Dr. Drew wonders if Angelina Jolie is still on drugs, calls her charity “self-serving”


TV psychiatrist Dr. Drew Pinsky had the Scientologists calling him a Nazi after he said in a recent interview that Cruise’s involvement in the cult looks like “a function of a very deep emptiness and suggests serious neglect in childhood – maybe some abuse, but mostly neglect.โ€ Pinsky half-heartedly apologized in a bland statement afterward, with his rep saying “Dr. Drew meant no harm to Mr. Cruise and apologizes if his comments were hurtful.” You can’t blame the guy for not being more contrite after Cruise’s lawyer compared him to infamous Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.

Cruise wasn’t the only celebrity Dr. Drew dissed in that interview in Playboy. He made a really sweeping statement about Angelina Jolie’s admission of past drug use, saying no one ever gets past using heroin and that he questions whether she’s still sober. He also called her charity work “self-serving.”

“I’m concerned with what’s really going on with Angelina Jolie,” he said in July’s issue of Playboy. “I’ve never seen someone remit heroin completely. You’re either still on heroin, Oxycontin or something else. Unless you’re dead. Is she still using something? Is she in recovery. If she’s in recovery, I don’t see any evidence of it, because people in recovery invest themselves in simple, selfless acts of service, not global self-serving acts.”

[From In Touch, print edition, June 30, 2008]

So, according to Dr. Drew there are no former heroin users who lead normal lives without attending meetings. Maybe he only sees the hard cases, but that seems like a pretty broad generalization.

Today is World Refugee Day and Angelina recorded a video to bring attention to the plight of displaced people throughout the world. Except somehow it’s all about her, since she admits to doing heroin in her past and no one who’s ever done heroin at any point can go on to lead a normal life without staying in recovery for the rest of their life, right Dr. Drew?

I don’t know how old these photos of Angelina are since they were undated, but she looks like she’s on something here. Thanks to PRPhotos.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

123 Responses to “Dr. Drew wonders if Angelina Jolie is still on drugs, calls her charity “self-serving””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Enonymouse says:

    I am SO tired of hearing about Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt but from what Dr. Drew is saying, as long she is not hurting anyone and herself and she is actually doing good then good for her, more power to her. Unlike Tom Cruise and his crazy Scientology cult.

  2. jay says:

    hello plastic surgery. she looks totally different.

  3. Codzilla says:

    Can’t wait to read the comments about this one.

  4. WTF says:

    Dr. Drew is my new god. Someone who is not afraid to call a spade a spade, even the most photographed “pretty” people on the planet.
    Oh, yeah, and HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
    ๐Ÿ˜†

  5. Jody says:

    My husband had a bout with the H bomb, long before he and I met– I have yet to ever see an intense opiate like Heroin or Oxy in my house.

    I’m surprised that a person who is a student of psychology, would make such a generalized statement. One could easily say that Angie simply chooses to save those “simple selfless acts” for her daily life with her children and partner– acts that people without a telephoto lens cannot see.

    p.s. she looks insanely strung out in that bottom photo

  6. Keith Orchard says:

    Wow, i would have great pause going to an addiction specialist that freely admits, not himself, or god, or anyone in the universe can break a herion addiction. So, by that logic, people who pay him for help are being conned and he is a fraud. God help us if we end up making a stupid error in judgement as kids and try drugs. Now that I know I can never recover, i’m expecting a relapse anytime now.

  7. Scott F. says:

    Wow, at first I thought that was an old picture of Ashley Judd. It’s weird how much they used to look alike.

    Not really defending him, but from a clinical/medical standpoint he is right. Once a body suffers an addiction (especially something as hard has heroin), it will ALWAYS crave it to some extent. That’s why addicts are asked to understand that recovery is a lifelong process. There most likely will be relapses, because your body still thinks it needs it. It’s not like this is just about heroin either – ask anyone who’s ever quit smoking if the cravings ever REALLY go away. My uncle quit 30 years ago and he still admits he wants one after every meal.

    I don’t really think it’s about him ‘only seeing the hard cases’, so much as it’s that there are no other kind of cases when it comes to heroin. It’s a lot like meth, you’re either on it or you’re not. I’ve never seen a ‘casual user’ of heroin, crack, meth ect. It’s not like a pothead who can still function pretty well most of the time.

    As far as the charity goes, I do think her and Brad like feeling like the reincarnation of Mother Theresa, but at the end of the day I doubt the refugees who now have food or medical supplies really care what the motivation behind it was.

  8. Greg says:

    I heard that Dr. Drew himself has been fighting a crack addiction himself..good luck to him.

  9. Rihab says:

    Shame, shame, Dr. Drew. I’m a recovered drug addict, of which included Oxy, Vicodin and heroin, and I have been completely sober for two years now.

    I admire that Angie can be clean about her issues, and still be as giving and loving as she seems.

  10. anon says:

    It never ceases to amaze me when people insist she’s never had cosmetic surgery. She looks nothing like this now. And it’s not just the hair. And these photos were after she had already had some work done b/c when she’s younger she looks like an entirely different person.

    I am about the same age and she is and while I have changed the entire shape of my face and features are the same. No one changes that much with out surgery.

    And bottom photo, those are some crazy strung out eyes.

  11. Mairead says:

    Fair play to you Rihab – keep up the good work ๐Ÿ˜€

    Um, maybe I’m wrong but I thought that it was psychiatrists who dealt with the business-end of the chemical addition not psychologists?

    There is anecdotal evidence, that there is a significant number of people users, who are (temporarily) smoking heroin generally in the evening and still functioning in their jobs during the day.

    Nobody goes to strung-out junkie overnight. And it appears that this Dr. Drew fella has no more awareness of any maintenance programme (if any) that she has, so he’s giving an opinion, but not a very well-informed one.

    It never ceases to amaze me why people care whether she’s had surgery or not. Nearly everybody has had something done in Hollywood – and it’s getting more and more common everywhere else too. If she has had surgery then it was pretty good, end of story.

  12. Shannon says:

    I think he is right, but I disagree with him that her charity is NOT self-serving. Yes, she does do it globally, but she’s Angelina Jolie. What is she going to do? She can’t just go to her local Red Cross and volunteer, so what she is doing is more on her level as a superstar A-list actress.

    I have known people who have used hard substances like heroin and crack, and again I agree with Dr. Drew. You don’t really kick it and you have to be very cognizant about who you hang around with, and what those people do. That is probably why she surrounds herself with children because they come drug-free…most times.

  13. Lizabeth says:

    I’ve actually wondered the same things myself, Dr. Drew. Angelina seems to be all about Angelina and some of the things she’s done, while no one could argue that they have brought attention and funds to deserving causes, could also be viewed as recreating her image.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that she doesn’t have some altruistic motives, I’m just thinking that it’s a bit more complex than just being a do gooder.

    And addiction is a complicated beast. I’m glad that those commenters who have battled addiction and beaten it have had success but that is not the norm. For most addicts, it’s a lifelong process. Drugs are your physiologic and psychologic crutch. Being in the public eye in general is kind of counter productive to achieving a sense of self worth and harmony.

    No one else seems willing to suggest that Santa Angelina is anything other than the hottest earth mother ever. It’s her image and she’s worked hard to cultivate it. I’m not saying that people can’t change, just that it’s difficult.

  14. anon says:

    I don’t care whether or not she, or anyone else, has had cosmetic surgery. In many ways it is a part of the job and practically required.

    What I am bothered about is the lying. Her saying she would never have cosmetic surgery and never has. I don’t think she, or anyone else, needs to say yes they have or makes a list of what they’ve had done but just don’t comment.

    Angelina, Nicole Kidman, Halle Berry and others who have clearly had work done and then talk about how they are totally natural are what bother me. Just don’t comment. And yet all of them have condemned it. It’s the hypocrisy that I hate. I don’t condem them for surgery but for lying.

  15. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    Re: Plastic surgery, and a pic of Angie maybe circa 1998, versus how she looks now. I think it’s just different hair color and cut, make-up and drug usage (yes, she’s obviously on… something, God knows what). Plus pregnancy, which does change women’s faces.

    Re: Dr. Drew… I read the whole Playboy interview, and I was filled with complete loathing for the man. It’s not just about La Jolie, he makes really broad generalizations about nearly every psychiatriac condition out there. It was like “I met a cokehead once. I think all cokeheads are the same, based on that one experience.”

    And the whole professionally diagnosing someone based on what you read about them in Star? Utter bullshit.

  16. anon says:

    I dabbled in heroin “recreationally” on and off for a year of my life. That was 10 years ago and had a couple days of withdrawal symptoms, but got through it just fine. I don’t do any other drugs, I don’t smoke–I drink about 1 drink a week and that isn’t every week. It IS possible for people to get off heroin and not get addicted, although it is rare and you really never hear about it. She seems to be a very strong woman and those types of personalities may be better suited for not continuing with some type of addiction. I love Dr. Drew but he is generalizing on this. ๐Ÿ™

  17. monica says:

    you don’t know that how he feels is based on what he has read or what he does know. we odn’t know any of these people on a personal level. we don’t know that he has or has not met angelina or tom.
    he is a top doctor of addiction. he not only has a tv show and columns but he also teaches a celebrated university.
    he deals with addictions and is considered an expert in his field.
    would you all be upset if he said this about someone else, rather than angelina jolie? i dont think that you would be. when celebitchy decided to post about what he said about tom cruise, the majority of you jumped on the bandwagon to say what very negative things about tom and scientology and how right dr drew was but now he’s a know nothing.
    i very well could see that angelina has an addiction problem. it wasn’t that long ago that there were reports that she was doing drugs with her friend marilyn manson. he even created an art piece showing her using a “nail” to inject into her arm.
    at the very least, i could see relapse but that she now fine.
    i personally believe she is bi-polar
    (and i have experience with this personally, which could also attribute to her choice in lifestyle.

  18. lola says:

    When Dr Drew was saying nasty things about Tom Cruise, the Brangeloonies thought he was very clever, now he turns to their saint ๐Ÿ˜† Lets see whether they will still think him clever.

    What goes around comes around, do not create a monster to eat your enemy, it will still be hungry when your enemy is no more!

    I have always wondered how Angelina came from such a storng addiction to sobber philathropist over night. She is a psycho no doubt, when all the Brangelina novelty wears off, we will see that psycho coming out more and more.

    Dr Drew plagarised my point I stress here EVERYDAY!, all that charity is self serving, not rocket science really. ๐Ÿ™„

  19. Lizabeth says:

    Agreed Monica.

    Let’s take a look at what we KNOW about Angelina:

    1. Her drug use is well documented.
    2. She entered into a relationship with a married man.
    3. Her appearance has changed significantly over the years, despite her insistance that she’s never had surgery.
    4. She has used her celebrity to draw attention to international humanitarian causes.

    So, there’s some good there, but there’s also some bad and I think Dr. Drew makes some good points. He could also be wrong. So what nerve has he touched? Is it that he said these things about someone he’s not treating or that he said them about Angelina Jolie?

  20. Mairead says:

    Monica – there are a good number of other commentators who agree with him you realise.

    Personally, I’ve not said he knows nothing, just that I’m not sure it’s so black-and-white in many cases. Plus, we don’t know what her rehab strategy is.

    Not to be picky, but the reports with Marilyn Manson were blind items, that some people assumed was Angelina because she’s one of few actresses to say that she’s used heroin.

  21. Vince says:

    Its one thing to do charity work. Its self serving the moment you drag the paps.

    “HEY LOOK AT HOW NICE AND SELFLESS I AM!!!! SUPPORT MY MOVIES BUY MY STUFF

  22. The words Tom Cruise and Cult still don’t mix well in my thought process. Angelina for sure does not look sober in those pictures…

  23. lola says:

    Thats my point Vince, when they have a movie coming out, suddenly they announce a donation to New Orleans. After their infidelity, their iamges were going to the sewers if they had not taken up charity. I am not sure charity has helped since Angelina is always high on lists of most hated woman. But lets face it, their charity is about their image not the goodness of their hearts. I don’t doubt they love their kids, but their biggest motivation is their image/PR, period.

  24. dana says:

    sorry, but i cant take anything someone who now makes his fortune off of RATINGS has to say. had he sat down with angelina and come to this conclusion i would be more willing to accept it, but he gets his info on her from the same place i do! and besides, CHARITY IS CAHRITY! as long as people are being helped, who cares what the motivation behind it is?

  25. Scott F. says:

    To everyone saying it’s possible to do heroin and not get addicted – I know that’s true, but is that really the responsible message people should be putting out there?

    “Hey, I did heroin and I’m just fine now!”

    Most people who do it aren’t fine, in fact it destroys their lives. When you make comments like that you’re telling people that there is a possibility they won’t get hooked – but do you really understand how vanishingly small a percentage we’re talking about here?

    Like 2% of the population has no reaction to arsenic too, does that mean we should start injecting it?

  26. Hollz says:

    Monica, the shift button exists for a reason. Please use it.

    If you look at a picture of me from a year ago, you wouldn’t believe it’s me- peoples looks can change, drastically without surgery- and hers haven’t. She still has the same nose, eyes, lips, chin, and cheekbones…i went to a January 15th picture (the one about violent video games) for a non obvious pregnant comparison..and while she looks different, the structure of her face remains the same.

    Charity is still Charity- I know I only did some (not all) of the charity work I’ve done to pack my resume…

    About the heroin, don’t know, don’t care- it’s not like she’s laying about doing it all day or being stoned in public…

  27. fee says:

    I “experimented” with pot, LSD, speed & heroin as a teen and in my early 20s. I never became “addicted” and have always held jobs & have now had a beautiful family. Unfortunately some of my old friends where not so lucky and developed in junkies and have never got off the stuff. Not all drug use goes on to become full blown addictions – im in no way condoning drug use but the fact is that not all drug user have to attend support groups and rehab to get over it. If she was anything like me she just grew up and stopped using it as a pointless way to rebel.

  28. monica says:

    well said f. scott.
    for most people, 6 hours after the drug lives your system your body starts to crave it again. it’s our chemical makeup.
    there are tons of people who are addicts but they do go thru the normal motions of life. i know teachers, engineers, and stockbrockers who do coke everyday but don’t look like junkies. there seems to be an underlying feeling here that dr drew insulted angelina by insinuating that she has an addiction and people are upset but the truth of the matter is even the nicest person in the room could have an addictions but it doesn’t make them a bad person. it makes them a person who has an addiction.
    i don’t think it’s fair to say that he does this for ratings if it can not also be said that angelina’s acts are not without some sense of self-exposure. charity may be charity and although it does help people, it should also be said that she could help (like so many stars and people do) without making it a circus. i know it’s to raise awareness but come on people…can you admit that you have coontributed because angelina did.
    the fact that you become aware of issues around the world because of a celebrity does not bode well.
    (personal note: this is my writing style. no shifts. thanx.)

  29. KDRockstar says:

    I am no Brangie fan, but Dr. Drew is half-cocked here.

    She has never shown any act that could be construed as drug-induced or based.

    But. (Didn’t you know there’d have to be a but?)

    But she continues to get “high” off of guns and flying and danger. In fact, I see her puke-inducing Mother Angelina act more of a way to get “high” off of goodness.

    So Drew is half right, but, man, he’s got to STFU right now or he’ll piss off a lot of people.

  30. Ginny says:

    My opinion on the whole charity thing is that it doesn’t really matter whether she’s doing it for herself, or genuinely doing it because she cares. The result is the same in the end. It’s getting done, it’s getting attention, and millions of dollars are going to good causes. Does it matter if she does it to clean up her image or if she does it because she honestly wants to help? Not really, the end result is the same.

  31. Granger says:

    Sorry, but I have trouble believing anything that comes out of the mouth of a reality show host — educational credentials or not.

  32. vdantev says:

    Dr. Drew needs to shut his attention sucking pie-hole, already.

    To the usual bunch of Angelina haters- ‘Your shit stinks too, your lives aren’t perfect, lots of people start charities because they feel guilty about something like their incredibly privileged lifestyle, your jealousy is palpable and SHE DOESN’T NEED YOUR PERMISSION.’

    That last bit is what really irks the lot of you.

  33. Alison says:

    I’ve never been a heroin addict, but I know that with addictions, people who stop something, usually need to start another addiction to take it’s place….sex, tattoos, men, attention…in Angelina’s case, it’s a shit-load of kids, sex, tattoos, working yourself (literally) to the bone, isolation from the general public, attention and serving the world. I personally think she gets off on it in a way that she thinks she’s better then everyone else. She’s always put on that air. Apparently, she has no real girlfriends (as in friends who are girls) and never has. She is reportedly NOT nice to the ‘normal folk’. I think it’s great that ANYONE with money tries to help make the world a better place, but I COULD see a self-serving aspect to it (in her).

  34. velvet elvis says:

    It’s pretty clear to me that she’s now addicted to children. Especially exotic orphans. I mean, who else goes on vacation and brings back a kid as a souvenir? Someone addicted, that’s who.

  35. amy says:

    I encourage everyone to read the ENTIRE interview, I found it actually very interesting. That one little blip about Anjelina was all he said about her throughout the whole thing. He talks about celebrity addiction in general and also gives his thoughts on individuals like Tom Cruise, Paris Hilton, Brittany Spears and Mel Gibson. And before everyone rips him a new one, Ive yet to see any quotes of were he actually PRAISES Craig Ferguson, Robert Downey Jr and yes, even Lohan for being serious about their sobriety and the paths they’ve taken to recovery. Read the whole thing, its worth it.

  36. sassyspank says:

    rainy, rainy – go away… don’t come back another day – this isn’t a space for you to advertise your URL!!

    In regards to Dr.Drew – I have to say that he’s purposefully being controversial here… he saw where his last comments got him (a bit of publicity) so now he’s craving some more… perhaps it is him who has fallen victim? Now, “addicted to fame”?

    Yes, Angelina has fully admitted to being on dope before – but she obviously wasn’t a raging addict. If she had become one, she would have had the track marks to prove it, paired with Amy Weinhouse behavior giving her away, paired with an appearance on the People’s Court. I think she went through her 20s experimenting, and is off of whatever she was on then.

    It is obvious to her and Brad that their work gains publicity – but i really don’t care if this is the driving puropse! I work for an NGO and I can tell you that the biggest challenge in everything we do is getting funding. If they wanted to give our org enough money to ensure our sustenance for the next 5 years then disappeared I’d be happy as a clam! Who ELSE is doing this type of work? Paris Hilton? Thinks she gives a dime away to charity?

    So, I really don’t give a sh*t what the huge motivation behind her giving funds to those that need it. Point it: she’s doing it, and whether some of you on here care or not: it IS making a difference in improving some people’s lives. If you’ve never bothered to give even close to 5 dollars to an organization trying to do important work, then you ‘ve just lost the privilege from talking from your soap box.

  37. someone says:

    It is nice to know that someone else who is well known thinks angelina sucks.

  38. journey says:

    7

  39. Jayde says:

    I think he’s absolutely correct. I’m a Counseling Psychologist, but addiction is not my specialty. However, I was on heroin (and cocaine and meth and anything else I could get my hands on) & there is NO WAY to recover without some kind of treatment. She’s probably just embellished her “addiction” stories to seem like more of a badass than she actually is.

    She makes me want to barf.

  40. Kimmy says:

    Yeah, I think Angelina Jolie is a far better human being than Tom Cruise, because Tom Cruise is an evil loser with an evil, dangerous cult, $cientology.

    But…

    I agree with Dr. Drew. Not on the heroin issue, my half-sister recovered from a heroin addiction and I believe it’s possible to get clean and live a decent lifestyle after using heroin, I’m not going to judge Angelina for that. I’ve never touched any hard drugs, and I never will. But I do smoke cigarettes and pot. I sometimes take shrooms, acid and E. Those are my vices. I’m not judging Angelina about her previous heroin use.

    What I do agree about with Dr. Drew (in addition to my belief that Tom Cruise is f-ed up) is that Angelina’s ‘philanthropy’ is self-serving. I just don’t like her. I’m not a Jennifer Aniston fan, and I think the nastiest people in Hollywood are the $cientologists, Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, John Travolta, Jenna Elfman, Kirstie Alley, Will Smith, Issac Hayes, Nancy Cartwright. But… I really don’t like Angelina Jolie. Ugh…

  41. SR says:

    I agree with the doctor. She could have donated millions without giving interviews about how much she gives.

    Onceshe has the need to publicized her “giving” it is a PR move, rather than actually doing something quietly for others.

    She could have volunteered and do all these things just for the sake of helping, but she always makes sure that she is being photographed (with makeup and hair stylists).

    Even her treatment of children seems more like an addiction and self serving than actually caring for the children and making sure they are raised in a stable home.

    I remember she adopted that child she renamed “Pax” and he was so frightened and didn’t evem know her or understood a word in English.
    She took him, whithout visiting him properly before, and had People magazine staff take his picture in a hotel and set up an interview to talk about how she has adopted him.

    Those are acts that place her ego and image before the well-being of the child.

    Same goes for the jet-setting and constant travel that seems as another symptom of her addictions and instability.

  42. angry me says:

    No legitimate ethical physician makes a diagnosis without a through examination and appropriate tests and they only do this with THEIR patients. In the US HIPPA laws preclude the release of a patient’s private health information. This Dr. Drew, who states he has never even met Ms. Jolie, knows nothing about what she may or may not have done except for gossip/hearsay, is a complete fake like Dr. Phil. As a medical professional I am greatly dismayed and upset and hope that this Dr. Drew like Dr. Phil is brought up before his governing Medical Board.

  43. Because I say So says:

    I haven’t read the article, so I can’t say as to the entire interview, but personally, I think it is in very bad taste for Dr. Drew to comment publicly on ANYONE that he has not treated. That’s Phil McGraw territory. Dr. Drew is actually highly respected, regardless of his ratings/tv show, so I think it shows very poor taste to talk about Brangelina or that wacko Cruise. He should just stick to generalities, period.

  44. Because I say So says:

    To Angry Me: As a licensed, practicing psychologist, Dr. Drew hasn’t violated any ethics codes. It would be a different matter if she were his patient and he went on record with his inside knowledge. It’s speculation, which, while not advisable, is not an ethical violation. For all I know he could be threatened with a lawsuit, but as far as the APA goes, he’s in the clear.

    And also for the record, “Dr” Phil had his license suspended in TX and has never reapplied in any other state. I believe it was due to sexual misconduct…big surprise….

  45. Leandra says:

    Dr. Drew appears to be craving publicity. He is losing his credibility and respect people had for him with his asinine comments.

  46. jonnypop says:

    Wow. I can’t believe you people. You’re all bagging on Angie because she uses her fame for her benefit, but none of you see anything wrong with this famewhore crackpot doc who craves his 5 mins of fame more than a crack addict? What are his attacks on Tom and Angie? Nothing but self-serving, craven famewhoring. He named names for only one reason: To get his ugly, pathetic face on news and get his name talked about. He is no different than Perez Hilton, a pathetic goon who leeches off people’s misery or other people’s fame.

    Don’t tell me his show benefits people. Bull. Shows are inherently exploitive, feeding off the misery of people so that the audience can feel better about themselves and he can fatten his checkbook. His bottom-feeding, Jerry Springer-wannabe butt should jump off the Brooklyn bridge and better the world.

  47. mazy says:

    This is the age we live in, anyone can say anything at all about someone they do not personally know, and some will believe what is said no matter what it is. Angelina has stated that she does not do drugs now but has been honest that she experimented 11+ years ago. At no time has she said she was an addict, at no time has she ever not been able to work like Robert Downey, Jr., or been rushed to hospital for medical treatment or rehab or jailed. There is no proof whatsoever to backup this socalled Dr’s assertions. You who are so quick to believe should ask yourself what kind of Dr. proclaims something about a person’s health without ever having treated that person, without any contact at all, in Playboy. The ones with problems are Dr.Drew and any of you who so quickly seize upon his words as the gospel truth. Ask yourselves how this Dr can diagnose anything out of the thin air because that is what Dr. Drew did to get paid by Playboy, they wanted trash and he made up lies, and those who believe trash become trash.

  48. CAA says:

    The good “doctor” is being an ass now. Until THIS I was giving him the benefit of a VH1 doubt but this is the corker. I quit smoking cigarettes which has been compared to being MORE DIFFICULT than quitting heroin and I’m not doing anything to be self serving (whatever THAT is all about) or using any “substitutes” to stay nicotine free. In addition to that I quit drinking 31 years ago too…….I wonder what Pinsky would have to say about THAT?

  49. Carena says:

    I don’t think Dr. Drew is 100% correct based on my personal experiences….I’d say probably 97% which is close enough.

    I did a lot of drugs when I was younger and thankfully was able to quit when I decided it was no longer what I wanted. I’m not saying it was easy but I knew I had to do it so I just did. That was over 10 years ago and I haven’t looked back. Unfortunately some of the people I did drugs with are hardcore addicts to this day.

    Like a lot of past drug users, I seemed to have “replaced” the drugs with other activities. I have a mild form of OCD that seems to strike me when I’m stressed. I guess my brain just has to obsess about something. Maybe Angelina replaced her drug addiction with family addiction.

  50. mig says:

    jeg er behandler og det er rigtigt at misbruger har en tendens til at skifte et misbrug ud med et andet og det er det hun gรธr hun gรธr alt til det ekstreme hendes sex afhรฆnighed med begge kรธn hendes selviskhed mig mig syndrom anskaffelse af bรธrn hendes altid opmรฆrksomheds sรธgen vil gรธre alt for at vรฆre pรฅ en dag vil hendes adfรฆrd fรฅ store koncekvenser for hendes nรฆrmeste desvรฆrre

  51. geronimo says:

    @ Lola, you’re so full of shit.

    I was one of the few people genuinely apalled at Drew’s comments on Tom Cruise – here’s one of my comments from that thread:

    “Suggesting publicly that Cruise is the product of a neglected, troubled, abusive childhood is very questionable, even if true. It seems highly provocative and unprofessional from someone who makes his living dealing with the mental health well-being of others…..Itโ€™s the docโ€™s professional reputation thatโ€™s at stake here and I think heโ€™s made a serious error of judgement.”

    And here he is again, showing himself to be even more of a whore-mongering charlatan than he already showed himself to be with his comments on Cruise. Not one ounce of credibility left and for exactly ths same reasons as with Cruise: a professional, credible psychiatrist would never make such ill-advised, ignorant, blanket diagnoses publicly about people he has never met.

  52. Liam says:

    I find his commentary puzzling, if nothing else.
    He makes the point that a heroin addict, once they stop using, can never again live life without, eventually, returning to heroin/opiate use. He seems to believe, based on his statements relating to this specific case and from what I’ve heard on ‘Loveline’, that the exception to this is that if she is involved in ongoing ‘recovery’. So a physiological addiction to an opiate can only be arrested by attending recovery meetings, working The Twelve Steps and going through the specific program requirements of AA? So only the thought changes that occur by involvement in AA can never be achieved in any other way for an addict? This is typical AA rhetorical that makes it feel like such an ****ing cult. And he accuses Cruise’s involvement in Scientology as problematic, but AA is benign? Dr. Drew, sickeningly, waves the AA flag and pushes it on anyone who ever calls into his stupid ****ing show and admits to using drugs or alcohol. Believe me, I’ve been in AA and it is ****ing whack. For an M.D. to promote only a spiritual cult as a solution to a physiological condition is ridiculous. Do people overcome addictions, including opiate addictions, without AA ‘recovery’. Of course they do. What’s wrong with this guy?

  53. Liam says:

    I find his commentary puzzling, if nothing else. He makes the point that a heroin addict, once they stop using, can never again live life without, eventually, returning to heroin/opiate use. He seems to believe, based on his statements relating to this specific case and from what Iโ€™ve heard on โ€™Lovelineโ€™, that the exception to this is involvement in ongoing โ€™recoveryโ€™, namely AA. So a physiological addiction to an opiate can only be arrested by attending recovery meetings, working The Twelve Steps and going through the specific program requirements of AA? He seems to always be pushing this point: that the ‘thought changes’ made in AA, which ‘remove’ physiological and psychological addiction, can never be achieved in any other way for an addict. This is the typical AA rhetoric that makes it feel like such an fucking cult. Yet he accuses Cruiseโ€™s involvement in Scientology as problematic and AA as totally benign. Dr. Drew, consistently and sickeningly, waves the AA flag and pushes it on anyone who ever calls into his stupid fucking show admitting to using drugs or alcohol. Believe me, Iโ€™ve been in AA and it’s ridiculous. For an M.D. to promote a spiritual cult as the only solution to a physiological condition is antiquated. Do people overcome addictions, including opiate addictions, without AA โ€™recoveryโ€™? Of course they do. I know dozens of ex-heroin addicts who haven’t used in years and don’t crave it, yet I seriously doubt that they are involved in consistent ‘selfless service’. This AA issue is so fucking deep, I don’t even know where to begin, but, at least, people are finally onto it. Whatโ€™s wrong with this guy?

    P.S. Co-host Stryker from ‘Loveline’- run for your life!

  54. Alexis says:

    Then Dr. Drew is certainly not fighting any sort of an addiction because he is completely self serving.

  55. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    Another thing that really struck me about the Dr. Drew quote is the sideways implication that she was/is still using drugs throughout two pregnancies. Surely that’s a breach of medical ethics, or at least ‘libel’ in a civil case.

  56. geronimo says:

    Meant to say *media whore-mongering charlatan earlier.

    Totally agree, kaiser/hipp. The implications are libellous.

  57. lola says:

    Geronimo,

    when I wrote my comment, I didn’t know that you had become a full fledged Brangeloonie. Go back to that thread and read the comments from the resident Brangeloonies showering praises on the good old doctor for his qualifications and insight. Now they have changed their minds because he is in on them. I don’t remember mentioning you specifically.

    I am not diagnosing Angelina with any addiction, I often wondered how she beat an addiction like that, remember she had been using heroin for years. My take is that she substituted it with marriage wrecking, collecting kids and obsessive charity.

    Dr Drew is just repeating what I have always said, Angelina’s charity is self serving and so far, what has changed in Iraq since she went there? Namibia? Vietnam? Nothing, yet credit has been given to her and she has itched closer to sainthood. The biggest benefactor of her do gooding is : Angelina Jolie. Three years ago she was just another actress, now she is a global phenomenon that she wanted to be, commanding a huge salary because of the additional fame, with all the attention she craved (re- vials of blood, kissing brother) but had eluded her.

    It does not take a genius to work out that she does not hold even a single kind bone in her skinny veined body. No kind person treats a fellow human being like she did Aniston.

    Good for those who have gained from her self serving acts, the kids especially, but we will see the future she gives them before we canonise her.

  58. mollination says:

    I really hope his comments were taken out of context because I really like Dr. Drew, and all of the sudden he’s been putting his foot in his mouth a lot. Stop it! You’re so much better than a Dr. Phil, so don’t start acting like one!

  59. Trashaddict says:

    Hmm, let’s talk about “self-serving”. What is the motivation of a psychologist who chooses to get his message out in PLAYBOY, of all places? Yeah guys, I know, it’s got good articles…..

  60. bros says:

    his comments on cruise are ridiculous and speculatory psycho-babble and since he is a specialist in addiction I would rather he not fish around for motivational reasons for cruise’s involvement in that church. who knows what the reason is and who cares. dr. drew solves nothing by offering his opinion on why someone chooses a particular religion/cult. does he have ideas for every single person who is a scientologist? is every single one of them suffering from neglect in their childhood and abuse? most likely not. his divining and speculations piss me off and he should know, as a doctor, to not diagnose before meeting the “patient.”

    on jolie, his comments are indeed verging on the libelous. what about nicole richie who was doing heroin? is she in treatment? did she do drugs throughout her pregnancy and now into motherhood? so so so many people in hollywood and everywhere else have dabbled and experimented with drugs and dont make life long habits of it. jolie never said she was a full-blown heroin addict. she used it recreationally as so many people use hard-core and highly addictive drugs recreationally without developing debilitating addictions. these people never make it into dr. drew’s office so his knowledge of addicts is made up of very serious cases and he isnt dealing with the majority of the recreational types.

    and please, monica, no one cares about you personally thinking she has bipolar. you are not qualified to diagnose anyone and its so ignorant to think you have some god’s eye view of her psyche and know what kind of ‘disorders’ she has. ugh people like you are annoying.

  61. countrybabe says:

    For those of you who insist that she has not had any plastic surgery. Look at her face here and on the wanted posts. She’s not pregnant there.

    Anyway, the Brangeloonies are after Dr. Drew. Perhaps you should take in mind that he is a medical doctor,he’s a psychiatrist. He’s not like Dr. Phil for those of you who don’t comprehend these things. A psychiatrist carries more weight than a psychologist. It’s been my experience that people who work with addictions so closely can pick out someone on the street us is using and may be trying to hide it, when others can’t.

  62. bc says:

    dr. drew is an idiot.

  63. someone says:

    I don’t know if shes on illegal drugs or not..Sometimes she sounds like a moron, with some of the crap that comes out of her mouth. I agree tho, that her charities are self serving. Its called Tax write off. And one time she gave money to her own organization, the Maddox /Jolie Foundation..and then she shut the organization down????.

  64. Cassandra says:

    It’s all in the past, who doesn’t have issues? She’s not on drugs, she just doesn’t have that much make-up on?

    Whatever it is she is beauiful, Hot and a good mother! ๐Ÿ˜‰

  65. someone is a liar says:

    The Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation is very active in Cambodia and Angelina and Brad provide much money to support it. Established in 2003 as the Maddox Jolie Foundation the name was changed in 2007 to the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation. It seeks to erradicate extreme rural poverty, conserving natural resources and wildlife. In addition there is the Maddox Jolie-Pitt project providing health care for children in Cambodia also supported by Angelina and Brad.

    http://www.mjpasia.org

    It is so much easier to lie than spend a few minutes finding the truth for some people.

  66. to countrybabe says:

    I am a practicing psychiatrist and I know that no person can be diagnosed from the safety of one’s armchair in writing an article without ever treating that patient. Never. I am ashamed to have this person in my profession. The almighty $$ means more to him than his professional duties and responsibilities. His patients (if he truly has any) are ill served by his actions.

  67. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    Lola says:
    “Three years ago she was just another actress, now she is a global phenomenon that she wanted to be, commanding a huge salary because of the additional fame…”

    Pre-Lola-prescribed “global phenomenon” salary, in 2003’s Tomb Raider 2: $15 million.
    Post-“global phenom” salary, in 2007’s A Mighty Heart: $1 million.

    Why do you lie so much, Lola? And why all the repeats on this thread? Shouldn’t you be projectile vomiting by now? ๐Ÿ™‚

  68. Judy says:

    This guy is just another quack. He knows nothing about Jollie > He has NO idea of she ever was addicted to heroin. He talks to hear himself talk like Dr. Phil. I think it is time for these people he has been trashing to sue his quack ass. Another phony trying to make a buck of a celeb.

  69. J says:

    WOW! Dr. Drew is a douche bag if he really believes that sh*t. My father-in-law was a heroin JUNKIE. When i say junkie i mean just that. No less than $600 dollars a day of that stuff, every day. He has been sober for 17 yrs w/o having oxycontin or any other bullsh*t replace it. This Dr. Drew just wants to be in the spotlight by saying crap like this. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

  70. bros says:

    thank you to the psychiatrist who posted under “to country-babe” for making the crucial point that you cannot diagnose people without treating/meeting them first.

  71. I choose me says:

    I got nothing to say about Dr. Drew’s comments because its all been said and better than I could but I got something to say to Lola. I think the real Brangeloonie here is you. You and the rest of the haters (countrybabe I’m looking at you) post in nearly every article about Angelina, why? just to say you hate her. As to your claim that the Brangeloonies were backing Dr. Drew when he had shit to say about Tom. You are so full of it! How can you possibly know that those who were backing his comments were fans of Angie. Are you saying that only Angie’s fans hate Tom Crusie? Your logic confounds me. I have never called out someone on this site before ’cause I think its pointless to argue online but you pissed me right the f*ck off. Get help sweetie, your rants are starting to show a dangerous level of obsession.

    Funny thing is I was pretty neutral about the whole Brad, Angie, Jennifer thing till I noticed that almost every article about Brangelina got a knee jerk response. It’s still amazing to me the amount of lies and nonsense gossip that B&A and Jen generate. I’m well aware that there are those that trash Jennifer every chance they get and those people are just as nutso in my opinion. *Shakes head wondering when the madness will end*

  72. Maritza says:

    I agree with 69, this doctor only wants to be in the spotlight, isn’t he the one that said something about Tom Cruise and then had to apologize?

  73. Amy says:

    Wow, I used to love Dr. Drew, but ever since he started doing that stupid VH1 show and making these Dr. Phil-esque statements, he has lost all credibility in my eyes.

    I am not a Brangeloonie, but this was irresponsible. Besides, who cares if her charity work is “self-serving?” At least other people are benefiting from it, too — unlike anything Lohan or Paris does everyday with their meaningless lives.

  74. someone says:

    I didn’t lie about the Maddox/Jolie foundation, I read that she shut it down..She may have reopened it in another name, but she did shut the original one down!

  75. el says:

    Who cares if Angelina is self-serving in her humanitarian efforts? Whether she is doing it for her image, or she actually wants to help the world, the fact is she IS doing something to make the world a better place, more than you & me, and anybody who questions her motives is just retarded. It’s beside the point!

    I dont really care whether she has had plastic surgery, everyone in hollywood has, but its kinda unfair to call her the sexiest woman in the world or the most beautiful when its all the result of a plastic surgeon!

  76. poopie says:

    Angelina : dump your millions to charity and don’t tell ANYONE. Don’t advertise it; Don’t call the paps ! then go away. I don’t care about your exotic spawn babies and am reaaallyyy TIRED of seeing them;

    and she must be using Pitt’s bucks because she CAN’T have made billions based on the movies that SHE has made. Bette Davis she is NOT

  77. ihateangelina says:

    f**k angelina… she’s a husband stealer and a hypocrite!!!!

    go dr. drew!!!

  78. Sandra says:

    Heroin is an extremely dangerous and addictive drug- for all of you who were able to roll over one morning and quit without looking back- god bless- however, you are a freak of an exception- i do not know angie’s intentions for mentioning it- but whatever they are- especially as a very public figure among impressionable young people, it is irresponsible of her to not remind people of how dangerous it is- how people lose everything- that she is the exception- the tragic stories she is aware of and that most people will ae in recoverey the rest of their lives- so if her motive was to help others and not just come across as a badass- that might have been very helpful to someone- not the flippant bullshit she spouted off

  79. Clare says:

    I was neutral about her and Pitt too but the more I see articles about her, the more I hate her and I don’t think she is genuine.

    However Dr Drew has no right to diagonise people in his chair. But he is right about Angelina’s chrity being self serving. 90% of the population think like that anyway. Go out on the streets and ask, most people will tell you that. Stealing a husband was bad for her image, all this is to clean it up, otherwise whe would have done more than be un ambassador before Pitt. I think secretly she is bothered that people hate her and she is doing all she can to change that. How else do you explain taking up charity commitments she cannot keep? You cannot improve education in NY and NO and eradicate poverty everywhere in the third world, with six children etc that is insane, she just want her hand everywhere to get recognised. May be there will be a concert in her memory when she dies, if people eventually start liking her. Which is not soon.

  80. CB Rawks says:

    lola: “she has itched closer to sainthood.”

    Yeah, I’m a bit itchy right now too.

    “It does not take a genius to work out that she does not hold even a single kind bone in her skinny veined body. No kind person treats a fellow human being like she did Aniston.”

    Good grief. What is with these people and their bone-vibrating hatred of someone they don’t even know?
    What I really want to know is, how come so many people yell “Husband stealer!” at the new woman, but don’t direct any anger towards the man who ended the marriage?
    You know lola, it’s actually Brad Pitt who left Aniston, and hurt her. Are you mad at him at all, or do you find some twisted way to let him off the hook? Do you think he’s cute, or something lame like that?

  81. ihateangelina says:

    @ CB Rawks : f**k off…i’m entitled to my own opinion…yeah, brad pitt got tempted but she’s the main reason why brad strayed in his marriage…so yes Angelina is very much a husband stealer…if she did not intend to break the marriage in the first place, why is she with brad???

  82. lola lola says:

    He’s absolutely right about her constant charity being completely self serving. She always makes sure the media know all about it, are present or receive photos covering everything that she did. Pluh-ease!

  83. sue mac says:

    Are you kidding me!!!!Self serving??The world should wish people would choose to self-serv in this manner.I’m no big fan either way-but I know what happened to her.You travel outside your own country for any length of time and those little faces stay with you.Pretty simple.

  84. hmm says:

    It’s not very professional to diagnose someone by reading about them in tabloids. Dr. Drew is not doing his reputation any favors. What if she realized that she was wasting her life and rededicated herself to being a good person after going through her problems? Dr. Drew should spend his time diagnosing his patients and spend less time worrying about Tom and Angelina.

  85. silly lilly says:

    WHY is he speculating on her or anyone else without actually speaking to them?

    The obviouses… TOM CRUISE has SOMETHING wrong with him and lets go all psycho babble.. its mommys fault somehow. MMMKAY??

    Angelina Jolie.. Off Heroin..now addicted to kids. Shocking? NO. Bad childhood? Yes. So what? So what.

    To state that HEROIN Addicts are ALWAYS on something is really unprofessional. While many are on meds to control their urges and alot are on anti depressants… WHO IS HE to out that? If he were her doc ,its a breech of doc/patient confidentiality. If he thought he was helping some addict, he just handed them the reason they dont SEEK help…its “hopeless” and they are “always stigmatized” no matter WHAT they do.

    She definitely transfered her addictions but NOBODY needs a doctor to tell them that. The urge that causes people to self destruct can ALSO be channeled into really productive wonderful things.

    He is interviewing in playboy right? WHy not discuss HEFF and his little 3 some or the book coming out on him with his multiple demons?

    I didnt realize how MANY “doctors” are also armchair warrior tabloid m.d.s!

  86. Diva says:

    So, lola, someone and ihateangelina are all the same person? All three of those names are responding to posts directed to lola, so it would appear the case.

    Kinda funny.

  87. Barton Fink says:

    I am shocked that people don’t know this about heroin. Why do you think that people are put on methadone? Because heroin is just another casually-abused drug, like every other one?

    Can you name an addictive drug that is treated by substitution of another mind-blowing narcotic? No? Didn’t think so.

    Heroin addicts are entirely altered by their use of heroin, in a manner comparable to meth-heads. But with meth-heads, the cravings go away. With heroin users, the cravings are accompanied by sickness, dizziness, vomiting, and intense obsession. Do your research people! Why do you think that Marc Jacobs stopped being human a few years back? He’ll never spring back. Nor will Jolie, likely.

  88. I'm Amaze says:

    TO

    lola, someone and ihateangelina: To quote you you’re saying:
    “f**k offโ€ฆiโ€™m entitled to my own opinionโ€ฆyeah, brad pitt got tempted but sheโ€™s the main reason why brad strayed in his marriageโ€ฆso yes Angelina is very much a husband stealerโ€ฆif she did not intend to break the marriage in the first place, why is she with brad???”

    WHat a iservice you’re doing to Brad, he’s such an idiot that he gets “taken away” by women, like he didn’t know when to resist “temptation”, so, she’s the only guilty party. If you case so much for your “Aniston”, you ought to remember that way before Angelina came in the picture, the rumors about Pitt and Aniston splitting were roaring. It was even rumored that she flew to London as a last ditch effort to “save” the marriage, that she flew back right before his birthday because it didn’t work, that the tell all sign, her not wearing her wedding ring said it all. Now it’s all Angelina’s fault for “stealing” her toy, poor little boy, no will of his own…
    Give me a fucking break! I actually loved Aniston, until all this hatred started, unfairly if I may say so, and although she’s not asking for this insane devotion, she represents it. If you really cared about her,leave her the fuck out your rants.
    As for Angelina, it has all been said by most on this thread. I even read somewhere that she was a fake, that she only donated 8 million last year, WTF? how many movies did she make? a 20M salary dwindles to not much after they get done paying Agents, IRS, etc. T

  89. I'm Amaze says:

    Poor little Brad, he’s so brailess that just about anyone can “steal him away”, he has no willpower of his own..
    Whatever happened to all the rumors way before Angelina came in the picture about Brad and Aniston calling it quits? everyday the speculations ran rampant, is she wearing her wedding ring or not? she supposedly flew to England where he was filming to try to “work out” their issues, returned right before his birthday and the media went haywire as to it was over. I mean, those Aniston lover ought to remember this. I too loved Aniston until all this stupid and irrational hate for Angelina started. If you actually cared for Aniston, you would leave her the fuck out of your hattred spewing thoughts, she doesn’t deserve it, THAT is what polarizes people. In my opinion a sick mind like some on this thread is even worse to an addiction! since ignorance can’t be cured not even joining AA, sad.

  90. Cori says:

    I RARELY comment…in fact, only once, and I have to say, as the daughter of TWO mental health/addiction therapists (one with a masters, the other with a PHD)…it is UNBELIEVABLE that he would condemn her addiction without ever seeing her in his office. TOTALLY inappropriate as a physician!! He took the HYPOCRITIC oath, not the Hippocratic one. DUMB, SELF SERVING, JERKWAD who should get his license yanked.

  91. lola says:

    I am amaze, I post here as Lola, if it has skipped you notice, celebitchy deletes posters who use different names and even bans them. Jaybird being a loonie herself, she would have jumoed at a chance to do this. Being a raving Brangeloonie, you would like to believe that only on eperson hates your saint, poor you, check out polls for most hated woman and you will see who takes the cake. Better still, ask those around you. Even your saint knows this, thus the obsessive do gooding.

  92. daphne says:

    he’s just riding angelina’s coattails to get some extra exposure. he says all this bullshit and still claims that he’s a doctor??? puhlease!

  93. devilgirl says:

    I love Dr.Drew. ๐Ÿ˜€

  94. JB says:

    I believe Dr.Drew is an attention whore! What the hell is the deal with talking about these people suddenly! Maybe it’s because he was neglected or abused and just can’t seem to kick his habits!! Talk about self serving, he’s using these people’s lives to make himself more known! If he is such a good doctor then he shouldn’t be saying these things about people or stating his opinions in public! What ever happened to confidentiality?!!

  95. toosexy says:

    @barton, i agree, people are you forgetting that unlike other drugs, crack ,weed, meth. your BODY is addicted to heroin that’s why you can’t just quit like that, a crackhead is a habitul craving, so is weed, you might crave it but it goes away because your body is not physically addicted unlike heroin, they have to have fix or they become sick, i mean i can’t believe you people don’t know this, dr. drew is absolutey correct, by the grace of god, some might come thru, but more than likeley for heroin their will have to be a treatment to even ween you off the drug. now about her and anniston, why is it hard to believe a man became tempted she is very , attractive woman and sexy, so why wouldn’t a man become tempted, but my problem i dont’ care how much their marriage was on the rocks angeline knew he was married. so she is a homewrecking slut, and i say that because she looks creepy, who wears that much damn black on a regular except red carpet events. she kissed her brother, she wore a vial of blood around her neck, she’s weird and a freak, and i dont think brad is going to last long, but he did leave his wife so he’s going to try and stay as long as possible and then went and adopted these kids and not even married to this woman he’s an ass. but i agree with dr. drew

  96. random anonymous says:

    Cori: that was great. Nice word play!

    What I wonder about their charity work is how often they return to places they’ve donated money to (figuratively). It’s nice to drop a lump sum, but places like that will always need more money. Does anyone know if they follow up? If nothing else, the initial publicity hopefully catches some altruistic hearts. They should pick a charity and donate consistently. Champion a cause and campaign for it.

    I believe all this charity came about as a result of their guilty consciences. I’m not going to play the blame game, but the fact is they both chose to sleep together and not take protective measures; so they conceived a child while Brad was still married. They even admitted to that in interviews. I would have let everyone else do the math and kept my mouth shut. They aren’t really the epitome of class though..

    The point is, if nothing else, the world watches them and no matter what other reprehensible things they might do, at least charities can hopefully benefit from the attention. Only our combined efforts can help the despicable situations that exist, both here and abroad; not to mention preparing to meet those that are to come very soon..

  97. Aw, leave Angie alone, dammit! People are just so damn jealous. Here she is having babies left and right, while trying to help improve the state of life for people in less fortunate countries, and all people can do is continue to dog her down.

    Hey, what have YOU done for the world today???

  98. Anne says:

    I don’t know anything about heroine addiction (thankfully) so I can’t comment on Dr Drew’s statements about AJ and drug use. But, for the first time last night I(bored in a hotel room) watched Dr Drew’s show and it was awful. Incredibly exploitative. It was the last show of the season, the patients had to chose three more months or freedom from the program. I didn’t once see him explain why they might need three months on top of the three weeks which is really just a detox period. No mention of life skills training or how the three month program would work. He told them about it and left them to flounder while trying to make their decision to go or not. All for dramatic effect because at it’s core, this show is nothing but exploitative ‘entertainment’. Self serving for Drew as it’s lining his pockets. I’m sure the success rate from teh show is going to be abysmal.

  99. Jennifer H. in Calgary says:

    I quit smoking 18 months ago and I don’t crave it anymore. I just made the decision to quit, knowing it was bad for me and I needed to stop no matter how uncomfortable I felt. My life is BETTER than ever and I don’t miss smoking. Who is Dr. Drew to take away hope from addicts battling their addiction by implying they can’t ever recover? I can’t believe he’s actually attacking someone for their charity work. I didn’t realize that humanitarian work was a common symptom of a heroin addiction. Perhaps, by that logic, the world would be a better place if we all did drugs.

  100. KPC says:

    Well, don’t they always say you must replace a habit with another habit. By that way of thinking her global charity and intense efforts arounbd the globe would be replacing her urgency to use. She replaced drug use with philanthropy work perhaps…

  101. Nan says:

    Dr.Drew is a tool. Anyone can see it. He is right about Tom Cruise & AJ. Big deal. He should shut his mouth. He’s just using them to point out to the unastute to what the true astute already know. USING them.

  102. Bodhi says:

    Ah yes, lola proving her stupidity once again…

  103. nancy says:

    she was doing heroin in feb 2007 with marilyn manson – he painted a portrait of her showing needles going in her arm and said he painted it that way because that’s who she is.
    She blamed her weight on “breast feeding and losing her mother”, but she couldn’t breast feed because she couldn’t produce milk, and although I’m sure she misses her mother, she knew her mom was dying,but was too busy partying and trying to “hook” Brad to spend time with her.
    And yes, her “charity work” is DEFINATELY self-serving. Jolie doesn’t do ANYTHING without patting herself on the back and taking credit for MORE than she’s done.
    Let’s hope the skanky whore with diarrhea of the mouth STAYS in FRANCE cuz we’re MORE than sick of her!

  104. Bodhi says:

    ^^ AGAIN with the making up of “facts” ๐Ÿ™„

  105. lola says:

    Bodhi, Calm down.

    You have to learn not to take things personally. It does not matter how much you pull out your hair, there are those of us who will forever hate Angelina Jolie and her stupid loser hubby. I won’t lie, if they died now, I would say ‘good riddance to bad rubbish’They are reviling and fake. The earlier you get used to it, the better. ๐Ÿ™

  106. Bodhi says:

    Oh, don’t worry your empty little head lola, I’m as calm as a cucumber. I just think its bullshit literally make up things & pass them off as fact.

    I don’t take the AJ&BP bullshit personally, nor have I lost any hair over them. Hate her all you want, but come up with legit reasons as opposed to the old bullshit you spew.

    And they aren’t married. Get the facts right.

  107. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    Since it’s now cool to do arm-chair diagnosis, allow me.

    “I wonโ€™t lie, if they died now, I would say โ€˜good riddance to bad rubbishโ€™” = PSYCHOPATH

  108. lola says:

    Hey hey Bodhi, for someone who does not take things seriously you surely have a way of showing it, camping here defending them all the time and abusing any one who is not licking their unbathed asses. I would like to see you taking something seriously, boy oh boy, you must get bazookas out when your order is not right at a restaurant. Back off and get a life.

    Angelina supposedly doesn’t mind being hated and lies being told about her, why should you a mere fan care that much. Besides, she loves a challenge and haters make her stronger. I am just indulging her sado-masochist streak afterall ๐Ÿ™„

  109. Bodhi says:

    Lola, honey, back off. I really don’t give a shit what you think about me. I say that I don’t take this shit seriously & I don’t.

    And I have a wonderful life, complete with a fiance, two dogs & no car payment. I don’t need to harsh on celebs or my fellow posters to feel better.

    /end

  110. Mme. Pele says:

    I have now lost respect for Dr. Drew. I had a 5-year addiction to meth and will have been clean 10 years in November. I do not ever crave it any longer.

    I once had a long-term relationship with a former heroin addict who had been completely free of opiates of any sort for over 25 years at the time we were together. We’re still friends 15 years later and my friend is still clean.

    It can be done. I do not consider myself an especially strong or disciplined person, but I kicked a highly addictive habit. If Angelina says she has, I have no reason to disbelieve her – especially based on some undated old photos.

  111. ff says:

    A Playboy interview?

    Credibility revoked!

  112. Michele says:

    Think these photos are from early in the career. If she can realize that she shouldn’t have been married to Billy Bob than anything is possible.

  113. sfh says:

    some people on here are insane, to get so involved in hating some one where it will cause them serious health condition, so what you hate angelina, she is way more popular now than ever before, i never liked her, but now, she is very fascinating, she has done a complete 180 and changed everything about her, give her credit, the past is called a past for a reason, and brad traded up, he jump in with two feet, because he wanted more out of life besides that typical boring holly wood life style and a family and he got both, i love a happy ending, i also read, that all involve including Jennifer say he did not cheat, so i will choose to believe her instead of a bunch of haters who don’t have inside knowledge of anything.

  114. gina says:

    I have a sister who kicked a drug habit 2 years ago. She still goes to counseling three times a week. She fights it everyday. Just because good old Angie is a movie star does not make her any different than anyone else.

    Also there are plenty of charities that can be done without a photo-op. Right now there is severe flooding in the midwest, I have not seen her or Brad or come to think of it, anyone from Hollywood helping them. Just us normal folk. She just has a great pr.

    Side note: To the Brangeloonies posting on this board, I think I might vomit if I read one more time about how jealous of her anyone who dislikes her is.

    There’s a bit of an inconsistency with her being such a martyr and you feeling so sorry for her position and then in the next breath you people glamorizing her.

    You’re incredibly shallow if you believe that beauty, fame, and wealth merits jealousy. What else is there to envy? The low self-esteem to the point of destroying marriages? The family/daddy issues? The eating disorder? The drugs?

    Make up your mind. Then again, I guess everyone with more substance than a puddle and sympathize for Jennifer Aniston must think there’s more to life than wealth and popularity.

  115. Christine says:

    I’m not a big fan of any actors, they are people just like the rest of us – except they are insanely overpaid. I don’t think that their addictions are anyone’s business but their own. I believe that whatever the motivation for their humanitarian efforts, people that need it ARE helped! The most self-serving thing I see going on here is Dr. Drew making a buck (many actually) off of saying sensational, headline-grabbing things about celebrities he’s probably never even met. I never gave Dr. Drew a thought before but I have one about him now – UNPROFESSIONAL to the Nth degree.

  116. Danny says:

    This article to me is indicative of our misunderstanding about drug and alcohol treatment. Dr. Drew, being a thrust into various mediums such as television and radio, has everyone giving this knee-jerk reaction of another tv “doctor.”

    Dr. Drew is and has been an addiction medicine specialist for years now, treats addicts everyday of his life and has devoted his life to treating addiction. He knows when someone is truly sober or not, not because he’s some know-it-all shrink, because he has great experience in the field and he has seem thousands of cases of addiction.

    Do you honestly think that an expert, in ANY field, cannot make a generalization? After seeing and treating thousands of addicts, don’t you think you could make an educated statement on someone’s recovery? There is nobody’s opinion I would want to hear more than Dr. Drew’s on the subject of addiction.

    Recovery is an ongoing, lifelong process. It is not some affliction that can be cured over a couple of weeks. I believe that’s all Drew was trying to say and to have this article attack and misinterpret his words is simply wrong. I’m not here to speak for Drew, but he does not mean that no one can ever be clean from heroin.
    He treats addicts, many of whom have been recovering addicts for years now. Of course he knows that you can be clean off heroin, he is an addiction specialist.

    If you think that an addiction medicine specialist like Drew would down play a person’s recovery or tell them that there is “no hope” is absolutely ludicrous. He speaks from years of experience and wisdom.

    To have everyone attack a man that has devoted his life to treating alcohol and drug addiction, bringing attention to this disease that affects so many people, is hurtful and disrespectful.

  117. jenn says:

    angelina jolie has a bunch of kids, so like any mom she already is regularly engaging in small selfless act s though, duh.
    probably at least as many as dr drew engages in. has dr drew ever been cut open and had little humans pulled from him? breastfed at 2 am , two kids at a time? had to pee too much and puke alot and his whole body swollen up and akward for 9 mos, the whole time whilst feeling exhausted ?
    i’d call all that “small acts of sacrifice” and i know other women would too. so he’s not really thinking. 6 kids is a whole damn lot of kids. even if you have nannnies and all that.

  118. Marie Smith says:

    I just found this site by accident. I have to tell you a story that you won’t believe…About 1 year ago I had a customer, (I own a business about 30 miles north of L.A.)who came in to my business, and his wife runs a methodone clinic here in our community. We got to talking about addiction and her,(his wife’s) business, and how busy she was. He told me that Angelina was a regular patient there. This is before she announced she was pregnant with her twins, (just rumors of her pregnancy)…She also at the time, was living in Malibu with her family. I remember seeing paparazzi swarming her home. You can easliy get to our community in about 45 minutes from Malibu, as my husband and I take day trips to Malibu. He said that she was addicted to vicodine and was being treated with methodone. He also informed me that they had ton’s of celebrities, and well known people that use this clinic, as it is far enough away from the prying eyes of “Hollywood”, I was shocked when he told me this…(she was rumored to be pregnant)and he said he had seen her in the clinic several times! I had seen several interviews with Angelina over the years and had always thought she looked like she was addicted to opiates. Both of my grown children have been addicted to Heroin and I know the signs, (dialtion of pupils, slow and jerky body movements), also the same way that Heath Ledger looked in several of his interviews. I would never judge Ms. Jolie, but I can tell you that you NEVER completely get off the drugs, and she is the perfect example of an addictive personality,enveloping herself with children allows her to live in a world of self denial. We will come to find out in years to come that she has had a drug addiction. The only thing I can say is, this doesn’t mean that she is a bad person, she was and is a product of Hollywood, and our society. I hope that God blesses her with help, and her children give her hope.

  119. THE MACHINE says:

    Dear Dr. Drew,

    First of all, I think that the Tiger Woods affair may be irretrievable. He may admit to all the things he did; however, his wife is so angry that I doubt that she will be willing to move on with him ever again!

    This being said, when it comes to sex and the differences between men and women, it is my theory that men have this built in instinct: “I want to get into her pants”. This applies to every woman a man (or most men who are heterosexual when applying statistical regression analysis) is interested in. No matter how subtle or pleasant a man is in his approach, this is a built in mechanism in the back of most men’s heads. A woman may not realize this- she thinks that he is simply talking about whatever but the man is thinking- “I like her body, I like her smell, I like the way she moves, and so on”! I also believe that a lot of women may be this way too- even though they are not admitting it either!!

    THE MACHINE

  120. Tralalala says:

    Marie Smith of December 31 2008, your comment is old but I still have to correct something you wrote, which puts your whole post in doubt for me. Opiates DO NOT cause dilation of the pupils. They cause the pupils to contract to pinpoints, even in low light situations. This is not opinion. It is medical fact. Slow and jerky bodily movements are signs of many different types of substance abuse. Many opiate addicts are spazzy when high, just like you would expect a coke addict to be. When a person develops a physical dependency to any opiate, the side effects become different than those that would be present for an occasional user or someone who is taking a prescription painkiller for a short period of time. Maybe your kids were using something along with heroin…alcohol, a stimulant of some sort, etc? There are common side effects and clues to opiate abuse but those you listed are not really on the list of common signs.

  121. ugh says:

    Thank you for correcting the lies and slanderous vitriol that Pinsky’s comments re Angelina inevitably encourage from the raging bitter ‘Team’ Aniston kooks, that have been on the job full-time hating her for the past 6 years. It seems that with every year Aniston goes manless and childless, it seems Jolie is punished for her perceived misery by some bitter cows on message boards. This qwack Pinsky, just this week, has once again gone back to those long Angelina/Brangelina coattails to get some ink and publicity – this time for his ‘new’ show on HLN. It seems the only addict is Pinsky for using Angelina Jolie, a mom and humanitarian to garner press for himself. I think he needs a 12 step program to ween himself off the propensity to attack young women he doesn’t know, has never met, and who have young children who may read his slander of their mother.

  122. seagodess says:

    Sounds more like Chelsea and Aniston put (or paid) this so called “doctor” to write this article to bash Jolie to make Aniston feel better. A real doctor wouldn’t give such an opinion on someone he doesn’t know and didn’t even take the children into consideration. This is another senseless attack by Aniston.

  123. Hello there says:

    Hi there superb weblog! Will blogging and site-building this way have to have a lot of perform? Iโ€™ve hardly any expertise in development however I was hoping to start my very own website quickly. In any case, when you have any kind of tips or perhaps tips for fresh blog masters please reveal. I understand that is off subject matter on the other hand simply necessary to inquire. Thank youa yeah the best Escort is norway believe me!!eskorte piker