Katie Holmes & Suri Cruise party on the Malibu beach, in heels


Here are some new photos of Katie Holmes and Suri, both clad in heels, on the beach in Malibu yesterday. I have no idea where Tom Cruise was, but Katie and Suri were apparently invited to some beach party or something, and Katie tried to introduce her daughter to the ocean. Suri looks kind of scared of the ocean at first, but I think she managed to get close to the surf for a brief moment.

By the way, should we even discuss Katie and Suri’s beach-wear? I realize that they were probably in Malibu for a Hollywood party, but is this standard-issue beach party-wear these days? Katie’s wearing jean shorts, a blazer and spike heels…? You know she was sinking into the sand in those. Meanwhile, Suri is so covered up for a Memorial Day party! Suri wears less clothes in the dead of winter in NYC. Odd. As for Suri’s heels… at this point, I’m not even going to get into it. The little girl loves her heels. She’s a chip of the ol’ lift-wearing-midget block. She really is her daddy’s girl.

Last thing: why is Katie “posing” pigeon-toed for the pap photos??





Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

32 Responses to “Katie Holmes & Suri Cruise party on the Malibu beach, in heels”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. uknowuloveme says:

    She’s standing like that cos she’s running low on battery..better run off to the Stepford repairman katie…we don’t want another situation now do we?

  2. brin says:

    LOL….daddy’s girl (she will tower over him soon like everyone else)!
    At least take the heels off while on the beach!

  3. the original bellaluna says:

    Who wears heels and a blazer to the beach?!? (Unless they’re doing a photo shoot…never mind.)

  4. Quest says:

    Beach sand + heels = LMFAO….really. You gotta be kidding me, it’s like bringing sand to the beach (you just don’t)

  5. You don't say says:

    I am convinced that Suri is the actual mom in this family and Katie is her child. Not sure what Tom is, but they do make an interesting trio.

  6. Elizabeth says:

    Heels and fancy dress – poor Suri never gets to just be a kid @ the beach, having fun, getting dirty and wet. But then CO$ believes children are little adults, so I guess they’re supposed to dress the part.

  7. serena says:

    I think Katie looks great in those photos. The last better photos I’ve seen of her, truly. I like the outfit, it’s very beach-summer like (even if heels in the sand.. well..); and Suri looks cute, I think she cut her hair shorter (it was time!).

  8. Elizabeth says:

    @ quest
    ITA – where’s the half-broken lawn chair to sit in?? the bucket and shovel? how’s a kids supposed to have fun here?!

  9. the original bellaluna says:

    @ Quest – It’s like wearing spike heels to a garden wedding. (Great, if you want to aerate the lawn.)

    @ You don’t say – Tom is the creepy rich uncle who doles out “rewards” for “favours.”

  10. Your mama says:

    Katie looks like she’s wearing Suri’s hat :) funny it looks so small on her head.

  11. tapioca says:

    Oh for the love of Xenu, Katie get yourself some sensible footwear and a hat that fits properly! And it’s a smart jacket with city shorts, or cut-offs with a casual top, not both together. If she weren’t a self-procalimed “designer” I’d let her off, but seriously…

  12. MSat says:

    Can we talk about the hair extensions? And why not just take the spike heels off in the sand?

    Suri is just gorgeous.

  13. Nikkers says:

    Katie needs to get herself a good stylist. She just does not know how to dress herself.

  14. constance says:

    Totally natural looking beach wear. If it’s not barley water, it’s not good enough to bless them. lol overthem.

  15. RHONYC says:

    @ Quest

    you said it! i mean why is she looney, huh? what gives! :-(

  16. anne says:

    Having been a mother to two girly girls I completely understand about the dresses and shoes on Suri. Now Katie – I would think she’d at least take them off and go barefoot – I can imagine that they were up on the sidewalk and Suri took off towards the beach. Nothing wrong with that. Maybe Katie hadn’t had her pedicure that day.

  17. Sue says:

    You know the world has gone mad when national headlines are about Suri wearing heals in the sand. that little girl sure is beautiful. I think that Katie is a good parent.

  18. LunaT says:

    I’m looking forward to the day when Katie is free from this crap. When is her contract w/Tom up? Can’t imagine how suffocating the life is or how many times she’s regretted her choice.

    I have issues w/high heels for little girls. Don’t like it. Along the lines of gstrings for them. Kinda effed.

  19. the original bellaluna says:

    @ LunaT – From what I’ve read, they’re in “renegotiations” if that’s to be believed. Frankly, I doubt she’ll ever be free. If she tries to leave, it’ll be a “Nicole, Bella, Connor” situation all over again: she won’t have custody due to whatever agreement she signed (he certainly does seem adept at preying on young, lesser-known actresses whose careers haven’t yet “taken off,” doesn’t he?) regarding the children and their (pseudo) religious upbringing.

  20. LunaT says:

    @OGBellaluna—my husband thinks my Hollywood conspiracy theories are nutty, but I totally think all of his ladies have had something to gain (a beard, a boost in their career stateside). He also thinks I’m nutty for thinking so many people have had plastice surgery(is it just me or does Angelina look like her under eye bags are smaller and her nose is diff?). Silly husband :) Thank you for believing me, Bellaluna! ;)

  21. Runs with Scissors says:

    re: the pigeon-toed stance:
    that’s what posers do when they’re trying to look “quirky” or “cute.”

    Just like people posing with their legs crossed is supposed to make them look thinner as opposed to say, “stupid” or “insecure.”

    I would love it if I actually bought that she’s having a fun time with her kid, but I just don’t. Katie just makes me a little sad.

  22. meg says:

    Suri has Tom’s nose.

  23. skibunny says:

    LMAO at heels sinking into the sand.

  24. Emese says:

    oh she is an idiot, and so is tom. great couple.. lol

  25. Madisyn says:

    @ bellaluna, I’ve always wondered this and would love your thoughts on the matter.

    Now I still don’t understand the Nicole situation in pertaining to child custody. She was not an unfit mother. I would have thought she would have fought because a judge decides custody, not the CO$. Still baffled.

    What “contract” or “agreement” could Katie possibly sign that would over rule a california judge regarding child custody? No way TinyTom and his minions could possibly claim shes an “unfit mother”. What do you know?

  26. the original bellaluna says:

    @ Madisyn – I think it’s the classic “I’m w-a-y famous; I have TONS of money; you’ll never find another lifestyle like mine; if you want to marry me, sign the damn papers.” (Which is called signing “under duress” and can be contested in a divorce.)

    The thing about the “contract” or “agreement” is this: if no one contests it in a court of law as unfair or “signed under duress” the California court/judge will never know.

    I think Nicole really tried and when it became too much, she was just grateful to get out while she was still sane. Unfortunately, I think she also probably signed some sort of “promisory note” regarding the children (probably witnessed by top-level Xenus) being raised Sci-cos (pronounced “psychos”).

    And with the way Tiny Tom left her (pregnant; bad-mouthing her like she betrayed him in some way) she probably didn’t want any further embarrassment or contact with him.

    I don’t know any church would want to essentially lobotomise their women (wait – yes I do! CONTROL!) but the Sci-cos must have some serious stuff on people who want to leave. Otherwise, we’d know more…

  27. Madisyn says:

    @ bellaluna

    I agree with everything you said. Nevertheless, I still don’t understand what “agreement” could override a CA judge regarding child custody if the mother is a fit parent.

    Also, don’t know what kind of prenup Katie signed but by the end of 10 years with TinyTom, Nicole had more than enough money to fight for some kind of custody. I know she probaby had to go to CO$ classes where you confess your every sin, but I would have thrown it right back at him and threatened him as well. Not to mention, he came out of that divorce looking like the control freak, CO$ nut he is.

    There has to be a CA lawyer who would love to take on the CO$ and make a name for themselves. I know I’d be petrified of them but I’m a big chicken, there has to be someone TinyTom couldn’t pay off.

    What could TinyTom have on Nicole that Nicole does not have on TinyTom?

  28. Sue says:

    Take the heels off the kid so she can really play, if she took off for the beach stop her and take of the shoes.

  29. the original bellaluna says:

    @ Madisyn – Okay, this is what I think:

    The Sci-co and Nic probably already had an “agreement” in place. If that was the case, in Cali at least, a judge wouldn’t have any say in the fitness of a parent or a custody arrangement UNLESS one of the two contests the custody agreement. FCS (Family Court Services) only gets involved when a judge orders it. If custody/visitation is “agreed upon” prior to the divorce being finalised, no need for FCS or a judge to ever say a word (except to ask both parties if they agree and then enter said agreement into order).

    And trust me, they are the LAST bunch of booger-heads you would ever want involved in the decision of who gets your kids, and when. When I had to go to FCS for my oldest (his father nearly killed me on more than one occasion and I had a restraining order against him to boot) they actually had the audacity to tell me:
    “We usually give custody to the more cooperative parent.” This, for a 7 month old who ONLY nursed. No bottles, no food. (Baby’s choice, not mine.)

    Yeah, I’m sure there are lots of lawyers chomping at the bit to take on CO$. I’d love to see it, in fact. But the cold stark reality is CO$ is a money-driven, celeb-driven machine hidden under the guise of religion, and I doubt it’ll happen any time soon.

    (You know I was being sarcastic about the “be nice” on the Linnocent thread, yeah?) ;)

  30. Emily says:

    I actually like Katie’s outfit. It’s completely ridiculous to wear to the beach of course, but for a casual lunch at a cafe it’d work.

    Now, about the heels at the beach-people need to stop. It reminds me too much of Paris Hilton.

  31. Charlotte says:

    Why would you wear those on the beach? The heel would obviously sink in the sand, and you’d be risking a sprained ankle. I don’t mean to be critical, but her legs are rather stumpy looking.

  32. Dee says:

    Katie = Idiot
    Suri = Troubles, soon enough!