Khloe Kardashian’s Pinocchio Butt will do E! red carpet coverage for 4 years


I cannot get enough of The Pinocchio Butt. Whenever we have a sighting – and whenever some brave paparazzo manages to get a side or back view – I always post the photos. Khloe Kardashian was spotted out and about in LA yesterday, I guess going to her gym. This is what confuses me about Khloe – she’s very committed to her workout and she does that stupid “waist training” stuff to look smaller (I’m including a new photo below), but then she gets those MASSIVE ass implants. I know the Kardashian Klan isn’t afraid of some augmentation, but it just seems like Khloe should make up her mind: does she want to look smaller or curvier? Which is it?

Meanwhile, Page Six reports today that the Kardashians have inked a massive $100 million, four-year deal with E!.

The Kardashians have signed a record-breaking, $100 million-plus deal to remain with E! for another four years, sources have exclusively confirmed to Page Six. Momager Kris Jenner recently secured the astonishing deal for herself and daughters Kim, Khloé, Kourtney, Kendall and Kylie Jenner. Bruce Jenner is not part of the deal, having previously agreed that he will be leaving after the upcoming 10th season of “Keeping Up With the Kardashians.” Bruce has his own show at E! based on his sex transition.

The Kardashian deal, the highest in TV history for a reality brand, is being kept strictly under wraps. E!’s parent company Comcast says it plans to save by spending less on content if its proposed merger with Time Warner Cable goes ahead. The deal covers at least four more seasons of “Keeping Up With the Kardashians” as well as spinoffs, which have included “Kourtney and Khloé Take the Hamptons.” E! executives also believe the family’s huge social media following will fuel future digital projects. Jenner had previously been rumored to be in talks about a Kardashian YouTube channel.

There will be further opportunities for the sisters under the new package. Khloé has been hosting red carpet coverage as well as post-Oscar and Grammy specials for E! Kim is also expected to produce her own future shows. Kanye West is not part of the deal, we’re told, but he will continue to appear on “Keeping Up.” Show creator Ryan Seacrest is also believed to be getting a sizeable fee.

[From Page Six]

Page Six also says that they’re looking to do something specifically with the Jenner sisters too, especially now that Kendall’s modeling career is taking off. Although Kylie and Kendall really seem to want to forge their own (non-reality show) path, so I wonder how that will work out. As for Khloe getting to do E! red carpet coverage… NO. Ugh. Khloe appeared on E!’s Oscar red carpet show too and she barely had anything to add. The Pinocchio Butt was a mess on that show too.

Here’s Khloe’s waist-training selfie from a few days ago. How is she not damaging her internal organs?!


Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

112 Responses to “Khloe Kardashian’s Pinocchio Butt will do E! red carpet coverage for 4 years”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. aims says:

    That ass is absurd!

  2. Talie says:

    When you get butt injections, do you have to keep up with them or do they last permanently?

    • MCraw says:

      I could be wrong, but I think u have to keep it up. It’s basically fat added on top of fat, but it’s not attached to anything. After a few years, that free floating fat starts to sag, which is why Kim’s butt looks like a diaper, Blacc Chyna was caught seeing a doc to correct her saggy butt, and Iggy Azalea suddenly had lots of cellulite and the shape of her butt looked off. This procedure, like all plastic surgery procedures, needs upkeep.

      • qwerty says:

        “it’s not attached to anything. After a few years, that free floating fat starts to sag, ”

        It’s attached to blood vessels, otherwise it’d die. It’s definitely not free floating and does not move around. It can sag though, considering they sometimes put up to 1 litre per buttock that’s not supported by anything . In case of KK and def. Blac Chyba probably twice that amount at least…

      • SeaBreeezy says:

        LOL. I totally agree! Ever since that picture came out about a year and a half ago where she was wearing these bone colored stretch pants. The pic was from behind, and it looked huge, and like she was wearing an adult diaper or something. I kept reading about how great her butt was, but I could never get that pic out of my mind, and it pops up still online. How does anyone, even the guys who like the new huge bubble butt rage, think that looked good? I’m confused.

      • SeaBreeezy says:


        Yes, those are the ones! Though the first time I saw them, they were indoors somewhere, but could have been the same day, or an earlier wearing. Either way… Diaper butt. lol

    • lucy2 says:

      Gives the name of their dumb show a whole new meaning.

    • LAK says:

      This question has been bugging me for some time so a few weeks ago I googled and read all sorts of papers and opinions about it and in a nutshell, it’s a permanent op although size of augmented butt reduces by 30% in the long term as some of the transferred living fat tissue is absorbed.

      No opinion on whether or not it sags, but i’m assuming it’s like breast implants in that 30% absorption leaves sagging skin and that has to be corrected or re-plumped.

      • FLORC says:

        There can’t be just 1 answer because each body is different. And the procedures vary.
        Most common though is the fat relocating. The body has a set way of storing fat. If it has excess fat where it normally doesn’t, and say you transfered fat there from another place your body will over time auto correct itself. And all of this changes even more if the person is dieting and exercising in a way to lose weight.
        Too many unknowns. Just go to the gym and hit all the machines that use your glutes.

  3. Zigggy says:

    Freak show.

  4. Birdix says:

    The suffragettes who campaigned against corsets would be so confused if they could have looked ahead in time.

  5. Dani2 says:

    This waist trainer business worries me, has anyone on this site tried it out/or know anyone that has? I just can’t shake the feeling that you’d be doing more harm than good.

    • Loopy says:

      I have one that a bought a while ago, I bought one size too small so I never got a chance to wear it. When I bought it ,I called it a corset. I think to wear it underneath a dress on occasions is fine but some people even go to sleep with the ‘waist trainers.’

    • MCraw says:

      I have. Honestly, I love it. My posture improves, it assists me in keeping meal portions smaller and spread out thru the day and keeps me warm in the cold winter. I always prefer shape wear under my outfits cuz the clothes don’t bunch up in weird places and its very flattering. It shouldn’t be abused tho. To me, it looks like she got a tinier one than necessary. She needs to stop and be real about her size. I’m sure she busted out of it soon after this pic.

      • Kitten says:

        Does it hurt?

        What does it do for the long-term? Does it actually change your shape?

      • MCraw says:

        It doesn’t hurt if you’re wearing it appropriately sized. Just like it’s not good to wear too-small shoes, you shouldn’t wear a too-small/tight trainer. It’s safer than historical corsets cuz the bones aren’t harsh and rigid; you can move easily in it because of the latex material. I like working out in mine too, helps w my form.

        Long term, it should have no lasting effects. It changes your shape the more you wear it, but once removed, your body eventually goes back to its natural form. Unless you’re using hardcore tactics like Dita Von Teese, it shouldn’t have lasting or harmful effects. Women who say it changed their bodies, upon further research, you see that they’ve always had that general shape naturally or there was some plastic surgery involved that highlights the tiny waist. At least, that’s what I’ve seen so far, so maybe I’m wrong.

        This isn’t the Victorian era; the technology is much safer and it’s used as an aid to weight loss, not the solution.

      • Geekychick says:

        Can I ask a super stupid question? Has there been any analysis about waist-thingie and fertility? I remember that big part of the birth mortality rates were fonnected with corsets and waist training-the organs wouldn’t develop normally or they’d be “moved” in the wrong spot, which made birthing deadlier. I know people don’t wear the waist-cincher from their teenage years on (I hope), but the method is basically the same, so I wonder-if a person wears it all day, every day-is it ok?

      • Davy says:

        There are so many problems with these comments I don’t even know where to start.

        So, I’ll suggest researching the biomechanist Katy Bowman who discusses things like this, kegel exercises, bras etc and will explain bio mechanically why this is a horrible idea.

        There is absolutely negative potential consequences – where do you think your abdominal fat & internal organs go? You push them up (creating potential for a hiatal herniation that can cause DEATH) or push them down, risking inguinal herniation and/or the collapse of organs through the pelvic floor – YES I straight up mean organs falling out of your vagina!!!! This is NO joke. This is extremely detrimental, in fact even just sucking in your stomach regularly is very bad – for digestion, for proper core activation, for fertility, for orgasm potential etc.

        If you need a corset or belt in the gym it means you are not activating your core muscles properly – there are 29 muscles of the core that when functioning, support your alignment (posture is different), both exercise & natural movement, and all the systems of the body. Use your core!!

        Seriously, if you are doing this or considering it, please educate yourself on the effects, Katy Bowman has a blog and podcast and is great at explaining in laymans terms. This drives me crazy.

        Women – our purpose in life is not to have a small waist. If you want great orgasms, the potential to have children and an easier birthing process, a strong body that supports you in the long term and stabilizes your spine, and organ (and therefore, overall) health, please let your belly release and if you don’t like what you see, lose some fat and tone up through HIIT & clean eating!

      • Bridget says:

        Thanks for saying that Davy. There is a very real reason you dont want to use a shaper like that: your core is intended to support your whole body, and when you squish it in like that you can’t engage your abdominal muscles properly. You’re putting yourself at a very real risk for injury or a hernia if you wear one long term.

      • Kitten says:

        Whoa..hey now.

        I was just asking honest questions out of curiosity.

        Thanks for answering, MCraw. Sorry if I unintentionally put you in the line of fire 😉

      • MCraw says:

        Yeah, I agree and those facts come from data showing that happens to women who wear it all day and even all night. That’s why I said it shouldn’t be abused. Dita Von Teese and goth girls are extreme to me, I’m on the other end of the spectrum. I wear one to the gym- the half, not the full- for weight training arms, back, cardio and one on nights out. I like Spanx, slips and other shapewear as well. I love mine and if I’m ever uncomfortable with my fluctuating weight, I remove it. People always go overboard with things from time to time. Your examples are the result of those extremes.

        But hey! That’s just me!

        ETA: all good kitten, the Internet is an extreme place from time to time too lol

      • FLORC says:

        I have 1 that I wear with certain outfits. I’d say spanx are more restricting than this is on me.
        And as a a professional in the medical field and certified instructor for various workouts I feel fine saying if you use it correctly it won’t hurt you.

        The only reason you’d need to wear a corset in the gym though is when recovering from some trauma to your midsection.

        Your list of negatives should be noted to be the absolute extreme end of things. And for most women wearing these “waist trainers” they won’t be using it long enough or tight enough. Many of these corsets come with limits built in as well to stop you from doing damage. It’s not like they’re doing it the old fashion way of wearing it 23 hours a day and repositioning their ribs if not removing some outright.

        You want a smaller waist? Hit the gym and work on your eating habits. You want a certain look with certain outfits to maybe slim a slight stomach bulge. Get a corset with limits built in. There should be no “training” involved. It’s like a very padded bra. It provides a look, but you don’t want that same look all the time so you don’t wear it that often.
        Khloe is an idiot. And in her picture she has a roll of what looks to be skin spilling out the top. If skin is spilling out of anything you wear it’s too tight.

      • Bridget says:

        @FLORC: the Kardashians are shilling for corsets as “waist training” not an occasional shaper.

      • rainbowsandshit says:

        Okay, I have to weigh in here with my comment. I wore a back brace for scoliosis in my lower back. It wasn’t like one of those metal things up around the neck, mine was made of hard plastic and velcro. It came underneath my boobs and up to my armpit on the side I lean towards and it came down over my hips. It was very tight because the idea behind it was to straighten my spine as I grew. I wore it from age 14 through to 17. I hated that thing but had to wear it 23 hours a day.

        The only issues I ever had with the brace was not being able to eat or drink too much soft drink. The only issue I had with child birth was my hips hadn’t opened up enough, meaning my 9 pound son got a bit stuck.

        I’m pretty sure that they would never put someone in a back brace – which is very similar to the corset – if it would do damage to internal organs. I went for check ups every 3 months to check the progress of my spine, never was it mentioned my organs were suffering.

      • FLORC says:

        I know that. And i’m against it for those purposes. I said what I said in a different context. And that these corsets the K’s a pushing are not being used correctly. They appear dangerously too tight. Not that all corsets should be avoided and only bad things will come from wearing them. That’s just not true.

        Back brace and corsets are very different. There’s a greater amount of pressure and angles in a corset. A back brace is formed to you to assist in correcting. A corset manipulates the body into taking an otherwise unnatural form. Look up images of xray torsos to get an understanding on where organs go. Then look at an xray of a woman who has abused corsets to alter her figure. The organs are squished and shifted.

        In short
        It’s Apples and Oranges.

    • Stoner says:

      Yes a million times over to all that Davy wrote. I honestly worry about my teenage daughters being bombarded with these images. She looks like a plastic f*ing mannequin in that picture.

      • qwerty says:

        Plus I hate that it’s called waist trainer. You’re not training anything. You’re taking the lazy route to a slim waist.

        My friend wore a back brace and it’s nothing like a corset. A corset is specifically designed to squeeze your waist tight so it’s smaller than it’d normally be.

  6. Jayna says:

    She did horrible commentary at the Oscars. Horrible. A waste of space.

    • Loopy says:

      They are too self absorbed to be interesting interviewers, she also bombed on X Factor and her mom’s talk show was pitiful. I have now resigned to the fact that they will never disappear. Kris is just too much of a genius, she knows how to keep them around.

    • lucy2 says:

      She was really awful. I somehow got on an E feedback panel, and was asked to give feedback about their Oscar coverage. I complained about her, and pretty much everything. Even their website was bad that day, the red carpet gallery was a mess.

      • CG says:

        I was on an E feedback panel a couple years ago (IDK how that happened!) and I was always getting e-mails asking my opinion of the Kardashians, whether I wanted to keep seeing them on E, etc. I was really hopeful E was getting enough negative feedback that they were just going to let the Kardashians leave when the contract they’re on now expires, but apparently I was wrong. Unfortunately I’m not still on the panel or I would have laid into them about Khloe’s red carpet presence though.

    • Debb says:

      She has an exhausting habit of fiddling with her hair. She made no significant contributions about style or dress – why choose this mumbler for fashion commentary?

    • qwerty says:

      I wonder who’s gonna stop on the red carpet to be interviewed by this person? Seriously, who?

  7. bella says:

    first off – that waist shaper pic is photoshopped to the MAX…
    come on…look at the papi’s shots of her…
    secondly – she got a 4 yr. contract to do the red carpet???
    her performance last weekend for the oscars was embarrassing.
    she had nothing to say and when she did it was foolish, stretching, one dimensional and boring.

  8. Josephine says:

    Just what hold does Kris have on E?? Khloe was horrible. She can barely get a sentence out and she essentially repeated 3 phrases over and over again. The fact that she has this job tells me that either the folks at E are complete morons, or Kris is buying her these jobs. She has no presence at all and isn’t smart enough to think on her feet.

  9. Ugh. No more Kardashians. Kill this idea with fire and ice. No, no, no. It’s bad enough that their fakakta show eats up about 8 hours of E! programming a day; do they need to ruin red carpets with Queen Camel Toe herself?

    • Micha says:

      haha what is fakakta? is it yiddish? sounds like verkackt (i’m german), that’s why i’m asking 😉

    • Pandy says:

      Fire and ice? We need a silver bullet for this bunch. I don’t watch them and still won’t watch them. E is hated on the red carpets anyway because of Fashion Police so it’s a waste of time to watch their coverage.

      • ava7 says:

        This might be a dumb question, but I am not in the U.S. What other channels cover the red carpet? E! is in just about every country, it seems. I was soooo angry when I turned it on to see the red carpet event and saw her. I also, really, cannot stand Kelly Osborne either. I want to see the dresses, just not them. What’s a girl to do?

  10. Amy says:

    She is damaging her internal organs but if there’s one thing you can say about the Kardashian women it’s that they don’t care abut their health so long as they can alter their bodies to fit their fantasy.

    Seriously, with the level of procedures happening between all the sisters and their Mom I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a “Very Kardashian Tragedy” special one day.

  11. GiGi says:

    I don’t even understand how this is possible. And I’m not talking about her butt. I’m talking about this E deal. WTF? She was the worst during E’s Oscar Red Carpet & you could tell everyone on the panel with her shared my sentiments.

    And the waist cinching does do damage to your body. So dumb.

    • Bridget says:

      I don’t get it at all. I thought Kardashian ratings were slipping – is E! just the worst negotiater ever?

      The red carpet commentators turn over quickly. I doubt Khloe will last long.

      • lucy2 says:

        I don’t think E has anything else at the moment. For a while they had a slate of dumb reality shows and Chelsea Handler’s show, but nothing else now that I know of.
        Plus I’m sure Satan’s Little Helper Kris has something she’s holding Seacrest and/or other E executives hostage with.

  12. Amy says:

    Also Khloe sucks as a host. All her supposed charm and humor vanishes the second it’s not for her reality show which is why people still ask her and her sister what they do.

    They have no talent outside of being themselves on film. As for the Jenner girls, Kylie is working hard to beat Kim at her own game so I have doubts she won’t be involved in E’s web soon. Kendal…still basic but she’s on the gravy train with biscuit wheels but the lifespan of a model is short so we’ll see how it goes.

    • swack says:

      I thought Kendall did not want to do any more reality shows because of her modelling. Guess we will see what happens.

    • Pandy says:

      What else do they have to offer except reality shows? The girls aren’t even high school graduates, so really, what “career” options await them? Besides overseas nights with rich old guys.

  13. Grace says:

    Let’s just go back to binding out feet too while we’re at it. Jeez…these people. Reversing women’s progress in the world, one Kartrashian at a time.

    • sionainne says:

      Shhh! Don’t give them any ideas! Though it would be fun to watch them balance their giant asses on teeny tiny feet.

      Methinks Khloe will end up looking like a black widow spider if she doesn’t stop with the waist training thing.

  14. Amy says:

    Could she have said ‘shaper’ anymore times in that picture???

    No seriously Khloe squeeze it in two more times! You really got to sell that product you got money to endorse. Smh.

  15. Grace says:

    Let’s just go back to binding out feet too while we’re at it. Jeez…these people. Reversing women’s progress in the world, one Kartrashian at a time.

    And, do you think they are so “popular” because of schadenfreude? (or however you spell that magnificent word!?)

  16. Lynne says:

    I believe they have a new deal with E because the station hasn’t developed any other shows that are decent but i don’t believe those numbers.

    • lw says:

      The numbers seem about right when you break it down. 4 years. The contract includes all of them (including Seacrest, whom you know makes at least 20%). So that would be roughly 3 million each. I’m sure Kim gets triple what the others make, so… I’d guess a million a year for the underlings and more for Kim, Kris and Ryan. The show doesn’t have blockbuster ratings, and is routinely beaten by RHOA, Love & Hip Hop, etc… Meh, they make their real money with all of the crappy endorsement deals.

  17. Nicolette says:

    Ugh. We are never going to be rid of this wretched family are we? It’s mind boggling at this point. The red carpet has a gaping hole in it since the sudden passing of Joan Rivers and Khloe is not the remedy. Joan was the queen and left some big shoes to fill. Why not just rename the channel to K! since they seem to dominate it anyway?

  18. Kiddo says:

    So based on the Rancic comments and this addition, E decided to make the red carpet a reality shit show. Joan is turning in her grave. She was mean, but she could make cogent points and jokes. Now the red carpet coverage is the joke.

    • Bridget says:

      Who would you rather: Khloe Kardashian or Star Jones?

      • Kiddo says:

        Rather what? Put in a Florida sinkhole? Anything Kardashian.

      • Bridget says:

        Clearly, the question was “who would you rather snuggle with on a cold winter’s night”

        The E! red carpet is always a shit show. We associate it with Joan because she really was the originator, but there have been so many ridiculous people doing that commentary and none have been good. And E! isn’t shy about rotating them out. Though I do like Kathy Griffin and to this day find it hilarious that she got herself banned from E!’s red carpet.

  19. platypus says:

    “Pinocchio Butt” always makes me laugh… I don’t see the appeal, but if she’s happy, whatever. I don’t really see it being much different than breast implants, besides the practical aspects (which, ahem.. I’m not going to get graphic about… you know what I mean!).

  20. Mar says:

    That pre show was awful! I hated seeing Khloe there.

  21. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Everything about this makes me ill.

  22. Dawn says:

    Wow. She is sooo bad at that gig I wouldn’t think anyone would hire her for anything. JHC what does PMK have on this network anyway. Comcast can suck it because I won’t watch anything that has a Kardashian, Jenner or West involved with it. Heck I don’t even buy products that they endorse. What a sad state of affairs this country has fallen into.

    • AG-UK says:

      And I won’t even buy a magazine with someone on the cover I don’t like (:
      I can’t watch E anymore as it’s all them, it use to be my guilty pleasure living here in the UK but no more.

    • Petee says:

      No joke.I stopped watching the E!Channel years ago and stopped buying tabloids because of them also.I use to read Rona Barrettes Gossip growing up.I remember when Star and Us first came out.But because of this family I stopped buying all the tab’s too.pretty sad.Now we have a young bunch of girls who want to be them.That’s the sad part of all this.

  23. InvaderTak says:

    It called a CORSET. They have been around for an eternity! Stop renaming crap to make it sound new.

    Again, the Oscars will continue to be irrelevant, as awards and as a ceremony, until people start getting rid of the clowns.

    And had she elaborated on what exactly are Oscar colors??? I’m dying to know what they are and how in the world she’s an expert.

  24. nicegirl says:

    Wow, that is not a good decision. She is not a good red carpet host/commentator.

    They should hire Tim Gunn. He would be awesome on the red carpet. Or even Andy Cohen. I understand these dudes are not the same network, but better choices regardless.

  25. Katie says:

    Surprisingly a lot of people wear corsets… I’ve always thought she had a great figure. *shrugs*

  26. Diane says:

    The moment she came on the red carpet coverage I switched over to ABC. She cannot talk. She is annoying. E continues to cram that family down my throat to where I have begun to deliberately avoid that network.

  27. Susan says:

    I just don’t understand the fascination we have with this family. Khloe really sucked at the last two award show Red Carpets.

    • word says:

      As a Kardashian, they don’t need to have any talent. As long as they stay in the news, they are making money. It’s a very unfair world.

  28. kri says:

    She was wretched on the red carpet coverage. Wretched! The only reason that the Kardashians are still around is because we love to hate them and they know it. They will do anything to stay on TV. Nothing is too low for them.And I’m just calling Seacrest “Dr. Frankenstein” at this point, because he helped to create this monster. It is so mind-boggling/depressing.

  29. OriginallyBlue says:

    I really don’t understand, are people really this easily entertained? There is nothing interesting about any of these people, yet they have had a show for years and are getting 4 more. Gawd that is sad.

  30. Nick says:

    What happened to Rob?

  31. Trillion says:

    I fear for the young girls that watch these women and think this is something to aspire to. Unhealthy in every regard. But they are so ubiquitous. It’s like their gigantic fake asses eclipse anything of quality that could have a chance at occupying the same space.

  32. Val says:

    So basically she is trying to get us to believe that her waist is smaller than her thigh?

  33. word says:

    1. Khloe is horrible on the those red carpet specials. She knows nothing about fashion and has nothing constructive to add to the conversation.

    2. I think Kylie will get her own show. She is by far the most popular in that family (with regards to teens and young adults).

    3. Poor Rob. Always left out.

  34. bondbabe says:

    This idiot is so stupid that she doesn’t even use the proper term: it’s not SNATCHING your waist, it’s CINCHING!!!

  35. Reece says:

    I turned the channel when she came on at he Oscar red carpet. I guess for the next 4 years i won’t tune into the channel at all.

  36. FingerBinger says:

    If E wants a Kardashian on the red carpet they should get Kanye. His fashion commentary would be interesting.

  37. Elisa the I. says:

    I like her blond hair. That’s all I’ve got 😛

  38. Green Is Good says:

    Sasquatch has lost her damn mind. She will NEVER be a size 4. Her ass alone look like XXL. She’d do better with intensive psychological counseling for her body dysmorphia issues .

  39. Kloe has made an ass of herself

  40. Frosty says:

    Everytime I read “pinocchio butt’ I just giggle. Doesn’t her lower back hurt?

  41. Miss M says:

    Where’s George?!

  42. BetseyLu says:

    I thought these people might go away after this season of Keeping up. Ugh, another FOUR years!!? They are never going to go away. Who even watches those shows anymore?

  43. Anon says:

    NBC which owns E has come out and said the 100 million is grossly exageratted and is not 100 million. What this is is Mrs K putting some PR out there for the branding and for other engagments to try to get more money, not from E but wants you to think they get top dollar and they dont..its all PR and unusual for NBC or anyone to comment on any contract. This family is all fake. Wouldnt it be nice to know how many followers are bought from apps or duplicate followers with several names

    • Orly says:

      Yeah, I don’t believe that for a second. The whole appeal to reality shows is that they are relatively cheap to produce. There’s no way the Kardashian nitwits are getting paid Friends money for their shit shows.

  44. lisa2 says:

    I don’t believe that story at all. And E is apparently going to Merge with Access/ Extra or one of the other competing shows. I saw a story about it somewhere. It would be completely Bad Business for E to give someone like her that has been untested that kind of money. So I call BS on this until I see it actually happening.

    and I don’t see any REAL star wanting to talk to the Kardashians on the RC.. LOW RENT DEAL.

  45. Dr.Funkenstein says:

    Does anybody really care what Khloe Kardashian thinks about anything? Really?

  46. DoMaJoReMc says:

    Well, it’s official. I now have some free time for the next 4 years.