Octomom offered pr0n gig; scared hospital won’t let her take babies home

90222w9_suleman_b_gr_0911

Octomom Nadya Suleman has gotten quite the creepy job offer: porn. Creepy, but not unexpected. Anytime a woman under fifty years old is in the news for anything, you can pretty much guarantee that either a porn film company or a nudie magazine is going to make that woman an offer to take off her clothes… and in Suleman’s case, they asking her to go a bit further.

Adult film studio Vivid Entertainment has offered Nadya $1 million and a year of health insurance for her passel of kids if she agrees to star in one of their films.

Octomom needs money, the world needs porn. It’s a match made in the Valley heaven. Or so think the opportunistic porn peddlers at adult powerhouse Vivid Entertainment, who have made Nadya Suleman a halfway-decent indecent proposal, offering the cash-strapped mother of 14 $1 million, plus a year of health insurance, in exchange for shaking her babymaker in a XXX film.

“Nadya obviously needs income to ensure that her children are secure, so we are offering her up to $1 million to act in one movie,” says Vivid cochair Steven Hirsch. “We’ve had many single mothers work with us over the years, and their income from Vivid has been very important to them. We would schedule production so the movie could be shot in less than one week.”

And they say chivalry is dead. “There is a tremendous amount of interest in Nadya, and we can help her capitalize on that interest and put some real cash in her bank account,” Hirsch said, adding that, offscreen at least, they would do their best to make sure Suleman wasn’t put into any compromising positions. “As with our Vivid Girls, she would have her choice of partners, including ‘Octodad.’ “

[From E! News]

I don’t even want to know who “Octodad” is. And I’ve learned not to look up porn stars unless you’re braced for some really unsavory search results. So I’m going to let that mystery go.

I can imagine few things more inappropriate and tacky to offer. Nadya’s convinced she can make enough money off a book to support her kids. But even the $1 million Vivid is offering isn’t going to last all that long with 14 kids, several with special needs. I don’t know how Nadya thinks she can make a living on a book, unless she plans on writing long-term. And as her mother point out, when is she going to get the time to do that?

Nadya filmed a show with Dr. Phil, the first part of which aired today. She said she’s afraid the hospital won’t let her take the octuplets home from the hospital since she has no job, too many kids, and likely won’t have a home in a few weeks.

Suleman sat down with the marginally less exploitative Dr. Phil McGraw this week, and revealed fears that the hospital will not release her octuplets until she has proven she can provide them with adequate care and living arrangements—this, in the wake of reports that she is being evicted from her home for failing to make good on more than $23,000 in mortgage payments.

The babies are currently receiving care at Los Angeles’ Kaiser Permanente Medical Center. Suleman, who currently has no job and who has been receiving government assistance for her six older children, sat down with Dr. Phil for a two-part special, the first of which airs today.

Staying true to straight-talk form, the good doctor didn’t hold back in his critique of the mother. “I see somebody I do believe is very loving, but I see somebody that has such a Pollyanna disconnect with real-world realities, and what she’s getting ready to face, it’s like she’s on a Disney ride.” Dr. Phil told Suleman, “If you don’t have plans in place, you need to say so, so we can help…People need to know you get it.”

“I think I’ll fully get it when they are ready to come home,” she said.

[From E! News]

The thing is, the octuplets won’t be “ready to come home,” if Nadya doesn’t have a plan. Without a home, the hospital probably won’t let her take them. And she needs to get her act together and come up with a long-term plan, too.

Dr. Phil was being generous, saying she has a “Pollyanna disconnect.” It’s not untrue, but that’s the kindest way one could put it. He likes to get sponsors on board in exchange for long-running publicity, and I’m guessing he’s going to offer her some kind of help, but it won’t last forever. I really wonder what Nadya thinks she’s going to do in ten years when everyone’s lost interest? Sell her lip implants on eBay?

I hope the hospital is very, very cautious in releasing these babies, and makes sure they don’t go home with Suleman until she has a safe, clean home and can provide for them.

Here’s Nadya Suleman and some of her children shown at the park on Sunday. Images thanks to BauerGriffinOnline.

90222w9_suleman_b_gr_0111

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

36 Responses to “Octomom offered pr0n gig; scared hospital won’t let her take babies home”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Eileen Yover says:

    GROSS! Who would watch that?
    It would be like f’ing a warm glass of milk.

  2. Blah Girls says:

    omg pleaseee Noooo! i don’t want whoever watches it to go blind

  3. Chiara says:

    Media hype for both the magazine and Nadya … Sycophants unite!

    Rollin’ rollin’ rollin’ …keep that money rollin’

  4. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    By “Octodad” I believe they mean the sperm donor.

    That being said, yuck. How would that be any different than women back in the day who had to work as prostitutes to feed their kids?

    She needs to stop dying her hair so dark black. It’s really unnatural looking.

    Ok but anyway, yeah, she’s about to get a HUGE reality check when the hospital says “well they are healthy enough to go home, but you have no home. Sooo….they aren’t going home with you.”

    You know what happens then? CPS gets involved, officially. It’s the same thing if a homeless woman has a baby at the hospital, then can’t take it with her. The hospital surely would need those NICU beds and resources once the babies are healthy enough. They can’t just live at the hospital indefinitely for no medical reason.

  5. TinaWithPom says:

    Ewwww… I’m cringing at the thought of this woman’s vagina up-close and personal. Yikes! *head hurts*

  6. SixxKitty says:

    It could be marketed as a contraceptive, I mean, who in the world would want to see that woman in a porn movie?

  7. the original kate says:

    eeeeewwwwwwww!

  8. Bodhi says:

    I think this will all end very badly. I really hate to say something like that, but I just can’t imagine any part of this whole thing ending well 🙁

  9. Maritza says:

    Who would want to see that stretched out belly of hers, not to mention how ugly she looks with those fake fat lips of hers.

  10. Trillion says:

    Where’s my Dante these days anyhow?

  11. Scribe85 says:

    Goodness, she is a disturbed and selfish individual. Keeping her in the public eye is only going to hurt her children. She doesn’t have the money to hire body guards. Please no more about her! Please, please, please!

  12. Shannon says:

    I know I’m in the minority, but I think they should send the children home. If after they are home and she proves she cannot take care of them then they should take them. This preemptive by action is asinine and not totally legal IMO. I understand the concern, but wait until she’s proven she can’t take care of the children.

  13. Kate says:

    I would be so happy if CPS came and got her kids tomorrow.

  14. Chickie says:

    @ anastasiabea: “The hospital surely would need those NICU beds and resources once the babies are healthy enough. They can’t just live at the hospital indefinitely for no medical reason. ”

    Amen to that AND your call of “yuck” on the thought of watching Octomom and Cap’n Sperm Donor filmed and marketed. Not to beat the dead horse of “personal responsibility” but… how can someone treat human life so disgracefully, especially in economic times when houses are being yanked from good people who would otherwise pay their bills if they didn’t have 14 in-vitro grandkids under their roof?

    And to think… I know of NICUs which, when subjected to an octuplet burden, would go from comfortably staffed to seriously understaffed in a heartbeat.

  15. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    Shannon, what if there’s no home to take them TO?

  16. alize says:

    “scared hospital won’t let her take her babies home”…

    before too long it’s going to “what home?”

    good job numbnuts, waste your settlement money you should have been using to take care of your 6 other children, getting implanted with 8 MORE you can’t take care of.

  17. Shane says:

    A million dollars for maybe a couple hours of work. I would seriously do just about any sexual act on camera for one million dollars. Have to figure 14 kids counts as a big tax deduction too, lol.

  18. NotBlonde says:

    I was enjoying a nice glass of wine and an apple tart and now that I’ve gotten that image in my head…*ugh* Just makes me sick to my stomach.

    This woman needs to have her children taken from her and put in a mental hospital (sanitarium? what is the PC way of saying that?)

  19. czarina says:

    Just wondering if, legally, the hospital even has a right to say “No, they can’t go home with you.”
    I know when I had my kids the hospital insisted on seeing the car seat we were taking the baby home in…although I have no idea how long they would presume to keep the baby if a parent didn’t produce one (or maybe they would try to get them a loaner?)
    I don’t think a hospital is in a position to make a judgment about the welfare of the kids who leave…only their medical condition.
    My guess? Sure the hospital will let them go…but Children’s Services will be waiting on the doorstep…

  20. boomchakaboom says:

    All future items about this woman MUST BE CONSORED. Please, for the love of puppies, never mention this woman’s name and porn together, as in to-GETHER, again. Ever.

    Even if the unthinkable happens, just DON’T MENTION IT and we can all pretend it doesn’t exist. I prefer to think the possibility doesn’t exist, thankyouverymuch.

  21. boomchakaboom says:

    I feel for her kids, all of them. For the older ones this must be hell.

  22. Ana says:

    Gawd this woman. pleez someone come forward and debunk this whole porn project. seriously, who would actually pay to watch her and the sperm donor swap body fluids? I, like boomchakaboom, truly feel for this kids. I can’t imagine how the one kid that has the separation anxiety is gonna cope when those babies come how.

  23. CB Rawks says:

    Thank god the hospital can prevent her taking them! There’s a much better chance social services will rescue them instead.

  24. Shannon says:

    Again, I know I’m in the minority, but I think the hospital is overreaching its authority. No one can make a determination about the welfare of the children if the children aren’t in her possession.

    As for the family home that hasn’t been decided yet. The house is in foreclosure, but as it is she still has a home. Until she doesn’t have one then everyone, including FPS, should wait to make a decision. Who knows? She might win the lottery and pay off the back mortgage…anything could happen! LOL…she could do porn!

    Point is a lot of folks are taking preemptive action that is shady and IMO illegal.

  25. CB Rawks says:

    There has to be a plan in place for their care and a safe permanent residence. She has to make assurances of that, first.
    That is not over-reaching by the authorites. That is them doing their job to protect the innocent babies.
    And we know she can’t succeed all by herself, so part of the plan has to be proof of all the caregivers enlisted, as well as the home the babies will be in.

  26. CB Rawks says:

    authorities

  27. Faye says:

    Shannon, Put them in her home til she prooves she can’t take care of them, And what is that situation going to entail? seriously? make sure she has the means to take PROPERLY for these 8 innocent babies before the hospital let’s them go anywhere…at least they have the power not to release them..thank god… and re: the porn offer lol, that would put another messed up ingredient in this bullshit stew

  28. nanster says:

    I agree, CB Rawks. Precautionary measures have to be taken before anyone thinks of sending those babies home. To send them “home” to the unknown is unethical and just plain dangerous. Premature infants have special needs and can “turn for the worse” very quickly. With so many children to care for, no one may notice a grave situation until it is too late for one of these babies. I can see no good coming of this situation.

  29. Roma says:

    Seriously, who would watch a porn with a woman who gave birth to 14 children? It’d be like throwing a hot dog down a hallway.

  30. Could you even fit 8 car seats in a mini-van? Or would she have to make multiple trips?

  31. Christina says:

    that’s really gross… the porn industry has no decency… she’s got enough problems without the addition of porn into the mixture… i hope she doesn’t take it…

  32. boomchakaboom says:

    Christina: no, the porn industry is not where you find decency.

  33. Dan says:

    i really hope she doesn’t do this, not because of what people are saying “eww don’t wanna see her do that!” but because this particular offer to her smacks of exploitation. i just hope she finds some other means of supporting those kids.

  34. Jill says:

    good question, pirate. plus the other 6 probably still need booster seats. she’ll have to get a bus.

  35. paul fetchr says:

    i would watch it if she made a video 🙂

  36. Angelll70 says:

    Thank god the hospital can prevent her taking them! There’s a much better chance social services will rescue them instead.