles and kicked out of Royal Lodge in Windsor. ‘Andrew found out that he was to be a grandpa again via Sarah,’ says the source.
Sarah & Andrew aren’t issuing statements: ‘Sarah is in hiding, so it wouldn’t have been appropriate for her to talk about the expected baby publicly,’ one of her old friends said last week. ‘But of course she was one of the first to hear the news, directly from Eugenie. They spoke at length. This is what mothers and daughters do.’
How Prince William feels: Prince William, too, is said to be concerned about his cousins’ links to Epstein, a subject on which both have maintained an uncomfortable silence. According to the source: ‘William was keen to keep the girls close and not let them be tainted by the sins of their father and the stupidity of both parents, but the Epstein revelations mean he has abandoned that plan. The way he and Kate have pointedly not publicly welcomed the baby news is a sign of how things have changed.’
Line of succession: The impending arrival of Eugenie’s third child has also heaped further pressure on the ongoing debate about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s place in the line of succession. Calls for him to be removed have extended to suggestions that the entire House of York, including Beatrice, Eugenie and their descendants, should suffer the same brutal fate. While Eugenie is currently 12th in line to the throne, her new baby will be 15th, displacing Prince Edward who, unlike his nieces, is a working royal, clocking up 313 official engagements in 2025.
Camilla wants all of them out of the line of succession: The Queen has apparently concluded that all of the Yorks, including Beatrice, Eugenie and their children, should be excluded from the royal line. ‘Her attitude is that they are all a stain on the monarchy,’ says the source. However, when it comes to his younger brother, the King is said to be caught between a rock and a hard place.
The drumbeat of “eliminate all of the Yorks from the line of succession” is getting louder by the day, especially given that Eugenie’s Baby #3 will soon be ahead of Prince Edward and Princess Anne in the succession. While I think it’s likely that, in the next few years, Andrew will be removed from the line of succession, I kind of doubt that King Charles will remove Eugenie, Beatrice and their children. Now, a Scooter King might try, and when he does… well, say goodbye to the whole “royal blood is magic” thing. If someone can be removed from the succession just because their father is a degenerate criminal, then the line of the succession is going to have to remove a lot of people. The fact that Camilla is in some dark corner, leading the anti-York contingency is certainly interesting too, because Camilla used to be a great cheerleader for both Andrew and Sarah just a few years ago. Anyway, I’ve argued that both Eugenie and Beatrice need to get the hell out of there and I still believe it. F–k those titles and f–k royal privilege. Just get out of there and start new lives with your families.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, Backgrid.
- Princess Eugenie attends The “Together At Christmas” Carol Service at Westminster Abbey on December 08, 2023 in London, England. Spearheaded by The Princess of Wales, and supported by The Royal Foundation, the service is a moment to bring people together at Christmas time and recognise those who have gone above and beyond to help others throughout the year.,Image: 827900575, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Chris Jackson / Avalon
- Princess Eugenie at Cheltenham Festival Day 2, Wednesday, Cheltenham Racecourse, Gloucestersehire UK,Image: 975010927, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Jules Annan/Avalon
- Cheltenham, UNITED KINGDOM – Zara and Mike Tindall attend Day 2 of the Cheltenham Festival 2025 alongside Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank. The royal couples enjoy a day at the prestigious horse racing event. Pictured: Zara Tindall, Mike Tindall, Princess Eugenie, Jack Brooksbank BACKGRID USA 12 MARCH 2025 USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- Celebrities attend the Dior fashion show during the Paris Menswear Fall/Winter 2024-2025 Featuring: Princess Eugenie of York Where: Paris, France When: 19 Jan 2024 Credit: Jerome Dominé/Abaca Press/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Royal Family attend day two of Royal Ascot 2024 at Ascot Racecourse on June 19, 2024 in Ascot, England Featuring: Princess Eugenie of York When: 19 Jun 2024 Credit: Cover Images
- Sarah, Duchess of York with her daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie during a visit to the Teenage Cancer Trust unit at University College Hospital, London Featuring: Princess Eugenie, Sarah, Duchess of York, Princess Beatrice Where: London, United Kingdom When: 23 Apr 2025 Credit: Aaron Chown/PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- Day Four of Royal Ascot Meeting 2025 Ascot Featuring: Sarah Duchess of York and Princess Eugenie Where: Ascot, United Kingdom When: 20 Jun 2025 Credit: Cover Images
- Day five of Royal Ascot meeting Featuring: Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank Where: Ascot, United Kingdom When: 21 Jun 2025 Credit: Cover Images
- Day five of Royal Ascot meeting Featuring: Princess Eugenie Where: Ascot, United Kingdom When: 21 Jun 2025 Credit: Cover Images





















When did Camilla take a back seat about familial issues. She has interfered with Charles relationship with his kids especially harry. The York princesses should not leave line of succession.ever.and they need to keep titles
Do they understand the danger of removing titles? If one can be removed, they all can be removed. The less said and speculated about the York sisters, the better. They are digging the monarchy’s grave with remarkable speed.
Camilla has never been nice to younger women, to put it mildly. No surprise that she’d be against the York sisters. She’s always been about getting what she wants, being unscrupulous and generally a vicious bitch.
Camilla is never nice. Full stop.
I think Andrew and his ex fergie were invited to more events just to spite the sussexes.
100%. They knew more about the Andrew mess than they are letting on but didn’t care until they started to get called out for it. And now it’s all about “morality”. Please.
Of course Charles would want any positive publicity associated with a pregnancy announcement. If he could find a way for someone to get married, he’d happily celebrate that, too.
And that is why we keep hearing about Peter Phillips’ impending nuptials.
I don’t think Camilla’s opinion on titles is relevant since she only has hers because they blackmailed the dying queen and paid off AMW lawsuit so the gory details of his raping trafficked minors and women would stay buried. I’m not a fan of titles for anyone but if someone as vile as Camilla has one then why can’t the others that aren’t officially “under arrest” keep them?
I honestly hope they do strip their titles because it’ll hasten the downfall of the whole institution. The entire point is that there is no picking and choosing and people lower in the birth order will get knocked even further down when babies are born. That’s how hereditary monarchies work.
And if they’re going to pick and choose because people have committed crimes (or they want to remove the children of royal criminals) then they’d better take a closer look at those bags of cash and choked staffers belonging to the current king. (Not to mention the E-files and what other royals are in those files and/or knew about what was going on!!)
And also everything Scooter has been up to, including all of those rumors about missing women on the royal estates or about what happened to his own wife in December 2024.
This sound like the usual bs from the fail and putting camilla at the center is an attack on her. Also, I prefer the fighting within than trashing the Sussexes.
NO way on earth would the late Queen have allowed her granddaughters to be stripped of their titles, even acknowledging their father’s disgrace. She was a stickler. If anyone should be stripped of a title, it’s Camilla, who lied about not wanting one for over a decade, whilst scheming with shady press advisors paid by Charles to rehabilitate her image, and, as Hypocrisy pointed out, only obtaining one in exchange for Charles signing off on the settlement that the late Queen offered Virginia to go silent during the Jubilee year.
Do I think they all deserve to be stripped yes, this is one giant coverup. They financially benefitted leveraging their Royal Titles. Both directly and indirectly. On top of knowing young women were being trafficked. This was an open secret.
But clearly the real problem to the Royal Family is Meghan selling Jam never using her title. The hypocrisy of it all.
His daughters would have been the last to know. No one would want to tell them.
There has been talk in royal forums for years that Bea (not sure about Eugenie) was assaulted at least once while underage on a trip with Andrew. All covered up, possibly in exchange for money to his Pitch at the Palace. Outside possibility these two awful parents trafficked their own daughters.
William needs to remember that him talking about removing titles will only remind people that William’s title can be removed as well.
Imagine a whole ass home wrecker who did everything in her power to destroy this line with her trampling ways now wants to decide who should stay and who should be set adrift. As for Willy , oh please as if his hands are clean in any of that mess earth shit donors anyone
IK,R? “Her attitude is that they are all a stain on the monarchy.” Riiiiiiight … but a shameless, trifling woman who interfered in a marriage and was the king’s mattress for decades is A-OK. Not a stain at all.
Weren’t there all those stories about William being concerned for Andrew’s mental health? Odd how there’s been no such stories about William and his cousins, one who is heavily pregnant. Likely he does want o strip them of their titles but it’s bizarre that we’ve gotten so few stories about any sympathy towards them. Guess there’s none. And yet there were stories about his sympathy for Andrew. Odd.
Interesting that Camilla is being publicly fingered in these palace intrigues? Does this represent a failure of camouflage, or is she feeling so confident she doesn’t think she needs to hide, anymore?
To me it seems like a story put out by KP to test the water re removing the titles of the York princesses. If there is a negative reaction to it then Camilla will be blamed but if there is a positive one then William can take joint credit.
The notion that Camilla should be one deciding on who should have titles is very off-putting to me. I’m not sure where the idea that Camilla was ever supportive of the Yorks comes from because it was clear that she didn’t approve of them when she decided not to attend Eugenie’s wedding.
Woman who snagged her title the, er, “old fashioned” way (and against Queen Elizabeth II’s explicit, in writing, not rumored — not ‘revealed by a close friend after her death” — wishes) wants to strip two, actual blood princesses from using their titles by taking advantage of their father’s scandal to furher clear the field? Oh, that’s rich.
I cannot stand this woman. She absolutely knows the more members of Charles’s family she humiliates and alienates, the more she isolates him and consolidates her influence. Diana had her clocked from the start and William will not treat her kindly.
The irony of Camilla the whorse calling anyone else a “stain” is perfect. After she and Charles chose to destroy his marriage with Diana with their adulterous ways, she doesn’t have a hoof to stand on.
I’m tired of all this “remove him/her from the line of succession” nonsense about the Yorks or the Sussexes. That’s the whole point of a hereditary monarchy: you’re in the line of succession because you’re born through the right vagina, not because people like you or because you’re “respectable.” Otherwise, we might as well elect the Head of State. These people are going to kill the monarchy.
The known line of succession is thousands of people long. The press (and Bill and Cam) need to get over the idea they get to decide who is in or out.
I don’t think it would matter much for Eugenie if she were to lose her title. But Beatrice probably needs the title to keep her husband.
Camilla is 10x times more of a stain on the monarchy than Beatrice and Eugenie…Beatrice and eugenie did nothing whilst Camilla at one point had destroyed the monarchy
I’m honestly gobsmacked that anyone in the institution would seriously consider interfering in the Line of Succession as it would dismantle a fundamental pillar of the hereditary principle.
I’m no monarchist and despise Andrew yet the removal of his Prince status and title (the dukedom removal is a charade) was a very dangerous precedent for Charles to set, it demonstrates that the title is meaningless and not an inherent birthright, only bestowed because of a lengthy paragraph written by a King in 1917.
It’s going to be hilarious if they destroy themselves from within by exposing the entire monarchy as being insubstantial and based on establishment propaganda and meaningless privilege.
Several titles were stripped from German descendants of Queen Victoria after WWI so it’s not without precedence. It was done by Act of Parliament under the Title Deprivation Act of 1917. It even included an Irish peerage that was non-royal.
“Let he who be without sin caste the first stone,” Camilla committed adultery, she should leave the York sisters alone. Camilla can concentrate on her own children and leave Charles to sort out his own family.
very strange that the tampon mistress who has a stolen title would want to take them away from others. Camilla has been scheming since months. something is brewing.
That’s rich. The girls who were born into their titles should give them up, while the whorse that Charles rode in on should keep hers?
This is the Pandora’s box they opened by experimenting with it on Meghan and Harry and giving the media blood in the water with the Byzantine announcement of their titles and how they can use them. Now was really only the direct heir, their spouse, and their eldest can expect to go through life without constant speculation about their title, workload, place in the line of succession. And since fewer and fewer members of the extended family will be supported by the monarch, they will have to get jobs or marry people with jobs that the media will then forensically examine and make up alleged improprieties.
Camilla,has no royal children with Charles. She can be queen do w a g e r and that’s that.
I’d like to remove all royals from the line of any succession and abolish them, but in the absence of that please leave the princesses alone. However rich and royal you are, it’s horrible to hear about your dad’s debauchery and see the media coverage. From my limited knowledge they didn’t do anything wrong and should be left out of it. When is trump going to face any investigation or accountability btw?
Why should Camilla care who is in the line of succession? It does not reflect upon her at all.
Once Charles is gone, she really doesn’t have a horse in this race.
Given that Camilla herself has no royal blood, this is an odd stance. She’s not even a Queen Mother. God knows what Will plans for her when Charles dies.
Annnd this is why Anne made sure her mother changed the rules so that she’s never have to curtsy to Camilla. She’s heinous. Trying to make her, of all people, the face of who or who doesn’t keep the titles and rights they were born with when she only has her because of schemes and abuse is offensive. Mainly because I think they see it as the Trojan horse to also punish Harry & Meghan. May they pull down their entire house of cards then.
Is this a warning to Andrew/Sarah? Historically, you only were removed from succession by, what? Treason? And Catholicism. And even if A is found guilty of treason, I don’t think it strips the kids. “It shows us doing something! And maybe we can attack H&M too and no one will notice!” This people are ridiculous.
Camilla, of all people, does not get to complain about anyone causing a scandal and a stain in the monarchy.
Removing titles would hardly be unique to the British royals. The Danes did it to the children of Prince Joachim. Princess Madeleine and Prince Carl Philip’s kids lost their HRH titles and Prince Edward’s children have never used their Prince and Princess titles. King Felipe of Spain stripped his sister of her Dukedom after her husband was convicted. It seems to be the way most monarchies are moving.