“Mark Sanchez is hot for ‘experienced’ Jennifer Aniston” links

gq1

Mark Sanchez is hot for “experienced” Jennifer Aniston. [Celebuzz]
Jessica Biel looks really, really skinny all of a sudden. [LaineyGossip]
Briefcase model knows how to fight back, it seems. [Dlisted]
Sarah Palin has too much time on her hands if this is her pedicure. [Gawker]
There‘s going to be an Austin Powers 4. Ugh. [Pajiba]
Candice Swanepoel in a bikini. Still really skinny. [The Blemish]
George Clooney is in Lake Como, without a girl it seems. [Pop Sugar]
Heidi Klum is topless in Sardinia. [Yeeeah]
Charlie Sheen and the Juggalos. I can‘t even start. [Evil Beet]
More photos from the budget Do Something Awards. [Jezebel]
Daniel Craig, his wife and her kid. So cute. [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
Leighton Meester, de-banged and pretty. [Celebslam]
Does anyone care about Andy Roddick at this point? No? [OMG Blog]
Bloody, bloody Linnocent. [LimeLife]
I still don‘t understand what an Aubrey O‘Day actually is. [Moe Jackson]
Selena Gomez‘s boobs are bigger. [Amy Grindhouse]
LeAnn Rimes‘s lopsided bolt-ons, Tinkerbell wings. Tragic. [Seriously? OMG! WTF?]

wenn5693324

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

47 Responses to ““Mark Sanchez is hot for ‘experienced’ Jennifer Aniston” links”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. DreamyK says:

    Candice in a bikini is stunning. Good for her.

  2. brin says:

    Everyone clap your hands if you want Leann to go away.

  3. That's Interesting says:

    He’s adorable, but the shirt’s a bit tight there Mark. If his a$$ is that tight I will bring myself to forgive him.

  4. Firecracker says:

    Wow, he is hot! I love men with that coloring…reminds me of a young Richard Grieco, if anyone remembers who he is, lol.

  5. jc126 says:

    Mark Sanchez is also hot for 17 year old girls. This is established fact, not a rumor.
    And his coach is a foot fetishist whose wife has appeared on creepy internet videos. This is also established fact.

  6. Firecracker says:

    Holy moly, that pic of Liho is creepy beyond belief because I believe she’d be capable of that and get away with it.

  7. Unstoppable says:

    GQ. Part owned by one of the Huvane brothers. Hmmm Desperate Huvaniston couldn’t make this piece more obvious and transparent if they tried. And yes, ‘experienced’ is something Aniston most definitely is, given that she’s gone through half of Hollywood. A Sausage and a hallway. That would define Mark’s ‘experience’ being with Aniston.

  8. Cherry Rose says:

    While Aniston might be experienced in bed, emotionally, it seems she has the experience of a high school girl.

    Not to mention Mark would probably roll over in Jennifer’s bed and see her publicist, Huvane, laying right beside him, furiously typing out a story to the tabloids on his smart phone.

    And great, I just grossed myself out.

  9. georgiagrl says:

    JC126
    Damn
    Guy had a fling with a 17 year old who looked much older, and was in clubs with her mom. BTW, legal in NY and so what if the coach has a foot fetish with his WIFE! Talk about high and mighty!

  10. gaby says:

    he is a cutey I just don’t know why they had to make him look like Fez from that 70’s show

  11. Rita says:

    @DreamyK- Candice has put a few pounds back on her thighs since those really skinny photos. Right now I think her body is as close to perfect as one can get. Boob size is a matter of taste but I think for a man, Candice looks pretty tastey.

    @brin- I bet you look like Candice in a bikini. Anyway, WTF. LeAnn got her bat wings to go with the batshit. Was there and explaination for the pic or was it just the bottom of the stupid barrel?

  12. Wilz says:

    He’s cute, but I HATE it when guys smile like that on purpose with their tongues peeking through their teeth. Makes me a little homicidal.

  13. smith says:

    Dear Huvane;

    By “experienced” does Mark mean, “old?” Oopsie on your part.

    Love,
    Me

  14. gee says:

    @JC126 he was like 20 or something at the time, and 17 is legal in ny. I don’t see the big deal?

    PLUS – go Jets!

  15. Firecracker says:

    Wilz, I didn’t notice the tongue thing. Eww.

  16. brin says:

    @Rita…Hey girl….I’m Candice’s twin!
    The reason for the Tinkerbell pose:Eddie and bonus mom took the boys to see “Peter Pan”.
    I see her more as the crocodile.

  17. Mia says:

    He won me over when he spoke about going to the Tonys last year. A man who loves theatre, is a man after my own heart. Stay away from Aniston, though!

  18. That's Interesting says:

    What is it with everyone’s Huvane obsession?

    I know you ladies hate the fact that Mark Sanchez and Brad Pitt would never, ever give you the time of day, but seriously, let it go already. Not everything in life is a PR conspiracy.

    Seriously, you think the Huvane’s have some sort of mind control device that just prompted Mark Sanchez to talk about Aniston out of the blue? Oh, nevermind, some of you probably do believe that.

    Like the time you though the timing of Aniston’s dog dying was suspicious. LOL.

  19. smith says:

    Dear That’s Interesting;

    Aniston’s pet wasn’t real. That was Huvane in a dog suit.

    Love,
    A NY Publicist
    Woof.

  20. Rhiley says:

    You know Jennifer Anniston will be on top of Mark Sanchez by Christmas, if she hasn’t been already.

  21. That's Interesting says:

    @unstoppable. No actually, you’re just kinda crazy.

    Don’t get me wrong. Publicists do a lot of things for their clients, but you seem to think that EVERY moment of Jennifer Aniston’s life is some sort of PR concoction, even when someone who doesn’t even know her mentions her briefly in an interview.

    Somehow Huvane is to blame for the fact that Celebitchy CHOOSES to write about Aniston EVERY day. And Huvane somehow forces you against your will to comment about Aniston every day, which btw, is why the media keeps writing about her. If you guys would just stop clicking she’d go away. That’s not on Huvane, that’s on you.

    If you’re going to obsess over PR people, why limit yourself to Huvane? Let’s talk about Stan Rosenfield, George Clooney’s PR guy who never leaves his client’s side, unless he’s busy calling People Magazine, first to turn Clooney’s last girlfriend into some kind of acceptable actress/model and then to paint her as a needy T.W.A.T.

    Who reps Reese Witherspoon? Because that guy is worth every cent he is paid. We just got an entire, hour by hour run down of her European honeymoon, complete with photos, insider quotes, and what they ate for breakfast lunch and dinner. All of this after Reese gets married, complete with People Magazine approved photos, just weeks before her last film comes out.

    Trust me, I’m not naive, but why just obsess over Aniston’s PR guy? Let’s talk about all of them.

  22. Firecracker says:

    That’s Interesting,
    I agree with you. Not every minute is for PR, unless of course your name ends with Kardashian. Her doggy was real! Aniston’s I mean.

  23. dread pirate cuervo says:

    His watch matches his sweater? Pass. The Dirty Sanchez does nothing for me.

  24. Penguen says:

    @ Brin:

    I’d reply to your comment, but I’m too busy furiously clapping my hands.

    🙂

  25. That's Interesting says:

    @unstoppable. I never said Aniston was some innocent goody-goody. She plays the game, but here is the important part, she plays the game, like EVERYONE ELSE. All of these publicists and the stars themselves do everything you accuse Huvane of doing exclusively.

    Angelina used to call US Weekly and tell them what park she and Maddox would be playing in and in exchange she wanted them to mention her charity work, you know, because she’s so selfless. My point is they ALL play the game, even people who pretend not to have publicists.

    And basing your “he’s been outed, it’s a topic of infamy” research on comments you have seen in the comments section of celebrity websites is not research.

  26. shay kay says:

    So basically he could conceivably be into anyone except JA because:
    a. no one is into JA
    b. JA does not have an excellent body
    c. JA is stick thin with no curves
    d. you just don’t like JA

    I’ll let you figure this one out.

  27. brin says:

    @Penguen…lol, me too!

  28. jc126 says:

    Didn’t say 17 wasn’t legal, did I? Just noting that NY Jets QB Sanchez likes 17 year olds, and that his coach is a foot fetishist who videotapes his wife and puts her online. Just stating the facts.

  29. eternalcanadian says:

    I guess we’ll never see the day when a pro sport player like Mark says he’s got the hots for an older guy like George Clooney? 😉

  30. Runs with Scissors says:

    @That’s Interesting: “Angelina used to call US Weekly and tell them what park she and Maddox would be playing in and in exchange she wanted them to mention her charity work…”

    Wow, where did you pull this out of (hint: your ass) where’s the link to prove this?

    (Jolie and Pitt fired their publicists years ago.) And basing your “Jolie called the paps in exchange for mentioning her charity work” research on comments you have seen in the comments section of celebrity websites is not research, lol.

    Aniston and her handlers have been called out numerous times for planting false stories, denying them, and on and on. She’s a joke and doesn’t take a crap without Huvane issuing a carefully worded press release.

    Here’s just one link mentioning how sick everyone is of being manipulated by Aniston and Huvane:

    http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/43209298.html

    I’m with unstoppable, you’re just trying desperately to spin it how you WANT to, facts be damned.

  31. maggie says:

    of course he wants someone with experience he only bangs teenagers

  32. Cherry Rose**LOL!!

  33. That's Interesting says:

    @running with scissors and Unstoppable.

    Here’s the Big New York Times piece on Angelina’s media manipulation, which discusses her use of Maddox in exchange for mentioning her charity work.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html

    And I know the loons want to claim this article was discredited but it wasn’t. Another writer at the Times disagreed with the article, which is not the same as being discredited. Wishing it was discredited won’t make it so.

    Also, her PR guy is some dude named Kosinski. A smart PR guy who gave himself another name so his client can say she doesn’t have a PR guy. Instead, she has advisers.

    You’d have to be a naive moron to think she doesn’t have media representatives or that she’s never manipulated the media. Even Mother Theresa used to manipulate the media. ALL, and I do mean ALL, public figures manipulate the media.

  34. That’s Interesting**How could you go there with Mother Theresa!!Shame,Shame on you!!Its past your bedtime-Goodnight.

  35. Zara says:

    @ That’s Interesting “Also, her PR guy is some dude named Kosinski. A smart PR guy who gave himself another name so his client can say she doesn’t have a PR guy. Instead, she has advisers.

    You moron, Geyer Kosinski is her long time MANAGER. His management company is called Media Talent Group. Nicole Kidman has also sought his services as a MANAGER. Get your head out of Aniston’s ass and breath some fresh air, you might learn something.

  36. Runs with Scissors says:

    @zara, lol, yep, that was just one little detail that ‘That’s Interesting’ decided to try to spin into oblivion. The other detail is an entire article debunking the whole thing.

    “And I know the loons want to claim this article was discredited but it wasn’t. Another writer at the Times disagreed with the article, which is not the same as being discredited. Wishing it was discredited won’t make it so.”

    Yeah, and that’s EXACTLY what a “manipulator” would say to try to convince you they weren’t full of shit. Sorry, but wishing it WASN’T discredited won’t make it so. It absolutely WAS.

    Here’s a link to the article directly REFUTING the “facts”:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/opinion/07pubed.html?pagewanted=1&sq&st=nyt&scp=15

    From the article:

    “In the case of the Jolie article, it is the most fundamental question in journalism: Are all the facts right?”

    “There was never any conversation about positive coverage,” Hackett said. “There was never any conversation about a future plan.” Liebman said Hackett’s version was correct.

    Kosinski said that The Times’s description of what Jolie was asking for was “simply not true.” Klein said People was “free to write what they wanted” and to “do the layout they wanted.”

    “I have read the seven-page contract for the photos and interview. It made no mention of positive coverage, an editorial plan, a road map for a layout or any other editorial conditions…”

    @HorsePoor Hanna: lol! 🙂 I’m fine with hypocritical people hilariously calling others “loons” and “naive morons” while refusing to see their own moronic lunacy, but bashing Mother Teresa of all people? –Ok, so the plastic surgery (knee lift) and the high heels (stiletto) she insisted on wearing under her nun’s habit were a bit off putting– but really, how DARE anyone call her a manipulator! (Especially another manipulator!)

  37. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    Zara, That’s Interesting knows that, she just wants those with LESS knowledge than her to fall for it.

    Problem is she is running out of those kinds of adults with LESS knowledge, all that left is little kids who could care less about Aniston. So, this SPIN,SPIN,SPIN is to deflect.

    A Publicist, is going to allow Jolie to call him Manager instead, for her ENTIRE career? In what real world do professional people who WORK for their Title allow ONLY 1 person to change it to whatever they deem appropiate as a COVER.

    Unreal, no adult with basic common sense would believe that. So, I am left to beleive she knows better, but has run out of excuses and is now preying on the weak. Like someone puts any weight behind that NYTIMES mess. Sources people. Names, dates and facts all of which US Weekly failed to provide.

  38. Nev says:

    Omg I burst out laughing at this. Really, how surprising another person under the same pr banner. Aniston can’t seem to take a dump without this Huvane agency holding her hand. Why can’t Aniston think outside of the pr box one day. How desperate can one person.

  39. siska says:

    @thats interesting..thank you for your fair comment..you are right..most star used media tactic to sell their profile..but..its useless to argue with die hard JA hater or AJ fans..they will always assume badly about jen and never think AJ did anything wrong..and they will spend their time and effort to discredit JA..when they said JA is no one that made them care..
    If they said that every single person who said highly of jen is HUvane paid team..they should also accept that about their idol..but unfortunately..they will not did that..
    so its really no use to argue with them..it just show their lack of judgement..

  40. siska says:

    @Zara, manager or pr..their job to make their idol still famous..cause that made them still sellable..so what is the different?..its just different title but the job is same..to make their image sellable..by doing photo op,interview, and a bit drop of juicy rumour sometime.
    Thats why..the stars went out and about to gather exposure..eitherby themself or using their family,partner etc in holiday,night out,day shopping etc situation..its their job..
    and sometime there are help from their own peer to name drop..it help..or if they not so famous yet like this man..he might name dropping another famous name so his story get pick up more..in this case he pick JA..who is one of the most famous single woman..

  41. Eve says:

    @ Wilz:

    …I HATE it when guys smile like that on purpose with their tongues peeking through their teeth. Makes me a little homicidal.

    I hate that too! Also, I hate when Reese Witherspoon does this thing with her tongue every time she smiles while trying to look cute, it’s like she bites her tongue a little. Argh!

    @ Cherry Rose:

    LOL!

    @ Runs with Scissors:

    I’m hugging you from behind right now 🙂 .

  42. That's Interesting says:

    WOW, the JA haters really are crazy. You claim she;s irrelevant and then you spend the entire afternoon and evening obsessing over her, trying to discredit even things she has nothing to do with.

    So Angie call her adviser her manager, so what? He’s still helping her with her publicity machine. Anyway, it’s no use arguing with you. The reality is you create your own reality.

    Angie is the purest, most selfless, least manipulative person who ever lived and she would never lie about anything to anyone for any reason because she really is soooo much better than Mother Theresa. Angie generates all of this publicity through no effort of her own or anyone who works for her. If that’s what you think, so be it.

  43. Runs with Scissors says:

    @That’s Intersting: “WOW, the JA haters really are crazy. You claim she;s irrelevant and then you spend the entire afternoon and evening obsessing over her…”

    You’re projecting again. (It might save time if you just scream “loons” and “crazy” and “obsessive” and “naive moron” directly into a mirror). YOU might have spent the entire afternoon and evening obsessing over AJ and building your “case” based on easily refuted “research” but I didn’t. Took about 5 minutes to tuck you in after HorsePoor Hanna put you to bed.

    @Eve: I’m happily accepting your hug from behind and giving you a friendly ass pat (from in front) Just call me Jeremy Irons 🙂

  44. Eve says:

    @ Runs with Scissors:

    @Eve: I’m happily accepting your hug from behind and giving you a friendly ass pat (from in front) Just call me Jeremy Irons.

    LOL! I’ll let you do that — will call you just Runs though. But that’s just because I love your comments on here.

    P.S.: (this actually happened): I once saw a good friend of mine while she was about to cross a footbridge but she hadn’t seen me so I patted her ass (naughtily) and waited for her reaction…her eyes were on fire as she turned to whoever DARED to do that. Upon seeing me laughing at her she relaxed a little and then told me I had just escaped being punched in the face. And she used be a judo wrestler (during her highschool years).

  45. Runs with Scissors says:

    @Eve, ha! Awesome, sounds like you narrowly escaped a busted nose! I actually wish more people would react like that. I tend to think none of us should be “worth our salt” in that regard. Thanks for accepting my friendly pat on the ass without the nose smack 🙂

  46. Eve says:

    @ Runs with Scissors:

    Actually, Brazilians are a lot more “flexible” (so to speak) when it comes to ass slapping/patting. I say often we’re “The Ass People” because, just like Americans are obsessed with boobs, we’re obsessed with the ass. So, it’s normal to pat a friend’s ass…a close friend, I mean. It’s also sexy when it’s a couple (I don’t even mind if it’s in public) but the way I understood Mr. Irons, he seems to think we should accept a pat on the butt even from someone who isn’t close to us, so no…that deserves a slap in the face back (or a lawsuit).

    By the way, I think I escaped more than just a busted nose — she was really strong.

  47. Sydney says:

    I like this website very much so much excellent information.