Jennifer Aniston on her divorce from Brad Pitt: ‘Nobody did anything wrong’

aniston3

The Hollywood Reporter released their cover story on Jennifer Aniston, and good lord… who knew that there was still stuff to learn about Jennifer? Who knew that we would still have to get in some quotes about babies, Justin, Brad and her mother at this point? Perhaps I’m dating myself (I’m so old), but this THR piece reminded me so strongly of her 2005 Vanity Fair interview. Like, Jennifer was about to cry throughout the interview or scream at the ocean. I wouldn’t go so far as to say she’s a depressive (she’s not), but I do think she wallows in the bad stuff. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:

The divorce from Brad Pitt: “We’re not in daily communication. But we wish nothing but wonderful things for each other. Nobody did anything wrong. You know what I mean? It was just like, sometimes things [happen]. If the world only could just stop with the stupid, soap-opera bullsh-t. There’s no story. I mean, at this point it’s starting to become — please, give more credit to these human beings.”

On her wedding plans with Justin: “We don’t have a date. I wouldn’t tell you if we did.”

The possibility of kids: “Listen, that’s a topic that’s so exhausted. I get nervous around that, just because it’s very personal. Who knows if it’s going to happen? It’s been a want. We’re doing our best.”

Learning to deal with anger: “I always thought, if you’re angry you just don’t say anything. I would come out passive, things would come out passively. But it doesn’t have to be black or white. You don’t have to be a hysterical human being and have veins popping out of your neck and turn bright red and terrify people — or else keep quiet and put your head in the sand. I used to loathe confrontation. Loathe it. It was absolute. I understood anger, but I didn’t know that you should express it. Which has been something that I’ve really tried to work on.”

She loves the Dalai Lama: “But I’d love to meet him. From the things I’ve read about him, books and lectures, he seems like pure joy, pure, pure, pure enlightenment.”

Her heroes beyond the Dalai Lama: “They’re all dead now,” she observes wistfully, before citing Laurence Olivier, who died in 1989: “Honestly, I was obsessed [with him] when I was a kid. I just remember being so enamored of him. I remember thinking, ‘Maybe someday, if I become an actress, I’ll be able to work with him.’ And I remember the day he died, crying my eyes out.”

What drew her to Justin: “It was his humor, mainly. He’s the easiest guy to hang around. He was so completely in his skin. It was the first time I remember being so comfortable [with a romantic interest], like with all my gay friends.”

She watches some bad TV: “And then there’s junk television,” she says, smiling, noting she’s hooked on The Bachelor. “I’ll say it out loud. Last year, [friends] were saying, ‘It’s The Bachelor, it’s premiering tonight! The Bachelor is premiering tonight!’ And I was like, ‘Oh, guys! Seriously? The Bachelor? That’s been on for 15 years or something.’ And Justin and I, just for fun, watched — and two hours later, we were addicted. It was like junk food. We were sad when it ended.”

Being diagnosed with dyslexia in her early 20s: “The only reason I knew [that I had it] was because I went to get a prescription for glasses. I had to wear these Buddy Holly glasses. One had a blue lens and one had a red lens. And I had to read a paragraph, and they gave me a quiz, gave me 10 questions based on what I’d just read, and I think I got three right. Then they put a computer on my eyes, showing where my eyes went when I read. My eyes would jump four words and go back two words, and I also had a little bit of a lazy eye, like a crossed eye, which they always have to correct in photos.” The revelation that she had dyslexia was life-changing. Until then, “I thought I wasn’t smart. I just couldn’t retain anything,” she says. “Now I had this great discovery. I felt like all of my childhood trauma-dies, tragedies, dramas were explained.”

Her mother: “She was critical. She was very critical of me. Because she was a model, she was gorgeous, stunning. I wasn’t. I never was. I honestly still don’t think of myself in that sort of light, which is fine. She was also very unforgiving. She would hold grudges that I just found so petty.” Aniston herself claims to hold no grudges and is forgiving “probably to a fault.”

Her future: “There’s something bigger I’m interested in doing. It could be more work, it could be more creativity, or getting more philanthropic in the world. It can look like a baby. It can look like a foundation. I know I have a bigger purpose. It’s a puzzle, and I haven’t quite put the puzzle together. But something greater is calling out to me.”

[From The Hollywood Reporter]

Am I hallucinating or does this not remind you of her VF piece a decade ago? Anyway, there’s a lot more in the interview, but I ran out of space. She talks a lot about physical pain, dealing with a pinched nerve, CAKE, anger, all of that stuff. Honestly, the thing that stuck out to me is her description of her mother and Aniston’s lack of self-awareness when it comes to how she actually is like her mom. We never want to admit that, do we? Daughters never want to admit that they’re like their mothers. We think we’re doing everything so differently, then WHAM, you’re the same angry, grudge-holding, unforgiving piece of work.

aniston2

Photos courtesy of The Hollywood Reporter.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

257 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston on her divorce from Brad Pitt: ‘Nobody did anything wrong’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Birdie says:

    Lovely pictures. Didn’t know about her dyslexia.

    • Mmhmm says:

      Yeah I like these pics. Also, I actually like a lot of this interview (even though she does seem to wallow some, but I always give interviews a benefit of a doubt. Stuff always looks worse on paper than when said in person).

    • Josephine says:

      The one where she is fully facing the camera should have been the cover – it is a terrific pic of her.

    • Kiddo says:

      Pix are nice.

    • Esmom says:

      Love the photos, too. And actually the way she describes her dyslexia revelation/diagnosis sounds so much like a friend’s experience, so I tend to believe it. And I can relate to her comments about anger, I really hold everything in and avoid confrontation at all costs. I know it’s not healthy but it’s a hard habit/mindset to change.

    • k says:

      whatever that piece of lingerie (?) she is wearing in the messy hair, facing front pic…i would like that id’d. that is sweet.
      and this broad is gorgeous. just gorgeous.

      • Lady D says:

        I’d like to find out what it is too. I really like it.

      • LAR says:

        Yes, it looks gorgeous.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        Moi aussi. Can anyone ID it? Feels like a must-have. I know my old man would be grateful. (No, not because HE wants to wear it. Well, I’m pretty sure of that.)

      • coreidae says:

        It looks like La Perla’s Graphique Couture bustier. I’m not sure if it’s ok to post links (I’m new here) but you can search for it based on that name. It’s beautiful but really pricey- $800 some dollars.

    • muggsby says:

      Bingo Kaiser on this head case. She’s her mother. Only much less remorseful. Her mother’s book that she ultimately wrote after not speaking with her for 5 years, was heartbreaking. The fact that no one discusses it or brings it up to her shows you how locked down her pr has her game. Low bar. Never held accountable for anything.

  2. Reed says:

    Talking about Brangelina again. Smh.

    • crab says:

      Well maybe she was asked a question about it! I mean interviewers ask the stupidest questions, you can’t blame it on the interviewee! She looks absoultely gorgeous in those pics!

      • LAK says:

        Even IF the journalist inserted the questions cheekily, Jen Aniston has copy approval.

        That means she approves the questions (or topics) to be asked AND she approves the article before it goes to print.

        She shares a rep with other A list actresses who are never asked these questions because they don’t approve them, and remove them from the article before it goes to print.

        It isn’t an accident that these topics and questions show up in Jen Aniston’s interviews. THIS is what she wants to talk about. Just like those other actresses choose to discuss other things except their own lives.

        She needs to copy her stable mates’ PR strategies. Her own is not good.

      • Birdie says:

        You can actually say before the interview that you don’t want any questions regarding certain topics.

      • Helen says:

        But why shouldn’t she answer the question? What is wrong with answering a question honestly, about something people have been questioning for 10 years?
        Maybe it is a way to get everyone to move on finally.
        If you refuse to answer people will continue to speculate.

      • LAK says:

        Helen: many celebrities refuse to answer those questions no matter the speculation. If they don’t answer them, the speculation dies down, and the celebrity can get on with their life.

        Look at Kristen Stewart. Yes the gossip media/twihards brings it up, she does not. Her interviews are now exclusively about her work. Rarely about her celebrity, how bored she is, her life as they used to be pre-mini coopering.

        More people are talking about her work than the fact of those pictures.

        Reece Witherspoon has everyone discussing her work, her change of direction from being america’s sweetheart, instead of her arrest which revealed her to be unpleasant.

        Sandra Bullock never entertained questions about her divorce from Jesse James, and she was definitely a woman wronged, repeatedly.

      • perplexed says:

        Those women wound up in really embarrassing spots. I think it’s clearer in their cases as to why they would definitely not entertain questions about being caught in a Mini-Cooper having sex with a married man, drunkenly screaming at a police officer to know who you are just because you’re a famous American citizen, or even in Bullock’s case, despite being the wronged party, not answering questions as to why she married someone who has a tendency towards flipping off Nazi salutes in photos. The doors to those conversations and anything else that could spring out from them really needed to be shut down.

        I would probably advise Aniston not to discuss the divorce at all, but Aniston’s situation is different in that she doesn’t really have anything to be embarrassed about in answering questions about her divorce (well, other than people thinking she’s Lonely Jen who wouldn’t have Brad Pitt’s babies, I guess). In the case of Bullock and Witherspoon, I think to some degree they were also able to learn from Aniston’s Vanity Fair profile since their public disasters came after hers. Kristen Stewart’s situation — uh, yeah, I can see why she wouldn’t answer questions about that. Who would really want to? Ick.

      • Amanda says:

        JUST because she was asked a question, doesn’t mean she HAS to ANSWER it. Her publicist vets the questions, so clearly Aniston wants to be asked the questions. I wish people would stop doing backflips to excuse her.
        Perplexed, you don’t think hiring Chelsea Handler to attack your ex-husband’s partner and then going onto cheat with Chris Gartin, a married man, and then breaking up a 14 year relationship by stealing Justin from Heidi isn’t ’embarrassing’? I think those 3 things are a darn sight more embarrassing than some fleeting run in with a police due to your husband’s behaviour. I honestly do.

      • perplexed says:

        I’m talking within the context of her divorce and the question of what questions celebrities will or will not entertain – isn’t that what everyone was originally talking about? Within the context of the original triangle, she wasn’t photographed having sex with someone in a Mini-Cooper. So, no, I don’t think she did anything embarrassing at the level of, say, Kristen Stewart, which she would be more likely to be shy about answering questions. I haven’t followed every single thing Aniston has done after the triangle, but am aware of the “big things” in her life that get covered more deeply by the media, and within the context of the Angelina/Brad/Jennifer thing which everybody in the media seems obsessed with, I didn’t notice anything embarrassing from her that is parallel to Reese Witherspoon screaming drunkenly at a police officer.

        I don’t even know who Chris Gartin is. I know who Kristen Stewart is, and I know she has a Mini-Cooper because that scandal blew up big (though I can barely remember the name of the director), and I know who Sandra Bullock’s ex-husband is because she thanked him profusely in her Oscar speeches, and when Reese Witherspoon drunkenly screams “Do you know who I am?” I can answer that I certainly do, but I have no clue who Chris Gartin is. Unless the media alerts me on who that is in the way they’ve made sure I know who Brad Pitt is, I suspect I’ll remain clueless.

    • Say What!? says:

      And Brad talked about their marriage and that time in his life while promoting Killing Them Softly AND World War Z.

      • He talked about his marriage first in Parade (which was the dead end comments), then further apologized for it (this was for that baseball movie) and then his make up artist said that htey were friends for his Esquire interview (which was for WWZ, I think)…..where in Killing Them Softly? I only remember he had a PEOPLE cover where he talked about that the time was nigh for them to get married.

      • Say What!? says:

        @ Tasha Whether it was Moneyball or Killing them Softly, what’s the difference? The reality is he continues to trash that time in his life.

        @ Virgilia Aniston hasn’t said one word in five or six years until a few weeks ago. And keep in mind ALL of her comments have been nice. There’s no need to apologize to anyone when you’re praising your ex and wishing him well.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Say What!?, who wrote: “And Brad talked about their marriage and that time in his life while promoting Killing Them Softly AND World War Z.”

        Brad Pitt did a “Parade” interview in which he talked about how ‘he’ felt when ‘he’ was married. Not once did he say “We” or “She made me feel” or “I wasn’t happy with Jen” … he said he wasn’t happy with ‘himself’ before and during his marriage. It was a statement about ‘self growth.’ If anything, it put ‘him’ in a bad light, not Jen.

        He didn’t apologize because he actually said anything bad about Jennifer Aniston in his “Parade” interview. He apologized because her fans went ballistic and then Jen did that passive-aggressive thing, so the man did another interview in which he apologized for the ‘misconception’ that he was talking about his ex-wife during his interview.

        @Say What!?, who wrote: “@ Virgilia Aniston hasn’t said one word in five or six years until a few weeks ago. And keep in mind ALL of her comments have been nice.”

        That is SO not true.

      • Amanda says:

        Say What!? He “continues”? That is a blatant untruth. Twice in 10 years (one of them to call her a sweetheart) is ‘continuing’? He has never ever said a word to trash that time. Never. You are projecting Aniston’s behaviour onto him. And in “five or six years”? So how do you explain the “5 years after Brad” spread, given the split only just turned 10 years old on January 7 of THIS YEAR? 6 from 10 is 4, right? So how do you explain the FIVE years after Brad spread? Or is it just a case of you lying? Also the GQ interview that was 3 years ago where she talked about Brad and talked about carrying twins on each hip? Or the interview 2 years ago where she said and I quote “my 30s sucked”. And then there were at least 4 others between them. When you are praising your ex, there is no need to continually make snarky comments about the mother of his children, is there? That is what she has done non-stop for 10 years. That’s what Google shows. Google is a handy thing. Try it. You will see that Aniston has NOT SHUT UP for TEN YEARS. Brad made 2 (TWO) comments. in 10 years. She has commented almost every interview she has done; print, audio and tv. That’s around 147 she has done. Brad – a grand total of: TWO.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      What about her saying “Brad was missing a Sensitivity Chip”
      …and saying Angelina “uncool” for talking about enjoying getting to the set each day of Mr.& Mrs Smith.

    • Maria says:

      Yeah, she talked about them, and?

      She wasn’t disrespectful or crass, she’s basically saying that people need to let it go, she has.

      • Amanda says:

        If she had let it go, she wouldn’t still be talking about it 10 years later, Maria. Its clear as day that she is not over Brad.

  3. spaniard says:

    Again? Same topics? Does this means that she doesn’t have anything else to talk about? How sad. On the other hand she looks espectacular in this pics, legs to die for.

  4. GingerCrunch says:

    ffs…don’t these people ever get tired of talking about themselves?????

    • LB says:

      Nope. To be fair, their whole job is to sell themselves to the public. But at some point, you would think they’d get sick of talking about the same things (the media brings up over and over) and trying to make it sound new.

      In other news, her legs… Sigh I need to start working out again.

    • MrsBPitt says:

      No, no they don’t! Most actors think the sun rises and sets for them alone…me, me, me, I, I, I….it is really disgusting!

      • enike says:

        GingerCrunch and MrsBPitt
        don´t you ever get tired of clicking on these articles and what more, commenting?
        ach.. och… hollywood stars are full of themselves and it is really disgusting! what a shock! it is a first time this ever happened and you naively clicked on the link!

        Here you go:)

    • Say What!? says:

      I think this begs the question “doesn’t the public get tired of reading these interviews and then commenting on them endlessly?” It’s pretty clear the answer to that is a big fat NO.

    • Nicolette says:

      No, they all suffer from the same disease. Acute narcissism.

    • perplexed says:

      I put more blame on the media for talking to them though.

      George Clooney annoys me for reasons I can’t even rationalize properly , but in the end it’s the media that asks him questions and he’s doing his job for his movie people by answering them (and talking about himself. Though, to be fair, I don’t really want to hear his opinions on world peace or anything, since he sounds even more irritating when he stops talking about himself and starts talking about issues outside of Hollywood. So what’s left to talk about? Him, Amal, his newsman father, and his pet pig).

  5. HoneyBea says:

    …and 10 years later…

    • lisa2 says:

      I saw the best comment on another site.. said something about this being her 10 years after Brad interview..

      so yes for those of us that knew it was coming.. here it is. She has sat back and allowed these two people to be attacked for years. Now she is done so let’s all move on. Her fans are still making excuses. I guess it is hard to accept you have been used for years as her weapon of choice

      • Say What!? says:

        And Pitt has spent years allowing his fans to attack her while he was busy whining about how boring his life was back then.

      • lisa2 says:

        Honey you can say whatever you want and spin it however you want.. I have never called her a who*e. Never attacked her in that way. I don’t have pages of attacks about her. I’m not a fan, but I have never ever called her a filthy name. So you may want to slow your roll in your defense and criticism of B/A’s fans. I think Brad talking about his life at that point is nowhere the level of her attacks for 10. Fans like you got mad because he told his truth about how he felt. She has talked about her life right after the divorce. He spoke what 5 years later.. PLEASE.

      • Say What!? says:

        Lisa2 Pitt was the first to ever talk about any of this. He went on and on about it in 2005. Aniston finally broke her silence months later in Vanity Fair interview her haters STILL whine about. And Pitt has talked about it several times since then about how it was a dead end and there was no dastardly affair and how his life was so meaningless back then.

        It’s just that when he talks about it his fans think it’s totally OK. He’s allowed to talk about it because he’s “just answering the reporters question of he is speaking the truth”. As if you knew whether he is speaking he truth or not. He has never once said to his fans “hey, it’s been ten years stop trashing Jen day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.

        They ALL want to keep is drama alive in one form or another or they would have shut up about it and would have told everyone else to shut about it too.

        And we should probably thank them. Otherwise what we have been yapping on about all of these years?

      • Amanda says:

        Absolutely wrong. Aniston was the first to mention it in the Vanity Fair interview. He has NOT mentioned it ‘several’ times, that is a blatant lie. Aniston has mentioned it non-stop for 10 years, Brad has made exactly two comments. I wish people would just leave Brad and Angelina alone and stop bashing them every day, every week, every year for 10 years. Despite what he was put through, Brad has never said one bad word about Jen. He and Angelina have acted with class, respect and dignity and decency at all times. If Jen had, this wouldn’t still be going on today.

      • Amanda says:

        Pitt has never allowed anyone to attack anyone. He made one comment about how HE was boring. Unlike Aniston who said Brad wasn’t the love of her life, her marriage was a merger, her 30s “sucked” etc etc. She has never ever shut up with her attacks. And unlike Aniston who actively encouraged people to attack Angelina and their children.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        She clearly attacked Brad, saying He was missing a sensitivity chip.
        She also called Angelina “uncool” in one interview.

        I have always liked JennA, but lately she has become utterly annoying, from the push for a Oscar nomination being so obvious, to her talking about a ex who died, to now this …she is just annoying lately, to me anyway. It took me ten years to find her annoying… LOL.

  6. Lindy79 says:

    I love the styling on this shoot, I’m not even sure why.

    • I love it too–this one and her Harper’s Bazaar shoot were probably the best one’s I’ve ever seen her in. I don’t know why the GQ one–where she’s laying over a bunch of naked dudes, only wearing a tie is so great. They f-cked up her face with photoshop. She looks plastic.

    • Cecada says:

      I have to admit, she looks amazing.

      • MrsBPitt says:

        umm…its called photoshop!

      • Jem says:

        Well, then, the Photoshop is amazing

      • FLORC says:

        Haha!
        It’s expected. The photoshop is well done here. She looks like a younger version of herself, but a better younger version.

        Well, i’m glad she’s not speaking out of both sides of her moth on this and addressing it in full. She’s over it! *applause* Now if we can relay that to everyone in deep debate on who spoke about who’s marriage/divorce first (over a decade ago) this can really end.
        Oh Aniston. How difficult it is to unring that bell when you’ve been swinging from it for years.
        IMO if she really is over this pr tactic she’ll talk about it for a minute more and then never address it again. Instead she will marry Justin in a private beach ceremony and start her life anew. Photos by Uncle Terry.

  7. Bea says:

    At this point, with all she has said about Theroux, he has to be staying for the check. Because dude? She has emasculated you at every turn and you will always be in her ex-husband’s shadow.

    And you wonder why the triangle will never go away. She will never let it.

    • Toot says:

      Yep, no need to talk about Brad after 10 YEARS, but she has nothing else it seems.

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        So thoroughly agree. And if I’m correct, Jen talked with VF first about her divorce. How she didn’t want it, how she wanted to work on the marriage. Well, here it is 10 years later, and guess what? Same exact thing. And again, she is making a fool out of Justin. But hey! He allows it. So go to it.

    • Janet says:

      For the life of me I can’t understand why Justin is still around. Any man with any self-respect would have bailed a long time ago.

      • epiphany says:

        I have a hunch – don’t ask me why, I’m not basing it on any one thing, but I suspect these 2 are actually no longer together, had an amicable split, and because they remain friends, he’s agreed to escort her through award season. Remember, the interviews we’re reading now were done months ago. I could be wrong I think we may get a press release some time in the next couple of months (discreetly) announcing their break up.

        She looks very pretty in the photos. There’s obviously some Photoshop involved, but it’s effective, and not overly done. Aniston is not a beautiful woman, but with the right styling she can look really good.

  8. Louise177 says:

    Clearly Jennifer thought she was going to be an Oscar nominee. Since her engagement Jennifer has barely talked about Brad and the divorce. No she can’t shut up about him. Also she keeps bringing up new info – deceased boyfriend, dyslexia, etc.

    • Bridget says:

      This cover and photo shoot were lined up way before the Oscar nominations were announced – this was clearly supposed to be a triumphant story about her Oscar nom and her career turn. With no nom they had to switch the headline, and here we are with this new narrative. You have to hand it to Aniston: she’s selling this snub like a pro. And those pictures really are fab.

    • Caz says:

      Methinks you are correct, Louise & Bridget. Huvane has absolutely nowhere to go with her now, PR angle-wise. She must be paying him a fortune.

  9. Toot says:

    Yep, she’s just like her bitter grudge holding mother.

    As for what she said about her marriage, she should have said something this clear years ago, but too late now her fans believe otherwise and she let them. Jennifer sounds like she has a lot of issues.

  10. bette says:

    Wait–didn’t she state in an interview last week that she was tired of talking about Brad, having babies (which she correctly stated was an impossiblity at her age), and the whole last 10 years? Why is she bringing it up again then, or answering these questions again in an interview.

    She’s like a record that keeps skipping and repeating the same part (sorry if some of you youngsters don’t get the reference!)

    • eva says:

      For someone who doesn’t want to talk about her ex husband she spends alot of time talking about her ex husband.

    • Cecada says:

      And we know she has control over what questions are asked, so she wanted those questions asked, right? So that she could insist she doens’t want those questions asked… Very manipulative. Or crazy. Maybe both.

    • Cecada says:

      And yes I am old enough to have experienced a skipping record. ALOT.

    • Anna says:

      Children are not an impossibility at her age. Friends of mine have had them at her age, perfectly handsome, beautiful and healthy.

  11. perplexed says:

    I think she has some depressive tendencies (and wonder if she’s ever been diagnosed — maybe she’s considered too high-functioning to get that diagnosis), but I don’t see her as being similar to her mom. Her mom seems to have a different set of issues. I’m actually surprised she made up with her mom, because I most likely wouldn’t have if my mom called me ugly when I was a kid and ran to a tabloid to talk about me. Her mom sounds rather screwed-up to me, whereas I think Aniston can get by with some degree of emotional intelligence in the real world (I mean, she can get along with Paltrow who called her “That tv girl”. Yeah, I’d hold a grudge about that. I’m petty like that).

    • Jessica says:

      Yeah, her mom always came off as an absolute nightmare. There was a time she was actively trying to derail her daughters career for a few days of publicity and a little bit of money. Cutting someone like that out of your life doesn’t make you petty or mean your holding a grudge, it’s basic self-preservation. If she’s let the woman back into her life in any capacity then she’s exactly what she says she is; too forgiving.

    • laura in LA says:

      Poor Jen, her mom’s clearly a narcissist. And Jen may be…histrionic?

      • perplexed says:

        I think Halle Berry seems like more of a histrionic personality (based on how she deals with men in her personal life). I don’t know what Jen is — I sense kind of melancholy in her … but more subdued or something. But the melancholy seems more clinical rather than attached to any particular event (i.e divorce) or person (i.e Brad Pitt). Maybe that’s why she exercises so much — perhaps it’s a coping mechanism.

      • laura in LA says:

        Halle seems more like a borderline personality to me, but what do I know – that’s just what I’ve read.

    • Janie says:

      Perplexed, Jen had no reason to turn against her mother. No reason at all. She was tricked when she did Hard Copy. The interview was supposed to be about Nancy’s upcoming projects, but all the interviewers wanted to discuss was their daughter. When the show aired, most of the stuff about Nancy’s own projects were edited out. Jen was furious that it was all about her (she should have been flattered) and Nancy tried to EXPLAIN. I mean, Jen should know what the media is like, so she should have given her own mother the benefit of the doubt. But she wouldn’t. Therefore, Nancy was left with no choice to use her book as a right of reply – as a REBUTTAL. And I don’t think any of us should blame her for that, since it was her only way to get her side across. She was left with no choice. I honestly think Jen was lucky her mother even said nice things about her in the book. I wouldn’t have been so nice if my daughter turned on me over nothing but a misunderstanding and acted like a stubborn petulant spoiled brat.

  12. pwal says:

    Interesting, what with the public decrees of missing sensitive chip and being uncool.

  13. Jade says:

    While I suspect Brad fell for Angie while he was married, I’ve read that Courtney Cox said there was no affair. Hearing JA say nobody did anything wrong will hopefully end all these triangle speculations. I love Angie but I think Jennifer is easy to watch onscreen and has other strengths so I hope some fans can just lay off attacking both women senselessly and make it into two camps. Maybe she is receiving better PR direction to bury her tabloid image, maybe some can claim she is still feeding it by approving all her interview questions, but I will give her the benefit of the doubt for now.

    • She said Brad didn’t do anything wrong back in 2008…in the same interview when she called Angelina “uncool”. She said something like they had decided, together, to separate, that they talked about everything and *no one* made them not discuss a subject, and that their relationship was better for it–they were so much more respectful of each other.

      • GoOnGirl! says:

        When it suited her, Aniston conveniently forgot she had said Brad was not to blame. By keeping silent, she actually made it seem like Brad did cheat. And, out of all this whole sordid, sorry mess, Angie is the one who got thrown under the bus and tossed to the curb. Jen could have fixed this 10 years ago. Now it serves her purpose because she thought an Oscar nom was coming. Please, please just go away.

      • daughterofjean says:

        It wasn’t up to Jen to defend Angelina. It should have been Pitt manning up.

      • Amanda says:

        It also wasn’t up to Jennifer to smear Angelina and incite a vendetta.

  14. Amcn says:

    Second verse, same as the first. It is a shame she and Olivier will never get to work together. Maybe it can be digitized somehow? Please?

  15. BNA FAN says:

    Isn’t it sad it took JA ten years to say no one didn’t do anything wrong. I remember about ten years ago Courtney Cox saying Brad did not cheat and he told JA he was attracted to Angelina but did not cheat. Jennifer is a master manipulator, with passive aggressive behavior and anger issues, Ect according to her THR interview. I like how JA continues to talk about Brad and Angelina to change the conversation and stop people from talking about about her dead BF letter from his wife calling out Jennifer Aniston for being not truthful. Good job Jennifer.

    • Eweng says:

      EXACTLY!!!!bring on the dead boyfriend.

    • norah says:

      also since when is the hollywood reporter turning into another tabloid – it thought they wd be more focused on the job rather than the same recycled interview she has done so many times before. it is like a people interview now

  16. DenG says:

    So many questions here. Babies are “a want”? I thought she was done with baby talk. She doesn’t think she’s gorgeous? Hunty, please. Childhood tragedies, dramas? Forgiving to a fault? Philanthropic work? Bizarro World. I still remember a post-award interview when she spoke to the camera and thanked Brad. “You hold me together, literally”. Always wondered what she meant.

  17. truthSF says:

    Yeah, the fact that she doesn’t realize that she’s Just like her mom at 46 is what scary.

    • I fully admit it—I am JUST like my mom. With less cursing and drinking–we’ll definitely have to work on that. But besides some meaningless differences, we are totally the same. My dad even knows it, lol.

      But yeah–I wouldn’t be snarking on her if she hadn’t been going on about how she’s a totally forgiving person and just let’s things go. But she’s STILL talking shit about her mother. Now I’m not saying that she’s wrong about that–but guess what? When you say you’ve forgiven someone (like Jennifer said she had 10 years ago), it’s kinda of counterproductive to talk shit about them, amirite? It doesn’t really seem like they have much of a relationship.

      • Lucinda says:

        I’m giving her a pass on her mother. We don’t know anything about that relationship or the dynamics. My mother is abusive. I forgave her a long time ago but that didn’t mean I stopped talking about how terrible she is. Many people who know me had no idea what I went through as a kid and we don’t know with Jen. So yes, she can forgive her and still talk shit about her.

      • But should she do that in a public magazine, when she’s said that she and her mother have moved on, previously? I’m not saying she’s wrong in what she’s saying or how she feels, but it’s odd that she’s said in the past that after she got divorced, she and her mother reconnected and became friendly again, but still talks like they are estranged.

        And I don’t think it’s wrong to talk shit, when your mother was like that, even AFTER you made up–to your girlfriends, your friends. But I definitely wouldn’t say it publicly. I feel a degree of friendship and “togetherness” on this site–which makes me feel comfortable to talk about personal things on here. But beyond this site, family, and a few friends, I don’t constantly broadcast my personal stuff.

        And I guess, to me at least, there’s a degree of not moving on. This is the same old stuff…I guess I don’t understand how it’s relevant–she didn’t make it relevant. I wish the interview would’ve been more about what she’s going to do next. She has nothing on the pipelines for this year. Is she looking, or is she going to take a break?

      • Lucinda says:

        I think there is an assumption here that after they “moved on” mom never went back to her old tricks. You can reconcile and move on and then end up right back where you were if the awful person now feels like they have done what was necessary to repair the relationship and can go back to who they really are which is awful. It doesn’t really move forward. It is just circular and will remain so until one person makes a permanent change. Unfortunately, that permanent change is sometimes walking away completely, knowing you are going to have people constantly suggest you reconcile with your parent because somehow you will regret not going back to that cycle of abuse. That’s why I don’t assume moving on is a permanent state.

        As for talking about it in public, why not? Shouldn’t we be honest about abuse and how it works? How do we know her mother doesn’t bad mouth her constantly. Again, there is an assumption that the mother somehow deserves some level of respect just because she is the mother and she is old. That isn’t necessarily true.

        And maybe Jen is just being a jerk. That’s a possibility too, especially with her history of playing victim. But having had too much experience with that cycle of abuse from a parent,, I am giving her a pass on this one.

      • chaser says:

        I’ve moved on and forgiven my dad for being a piece of work but that doesn’t mean I forget about being hurt in the past. It means that I have a relationship with him with boundaries that recognises that he has issues and I try to prevent those issues from hurting me again. I can only enforce those boundaries by being honest about the past and not sweeping it under the rug, for either of us.

      • muggsby says:

        Guess what? I’ll say it. I’ll break the code of always hiving enabling coddling support to poor invalid jen and lowering the bar just for her….her mother is the sympathetic character in this piece…and aniston is far worse than her mother…read the moms book (only written after her daughter had frozen her out for years and didn’t invite her to her wedding )…the mother comes across as a heartbroken woman.

  18. LAK says:

    Oh Jen, LET IT GO……..L-E-T I-T G-O…..something, something…LET IT GO!!!

  19. Maya says:

    And here we have from the person directly.

    Brad never cheated with Angelina – Jennifer said that 10 years ago alongside her then BFF Courteney Cox. And she is saying it again. Maybe now the Jenhens will stop calling Angelina a homewrecker or better yet Chelsea might offer Angelina an apology.

    Jennifer also admitted to what we have been saying for years – she has anger issues, control freak and more importantly she is passive agressive.

    Jennifer has also proven herself to be a liar when it comes to Justin – she keeps changing her story of how she met him. It’s like The Joker from the dark night – who told various of stories of how he got the scar around his mouth and yet we don’t know which story is the truth. Same with Jennifer and Justin – when and where did they meet?

    Jennifer said last week she is tired of talking about Brad and Angelina & babies – she didn’t even last a whole week.

    PS: way to throw your mother under the bus Jennifer. You refused to talk to her for almost a decade because she wrote a few lines about you in her book. Well here – you are brutally putting her down and yet claim to be friendly with her.

    I really would never be with a person like Jennifer – she threw Brad, Justin, his mother, Courteney Cox under the bus and now it’s her mother’s turn. Who will be next? Huvane?

    PPS: despite the photoshop Jennifer looks good her.

    • Charlie says:

      I don’t think it was Angelina’s fault, but I do thing Brad was the “bad” guy. Maybe not in the split, but in the way after the split both women took the blame and he got completely of the hook.

      • But guys getting off the hook is the tabloid standard, when there are three celebs involved, and two are women. Unless you think that he should’ve issued a press release about every single sexist tabloid article that came out, then I don’t see what he could’ve done differently. He said before he even publicly got with Angelina, that the rumors that Jennifer refused to give him a baby were BS and untrue. I don’t think he ever mentioned anything about why exactly they split, except to say that the marriage was a dead end, and that he was a horrible husband. He never said anything about how much better Angelina was compared to Jennifer. He even defended Jennifer about her ‘uncool’ remarks.

      • perplexed says:

        Prince Charles didn’t get off the hook for his infidelity. But he’s not as good-looking as Brad Pitt.

      • Amanda says:

        Prince Charles actually committed infidelity. Brad didn’t. Bad analogy perplexed.

      • perplexed says:

        I was responding to the comment about the tabloid narrative about guys getting off the hook, though, not trying to compare emotional infidelity (which at the very least seems to have happened with Brad and I don’t think even he could deny if we go by the timeline which is probably why he doesn’t touch the issue) with physical infidelity. I don’t know what Brad did or did not do physically with Angelina, because he’s never going to tell us the full story (and I think it would probably be unwise to), but Charles was being roasted way before we heard it from his mouth that he actually did commit physical infidelity after the emotional infidelity of being in love with Camilla while being married to Diana. Before he confirmed it, we could only speculate and go by Andrew Morton’s book, which at that time nobody had idea any who was giving the info to make the book possible. And I don’t remember Charles getting off the hook before the actual confirmation occurred. People thought he was a scumbag way before the confirmation came out, but then again he’s not hot, so…

      • carol says:

        I so agree with @charlie. Why isn’t Brad dragged into the so-called Angelina/Jolie “feud”? He was the one who may have cheated. He was the one who decided to do the “family” spread with Angelina in W magazine just a short time after he split from Aniston. I hate when women are seen as the evil one in a relationship break up but the guy just skims by unscathed. Look at the douchey Eddie Cibrian. Ugh, annoying.

  20. Dani L. says:

    Ugh she is so boring and repetitive. Not to mention desperate. Brad, kids, and Justin are all she talk about, and in that order.

    • Amcn says:

      You’re not being fair. She’ll also throw in hair, exercise, Aveeno and Smartwater. If she really wants to be zany she’ll give a smoothie recipe.

    • GoOnGirl! says:

      Let’s not leave out the hair, diet, yoga, and water.

    • norah says:

      but i thought she just an interview recently that having babies was not who she was etc and now she once again brings up the subject – remember when she was all feminist etc – u can change your mind but then we are talking abt kids here being 100% sure of having kids is a major issue

  21. Jayna says:

    If she was forgiving to a fault, she would have had empathy and wouldn’t have criticized her 78-year-old mother in a fault-by-fault description in a national publication, thereby humiliating her mother. After this, I would assume they will go back to their estrangement.

    • Cecada says:

      She has to blame somebody, apparently. Now that she’s nothing but love to Brad and Angie (uh-huh, sure whatever) she has to turn it onto somebody else. Maybe that’s why they won’t marry: Justin has witnessed first hand the scorn this woman can harbor… too scared to marry her, too scared to walk away…

    • That’s what’s so weird. She said years ago that she and her mother had restarted their relationship again, and that it was great, etc. It would’ve been nice to hear about how they jumped over those hurdles, OR about what their relationship consists of now. People who are over the way their parent or anyone else treated them, don’t constantly bring it up. I ignore things like that. Or I accept the way that they are, and have the relationship for what it is.

      I’m taking care of my grandma right now–and there was a certain section of her life (when she was on a 5 year bender), that she said the only people that she gave a shit about were HER kid (my aunt) and HER grandkids (my aunt’s kids)….not me. I’m taking care of her now, and we have an okay relationship. I don’t know if she was just saying that because she was drunk or what, but I know about it, and it’s always in the back of my mind when she says “I love you.”…..but I certainly don’t bring it up. If I wanted to, then I wouldn’t be helping her out.

      • Amcn says:

        I fully agree with you. My mom had a very hard childhood, with a bitter and abusive mother. Someone who never gave me a second thought in my life. But now she is 83 and lives with my parents and they have moved on from the past and treat each other with respect and care. I always feel that the past was not forgiven just not spoken of out of respect.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        Sorry, Moderator … I posted in the wrong place.

    • meh says:

      I think it might be a little unfair to criticize her for that. Her mother sounds like she might have some tinges of a personality disorder and that can result in really toxic environments for children. If that’s the case it is probably something that shaped her as a person and have been a lifelong challenge of managing their relationship. Maybe she was just trying to be forthcoming about all of that.

      Although I certainly wouldn’t be so forthcoming about my mother’s issues in a big publication. On second thought, maybe this does deserve some side eye.

      • Lucinda says:

        I’m so glad you said this. As a society, and as demonstrated in the above comments, encourage reconciliation and blanket forgiveness without the offender ever being required to take responsibility and/or apologize. Forgiving them makes us “good people” even though there is an emotional price to pay as also evidenced by these comments. You reap what you sow. If you are an awful person to your child, your child is not required to reconcile and forgive. I’m giving Jen a complete pass on this one because we really know nothing about the dynamics of their relationship.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        Jen’s mother didn’t neglect Jen, she didn’t beat Jen, and she didn’t sexually abuse Jen … for me, those are the 3 BIG BADS that you walk away from forever, striking your parent’s name from the list of life mentally, emotionally, and physically. Otherwise, I don’t know how you can exclude your mother from your life–not inviting her to your wedding, not introducing her to your husband–for over 10 years. When her mother had the stroke, Jen made one PR trip to visit her in the hospital for 5 minutes and then hopped on a plane with Justin for NYC without a backwards glance.

        Jen keeps saying that her mother criticized her all the time, that her mother was tall and confident and beautiful … and Jen wasn’t. How much of that was Nancy telling Jen she wasn’t beautiful and how much was simply Jen deciding early on that she wasn’t beautiful? In her 2005 “Vanity Fair” ‘pity me, my man left me and done me wrong’ interview Jen admitted that she was insecure about marriage because of her parents breaking up, and that she brought some of that with her in her marriage to Brad. I’m wondering if her insecurities and feelings of being ‘short and ugly’ stems from the fact that her father left when she was 8 or 9. Perhaps she felt if she had been pretty he wouldn’t have left.

        This is no means an excuse for Nancy … I’m just saying that Jen might have issues that stem more from her own sense (or lack thereof) of self-esteem and self-image rather than everything stemming from her wicked, wicked mother.

        And to this day, not one person has printed the ‘horrible thing’ Jen’s mother wrote about her in that infamous book that would have caused Jen to cut off all ties for over a decade.

        This is strictly just my own opinion and musings.

      • perplexed says:

        Jon Voight didn’t get an invite to Angelina and Brad’s wedding. Didn’t he hear about it through the news? That didn’t bother me, so Aniston not inviting her mom to her wedding gets the same shrug reaction from . I think whatever is going on with their parents only they know the full story – we don’t. If they don’t want to invite their parents to their weddings, I’m not going to judge them for it.

      • Lucinda says:

        You are definitely entitled to your opinion and I respectfully disagree. My mother didn’t beat me as defined by the ’70’s when I grew up, she didn’t molest me, and we always had food and clothing. You can still make a person feel less than nothing with words alone. Parents have incredible power and my mother is no longer in my life because of those words and every person in my life wonders why it took me as long as I did.

        We just don’t know what that relationship is and unless you have experienced that kind of emotional abuse, it is hard to explain the incredible societal pressure to keep that person in your life because they somehow deserve it because of what? They gave birth to you? They did the minimum requirements of parenting which is to shelter, feed, and clothe you? I was constantly having to explain my mother to people because they just didn’t get it if they weren’t close to me. But my friends and husband witnessed it regularly.

        The arguments you give about Jen misinterpreting is what people would try to tell me all the time. My experiences and feelings were constantly dismissed as just a “mother-daughter” thing and it was so much more than that. I’m not saying Jen is right here. She could be totally wrong. I don’t know because I don’t know her mother. But I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt here.

        Yes, I’m projecting here. I won’t deny it. But I also want to put out there that there are other possibilities that are unbearable. Sometimes walking away is truly the healthiest thing you can do for yourself because it is really hard to grow as a person if your emotionally abusive family member is constantly pulling you back.

      • Josephine says:

        Even if your mom is a beast, as an adult you have to come to grips with that and recognize that your mom probably had many problems of her own. Life is too complex to be blaming bad parents at her age, and to do so in public. Part of becoming an adult is accepting that your parents were far from perfect, and that it’s up to you to form your adult life.

        I’m not a big fan of publicly bashing mom, even if she was lousy. To me it just shows a lack of maturity and judgment. I think there are things to like about Aniston, but her maturity level has always seemed very 20-something. Of course, I think that about many, many actors. They are way too self-involved to recognize what is going on with other people.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Lucinda, who wrote: “We just don’t know what that relationship is and unless you have experienced that kind of emotional abuse, it is hard to explain the incredible societal pressure to keep that person in your life because they somehow deserve it because of what?”

        I ‘did’ experience that kind of emotional abuse, and it’s hard on any child, but when you become an adult you are responsible for your ‘own’ well-being and emotional health. I chose to claim my own self-identity and discovered my own self-worth. Living in the emotional past with your abused inner-child gives your mother, father, uncle, aunt, whomever control and power over you … and that’s no way for anyone to live. My brother and sister waited until my mother became old, frail, sick and vulnerable before slamming her with claims of injustice when we were children. I’m the youngest, but I told them both that they should have handled that shite with her before she became vulnerable, when she was still able to stand face to face with them. It was cruel.

        Your mother, father, or both treated you like shite when you were a child? When you leave their house, work on yourself and realize how special you are and embrace your own self-worth and self-love. Then walk up to your mother or father or both–adult to adult, not child to parent–and tell them how their behavior toward you when you were a child made you feel. And then let that shite go, because life is too short and your mother/father may have been going through something you weren’t aware of when you were a child. Something your inner child wouldn’t have understood, but your adult self might. Your mother or father may even be unaware of how much what they said to you hurt or damaged you. Some wicked people who should have never become parents may have done it on purpose, but it’s just not in me to believe all parents who emotionally abuse their kids do so on purpose.

        I hope that didn’t come off as a lecture, it wasn’t meant as one. Just something from my own experience.

      • LAK says:

        Lucinda: OMG internet hugs. My mother was exactly as you describe your mother.

        People who never experience that sort of emotional abuse from a parent, especially when it comes from the mother, never, ever understand.

        It’s easier to cut off ties from an emotionally abusive father and not have people guilt you into reconciling because the narrative for fathers is that they are less attached/involved with their children and therefore more likely to abuse them.

        People can never get their heads around emotionally abusive mothers. The only accepted reason to remove them from your life is if they harm you physically. Whether they were abused themselves or simply mentally unwell or unwitting in their abuse, it’s rare that they stop when you are an adult.

        The day I removed my mother from my life was and remains the happiest day of my life. And it was the hardest thing I have ever done because I had to recognise that despite the biological imperative, my mother was really toxic and she would continue to be toxic as long as she lived. I’ve never looked back because I was and I am finally at peace. And that helps me stand my ground when people suggest we reconcile. It doesn’t make me immature or someone stuck in the past. It’s recognising that this person only adds negatives to me, and it’s never going to change. I don’t need to harangue my mother about events and emotions that I feel now or felt then.

        I hope you have peace in your life, and know that there are more of us out in the world who understand and know your experience.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      @Perplexed, who wrote: “Jon Voight didn’t get an invite to Angelina and Brad’s wedding. Didn’t he hear about it through the news? That didn’t bother me, so Aniston not inviting her mom to her wedding gets the same shrug reaction from .”

      It’s not the same thing at all. Angie didn’t invite Jon Voight to the wedding because they wanted to keep it a secret, not because Angie has her hate on for her father. You can Google ‘Jon Voight with his grandchildren’ or ‘Jon Voight with his daughter Angelina Jolie’ and you will get recent pictures. However, Angie knows that father can not keep secrets from the press (he just can’t seem to help himself), so no one told him about the wedding.

      • perplexed says:

        I don’t really care if it’s not the same reason. I just think everybody has their own reasons for how they handle these things with their parents, and neither situation really gets judgment from me. In the end, neither parent got to go to their kids’ weddings, so the reason might be different, but the result is the same. But I’m sure Angelina and Jennifer know their own situations better than you or I do. Not inviting your dad to your wedding because he has a big mouth actually sounds weirder as an excuse to me than not inviting your mother because you find her problematic as a human being, but in the end they both made a decision that has nothing to do with me and everything to do with their own personal existence, so I’m not going to get up in arms about how they handled their celebratory milestones. They have a right to enjoy their day they want to, and since I’m not getting an invite to either I feel no pressing need to have a strong opinion about how they should handle their weddings or their relationships with their parents.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        You don’t see the difference between not inviting a parent with a big mouth when you want a private wedding and know the parent would spill the beans at the airport before boarding his plane, and not inviting a parent out of spite and passive-aggressive anger?

      • cat1 says:

        well even if so (and I agree with perplexed about not inviting father reason vs. ja mother reason), why not call your dad up afterwards to say *hey we got married wanted you to hear it from me vs. the media?! * vs. letting him find out from the media? that is weird. I am sorry. I dont believe she is close to her dad.

      • perplexed says:

        I can see the difference, though none of this affects my life in anyway, so I don’t really care who chooses to invite or not invite what parent to their wedding. I just think that only they know the reasons for why they have the kind of relationships they do with their parents. We don’t know no matter how much or how little they tell us in a magazine. If she was angry at her mother, I’m sure she had a good reason that she knows about. People don’t randomly wind up angry at their parents — more often than not, the parent did something that ticked the child off considerably and probably deserves the freeze-out. I don’t feel obligated to judge her or anyone else for the reasons they have as to why they freeze out certain family members. They know their own story — I don’t.

  22. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    She looks pretty. Interview was sort of same old, same old. Comments on here are definitely same old, same old. No matter what she says, certain people just go back to their deeply entrenched opinions. I know, don’t click on it.

    • Jayna says:

      The photo shoot is fantastic of her.

    • Catk says:

      Agreed to all of the above. It’s like I can’t help but read all the comments, knowing how rabid and crazed people are about JA.

    • mia girl says:

      She looks great. The interview was fine for me, even if it does cover some of her usual topics. I understand the comments “it has been 10 years, let it go”, etc. and I suppose they are right.

      On the other hand, I know people who have gone through divorce, who yes, even after 10 years, what happened is still a “presence” in their life. Some things define you, even to yourself, and for many a divorce can do that.

      One of my close girlfriends continues to reflect on her divorce, the person she became during those times and since – even as the years have passed. She has gone through stages of a change in perspective. She doesn’t talk about it on a weekly basis or anything, but it’s still there, and even all these years later, many people still talk to her about her ex-husband (he and she still travel in the same social circles). We might be at a gathering and women will still bring it up and what an “*s*hole” he is (PS he really was for many reasons – not comparing to Pitt)

      So with this in mind, I’ll give Aniston the benefit of the doubt that after years of reflection she has a new perspective on the whole thing… And no doubt, her new PR person is telling her she should make her new perspective clear to change the narrative. Because overall, I think Aniston is playing the long game right now, this is not just about this award season but changing her perception and her tone. We will see if it pays off.

      • The Original G says:

        I get what you’re saying. But, when let’s say that your friend was going to a job interview or being written up in a trade journal; would you advise her to talk about her divorce?

        What might have paid off was to signal what her new professional passions were. That she’s open to producing and can be approached about indie projects or is looking to option some screen treatments.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Mia Girl, who wrote: “On the other hand, I know people who have gone through divorce, who yes, even after 10 years, what happened is still a “presence” in their life. Some things define you, even to yourself, and for many a divorce can do that.
        One of my close girlfriends continues to reflect on her divorce, the person she became during those times and since – even as the years have passed. She has gone through stages of a change in perspective.”

        I get what you’re saying too, but are these people you know still talking about their ex-es after three relationships, two of which lasted for over a year, and a current 2 1/2-year engagement? If so, how did their new significant others feel about that? How did/do their fiancees feel about that?

      • Annie says:

        why does she keep on answering questions about Brad and Angelina? Clearly she is using them, she knows people will be more interested if she mentions them. She is such a USER as always. she also seems getting cocky nowadays and so pretentious; she wants to direct, she is good in this or that and most of all she said she is up for something bigger, lol. Anyways, I always find her so dumb stuttering all the time in her live interviews. I don’t think she is capable to direct a full length movie and yet she keeps on talking about it.

        everything about Aniston is superficial, even the way she looks. She looks good only if she has her fake tan and if she is photoshopped. As we all know, the real her is really an unattractive potty mouth crass woman just like in her character in her movie Cake.

      • Esmom says:

        Of course most ordinary peasants aren’t going to talk about their divorces in job interviews. But JA is a celeb, who was married to an A-list celeb, who is now married to another A-list celeb…it’s going to come up, especially when her life story is the topic. And as evidenced by the number of comments here, people want to read about it.

        And when she doesn’t talk about it, she gets slammed for only talking about hair or makeup. She clearly will never, ever win with a certain segment who loves to hate her.

      • The Original G says:

        @Esmom. Acting. Films. The entertainment industry. Why doesn’t an award nominated actor talk about ANY of those?

        ~ Challenges of women in the film industry.
        ~ Exciting new projects that she’ looking for
        ~ What she learned by being involved in an indie project
        ~ The future of film project with multi-platform distribution
        ~Mentoring young people in the industry
        ~Performance or projects that she admires
        ~How she sharpens her acting skills
        ~Possible collaboration with other artists
        ~How does an award nomination assist her in developing new projects
        ~Support for her charities

        ……………….and so on.

    • I Choose Me says:

      Pretty much GNAT.

      These are some great pics of her though.

    • doofus says:

      “Comments on here are definitely same old, same old.”

      over 200 of the same old, same old.

      I avoided this thread and kept watching the number of comments go up and up and up…for a boring woman, people have an awful lot to say about her.

  23. Beth says:

    She doesn’t sound like she’s holding a grudge to me.

  24. Katie says:

    Sigh. Snooze. I liked her better when she was shallow and fancy free. Victim du jour doesn’t play well on her.

  25. Cecada says:

    “We are not in daily communication…”

    Why the hell would you be in daily communication with Brad, honey? Wow she really can’t move on can she?

    • k says:

      my interpretation of that line was, though poorly phrased, that she meant that there are no hard feelings or ill will, they still like each other well enough but aren’t besties or anything…it kind of reminded me of the jada smith thing where she said angelina was helpful and it was rad but they weren’t hanging out or anything.

    • someone says:

      I think that comment from her was a follow up to a question she was asked by an interviewer from CBS Sunday morning. Here was the interview:

      “You guys still talk?” he asked the 45-year-old star in regards to her relationship with Pitt today. “You friends?”

      “We’ve exchanged good wishes and all that sort of stuff to each other, but not a constant thing,” Aniston replied with honesty. “I mean, do you talk to your ex-wife?”

      “No,” Cowan replied. “When I have to, I do.”

      • Amanda says:

        @Someone her publicist vets questions. She actively encourages these questions. Because Brad and Angelina keep her relevant.

  26. lisa2 says:

    So let’s run this down

    Jennifer did her I’m and Oscar nominee interview with THR. She opened up. spilled the beans. She talked YET again about a marriage that ended 10 years ago. A subject she says she is tired of. Now everyone should understand the timeline of this. She obviously did this interview before the nominations came out. THR added the additional commentary after. So before the nominations she started flapping her lips about Brad Pitt and their divorce.. It kills me how she uses “WE” and “OUR”. Now we fast forward the REAL and she didn’t get the anticipated nomination.. she knew this interview was coming out. And to mask the SHOCK of her yet again talking about her broken marriage she goes on a clean up tour and talks about how everyone should move on.. she loved Angie’s movie.. there is no feud.

    She said one thing I have always knows. She is passive aggressive. And has anger issues. So I’m going to enjoy her fans spinning it to blame the other two and say how she is asked about her past.. PISS on that. She needs to remind them that she is here to stay.

  27. Tarsha says:

    Good. So for the third or 4th time, she has admitted no affair happened. Think commenters will accept it, once and for all? Hell no! They will NEVER accept it!
    “And I was like, ‘Oh, guys! Seriously? The Bachelor? That’s been on for 15 years or something.’ ”
    Is this woman really 46 years of age? She talks like a socially inept teenager.

    • perplexed says:

      I don’t think her comment about The Bachelor was weird. That’s how people DO talk about The Bachelor.

      • Tarsha says:

        Really? 46 year old women talk like Valley girls?

      • perplexed says:

        Were you expecting an intellectual comment about The Bachelor? She sounds no different from any other adult I’ve heard talk about reality tv, including those upper crust British types who went to Oxford (or wherever) like Eddie Redmayne. It’s hard to talk about The Bachelor as if it’s the State of the Union.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      Yep, like a ‘Surfer Dude-dette’ 18-year-old Valley Girl.

  28. Gracie says:

    Oh god, Jennifer, maybe it’s time NOT to be a broken record on repeat?

  29. Tarsha says:

    I don’t understand why she can’t just leave Brad and Angelina alone, once and for all. Why is she SO *OBSESSED* with them? Why can’t she just get on with her life and leave them alone? If Justin was her real boyfriend (which I doubt) how would he feel, reading that his girlfriend/fiancé kept on talking about her ex husband? As a woman, I don’t mind saying if it were me and my boyfriend/fiancé kept on talking about his ex girlfriend/wife/fiancé, I’d be ropable!

    • Camille (The Original) says:

      I don’t get it either. They have nothing tying them together (no children or businesses etc), and he is long ago in her past. If she *must* talk about an old relationship, I’d rather hear about Vince Vaughn or John Mayer etc.

  30. scout says:

    Man! She is talking too much these days but glad she is clearing up all the rumors about her and Brad’s divorce. I think she is happy and at peace now with her personal life, got over the resentment. That’s why the Love for Angie and Brad. Great, I like it when women respect each other, not bickering and hating!
    She looks good there but when on live interviews,she looks puffy in the face. She does have great legs.

  31. Charlie says:

    Unpopular opinion, but I think she came across really good in thins interview. I do think she’s trying to give closure to the whole story – I mean, people made such huge fuss over the fact that she and Angelina went to the same event.

    Also, her mother sound horrible. That kinf of thing can leave lifelong scars. And I don’t think she’s like her mother at all.

    • Except the biggest issue is that she said she wanted to lay all of it to rest, and for the media to move on from the story about a feud between her and Angelina. And that she’s tired of talking about it. So unless she, Brad, and Angelina magically became besties between now and then, I don’t see why she should keep talking about them. She’s repeating the same old stuff….furthering the ‘feud’. I can see how it would get annoying, but she doesn’t have to pay attention to anything that is written about her. Or Angelina. There are a lot of ways that she can ignore it.

      I don’t see how she needs to give closure to it–closure to what? She was separated 10 years ago from Brad. Divorced later that year. No kids. She’s saying the same things in 2008 i.e. no affair, Brad’s great, that she’s saying now. You’d think that she’s want to talk about her career, NOT her ex.

      And I agree that her mother sounds horrible–but she’s said in the past that they had made up/decided to leave the past in the past and become friends again. I just find it weird that every time she talks about her mother, she talks about how horrible she was. She doesn’t seem like she’s moved past it–that’s not a criticism. But she seems to hold onto things–contrary to what she said in this interview.

    • perplexed says:

      I thought she sounded fine too, or at the very least no different from any other celebrity who talks about themselves without going extreme like Megan Fox during her “farts smell like the food you ate” phase.

  32. Frosty says:

    As someone with issues similar to hers, I find Jennifer relatable, likeable. AND I like AJ. I’m into all of them. So there!

    • Ally.J says:

      Me too Frosty, especially about not speaking out and holding the anger in, it’s something I’m trying to work through at the moment. I like both her and Angelina too, I don’t feel the same way about Brad to be honest.

    • k says:

      this.
      🙂

    • Camille (The Original) says:

      Good for you! 🙂

      Although you do realize that some people just dislike certain celebs for whatever reason (and it doesn’t have to have anything to do with a stupid media made up feud either!). Just like some people don’t like Gwyneth Paltrow or Kim Kardashian etc. No one has to like everyone. Everyone is allowed an opinion.

      Jmtc

  33. Ginger says:

    Let’s not inflict this woman upon the poor Dalai Lama please.

  34. msw says:

    I can’t believe headlines like “Jennifer is just fine” are still getting read. Its been ten years! They have been separated twice as long as they were married! Insanity.

    • Janet says:

      Well, why wouldn’t she be just fine? She’s engaged to be married (to a guy who plays third fiddle after her ex-husband and her deceased boyfriend); she won recognition for Cake (even though she not only got snubbed, she’s the Number One Snub); she’s a very pretty woman (although spiteful Mommy criticized her hairstyle) and she’s a serious actress posing for a serious magazine cover in her underwear. Every day in every way her life gets better and better.

  35. Tippy says:

    Sounds like Jenn has overcome some substantial obstacles in her life.

    It’s always easier to forgive than forget and grudges are not necessarily bad if a person can harness that emotion in a way which works to their advantage.

  36. Anon says:

    Jennifer cannot keep track of her lies at this point. Even who does the “amazing Carbonara dishes” have reversed chefs. Either Justin told her to stop talking about his eyeballs or he’s half out the door. (who wouldn’t be the way she throws people under the bus or throws people in others’ faces?) JA has some rage issues, too.

  37. The Original G says:

    I am flabbergasted that she has selected the moment that she has been working so hard to change her career trajectory to re-litigate her disputes with her mother, her marriage and grief for her therapist. In a trade mag?

    Also, in spite of all her advantages, she sounds quite depressed.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      She sound like someone who does not, and has never, liked themselves much.

    • Josephina says:

      Ha! That’s what I thought as well.

      The rants about her mother to THR are out of place and UNNECESSARY. i do see why she still needs a therapist. Emotionally, she needs a lot of work. And that is exactly what Justin will be marrying. This woman virtually has no stress in her life yet she can create a mountain out of a molehill.

      Oscar snub? Mean Mommy issues? Dead ex boyfriend from the past? Still ex-husband stalking?

      My take is that her Mommy issues are the REAL reason why she has not pro-created. With all of the fame, resources and money she has, she is still looking for a purpose and still wants a baby.

      I do see her as a damaged woman, but not necessarily all at the hands of her mother. Her value system and sense of self are the cornerstones of her dilemma. She still seems sad. And no, no man nor BABY can fix it.

  38. GoOnGirl! says:

    It happened. Finally, her 10-year after divorce from Brad special. Only I thought People would have carried it. WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE SOMEWHERE, SOMEHOW GIVE THIS WOMAN AN AWARD, SO SHE CAN STFD AND STFU AND DISAPPEAR? She makes Justin look like a fool. The Brad and Angie fans had been saying since day 1, including this twit herself, no one cheated. NOW WILL EVERYONE BELIEVE IT?

    • Toot says:

      As to your question, Nope! Her fans love blaming Angelina and calling B&A fans crazy for saying there was no cheating.

  39. lisa2 says:

    Not to fear.. her fans can praise how great she looks in the spread while overlooking all that crap she is spouting off.. Not surprising. That is all she talks about and all they notice. I guess a win win all around.

  40. Esmerelda says:

    “It was the first time I remember being so comfortable [with a romantic interest], like with all my gay friends”

    uhm, the reason why I’m ‘so comfortable’ with my gay friends is the fact that sex is out of the equation… to have that with my boyfriend would be impractical, to say the least… but if that’s how she rolls… (this sheds some light on the wedding business, no?)

  41. Irene says:

    Ugh, what a b*tch. The fact that she waited 10 years to admit that no one cheated, letting the press rake Angelina over the coals for years and years, playing the victim. UGH. What an awful, shallow, fame wh*re of a woman.

  42. Triple Cardinal says:

    While Aniston’s PR team can control which subjects are broached, there is no way THR would give her copy approval. If THR wants to retain any credibility, approval stays with the editors and publisher. This story–any story–gets perused by several pairs of eyes.

    Aniston went into this interview expecting a sympathetic writeup–and there’s no reason for her not to get one–but in no way would THR print only what’s been pre-approved. That would make them no better than Kneepads.

    • cat1 says:

      i agree. the people who keep stating that heard it on some gossip page about some other mag that potentially does that. does not mean they *all* do but people become convinced they are experts on this! 🙂

      • LAK says:

        Umm, I work in media, started my career in Celeb PR. Jen has copy and photo approval. You might not like it, but it’s the truth.

      • And even if we didn’t hear it from LAK–it was outright said by the Vogue UK Editor. Jennifer won’t ever appear on the cover of her magazine, because she demands copy approval. That doesn’t magically change–especially with a 45 year old woman who is set in her ways.

  43. HoustonGrl says:

    Not to empathize with this overly self-involved woman, but at the same time, divorce is a major life event. It probably stays with you in a big way and becomes a large part of your identity. I don’t think there should be shame bringing it up when answering questions about your personal life. Then again, not sure why she wants to answer those questions. I’d be too scared to have that stuff splashed all over the place.

    • cat1 says:

      also it was done so publicly. like four months after the separation and right after the divorce, he was out there with angelina and maddox. that hurt. she could not even go through it all in private – it was all quite public. the w cover, etc. so i am sure the pain, embarrassment – and then years of * jen alone * type magazine covers – still lingers in some way.

      • Well it clearly didn’t bother her as much you think it did, because she did the exact thing to Heidi. She and Justin took those lovey dovey couple pictures a week after Heidi moved out of her shared apartment with Justin……Uncle Terry took them. And they took them just because–not in promotion of a film, but of their new relationship.

        I agree that the “W” pictures were not the most sensitive, but let’s be real. The pictures were the July 2005 cover of W Magazine……that’s a whole seven months to steel herself, and three months after it was revealed Brad and Angelina had a thing (the Africa photos). The pictures were in promotion of Mr. and Mrs. Smith–I actually thought it was very interesting and creative way to promote the films. Both deal with marriages that look perfect on the outside.

        The W pictures take place in the sixties, with the perfect, thin, God fearing wife who popped out five kids while retaining her figure, and a God fearing handsome husband who leads his house, and makes lots of money. On the outside. On the inside she’s below him (particularly that picture of Angelina under the table, while everyone else is eating, trying to get food off the floor, when the food is actually closes to Brad), she’s always drunk/high, and he’s abusive and crazy.

        Again–a few of the pictures (maybe like 5/25) had pictures of them with a bunch of kids. Not the most sensitive when you’re going through a divorce when your ex is being talked about as a work crazy woman who won’t have a baby.

        But beyond those initial pics (and I think a cover on PEOPLE in the summer), Brad and Angelina were quiet about their relationship until they announced that they were pregnant. And please–Jennifer started dating Vince Vaughn by that summer. She wasn’t so torn up about Brad that she couldn’t let anyone in for years after….

  44. idsmith says:

    Ava Duvernay was snubbed, Jen just wasn’t nominated. That’s all.

  45. anne_000 says:

    – “Nobody did anything wrong.”
    – “She was also very unforgiving. She would hold grudges that I just found so petty.” Aniston herself claims to hold no grudges and is forgiving “probably to a fault.”

    …says the grown woman who’s been milking an imaginary love triangle for a decade….

  46. Janet says:

    Oh dear God, cue the violins: “I’m dyslexic! My mommy is mean! My husband left me for Angelina! I’m the Number One Snub! My first love up and died on me! Lookit my legs! Somebody pay attention to meeee!!”

    Another day, another whine. What’s next? She got a hangnail? She suffers from chronic flatulence? I can hardly wait.

  47. someone says:

    I think people are taking the “nobody did anything wrong” too literal. I doubt she’s saying Brad didn’t have something going with Angelina. I think she’s more saying things happen when you are married and that it isn’t “wrong” to do what you feel you need to do. To me it reads more like a “taking the high road” comment than an admission that Brad didn’t on some level leave their marriage for Angelina.

    • Amanda says:

      She has said that comment a few times. She herself admitted twice before that Brad did not cheat. She herself said she told him to sleep with Ang and “get her out of his system” but he couldn’t do that. Even Courtney said the same thing, that there was no affair, and Jennfier was fully aware at all times of his attraction to Angelina. Jennifer has never taken the high road before, so why start now? If she was genuine about taking the high road, she would reiterate what she said in her first ever interview, that she personally told Brad to have an affair with Angelina and come back to her, but he refused to cheat. Its much too late for her to take the high road now, when she banked her career on taking the low road.

      • Jayna says:

        You are totally changing the context of what she said. She never told him to cheat with Angie and get it out of his system.

        And she said she chose to believe her husband when he said he didn’t cheat but it clearly showed her struggle with trying to keep believing that in the face of what was unfolding.

      • Josephina says:

        Jayna-

        She DID say for him to get it out his system (i.e. find himself) and return to her- which he flatly refused to do and said so to her face.

        Hoe found a better, more fulfilling life with Angie– and that has been the source of her anger and snarky comments documented over the last decade throught live and print interviews.

        Now that she has been in her FIRST relationship that has lasted longer than two year- she feels secure enough to say “nobody did anything wrong.” That was always the truth- JP fans knew it all long because she said so in 2005. Jenhens never had a foundation for their platform other than projecting personal stories of love rejection and ill-advised revenge.

      • Janie says:

        Jayna, read Vanity Fair. Starting from the announcement of their split, that their split had nothing to do with the press speculation, to the Vanity Fair article to the frequent comments such as there are no bad guys, I’m not a victim, Brad is a great guy, right up til now where she says Brad didn’t do anything wrong. So she clearly was not struggling at all since she hasn’t changed the narrative for 10 years and this interview proves it.

    • Ennie says:

      …taking into account how she got with JT.

  48. perplexed says:

    I can understand people sympathizing with Brad and Angelina if you’re a fan of their charisma and movies, but her mom sounds weird. It’s hard for me to get worked up if Aniston chooses to discuss her. I think the mom may have unwittingly opened herself up for discussion though by talking to Hard Copy and then writing the book where she talks about Jennifer. After that, I think the kid has a right to a rebuttal in a magazine…

    Coincidentally, I think Aniston and Jolie might have similar relationships with their parents (Aniston with her mom, and Jolie with her dad, where he seems to also run to the tabloids when he has to talk about her).

    • Jayna says:

      Jen has talked about her before many years ago. They were estranged for years. Not too many years ago they reconciled. Her mother is 78 and had a stroke several years back. What was the point to make so many critical remarks about her mother again while she is alive and embarrass and hurt her? I’m not doubting there was good reason for the estrangement back when, but this is old stuff and was so hurtful considering they are back on decent terms. She didn’t even balance it or temper it. I found it harsh to say about her elderly mother.

      I am on no team. I like Jen and Angie. I have seen most of Jen’s movies even. Angie doesn’t go around discussing her father. She got her say out years ago, and I haven’t seen her go to extremes again in describing all of his character flaws like Jen did in this interview. I just didn’t get it. There was no reason for her to do it at this stage of the game.

      “She was also very unforgiving. She would hold grudges that I just found so petty.”

      Talk about petty, Jen. LOL

      I had a great mother I loved with all my heart, but she was far from perfect if I wanted to dissect her and bring up some stuff she once said to me or did that was hurtful or that was part of her personality because of her own upbringing. But I knew if I had a cold and called, she and dad would drive to another state for me. I was loved. I wasn’t a perfect daughter. I have an older brother who this day is so critical of my parents, picking out all of their flaws or perceived flaws. I just remember the unconditional love. I have two friends with critical mothers like Jen has with problematic relationships with them to this day also. I get it, that there’s long-term issues, but why do this again publicly?

      Jen’s mother will be dead one day. She’s closing in on 80. And this is just something hurtful in print she can’t take back, saying those things again, with no balance of all the great things her mother did. That was saved for her grandmother in the article.

      • perplexed says:

        I don’t really have any judgment on celebrities who have complicated relationships with their parents or for why they talk about them since only they know what’s going on. Brooke Shields wrote a book about her mom recently and some of it seemed critical to me, but considering her mom seemed like a bit of a nut job to me, I figured it was within Shields’ right to write about it. If you don’t want your kids saying critical things about you, don’t be a jerk (which some of the parents of these celebrity figures appear to be ).

    • Guesto says:

      She seems so empty and passionless. Oh for sure she tries to comes across as if she has an enormous lust for life but the reality of the safe life she lives tells the true story. I remember her talking about her passion for travel! If anyone was in a position to fulfill that passion, then it’s Jennifer Aniston, but yet, there she is, year in, year out, in dullsville Cabo.

      She really is a borefest.

      • perplexed says:

        She does sound like she’s searching for something (which kind of surprised me because she was effective at playing Rachel Green), but I can relate to that search. In that sense I think I could understand her answers (the ones not related to the triangle, I mean, although those didn’t offend me or anything.)

  49. Kim1 says:

    What I got from the interview is she wants a baby and she is trying to make it happen.So Baby Bump Watch resumes

  50. Penelope says:

    God this marginally talented woman is tedious.

    • Guesto says:

      She really is Tedium personified. She tries so hard to be ‘up’ and above it all benevolent but the real, self-involved, petty, dreary, grudge-holding Jennifer always shines through.

  51. daughterofjean says:

    Love the photos! She looks beautiful.

  52. J says:

    Jen’s mom holding a grudge against her when she was a child is a rather different beast than holding a grudge against a dude who dumped you (and/or “emotionally cheated” on you). Seriously, there’s a different power dynamic which can’t and shouldn’t be overlooked.

    • Josephina says:

      Stop giving power to other people. Stop letting sad and hurtful events in your life define you.

      Signed,

      A mature adult

  53. DiamondGirl says:

    Interviewers still ask Nicole Kidman about Tom Cruise and that’s been longer than ten years and she’s married with two more kids.

    They ask Billy Bob about Angie.

    They still bring up Pitt and Affleck to Gwyneth and she wasn’t married to either of them.

    Same with JLo and Affleck.

    That’s what interviewers do when two famous people were EVER together. Those people all answer the questions – they don’t run screaming from the room. So this is no different except that some people harbor such fanatical hatred for this women. It’s very odd.

    • someone says:

      I just saw a Jennifer Garner story on the Daily Mail and the top comments were all along the lines of “Ben picked the right Jennifer when he married her and not JLo”. Really – that’s all people want to comment on about Jennifer Garner is that Ben was right to marry her and not JLo?

      • Jayna says:

        I think that’s because J-Lo has been out so much recently promoting her movie and talking about failed love, etc, in promoting her book and had mentioned Ben in it and in interviews. In fact, she is on the DailyMail also with a story. It does seem like it is worse than it usually is referring to how lucky Ben is. LOL

    • jwoolman says:

      Exactly. They just answer the questions. It’s rare to flat out refuse to answer questions, and if she did – folks here would still be dissecting every word she didn’t speak. It’s a no win situation for Aniston, really. Interviewers keep bringing up the same stuff over and over again – she’s not writing op-eds about it. She and Pitt were married. It didn’t work out, and not because either one of them was an awful person. They both had weaknesses that made it hard for them to fix what was broken. They are just better off not married to each other. Stuff happens. Both of them have changed over the years and so their perspectives on what happened and how to deal with each other when in casual contact (they’re in the same profession) have evolved. The interviewers are the ones stuck in a time warp.

      Her comments about her mom were not vicious but seemed quite restrained to me. She was talking about things that formed her, things that she had trouble dealing with. And mom was one of those things. Just because mom wasn’t beating her with a stick or starving her in a closet doesn’t mean mom is a kindly person with her daughter’s best interest at heart. She really sounds like someone Aniston needs to distance herself from. My mom was indeed a nice person although she was hard for me to be around because of her broadcasting anxiety. But she was never abusive and never made me feel bad about myself. She deserved loyalty. Moms don’t have to be perfect, they’re allowed to make honest mistakes and have weaknesses. Aniston’s mom was in quite another category. Not all mothers are nice people. Not mentioning some of the reasons her mother badly affected her would be like not mentioning her dyslexia. The trauma is real and you don’t just shake it off, the buttons continue to be pushed even as the source of the trauma becomes old and physically frail. As my aunt always said, you don’t change as you get older but just get more like yourself. A toxic parent doesn’t get better with age. And toxic parents don’t earn loyalty. They will come in for the kill when the opportunity arises. Who knows what tricks mom started pulling again behind closed doors. And yes, that can badly affect you even as an aging grownup yourself. Yet another no win situation for Aniston – if she distances herself from toxic mom with no explanation, folks here rant on about how uncaring and selfish she is. If she gives any hints about her need to stay away from this toxic person, she’s just a horrible daughter saying awful things about mom.

      • perplexed says:

        I remember reading an interview where she said her dad told her to go to her room unless she could find something interesting to say since she was kind of dull. I like Victor Kiriakis, but neither of her parents sound interesting themselves so I thought it was weird they were putting the onus on the kid to try and be interesting rather than trying to find a way to engage the kid (maybe in some kind of activity) to bring out her strengths conversation-wise.

        Anyway, she wound up saving her dad’s job at Days of Our Lives when she became successful so it’s kind of funny to me that despite however dull her father might have found her to be as a child we wouldn’t continue to be seeing Victor Kiriakis on Days of Our Lives without her dullness as an adult.

      • perplexed says:

        I think I put this post in the wrong place. My comment is related to Jennifer’s level of articulateness.

    • But it’s the same with the people you listed–clearly they’ve not put that on their “no-go” list. I don’t know why, unless they were friends, a person would want to talk about their exes at all.

      • DiamondGirl says:

        Because making a point of saying “oh no, don’t ever mention this!” makes it into a bigger deal than it is.

        They have famous exes; people ask; they answer. When they’re over it, and it’s just part of their past, why not answer?

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @DiamondGirl …

        Then for this particular pair of ex-ex, why is this excuse of “simply answering questions asked, thats all” acceptable for Jennifer Aniston, but not for Brad Pitt? That’s always the standard response for her, but it’s “He’d better shut his mouth about Jen!” with Brad Pitt … and Angie, too.

  54. hilda says:

    she’s just being nice , everyone knows they cheated

    • someone says:

      +1 (and I’m a Jolie/Pitt fan)

    • Kim1 says:

      ITA everyone knows Justin cheated on Heidi with Jennifer
      BTW I can’t wait to see Justin and Jennifer’s baby since she has confirmed she wants to be a mother.There are so many options for a woman with her resources to have a baby.

      • hilda says:

        ok justin cheated with jen on heidi , does this make what brangelina did right ? if you can’t wait to see somebody else having a baby that obviously means you have nothing going on in your own life!

    • Jayna says:

      What’s interesting is Jen has never been that articulate of a person. In TV interviews, she has a small vocabulary and never comes across deep or interesting. Not that I mean she is shallow. I don’t think Jen is shallow at all and I think she is a nice person and is alway self-deprecating in interviews, very likable and cute, but I don’t think she is a scintillating conversationalist with a lot to say. When I read some of these interviews for the Oscar campaign it does sound like she is trying to hard to throw a new narrative or rehashed dialogue into the interviews to make her more interesting and show different sides to herself, but some of it comes off forced or rehashed and that oddly enough she hasn’t evolved all that much since her split from Brad. She is still the same Jen, not terribly evolved in ten years. The difference is back after the split, the girl was in a world of pain, as anyone would be, and when I read the link to the Vanity Fair article, it’s the most open and articulate she’s ever been on expressing all of her feelings and it was from an honest place. She was in the trenches of a very public split with her soon-to-be ex (divorce not final) having just released the staged photo of him and Jolie and her child on the beach to introduce slowly to the world the fact that, yes, we are together. Jen was enduring all of this in the eye of the storm, but I found her interview very thoughtful and fair and intriguing because it was fresh and the first time anyone had heard from her on the subject as it had been going on. I think it is one of the most moving interviews I have read of a celebrity going through a painful split so publicly who fell in love with his famous co-star. She exhibited real grace in the interview when discussing her feelings about Brad and the ending of their marriage.

      The problem since then nothing has changed for Jen. She is settled down with someone she loves very much, but the dynamics of her life are still as-is, so there’s nothing really fascinating or new coming from her because she isn’t articulate in live interviews and in print is relying on discussing many of the same things about her complicated side to show she has more depth because of her Oscar campaign. But this time they aren’t fresh comments. They are the same things (especially when you go back and read the Vanity Fair article linked on CB) except her long-lost love dying of brain cancer was new.

      I do hope Jen and Justin work out, though. I really do. I do believe she really loves him.

      • That’s why I never really like her comments about her divorce, her mother ,etc…..it’s not that I don’t think she has the right to talk about them….it’s her life, her image, she can talk about whatever she wants. But she always talks about stuff like it’s in the present–she doesn’t really evolve.

        She basically just repeated the same things (as you said) from ten years ago. And this is AFTER she recently stated that she wanted the feud to be over and gone. So why is she still talking about it? I could see her talking about Brad and Angelina, if she revealed that they’d become friends, but they clearly have nothing to do with each other. So what’s the purpose in saying it again? Why would Jennifer want to be “nice” in saying that Brad and Angelina didn’t cheat (as a poster stated on the upthread somewhere)? She has nothing to do with them, they have nothing to do with her. If she’s SO over it, why does she need to tell the world about it. Bitch about it to your friends.

        And I guess I disagree with her and Justin–I honestly don’t think that they deeply love each other. They always seem like they’re having a good time together, when they’re together, but Jennifer doesn’t seem like she’s with her soulmate. They don’t really seem like a pair. To me, Jennifer seems like someone who is fine with having a “special friend” (or two or three, get it!) who she’ll meet up once or twice a month, and then she gets on with her life and her friends.

    • Why would she need to be nice? Especially since she has no need to talk about her divorce or about Brad. And if she did talk about it, she could go with something generic, as “I hope he’s happy, I’m happy”. They don’t have any sort of a relationship. There’s no need to protect him, ESPECIALLY since it’s been ten years AND she’s in a supposedly happy relationship that’s (allegedly) going to end in marriage. Why even bring him up or answer questions about him? She’s flipping ENGAGED! To date, she’s said more about her ex and his wife, than she has about her fiance.

      And if, as you say, “everyone” knows that you cheated, then why would it be a shock for her to say it? And if she didn’t want to say it, then why even refer to it? She’s not dumb enough NOT to know what people would think when she said, in reference to her divorce, “that nobody did anything wrong”…..when the tabloids have made a mint off of Brad and Angelina “doing something wrong”…..

      • maggie says:

        Like you said it’s her life. Brad was a part of her life at one time. I don’t see what’s wrong with talking about it. Plus she’s always asked. Angelina would never talk about it or be asked because she was the “other” woman. As far as Justin and Jennifer goes, I think they come off as a really cool couple and seem very much into one another. She always speaks highly of him. Always!

      • Maya says:

        @Maggie: well then Jennifer has no rights to talk about how she met and got with Justin because she was the “other” woman in that.

        You can attack Angelina for one thing and then give a pass for Jennifer for the same thing.

      • Maya says:

        @Maggie: well then Jennifer has no rights to talk about how she met and got with Justin because she was the “other” woman in that.

        You cannot attack Angelina for one thing and then give a pass for Jennifer for the same thing.

      • hilda says:

        virgilia sweetie get a life you always write long ass boring comments that i never finish

      • Ennie says:

        OMG hilda, you are not the only one reader in the net.

  55. perplexed says:

    I thought the interview sounded fine. I think the only criticism I have (or what I would change if I was her publicist) is to start doing more pictorials with pants on. I’m not offended by her pantsless look, but if she wants to be taken more seriously I think she could stand to do a few more ballgown pictorials or something. Nonetheless, her legs do look very toned.

  56. Crinkle says:

    It was a good interview IMO. The description of her narcissistic toxic mother sounds eerily familiar – my own mother was exactly the same. Adults who as children who were the focus of narcissistic fixation, struggle with the behavior patterns that we learned. We watched how our parents interacted, and it’s all we knew. Breaking out of any learned behaviors are difficult but it certainly can be done. It sounds to me like she has done a lot of work to do just that (learning how to express anger, etc.). I am 50 and I still constantly question my attitudes and behaviors. I know for a fact that some of my mom rubbed off on me (or I inherited it genetically or something) and it makes me ill when I hear it coming out in my own voice. Especially when it is focused at my own daughter. Ugh.

  57. Iheartgossip says:

    Ugh. She needs to put a sock in it

  58. Cindy says:

    I am torn about jennifer. I have always been fond of her and thought she handled her divorce well. I never felt she was playing the victim. I do, however, think she knowingly used the attention from her divorce to create a career beyond Friends. But, is that wrong? At worst it makes her an opportunist. BUT…the chelsea handler stuff made me question jennifer’s integrity. The insults were so vicious, so uncalled for, and took place years after the divorce. From that point forward I have wondered about her. I can’t figure out if she really is this lovable persona,or if she just plays this part so well.

    • Guest says:

      she was making movies during the taping of Friends and did nothing but continue to make movies. B&A&J all got far more attention for this tryst than should have. Hundreds of movie stars including Tom Hanks started on tv series. Chelsea talks crap about everybody. Why should Angelina be any different? AJ doesnt deserve special treatment.

      • annie says:

        Chandler’s insults to Angelina became worst when Aniston befriended her. Mind you, she used to insult Aniston also before, until she got invite to her house and spend vacay with her in Cabo. Aniston has no pride when in comes to her career, she kisses ass with everyone including people who have insulted her because what is important to her is her public image. She even befriended Perez Hilton so he would stop insulting her. She is that insecure or maybe because there are some truths to her portrayal of her. She is an opportunist and a user. Meanwhile, Angie couldn’t careless, she ignores them and totally comes out as a winner, because no matter how much negative publicity she has and with no publicist, Angie’s star power continues to shine.

        Anyways, Aniston probably thinks she has no use of perpetrating the “triangle” anymore to keep her in the limelight, hence, her recent pronouncements, because you know she got all these nominations, and movie offers will come her way. Haha, let’s see.

  59. Angie says:

    I went and read the whole interview and actually quite liked it. I didn’t know about her dyslexia. And I actually related to her issues dealing with anger. Both her fears in confronting it in others and expressing it herself. It can definitely come out later in very passive aggressive ways. She’s not this brilliant, deep person but she’s quite relatable and likable to me. At no point did she come across as self-pitying or whiney – even when discussing her toxic mother. But I do wonder if she has depressive tendencies. She seems a bit melancholy. A very wealthy woman that is not totally fulfilled. Her life seems a little empty.

    • Guest says:

      she seems pretty happy to me. Babies and a husband are not the end all beat all…..not even close.

      • lisa2 says:

        The she needs to stop making it an issue. She continues to hint at babies and marriage. But never closes the deal. If marriage is not the be all which is fine; then don’t get engaged to be married.. If babies are not the “be all” then why hint in an interview that the change in your life could “look like a baby” which is such a silly phrase. How does something “look like a baby’.. is she getting a doll to play with.

        she wrote this narrative and she keeps adding to it. Don’t blame the outside world for commenting on it when you yourself can’t shut up about it.

      • Crumpet says:

        Lisa2 – why do you think talking about babies is an ‘issue’? I think she is handling the inane baby questions that every WOMAN celebrity gets asked, the best way she can. AJ shut everyone up by having them – not every woman is able, nor in the position to do so. I actually admire women who refrain when unmarried, to bring children into the world who may or may not even know who their father is.

  60. TC says:

    It just feels like a PR maneuver anytime Aniston talks about her long dead marriage at this point. She’s used the last decade to throw out snarky little comments about Angie in her interviews (VF, Vogue, Elle, GQ), but now she’s making an attempt at graciousness and it just feels false to me. Like it’s a manipulation. Just feels like a PR move right from Huvane’s playbook. Also, how must Theroux feel with his fiancee still talking about an ex from a decade ago?! Theroux must feel like the 3rd wheel in that relationship. No wonder he spends so much time in NYC.

  61. TeresaMaria says:

    My humble observations over the years
    1. Jennifer does not seem happy and content in her life (whereas Reece and Sandra do)
    2. She still misses Brad. She has not closed that book (for reasons known only to her)

  62. Pumpkin Pie says:

    She’s got great legs, I give her that. Great legs.

  63. DottieDot says:

    Sure someone did. Brad did. Stupid comment.