Was Mick Jagger obsessed with ‘hypnotic’ Angelina Jolie for years?

A few years ago, a couple of hacks wrote a few books about Angelina Jolie and her crazy sex life. Most of it read like either “The Villainess Jolie Attacks Men” OR “Angelina boned whoever she felt like boning.” One of my favorites of her alleged lovers was Ralph Fiennes – several “sources” claimed that Angelina and Ralph had some kind of torrid booty call situation circa 2004. Another favorite? Some people claimed that Angelina and Mick Jagger had an affair circa 1997 (when he was married to Jerry Hall) and then again in 2004 (when Angelina was allegedly juggling Ralph, Jonny Lee Miller, Colin Farrell and Brad Pitt). On the whole, I’ve always believed that Angelina was sleeping with Jonny Lee Miller for years after their divorce – and I always found the idea of it hot (mostly because I think JLM is beautiful). I don’t think she boned Ralph, but I enjoy the fan-fiction of that story. As for Mick… well… I can see how Angelina would be his type. But I can’t see Angelina falling for it. But! Radar has a story about a new “tell-all” book about Mick Jagger, and this book claims Mick was obsessed with Angelina for years. Hm.

The hypnotic effect Angelina Jolie has on men is well documented but the fact that she drove one of rock’s most notorious lady killers, Mick Jagger, to obsession and had him “virtually sobbing” over her is now being exposed in a new book.

Christopher Andersen reveals that the Rolling Stones frontman would constantly bombard Jolie with calls begging to see her and it was all encouraged by her mother Marcheline Bertrand.

Jagger fell for Jolie when she played a stripper in one of the band’s music videos in 1997 and despite being married at the time to Jonny Lee Miller and having an affair with her Playing God co-star Timothy Hutton, Bertrand “loved Mick for Angie… and felt that he could teach her about fame,” the late actress’s friend Lauren Taines says in the book.

In excerpts of MICK: The Wild Life and Mad Genius of Jagger printed in The New York Daily News, the pouty-lipped singer went after Angelina hard and was infatuated by her wild side even admitting that, “She scares me a little. I like that.”

At the time Angelina “used hard drugs, had a fondness for S&M and was a self-confessed cutter.”

The tome reveals that the brunette beauty initially refused to return Mick’s calls which did little to deter him and only served to make him pursue her more.

“Angelina, it’s Mick. Will you please, please call me?” “Miss Jolie, why aren’t you returning my calls?” “Angelina, I have got to speak to you. Call me,” were some of the incredibly desperate message left.

The cat and mouse game continued between them for several years and Taines added that she was amazed at how Jolie was “messing with Mick’s head” and he was “virtually sobbing” on the phone trying to get her to spend time with him.

Even when Mick was ending his marriage with Jerry Hall in 1999, he was still in hot pursuit of the now mother-of-six, and presented her with a $5,000 pair of earrings. The book alleges that by this stage Angelina was juggling Tim Hutton, future hubbie Billy Bob Thornton, Nicolas Cage and Russell Crowe.

[From Radar]

In 1999 she was boning BBT, Timothy Hutton, Nick Cage AND Russell Crowe? Good God! If Angelina managed to get with Russell Crowe circa 1999, that righteous bitch gets another slow-clap from me. 1999 Crowe = The Hottest He’s Ever Been. I would love to think that Angelina hit it and quit it like a good girl. Anyway… as for the Mick rumors… I don’t know. It could have happened. Considering it’s coming from the Jagger side of things, I think it might be slightly more plausible. But the 1999 version of Angelina was kind of rough – she was still using pretty heavily back then, and she didn’t really get clean until the next year. Do you think more of Angelina for not returning Mick’s calls? I kind of do.

More photos of Angelina and the kids in Sarajevo over the weekend:

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

142 Responses to “Was Mick Jagger obsessed with ‘hypnotic’ Angelina Jolie for years?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. lower-case deb says:

    cut a swath, girl! cut a swath!

  2. spitfire says:

    You rock, Ms Jolie!

  3. Cherry says:

    Isn’t this a really old story? Who cares, at this point?
    BTW, I think the detail about Angelina’s mom is the most shocking part. ‘Bertrand “loved Mick for Angie… and felt that he could teach her about fame,”’?? I hope that’s BS. What kind of mother wants her 23-yo (married!) daughter to hook up with a (married!) man who’s old enough to be her father?

    • k says:

      I get the feeling that Marcheline was no saint. I remember reading about how she allowed Angie to collect/play with knives as a girl.

  4. lisa2 says:

    LOL.. it’s funny how people have made Angie’s sex life some Urban Legion. Thing is other celebs have had way more public associations. Other than her 2 marriages and her relationship with Jenny S. There have never been any actual pictures of her with anyone. Just rumor and speculations. And there were not pictures or anything of her with Brad before they were seen on the beach. So maybe fiction is more interesting then Fact. I recall Mick making a cute comment about her and Brad and kiddies at the BAFTA awards in 2010 I think.. and then all of them going out to dinner with Clint. So doubt any of this is true.

    the thing I find disgusting is using her Mother in the story when she is dead and not able to answer the charges they place on her. Sad that. But I call BS.. I’m sure her detractors will be all over this. Even without proof..

    but hey it is what is always done with her.

    LOL.. her nose looks the same now as then too.

    • beyonce's bump says:

      I agree! and with the exception of Jenny S, she has been in pretty long term relationships with her partners. And even if she kept sleeping with JLM, a lot of people sleep with their ex-es, even after the relationship is over. I can dig that she could be very open sexually, but I do not believe she is this sexual conquerer and queen of Sheba, she has been made out to be. *sips tea*

    • Cherry says:

      I think you’re right, I never quite got why AJ is always pictured as some kind of sexual predator. Rumors aside, it really doesn’t look like she’s been with that many men. What’s more, has she ever even confirmed this relationship with ‘Jenny S’? Are there any photos of them together? It’s said that AJ is bisexual because of this alledged relationship, right? Has she ever commented on it herself? I’m just wonderin’.

      • hyena says:

        As a long time AJ fan, it was pretty well known they did it during the filming of the music video and then she cut his old ass off.

        She has the sexual prowess image because she used to constantly talk about sex in interviews- trysts in hotels, “we just did it in the car”, “I can’t wait to get into Bed with Brad” and I loved it.

        She’s so boring now and needs to eat! I love her charitable and mom side but she is hiding behind a sack. It’s crazy that she looks thinner now, than in the main pic here where she was a straight up addict.

      • nofkksgiven says:

        “I would probably have married Jenny if I hadn’t married my husband. I fell in love with her the first second I saw her.

        and in 2003, asked if she was bisexual, Jolie responded, “Of course. If I fell in love with a woman tomorrow, would I feel that it’s okay to want to kiss and touch her? If I fell in love with her? Absolutely! Yes!

      • Toot says:


        That quote about the car was said by BBT not Angelina.

    • Linda says:

      hyena, how do you know Angie is an addict? A lot of celebs (including the so called good ones) do drug but it doesn’t mean they are addict. I tried to smoke several times when I was a teenager just to be cool but thank god I didn’t like it. Does this mean I was an addict? I’m not saying Angie didn’t do drug but that was probably just to experience it. Not like Amy Winhouse or Kate Moss.

      • Red Granny says:

        Angelina is pretty open about her abusing drugs in the past.

      • Sal says:

        Red Granny, she NEVER said she ‘abused’ drugs. She said she TRIED every drug out there. Ie SAMPLED. There is a big difference. At no stage does that mean abuse or addiction. There wouldn’t be a single Hollywood celeb that hasn’t.

      • Vesper says:

        During an interview with Barbara Walters they spoke about her heroin “habit”. Google it.

    • Red Granny says:

      Yes, the past about the mother sounds horrible. But I believe everything is made up anyway, so it doesn´t really matter.

      Also: Her nose looks the same to me too.

  5. MashMash says:

    This entire Mick Jagger thing was also in Andrew Morton’s book on Angie. Just saying.

  6. Sombrero says:

    There’s a blind that most people guest as them. It said they have a kid together


    • mln76 says:

      Ah I was waiting for a gullible person to bring that idiotic blind up. Georgia Jagger is a true combination of Mick and Jerry its sort of hilarious and Jerry did a mag cover breastfeeding her son. I’ve a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell ya though ;)

      • Sombrero says:

        Did i say that i trust that blind ? Nope. In fact i highly doubt it.
        I just bring up that blind just in case someone want to know about it.

        So gullible i am certainly not. :)

      • Tiegs says:

        Jerri was actually breast-feeding her son Gabriel, and it seems a little silly to call someone ‘gullible’ for simply mentioning a blind item. She didn’t say she believed it, did she?

      • mln76 says:

        I’ve been trying so hard not to offend anyone lately OH WELL…if you yourself admit the blind is pretty obviously BS don’t you think if you had mentioned that in your original comment you would have avoided the ‘gullible’ moniker ;) also i just don’t get the point of spreading that kind of hurtful rumor about a child’s paternity when you yourself don’t believe it .

      • Sombrero says:

        Not offended here, like tiegs i just think it’s silly to think that someone is gullible for mentioning a blind item.
        No, i don’t think the blind is obviously BS, i said i highly doubt it, see the difference ? And i just tried to bring the blind into discussion, so what’s hurtful from that ?
        But hey if someone mention blind item and try to bring up previous rumor in a comment can be classified as gullible, then , every single commenter in gossip column must be gullible

      • freeda says:

        Great, another uber fan who thinks she actually knows the object of her adoration. None of us knows whether this is true or not, plenty of women have accidental pregnancies. There’s no need to jump down someone’s throat. Calling someone gullible because their speculations don’t match yours is incredibly childish.

      • mln76 says:

        Oh please the blogger who fabricated this blind doesn’t even bother to post anymore and was known to make up gossip to get hits on his failed blog. Of the two children of Jagger/Halls this could be one is the near spitting image of Jerry Hall with her beautiful thick glossy blonde hair and Jagger’s face. The other was featured on a cover getting breast fed by Hall as a baby. In this case it’s obviously not a reputable blind, not from a reputable source. Pointing out that the source is spurious isn’t claiming that Angelina is a saint or that I know her just that the particular blind in question is hogwash.
        People are so eager to believe the worst of Angelina that they are willing to eat S–t to do it.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        @ Freeda-In one breath you call someone out for using the term “gullible” and then in the next breath call that commenter “childish”? LOL! Really, be a bit MORE hypocritical…

      • NM6804 says:

        Blindgossip is still writing blind items and if you click the tab “solved” it seems like some do hold some truth.

        If you are refering to CDAN (who didn’t write the blind), then he also is still writing articles and blinds as we speak.

        Jolie carrying a rockstar baby wouldn’t be all that earth shattering. Many things have happened in HW that have been kept secret and will continue to do so. That is not to say that I believe this particular blind.

      • Tiegs says:

        @mln, firstly, Blind Gossip is a perfectly legitimate gossip site, which Celebitchy itself sometimes links to, and it’s hardly “a failed blog” just because you don’t agree with a post.

        Secondly, I’ve seen you previously commenting on stories which originated there, about other actresses and even, ironically, one about January Jones babydaddy, so get off you high horse about “hurtful rumour(s) about a child’s paternity”. It’s beyond hypocritical.

        Thirdly, again, that was NOT Georgia being breastfed on the magazine cover. It was her brother Gabriel. The blind sounds like a crazy, soap opera storyline, but then so does a lot of the stuff in the tabloids, and this is a gossip site, not CNN.

      • carrie says:

        i stopped to believe about blindGossip’s truthfulness after to take note they write their BI after the release of articles or pics
        i stopped to believe Ted C’s blind vices after Toothy Tiles’s baby story and his yet-known celebrity vices(Lively’s fake boobs)
        i stopped to believe in Lainey after she says Jake Guyllenhal was straight and the blind riddle about Fincher and Mara (after her post about Vogue’s interview,i knew she will write about Fincher and Mara relation)
        i stopedp to believe in CDAN when i took note that his reports were inaccurate and his vintage BI were from Hollywood Babylon book (huge garbage)

      • mln76 says:

        I’m referring to thegossipboy who originated this blind
        Oh and BTW not to go into detail but I had personal non internet comfirmation that Matthew Vaugn is in fact the baby daddy to JJ’s baby. I really don’t see any comparison between the two situations… There is no evidence that Angelina was ever pregnant before Shiloh whereas JJ was pregnant but refused to name the father.

        And as I’ve said 45 times already Jerry Hall was naked in a mag breadfeeding Gabriel.
        Whatever :)

      • Sal says:

        Sombrero, if you didn’t believe it, you wouldn’t have brought it up, except to cause trouble/entice people to believe it.

    • Red Granny says:

      Haha, whatever flaots their boat :D

  7. mln76 says:

    I buy that she wasn’t interested in Mick it’s pretty close to what Colin Farrell admitted to-an over the top one sided infatuation.

  8. Toot says:

    I love that she ignored Mick, if this story is true.

    We know of Angelina’s relationships with Jonny, BBT, Timothy, and Brad, but she’s always denied Colin and didn’t have any reason to deny him since she was single at the time. As for the other guys, I think it’s just gossip.

    • Hipocrisy says:

      Colin denied it too on a french TV and in front of Jolie who went blushing in shame.

      He said basicly that he was ready and willing but that she kept on refusing to date him.

      A blushing Jolie was then asked by the host why ? She replied that Colin was too much like herself, like a twin brother.

      Olivier Martinez also was asked how she was and he said that she is extremely beautiful and gracious and smileay outisde and on set with everyone…that he saw firsthand how men would pursue her and woo her, trying to talk to her and ask her out when they are not intimidated but that she is tough to seduce and refused graciously.

    • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

      Wasn’t Timothy Hutton still in a long term relationship with Susan Sarandon at the time? I can’t see her staying with him if he was boning Jolie.

  9. Jackie O says:

    drugs, sex, men, eating disorder, cutting, affairs…maybe her lifestyle seems to look different now, but this destructive behavior just doesn’t go away…

    • lisa2 says:


      then you must have some sleepless night worrying about Drew Barrymore and RDJ.. not to mention a host of other celebs with way more destructive past then Angelina.. gosh how do you sleep.

      • Joyce says:

        Exactly. Drew Barrymore, RDJ and others did way worse than Angie. I guess they are allow a 2nd chance except Angie.

      • Rhea says:

        @Lisa2 : Right on. This is just plain silly. Whenever we see an article of Lohan doing crazy stuff we would all say that she needs to grow up and fix herself otherwise her life would end really bad.

        Yet when Jolie turn around to change herself and control her destructive side for the better, some people would scream that it’s just a big fat lie and they would waiting for her to go back to her old days “happily”.

        IMO, some people just happy to see other people keep destroying their life rather than seeing other people changing their life for the better.

    • olivia says:

      Why she was able to adopt?

      • Kim1 says:

        Oh Olivia is here .Yippee! World revolves around hating AJ LOL

      • Janet says:

        Because she went through the adoptive process, including a home study, which was approved.

        Having done many adoptive home studies, I can tell you that the agencies do not hold an applicant’s wild past against them, unless it is apparent that the applicant’s past is affecting his current functioning, or unless the applicant has a criminal history.

        Go back to reading old tabloids; that seems to give you comfort.

      • Red Granny says:

        Lol, you ALWAYS ask the same.

      • Sal says:

        Because clearly she was and is a stable person that passed all the requirements. And before any fool chimes in with she wouldn’t be accepted in America, in order to bring to child/ren to America and apply for visas/custody/residence etc she has to pass the EXACT SAME adoption requirements in America, so YES, she would (and has) pass America’s adoption assessments.

    • Toot says:

      For some people, who actually grow up, it can.

    • Kim1 says:

      I guess that applies to Drew, RDJ, Depp, etc

    • Janet says:

      People change. When their destructive behavior no longer provides satisfaction, they discard it. It’s called growing up.

      • Jackie O says:

        that is much too simplistic when you are talking about addiction. drew b and robert d went to rehab, and rd seems very committed to working a program. if she did these things too, i may have a different opinion.

      • Janet says:

        @Jackie O: You have absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Angelina was ever a hard-core addict.

      • Jackie O says:

        she did a tv interview where she said she has known addictions of every kind.

        anyway, never change loons!

      • Sal says:

        And that necessarily means drugs, and not food etc? You’re a fool Jackie.

    • Sal says:

      What ‘affairs’? I feel so sorry for you if you truly believe troubled TEENS don’t grow up, settle down and enter healthy adulthood. You really know nothing about human behavior.

  10. Minty says:

    I can’t get no satisfaction
    I can’t get no girl reaction
    ‘Cause I try and I try and I try and I try

    LOL! Sorry, couldn’t help it.

    Mick’s a talented entertainer, but he’s been fugly for more than 3 decades. He is also quite the manwhore. Thank goodness Angie has some standards. I hope it’s not true regarding her mother, because that’s just creepy.

    Read yesterday on Daily Mail that Mick was boning Carla Bruni during the early 90s while he was with Jerry Hall and Carla was with Eric Clapton. Eric supposedly asked Mick to stay away from his girlfriend. Of course he didn’t. Carla has a reputation as a serial homewrecker. She also was seeing Donald Trump(!), who was engaged to Marla Maples at the time. Ewww, the STDs that must have been passed around.

    • Hipocrisy says:

      I will never understand how someone as fugly as Mick could have Bianca, then Jerry and all those beautiful women. Geez, Jerry dumped Bryan Ferry for that ugly Jagger !

      Thanks Godness, all his girls have taken after their mother because he is all around repulsive to me…face and body are yuck and eww at the same time.

      • Minty says:

        I guess fame and wealth are powerful aphrodisiacs for some women, no matter how hideous the man is. And Mick was much more successful than Bryan. Still, it’s puzzling to me.

        Mick wasn’t bad-looking in the 1960s. His lips weren’t the monstrosity they are today. But the hard partying and heavy drugs ruined his appearance.

        See folks, that’s what too much decadence can do to you. *points and shakes finger*

      • mln76 says:

        Eh Mick Jagger is arguably one of the most brilliant songwriters of his generation that kind of makes up for his ugly mug.

      • Minty says:


        Even with all his talent, if Mick didn’t also have the fame and fortune, I doubt these particular women would give his ugly mug the time of day.

      • mln76 says:

        @minty its sort of a chicken/egg situation IMO.

      • Raven says:

        Besides fame, wealth and great music skills, he is supposed to be very well read (attended the London School of Economics) and a very entertaining companion. That is attractive to a lot of women.

      • MW says:

        I never thought MJ was that bad-looking in his younger years. He’s in his 60′s now. What do you expect? It’s never all about looks, or shouldn’t be, anyway. He is obviously talented, and I think he has an outrageous sense of humor and personality (from what I’ve seen of him).

      • stinky says:

        raven is right – the fact that he’s old & skinny is far outweighed by the fact that he’s a smart cookie, extremely rich, a talented artist, worldly, a rock-n-roll icon, etc. don’t lie & suggest that you wouldnt return his phone calls!! (i would…. i think? not positive, but probably, HAHAHaa!)

  11. Sue says:

    IMO this story was planted by Ms. Jolie, engagement hype has died down…. And I think she likes being in the news….. Like I said this is IMO.

    • Toot says:

      This new crap came out because a book about Mick is coming out and the author/publishers know the book will get attention if they put out the “juicy” Angelina part.

      I don’t see how the releasing of this crap could be linked to Angelina, but that’s your opinion.

    • Linda says:

      I know this is your opinion but you are an idiot. Angie didn’t write the book nor she co-wrote. Someone wrote it and link her name to MJ. Please do tell me how she plan this. Are you saying she planned other gossips when Ian the pig wrote his book too? How about Andrew Morton’s book? Do you really think Angie would plan this kind of news?

    • Sal says:

      I feel so sorry for you Sue, no, I honestly do. I you truly think Angelina wants this kind of attention you are fool.

  12. Joyce says:

    Angie said (don’t recall when) she only had intimate relationship with 4 men. I assume they are her teenage boyfriend, JLM, BBT and Brad. As for the other guys, maybe she did date them but probably didn’t sleep with them. I don’t believe these claims. Not until Angie confirms it.

    • Johnny says:

      And if she said it, then it has to be the gospel, right?

      Why would she confirm anything? Like others, who are frequently attacked for their “said” promiscuous behavior (JA), she owes you nothing!

  13. fabgrrl says:

    Okay, Mick Jagger kept calling her and wouldn’t take the hint that she wasn’t interested? Did she “lead him on” by being polite? By trying to maintain a friendship or working relationship with someone her mom liked, but rejecting a romance? I’m sure Mick Jagger is used to getting ALL the girls, and who hasn’t been hypnotized by Angelina Jolie? But it really doesn’t sound like Angelina was doing anything wrong.

  14. cupidityrox! says:

    Wasn’t he the one who said f’ing Jolie was like shagging a couch?

    • sullivan says:

      Nope. He didn’t. No one has ever said that about her. BBT once made a general comment that I can’t bother to look-up, but he was most assuredly not talking about Jolie. In fact, he only spoke *glowingly* about sex with Jolie. But you already knew that.

    • Raven says:

      Actually, I thought BBT did say something like that in the heat of the divorce. He was still having a hissy that she wanted to adopt.

  15. TheOriginalKitten says:

    I love the Stones and Mick Jagger is THE BOSS. That being said, I could see Jolie hitting it once for the novelty aspect and then running far, far away.

    I think she was probably pretty promiscuous back in the day but I don’t understand why people give her sh*t for that. From me, she gets a fist-bump. She was having fun and enjoying a life of freedom before she settled down-nothing wrong with that.

    • Toot says:

      “I don’t understand why people give her sh*t for that.”

      Because Angelina gets shit for everything that others are given passes for or cheered for.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        Nah, she doesn’t get any more/less shit than any other famous female on these boards. Just go look at the Sienna Miller post.

        Glad I’m not famous and having my past constantly brought up because I had a few years in my twenties full of not-so-pretty behavior. It’s always silly to me when people persecute others for things they did when they were young. As if we all haven’t had our share of transgressions…smh..

    • Johnny says:

      …and that “pass” should be allotted for ALL that have not settled down yet! ; )

  16. alexis says:

    Idk, if it is true it makes since. He likes to date women who have his lips.

  17. Mara says:

    Angelina is a beautiful woman she will never look at this man who is so not good looking at all .

  18. Talie says:

    It’s hard to know for sure what’s true because the celeb media machine was not what it is now. This was the 90s…it was much easier to be undercover. Nowadays, she would not be able to cover up her drug use or sexual partners as easily.

    • LAK says:

      It’s much easier now because we are more savvy about the games they play and the lies they tell.

  19. bej says:

    I myself find Jolie ‘hypnotic’ in a sexy way in that first pic, Mick on the other hand? Ick!!
    But yeah, this is recycled gossip from Andrew Mortons book, and not really scandalous considering it says Angie wasn’t interested. Though I’m sure there’ll be those who will be salivating over a chance to paint her as the Villainous Maneater they want her to be.

  20. jc126 says:

    Once again, I’m caught up in figuring exactly who the bio kids look like lol. Looks like Shiloh has Brad’s eyes and AJ’s lips.

    This story – I can kind of believe it. However, I think Mick’s been a hound for LOTS of women. She was wise to ignore him. He was horrible to Jerry Hall.

  21. Green_Eyes says:

    The thought of Angelina & 1999 version of Russell Crow AND she NOT returning Mick’s calls gave her a WHOLE new book of respect from me! Lol

  22. mayamae says:

    I have been so grossed out by Mic Jagger since Mackenzie Phillips said they had sex when she was 18 (while her father was banging on the door) and he told her, “I’ve been waiting for this since you were 10 years old”. It might not be true but I believed her when she said it.

  23. aud says:

    leave it to Zahara to be the only kid in the world to wear all white and have no stains on it.

    You go, Z.

  24. LoL says:

    Hahaah I remember the blind item. I really don’t think it’s true BUT Angie’s bio kids sure do look similar to Georgia Jagger ;-)

    • carrie says:

      so Brad Pitt is the biological father of Jagger ‘s half kids LOL

      • lisa2 says:

        OH my… I laughed so hard at that.. good point. good point.

      • LoL says:

        Har har, I think her kids look like her more than Pitt. Jagger, and the Jolie children have the same lips and facial features but I think you got that.

  25. Red Granny says:

    Is this supposed to be the new triangle? Angelina, Mick Jagger and Jarry Hall?

    Also, also, also: Angelina once starred in one of Meat Loaf´s music videos, so somebody might as well add him to her reputation list. Because: Ah yeah, why not? More for Brad to cry about.

  26. blah says:


  27. velourazure says:

    omg @ mick’s face. yikes.

    • Red Granny says:

      Well, we´re all getting older. Mick used to be a hottie, and on the inside he sure still is ;)

  28. Dee Cee says:

    All real men are…

  29. lisa2 says:

    I never followed the Rolling Stones (shame faced). I liked a lot of their music but didn’t know much about them. And when I saw Mick I never understood the attraction. But everyone finds different thing attractive. But as I mentioned in an earlier post I saw him walk out on the BAFTAs and I saw it. He is very charming and I didn’t know he had such a great sense of humor. He looked wonderful in the suit. Here’s the video and you see he looked really good. To me. And Angie sure doesn’t look like someone with a secret.. like hiding a child. LOL


    anyway it would be nice if people stopped obsessing over Angie’s past life over 15 years ago. Gosh but her haters won’t let go. Like a starving dog with a bone. And heaven forbid anyone like her then you are an unreasonable loon. But their negative opinions are according to them right on.. And they call her fans crazy. But I notice they get more vicious when there are not a lot of negative attacks.

    • NM6804 says:

      That is celeb culture not obsessing.

      And the truth of the matter is that Jagger did chase a lot of women but we don’t hear people complain about his connection to Bruni and others do we? No, it’s Jolie who should be left alone . Please, she’s an A-list actress with a raunchy past, of course people WILL be talking and I hardly call a book about Jagger with some stories about Jolie obsessing. Or is the writer a “hater” too?

      It’s presenting some knowledge of the celebs we love to read about. Especially those with a raunchy past. And you are an unreasonable loon since you don’t complain about Jagger being written about and the book IS about him first and foremost.

      Lastly biographies are great because they provide us new knowledge about the facade and image celebs hide in. They can deconstruct lies and bring forth some truth maybe (like Mann did with Katharine Hepburn). Also, it keeps their legacy alive and provides inside for those who didn’t live in the same period as their “idol” but want to read about them without having to look through gossip archives etc.

      • lisa2 says:

        Oh please How am I unreasonable. The comments on this thread are about ANGELINA not MICK.

        Angelina is not my IDOL. that was your term not mine. And I really don’t need you to school me on celebrity culture. My point is that this would not have made much headline if Angelina had not been mentioned. Because yes Mick was to my limited knowledge to have been a womanizer. And being a Rock Star that becomes a badge of honor. Teh only reason it is getting any Gossip blog play is only because Angie’s name is in it. MY POINT to school you is that there are these rumors about Who Angie was with without fact or proof. From her or any man. So that is the problem I have. Even the failed Biographies didn’t give any concrete information. Nothing that she herself has not talked about in the PAST.. so if she had the LEGENDARY life there would be actual proof of it all. not just what she shared in interviews.

        And when I said Haters it was not directed towards the author but the people that for the life of them act as if she is the only person in the world to have done drugs, cut herself, had sex, had children out of wedlock and whatever. They throw those things up as if they never ever happened to or by anyone before Angie. So yes that to me is a HATER when they have a double standard that is only applied to her and not others.

      • carrie says:

        you sell better with trash gossips

      • NM6804 says:

        The comments here are NOT bad so I don’t know why you are referring to some people as haters. Because they think this story is not unbelievable? Welcome to the world of gossip where polarity is reason n° 1 why celebs sell.
        You don’t have any proof that it didn’t happen so I don’t get your point. It’s hard to be right when discussing gossip.

        I used idol for lack of a better word + I didn’t say you idolized Jolie. Some people do consider celebs as their idols and do not think it’s a bad word (I certainly don’t think so).

        Actually, you should read more about this book because this isn’t the only woman they discussed. It may be on CB but the Dailymail put Carla Bruni (who was one of the reasons Jagger’s marriage failed) first in the headlines. Then it was Bowie and Bebe Buell that were mentioned and now it’s Jolie because of all the above mentioned, Jolie is the most tame story (she was inserted in the end in said paper, not headlined) out there so you are mistaken that Jolie is the only one who sells. It’s fun to read about Jagger’s conquest with famous women. I wrote a comment about Bruni and would do the same here if there would be an article about her and Jagger.

        How do you know it’s without fact or proof? A friend quoted Jolie’s mother for this book, so the writer makes it easy to trace sources should reviewers have any doubts about credibility.

        Again, this book isn’t about Jolie. Yes, books about Jolie have failed because it was obvious that it was mostly lies and rehashed tabloid stories but who knows Mr. Andersen might have something credible to write? Too soon to tell though but it looks juicy.

        Sorry but calling readers of gossip haters because they point out her drug past but giving the person who writes about her drug past a pass seems like a disconnect. He didn’t have to bring it up in relation to Jagger yet he did but he’s not a hater according to your logic. Okay then.

        As far as I know, actors like RDJ still have their past discussed on blogs whether positive or negative just like Jolie so to single her out as a victim of malicious gossip seems weird to me. She was/is keen on discussing her past HERSELF so why posters can’t comment on it is beyond me.

        Whenever there’s a “bad” story about Jolie it’s trash to the Apologists (my term for the non “haters”) but any other story in the same tabloid/book/blind item is believed. Whatever, hard to debate with that.

      • lisa2 says:

        I actually appreciate your reply. I was not terming readers of Gossip as haters. I would be calling myself that. What I refer to as haters are the nasty comments I have read. That go way beyond talking about “gossip”.

        and if you read the discussion of RDJ’s or Drew or of others then there is a huge difference. And really if you have only been on this site then when I say haters then you are totally in the dark.

        but I am a Angie fan. I don’t see her as a perfect person. The thing I like about her is that she is flawed. Made mistakes like all of us. But I do believe that what a person did years ago should not always be addressed as if it was happening today. All the “gossip” about her always always brings up the past as it was yesterday. I don’t see that with other celebs. When she is introduced it is always. her “wild past” She didn’t commit a crime. Didn’t kill anyone. Was not arrested nor has a criminal record. No rehab, Heck celebs that have had all of these don’t get the treatment she does. So that is what I call foul and unfair. Angie has spoken of her past. Honestly. And some people continue to act as if she is still 20+ years old. I have made a lot of mistakes.. miss steps. But I get to live my life today and how I conduct it onward. and not forever judged by what I did to myself, because her past is about what she did to herself as a young woman.. not others.

      • NM6804 says:

        Hey, we cool :) .

        As far as I can tell, only a few will go as far as to call Jolie a slut or anything that comes close to that. Mind you, Kaiser is a self-admitted loon and you would be hardpressed to find any truly offensive comment. In the past there were staunch anti-Jolie posters and they still would be able to keep things civil (which is why they were accepted by CB). Now, the majority of the posters here are pretty nice and eloquent when voicing their opinions.

        Non-fans have to put up with Apologists calling us names because we don’t share the Brangelina love. That’s the way the cookie crumbles.

        Well, I think her small frame contributes to the drugtalk. That and her fondness of black sacks. That’s gossip for ya’!

        While Jolie is a changed woman, she (and Pitt) have no issue with referencing her wild side when it’s convenient. If they truly would like that to go away, they wouldn’t bring it up either (they are both powerful enough to refuse those questions before the interview is getting taped).

        I think Jolie gets treated the way she does because before 2001, she made sure that everybody saw her in a “bad girl” way and then when she goes off to being a humanitarian within a year, she expects people to follow her new image. But that doesn’t sell.

        Hmm, she did kill some pets which I found utterly disturbing and inexcusable since she was around 21 when talking about it, seemingly unfazed and even happy to share that cruelty. Not cool.


        Rehab isn’t bad btw, it’s a way to get help. No shaming people for that. And I remember that she did visit some kind of rehab because she thought she was nuts. Billy Bob period? I don’t know. Another thing, a hardcore druggie who what? Supports herself in the battle of an addiction? Soooo so weird.

        Yes, everybody does make mistakes but I wouldn’t hold my breath on expecting people to not talk about the mistakes of famous people. It’s just good gossip, no harm done here.

      • LoL says:

        Nm, did you even watch the video ? She explains how her rats, hamsters and lizards accidental died because when she was a kid she gave them showers, dyed their hair and someone left the lizards out. Using that video and claiming she killed her pets on purpose is an example of a hater.

      • NM6804 says:

        Are you serious?

        For your information I DID see that video. I think it’s just a case of you sitting there with your eyes wide shut.

        She admitted to trying to kill her snake for pete’s sake and you’re still trying to spin this? Or beating an animal, a dog??? There is no excuse unless you condone that kind of behaviour because it’s Jolie.

        Even at a young age you’re supposed to know that you don’t hurt living things and certainly at six years old. I had a rat when I was a child and be darned I would take it into the shower. That sounds mental. How is that an accident? Really, who does that!?

        The only thing that is “understandable” is leaving her pets with a friend (it happens) and painting a mouse blue (although I wonder how old she was then because it’s still weird).

        And where were her parents to correct her behaviour (or bought those poor animals in the first place)? Most parents have to tell their children not to poke in the eyes of an animal but Jolie happily takes a small pet in to a shower or beats a dog. Haha, just an accident!

        There are an awful lot of dead pets in her past. Too much not to notice and AGAIN she was 21 there and no sign of remorse at all. Like she is talking about shopping or something. Pets dying because you don’t give a shit is NOT funny LoL.

        When she was with Billy Bob (years after that video), her rat Harry couldn’t take her either because the animal went nuts nevermind the toy poodles who were just left in their (BBT and Jolie’s) mansion under the care of strangers (yeah look it up). If you care about animals, you make sure you know their needs before buying one.

      • LoL says:

        As they say you hear what you want to hear and judging by your comments you obviously want to see and hear the worst from her. Listen to it again and turn your speakers up. The part where you hear she beat a dog she say ‘I think… I think a dog ended up eating him…he got sick.” I doubt that will help because like I said you WANT to hear the worst from the woman.

      • NM6804 says:

        The only thing that is clear here is that she has a bunch of dead pets and likes to talk about it when already an adult, like it’s some joke or some kind of badge of honour.

        You are clearly fine with that, maybe you’re not an animal person like her but anybody who loves animals and has a moral compass would find that sad and any child I would meet that would talk about trying to kill pets or any of the like, I would seriously advise some therapy. Those are huge red flags for somebody’s mental state.

        It seems like you only want to hear positive things but in the animal abuse case? Good luck.

      • LoL says:

        Well, the only thing that’s clear to me is you didn’t watch the video because it doesn’t even work
        In the link you provided.

        Did you have hamsters and lizards when you were growing up and are they still alive? When I was a kid my mom accidentally ran over my cat, dogs died of cancer, my cousins lizards tail fell off, hamsters died. One of the stories she tlks about happened when she was six years old fcol. I guess you’re the lucky one if you still have your childhood hamsters lol
        I see you have nothing else to say about the claim she beat a dog. Lmao if that was true it would have blew up the Internet when the video was released years ago.
        Anyway you should YouTube the video so you know what you’re talking about

      • Sal says:

        NM6804, I can’t believe you are lying with such ease. You must be heartless. She never, ever, said she ‘beat’ a dog. NEVER. Have you even listened to the video? Or are you just making things up on the spot? Also, name one child who *hasn’t* wanted to shampoo their pet. I do not believe there would be one person existing that didn’t want to shampoo, or braid, or dye their pet. I can’t believe you are that desperate to lie outright. So sad and desperate.

  30. Mira says:

    The Beatles or The Rolling Stones? Love The Beatles but The Rolling Stones tops :)

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      The Stones. ALWAYS. The Beatles’ music makes me stabby.

      • Mira says:

        Indeed. The Stones forever! This is another unresolved debate among my friends and each time the battle lines are drawn. You can imagine the scene after a few drinks ;)

      • Theoriginalkitten says:

        Me too mira! So crazy because I thought we were the only ones that had this (usually drunken) debate. Actually this very topic came up last weekend at a BBQ. A friend threatened to play “Hey Jude” in retaliation. I warned him that he should remove all sharp objects from the room lest someone get hurt :)

      • Mira says:

        It usually goes like someone requesting or playing “Hey Jude.” Everyone’s happy and all of us sing along. Then someone talks about the elephant in the room and then it’s a boom! There are the “Hey Judes” on one side and there the “Sympathy for the Devils” on the other side :)

    • Sal says:

      The Beatles were revolutionary music who changed everyones lives. The Stones were a boy band in comparison, and had no instrumental skill or lyrical ability. Rather like comparing Beethoven to Britney Spears. Apart from Satisfaction I can’t think of another song they sung, yet everyone can name at least 5 of the Beatles songs. Hands down.

  31. NM6804 says:

    You know all that drugtalk about Jolie could be a lie. She said it but that doesn’t make it true. Here again, they write that but there is no source confirming it. No on set dispute about her drug abuse, no pictures, no ex-lover claiming it. She did her job and she did it good, no erratic behaviour or breakdowns. Nothing. Yet it is widely believed she was a crazy druggie ? Hmm. A line of coke here and there maybe but really hardcore user, I don’t think so.

    And if she was indeed a hardcore user then people don’t have a leg to stand on now when they claim she can’t do all the things she does now without showing signs of drug use…

    The Mick Jagger connection, I can believe. He had so many flings so why not Jolie? If the book is credible in general then this story probably is too. It seems to have sources which is a good sign. When it gets reviewed, let’s see how it holds up.

    The other connections, I’m not sure because if they don’t have decent sources then pretty much anybody can claim it but it doesn’t make it true. Besides, the book is about Jagger, why bring in other men? Unless Jagger claims Jolie talked about them.

    I can definitely see Bertrand pushing her daughter to date a more famous man, I believe she is a failed actress and lived her dreams through her daughter who had the most chance of becoming famous. Bertrand is portrayed as the perfect mom by her children (normal) but she had her flaws for sure.

  32. Emma says:

    Not surprised anyone is infatuated with her. Every time I see an interview where the host is a guy, he looks like he’s going to melt into a puddle. Added with Olivier Martinez saying every guy on set was in love with her, Colin admitting he had a huge crush, Brad pursuing her, etc. The girl has allure like no other.

  33. Irishae says:

    I greatly prefer Angelina pre-nose job. That is all.

  34. samira677 says:

    I must be missing something because I don’t see how this is a story. The book excerpt said they were never involved. I don’t know why everybody is claiming they did date. The funny thing is Angelina didn’t return his calls and so forth but is called an evil bitch who toyed with Mick’s emotions. Also this is bs. They had dinner a few years ago during the Cannes Film Festival. If Angelina couldn’t be bother with him 15 years ago I don’t see why she would be interested in him now.

  35. Chris says:

    I think Ange would’ve shagged Mick just to have the legendary rocker as a notch on her belt. But it’s nice to know that even Mick Jagger doesn’t get it all his own way when it comes to the ladies. As for those circa 99 stories about Ange and sleeping around, I remember reading an article at the time where she allegedly claimed she was just hooking up with random guys she’d meet in hotels etc. I also remember thinking damn you wouldn’t believe your luck if you were some nobody who just happened to run in to her and score during her acting out phase. But in retrospect a lot of these stories were probably exaggerated, like most stuff that appears in the media. I mean once it’s confirmed that someone in the public eye has acted out a couple of times it gives the media carte blanche to make up all sorts of $hit and the public generally believe it. As an aside Billy Bob Thornton has recently released a book titled “The Billy Bob Tapes: A Cave Full of Ghosts.” I haven’t read it yet but I’ve ordered it at my local library. Apparently Ange wrote the introduction and says a lot of nice things about him.

  36. TeacherNan says:

    The gossip I saw insinuated that Gabriel (Jagger/Hall’s son) could possibly be Jolie’s brought up by Jagger & Hall. It is just gossip, of course, (isn’t that what this site is??), but he sure has a striking resemblance to Jolie. You can google a photo… (I have nothing more important to do- can’t you tell??)

    • EscapedConvent says:

      I’ve just seen a few pictures of Gabriel Jagger & I’d say he looks like Sinead O’Connor. So, I guess somehow Sinead is at least one of Gabriel’s parents…..

  37. Trashaddict says:

    I can tell I’m over 50 because I actually find this funny. Because the guys she was supposedly juggling at the time, I would NOT want to be sleeping with all of them in the same month! (OK, maybe more than one, but a shorter and more pleasing list than that!) Given the assorted personalities, who would want that kind of drama?

  38. Aud says:

    This is not a new detail. This was mentioned in Andrew Morton’s biography of Angelina as well. Don’t know why it’s making headlines now.

  39. Ginger says:

    I also think the speculation about her love life is exaggerated. But agree that she and JLM were a hot couple! However, even if she did sleep with a lot of men I don’t fault her for it. We are allowed to sow our wild oats just as much as men IMO. Still, I’m glad to see that she has a more stable life these days and she seems happy.

  40. Eleonor says:

    The most funny thing to me is the she scared him ” a little bit ” .
    Mick Jagger the one and only! He survived the ’60s and the ’70s!
    Angie what did you do to him! LOL

  41. Chris: now with 10% less negativity says:

    Out of interest what drugs was she supposed to be addicted to?

  42. Chris: now with 10% less negativity says:

    It’s alright I looked it up. It was smack and blow.

  43. MOON says: