Warner Bros tries to say that only European audiences will ‘get’ Digger & Tom Cruise

It’s been a minute since any studio has dealt with such a massive bomb like Digger. Yes, there have been box-office bombs in recent years, but none of them came with Tom Cruise and what he hoped would be an awards-season full of lead-actor nominations. It’s truly crazy how that we went from “Digger might get Tom Cruise another Oscar nomination” to “Digger is the biggest critical and financial disaster in YEARS,” and it all happened in a matter of days. As I said yesterday, it’s now clear that Digger should have been made as an art-house film with a small budget, but because Cruise and Alejandro Iñárritu were attached, suddenly they were working with a $180 million budget and no one was saying “no” to anyone. Well, the blame game continues, as does the haphazard crisis management around Digger. The Hollywood Reporter points out that Warner Bros is trying hard to get international audiences to embrace this disaster:

Warner Bros. rolled out a new ad for Digger that is trying yet another approach to market the tough-to-sell Alejandro G. Iñárritu film, which just debuted to the lowest opening weekend box office for a movie starring Tom Cruise in 19 years.

The online ad shows a series of glowing quotes from critics from various countries and contrasts them with negative reviews from U.S. critics. The sort-of implication: The rest of the world loves this movie — it’s just dumb Americans who fail to appreciate its genius. At the start of the ad, Tom Cruise as Digger Rockwell says, “America has stood beside the world in its darkest of hours,” to which Riz Ahmed’s character shoots back, “Not anymore.”

Then comes the succession of critic quotes alongside a flag representing the critic’s country. The first is from a Mexican YouTuber who called the film “Epic, Extraordinary and Biting,” followed by a Playlist quote, along with an American flag, which called the film “Grotesque, Deliberately Tacky.” Later, there’s a French critic who calls Digger “A Gem of Intelligence,” followed by The New York Post calling it “An Unintentionally Bad Movie.” The ad concludes with Cruise’s character declaring, “You decide which!”

Digger is expected to gross only around $8 million at the domestic weekend box office, which is even lower than the studio’s meager $12-$15 million prediction, and certainly leagues lower than the film’s $125 million projected budget.

Is it actually true, however, that the international press likes Digger more than the American press? There may be a little truth to this. While Rotten Tomatoes has the film at 50 percent positive, French aggregation site AlloCiné currently gives the film an average press rating of 3.2 out of 5 across 30 reviews. The two metrics aren’t directly comparable, but the French score suggests a somewhat warmer critical reception. Several top critics in Britain and Australia were notably warm towards the film, though both countries, certainly, had dissenters as well.

[From THR]

They’re trying to “Jerry Lewis” Tom Cruise, you guys. Tom Cruise: famously NOT embraced by American audiences, so he has to seek fame and fortune in Europe! While THR tries to put a bow on this strategy, Variety pointed out something interesting, namely that the international release won’t help. Per Variety, “Foreign audiences were supposed to be the saving grace after domestic projections began to nosedive in the days leading up to release. Cruise’s movies usually make the majority of their money at the international box office anyway…It turns out, that wasn’t totally true. The movie was equally rejected overseas with a paltry $12 million from 73 markets. Ouch.”

Variety also points to Cruise’s promotional strategy as one of the reasons why Digger flopped so hard. That’s one area where I’ll put up an argument: I was surprised by Tom’s promotion and how eager he was to go out and sell Digger like he’s an up-and-coming actor. He stopped by Graham Norton’s show, Jennifer Hudson’s show, he appeared on GQ and gave them an in-depth interview, he did some of those cutesy internet videos, and on and on. He hustled pretty hard, harder than he has in years. It just didn’t make a difference because the movie is bad.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images and screencaps from ‘Digger’ trailer.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

39 Responses to “Warner Bros tries to say that only European audiences will ‘get’ Digger & Tom Cruise”

  1. YankeeDoodles says:

    True story, I saw a preview for this film over the summer when I went to see The Odyssey and it was so *awful* and so utterly cringe, I was momentarily rooted to my seat, eyes wide, rapidly blinking, going — huh??? Surely this steaming pile of turd is just the lead-in to a satire of filmmaking, like a meta read on studio politics, like every treatment of Hollywood contains one embedded inset plot device that is The Bomb, from which the protagonists recoil and then rebound? ….my brain was frantically filling in the gaps left by the void that you survey in the presence of the Truly Bad, submitted For Your Consideration. I mean. You can do an art house epic, but you can’t do it with Tom Cruise. I don’t blame the director. He cast the wrong guy.

    • EM says:

      Tom Cruise has done profitable art house films, albeit with much smaller budgets. Eyes Wide Shut, Magnolia… He is a good actor, this movie just didn’t land.

      • Lawrenceville says:

        Tom Cruise Mapother is way too overrated in my very humble opinion. That’s all Ive got.

  2. Tessa says:

    Cruise would have been better off doing a sequel to Jerry McGuire

  3. Barbara says:

    I guess I’m one of those “dumb Americans” because even after reading the spoilers, I don’t get this pile of dung.

  4. Gemini says:

    In Europe Inarritu have a high brow reputation among those followers of “auteur cinema”. Biutiful, Babel, The Revenant, Birdman were well received as art house movies with Oscar nominations. His lead actors generally get nominated for an Oscar. I guess Tom Cruise wanted to take advantage of that as he definitely wants his Oscar. In my neck of woods which is not America, this is promoted as an Inarritu movie. I agree it should have been produced as an indie.

  5. Carol says:

    So, forcing all the Scientology slaves to see this movie won’t help it break even?

  6. KNB says:

    I just want to drop this little item of interest on this forum, where Cruise is largely disliked (rightly) because of Scientology. I was listening to a podcast from the New Yorker called “The Critics at Large” and the episode was about Tom Cruise, Digger, his filmology. And one of the critics mentioned near the end that Tom was trying to make a movie about space with Doug Liman, and Cruise needed to get permission from Trump for the necessary NASA and federal government approvals, and Cruise declined to do so and killed the film. Also, he turned down a 2025 Kennedy Centre Honour from Trump.

    I hate the Scientology still as well, so I was pleasantly surprised to read the between the lines here that Cruise hates Trump and unlike others won’t kiss the ring.

    • Bev says:

      This. Give credit where credit is due.

      • Lorelei says:

        This actually pleasantly surprised me! I can’t believe that he turned down an “honor” from Tr*mp, but as you said, credit when credit is due.

        Although this new strategy of insinuating that Americans are too stupid to understand his “high art” is not it. That’s going to backfire on him tremendously.

    • Little Red says:

      I remember Cruise turning down the Kennedy Center Honor. Didn’t know about the outer space movie. Okay, so one good thing about him.

  7. NoBS Please says:

    Totally unsurprised French critics loved it.

    France is the European capital of pretentious film makers, cinema critics and self-appointed “intellectuals” who love anything incomprehensible and absurd claiming to be high art.

    Digger probably fits right in with the average nonsensical arrogant and lame French film.

    (other than that, and their lax attitude towards child and women abusers, I love the French!)

    • Flowerlake says:

      I love how this is a USA movie with USA promotion now dragging in a European country and suddenly France gets blamed because they gave some lukewarm reviews 😀

      A 3.2 is hardly “loving”.

      France has been a friend to the USA many times, even before the USA was a thing. Maybe they don’t worship the USA like some Americans think they should be worshipped, but they have often be more honest than the flatterers. See: the Iraq War amongst other things.

      I am not French, but I often watch arthouse movies, amongst which French movies. A lot of them are just fun or poignant. Arthouse movies are often just movies with a smaller budget or spoken in a language that is not English. It doesn’t automatically mean they’re pretentious.

      I recommend “Je ne suis pas un homme facile” (I am not an easy man), about a sexist man who ends up in a world where everything is switched. So there is supposed equality between women and men, but you still see the difference, only this time it’s the men who work + do the household tasks etc. The woman who stays seated watching telly while the man goes out to do that last minute errand etc. It really made me realize some things that I took for granted should not be taken for granted.

      Also, I recommend watching more movies from other countries in general. Movies are not automatically pretentious just because people don’t speak English in it.

  8. Lucy says:

    When I saw the previews, I hated the visual style viscerally and on sight. Beyond just the cruise of it all, and the freaking weirdness, I am not going to subject myself to gray but also somehow fluorescent lighting in a movie.

    • SarahCS says:

      The more I have seen/read the less interest I’ve had in this film but I absolutely agree. My first reaction was to the colour/tone and no way would I spend any amount of time being subjected to that.

    • Lorelei says:

      Thank you for articulating what I’ve been thinking— “gray but also somehow fluorescent” nails it!

      But I’m just a dumb American who doesn’t understand why this is somehow good.

  9. Deadnotsleeping says:

    I still kind of want to see this after reading Sarah’s review at Laineygossip, but I’ll wait until it’s on a streamer in case I hate it. It’s 129 minutes long which is longer than my patience if it’s truly awful. I really enjoy most of the supporting cast.

    • Nuks says:

      I listened to the big picture podcast that went into great depth about the movie because I knew I wasn’t going to see it but I was curious just the same. They did say that the filmmaking is extraordinary and the production design is just amazing, so I would suggest cinefiles who want to see those elements in their appropriate perspective hit up the theater. But maybe bring noise canceling headphones in case you just want to look at it but not hear the ten minute soliloquies.

  10. Jason says:

    GO. SEE. YOUR. DAUGHTER. YOU. POS.

  11. JFerber says:

    So does this mean he’s applying for citizenship? Good. Hope they’ll take him.

  12. Lala11_7 says:

    Didn’t like it when Kubrick did it…and I don’t like it with Cruise

  13. KC2 says:

    Given the times, who wants to see a dark comedy about a megalomaniac? They’re thick on the ground as it is.

  14. Leah says:

    You guys…this movie is actually brilliant. And I say that with my “eyes wide open” about Cruise. If you read comments about this movie from people who’ve seen it (outside of this site), you will see mostly very positive reviews. It’s really bothering me that so many people won’t see this film because of all the “bomb” and “flop” headlines, which are strictly about the revenue. This is a thinking person’s film, and it’s meant to make us all uncomfortable with the choices we’ve made, individually and collectively. I really urge folks to see it. I’d put it in the same genre and calibre as the 2024 film “Civil War”.

    • AlpineWitch says:

      Majority of people likes Cruise in action films, and (I read a comment about this on Reddit and agree with it) not many are willing to pay the extortionate price of a cinema ticket risking to dislike the film.

      My husband and I go to cinema only for carefully selected films. Dune 3? Yeah. Digger? Nah, pass – we’ll check it on streaming.

  15. Molly says:

    I think it was that GQ cover that sunk this ship.

  16. Flowerlake says:

    European here that often goes to arthouse films and knows many others that do:

    We’re more enthusiastic about Cycle of Love than about this. I hear nobody talking about it and most people don’t see it as arthouse but as big budget Hollywood.

    And no, arthouse movies are often not pretentious at all. They’re just movies with a smaller budget + often from countries with names that do not start with a U.
    Many are fun and a good night out.

  17. Cadbury Eggs says:

    Dang. I wanna see Digger now just to see how bad it really is…. 😂😂

  18. jferber says:

    Warner Brothers is doing itself no good by implying that American audiences are too stupid to understand and appreciate Tom Cruise’s new movie. That is a very European take and Americans don’t like to be told how simple and unsophisticated they are.

  19. North of Boston says:

    “This is a thinking person’s film, and it’s meant to make us all uncomfortable with the choices we’ve made, individually and collectively. ”

    While I appreciate your thoughtful take, I’m a thinking person who has been paying attention to what is going on the the world, and I’m already uncomfortable with the choices humanity has collectively made RE climate change, human rights, resource consumption and destruction and have been trying to make changes to my own behavior.
    I don’t need Tom Cruise and Co to do that for me, and I’m not interested in supporting his projects.

    I’m thinking I will not go see this.

  20. jferber says:

    North of Boston, Brava! Perfectly stated.

  21. Lau says:

    Yeah, no thanks we don’t want to ‘get’ him, his cult or his terrible make-up because he was too busy bullying the make-up artists on set for taking too much of his time. Bye !

  22. Debbye says:

    In a world full of ugly right now, this makes me smile. May all his movies be Digger ones

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment