Is there a person on a cell phone in a 1928 Charlie Chaplin film?


Footage is at 2:41, but watch the guy introduce it, he’s interesting and cute

People Magazine is running this bizarre video (above) from a Irish filmmaker who jokingly claims to have found evidence of a time traveler in the DVD extras accompanying a 1928 Charlie Chaplin film, The Circus. In the clip, a woman who looks like a man in drag is shown walking and talking on a small device that looks just like a modern cell phone. The filmmaker, George Clarke, very convincingly explains that he’s a film buff and has screened this footage to over a 100 people, none of whom can come up with an explanation for it.

I racked my brain for a moment and initially thought it might be a walkie talkie. They’re on a film set after all, and they would presumably have access to the latest technological advances, although a walkie talkie would be huge back then. The only problem is that walkie talkies weren’t invented until 1940. So why would someone be miming talking on something that didn’t exist back then? It’s kind of creepy.

Clarke does bring up something else it could be, but dismisses that theory – an AM/FM radio. Only this is what radios looked like in the late 20s. The first portable radio was invented in 1920, but again it was very bulky. This is surely an interesting mystery.

I was about to publish this with a big shrug, when I read a comment from a YouTube user that pretty much solves the mystery.

“Moviesunrated” writes “Search up “Western Electric Model 34A” on Google, and you’ll see there’s a hearing aid from 1925 that looks just like a mobile phone.” It does! There is a photo of that hearing aid below with more information here. I guess it’s just a hearing aid available at the time and not some mysterious technological advance that no one could have anticipated. In 2010 hearing aids are so tiny they fit deep in our ears and phones with cameras and internet access are about the size of that 1920s hearing aid. It’s only a matter of time before phones fit in our ears too.

When I was researching this post I found this fascinating blog, Paleofuture.com, in which they show visions of future technology from the past. (I love those “kitchens of the future” segments from the 40s and 50s!) Even in the 1970s they thought portable telephones would be huge.

hearingaid

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

46 Responses to “Is there a person on a cell phone in a 1928 Charlie Chaplin film?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Eileen says:

    Haha! I watched that future kitchens video. They forgot to take into account that now woman say to men “What’s for dinner beyatch!” lol

  2. K says:

    He is a cutie!

  3. Eileen says:

    Oh my gosh did you watch the Clothing of the year 2,ooo? I loved the shoes on the lady wearing pants-they are pretty close to our styles and then it shows a lady with a big bulb in her hair “as a beacon to find an honest man!” LOL love it!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9eAiy0IGBI&feature=related

  4. jc126 says:

    Thanks to moviesunrated for solving the mystery! I didn’t think she was a time traveler, but was flummoxed by this, and am glad that apparently it’s not some d-bag doing a Photoshop type thing.

  5. Rita says:

    Isn’t it amazing how connected our world is. Within minutes, someone somewhere can respond with information that was thought to have been forgotten decades ago. However, I think the “hearing aide” information is from the “time traveler” trying to cover his tracks. Why would someone be talking into a hearing aide?

  6. Kaboom says:

    Even if a time traveller came to 1928 with a cell phone – who would he talk to, without a mobile network?

  7. Meow Mix says:

    Stupid question but why is she talking into a hearing aid?

  8. Celebitchy says:

    Eileen that is awesome thanks for sharing. The shoes were dead on! As was that outfit with the changing color panel. That looks just like that terrible dress that Julianne Moore just wore!

  9. Mrs. Dacry says:

    But if it’s a hearing aid, who is she talking to by herself?

  10. Rita says:

    @Eileen and Celebitchy

    For crying out loud ladies. We have just discovered the first evidence of a time traveler that can connect to his mobile service through the dimensions of time and space and you are all excited about fashion????? Well, the shoes are fab….never mind.

  11. brin says:

    @Mrs. Dacry…..well, every generation has one of those!

  12. Jess says:

    I have to agree with Rita. Why would they be talking into a hearing aid? I was convinced after reading the article that it was a hearing aid but after watching it doesnt make sense. It doesnt even look like maybe they are talking to someone off camera.

  13. a1 says:

    unless it is an Iphone, I don’t care!

  14. a1 says:

    about Clothing Of The Future, you know from where Gaga got inspiration!

  15. sickofit says:

    she has just visited the dentist and its a piece of ice she holding on to her cheek

  16. jc126 says:

    LOTS of people talk to themselves. Actually everyone does, just not always out loud like this lady.

  17. In the film, the lady appears to be talking and smiling :Who is she talking to? Someone off camera? And if this a cell phone, why does no-one else on the street seem to notice?

  18. RHONYC says:

    i’m a sucker for irish accents. 🙂

  19. jen says:

    Can you hear me then?

  20. Ferguson. says:

    It really looks like she’s talking to someone. Weird, huh? Maybe she’s just talking to herself and that’s it.

  21. sashavice says:

    Oh my god, this is freaking me out for some reason. I find this really creepy.

  22. Jazz says:

    That hearing aid looks like an ipod! I remember when I was a kid, going to a science museum where they had video phones with a tiny grainy black and white picture and I thought it was the most fascinating futuristic thing I had ever seen. How times change!

  23. Missfit says:

    VERY interesting…well, you never know, anything is possible, it can be a time traveler. 😉 Maybe it could be one from a time where you can talk on the cell without a network, someone further into the future than what we are living in now. Technology is always coming up with new inventions constantly and there is brilliant people out there to be able to do so.

  24. Celebitchy says:

    LMAO at Jen!! Good one!

  25. Ummmm.... says:

    Did he take a cell phone tower with him too? Geez.

  26. truthSF says:

    jen:

    Can you hear me then?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    You just know it was Verizon. Their competition with AT&T has gotten so fierce, they even went back in time to recruit more customers.

  27. 4REAL says:

    Oh come on she’s talking to the MAN IN FRONT OF HER and could be holding her checkbook/wallet for all we know!

  28. Mairead says:

    The man is either a blithering idiot (and an ageist gobshite while I’m at it) or has hit on a nice wheeze to promote his terrible (terrible) films.

    With anything like this the question is never what you’re shown, it’s what you’re not shown. The guy in the suit is shown walking out of shot, but there’s no way of determining if he stopped just outside the frame. Also, as my partner just pointed out – where is she getting reception on her “phone”?

    My take – it’s black and white with a very high contrast. I think the poor old woman is with the man in the suit and they’re walking to the theatre entrance. The person she’s talking to is the man in the suit. She’s hiding her face and “the black plastic” case is a shadow. Notice at the very very end of the clip she loosens the grip and you can see it’s a shadow on the side of her face.

    Or perhaps she is wearing a hearing aid and is cupping her ear to hear it better?

    OR she’s this eejit’s great-granny and she was a mentaller like him 🙄

    And as for “interesting and cute”. Kaiser, honey, no. Just, no!

  29. Mairead says:

    TruthSF for the mo’fo’in’ win!!! 😆

  30. truthSF says:

    Aww, thanks Mairhead. 🙂

  31. Paris Troika says:

    With the introduction of sound in films, there was a lot of trouble getting things ‘right’ from more than just a technical standpoint. Before sound, there was no need for the “quiet on the set!” before the cameras started rolling, so it’s not at all unusual that an extra would have been yammering away at a conversational tone as they walked across the set. As far as I can tell, it’s a case of someone talking and scratching their face.
    You can see evidence of this rocky transition from silent film in the first few years of ‘talkies’ – most silent actors couldn’t make the transition because their line delivery was stilted and terrible, and their acting style was more suited to vaudeville stage.

  32. Jenna says:

    she was talking into it to adjust the levels of the volume.

  33. Jenna says:

    also back then, tooth aches were a big problem. they would put ice into fabric and hold it to their cheeks. maybe that’s what she’s doing!

  34. Mairead says:

    That’s a good perspective Paris Troika (LOVE the name!)

    @Truth. No probs (it is Mairead btw, no ‘h’)

  35. fizXgirl314 says:

    omg really? Time traveller? That’s the first thing that comes to mind without even an attempt to come up with a more reasonable and logical solution? I hate morons like that!!!

  36. Javagirl1 says:

    So glad you covered this CB, its trippy no matter what it is!

  37. truthSF says:

    Oops Mairead, that was honestly a typo!

  38. Kim says:

    This guy has WAYYYYYY to much time on his hands.

  39. richierich says:

    This is interesting. I totally believe there might be others. I think we are pretty arrogant to say we are the only ones!

  40. insidescoop says:

    neat post, i like it

  41. Zvonk says:

    If technology were developed enough to allow time travel, it would be safe to assume that a means of communication with the traveller’s original time frame would also be possible. Having said that, I think it would also be safe to assume that a communication device would adapted to be less conspicuous.

    As intriguing as the idea is, my theory is that it is indeed a hearing aid, and the manly woman in question is talking and smiling because she can finally hear herself.

  42. Shy says:

    Oh, we all know it’s Doctor Who 🙂

    And he was talking to his girl in the Tardis 🙂

  43. Alicia says:

    Ok you got me, that was actually me, I like to travel to the past In a fat suit and ugly shoes then I hold my I phone to my ear and talk in front of camaras so shittie film makers can promote their websites

  44. Alicia says:

    Now kidding aside, I don’t think that is a hearing aid, why would she be talking into it? The other thing is that if you are a time traveller and you lived at a time when they had traveling machines, iam sure this devices won’t be needing regular cell connections like we use now.
    I don’t know what to make from this footage, but I want to believe that it is indeed a time traveller cause is more fun that a regular explanation

  45. LaFashionista says:

    All reading this post should google Nikola Tesla and you will find out that your modern gadgets are not that mordern after all. As far as technology goes, we are a thousand years behind if not more. There is a crap load of technological information which has been hidden from us. Just look around you the houses, the cars, and the fashions not to mention the lifestyle is little changed from the early 50’s. Those who are unware of their past are bound to repeat it.