Channing Tatum has always proudly owned his former male stripper status, and now many of his (joyously sketchy) experiences have been folded into the upcoming Magic Mike movie by director Steven Soderbergh. Certainly, the trailer and its red-band counterpart look quite promising, but not all is well in the Magic Mike universe. Channing’s former stripper buddies are coming out of the woodwork to protest that the movie steals their moves and its titular nickname as well. TMZ has a photo of them all together, and Channing looks exactly the same as he does now; as for the rest of them … let’s just thank goodness for Hollywood casting. Are these dudes just trying to ruin a good time for da ladies, or do they have a point?
Two ex-male strippers who once worked with Channing Tatum claim his new movie Magic Mike is a giant SLAP IN THE FACE … claiming the actor stole THEIR stories and turned it into his own Hollywood gold.
FYI — Tatum doesn’t just star in the film, he’s also a producer — and has claimed the film is partially based on his real-life experiences as a dancer back in Florida.
But TMZ spoke to Thomas “Awesome” Austin and London Steele — both guys worked with Tatum back in his FL stripper days — who say the film is based more off their lives than his … even down to the title — Magic Mike — which is a name Austin says he coined for another dancer.
“Awesome” Austin tells TMZ … he and his former male dance buddies are a like a “brotherhood” and, while they’re happy for Channing’s success, they feel betrayed by the actor for not involving any of them in the film.
They claim they took Tatum under their wings when he was a nobody and taught him all their special stripper-moves like “The Hot Seat” — which is featured in the film and Austin says he invented it.
The guys tell us, after seeing parts of the final product they feel slighted … claiming Tatum failed to consult them for accuracy and insist that, without them, he wouldn’t have any material.
Austin explains, Channing was an “amateur” when he met him and says “he only danced for 4 months. How many events could have happened to him?”
A rep for Channing had no comment.
[From TMZ]
This is a tricky situation because, while choreographed dance moves are indeed protected by copyright law, these dudes would have to register their “moves” before asking a court for relief, and I doubt they’ve sent videotapes of their routines to the Library of Congress to make things official in terms of U.S. copyright law. Can you imagine? And they’d have to trademark any nicknames as well before asking for monetary damages. So until there’s an actual lawsuit (which there probably won’t be), I’m going to assume that these guys either want some “shut up” money or are looking for publicity for their current stripping endeavors. On that last note, I can’t blame them for trying.
Photos courtesy of AllMoviePhoto and EW.com
Uncool, Magic Mike.
I hate legalese stories…but I am surprisingly sympathetic toward the other guys.
I am pro-Channing for making a movie based on any story he came up with, that is hard enough to do, period, in Hollywood.
But if they are someone else’s stories, and I do this myself all the time when I am writing a story, I incorporate bits and pieces of my own and anyone else’s stories that will make a, well, Good Story, at least give credit somehow, where it is due, throw the boys a bone, no matter how douchey they look in that photo…
hell, who cares-I’m not going to see the movie for the storyline anyway..
LMAO!!! +1
Exactly, thank you +2
Isn’t that the truth! +3!!!! 😉
Amen!!!
I mean really…do guys go to Hooters for the wings?
ROFL… thank you for my daily chuckle. And, good point too! I’m planning on going with a bunch of my friends, and we will probably be tempted to toss dollar bills like confetti, because it just seems like the thing to do here, you know? Talk about Women Behaving Badly… if you hear a news story after this movie opens about a bunch of rowdy women kicked out of the theatre during a screening of Magic Mike, well, you know who to thank for it!
Exactly what I was thinking!!
And, how many male stripper moves can there be?
there’s a storyline?
Exactly!
+ ManyMany
Dancing naked isn’t copyrighted. “Based On” doesn’t mean “Verbatim”. They want some quick cash. Channing seems like a really nice, honest guy.
Yep. This movie should provide some delicious fodder for fantasy time 😉
Because I am sure there is only one stripper with the nickname “Magic Mike” in the whole world. And honestly, how many dance moves can there be?
Exactly.
Also, according to that link “choreography” can be covered by copyright. A few “moves?” No.
If Tatum took their complete routines for the movie, then they’d have a point.
Other than that, *ALL* choreography takes inspiration from somewhere.
And getting bent out of shape over the name “Magic Mike?” It’s not that original . . . get over it.
Ummm, doesn’t the fact that CT danced with them make them “his moves” too?
Maybe a couple of them are out of shape and looking for a quick payout. Seriously, dudes, it’s STRIPPING; not exactly Tony-winning choreography.
Agreed Bella.
Besides how about they try supporting him..
Agreed Bella.
Besides how about they try supporting him..instead of suing him. And some of those guys are seriously douchey looking
My entire dream last night was that I was an extra in that movie- one of the lucky ladies being entertained. It was the best dream I have ever had. I am all about Matt Bromer.
I’m really sad that I can’t watch the red-band trailer on my phone. *sigh*
I don’t think this situation is tricky at all… these guys have no grounds for a case, so they must be looking for some publicity.
Unfortunate. They probably could have gotten the same… er, exposure if they had just come forward in a more supportive, positive way. Instead they sound like jealous douchebags.
+1!! Can you imagine all the performance bookings they’d get if they had been more supportive? Like, “Hey, ladies! Check out the real men of Magic Mike! No need to see it on screen when you can touch it in person!” Is that too gross? It’s a little much, right? Sorry. I’m tired and have had WAY too much caffeine…
HAHAHAHAHAAHAA! I love this comment. And you are right by the way, except I could see some people trying to advertise their show this way and then the MOVIE PEOPLE sue THEM. How wrong would that be?
Just as songwriters are told to “write what they know,” Channing wrote about what he knew (and, mmmmmm, thank goodness).
Now had the dancers he initially worked with “covered their ass” by going through the proper legal channels, then I might feel some emphathy.
Just sounds to me like it’s mostly sour grapes.
Magic Mike is based on his life but he doesn’t play himself in the movie, Alex plays the character based on him and he plays one of the more experienced strippers.
*they feel betrayed by the actor for not involving any of them in the film.*
Enough said. Seems to me they wanted to be in the film. HAHAHAH.
Got to say I don’t get the love for Tatum. Don’t think he’s sexy. And, frankly every movie of his I’ve ever seen he’s been horrible. Since it’s obvious his draw is supposed to be his looks…for me, he’s just meh!
Maybe his dong-candy will convert you! (And if not, I’ll gladly take your piece…mmmmmmm)
This sounds as dumb as Adele’s ex boyfriend suing her because he “inspired” her lyrics by breaking her heart. People take their life experiences and turn them into art, that’s how it works!!!
Yes, unless they’ve registered their moves or name, they’re just looking for PR and a check. I think if once he had gotten famous, then denied his stripping days, it would be a bigger slap in the face so not sure why this bugs them. This is supposed to be a fun movie and Channing is not claiming its anything other than what it is – Oscar worthy! j/k but really, I bet it’s better than Titanic.
I haven’t seen the movie yet but I think it should get an Oscar
Come on! I may be wrong but, of course you haven’t seen the movie yet it doesn’t come out till July 11, 2012… Just saying!