Angelina Jolie thinks ‘nemesis’ Madonna adopts for fame

oscars arrivals 4 220209
There’s another chapter in the years-long battle between Angelina Jolie and Madonna. Interview evidence suggests this stuff started in 2006, when Madonna gave a really bitchy interview to Time about her adoption of David Banda. A reporter had asked Madonna if she was “jumping on a bandwagon” by adopting David. Madonna said, “Look, I could have joined the U.N. and become an ambassador and visited various countries and just kind of showed up and smiled and looked concerned. But that’s not getting to the root of the problem – and by the way, neither is building orphan care centers and giving people food and medicine… I’m not interested in going in there like a dilettante and being an idiot and going ‘Ok, I’m going to build 10 orphanages and I’ll see you guys later!’”

A few months later, Angelina responded to Madonna while doing an interview with a French magazine, “I would never take a child away from a place where adoption is illegal,” Angelina said, but added that she’s “been horrified by the attacks [Madonna’s] been subjected to [for adopting Davie].” Angelina never spoke out about Madonna’s most recent adoption escapade, keeping silent about all of the drama regarding Madonna’s failed adoption of Mercy James.

Stuff has been testy between the two ever since. From appearances, it seems like Angelina has spent the past few years completely ignoring Madonna’s existence, while Madonna laps up media comparisons between herself and Angelina, probably imagining that she and Angelina are on the same humanitarian/motherly plane of existence. I should mention that Madonna can give as many bitchy, self-serving interviews she wants, but there are still very serious questions about the finances of her charity, Raising Malawi. At first, Madonna drew criticism because the charity seemed like some kind of money-laundering front for Kabbalah-related activities. The latest evidence suggests that Raising Malawi isn’t even registered as a charity, so all of the millions of dollars being raising is completely in the wind.

Now Us Weekly and In Touch both have variations on the latest Madonna-Angelina saga. Us Weekly’s piece is basically what Angelina thinks of Madge (not much), but it does include one of the funniest denials ever from Madge’s rep:

Angelina Jolie has no mercy for Madonna! A source close to the actress tells Hot Stuff that Jolie, 33, has told friends privately that she’s infuriated by the Material Girl’s adoption efforts in Malawi.

“Angelina thinks Madonna is a blatant copycat and that she’s coming from the wrong place,” says the insider of Jolie.

“Angie sees what she and Brad do as being about saving a child, but she thinks Madonna does it for publicity.”

And adopting kids isn’t the only thing Jolie thinks Madonna has done for fame: She’s told pals she believes Madge has dabbled in lesbianism “for attention and press,” whereas Jolie got involved with Jenny Shimizu at a “confused” time in her life.

Says the source, “Angie’s appalled at even being mentioned in the same breath as her.”

Asked about Jolie resenting Madge, Jolie’s rep tells Us, “This is absolutely not true,” and Madonna’s rep says, “I can’t imagine Angelina said this! More media attention would be the last thing that would be an incentive for Madonna.”

[From US Weekly, print edition, May 25 2009]

“More media attention would be the last thing that would be an incentive for Madonna.” Of course, Madonna. Because we’ve never met you, we’ve never seen your media shenanigans played out on every tabloid and newspaper, no, you would never do anything to get press. Someone give Madonna’s rep a clue, I think the jig is up.

Anyway, In Touch’s cover story this week is another Bermuda Triangle story, all about Brad sexting Aniston. The story is extensive, with lots of hilarious pictures of Brad “looking over his shoulder” to see if Angelina is watching him sext Aniston, I suppose. They also have several little mini-stories about how Angie and Brad are growing apart, and all of the “evidence” that proves it. One of the stories is about how Angelina’s pissed that Brad was partying with her “nemesis” Madonna:

Brad likes to escape his unhappy home with solo trips to a local pizza parlor and nights out drinking at parties. On April 30, Brad went to photographer Steven Klein’s birthday party in New York and hung out with Angelina’s nemesis Madonna.

“He got drunk on margaritas,” a witness tells In Touch.

Madonna and Angelina’s friendship has been icy ever since Angie criticized Madonna’s adoption of son David from Malawi in 2007. “I would never take a child away from a place where adoption is illegal,” Angelina told Gala magazine.

[From In Touch magazine, print edition, June 1 2009]

Ah, you see? For In Touch, it’s all Angelina’s fault. Because that’s how they roll. Just one more point, about the whole lesbianism thing from Us Weekly – who are either of them kidding? Madonna was playing with the public (for show?) lesbianism angle before Angelina even talked publicly about her lesbian relations. To many, they were both doing it for attention.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

63 Responses to “Angelina Jolie thinks ‘nemesis’ Madonna adopts for fame”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. patty phee says:

    blah blah blah.
    who cares? let madge be a copycat if she helps some poor kids and people.

    if that’s true…jolie really is stupid.

  2. Zoe (The Other One) says:

    Angie Jo is having a laugh isn’t she. Pot kettle black much love.

  3. Annie says:

    Oh the things these tabs come up with.

    All I know, is that Angelina’s got more people talking about other countries. Ever watch “Street Smarts”? Do you know how many people are unaware of anything beyond their own state?? A LOT. It’s really really sad…and hey, famewhore or not, she’s still providing aid to other countries. And you may think it minuscule, but every bit counts.

    Even a click! (You know! thehungersite ? Where you can just click to help?, that’s still a good thing!)

  4. ChristinaT says:

    and we’re supposed to assume that jolie’s intentions are good and madonna’s are bad because she said so?

  5. anastasiabeaverhausen says:

    Uh, what exactly is wrong with giving people food and medicine, Madonna?

    Madonna is a twit.

  6. texasmom says:

    This sounds so very much made up to me. . . I suspect these two scarcely ever think about each other.

  7. Pam says:

    Pot meet kettle?

  8. barneslr says:

    Well, no shit. She DOES adopt just for fame. Poor little David is just a fashion accessory to her.

  9. ChristinaT says:

    “Angelina Jolie has no mercy for Madonna! ‘ kind of an ironic statement considering maddona was trying to adopt a child named mercy :-p

  10. kiki says:

    In other news
    water is wet

  11. lisa says:

    Sorry, but I would believe Angelina over Madonna any day.

  12. kap says:

    They have both admitted they don’t even know each other. Jolie did say she keeps on the “right side of the law” re: foreign adoptions, meaning she gets a list of countries where it’s legal to adopt, instead of picking a country where it is not and splashing a lot of money around and getting the kid anyway. Think Madonna’s intentions were honorable, and was a little sad for her when the second attempt failed, but she knew the rules about residency and once again disregarded them. Now the question is, has Madonna hurt overseas adoption attempts for all US citizens with her blatant disregard of these rules?

  13. daisy424 says:

    For the love of…get your roots done Madonna!

  14. SolitaryAngel says:

    So, when did giving sick, starving people food and medicine stop helping the problem?

  15. Boom says:

    I wish i can get adopted by Madonna then my Dad and I will be the same age

  16. carta says:

    I loathe Angelina, but I don’t think she was “playing” at lesbianism for attention. She had an actual same sex relationship with Jenny Shimuzu that both sides spoke about. Some people really are bisexual and Angelina seems to be. Madonna, I feel like her relationships with women have been more rumored and innuendo’d.

  17. ash says:

    I feel like I need to watch A League of Their Own just to remember why or if I ever liked you at all Madonna.

  18. karen says:

    I think Angelina has been doing UN work for almost 9 yrs. now–way before Brad and Jen were even married, so I tend to buy her side of it more than Madonna.
    I always felt Madonna always stole other people’s thunder whenever something became popular. Sorry, Madonna, once a poser, always a poser.

  19. jennifer aniston says:

    i thought aj has does not have friends, so who the hell are these sources

  20. boomchakaboom says:

    Surely Madonna would never court publicity! The woman is practically a hermit…and my life story will soon be a Lifetime Movie Classic starring Cher.

  21. Chicamorena says:

    Angelina started working for the UNHCR in 2001 and she is still working for them to date. Her most recent trip overseas to a refugee camp was about a year ago when she visited Afghanistan.

  22. ferdis says:

    jennifer aniston: i thought aj has does not have friends, so who the hell are these source

    JAMES HEAVEN!!!

  23. Canuck says:

    >>Uh, what exactly is wrong with giving people food and medicine, Madonna?<<

    What she said is that building 10 orphanages doesn’t get to the ROOT of the problem, and she’s 100% right on that.

    You aren’t going to deal with the causes of poverty by handing out medicine, food or anything else. That’s just “treating the symptoms” not the disease.

  24. Ophelia says:

    She was “confused” about Jenny Shimuzu? God, what is so wrong about being bisexual? If she really said that I have lost respect for her, and I hope Jenny has too. Ugh, and my dying crush on AJ ends now. Damn. Still going to watch Firefox and drool though. *sigh*

  25. wildflower says:

    >>”What she said is that building 10 orphanages doesn’t get to the ROOT of the problem, and she’s 100% right on that.”

    >>”You aren’t going to deal with the causes of poverty by handing out medicine, food or anything else. That’s just “treating the symptoms” not the disease.

    So basically if Angelina can’t wiggle her nose an make world hunger and lack of proper medicines completely disappear, then her UN work is useless? “Treating the symptoms” in this case pretty profound. I guess no one should ever donate to any food pantry or any clothes drive, then.

  26. Judy says:

    Do any of us really think that Angie gives a rats ass what Madge does??? I dount it , they just have to start this kind of crap so they can say it is an all out fight just like with Brad sexting his ex lol They need to find some real stories lol and stop making this crap up.Do you really believe that Angie is talking about her personal shiot to these people??

  27. Daria says:

    I’m sure this is another lie. The tabloids like to pit two stars against each other because it sells magazines. To bad people don’t realize their tricks.

  28. sisi says:

    If Angie thinks she is on the same level as M she needs to think again! Angie has been famous for a few years now for stealing the golden boy from Americas sweetheart. Once that goes tits up she will fade into the woodwork. M has been relevant for 30 years!!! Angie and her man slave aren’t actors, they are celebrities- tabloid fodder. M and Angie Voight are one and the same when it comes to adoption though.of course its for publicity!! If Angie thinks we don’t know her adoption of Maddox wasn’t illegal as hell she must think we are dumb a$$es. Sure pay some poor parents big bucks for their child. Classy. And both are fame-whores. As Warren B famously said of M “you don’t live off camera”. Same for both of these fame whores.

  29. Lindsay says:

    Karen –
    Feb 2001 Angie started working for the UN.
    Brad and Jen met in 1998, married July 29, 2000, according to a minute of online research. So no that is not true, but why would that make her more or less credible? Why bring Jennifer into this if it is the first time in a long time her name hasn’t been brought up in an article about Angie?

    Canuck – I agree but is adopting a kid getting to the root of the problem? What was Madonna talking about?

  30. Canuck says:

    >>Jolie did say she keeps on the “right side of the law” re: foreign adoptions<>;Canuck – I agree but is adopting a kid getting to the root of the problem? What was Madonna talking about?<<

    Sounds to me like she was irked about being accused of “jumping on the Jolie adoption bandwagon” and got snarky because of it. I can understand that, it’s not as if Jolie is the first star to ever adopt, but she has managed to co-op the issue as if she invented the idea. I think Madonna’s comment was more along the lines of “I’m not doing this for publicity, just like I don’t fly into poor countries and do photo ops, unlike some others”. Sounds to me like she’s calling AJ out for being a bit of a fake…

  31. fluffy too says:

    lover’s tiff???????????

  32. hmm says:

    Taking one child out of a whole country full of unfortunate people isnt going to solve the problem either. Whats wrong with treating the symptons. atleast your helping a whole lot of people not just one.

  33. jodie says:

    Oh please… I have never seen in an on air or print interview where Angelina has ever said anything negative about anyone. If my statement is not accuate please post the comment. This is just a story to try and create a made up rivary between these two women, who do not know each other. Sick. This is not done with men, just women. No wonder womne are so catty towards each other. We allow the media to do this and never call them on it. Some of the comments prove this. This is a stupid tab story and like 99% of them it is not true. I guess the game of let hate Angelina and find any story to stick on her is still going on.

  34. Missy says:

    no surprise that they wouldn’t like each other. makes perfect sense.

  35. paranel says:

    Madonna is and always has been the most self centered calculated bitch around. What did you think she had in mind with all these adoptions? She wants to be in the news since she doesn’t sell records like she used to decades ago. Sad with tons of money you can still live in poverty emotionally. She will sell her soul to the highest bidder , oh wait , she already has done that.

  36. sonia says:

    AJ reps denied this story in US weekly, this is BS . Also Madonna’s rep says it wasn’t true

  37. Canuck says:

    Oops, my last post was edited a wee bit. I guess there are details that aren’t allowed to be posted about here, LOL

    Note to moderator… could you also delete the bit that I was referring to, aka “the right side of the law in adoptions” please? My answer doesn’t make much sense with that bit left in, since the response to that was edited out. Many thanks

  38. Canuck says:

    To hmmm: nothing wrong with helping people. But if the point is to eradicate poverty, treating the symptoms is like putting a band-aid over skin cancer. It keeps it out of sight for a while, and you can pretend that all if fine and dandy. It does nothing about getting rid of it though.

  39. DiMi says:

    1. Typo in the last line of 3rd para.

    2. I used to mock Madonna’s adoption efforts, but I have to say, little David always looks loved, healthy and happy. Meanwhile, Zahara, Angie’s African child, always looks miserable and unkempt and marginalized compared to Shiloh Brangie’s white biological child. Even her estranged hubby Guy Ritchie seems to shower David with love and affection. Zahara always looks lonely and sad. In terms of the well-being of the child, Madonna wins this one.

    3. I actually find this story credible. All US mag reports is hearsay from Angelina’s friends, which is not “evidence” but US has a pretty good track record of not reporting false stories. (Unlike the enquirer and others.) Of course, Angelina denied it because she had to.

    4. It’s a joke that Angelina doesn’t adopt for publicity. She collects children like purses or shoes.

  40. Jayne says:

    Madonna has her issues but AJ should not even talk. She courts publicity at every turn and always looks like a cat with butter when she is in the glare of cameras. Also she should remember that the head of the agency where she adopted maddox is in jail for child trafficking. Her adoption of her first child was down right illegal.

  41. momo says:

    famewhore x famewhore = explosion

  42. whatever says:

    Jayne, get your facts straight. The woman used by AJ was also used by thousands of others to adopt children. Only after this woman was investigated, then people knew she was not on the up-and-up. Madonna, on the other hand, KNEW from the get-go that her adoption of David and Mercy were both illegal. She just didn’t care, b/c laws don’t apply to Madame M. HUGE difference.

  43. hello says:

    Jolie has been doing charity work for a VERY long time (over nine years now). Madonna is nothing more than a copycat. When something gets popular, NOT ONLY does she jump on the train, but she PRETENDS that she was the one who started the whole thing. SO typical of her.

  44. DiMi says:

    Author: You still have a typo in the last line of paragraph 3.

  45. Wresa says:

    “I used to mock Madonna’s adoption efforts, but I have to say, little David always looks loved, healthy and happy.”

    Exaclty. How do we know what the relationship is between David and Madonna? And if I were to judge, I would say they look like they really love each other!

    Honestly, even if he was an accessory, I think it would still be better than a life in Malawi. Regular food and medicine is a luxury for most over there, let alone love and attention.

  46. Canuck says:

    I just don’t quite get the “thinks she does it for fame” bit. It’s not like Madonna is some starlet who no one knows about and who needs to do anything other than exist to get a lot of press coverage. In fact, she shut down the coverage on her divorce pretty quickly. I’m willing to bet that if/when Brangie separate, it will be in the press a lot longer than a month or so. And I agree with another poster here, David looks like a happy camper in any photos that make it into the press, as do her other children.

  47. Les says:

    Wresa, so you think it’s ok that little David be an accessory for a rich woman. I think that’s sad to devalue where they he comes from that bad. I sure some good comes from their country.
    Any way I don’t believe this story. Sick of these stupid lies.

  48. sarcra says:

    “Jolie, 33, has told friends privately”

    Angelina Jolie has friends???

  49. NKS says:

    Both of these women have fame and fortune. If they use that to help others somewhere in the world have a better life, so be it. Of course, that doesn’t mean they DON’T enjoy the attention is generates for them..after all they are media darlings. Looking humble with a smile before the cameras is normal behavior.

  50. jodie says:

    I am a bit concerned. Why are the Jen Aniston fans on this thread. Why are they not asking about Jen. Your idol has not been seen in days. She was asked to leave the set. I wonder what is wrong. Maybe she is using drugs again. Maybe she is so depressed she had to be put in a hospital. Maybe she has a mysterious disease that no one knows about. Maybe she is off gettng some plastic surgery.

    OMG. what is wrong with Jennifer Aniston. She seemed so happy promoting her movie. Maybe she is sad that her fans were spending too much time on Brad/Angie and forgot they were supposed to go and see her movie.. I wonder if her family has been called. Maybe she is really sick. i hope they can help her. Her fans must be so scared. I am sure when she is seen again she will pretend to be OK, but it will just be an act not to scare everyone. But the truth is she is in danger and everyone around her is scared. OH my what if she got pregnant by some man and something is wrong with the baby.. OMG what are we to do… Please someone Please.. One of her fans on this site. you must go and find out what is wrong. YOU must be an expert. You are all able to learn so much about Brad/Angie.. surely you can find out what terrible thing is going on with Jennifer.. Maybe she will not be able to finish the movie. JLO has a film that is very similar.. This could be another reason she is so depressed and thinking of hurting herself.

    Jen fans please go and find out what is wrong..

  51. someone says:

    8:06?? You need some serious help for your mental issues..why are you so concerned for the well being of Jennifer????Are you a Brangaloonie???I don’t think you took your medication today, someone should do an intervention…Get the white coats and take you to the mental hospital for evaluation..hurry..

  52. gawgaw says:

    If Madonna had adopted a baby first, then Angie would be accused of jumping on the “Madonna bandwagon” !
    Also, I think that Angie does charity work, etc, because she feels guilty for doing dumb shit in her past and she can’t get over it.

  53. Canuck says:

    >>>I am a bit concerned. Why are the Jen Aniston fans on this thread. Why are they not asking about Jen. Your idol has not been seen in days. She was asked to leave the set. I wonder what is wrong.<<<

    Why are you dragging Aniston into this? You know, the Aniston who has FINISHED FILMING and so has quite logically left. Yeesh!

  54. BlueSkies says:

    Madonna has been ripping others off, a major copy cat. It is because she is insecure. She saw the positive press for Angie, Justin & Britney and lamely jumped on what she saw as the media excitement. She stopped developing around five to seven years old when she lost her mom. She’s obvious to so many but being that she’s one-dimensional in thought she doesn’t know we have evolved above this. Sad. She’s actually a tragic figure.

  55. Magsy says:

    I guess it just proves that even famous women can still be catty and bitchy. Funny, when Mia Farrow adopted all her children it wasn’t seen as glamorous, everyone made her out to be crazy. Anyway a lot of the public think both Madge and AJ are adopting for the wrong reasons, so in a way AJ is preaching to the choir while also throwing stones from her glass house.

  56. SureShot says:

    oh yes and im sure that angie does not do it for publicity????how stupid!she is no freaking better. at least maddona spends times with her children! madonna is right. who is anige the skank to judge anyone?little miss break up 3 mariages,cuts herself, does not “trust” her “boyfriend” because she stole him away……but yeah she shows her face for a few hours angie for publicty looks all upset-being she does ACTING. only GOD can judge.mine is ONLY opinion.

  57. karen says:

    Madonna spends time with her children?
    What lies. Her own chef just did an
    interview where he said her children
    had to schedule time with her around her four hour-a-day workouts, her busy music and me-me-me life. You are full of lies, surestupid.

  58. lisa says:

    Jodie, the crazy Aniston fans have nothing better to do than spew hate at Angie. Jen’s movie tanked, her love life, which includes running after disease-infested pretty boy Mayer, has failed, and she is running out of options. Her fans live vicariously thru her, so they are on suicide watch as we speak. Crazy Jolie fans, on the other hand, mostly live at Just Jared. You might want to visit there.

  59. Pufft says:

    @KAIZER: Speaking of Angie, here is something of interest (to you, no doubt) to look into.

    Today is Shiloh’s birthday (I’m not privy to this information because I’m an obsessed fan, but because I happen to be born today, as well – yes, HAPPY BIRTHDAY to me). Interestingly enough, the date given by the Welwitschia clinic in Walvisbay, Namibia, where Shiloh was born, is May, 28 (I believe it was during the early morning hours. Don’t ask me the exact time).

    I distinctly remember this because I was in Namibia at the time, and there was great confusion of the actual dates because the Chief Superintendent at that private hospital was quoted saying that the child was born on Sunday early morning, 28 May, 2006. The Namibian government was even considering making the day a public holiday, but because May has the most public holidays on their calendar (and Namibians pride themselves on not being celebrity fanatics), it was decided that Shiloh would instead get citizenship if she ever decided to take it up (seriously doubt it though because Namibians are not allowed dual citizenship and she would have to revoke her US citizenship if she takes it).

    Of course, USA is 6 hours behind Namibia (in the summer) and currently 5 hours behind. So, it is very possible that Angelina was working with her American watch (which would explain the time difference – although really, it’s not accurate as she was NOT born in the USA).

    What would be interesting to find out is whether Angie took the day off on the set of Salt to celebrate her baby girl’s birthday. Maybe there are pictures available as we speak.

    (I’ve left this comment on another thread, just in case you don’t see this one)

  60. Bek says:

    Pufft–keep “puffing” on your joint. Your book–I mean your post, would indicate that you ARE an obsessed fan! “And in other news today, though I really don’t care, I heard that Angelina made a bowl of soup for brad. Though I doubt that it was vegetable soup because I read somewhere that he doesn’t like tomato soup…so it was probably a cream base. I like cream based soups, and I just had some the other day. But I’m not an obsessed fan or anything. So I’ll post this around a few other places. Don’t miss it! Can you get me the exact recipe that she used…..blah blah blah! LOL!

  61. Bek says:

    Both women thrive on manipulation of the media. And they aren’t the only ones to flaunt their children in public. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that there are many other stars who have managed to keep their children’s lives private. It’s REALLY not that hard. If this is true, it just goes to show how petty they really are.

  62. julie says:

    angie is full of it, she adopting for publicity. Madonna is a Icon for many years, she doesn’t need press like angie does. Nobody reported on angie before she hooked up this brad.

  63. Hi,

    Does anyone know if the stories about Madonna’s reported trampoline obsession are true?

    Thanks

    Lou