Kirstie Alley claims she lost 38 inches from going from a size 12 to a 6

wenn5662232

Here are some newish photos of Kirstie Alley out and about in NYC yesterday. She and Maksim did several television interviews together, and Kirstie kept this great red dress on throughout the day, showing off her much trimmer figure. As we’ve heard again and again, Kirstie literally has no clue how delusional she sounds about her size. While she has truly lost so much weight, and she looks great and so much healthier, Kirstie consistently shoots herself in the foot by claiming to be much smaller than she is in reality. First, she claimed that when she started DWTS, she was a size 12, and she quickly went down to a size 8. Then she doubled down and claimed that she was now a size four or six. This is where she’s holding, with some extra delusion and nonsensical math on the side:

Kirstie Alley could not look more amazing if she tried. She may not have won Dancing with the Stars on Tuesday, but her hard work earned her a brand new body!

“My dress is half the size it was when we started,” Kirstie admitted on the show’s finale.

Wow, what a feat!

Kirstie wore the same dress on Tuesday that she wore on the show’s first episode — but it had to be taken in 38 inches! The DWTS runner-up went from a size 12 to a “stretchy size six.”

“The great thing is, I can wear all the dresses from when I was really, really skinny,” she tells USA Today. “But I have more work to do. I need to do some weights and some yoga. And I’ll keep dancing. But only Latin dances.

The actress seems happier than ever with her fit body! “[The show has] made me alive again,” Kirstie said to Us Weekly. “It’s given me a new view of what I want to do in my life.”

[From Hollywood Life]

So… her dress was taken in 38 inches and she thinks she was a size 12 when she started and now she’s a “stretchy” size six. The “38 inches” number absolutely fascinates me. Is she just making this junk up as she goes along, or is someone feeding her this stuff and she buys it hook, line and sinker? Once again, congratulations to her and I hope she can keep it up. But methinks part of the “larger issue” with Kirstie’s yo-yo weight is that THE BITCH IS CRAZY and she’s just really bad with numbers.

abc_studio_celebs_05_wenn5662236

abc_studio_celebs_02_wenn5662233

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

127 Responses to “Kirstie Alley claims she lost 38 inches from going from a size 12 to a 6”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Franny says:

    I doubt she can even walk straight with the 7 layers of spanx she has on

  2. curegirl0421 says:

    Okay. Not a size 6 at all. Maybe a 16, which is FINE. JUST FINE.

    KRISTIE WE DO NOT CARE. Nobody cares what size you are. Not nobody, not nohow.

    Are you healthy? Do you feel good? That’s all that matters!

    Geez. *headshake*

  3. XIOnce says:

    Never seen a size six with cankles. Just saying. She looks about a 14 – 16 right now. I wonder how tall she is…

  4. MSMLNP says:

    While I think she looks really good, clearly her multi-layered spanx have served as a tourniquet to her brain, causing delusion.

  5. brin says:

    Oh Kirstie please.

  6. Kate says:

    WHAT IS WRONG WITH HER LEGS??? They have ABSOLUTELY the worst shape I have EVER seen – CANKLES ANYONE???? A 6? in Xenu sizes that is a 14. LOL

  7. fannomore says:

    geez, why she have to go there? It’s enough she’s not miss piggy anymore isn’t it? why can’t she be happy instead of fantaSIZING?

  8. Quest says:

    Kirstie is looking healthier than she has is years and I am loving the curves (spanx or not). However, I don’t know why these ladies keep fooling themselves or think they are fooling us about their size.

  9. megan says:

    This woman is now purely famous for weight loss and weight gain and nothing else! Off with her head!

  10. shockedandappalled says:

    Oh, come on. She doesn’t look like a size 16 now. Maybe a 10 or 12, depending on the measurements. Probably 12. But 6 is just not possible.

  11. samanthalous says:

    Ok she can retire from dieting and her failure at diet math

  12. NotaHater says:

    She probably is a size 6 dress. I keep reading these posts about how people are delusional, but your dress size is smaller than your pant size (most of the time). I can wear a 4 or 6 dress and a 10 pant. I would be willing to bet we are talking dress size only here.

  13. Nina says:

    Even with vanity sizing, I doubt she’s a 6. Maaaaaaybe an 8 if it’s a dress with stretch but she’d definitely not be able to wear that size in pants, not with those calves.

    But really, women’s clothing sizes are completely jacked. Why can’t we just go off measurements like men’s clothes? I’m 5’10″, 140 lbs and my jeans are labeled size 4. Riiiiight. Back in the 80s when I was anorexic and weighed nearly 40 lbs less, I was a size 4 then as well. Obviously today’s size 4 is nothing like it was in the past.

    It’s rather insulting. No wonder women have such problems with body image.

  14. suckit says:

    Holy Shit guys, she’s 60!! Plus, she could easily be a size six. I watched the finale and standing next to Kym Johnson–who is probably a negative size something–she didn’t look that much bigger. Do you realize she was probably pushing 50 before she even started packing on the pounds? I can’t wait to see what most of the rest of us look like at 60.

  15. original kate says:

    she looks fine but no way is she a size 6, more like a 12.

  16. b says:

    i don’t know what size she is but she looks a lot better now. she needs to keep dancing.

  17. common sense says:

    I’m guessing she lost 38 inches total- not just from her waist. That is certainly reasonable. Don’t be stupid. She didn’t lose 38 inches from her waist alone and that’s not what the article is claiming.

    She still isn’t a 6 though.

  18. Kisha says:

    I’d guess a size 10 maybe a 12 without Spanx on.

  19. girlnone says:

    I’d believe she went from a size 20ish to a size 14ish, but unless she has her staff cut the labels out of all her clothes and replace them with vanity sizing, there’s no way she could think she’s a size 6.

  20. lucy2 says:

    She’s looking good, but I agree she looks more like a 12 now. If she’d shut up about the numbers, people would just be complimenting her instead of saying yeah right.
    I hope not for her sake, but I won’t be surprised if she gains it back.

  21. Kaboom says:

    Spanxed within an inch of bullet-proofness

  22. fabgrrl says:

    No, that is not a SIX. Unless Kirstie is four feet tall, which she isn’t, that is not a six. Why is she so crazy? When I was pregnant and nearly 200 pounds, I could put my size six clothes ON my body (but not zip, pull down, or button them up) that did not make me a six!

  23. dh says:

    she looks great, Im happy for her- but no way she was less than a 18-20 when she had her own reality show. now shes a 12. bless her heart.

  24. Kloops says:

    I’d guess she’s a 12 in pants, 10 or maybe an 8 in dresses. But whatever. I wish she’d stop talking about her weight bc it just fuels all gossip that she claims she hates. Regardless, she’s batsh*t crazy so all the weight will be back in a year. Maybe 6 months.

  25. Ron says:

    Not a 6. NOT A 6. My Mom does the same thing. “Oh I can;t possibly wear that it’s a 10.” Just because you have one blouse that happens to be labeled a size 6, DOES NOT make your size 10 body a size 6. I have a pair for pants labeled, “large size 32″ the large part I totally buy, size 32 um yeah, I haven’t seen those digits since the days before Madonna had botox.

  26. vanessa says:

    The only thing I see in this picture is Maksim.

  27. fizixgirl314 says:

    OK OK WE GET IT… you don’t think she’s a size 6… jeez… good for her, she looks great… BUT DAMN STOP TALKING ABOUT IT!!!

  28. S says:

    whats with her legs? looks like water in her legs? are her kidneys still working? Or are the layers of spanx killing her bloodstream?
    She looks NOT good in these pics…

  29. Brittany says:

    Well, she is a Scientologist, so there is obviously some impaired thinking on her part…

  30. Slim Charles says:

    I think it’s very hard to tell someone’s size from a photo. And you know she’s just going to gain it back, because I don’t think she’s made any changes to her lifestyle. IT’S OKAY.

  31. Novaraen says:

    She is NOT a 6. Holy crap talk about body dysmorphia!! She is probably a 12-14 now. Delusion, thy name is Kirstie!

  32. Happymom says:

    Oh my god-I give her huge props for losing so much weight and looking great-especially at her age. However-she is absolutely no smaller than a 14. She looks about my size-there is NO fricking way she’s in single digits.

  33. bluhare says:

    She drives me nuts. That being said, the woman is 60. She looks AMAZING for age 60.

  34. DGO says:

    She’s not even a 12 now, let alone when the show started.

  35. Jackson says:

    Oh, Kirstie.

    Which is my nice way of saying ‘Bitch, please.’

    I really do applaud her for what she’s accomplished. She looks really good now. But she needs to stop with the ‘size 6′ talk. It makes me remember what a wacko she is.

    ETA: Does anyone know who makes that dress? I like it a lot. And if she’s wearing a six I will be ecstatic to find out what size I will wear. Size 0 here I come!

  36. Mikki says:

    Ah, she looks great! That’s the best I’ve seen her hair look in awhile too. I just hope she is able to keep the weight off now – maybe she can get Maks to be her personal dancing trainer! He could certainly motivate me!

  37. MJ says:

    I’m happy for Kirstie and think she looks fabulous, but even a size 12-14 is being kind… or maybe if she shops at Wal-Mart or Target. I am a real size 14 and am at least 30 lbs lighter than her! Marilyn Monroe was a 14.

    Check out the US Standard Clothing Size chart on Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_standard_clothing_size#Women.27s_sizes

    If Kirstie was a true size 6, her waist would have to be 26.5″. I think not! I’d guess she is more like a true 18-20.

    Like I said, she looks great and I am not judging her appearance, just her delusion. If she’s really for positive body image, she shouldn’t lie about her size.

  38. hairball says:

    Why do women put so much value on what size they wear? As if that’s the greatest achievement in life one can have?

    You don’t see men holding press conferences on their weight.

  39. Tiffany says:

    I am just stunned at the absurdity here. She is 5’10″. I’m an inch shorter and I am a 10 on the bottom and she has 2 sizes on me-at least! She looks good, but who cares about your size, why lie so obviously? She must have started close to a 24 and wound up a 16, and that is fine.
    A six? Ha Ha, at my height at a size 8 (I just put on 10 lbs after moving back here from abroad with no car), I look thin. I still look way smaller than her, she isn’t even close to a 10. And her cankles and calves are huge still. If she was a 6 at her height, she would be approaching model size. Ugh, No.
    Why do these people (just saw new pics of KimK’s size 4, cough, ass) think we buy these fantasy stories. Tom Criuse is really 6 feet tall and John Travolta is straight and has a full head of hair!

    In jeans a 32 is a size 12, 31 a 10 and 30 inch is a 8. I can wear a 30 jean. There is no way in hell she is a 28 or 29 in a designer jean. My 13 year old is a size 4/6 and wears a 27 and is tiny. Kirstie, you are one crazy bitch, please find another way to measure your life other than your size.

  40. jane says:

    There’s no way. I refuse to even consider Kirstie Alley wears a smaller size than me haha

  41. Sumodo1 says:

    I second that earlier earlier motion for: “Bitch, please!”

  42. Lala11_7 says:

    I loves me some Kirstie…I truly do…

    But…Kirstie…STOP!!! Just stop talking about your size and focus on how wonderful you look and feel…

    Because…

    I. Can’t. With the size 6…

  43. KateNonymous says:

    I have a friend who used to do this in college. She’d say, “Oh, I can’t wear your size 10. I’m an 8.” And she clearly was at least two sizes larger than the person she was talking to.

    The difference? That was college, and she grew out of it. But my guess here is that Kirstie has no idea what size she’s wearing, but knows that she’s lot smaller, and what size she WANTS to be, and just decided that she’s there.

  44. fizixgirl314 says:

    hairball, because women are stupid… I’m convinced!

    While men are out there ruling the world, we’re singing songs about it in our lingerie. After 41 posts of people saying she’s not a size 6, I think we get it… Women need to re-prioritize :-/

  45. cranky_chica says:

    Size aside, she changed her body – and fast. I’m waiting to see what happens to her body over the next ten weeks.

    And the ankles and leg shape are troubling. Does she have a circulation problem?

    I admire her. When she took that leap into Max’s arms, I was certain he would fall on the floor. When he didn’t, and she spread her arms to complete the move, she became my hero.

    Keep kickin’ ass, Kirstie. You make 60 seem like something I can welcome.

  46. TurquoiseBlue says:

    MJ, Marilyn Monroe was not a size 14. That’s one of those ‘feel good’ myths that people keep repeating, but it’s nonsense.

    http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/mmdress.asp

  47. Cheyenne says:

    For Christ’s sake, who does she think she’s kidding? She left out a digit. That dress is a size 16, not a 6. If she’s a 6, I’m a minus-4.

  48. feebee says:

    I don’t think women would worry about the sizing so much if our clothes were sized like men’s or maybe just not much wild variation. You can take half a dozen of the “same” size from different designers/retailers and none of them will be the same size. It drives us bonkers but we as consumers put no pressure on the suppliers. Is it because if we did the snarky bitches (and they’re probably predominately male) would just make some derogatory (sp?) remarks about being too fat to fit into their clothes? Is it any wonder we’re fucked up over sizing.

    Having said that (!), Kirstie is undoing some of the goodwill by insisting on a certain dress size. It makes her sound delusional but she looks fab and I’ll buy she dropped six sizes but she started in a 16-20…. :)

  49. girlindisguise says:

    She’s a size 6 in Xenu wear, maybe. I’m guessing she’s a 14 on a good day.

  50. garvels says:

    Who cares what size she is…she looks happy and healthy after her major weight loss efforts-good for her!

  51. Rhiley says:

    Good call, girlindisguise. She looks a lot better, and for 60, I have to say, she looks pretty damn good, but as all of you have commented, she ain’t no size 6. I am a size 6 and I am 5’8, 144 pounds. I am pretty toned and fit. Kristie still has cankles and a big belly. I am thinking she is probably a 12/14, and that she started at 22/24.

  52. Lauralee says:

    Allow me to say that I saw her a few days ago not far from her Organic Liaison place and this woman is not remotely close to a size 6!!! I saw her when she opened it I believe in February and she was clearly in the 16-18 .. Most of her weight was concentrated in her lower body. And as a stylist clearly I can say she’s a 10-12.. And spandex will tuck you in down to 2 sizes. If she stops bs’ing us that will be fine. That will be honorable and remarkable. Now she should stop about bragging about the “wonderful 10 sizes loss” because when when will start to pack on and more well, she will go on hiding again.

  53. LBeees says:

    Of course she lost 32 inches…. six from her hips, six from her waist, six from her bust, six from right thigh, six from left thigh… you get the picture.

    LOL

  54. Rebecca says:

    “While men are out there ruling the world, we’re singing songs about it in our lingerie.” Damn right, fizixgirl314.

  55. Sarah Talks says:

    She looks like a size 12.

    Maybe 6 is her goal. They say you should speak it into existence even if it’s not true at the moment.

    She definitely looks like 12 is where she is now and not where she started.
    She was probably 20+ when the show began.

    Anyway she looks great and she’s an old lady so if she fudges numbers or forgets them it’s no big deal.

    Old women lie about numbers all the time, mostly their age. But what older woman tells the truth when it comes to numbers?

    And it’s not good etiquette to ask a woman her age or dress/shoe size, anyway.

  56. The Bobster says:

    Lt. Savak might be a 6 on the planet Vulcan.

    BTW, those calves are disturbing. Are they due to a drug reaction?

  57. Rachael says:

    If she is the same size as I am I’ll eat my dog. She is not a 6, nor was she a 12 when she started.

  58. Turtle Dove says:

    @ (#4): LOL.
    .
    @13: I completely agree. I have a pair of jeans that I wore in 1994 that I still love and can easily fit into – size 10. Another pair from early 2000 – size 8. Right now I’m a size 6. I’m the EXACT same size.

  59. HRH says:

    She looks much better. And she’s always had cankles, even back when she was on Cheers and was very thin.

  60. Mari says:

    Not gonna lie. She looks pretty dang good!
    Who cares what size she is. Even if she wants to say she’s a size zero I applaude any weightloss on women because *THAT”S WHAT WE WOMEN SHOULD DO*. Be *HAPPY* for someone else!!

  61. LindaR says:

    Liar, liar, fat pants on fire.

  62. LindaR says:

    By the way, to those couple of posters that are complaining about the number of comments on this topic. It’s a “comments” section. People post here because they want to “comment”. Just like you did.

  63. wtf? says:

    so is that like when a guy says i’m a 9 inch and its only a 5?

  64. DreamyK says:

    She’s a 18-20 now. Looks very good, btw.

  65. Wendy City says:

    I think the outrage comes from Kirstie thinking that we are all stupid and we will buy any bull she sells, whether it is a flat out lie is irrelevant. Eventhough we can see the truth with our own eyes and make sense of it. She will lie to us like we are idiots and she thinks that people believe. That’s what angers me. I could care less what size she is. Just don’t lie about it like I am some idiot.

  66. sandra says:

    she looks amazing
    who gives a shit about her ankles?
    we are our worst enemies!
    what’s she sup to do, hide her legs til she dies?
    helen mirren also has cankles and so does hillary and plenty of other awesome women
    it happens

  67. Amanda G says:

    She looks fabulous, but that’s definitely not a size 6 body. Maybe a 10 or 12…definitely not a 14 or higher like some others are saying. In the end, who cares? I wish she’d stop embarrassing herself like this.

  68. gg says:

    16 in pants. Her lower half is still on the large side. Which is just fine, nobody cares! She needs to focus on exercising because if she stops she will balloon right back up as we’ve seen. She has a huge regain factor. I’m just sick and tired of the constant number updates which are lies. Tell yerself, Kirsty, nobody else is listening!

  69. Dingles says:

    I’m convinced that in Hollywood the sizes only range from 0-8, and after 8 the size of the pants keep getting bigger but they still slap an 8 on the tag. That way every woman, whether she weighs 100 lbs or 200 lbs, can feel skinny.

  70. ZenB says:

    She’s lost a lot of weight. She is a lot more toned than she has been in a while but she is as big as I am (14-16) which means she *has* lost about 50lbs… good job Kirstie – why make enemies and make yourself look foolish. And what is with the water retention on the ankles? She’s 60 she can’t be pregnant.

  71. rkintn says:

    I really wish Kirstie would get past this whole size obsession thing. I am constantly AMAZED that she is 60! 60 FFS! She was just amazing on DWTS AND she got to dance with THE hottest guy on the show! I would much rather here about what went on with her and Maks than her size any ole day;)

  72. Jen34 says:

    She’s a pear shaped 12 – 14.

    Sizing these days is just so wrong. I just bought a pair of size 4 capris from Ann Taylor. I am not in anyway a size 4. I’m an 8. I can’t even imagine what size a really thin person would wear.

  73. Crash2GO2 says:

    “hairball, because women are stupid… I’m convinced!

    While men are out there ruling the world, we’re singing songs about it in our lingerie. After 41 posts of people saying she’s not a size 6, I think we get it… Women need to re-prioritize :-/”

    *applause*

  74. Crash2GO2 says:

    @Jen34: It’s hell. The only store I can find pants that fit me is The Limited. Other than that it’s the Junior’s section, and that’s all mostly crap trendy stuff.

  75. Minx2 says:

    I think she’s a 14 now, maybe a big 12. Though American sizes have gotten big over the years.. still, it’s fun to buy a shirt that’s labeled “M” (10-12)in the US while in France it’s “XL” (European size 40-42). Love American vanity sizing :)

  76. Berman says:

    She has scary crypt keeper hands.
    But she does look good..Waddle removed and all. Let her enjoy the attention.

  77. louise says:

    She’s probably a size 12. Saying she’s 16-20 is way to high.

  78. LunaT says:

    Can’t remember where I read this, but….sizing on women’s clothing has changed over the years. The numbers have gone down but the clothing remains the same size ie what used to be a size 12 is now a 2(or something like that. Don’t remember the specifics). Anyone remember when Calvin Klein introduced size 0?

    I’ve said it before. I’ll say it again. I think Kirstie is on something. When she talks, she sounds like someone who parties a lot. Anyone else notice this? It’s like she’s mildly drunk or on pills or something.

  79. Maritza says:

    She does look great for a 60yr old but no way is she a size 6, a 12 or 14 maybe. Maksim is such a hunk, I wonder if he is still dating Erin?

  80. Carolyn says:

    I’m Australian and US vanity sizing is just plain funny yet sad at the same time. Thank goodness Kirstie has lost all that unhealthy weight – she looks amazing for 60 and as others have said, should just be happy with that. This size nonsense is PR to keep us talking about her.

  81. Kim says:

    Well she does say stretchy 6. She could be size 10 and thats a big loss from the size she was so she should be commended.

    Anyway you cut it she has lost weight.

    I LOVE that she says she can wear clothes from when she was skinny/size 6. Hollyweird considers size 6 obese so i love that at least she recognizes 6 is small!

  82. matt says:

    I still find it amazing that she is 60 yrs old! She looks great! But she needs to stop with the ‘i’m a size six’ nonsense.

  83. Alex says:

    I’m a 12-14, and smaller than her. Not by much – she could squeeze into 14 as long as she doesn’t need to breathe…

  84. Lucy says:

    Maybe her organic liason weight loss drink has some kind of drug in it that make you delusional….size 6 my ass..(and I wish my ass WAS a size 6)

  85. Alison E says:

    To be fair, vanity sizing in a lot of stores these days could be making her delusional. For example, I can fit in what Target calls a size 6, and aww, thank you Target, but HA HA. NO.

  86. Solveig says:

    She’s making a career of gaining and losing weight, it must affect her wealth in a good way, but I wonder how much this is affecting her health in the wrong way.

  87. antisara says:

    If this whale is a six then I’M A SIZE
    -5 FOR SURE! what’s this piggy been smoking lately??? ah yeah! SCIENTOLOGISTS SIZES ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE REAL ONES, SO A 6 IN SCIENTOFREAK IS A 3X IN REAL WORLD SIZE! KAPISH? that’s fine, once she’s out of DWTS, mark my words, she will swell back to a comfy 10X…LMAO

  88. apsutter says:

    There is no way in hell she is a size 6! Look at her freakin legs..she still has cankles for christs sakes!

  89. Stephy2585 says:

    Hmm.
    There’s no way the woman is a 14.
    I’m a 12 and she’s not bigger than me…
    I’m gonna say she’s an 8-10 realistically…Remember ladies and gents, the camera adds pounds..
    She doesn’t look large next to that guy in the photo. She looks kinda svelte actually..
    Unfortunately for her, her apendages that show (ie: her legs/ankles/shins) just don’t get as slimmed down as they should when she loses weight..But I’d buy her dress size to be somewhere between 8-10.

  90. Tiffany says:

    For those of you saying she is a 10 or 12, you, respectfully, are crazy. She is at least 25 pounds heavier than me. At least! She is a 16 or I will eat my hat. I have been that size when my thyroid disease was raging. She isn’t any smaller than that. Period. She is super tall as well. It’s ridiculous to think she is a 10. I am a 10 and way smaller.
    It’s great that she is doing so well, but anyone who thinks that is a 12 or less is craaaazzzzzy.

  91. Petra Siva says:

    I am as tall as her around 5’9.She is not a size six.I had a lap band last year and lost almost 120 pound’s.I weigh in the 190′s.My leg’s hip’s and stomach are way smaller and I am pushing 50.I wear a 14 almost now so she is crazy,drunk,or just want’s publicity because this is not a size 6.

  92. Petra Siva says:

    Yes Luna T.I have noticed that too.She even said on Dancing that she didn’t feel sexy unless she had a beer.

  93. MourningTheDeathofMusic says:

    This seems to be par for her course. She lied about her weight size when she did her big Oprah reveal all those years ago and she’s doing it again. I would bet money she’s a solid 16.

  94. truthzbetta says:

    fizixgirl314:

    Here, here.

    I too am over with dieting and jiggly dancing in our undies being the go to moves for “women’s empowerment.”

    They’re both signs of the exact opposite.

  95. LunaT says:

    @PetraSiva–so I’m not the only one. Not like I wanna be right, but something hits me funny watching her talk. Like she’s little slurry. And I just get the vibe it’s from more than just alcohol. She’s not white powder jacked, not herb stoned, but like a habitual user of something.

    No matter her dress size, it’d be cool if she talked about feeling good about herself w/out talking about her weight or dress size. Lots of different shapes and sizes can be sexy.

  96. Kasey says:

    @XIOnce and cranky_chica: She has cankles which many thin/skinny women have. Take a look at Cheryl Cole.

    I hate US vanity sizing. I have a 4, 6, 8 (maybe a 10 in my closet). It irks me so to always have to take about 3 sizes of something to try on especially since my boobs throw everything off. When healthy and happy at 38-28-38 I’m a 6/4.

    It is HIGHLY plausible that she lost 32 inches all over but I think Kirstie started the show as a 16/18 and is now down to a 10/12, possibly VERY stretchy 8 DRESS. 2 days ago I squeezed my (what I think) 6/8 body into a friend’s 2 jeans but could NOT zip them up. I’m not getting why Kirstie is so obsessed with the numbers when she is so clearly wrong. She looks great and I hope she is able to maintain healthiness.

  97. kristen says:

    she looks good she could lose more but she Already said she still wants` to keep the work up ! good for her and yeah I agree almost all celebs wear spandex shes` prob. still aware of what she had before so for some reason she felt she needed to have some of her weight tucked in or something.

  98. Scarlet Vixen says:

    Kirstie Alley isn’t really that tall–she’s 5’7″. I’m 5’10″ and 170lbs with an athletic build, and I’m an American sz 12. So, I’m guessing she’s no smaller than a 12, closer to a 14-16.

    Her transformation over the DTWS season was amazing, and I think she should be commended for losing the weight and being a great dancer. She looks great for 61yrs old! But, I agree with other posters that her fibbing about her actual size detracts from her successful weight loss. She’d get alot more kudos if she was honest and believable.

  99. Laurie says:

    No way is she a size 6. Maybe she was measuring her cankle & it is a size 6?

  100. jamie says:

    I think she look’s great,can really see the weight lose in her face.Don’t think she’s a size 6 ,I’m an 8 and way smaller then her lol the question is will she keep it off now that the show’s over ? or are we going to see her pic on the front of a magazine in a month looking huge again!

  101. Mary Jane says:

    I ne’er realised Maksim was such a fox…

  102. Wil says:

    Kirstie has ALWAYS been delusional about weight and size. We are similarly built and when she had “Fat Actress” out she did an interview where she said at her heaviest she was 185. BS! I was about the same size as her and I was tipping the scales at about 275. Now she says she is a Six?!?! Nope. She is probably 16 to maybe 18 without Spanx. She looks great, but she needs to stop with the BS sizing. Just tell folks you have lost more weight, are looking to lose more and get more healthy.

  103. khaveman says:

    No matter what the size is, she needs to keep the weight off and eat a healthy diet. Fit and healthy, not a number.

  104. Val says:

    Ha ha ha ha ha – Scientologists can’t measure either!

    She started out way over a 12 – maybe a 20 – 22, now she’s a 12, 14, 16 or so.

    Why detract from her decent performances and wonderful weight loss by lying about her sizes?

  105. skinanny says:

    she looks like a 12 now. Is she joking? A size 6, I thought she said she was a 4?

  106. Marianne says:

    It is clear that she has lost of weight, and she is looking really good. But size 6, she ain’t. Im an 8, and a lot smaller than she is.

    But still congrats Kirstie.

  107. snapnhiss says:

    Suckit, she started putting on a lot of weight back in her Cheers days around *checks Wikipedia* 1988 when she was in her late 30s. She’s struggled with her weight for decades, not just since she turned 50.

    Anyway, it’s no skin off my nose if she wants to deceive herself about her dress size. She really does look lovely and I’m particularly impressed with her bare arms. I would have thought she’d have some extra skin hanging off the back of her upper arms. Her cankles are worrying though, I hope it’s not health related.

  108. RHONYC says:

    i see this bitch done went and got a case of the J-Huds!

    i abundantly H-A-T-E when these whores lie about sh*t like this. :twisted:

    lookit. Kirstie Alley is 5’7″ and WAS a size 2/4 when she did ‘Cheers’ standing next to Ted Danson a BILLION YEARS AGO!!!

    SO! i wonder how my big ass at 5’10″, with 38D-34-38 wearing a size 10/12 is SKINNIER than this lyin’ ass bitch in photos. riddle me THAT!

    officially can’t stand her now. :-(

  109. observer says:

    Scientologists are so delusional. Kudos to her for losing weight, but there is no way she is a 6. She is at the very least a 14.

  110. lisa says:

    Hell no.. I am 5’8 and wear a 10.

    she is not a 10 or 12

    she is a 14 or 16. that is the average for women. I use to wear a 14 and never had a gut or weight on my legs. I was all hip.. which I had to work my ass of to get down to the size I could live with. I have a friend that is a 6 and she is no where near Kristie’s size. Why is it necessary for these women to talk about clothing sizes. We all know that any size changes depending on the item. I can wear a 10 or sometimes I have to get a 12.

    I hate that her success is always based on weight loss. She is putting too much “weight” on it..and the media that is celebrating with her today will eat her alive if she gains any of it back.

    OH an my size 10 is without any added support. All natural (no spanx). YEAH BABY. lol

  111. lola lola says:

    It’s great that she lost weight and is in better shape and healthier but the delusional statements just make people lose interest in her. Sad. That said, she always has such beautiful hair! I’m so jealous. The messier it gets, the better it looks. amazing.

  112. the original bellaluna says:

    I love that she is healthier-looking than when she was heavier. And when she was heavier, girlfriend was a 26/28. She’s now a 16. There is no argument that will persuade me otherwise.

    And I like her. I really do. I just wish she would shut up already.

  113. the original bellaluna says:

    @ fizixgirl314 – I think I love you.

    Women need to stop wagging ass and start kicking ass instead! MUWAH!

  114. RHONYC says:

    @ lisa

    YOU. MY. DOG! FOR REAL THO!

    ‘all real size 10/12, 12/fo’ teen bitches….putcha hands up!!! ;-)

    P.S.- NOTE TO KIRSTIE ALLEY’S PUBLICIST:

    uhhhhh, mimicking the ‘Kim Kardashian’ parted-lip,’Herve Leger’ tight bandage dress look, looks P-A-T-H-E-T-I-C on her 50-something ASS!!!

    i am EMBARRASSED to have EVER liked her as a comedic actress with this current behavior. :-(

  115. Delusional says:

    She is at least a 16. Her legs and butt are huge!

  116. eternalcanadian says:

    Lolz @ the size six. That is so not true and Kirstie needs to stop lying. Size 12 is more like it. Look at her hips and belly. Never mind her breasts There is no way that’s a six. I say 12 minimum more like 14 comfortably. Lying about being size six just demeans people that look at Kirstie for inspiration and see they’re the same shape but the clothing size label says otherwise. :|

  117. B says:

    I concur with others in wishing that Kirstie would stop with the delusion and just enjoy the fact that she’s making 60 looking fantastic.

    Regarding the cankles…some of us have them, regardless of weight. I personally have thick bones/ligaments, so I have the dreaded “cankle” from a side-view, no matter how little I’ve weighed. I thought that I’d point that out, for the be-cankled among us: it’s not always a side-effect of obesity.

    I whole-heartedly agree that the vanity sizing is ridiculous and frustrating. Consistency in sizing would be wonderful. Besides; numbers on a scale or tag really don’t mean squat. How your clothes fit and how your body looks and feels are far more telling (and more important, IMO).

  118. thesaurophile says:

    She’s busting out of her clothes because she’s so utterly full of shit.

  119. jacquie109 says:

    Someone who wears a size 6 does not have cankles….. I’m a 16 and I don’t even have them. I know everyones shape is different and age plays a factor but REALLY, quit it already kirstie no one cares but you and you don’t have to lie to us to feel better about yourself!

  120. Ally says:

    Don’t hate on the cankles. I’m 5’3″, and weigh 120, and will always have thick ankles. I try, but they’ll never shrink!

  121. vickie says:

    listen haters and jealous people….she has no stomach…or rolls …or back fat……take a good look….in a dress she could absolutely be wearing a stretchy 6…….maybe not jeans…why other women are ready to attack her is only jealousy…I’m not jealous …I am happy for her….and she is not the lying type…

  122. vickie says:

    what some of you don’t know or understand is she had swollen ankles and black and blue marks all over her…you can see them on one of her interviews……when you are 60 years old ,I guarantee you …you will swell…

  123. Tina Romero says:

    KIRSTIE IS A SIZE 12 KNOW SHE WAS 16 i’M A SIZE 8 AND i’M ALOTE THINER THEN THAT SHE LIES OUT HER BUT AND SHE IS STILL FAT THANK GOD WE DON’T HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT FAT THINK DANCE ANY MORE HER FAT MOVING AS SHE DANCE .

  124. Wonderful paintings! That is the kind of information that are supposed to be shared across the net. Disgrace on Google for not positioning this publish upper! Come on over and visit my web site . Thanks =)

  125. AJ says:

    Erm! She is 60 not 16 give the girl a break, I would be proud of a partner if she looked like Kirsty at 60. Whats wrong with all you negative people? Not everyone has to look anorexic like Madonna, Victoria Beckham or Kate Moss! They should eat food to look as good as Kirsty!

  126. hello!,I really like your writing so much! share we keep in touch more approximately your article on AOL? I need an expert on this house to unravel my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking ahead to look you.

  127. PP64 says:

    If Kirstie is a size 6, then what the hell size is Maksim? A size 2?