Dr. Oz: ‘without question, the show will survive’ people calling me a fraud

Dr. Mehmet Oz has come under fire with a fresh wave of criticism (although the first wave never stopped). Nearly a year ago, the Senate scolded him for his lack of accountability in shilling all sorts of untested products. His enthusiasm can be infectious, and viewers tune in on the regular. Part of the entertainment factor of the show is watching Oz excitedly jump up and down in his scrubs. He’ll endorse almost anything, although he claims to have stopped shilling diet products. That’s a wise move, since many of those products were supported by bogus studies. Some of the products he endorses haven’t been tested and could be dangerous.

Oz still holds a position with Columbia University as a professor (in the department of surgery). His colleagues aren’t pleased to share their ranks with a guy who uses his influence to shout about “miracle cures” and “metabolism game changers.” They’ve accused him of acting under conflicts of interest and supporting products without “evidence-based” benefits. Oz fired back with an entire episode where he trashed his critics, saying “some of them have their own conflict of interest issues.” Oz is not denying that he’s a quack, just that there are other quacks in the room, so stop picking on him, okay? He’s proud of his “flowery language, and he’s a “cheerleader” for his audience.

Oz sat down with Mr. Glib himself, Matt Lauer, to talk about how his show will go nowhere because America needs him:

Dr. Mehmet Oz, who has been under fire by fellow physicians seeking his dismissal from Columbia University’s surgery department, says he is confident that his TV show will outlive the current controversy.

“Without question, the show will survive it,” Oz told Matt Lauer in an exclusive interview. “I want to keep doing the show for as long as I can because I think we played an important role in making America a better place.”

Last week, a letter signed by 10 physicians urged Columbia University to cut ties with the surgeon. On Friday, USA Today published an op-ed penned by Oz’s Columbia colleagues who attacked the “Dr. Oz Show” for its promotion of weight-loss products and other items they view as questionable.

Oz said he stands by using words like “radical” and “miracle” while discussing all but one health topic on his show. “I’m proud of all those words. There’s only one time that I have not been proud of and that’s the understandable frustration that has been expressed about weight-loss supplements,” he said. “I wish I could take back the words I said about them. This is a flawed area with lots of fraud, both in the research and in products. And we no longer talk about them. I haven’t talked about them in a year.”

During an earlier interview with NBC’s Stephanie Gosk, Oz defended his show, saying its purpose was to discuss “the good life,” not medicine.

He emphasized the point with Lauer, saying his show is “much broader than a medical lecture series.” Oz said his show embraces “unconventional practices” like the power of prayer or how wellness is practiced in China. He said last week’s letter from doctors criticizing him as careless came from individuals who “have agendas,” specifically biases against genetically modified organisms, an areas he has supported. “I think they were unfair in not wanting us to have that conversation,” he said.

“You’re not going to please everyone, that’s not my goal. My job is to help America understand the opportunity towards health,” he said. “The show has to be much broader than what might take place in a doctor’s office…I completely respect why so many of my colleagues might have a difficulty with that, but I’m also appreciative that many of them do understand why that’s important.”

[From Today]

As I’ve said before, Oz really needs to switch up his show format. If he’s serious about never talking about diet products again, that’s a good start. He’s not in much danger of losing his syndication deals because people enjoy watching him fanboy for a solid hour. I think he does need to choose between maintaining his Columbia tenure and being a talking head. Doing both isn’t working, at least not the way he behaves on his show. Or he could simply switch focus for a good chunk of his episodes. Maybe feature a bunch of cooking episodes. The man gets excited about pasta.

Dr Oz

Dr Oz

Dr Oz

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet; screencaps courtesy of Today

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

46 Responses to “Dr. Oz: ‘without question, the show will survive’ people calling me a fraud”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nayru says:

    Of course it will! Since when has good solid science stood in the way of sensational anecdotal pseudoscience from various charlatans?

  2. aims says:

    I appreciated Dr. Oz when he broke into the scene, it was nice to hear medical explanations it normal talk. However, things got weird when he because a walking endorsement.

    • LadyMTL says:

      My thoughts exactly. I respect him as a surgeon but his talk show is a joke. The man is nothing more than a shill now, he even tells people that if they buy a product from his website they can get discounts. (You think he doesn’t get a cut? LOL). And don’t get me started on the ridiculous stuff like green coffee beans and raspberry ketones.

      I wish he’d focus more on real health issues instead of worrying about busting belly fat and so on, but I guess it doesn’t make for “good TV”.

      • Michelle says:

        @LadyMTL, “I respect him as a surgeon”

        I feel like him being a liar destroys his credibility completely. If he had any concern for how he looked as an MD or surgeon at this point, he would own up to his lies and admit he messed up and promise to fix his show so that is actually based on real science and not just him plugging for ratings like the fame-whore he has become. I get it that he was the wonderful education, the status of at one time being deemed the best cardio-thoracic surgeon in the country, and all the years of experience to boot, but how can we believe he is still credible in anything if he acts like a complete quack in the name of ratings? Obviously Oz’s show is more important to him than his medical career is. I find him to be a questionable character now, and if I were to have heart surgery and found out he was performing it, I wouldn’t feel nearly as secure as I would’ve before he jumped the shark.

      • LadyMTL says:

        @Michelle I totally agree with you, he has for sure put his show ahead of his medical career. I think his credibility vanished a long time ago, and I can’t help but eye-roll when he starts blathering on about the latest liver detox or whatnot.

        At the same time, when he does get a bit more serious he can be very informative and helpful. I saw a segment a few weeks ago where he had operated on a man who had a severe blockage in his heart and I remember thinking “Now THIS is why I can still respect him, even a bit.” If only he’d just stick to things like that…

      • Kiki04 says:

        I have no respect for the guy, especially not as a surgeon. The surgeons who are out there talking to the press as much as he is are not the ones you want actually operating on you. Especially something as intricate as cardiac surgery.

        Believe me, this guy is a joke in the medical profession. I pray that Columbia gets their act together and drop him.

      • Sherry says:

        5 Years ago my German Shepherd had a cancerous growth on her face. The vet said when he operated he couldn’t get it all because it had wrapped around the nerves of her face. The day before, I saw Dr. Oz talking about saffron and how it was shown to kill cancer cells, so I asked the vet if it was okay to give it to her. He said it was fine and also advised that another patient (a poodle) had inoperable cancer it’s owner gave it Noni juice and the cancer disappeared. So for 6 months after her operation I gave my dog an egg with saffron and 2 tablespoons of Noni juice. She will be 11 years old in a few months and the cancer never came back. That was then.

        Now, I think all he’s concerned about is ratings and bringing in the moolah. For a while I worked at a locally owned health food store and people would come in patterns asking for a particular odd product that I’d never heard of. 9 times out of 10 I would hear, “Dr. Oz says blah, blah, blah so I want some!”

        We started referring to him at the store as “The Great Wizard.”

  3. eggplanthoKiddo says:

    The show is a fraud, so of course calling it that won’t make a difference.

  4. Ms. Lady says:

    I hope it doesn’t.

  5. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Ugh. I’ll never forgive him for talking me into those big horse pills for weight loss that did absolutely nothing. I take responsibility for my own foolishness, but I thought (at the time) that he was credible. Thanks, Oprah!

    • Kiddo says:

      James Frye was the least fraudulent person Oprah thrust upon us.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Yeah, she should just set their pants on fire before they go on stage.

      • Esmom says:

        Seriously. The way Oprah chose to dress him down vs a million other guests still doesn’t sit right with me.

      • Kiddo says:

        I know. Think about the damage Frye created, which was nil, merely an embarrassment to Oprah, versus the f_ckery of Snakeoil-Miraclecure-salesman Oz, Dr Shill and the guru who killed people in the sweat tents. Never mind that Gail is like the human embodiment of an Ambien.

    • Paris says:

      I know! And don’t forget Oprah also gave us Dr. Phil, another attention-seeking blowhard.

  6. Santolina says:

    He needs to put his money where his mouth is by giving back that fraudulently earned money. Maybe he could donate some of those millions to a worthwhile cause related to fighting obesity, diabetes or heart disease.

  7. dr mantis toboggan says:

    This dude gives me the creeps in a sinister way

  8. taterho says:

    This guy and Dr. Phil need to go. Their programs are dangerous and creepy.

    • maeliz says:

      Dr. Phil is pretty much a talk show . He’s not telling the world about “miracle cures” and endorsing untested products. Dr. Oz needs to go

      • taterho says:

        Oh I know maeliz.
        Just with the “Dr” in front of Phil he thinks it makes him respectable and he gets to do or say whatever he wants on his show. He takes advantage of his guest’s emotional pain.

      • littlestar says:

        Dr. Phil definitely takes advantage of peoples situations and trauma, but he does offer to get help for those who actually need it.

      • Tammy says:

        I like Dr. Phil because he’s brutally honest and quite frankly, some of the loons that appear on his show need that honesty. But he does help those that genuinely need it. And his books are on the money. His talk show and books made me take a long look at myself.

  9. Dirty Martini says:

    Once upon a time I worked for a large, non profit, faith-based healthcare organization. I was in charge of the agenda development and attaining keynote speaker for an annual meeting of management. Having obtained some big names in the past for a reasonable amount because they resonated with our mission, I decided to pursue Dr. Oz. His price tag? $100,000. When I balked, I was informed that MRS. Dr. Oz would be available for $10,000. MRS Dr Oz? Are you kidding me?

    Do not be fooled. The man is all about the cash. Not about the mission of healthcare.

    Team Columbia Naysayers.

  10. funcakes says:

    I love the episode when he became Chris Hanson and chased down some guys using his name to promote items without his consent.

    Maybe they should have just cut him a fat check.

  11. Lisa says:

    I think the attack on him backfired since he exposed some of the doctors criticizing him as frauds themselves.

    • Bridget says:

      Honestly, I think it’s more the case that the folks that follow him don’t care about things like “evidence” or “facts” or “science”. This is a man that was reamed by the Senate for goodness sake. Nothing ‘backfired’, it’s just that his audience is looking for a miracle.

    • perplexed says:

      I agree. When I looked into why they launched the letter against him, I found that the doctors criticizing him seemed to be up in arms about him advocating for GMO labelling and they’re part of some group that is corporatized. I think there are other things you can criticize him for, but advocating for GMO labelling isn’t something I’d frown upon.

  12. Michelle says:

    This guy is such a quack, and it is such a shame that he sold his soul for ratings and money because once upon a time he was a reputable doctor who helped people understand medical issues and conditions in simple terms. Of course the show will survive, because Oprah’s psychotic Stans are fiercely loyal to anyone and anything she endorses, but I don’t see how anyone can truly respect him anymore.

  13. Sofia says:

    People bash about Homeopathy and all the alternative medicines but seriously, having a doctor doing what he does is what worries me because it’s just dangerous (and greedy and disgusting) . But you know, he is a doctor so he can. Ugh!

    • SnarkGirl says:

      Any doctor who prescribes or endorses Homeopathy should have his or her license revoked immediately.

      • Sofia says:

        Your opinion is based on what? Have you looked behind the smoke and mirrors convencional medicine shoots at us? No responsible doctor will tell you to rely only on homeopathy but an open minded one will endorse it as a complement, which is different. And by the way, do you know what much of the conventional medicines have in it? It’s all in nature but you can’t really buy a patent on that and pharmaceuticals know it very well.

      • sketches says:

        Amen, SnarkGirl.

      • lisa says:

        i actually wouldnt trust a doctor who wouldnt recommend homeopathy in certain situations

    • Sofia says:

      I understand that people feel they should be suspicious and with reason. But sometimes reality challenges your beliefs. Convencional medicine doesn’t always treat the causes, it deals with the symptoms and many times doctors just don’t offer any answers or solutions to that, so you get chronic issues. Do you know that regular GPs don’t have education in nutrition? They don’t really believe that food can work as medicine, most just tell you the regular stuff. They never tell you about ginger and turmeric and how they are like an explosion of anti-inflammatory ingredients that can be used in prevention or while taking antibiotics for example so it speeds up recovery. This is simple stuff and harmless. Do your homework with an open mind.

  14. Bridget says:

    I miss when ‘news’ interviews would ask real, hard questions. Now it’s just an opportunity for a celebrity to shill their side of the story.

    And beware any doctor that shills “miracle” products. There are no short cuts, and the people that say otherwise are just trying to sell you something.

  15. ann says:

    Does he really care about making America a better place or making his wallet bigger?

  16. boredblond says:

    I think he’s probably a fine doctor, but if you believed all the scares he tosses around, you’d go crazy. Case in point, the stupid mac/cheese thing..the wash post did good job debunking that…and the addition of celebs who show up to talk medicine–just as their new film/book/show is released–is just reaching too far into Ellen land.

  17. maeliz says:

    When people see a doctor, they assume he’s going to know what he’s talking about. Especially if he is a professor and has his own show. Unfortunately the guy endorses anything that is too good to be true.
    What a greedy guy.

  18. Giddy says:

    I think he once was a good doctor, but he sold out big-time. I know that I certainly would not want to be one of his surgical patients; I’d be scared that at crucial moments his mind would be on his latest endorsement scheme, or signing autographs.

  19. Sam says:

    I lost respect for Dr. Oz when the whole “arsenic in apple juice” thing happened. I knew SO MANY mommy friends who lost their collective minds over that one – and why not? You have a medical doctor on TV telling you a terrible poison is present in your kid’s juice. The problem was that he didn’t specific that the arsenic present in the juice was organic arsenic – totally harmless to humans, occurs naturally in soil, and safe. Inorganic is the killer. The FDA actually called him out on that one. He basically created a panic without any good reason at all – and for what? Ratings and publicity. What a stooge.

  20. Aurelia says:

    My husband covertly sent away for that fat buster Garcinia extract. He swears by it. Now he is the last guy I would expect to rate a product like that.

    When all is said and done I do respect Dr. O because at least he has impressed into our minds that YOU need to be your first health advocate. Get informed and work with your health practitioner.

    Now somebody of my mothers generation still thinks doctors ALWAYS know best. She thinks they are gods! No, they can be flawed at time so you need to research as well. The differece between me seeing my general practicitioner here in New Zealand and me then seeing a holsitic general practicitioner doctor is bloody worlds apart. They are not in the same universe.

  21. His show may survive, but I certainly hope that his tenure, and his cardiac surgery practice, do not. this is NOT the guy you want replacing your aortic valve. He might try to sprinkle some turmeric on it or something.