TSA forces woman to painfully remove nipple rings with pliers

headerkekeke.JPG

Remember those traveling horror stories you used to hear about right after 9/11? Like the lady who was forced to drink her own breast milk to prove there was nothing in it? Apparently weird breast-related policies are still plaguing the Transportation Security Administration. Yesterday passenger Mandi Hamlin, 37, held a press conference with attorney Gloria Allred where she said she was humiliated last month after being forced to remove her two nipple rings behind a curtain at a Lubbock, Texas airport. Hamlin had to remove one of the rings with pliers – which was excruciatingly painful – all the while being subjected to the snickers from male TSA workers. Hamlin had offered to show a female TSA worker her piercings, but the employees insisted they had to be removed.

Hamlin and her lawyer, celebrity attorney Gloria Allred, said they want a public apology from the agency, as well as a guarantee that future passengers with piercings will be treated with dignity and respect. Allred pointed out that TSA’s Web site says passengers with piercings can undergo a pat-down inspection if they do not want to take their piercings out — an option she said Hamlin was never offered. “The conduct of TSA was cruel and unnecessary,” Allred told reporters at a news conference. “Last time that I checked, a nipple was not a dangerous weapon.” She said if an apology was not forthcoming, “Mandi is going to have to consider her legal options.”

“Ms. Hamlin did not want to remove her nipple piercings,” Allred said, reading from a letter she sent TSA. “After nipple rings are inserted, the skin can often heal around the piercing and the rings can be extremely difficult and painful to remove. In addition, once removed, the pierced skin may close up almost immediately, making it difficult and painful to reinsert the piercing.”

More officers were called over, and the group grew to four male and two female TSA officers, according to Hamlin. Also, a small crowd of onlookers had started to gather. The officers insisted that Hamlin remove the nipple rings, Allred said. “She felt humiliated by the scene that the TSA officers were making,” Allred said.

[From CNN]

The TSA is insisting their employees did everything right, but said they will change the policy so it doesn’t happen again in the future. Considering their website says passengers with body jewelry can undergo a pat down – yet Mandi Hamlin was forced to remove her rings with pliers instead – I’m not sure exactly how they can say the employees did everything right. The TSA also went out of their way to make sure they did not apologize to Hamlin, and just gave a bunch of bull “thanks for pointing that out” type comments instead.

Hamlin’s rings didn’t even set off the metal detector – but she was randomly pulled aside for additional security checks, and the hand-wand went off over her breasts. Normally the security personnel do a pretty good job, but in this case it sounds like they made a decision to humiliate this woman and not tell her about her own rights. I can’t imagine how humiliating and painful Hamlin’s experience must have been. It’s good that the TSA isn’t trying to insist that it’s a good policy, and has made it clear that they’ll change it. But they definitely owe Mandi Hamlin a very clear and remorseful apology.

footerekeke.JPG

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “TSA forces woman to painfully remove nipple rings with pliers”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. geronimo says:

    That is absolutely outrageous. And not even an apology. Sue them!! Now!

  2. anni says:

    yes, a nipple piercing is truly a thread to any country. imagine the damage. horny guys! phew!

    poor woman, i hope that she won´t suffer from nasty scars in that particular sensitive area.

  3. Cindy Kennedy says:

    I don’t think TWA can literally force someone to do this = all they can do is refuse to allow the passenger to board the plane.

    For myself, I would refuse and tell them I’d take another flight or DRIVE to where I am going.

    I know someone whose husband has an artificial leg, and it causes all kinds of problems with airport security – so much, that they have quit fying anywhere and drive anytime they want to go on a vaction. I understand airports need to be secure, but they take it way too far; and some of these airport personnel have overactive imaginations.

  4. nonentity says:

    Ow, ow, ow, ow, ow. Poor woman.

  5. Anna says:

    Outrageous. I hope she gets a good apology and hasn’t suffered any real health damages.

    Makes me wonder though… how did Christina Aguilera get through airport security all these years since 9/11? 😉

  6. Anonymous Realist says:

    Any moron who supports the TSA and thinks what they do makes ANY sense and adds ANY value or safety should read this:

    http://jetlagged.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/28/the-airport-security-follies/

    written a few months ago by a commercial pilot – wonderfully done.

  7. ER says:

    While I think America has become “sue-happy” I think this woman has every right to sue for punitive damages. And I agree with the above poster, I would have turned around and forgone my flight.

  8. xiaoecho says:

    By the look of her who ever would have guessed that she had nipple piercings?

    Un-PC I know but it was my first thought

    Hope she sues their arses to kingdom come

    Cindy……your friends husband should always board the plane in his knickers (boxers?)….that’ll give them something to think about

  9. RC says:

    unfortunately, she probably can’t sue the TSA. they’re very clear in all of the posted guidelines that the real say lies with local departments. If you have something like tiny embroidery scissors that are ok’ed by the TSA, it says in every piece of TSA literature that they might still get taken away from you at the airport. It ain’t right, but the TSA is pretty much shielded in this case.

    but seriously? if it needs pliers to take it out, it’s not a threat. and if there were male officers there, that is a SERIOUS breach of protocol, and probably the law.

  10. Toubrouk says:

    This is a textbook case of a critical failure of common sense. Since I know people working at an international airport, I just can’t figure the justification behind such a demand.

    I hope she will sue and win.

  11. sabine says:

    This is outrageous. I would have told them to shove it.

  12. Mairead says:

    But would you though? I’d love to think that I would say the same, but the truth is that humans are very, to the point of being overly, compliant with those we perceive as being in authority.

    You’re there, your bags are checked on, you’re in a hurry to get to your destination or home, you’re out of your element and suddenly you’re thrown a loop. Many more people would have been compliant in the heel of the hunt than perhaps we’d like to imagine.

    But these employees behaved disgustingly, preying on paranoia like that.

  13. Hollz says:

    From experience, i can say she will have some scars…. i know i do. I sure hope the pliers were sterilized…that’d be a NASTY infection…
    I hope she sues and wins!

  14. Ling says:

    Imagine if one of the holes became infected.

    What bugs me is that she offered to cooperate by showing her pearcings to a female. Did they think she had artillery implants, like the austin powers robots?

    Thank you for posting this story.

  15. Kattybitch says:

    What scares me is this is the fourth case I’ve heard recently of women being targeted at airports.

    There was the woman denied access to her flight because they believed her skirt was too short it was ‘deemed’ inappropriate.

    THere was the case of a group of girls who one of them started an altercation with a male passenger and her entire group was kicked off with police escorts (even though only ONE girl was doing anything) the male got to continue on with the flight with no repercussion.

    There was another case similar to this where flight attendants were rude and belittling to two women passengers because they believed they had too much to drink so they were being ‘boisterous and out of control’…for talking and laughing with each other in the waiting area to board the plane.

    What the hell is going on?

  16. MizLiz says:

    I would be on the phone to the best personal injury lawyer I could find. If that isn’t a personal injury, I don’t know what is.

  17. anon69 says:

    I’m confused-why did it take pliers to get the piercings out? I’m pierced and have taken mine out for xrays and such with no problem. Maybe hers were new…..I’ve had mine for about 8 years.
    I do agree that their behavior was a bit over the top and they do owe this woman an apology-especially since they tried to turn her into a freak show.

  18. rlr260 says:

    When my mother had a total knee replacement a few years ago, she was given a wallet card with an x-ray picture of the knee joint on it. She was to carry the picture to prove she was not a threat if her artificial joint set off security alarms. She never had any trouble with setting off metal detectors, but it was good to know she had an explanation at hand if she had needed it.

  19. Rianna says:

    thats disgusting. TSA officers dont get paid enough and are too power hungry and think they are so great. this is disgusting.

  20. Loob says:

    Infuriating. I would try to get their asses fired as well.

  21. Tia C says:

    That was absolutely wrong of them to do that, and it also doesn’t surprise me at all that it happened in Texas (giant eye roll), BUT on the other hand, I think piercing one’s sensitive areas is beyond lame and I really don’t feel sorry for her at all!

  22. Unbelievable! Agreed, TSA obviously decided to ridicule the woman instead of do their job.

  23. AndyShep says:

    If she put them in she can take them out. I don’t want my security compromised by her choices.

  24. alan says:

    if a metal detector is triggered, security cannot simply accept the persons explanation and let the through, neither can they simply deny them access. a woman has the right to privacy but all who travel by air have the right to security. nipple rings are no match to the threats we face in these times. sorry! We want our travel to be safe so small price!