HRH Prince Crumpets is going to be ‘obsessed with privacy’ & kind of neurotic

I was going to wait to write about some of the Royal Baby stuff (otherwise known as The Prince Crumpets Extravaganza) until we had gotten the first photos of the Cambridges post-birth, when they stood outside of the hospital with their new baby. Unfortunately, royal reporters are now being told that William and Kate probably won’t leave the hospital until “6 pm” and it might even be later than that, or even tomorrow. Which means we won’t have photos for a while, and I’m not going to waity. So let’s get to some Prince Crumpets news! First off, astrologers have already done the baby’s charts and it’s quite interesting if you like horoscopes and stuff:

The full horoscope of Kate Middleton and Prince William’s son contains rare and deeply auspicious alignments. This is a royal heir who will grow up in challenging times but will eventually preside over an era of marvels. The future monarch will be remembered for the rest of time as the rule-breaker who became a peacemaker.

He will find an inner reserve of strength that shapes his character and moulds him into a truly charismatic monarch. His story will be full of hard-won victories and narrow escapes – and these same themes will run through the story of his subjects.

I base my predictions on far more than just the fact that the new arrival is a sensitive Cancerian, like his father and his departed grandmother, Diana. And, by the way, he is a Cancerian. The Sun entered Leo (and thus the sign of Leo began), just a couple of minutes after he drew his first breath. So he is a Cancerian, through and through, even though he was born as close to the end of this sign as his father was born to the beginning of it.

He was born at the time of the Full Moon. Children born so close to the lunar culmination invariably lead charmed yet challenging lives. There are other fascinating factors in his chart, too. Just a few hours before he was born, Venus moved from Leo to Virgo, suggesting that babies born this week will be especially blessed with clever, inquiring minds.

And all this happened just as Mercury ended a particularly difficult ‘retrograde phase’. Children born when Mercury is retrograde often tend to be more thinkers than doers. It is almost as if the new heir to the throne waited until he was a week overdue in order to pick up every possible astrological advantage.

He has the Moon in Capricorn, and Scorpio rising. These are slightly trickier influences: Moon in Capricorn people can be self-critical, and those with Scorpio rising can sometimes jealously guard their privacy.

Readers of my regular column know that this week there is a phenomenon known as a ‘Watery Grand Trine’ being formed in the sky between Neptune in Pisces, Saturn in Scorpio and the conjunction of Jupiter and Mars in Cancer. Many people are calling this a Harmonic Convergence, and seeing it as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to ‘heal the world’, to promote a culture of greater spirituality and to increase an awareness of the need for world peace. This child inherits the spirit of this convergence and will carry it with him throughout his life.

[From Hello Magazine]

The moon in Capricorn and Scorpio rising, which means he’ll be neurotic and obsessed with privacy? That should be interesting. Of course, it’s not like an astrologer ever looked at a baby’s charts and said, “Oh yeah, this kid’s going to be a serial killer.” Also, I’m wary of her claim that the kid is going to be a Cancerian through and through – I’ve always heard that “Cusp” signs are trickier. Like, someone born on the cusp of two signs, like this kid, will often have traits of both signs.

Let’s see, other news… Prince William issued a statement yesterday, hours after the birth of his child, saying simply that “we could not be happier.” He also issued a public thanks to the staff of St. Mary’s Hospital, saying, “We would like to thank the staff at the Lindo Wing and the whole hospital for the tremendous care the three of us have received. We know it has been a very busy period for the hospital and we would like to thank everyone – staff, patients and visitors – for their understanding during this time.” A spokesperson also told the press that “mother, son and father are all doing well this morning.” Then why can’t we see them?! Baby photos, stat!

There are also a bunch of stories about how Kate and William haven’t hired a nanny (YET) and how that makes them “just like us” etc. I bet they have a baby nurse, though, and Kate and the baby are going to the Middleton house straight away, where Carole will act as a full-time nanny I’m sure. The Daily Mail also has a flat-out fascinating story about Prince Charles and what kind of grandfather he’ll be and how he really doesn’t like little children at his “fastidious” Highgrove estate. There are also some details about Charles’ wariness about William’s closeness with the Middleton family. That whole piece is worth a read.

Newspaper covers courtesy of Fame/Flynet, spoof photo courtesy of Twitter.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

108 Responses to “HRH Prince Crumpets is going to be ‘obsessed with privacy’ & kind of neurotic”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. blue marie says:

    haha, the Lion King photo totally made this post worth it..

  2. dorothy says:

    I really can’t blame them, given what happened to his mother.

    • FLORC says:

      Dorothy
      It’s a lesson hard learned. Don’t get in the car with a drunk driver and always wear your seat belt.

      • Angel says:

        That’s very good advice in general, FLORC, and many lives would be saved if people heeded those wise words. However, as all of the (uncontaminated) evidence points to the fact that Henri Paul was NOT drunk, that evening, such advice does not seem entirely relevant in the case of the late Princess Diana.

        (In fact, during the formal Inquest, it was concluded that her death was, in truth, an “Unlawful Killing”, perpetrated by people in other vehicles that had shared the road with her, that fateful evening.

        And, of course, there’s more…but, I don’t think that this is the place or time, for that discussion. 😉 )

        Sadly, as with other major events, Princess Diana’s tragic death is yet another instance in which the media (and government(s)) disseminated false and misleading information, after the event — and the public, at large, accepted this information blindly, without diligent research, rational analysis, or questioning.

        But, on a lighter note, I’m so thrilled for Prince William and Princess Kate, and I hope that they’re able to enjoy raising the new little Prince in a happy & peaceful atmosphere, away from the glare of the media and others. 🙂

      • Mary says:

        weary old AlFayed rehashed crap. AlFayed didnt take care of her and they killed her.

      • Angel says:

        Actually, Mary, with all due respect…That [the “Unlawful Killing” conclusion] was the actual determination that was made, following the Inquest.

        (It’s also worth noting that, during this Inquest, it was disclosed that when the authorities first (thoroughly) searched Henri Paul’s home, following his demise, an abnormal amount of liquor bottles were not found. Yet, when they searched it for a second time — again, AFTER Mr. Paul had passed away — there was suddenly an abundance of liquor bottles…ones that had not been there, previously. And, this example is merely the tip of the proverbial iceberg, as it were.

        Mr. Al Fayed had absolutely nothing to do with this disclosure, nor with the resulting “verdict”; as such, I honestly don’t understand the foundation of your comment.)

        It is rather bizarre, though, how people are more apt to believe — and defend — the information fed to them by an extremely biased media than the information that comes from witnesses who saw the events, first-hand, or people who were directly involved in the occurrences. These are strange times we live in, I guess… 😉

  3. aang says:

    I have been waiting to see some version of that Lion King photo.

  4. tracking says:

    That’s a pretty big baby for a first delivery! She’s probably quite sore and tired. Hope she gets a little rest before the onslaught.

    • Noodles says:

      My first baby was 9 pounds. I think the soreness will depend on how long they had her push. With my 1st, I pushed for 2 hours because the doctors did not wait for 10cm and the baby to drop. I could not walk properly for three weeks. And let’s not get started about the stitches.

      Second, pushed for 3 pushes. Things back to normal quickly.

      If she did push for a long time/tear, I feel really bad for her having to walk out in public like that.

      • Isa says:

        My SIL pushed once, I pushed for 45 minutes. She had a worse recovery than I did. Every pregnancy and delivery is different.
        Judging by how she’s walking she seems to be doing great. Glad to see it!

  5. DanaG says:

    The baby has to be seen he is a future King. No matter what William wants he can’t hide him away. I think he will do a deal with the press and do a couple of official shoots in exchange for privacy. It’s actually what happened with him and Harry the first couple of years. Gradually he will have to come out and wave and meet the people and William may not like it but he knows he has too. I’ve heard lot’s about Charles he doesn’t like Camilla’s grandkids there are five of them they are noisy so she goes to her own house and spends time with them there. That story has been around for ages. Be interesting to see how he copes with his own Grandchildren.

  6. brin says:

    Considering the whole world is watching them, who can blame them for wanting privacy.

    • Micki says:

      I won’t say I “blame” them but in a time when the new Pope drives in an open car and “dives” in the croud to see that another public figures is “obssessed” about their privacy is sort of too much.
      Their existence is one of a public figure, their role is public and the next king is a public matter too.
      I’m sure that the rest of the RFs got privacy after the official baby photo ops.
      I don’t get why the whole fuss…

    • Anna says:

      If you receive a multi-million government paycheck (sorry, ‘allowance’), you sign away quite a bit of privacy. If you dont want that – well, you can resign your title, become a commoner, and get a regular job, even abroad. A number of other Euro royals have done that.

    • Lucy says:

      Yeah, I think they’re just trying to be careful, this will honestly be the last time the child gets real privacy, once they leave the hospital there’s going to be paparazzi and helicopters buzzing around them snapping photos non-stop

      • Anna says:

        Until they go to one of a dozen of their fam’s private estates. Nobody is going to fly a helicopter over Balmoral or Highgrove. And Kate has only been photographed – not even papped, but just by onlookers – when she’s out on one of her many shopping trips.

      • FLORC says:

        Anna
        Well said on both comments. When people say that it’s ok because they themselves would do the same they’re lost. William can never be “just like us” and Kate worked very hard to not be as well. There is the trade off. If William has a problem with privacy he should have given up his perks. If he finds it so hard to become a full time royal this late in the game this is not the position for him.

    • Tulip Garden says:

      I don’t blame them either. It isn’t like they have scurried thru underground tunnels to prevent people seeing their baby. For heaven’s sake, Baby Crumpets isn’t even two days old yet! Plus we know that the parents will present him when they leave the hospital. I don’t think that taking a day or of new family bonding time makes them super-hermitlike.
      Not saying that they won’t be fiercely protective b/c they should be. Just saying that we don’t know if they are going to be asshats about it…yet.

  7. Emma says:

    Damn. That a big baby.

  8. HH says:

    The Lion King photo is more than accurate. Crowds were waiting outside of the Palace; The golden easel announcement. No one does pomp and circumstance like the Brits.

  9. Cicada says:

    I don’t think my eyes could roll any harder at that astrology nonsense.

    • Jackie says:

      I know, right? I don’t know why in this day and age people still believe in that stuff.

    • Maria says:

      its not only nonsense, its discriminating. you cant judge people on the day they were born. its like judging people based on their sexuality or nationality.

    • Thiajoka says:

      Honestly! LOL.

  10. DeltaJuliet says:

    It’s so silly, but I’m just excited that he was born on my son’s 10th birthday, AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. I mean, there are a lot of minutes in a day 😉

    I was telling my son this morning that some day, he will share a birthday with the King of England, and the same birth time lol. He wasn’t impressed.

    Now, if they name the baby Andrew, I’ll be beside myself 🙂

  11. Lulu86 says:

    Funny how Kim was massive and gave birth to a premie and Kate was quite slender and gave birth to a big boy at 8lb. Women really do carry differently.

    • Macey says:

      That was my first thought when I heard Kate’s baby weight. KK’s body was also completely distorted from her lipo in the gut and injections in the butt.
      Im sure she would have looked different if it wasnt for her own rearranging of her own fat. Should be interesting to see how she shapes out in a year or so. PS can only do so much and once you start sucking the fat from one place and putting it into another, its only a matter of time before those injected fat cells expand and get lumpy. Her butt is probably a mess and it’s not b/c of the pregnancy.
      Im just glad this baby is taking over the headlines. I really dont care about either but Id rather read and see Kate and Will in the news than anything Kardashian.

    • Decloo says:

      That’s a pretty typical boy baby versus girl baby thing. Remember Busy Philips? She was huge. As was Kim. Boy babies tend to stay front and center while girl babies make the mom pretty fat all over.

      • taxi says:

        Uh, no. Front & center vs. fat all over depends on mother’s size, skeletal length & structure (pelvis-rib cage) and eating habits.

    • fallen says:

      You have to remember that Kim is also way shorter than Kate, Kim is like 5’2 and Kate 5’9 or ’10. When your short there isn’t that much room in the torso for the baby to go.

  12. Maria says:

    i dont feel well with that astrology stuff when you realize that people are discriminated against because of the day they were born. in austria a court ruled that a company is allowed to only hire certain star signs because the others are bad in their view.

    • Apples says:

      Wow, that’s a crazy story!

      Don’t feel bad. A LOT of people who walk into an interview are “discriminated” against within the first 30 seconds on something. We realize this, and that’s why there are so many articles, books, videos, classes dedicated to being so impressive it overcomes interviewer’s perceptions of who they wanted for a job. To be so impressive that your age, race, sex, etc., doesn’t get in your way.

    • Cicada says:

      Whoa, I went and read an article about this and that is so absurd!

  13. Lilly says:

    I could care less about these unremarkable people who scored a genetic lottery. I am however very entertained thimking about what they would be upto were it not for the checks to their power that the British have erected.

    For one thing 64 year old Charles would have long deposed (or decapitated) his mother for that crown. The Middletons would have wheedled a duchey by now and would likely be plotting to dethrone Charles. Harry would be off bankrupting the kingdom in pointless wars around the continent, always escorted by a personal physician to deal with that pesky syphillis. Kate would still be a vacuous socialite with no meaningful enterprise beyond “nabbing” a Prince. And William would still be a mothy 30 year old with not a modernising bone in his body. Now THAT would be worth blogging about.

  14. Talie says:

    Thank God for the Middletons… the royals sound like just the frigid people that child should be surrounded and influenced by…NOT!

    • Anna says:

      “we could not be happier.” – I mean, really, could you have a more generic and predictable ‘statement’? It’s so half-assed. Not like they couldnt have their PR people prep something beforehand either.

    • Decloo says:

      This is very true and lucky for Kate, William and the baby, but it’s really not the fault of the Royals. Don’t forget that Charles and his siblings were not brought up in a warm household. (I think Queen Elizabeth left newborn Anne for like a month.) Being loving is a learned behavior If you are brought up without warmth and in a world where nobody expresses emotions, you will always be rather awkward in emotional situations. Diana defied the odds. She was obviously a very loving and doting mother despite the fact that her own mother pretty much abandoned her and when off to live in South America with a polo player.

      • Annikins17 says:

        Ahem. That was Sarah Ferguson’s mum.

        After (finally) producing the requisite male heir, Diana’s mum bolted with the heir to a wallpaper fortune.

      • taxi says:

        Baby Charles was alone for months while his parents were on a long, world trip.

  15. Liberty says:

    British astrologer Jonathan Cainer wrote it, and he’s considered to be quite good, and with a sense of humor as well. My work friends and I read him for fun and I must say, he amazes even the haters quite often.

    Anyway, the link re royal Baby Crumpets:

    http://www.cainer.com/features/royal_baby.html

    • Micki says:

      If you are in UK can you possibly tell me the name of another astrologer? He looks like an aging rocker with a long blond mane.

      • Adrien says:

        John Frawley? But he’s not blond. He looks like Bono.

      • Micki says:

        He doesn’t look like the one I mean. He seemed naturally blond and without glasses.I had a magazine extra booklet from him and found it witty and quite on the point. Just don’t know where it is now that damn piece of paper
        On the other hand the name sounds familiar

  16. FreeSpiritedGirl says:

    HRH Baby Crumpet’s name has been announced. It’s DAVE.

  17. MsGoblin says:

    So, in the royal announcement they displayed outside Buckingham Palace, they typed-in the gender of the child, but hand-wrote the time.

    Sounds like they knew the sex of the baby, after all.

    • Emma says:

      Or they had two? One for a girl and one for a boy.

    • LAK says:

      they always prepare 2 statements with time left blank and then fill out the blanks and display the appropriate statement.

  18. AmandaPanda says:

    Wouldn’t be so sure they’ll wait til 6 – the helicopters just started buzzing over kensington palace, which usually indicates a royal leech is about to arrive or depart.

  19. floretta50 says:

    Strange how two seemingly rich women give birth to babies that signal a problem pregnancy. Kate and as someone mentioned Kim K. Huge babies especially for a first pregnancy could be a sign of diabetes and Kim K had swollen feet signaling a preeclampsia pregnancy.

    • Dawn says:

      Let’s not soil this by bringing up of all people the famewhores of all famewhores. Just let this be about the Royal baby. My sister’s first baby was over 81bs and she did not have anything wrong with her. My son was three weeks early and was 7 lbs 3 ozs. Sometimes it really is how one takes care of themselves.

      • Ktx says:

        I was well over 8 lbs, as were two of my three siblings. I knew 8+ was considered big but not abnormally or dangerously so.

      • T.C. says:

        No need to be snobby. At least Kim K does some work for her fame and money. Kate Middleton is a rich socialite no different from Paris Hilton. The only thing her child is going to be in charge of is ribbon cutting ceremonies and playing polo. Let’s not act like the Royal family are anything but reality stars who have empty celebrity.

      • er says:

        I read that as 81 lbs!

    • Marigold says:

      Kate’s baby was not huge. My baby weighed more and I was never in danger of having gestational diabetes. An average baby is usually over 7lb. So one over 8lb is totally normal. It’s not like she and William are tiny people. Geez. Also, my feet were huge at the end. Some women just retain water. Lets let the doctors do the diagnosing, eh?

    • Yvonne says:

      I weighed a grand 9 pounds, 2 ounces, at birth. My mother, a very healthy lady, gained a total of twenty five pounds while she was pregnant. Granted, I was also rather long at nearly 23 inches, but some babies are just born big, regardless of how the mother behaved while pregnant. To suggest that a somewhat large baby is *always* the result of an unhealthy pregnancy is absurd.

    • FLORC says:

      It’s truly hilarious how the posters here that hate KimK so much are always thinking about her. Always bringing her up when no one else is talking about her. As I said before. It’s like the ex bf you claim you’re so over, but you’re always talking about him. Get over it and move on if you truly can’t stand her. Stop trying to start conversations about her.

      • Isa says:

        The baby was certainly bigger than I expected. But not anything out of the ordinary. Boys typically weigh more at birth too. I gave birth to a 9 lb 6 oz boy and my dr is keeping an eye on me during this pregnancy. I already had my diabetes test once, and passed so far.

  20. Chutzpah says:

    Just to clarify – no such thing as a ‘cusp’ if you are into the astrology – you are a Cancer until in changes to Leo then you are a Leo. And he isn’t going to be a Cancerian by any stretch anyway – He has ALOT of Scorpio

    And we all know what Scorpios are like lol

    • Micki says:

      Tread carefully here! I married a Scorpio and 10 years after I still love the most of him. LOL
      P.S. about the “cusp” agree completely. I think it comes from people on the “changing” days who read both horoscopes and can’t decide which they like more so they put one together…

      • Chutzpah says:

        Aww glad you got a good’un

        I take it all with a pinch of salt and its not all about determinism anyway – that was medieval astrology – my friend works as a researcher for an astrologer, she was laughing at the Jonathan Cainer article because unfortunately they fall into the same sycophantic crap as everyone else – she was told that his birth chart shows someone with power ‘issues’
        Those that say its the dysfunctional family he has been born into that will make sure he does not become exceptional are most likely right.

      • Micki says:

        Imagine what will happen if an astrologer comes forward ahd says: “On his 16th birthday he’ll fall in love with an overused Barbie doll and the conflict of unfullfiled desires will turn him into a monk.”
        In a way I understand the favorable outcome. Plus with the given longevity of the Windsors the astrologers won’t have to “pay back” when the time comes.

        On another note: I must say I look on a private chart differently than on the daily/weekly/bla horoscope. And don#t think the stars determine completely our life-we’ll be robots then but give general “posibilities” of development.

      • Mel says:

        Well, I am a double cusp (not just the Sun sign, but the ascendant too), and I could be the perfect “exhibit A” for the school of thought that actually treats cusps as “signs” – or situations – of their own, not just a mix of the two adjacent signs (let alone one sign only).

        Too bad I don’t really give a fig about astrology. 🙂

        And then these ridiculous statements… Like “Moon in Capricorn people can be self-critical, and those with Scorpio rising can sometimes jealously guard their privacy.”

        I have neither, yet I am hyper-critical of myself and I am *extremely* jealous of my privacy.

    • MousieBrown says:

      I am either Aries or Taurus depending on what date is used in the range. April 20 is categorized differently depending on the source listing the dates.

      For the record, April 20 at 6:05 pm.

      • Chutzpah says:

        Its all about where it was the year you were born – im on the Pisces Aries ‘cusp’ the year I was born it was in Pisces – most years since the sun is already in Aries when my birthday rolls around.

    • bluhare says:

      Thank you Chutzpah. We are indeed beautiful and caring people. Not to mention geniuses.

      • Chutzpah says:

        I will just agree to whatever you say Ms Scorpio – otherwise you will no doubt start making a personalised voodoo doll for me 😉

      • bluhare says:

        Chutzpah, never!! I do my shanking in person. 😉

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I need help with the cusp situation!

      In some horoscopes it says my birthday is one sign, others say it is another sign. Is there something I should be looking for to find my “true” sign?

  21. TheyPromisedMeBeer says:

    I’m ignoring the astrology nonsense because we all know his parents. Unless there is a nanny/teacher/well-meaning ginger uncle who can subvert the rules of genetics and counteract his parents personality quirks (or lack thereof), there is no way that kid is going to be a deep thinker, or charismatic, amazeballs leader. I wish the poor kid the best, because he’ll need it, and I hope that I’m pleasantly surprised years from now.

    Yeah. I said it. Come at me.

    • Christin says:

      I’m in agreement. Hopefully the child will be around someone who can provide a deeper, more selfless influence. It will be interesting to see if the child behaves like his father did as a little boy (not exactly charming).

      • m says:

        If he needs the example of a selfless life he need not look any further than his paternal great grandparents.

    • EVM says:

      For now he just needs lots of hair 🙂

    • m says:

      Well another astrologer said that when he is 29, there will be no monarchy left in England, so it would seem that we are getting worked up over nothing.

  22. melmel says:

    wow the baby will be obssessed and neurotic about privacy! sounds like his daddy

    • Ollie says:

      my thoughts exactly.

      This boy is doomed. Every classmate will have an iPhone/ smartphone. In less than 5 minutes all will be in the internet. Poor boy, he´ll need a good therapist

    • Decloo says:

      Jeez, his mother was hounded by paparazzi and was killed in a car accident trying to escape the. Give the guy a break.

  23. Queenfreddie says:

    I’ve been reading a lot about astrology and some cultures put more into the moon sign than into the sun sign. Of course a full birth chart is always best, but in in this case the moon sign is Capricorn which may be a good thing. Capricorn’s take duty seriously and the baby *might take his role as future King seriously as he grows into his role and adulthood. His Cancer sign a great sign to work with people too (shows compassion) but again like it says above all signs have negative aspects as well as positive.

  24. Birdix says:

    Does it seem like she is leaving the hospital quickly? Don’t they usually give new mothers 2 days before they are released? In years past it used to be a week.

  25. heathcliff says:

    Moon in Capricorn makes you depressive and boring. Cancer Sun with a Capricorn Moon and Scorpio Rising is going to make him extremely emotional and volatile rlly.

  26. Talie says:

    Carole and Michael Middleton arrived at the hospital… along with people carrying garment bags and a car seat. Probably in the next hour or so since the weather looks clear.

  27. Ravensdaughter says:

    A nuts as the Brits are about this, I feel sorry for William, Kate, and the male heir.
    When I found out the gender of le bebe…..my reaction was…..snoooze…..business as usual for another generation.

    • Mel says:

      “When I found out the gender of le bebe…..my reaction was…..snoooze…..business as usual for another generation.”

      What do you mean? The UK monarch ahas been a woman for quite a few generations now.

      Not that it makes much difference, anyway, in my opinion.
      And in this case even less so, because this monarch has no political power to speak of.

  28. Tina says:

    Now we know she gave the suffed animal to her dog.. Lol… You remember when she got a stuffed animal and Waity was like thank you ill give it to my d.. Everyone thought she was having a girl.

    • MyLittlePony says:

      😀 Exactly what I was thinking.

    • bluhare says:

      Imagine how many stuffed animals Lupo has “killed” so far.

    • Tulip Garden says:

      I thought of this too! That actually made me like her more. She gets a stuffed animal and thinks of her fur baby. I might do the same 🙂

    • Mel says:

      “and Waity was like thank you ill give it to my d.. Everyone thought she was having a girl.”

      Actually, it was only the Daily Mail (and that poor woman who asked her the question) who thought that.

      But the “my d….” could very well have been just a little game Kate was playing – nothing sinister, just a little game, to fuel whatever she thought needed fuelling.
      She does that a lot; and apparently she is good at it.

  29. janie says:

    Any new mom is paranoid with their first born, Will & Kate are no different.. Their lives are so amped up, every precaution has to be taken to insure his safety. That’s just common sense. I wish them many wonderful years & more babies.

  30. bluhare says:

    Best headline was Private Eye.

    WOMAN HAS BABY

  31. Nicolette says:

    I just wish them well and congratulations 🙂

  32. CassT says:

    Obsessed with privacy is the reason that poor nurse was driven to suicide. I bet the royals complained about her when Kate was in the hospital for morning sickness.

    • RobN says:

      Poor lady had a history of mental illness and previous suicide attempts way before the hospital incident. Blaming this couple for her problems is really a ridiculous stretch. You may not like them, but they have a right to medical privacy just like the rest of us.

      • CassT says:

        Its entirely possible (in fact, VERY PROBABLE) that the royals complained about the hospital staff falling for the prank phone call. Yes she has a right to medical privacy, but that is a separate issue. Kate and Will are simply a waste of taxpayer money.

  33. dahlianoir says:

    I’m going to London in september, I’m SO buying my little prince teapot 😀

  34. Flower says:

    I actually don’t think much of this astrologer a Cancer through and through, not likely as as his Sun will progress into Leo in a matter of months, for the next thirty years after that he will exhibit Leo character traits, Scorpio is rising but his entire first house after the first 3 degrees is Sagittarius. Capricorn moon is interesting often called ‘the cold moon’ his head will always rule his heart and very few people will ever know the real man, he will be very self contained and serious, what some call ‘an old soul’

    short horoscope below

    http://www.astro.com/cgi/atxgen.cgi?btyp=akx

  35. Thinker says:

    William looks so nervous and Kate looks tired, yet both of them look to be absolutely brimming with happiness and pride. Kate deserves credit for obviously quitting her ciggies habit, because that is one big baby! Mom and Dad are so entitled to feel proud of their healthy boy, he’s advanced with his gesturing, and appropriately fussy, as justly befits a little Prince.

    It’s such a lovely photo op that I will even give Kate a pass on the fact her REAL due date was July 19. It’s just a week in the grand scheme of things anyway. Her belly is awesome, I didn’t expect such realism from her. Good on, Kate.

  36. I’ve got some sort of MacBook laptop computer and additionally I’d prefer our snap shots that can be on our laptop computer that they are on our Motorola Razr 2 v9. I’ve got some sort of memory card including a memory card adapter. Whenever i insert all the cards in your adapter, all the laptop computer knows it again. Additionally, the snap shots that i possess on our cellular phone are able to move in the laptop computer devoid of situation. Although the snap shots on our laptop computer would not move so that you can our cellular phone. Everything results is a big red-colored “x” over a ebony show. ‘m MY SPOUSE AND I going through a little something completely wrong? His phone business is definitely AT&T..