Telegraph: Duchess Meghan is engaging in a ‘toe-curling campaign’ to woo Britain

For years now, the British media has treated the Duchess of Sussex like every single thing she says, does, posts or wears has an ulterior motive, a hidden agenda which only the British press can properly decode. According to the British press, a thing is never just a thing when it comes to Meghan. What’s remarkable is how ulterior motives are never ascribed to the Windsors, whose raison d’etre is to operate through coded messages and hidden agendas. All of which to say, the British press is furiously trying to “understand” what Meghan is really doing back in the UK. She can’t simply exist and be a mom and do Pilates at Soho Farmhouse. There must be another agenda at play and by god, the Telegraph will spend eight pages decoding the messages being sent from Kelly Zajfen’s Instagram. Seriously – the Telegraph had a long-read called “Meghan’s ‘bestie’ and the toe-curling campaign to woo the British public.” Toes are being curled because Meghan took her friend to a pub, you guys. I’ll spare you the bulk of the histrionics but here are the basics:

First came American talk-show host Ellen DeGeneres and her wife, Portia de Rossi, then came the Duchess of Sussex – repatriating her Duke – but in the past week we have seen a new Californian attracting attention in and around the Cotswolds: one Kelly McKee Zajfen.

It was her own Instagram post that drew eyes. A carousel of 14 photographs depicting a trip to see her best friend in England, along with her baby boy, Jack. It received almost 10 times her standard amount of engagement. Why? Highlights include sweet pictures of Zajfen holding baby Jack on an estate… then her playing mah jong with a giggling brunette wearing a baseball cap and flip flops while enjoying a glass of white wine: coy, but immediately identifiable as the Duchess of Sussex.

Further evidence demonstrating the wholesomeness of the new Sussex life here included images of Meghan holding Jack by a demolished plate of fish ’n’ chips in the pub and Harry cuddling him on a rug on the ground. Then, a gushing caption. So positive. So grateful. So… on message?

The post raised two questions. For the British public: just who is Zajfen? It seemed she had popped up out of nowhere. And for the ever-suspect press: detectors will have been set off by the post’s concluding words, which read: “To everyone we’ve met or bumped into, thank you for being so loving to my friend. It’s been beautiful to witness. She missed you too!”

It seemed unlikely that Meghan had not approved the post, suggesting Zajfen could be part of the Duchess’s new PR plan, now that she’s back in the UK with a less-than-jolly British public to win over.

“It makes it read as a public communication,” says Lauren Beeching, a leading crisis PR who has represented major politicians, chief executives and celebrities. “At that point, the caption moves beyond documenting a visit and addresses an audience on Megan’s behalf.”

I understand from Sussex sources that while the Duchess was likely made aware of the post ahead of its publication, she had no direct involvement in the caption. Sussex backers point out the pair are best friends and, of course, support each other. They also note that Meghan already has a PR (Liam Maguire in the UK and Sunshine Sachs Morgan & Lylisin in the US). Still, interest in Zajfen (pronounced z-eye-fin) has been piqued.

…Last week’s post was nothing out of the ordinary in that sense, but it was the first real insight into Meghan’s life back in Britain. As a result, many felt like she was trying to deliver a message. Zajfen, after all this time, is a safe pair of hands for a debut look. So what of the suggestion that Zajfen is now part of the PR plan? Sussex sources say it’s just not true. But others say Meghan has long relied on personal connections to try and win public favour.

“She’s [Meghan’s] always communicated via friends. I don’t think there’s a turning point at all. I think it’s part of her playbook,” says James Henderson, a crisis PR who worked with Sarah Ferguson for over a decade and understands life on the border of The Firm. Beeching suggests there’s a clear strategy behind posts such as Zajfen’s. “Using Kelly’s voice to make that message feel more personal and credible allows us to benefit from a positive story without [Meghan] having to make the argument for herself.”

With Meghan’s approval rating in the UK languishing at less than 20 per cent, if she wants to be a powerful public figure, there is clearly work to be done – and a long game to map out. Henderson sees her separation from the Crown as an opportunity. “Not being part of the royal machine gives her more freedom to do it her way,” he says. “She should take up a big role with a global charity, similar to what she did before she was married, for a cause that she strongly, strongly believes in.” That, he says, would give her a vehicle to communicate, similar to Harry’s Invictus Games.

Those who know her claim that Meghan is very happy in the UK and that her and Prince Harry’s children are enjoying their new adventure. They say she accepts there’s always going to be noise around them, but that her experience in the past month has been positive and they have all settled in well. And Zajfen? Perhaps she will gain a whole new British audience. After all, we live in an era of self-promotion: bigging up your friends is par for the course, even if, for us British, it can seem cringeworthy.

[From The Telegraph]

Sometimes, it feels like British commentators and journalists really are talking down to their readers as if they’re idiots or newborn babies unfamiliar with the idea of “posting a supportive and pleasant caption on social media.” Kelly clearly visited her friend to see how she was doing, then Kelly posted some photos from the trip and that was it. The reason the Telegraph (and the Mail, and the Sun and the Mirror) are all obsessing over Kelly’s Instagram is because Meghan hasn’t attended any public events and she doesn’t seem eager to live any kind of “public life” in England. Because these same people ascribing ulterior motives to Meghan are shocked that she isn’t begging for their attention. They keep saying “well, Meghan’s approval rate is really low!” Who cares? Meghan certainly doesn’t. She’s doing the same thing she did in California – living her life quietly while the same people obsess over everything she does and says.

Photos courtesy of Kelly Zajfen’s Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Telegraph: Duchess Meghan is engaging in a ‘toe-curling campaign’ to woo Britain”

  1. sunnyside up says:

    I expect to see these silly stories in the Wail, Express and the Sun but now they are also in the Torygraph and The Indy. I can’t help worrying what is happening to the British press.

  2. Tessa says:

    Approval ratings again. Derangers must take those polls.

  3. Shiela Kerr says:

    So agree, Meghan is just living her life, entertaining friends while selling her products. The gutter rats are the ones with the problem.

  4. Nanea says:

    The Torygraph gets more toe-curlingly embarrassing each and every day that ends in -y, just like the Fail, the Scum, the Terror, the Excess.

    “leading crisis PR”
    There’s no crisis threatening the Sussexes — unlike TOB Scooter Prince Bulliam and Mumblina “recurring canceritis” McButtons. So how about offering unsolicited advice to them?

    “crisis PR who has worked with Sarah Ferguson”
    Meaning this guy isn’t qualified to speak on anything, might as well have remained silent.

    I just can’t with the BM, it’s not like the Sussexes are taxpayer-funded billionaires who are workshy, functionally illiterate alcoholics or barely able to mumble in remedial English.

  5. Puff Updater says:

    The British press seems so cringeworthy to us Yanks.

    • AnneStavely says:

      Imagine making your living writing such drivel, like this lady in the telegraph. I’d be embarrassed down to my boots.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      I clocked the anti-American shade as well. “Everything these Americans do is so cringe worthy”. Americans tend to support their friends. So cringe worthy. SMDH.

    • GMHQ says:

      H&M NEED TO DISMISS THE COMMS STAFFERS. Now that they are so chatty with the British media they can invent quotes from nameless sources and imply that the Sussex comms staff are briefing even it isn’t them. They were better off when they banned all communications with the British media.

  6. Tis True, Tis True says:

    William would never play with a baby like that. Just saying.

    Creating a running narrative about someone where all their actions are interpreted as being centered on you is somewhere in the DSM, I’m sure.

    • Kasztanka says:

      He never would have done it on his own, but you know—aside from wanting to be king so he could torment his brother and his family even more—he’s always wanted to be just like Harry, and with Harry’s wife by his side, no less :))
      That’s why you can bet on seeing a photo op of William rolling around on the ground with some kid. Since he was capable of stooping to such cringeworthy behavior as “copying” Harry—who had wept in Ukraine over fallen soldiers—you can expect anything from that idiot.
      Remember that?
      William nearly burst into tears on camera during an October 2025 interview with Rhian Mannings, who had lost both her husband and son in a short span of time. Those fake tears came as the biggest shock to Rhian herself—something she couldn’t hide on the recording, as she wore an expression of shock mixed with near-laughter. Why? Because she had already told William that whole story on camera two years prior; choosing that specific tale to try and rival Harry’s genuine emotion in Ukraine was incredibly embarrassing. Not to mention that the very idea of ​​doing something like that just to compete with his brother is so stupid and shameful—I’d be too embarrassed to show my face in public after such a display of stupidity. Well, that’s William for you; he’s simply not capable of anything better :)))

  7. Gemini says:

    So the British press, who base their credibility solely on their contact with unnamed and unfaced “friends of the royal family”, think Meghan’s real long time friend with a face and a name and evidenced proximity to Meghan is playing PR games?

    You are giving away the game stupid Telegraph. You’ve been using “the friends of” trope for PR for the royals since “palace source” became a joke.

    You want Meghan friendless and unhappy on British soil so bad that you want her to doll herself up and present herself to you. In your dreams!

  8. Amy Bee says:

    What is this and why is the Telegraph behaving like Meghan doesn’t have her own IG. If she wants to say something she will do it on her own page. I agree with Kaiser that the British press don’t understand why Meghan is not making public appearances. These people are desperate for her to do public events and are puzzled that she’s not living up to their assumptions. I hope she never does any public events in the UK.

  9. Jan says:

    I remembered she was first living in England, and the posh set thought Meghan would be begging for invitations to their dinners, and when they went to dinners, they sat together and drove them nuts.
    Chucky invited her to view Art work show and didn’t tell her, the press was going to be there and she pulled out, apparently Chucky was livid, no one turns him down.
    The tabloids, should give up on Meghan, because they can’t control her.
    Other children would’ve been embarrassed by the stunts they parents pull, and put out we are getting along well, but Meghan sold the wedding suits she bought for her father, and if anyone thinks she is sucking to Chucky, I’ve a bridge to sell you.

  10. MidnightSuperNova says:

    They have their future lazy queen lying to the public, talking about ‘I do the dishes,’ and here they are writing about Meghan spending time with her friends, claiming it’s a calculated campaign to win the British people over. Okay 👍🏾 😑🙄

    Girl, bye 👋🏾

  11. Pumpkin says:

    I agree. Meghan is doing what she was doing in Montecito – doing whatever she wants whenever she wants. There were reports she was out and about. We just didn’t see it except maybe once every few months?

    If she was really doing a PR campaign then she’d be out doing public engagements. She isn’t.

  12. s808 says:

    it’s very confusing to them that Meghan doesn’t care to be doing public events in the UK. Her and Harry have basically flipped: She was more visible in the US while he worked more behind the scenes. H was still out and about in the US sometimes but without security, I don’t think they’ll see Meghan very much.

  13. Eurydice says:

    Wow, that’s a whole lot of words. And “If she wants to be a powerful public figure…” Who said she does?

  14. Jais says:

    Meghan is eating fish and chips and selling out chocolate. Please. The only cringe thing here is this news article.

  15. JFerber says:

    Man, I hate the English.

  16. QuiteContrary says:

    LOL at quoting a crisis PR “expert” who’s worked with Fergie … dude, you might want to focus on your own client, who’s a PR nightmare.

    Also, there’s no crisis here, so we don’t need the input of crisis comms professionals on Meghan. She’s protecting her peace and living life accordingly.

    Though that’s probably viewed as a crisis by these weirdo Brits.

  17. Graphinya Heather says:

    I actually love this headline, and it’s another vocab difference between American and British English.

    Here in America, toe curling is amazing. For example, toe curling sex is the best sex you’ve ever had.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment