Sarah Palin was fired from Fox News for a second time: is she ‘over’ yet?

FFN_NYC_SNL40thAnn_021515_51654873

Sarah Palin has been especially crazy in the past year. Her word salads have gotten more epic, she lost her mind when people criticized her for NOT telling her children to stand on dogs, her family got into an insane, bloody and tacky brawl in Alaska and even Palin’s most vociferous defenders were jumping ship after Palin spoke like a malfunctioning fem-bot at CPAC earlier this year. So is it any wonder why Fox News has canned Sarah Palin for the second time?

Fox News has not renewed its contract with Sarah Palin, a spokesperson for the network confirmed to E! News Wednesday. Politico, which first reported the news, added that Palin and Fox News amicably parted ways June 1. Palin, who unsuccessfully ran for Vice President on John McCain’s ticket in 2008, has yet to comment. The former governor of Alaska, 51, is expected to make occasional guest appearances on Fox and Fox Business, and will appear on other networks and cables. She also has a show on the Sportsman Channel.

Fox News first hired Palin as a commentator in 2010. Per CNN Money, her contract was reportedly worth $1 million a year, making her the highest-paid political pundit at the highest-rated channel in cable news. Her tenure ended after three years, but months later, Palin returned to Fox News as a paid contributor.

Don’t feel too sorry for Palin, who boasts 4.4 million Facebook friends and 1.15 million Twitter followers. To her followers’ surprise, she gave her Facebook page a makeover at midnight. It now features a cover photo and a quote from Palin’s announcement speech in Dayton, Ohio: “I didn’t get into government to do the safe and easy things. A ship in harbor is safe but that’s not why the ship is built.” And though she is not running for political office herself, Palin will remain heavily involved in GOP congressional and gubernatorial primaries for 2016. Per Politico, SarahPAC is donating to 40+ candidates this week alone.

[From E! News]

It is my hope that even Fox News realizes that the SS Palin has been a leaky, crazy, tacky and budget vessel from the start and it’s time to jump ship permanently. But I fear that Palin still has some die-hard fans and Palin will still make a ton of money from being a “pundit” on Fox and other conservative outlets.

After Palin was sh-tcanned from Fox, the Fivethirtyeight blog posted this amazing chart of “The Receding of Sarah Palin.”

palin2

Photos courtesy of Palin’s Facebook, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

96 Responses to “Sarah Palin was fired from Fox News for a second time: is she ‘over’ yet?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. PhenomenalWoman says:

    Can I get an “amen”??

    • KellyBee says:

      Amen.

      Sarah has to be pretty messed up to be fired from Fox News a second time.

      • Esmom says:

        My thoughts exactly. And amen.

      • puffinlunde says:

        I guess the news of Bristol “abstinence” Palin’s second pregnancy without a wedding is not helping her conservative credentials at Fox

    • Snazzy says:

      AMEN

    • Katy says:

      AMEN!!!

    • beautifulDay says:

      I just tried to buy an RV and returned it a week later. The percentage of Palin fans who produce chemical plastic hydras in order to explore the outdoors are just not my tribe. The politcal wrongness just oozed off of every experience with that thing. The negative Palin JuJu was palpable. I’m going back to a tent.

  2. tracking says:

    Please, please, please let her be over.

  3. Bre says:

    I will forever side eye McCain and his camp for bringing her into our lives…

    • Jem says:

      imagine how McCain feels

      • minx says:

        He was questioned not that long ago–within the last year, IIRC–and said he had no regrets about his VP choice. He’ll never publicly admit what a boneheaded choice it was. Privately, who knows.

      • Esmom says:

        Oh I think he knows. I think he even knew during the 2008 debates when he had a painful, frozen smile plastered on his face half the time. He seemed ready to bolt at any moment. Yet his stubbornness would never allow him to admit all that, I think.

    • littlemissnaughty says:

      Still, to this day, I do NOT understand what the man was thinking. HOW does this happen? He had a chance, a real chance. With the right team and the right running mate … like it or not, he appealed to a huge number of voters. But then he unleashed this one on the country and watched his campaign implode. And her. Amazing. I wonder if sometimes he is stopped in hallways or men’s rooms and people whisper “How could you?”

      • Emily says:

        I know. And the only logical thing I can come up with is that he must have decided he simply didn’t want the presidency anymore.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        He wanted Lieberman, which would have been rather radical, but his advisors said he would lose the party base, as if they would vote for Obama, so he caved and left the decision up to them and they went with Limbaugh’s choice

      • H says:

        I was going to vote for McCain until he put Palin on the list. I was a registered Democrat at the time. He lost my vote. Can’t have that crazy woman anywhere near the White House.

      • BearcatLawyer says:

        One of my friends, a pretty die hard Republican, claimed that McCain chose her very deliberately. According to her, McCain had not forgotten how the Bush campaign had repeatedly insinuated during the 2004 primaries that his adopted Bangladeshi daughter was actuallly his love child with an unknown black woman. Allegedly he also was angry about attacks related to his wife’s prior pain pill addiction. Because he felt so betrayed by his own party, he unleashed Sarah Palin on the world as revenge, knowing it would almost certainly lead to Barack Obama’s election in 2008.

        Now I have no idea if this story is true or not, but it is one of the more logical explanations I have heard about why McCain – a seasoned politician – chose someone so clearly clueless and incompetent to be his VP running mate. On the surface it looked like an inspired choice: a younger conservative woman with gubernatorial experience and a seemingly stable marriage and family. But within days of her selection, it was clear that Palin was a huge liability for the party and by then, it was arguably too late in the campaign to convince swing voters and independents that McCain-Palin was the better bet.

        I will say this for her: she has milked her 15 minutes for all they are worth and then some. But it is time for her to sit down and be quiet.

      • AntiSocialButterfly says:

        I’m sorry, I just have to leave these here:

        http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/john-mccain-foreign-policy-even-worse-bush

        http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2008/04/28/22422/mccain-children-hospital/

        http://crooksandliars.com/2008/07/15/did-you-hear-john-mccains-womanrapegorilla-joke

        Disclaimer-I did vote for O (as the lesser of two evils, sad to say) specifically because of my concerns about foreign policy.

        His stance on Gitmo and drones is depressing as hell. It just goes to show that no matter the benevolent aspirations of a starry- eyed newcomer, the mill just churns out more of the same grist. It is terribly disillusioning.

        That said, Sanders!! Warren!!

      • Bridget says:

        Warren!!!

        I truly wish that we could see some real, viable Republican candidates. McCain/Palin was just sad, and was Mitt Romney REALLY the best that they could do last time around? The 2 party system doesn’t work if both sides aren’t producing real presidential candidates. My personal theory is that the Republican self-appointed “Kingmakers” are so unpleasant to deal with that they scare away the best potential candidates.

      • Esmom says:

        Bearcat Lawyer, I have never heard that, it’s intriguing but I don’t think it’s true. I think the ill-conceived choice of Palin was his team’s and not his. And they didn’t realize the extent of their error until it was too late. Although you could argue that they could have changed their choice of running mate once they realized what a dimwit she was, but I could see why they’d be reluctant to do that and stayed the course, disastrous as it was.

      • lucy2 says:

        I think you’re right Bridget. Unless you play ball with the old GOP leaders and shy away from anything even remotely moderate, you aren’t going to get their support to get elected.

        Of the GOP nominees that round I though McCain was the best choice, but when he picked Palin, my opinion of him and his team really tanked. I’ve always thought they imagined the Hillary supporters would flock to her just because she was a woman (never mind they are political polar opposites) and she was extreme right, a part of the party that didn’t love him. It was those 2 reasons, NEVER because he actually thought she’d be good at the job or would bring something to the table. She was an campaign tool, nothing more, and I found that very scary.

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        @ BearcatLawyer: Wow, what a theory. I have to say, it turns my stomach like not much else how First Ladies or potential First Ladies are often treated by the public/press.
        I do think he was probably badgered into picking her and is now cursing the people who inflcited her on him and the public. They most likely just did a pi**-poor job of vetting her because the crazy was so close to the surface. How could they not see??? They probably overestimated her intelligence and their own ability to give her appropriate media training. It was such a spectacle.

        In general, they made a good call trying to find a younger conservative woman who pulled McCain to the right on some issues but HER? You cannot convince me that there was nobody else.

        What I will never ever understand is how a candidate can win or lose an election based on abortion and guns. Yes, those topics are very important to U.S. voters, understandably. But because we don’t have a gun problem and abortion – while technically not legal – is not subject to prosecution, we have such different election topics.

      • Bridget says:

        @lucy2: the irony is that the GOP Ballplayers are so far from the pulse of actual, normal Republicans that they’re making themselves unelectable. Remember when they thought they’d just skip the middleman and run in a true religious conservative like Huckabee? Or when Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani were supposed to be the political stars? Any whiff of “moderation” and they pressure Republican candidates to kowtow to the ultra-conservative talking points, and all that manages to do is drive more moderate voters toward the other side. I wouldn’t want to sink the time, money (actually, LOTS OF MONEY) and grueling effort into campaigning if I had to deal with Karl Rove & Rush Limbaugh all the time.

    • holly hobby says:

      I know deep down he probably regretted listening to his advisors but he will never publicly admit it. His daughter literally went “WTF” in her book about the campaign. I’m sure the whole family did a head slap more than once during that campaign.

      • Alex says:

        Honestly like many others McCain was a serious option for me when voting (even though I lean left). I liked a lot of his ideas and he’s actually pretty moderate on many things.
        A huge reason for the Palin mom is because the GOP was trying to swing the female vote that was left disappointed when Hillary lost the nomination to Obama. They wanted the women vote so they brought a woman on the ticket. Too bad that woman is dumb as a bag of rocks. That immediately through my suport to Obama. Before that I had no idea which way I was voting (same with my roommate) and it was my first election so I was really into looking at every debate and such. But yea I wanted Palin no where NEAR the WH

        But SNL was never funnier. Thanks Tina

  4. Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

    She wasn’t fired. She’s clearing her schedule so she can run for president.

  5. Bridget says:

    I don’t know that Sarah Palin will ever be 100% over, because there’s always an audience for someone that tells people what they want to hear.

    • Kitten says:

      Sadly, this is the truth.

      Much like the Duggars will always have a support base.

      • Bridget says:

        And so the best thing we can do is to just not take her seriously. When we actually argue with her we validate her as though she’s worthy of our time. But when we treat her like the joke she is we take away any power she could have.

    • Josephine says:

      Being a hate-monger is huge business right now. That, and humiliating yourself ala every reality loser out there. Since she covers both bases, I think she’ll find work.

    • I Choose Me says:

      Ain’t that the awful truth.

    • mayamae says:

      @Bridget, you’re right about that. Some think the country can’t survive without Palin’s words of wisdom. Sample of said wisdom:

      “GOP leaders, by the way, y’know the man can only ride ya when your back is bent. So strengthen it. Then the man can’t ride ya, America won’t be taken for a ride.”

  6. OhDear says:

    I’m sure she’ll either have a reality show or participate in one soon enough.

  7. GingerCrunch says:

    Well done, Kaiser! LOVE your continuation of her sea-faring metaphor! Lolz

    • Esmom says:

      I know, me too, it was genius. I spit my tea out at “SS Palin has been a leaky, crazy, tacky and budget vessel from the start…”

  8. LAK says:

    The more you hear from Palin, the more you question McCain’s judgement.

    • Bridget says:

      I will never forget the “hillbillies in Neiman Marcus”

    • Christin says:

      He either had very poor judgment or trusted his people too much (in terms of proper vetting). More than five minutes of research and just talking to her should have raised some flags.

      • holly hobby says:

        The problem was he never met or interviewed her before he announced her selection. His team poorly vetted her and half assed the background check. McCain met her after she came on board. This was documented in Game Change – a great book btw! I was never interested in politics until that particular election. The cast of characters were awesome and there was so much juicy gossip (John Edwards scandal).

  9. Melody says:

    I keep asking the same thing about the Kardashians. Vapid attention-seeking seems to have a long lifespan.

  10. Liberty says:

    Thank god. I haven’t felt safe since she stopped monitoring Russia from her kitchen window. Now she can get back home, pour a cup of tea and keep saving America.

  11. Lilacflowers says:

    Sarah, you are not IN government; you haven’t been IN government for a long time; and you accomplished nothing when you were there. It is not difficult to balance a state budget when the Feds heavily subsidize everything.

    No, you are in politics, which accomplishes nothing

    • Esmom says:

      I also was thinking that. Yeah, there’s a huge distinction between being in govt and being in politics. Not surprising she doesn’t really know the difference.

    • lucy2 says:

      Excellent point.

  12. Tiffany says:

    Next up Dancing with the Has Beens. You know it’s coming.

  13. Adrien says:

    I don’t want her to be over. She’s the gift that keeps on giving. I want more of that hopey-changey thing.

  14. Penelope says:

    That cut-out-shoulder thing she’s wearing is so cheap-looking.

  15. Lara says:

    I am an avid fan of this site, but the liberal bias tends to counter my “loyal” status. There are many on this site who love Obama and I would challenge them to count off what he did to improve this country. He will not drill for oil in the US, the government has increased the debt to ranges we have never seen. He has race baited and not supported our police. He is a disaster of a president on so many levels, period. Palin wants to decrease government, drill for oil in the US and lower the debt.

    I am a fiscal conservative who supports pro-choice and gay marriage, There are many boxes that we all fall into regarding politics. There are many on this site that find it troubling for all who support this president and knee-jerk reaction to anything fiscally conservative or reads as “Republican.”

    Palin was eviscerated by the press with misnomers. SNL had a skit that said “I can see Russia from my back yard.” This was all taken as truth by the media. Sarah Palin never said this, but the sheep who follow the non-news shows quote it as gospel.

    • Josephine says:

      You can do so much better as a representative of the Republic party. She’s not it – she’s in it for herself, always has been, and her story line about the unfair liberal media is old and sorry.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      Palin DID say that Russia was visible from parts of Alaska in her first interview with Charles Gibson and for that reason, she should be credited with foreign policy experience. SNL merely parodied that and the news media was picking up on Palin’s actual quote, not the parody. Palin has tried to pretend ever since that she never made that ridiculous statement.

      As for drilling for oil in the US, sure, but only if the oil is nationalized and kept here instead of allowing multi-nationals to take our oil and sell it elsewhere in other countries, which is exactly what has happened with every single previous oil drilling/pipeline proposal

      • Ruckhappy says:

        Technically, Palin is right. There are two very remote islands in the Aleutian chain that are theoretically visible to each other. One is American territory and the other is Russian.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        I wasn’t disagreeing about the proximity of Alaska to Russia; a cousin was stationed in the Aleutians for two years but living that close to Russia didn’t make him an expert on foreign policy and it didn’t make Palin one either, which was her claim.

    • Bridget says:

      I said this about Donald Trump the other day, but it seems fitting here too: you know how you’ve gone too far into partisan politics? When you think Sarah Palin has a point.

      Also, Sarah Palin did indeed say that her foreign policy was that she can see Russia from her back yard.

      Now, had you name-checked Alaskan and Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski I’d think you were interested in a real discussion. But instead you used the phrase “race baited”.

  16. burnsie says:

    Is Fox really the highest rated cable news channel??

    • FingerBinger says:

      Yes ,it always beats msnbc and cnn in the ratings.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      It does but the demographics are interesting. Very few people get their news from cable television now. Just as the internet and Twitter have pretty much destroyed newspaper circulation, they’ve done the same to television news but with less attention. Fox News pulls more viewers, and mostly for its commentators, not its actual news reporting but the majority of its viewers are over 65 years old.

  17. anne_000 says:

    “I didn’t get into government to do the safe and easy things.”

    Uh… she left government because it was becoming unsafe and hard for her, especially with the various investigations starting to bloom or the threat of them.

    I doubt Fox News is going to let her go completely. I’m sure they’re going to ask to come back from time to time to explain complicated political issues in over 5000 misused words or more…

  18. iheartgossip says:

    She is a white trash idiot using what is left of her womanly wiles to stay in the ‘spotlight’. White Trash Family.

  19. Jayna says:

    The once highly respected John McCain should hang his head in shame for an hour every day as penance for foisting this Alaskan Hillbilly grifter on us.

  20. Jayna says:

    Oh, my God.

    “Bristol Palin just threw cold water on what’s supposed to be a joyous occasion … being pregnant.
    Palin’s in the early stages of her second out of wedlock pregnancy, and this time she’s full on grumpy, saying she knows it will be “a huge disappointment to my family, to my close friends, and to many of you.”
    Bristol says she’s “trying to keep [my] chin up on this one.”
    Sarah Palin’s daughter was engaged to U.S. Marine veteran Dakota Meyer, but they broke things off last month. Bristol didn’t say if Dakota’s the dad.
    Bristol was full of piss and vinegar, saying, “I do not want any lectures and I do not want any sympathy.”

    • Julaine says:

      I guess that “abstinence is the only 100% effective form of birth control” rhetoric has a serious flaw.

    • Jen43 says:

      I can’t believe how unhappy she sounds about this. I wonder what the deal with Dakota is. Is he not the father, or iis he father and bailed when he found out she was pregnant? Man, I actually feel sorry for her.

    • Christin says:

      Isn’t this a big surprise (not really). Makes the recently canceled wedding all the more interesting.

    • Julaine says:

      I guess I shouldn’t be taking such cynical glee at the news. But the hypocrisy just….burns. Coupled with the fact that she gets $262K a year to lecture others about “abstinence” while defiantly claiming that SHE doesn’t want to hear any lectures directed at HER choices.

      It does raise certain interesting questions about her abruptly cancelled wedding, doesn’t it?

      • Jen43 says:

        Wow. She really pimps abstinence? How did I not know that? I take back what I said about feeling sorry for her. What a hypocrit. I wonder if she practiced abstinence with the ex-fiancé and got pg by somebody else. This is going to get good.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      “I do not want any lectures and I do not want any sympathy.”

      Well, I’m definitely not going to give her any sympathy, she deserves none, but she has a real nerve whining about lectures when she has been taking money to lecture people about abstinence WHILE opposing real sex education in schools.

  21. Argirl says:

    Bristol is pregnant again. The hypocrisy is astounding.

    • Liberty says:

      What will the Candies Foundation say now? Of course, she made that quarter million five years ago. Is she still their speaker?

      More to the point: What Would Jeb Bush Do!!!??? 😉 is this a part of the reason why Foxed News showed Sarah the door?