Angelina Jolie isn’t ‘done’ with Hollywood, she’s ‘mulling’ over some offers

Well, this is interesting. We’re coming off of an explosion of Angelina Jolie coverage, some of it good and some of it bad. When Jolie is speaking on her own behalf, the coverage is great. When Page Six is swearing a blood oath to Team Brad, the coverage is not so great. But what happens when The Hollywood Reporter chimes in with some interesting industry gossip? Page Six’s story was about how Brad Pitt has “custody of Hollywood” and that Hollywood people are tired of Jolie’s whole deal. THR seems to indicate that Jolie’s relationship with some Hollywood people is actually tenuous, but that Jolie is still getting offers. I don’t know? Ugh. You can read the full THR piece here. Some interesting tidbits:

Is Netflix going to back up Jolie’s ‘First They Killed My Father’? Noticeably absent from the low-key [Cambodia premiere] affair — held in the Cambodian city of Angkor — were Hollywood A-listers, including Netflix’s chief content officer, Ted Sarandos, who, sources say, paid a whopping $25 million for the Khmer-language release, due out this fall, with an awards-qualifying rollout from a to-be-determined theatrical partner. Netflix executive Sarah Bowen stood in for her boss, joining the evening’s hosts, Cambodia’s King Norodom Sihamoni and Queen Mother Norodom Monineath Sihanouk.

Jolie’s next project: Sources close to Jolie say she is mulling a number of acting offers including reprising her role as the vengeful fairy in Disney’s Maleficent 2 and is in active development on two large-scale Universal projects: an adaptation of Simon Sebag Montefiore’s Catherine the Great and Potemkin: The Imperial Love Affair and World War II espionage drama The Spy Who Loved (based on Clare Mulley’s 2013 book). All the while, she is quietly prepping what may be her next directing vehicle: an adaptation of Alessandro Baricco’s 2004 novel Without Blood, which chronicles the cruelties of an unnamed war. She also has signed on as a producer on Disney kid pic The One and Only Ivan.

Is Jolie interested in acting at this point? …She is long overdue to move back in front of the camera. Her last work as an actress was voicing Tigress in last year’s Kung Fu Panda 3. All the while, she has turned down safe bets like Wanted 2 and a Salt sequel. But there are signs that Jolie is no longer a negotiate-at-all-costs star to the studios. In August, Fox chairman Stacey Snider pulled the plug on the actress’ involvement with Murder on the Orient Express after months of to-and-fro over her script notes. “Stacey said, ‘Thanks, but we’re moving on,’ ” says a source. As to talk that she might play the eponymous role in Universal’s remake of The Bride of Frankenstein — once such a high priority that the studio was willing to bear with her on 2015’s By the Sea (a debacle she directed and starred in opposite then-husband Pitt that cost as much as $25 million and earned a mere $500,000 domestically) — that now may be years down the road, as the studio is still searching for a writer.

She still has Sony’s Shoot Like a Girl in the pipeline: It’s the true story of Mary Jennings Hegar, an American Air Force major and helicopter pilot who served three tours in Afghanistan before challenging the military’s combat policy, which excluded women. The film, initially penned by first-time screenwriter Frank Baldwin, is getting a new draft from Oscar nominee Jason Hall (American Sniper). “It’s the kind of role she gravitates toward, because it’s a courageous woman,” says the film’s producer Ellen Goldsmith-Vein.

The Cambodian premiere cost a lot: Her Cambodian odyssey may mark her last red-carpet for a while, and possibly the last one funded by Netflix. Arranging for travel, accommodation and the other requirements of the star, her family and her entourage, who flew in on a private jet, is estimated to have cost the company more than $1 million. Netflix was so willing to appease its star that Jolie’s 15-year-old son, Maddox Jolie-Pitt, received an executive producer credit on the film. Holding the premiere near the famed Angkor Wat temple complex was a logistical nightmare, which one source called “her Tropic Thunder moment.” The plan was hatched by Jolie and the two women who, multiple sources say, have become her closest confidantes, Lady Arminka Helic and Chloe Dalton, once aides to former British Foreign Secretary and Conservative party stalwart William Hague. Helic, a survivor of the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s, last year was named to the international relations committee of England’s House of Lords.

[From THR]

THR goes on to say that Jolie still has a Hollywood team in place, with an agent at UTA, an entertainment lawyer and her back-again manager Geyer Kosinski. There are rumors that some in Hollywood thought Jolie was trying to wage a “smear campaign” on Brad and that there could possibly be a “backlash” against Jolie for that. Brad still has projects with Netflix too, which is probably why Netflix is treading very carefully with Jolie right now. Oh, and Brad and Angelina were once going to do that Richard Leakey bio-pic together but now, obviously, they are not going to. The technical reason is “budget issues,” as in Angelina wanted to direct it and her proposed budget would have been $130 million. So, no, it probably won’t happen any time soon.

Photos courtesy of Getty.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

141 Responses to “Angelina Jolie isn’t ‘done’ with Hollywood, she’s ‘mulling’ over some offers”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. crazydaisy says:

    Can’t get enough (of this coverage!) *swoon*

    • ronaldinhio says:

      I love seeing her and her children but all I read is attack attack attack against Jolie
      Why do we keep pretending this has nothing to do with Pitt and his cronies?

      • sunshine gold says:

        Maybe Brad is the mastermind behind this, but I don’t think she’s very liked in Hollywood, so there’s potentially a lot of sources for leaks. (And this is pre nightmare drama with Brad – I think she’s always been a tad difficult.)

  2. ell says:

    i remember reading an interview she did with domhnall gleeson a few years ago, in which she was saying she was kinda thrown into acting because she came from a well known family in hollywood, but that now she didn’t feel that was quite what she wanted and she preferred directing. i thought it was a shame, because i think she’s a better actor than a director.

    • paolanqar says:

      I think she is a terrible actress but a decent director with so much to learn.
      She is an amazing human being though and no one can deny that.

      • ell says:

        i agree on the amazing human being, but to me she’s a good actor. maybe i have low standards, but she always makes me feel things, and that to me is good acting.

      • Merry says:

        Yes. I can only think of two roles that I thought she did great at and she won an Oscar for one of them. Most of the other stuff seems to comprise of her mugging with eyes wide opened and a half smile in some sort of half seduction half amusement gambit. Her more emotional scenes like Changeling are just terrible. As for the directing, I’ve only seen By The Sea. Its very beautifully shot but the film critics said that was the cinematographers signature look. I really didnt care about the protagonists and frankly I was more inpressed by the old bartender and the just married girl because the actors had charisma. I dont begrudge her success since she is at least doing something meaningful with it but I really dont think she should be taking acting roles. If I were her, I would focus on doing what Brad is doing; identify stories and directors who otherwise wouldnt stand a chance and help greenlight those movies.

      • tracking says:

        I agree with paolanqar. She should not do the writing and I haven’t been interested in her acting since A Mighty Heart, but she’s a competent novice director with room for growth. The problem was jumping into overly large-scale projects before she was ready, along with the disastrous BTS (and there, the script was the real problem imo). If the Netflix film is well received, she could get another chance, but the diva/entourage/script control demands I’m sure are very offputting. She’ll have to recalibrate there. And enough with the war films ffs!

      • KB says:

        She’s better in popcorn fare like MAMS, Maleficent, Salt, etc. I’ve only seen By The Sea of the stuff she’s directed, so I’ll reserve judgment on that one.

        Also, the article says FTKMF will potentially have an awards season run, does that mean there will be a theatrical release or that it will be pushed for the Emmy’s?

      • lucy2 says:

        I’ve never cared for her as an actress except for Girl Interrupted. As a director, I’ve only seen Unbroken, and I didn’t finish it – I have huge admiration for Louis’ story, but I couldn’t get into the movie at all.
        I could see her doing Maleficent 2, and then sticking with smaller, more personal projects. I hope she keeps directing, we need more women behind the camera, but I can’t say I’m eager to see what she does.

      • Luca76 says:

        I don’t think she’s a terrible actress. She was great in her early work. I think the problem is she’s too big and she’s terrible at picking roles. She would have fared much better in the studio system where they basically curated an image and roles for their big stars. She’s great at curating an image but terrible at finding scripts that suit her.(Mostly because there are very few movies with strong female leads made these days whereas in the 90’s that was kind of a thing). I honestly haven’t seen any of the films she’s directed yet so i don’t have an opinion on her films.

      • Keaton says:

        I don’t think she’s a great actress but she has tons of screen charisma. She’s truly a star. As for directing: Too early to tell but I’m sure she can grow and become stronger And yes she’s an amazing human being.

      • Carmen says:

        She was marvelous in Maleficent. I also liked her in MAMS, Salt and Wanted. She was totally miscast in The Good Shepherd and the Lara Croft movies were plain silly. I haven’t seen her in anything else.

    • sarri says:

      I think she’s a great director but a terrible actress. I really love Unbroken.

  3. SaraR. says:

    Another hit peace. The tone of that article, from the begining to the end, is like the source was Page Six.
    How that nobody is pointing all these articles as Brad’s smear campaign of her? The week of her premiere all these are coming out? The timing is super suspicious.

    • Steph says:

      Just because they dont praise her every move doesnt mean they hate her. Honestly one million for a premiere its a lot… and its not like its a big movie.

      • SaraR. says:

        Well, read the whole, long article. There is absolutely nothing positive there. The tone is sarcastic and insulting. It doesn’t need to be glowing – I read many HR articles that were written about successes or failures of actors and movies and they were written in a matter of fact tone. This was a smear job.

      • Merry says:

        How do you mean? The only negative points in that article seem to be 1) insiders think she tried to smear Brad 2) Fox ditched her for a film over too many script change demands and 3) Jon Peters said he wouldnt do Leakey with her over her production demands that doubled the budget. Everything else seems devoted to listing all the other offers she is juggling. Its basically just a story about her onscreen comeback.

      • BJ says:

        Read the entire article.
        So why did Netflix spend a million for one red carpet event, is that normal for a Netflix premiere of a film with no stars in it?

    • KB says:

      It’s saying she has a lot of potential projects which is the opposite of the Page Six piece. It’s not fawning by any means, but I don’t think it’s fair to call it a hit piece. The Page Six article definitely was though.

    • Luca76 says:

      I don’t think it’s consciously a hit piece. I think Hollywood is a sexist and basically immature place and they pick sides in nasty breakups. They are basically picking Brad’s side and betting on Brad.Partially because he’s a man and issues like substance abuse and potential child abuse are no biggie as long as it doesn’t affect work. Partially because he’s producing and seems to be completely invested in Hollywood longterm. Partially because Angie is over 40 and doesn’t seem all that interested in focusing solely on being a Hollywood property and I think that more than anything is what threatens Hollywood folks about her. The fact that in certain ways she’s ‘bigger’ than Hollywood. It was the list of the Scott Rudin emails right?

      • Merry says:

        If you were only talking about the business side, I would agree that studios and producers have greater use for Brad than her. Thats because of two things. First, he has a better record of behind the scenes work, thats not sexist. Shes not a good director, he is an excellent producer with both critical and box office success. The second is that he has a brighter future starring in successful movies and that part is indirectly sexist…women over age 40 havent sold blockbusters in the past but that doesnt mean you just toss her over now.

        But the social side of Hollywood, like people giving him a standing ovation just comes down to likeability. Brad was very social before they met and even afterwards, it was he that occassionally attended the weddings, the fundraisers and the parties. If you avoid your colleagues, people will eventually read that as aloofness or thinking you are better than us. Theres a balance to be struck with these things, he figured it out and she didnt. Sometimes its as simple as you didnt invest in the social circle, so they dont care about you.

      • bap says:

        @ Merry You incorrect!

      • bap says:

        Lucas76 Good Comments!

      • Luca76 says:

        Merry I totally think the likeablity thing is sexist. Its the same reason Charlie Sheen was able to get away with blatantly abusing his wives and kids for years basically up to the point he alienated every last power player. Men get away with everything in Hollywood and women get much less room to p** people off. If women display even half of the behavior a man does they are punished and pushed out or made to grovel to be welcomed back in the fold. It’s happened over and over again. Literally from the beginning of Hollywood down. Just look at Casey Affleck most likely winning best actor despite the fact that he sexually harrassed women in a professional capacity. Women are held to a different standard than men.

    • Peeking in says:

      Because of stories like Page Six’s, and now this– I’m beginning to hate Brad Pitt. I really liked the guy, now I’m repulsed. He won’t be getting a dime from me anytime soon.

  4. bap says:

    The Greatest Force in the World is “GOODNESS”. Angelina has it.

  5. Shambles says:

    I don’t think she cares about being a negotiate-at-all-costs actress to the studios. I love to look at her in films, but everyone knows that’s not where her love is. Humanitarian activism and her children are her priorities.

    Also:

    “Noticeably absent from the low-key [Cambodia premiere] affair — held in the Cambodian city of Angkor — were Hollywood A-listers, including Netflix’s chief content officer, Ted Sarandos… Netflix executive Sarah Bowen stood in for her boss, joining the evening’s hosts, Cambodia’s King Norodom Sihamoni and Queen Mother Norodom Monineath Sihanouk.”

    Much ado about nothing. The Netflix CCO had to send a surrogate to Cambodia because he probably has millions of other things to do. There’s no way that’s evidence that her relationship with Hollywood is tenuous at best.

    • OhDear says:

      Plus they gave her son an executive producer credit! The article seems to contradict itself on this point (“They HATE her so they didn’t attend, but were willing to accommodate her requests.”)

      • LadyT says:

        I didn’t follow that either. The only explanation I can come up with is the EP credit for Maddox was established in the past and Netflix chief not attending is right now.

    • lucy2 says:

      I thought that was odd too – the CCO is probably pretty busy to fly halfway around the world for 1 premiere. It’s nothing for him to go to a series event in LA, but Cambodia is more than a quick drive across town.

  6. Maya says:

    Sorry but David Koepp has already written a draft for Bride of Frankenstein and he thinks it one of his best script.

    It seems that Angelina has got a lot more projects in the pipeline that I thought.

    Good for her – she is an amazing actor and director.

  7. Bridget says:

    I think that 2 different things are going on.

    1) there is definitely bad blood over her divorce

    2) Jolie has been making really non-commercial choices, but commands a huge salary and expectation of contribution for her acting work, and those aren’t aligning well as things are currently. Jolie has proven herself a decent but not great director, and while she’s choosing stories with a lot of meaning, they’re never going to be big box office (I can’t believe Netflix paid that much for Father). I can certainly understand why acting may not hold a lot of interest or challenge to her anymore, but if she wants to keep her profile high in order to afford her the other opportunities, she’s going to have to figure out a better balance.

    ETA: not to mention, Hollywood tends to cool quickly on high maintenance stars in this vein (I’m also thinking of Edward Norton here). Casting Jolie tends to be a big production now, with the expectation that she gets to give input on the script – and that can make it difficult to make the deal (as seen with Murder On The Orient Express). It’s a turn off for some directors and producers.

    • The Original G says:

      I don’t know about 1 but I completely agree on the rest.

    • tracking says:

      Yes to all of this and, sorry, but for a woman on the wrong side of 40, it is infinitely harder. As unfair as it is, studios only care about the ROI in the end, and will work with cheaper, “hotter” talent. I hope she follows Affleck’s lead and works on directing interesting, smaller-scale fare to build her reputation as a skillful director.

      • Bridget says:

        I think that she has a presence and if she went back to just regular acting, she’d be back up at the top. She’s magnetic, regardless of age. But that would also mean stepping back from the writing, which I don’t think she wants to do.

    • friend of says:

      When the dust settles she probably won’t have much cache in Hollywood. Like most of life, lots depends on who you know. She knows people, but I don’t think she has made the connections on her own that she needs to to just greenlight a script. Plus, she doesn’t want to do the films that would bring in the big bucks. As for directing, is known for downer films that don’t get paying viewers, awards or critical acclaim. Now, without Brad, she will be on her own to navigate. She’s not an unknown and what is known, these days, doesn’t seem to be in her favor. But, she will definitely need to make big bucks. Her lifestyle costs a lot. Look at the cost of her current housing. Not cheap, or even reasonable. I’m sure Brad will pay reasonably for the children, but it won’t be enough for her to live large and carry an entourage, not in the same way she does now. The Netflix cost included 1 million just for her traveling arrangements, family and entourage. Hopefully enough people will want to watch to make back the money spent. But its not in English, so…

      • Bridget says:

        I think the biggest challenge isn’t that she CAN’T navigate Hollywood, but that she doesn’t really seem to want to. And that’s really the biggest contrast between her and Brad here – he makes movies. He obviously acts, but also produces a lot and has a good eye. He wants to be a part of the Hollywood eco-system, and that carries a lot of weight in this contrast of the 2.

      • KB says:

        Given her interest in directing and writing, I’m surprised she hasn’t just started her own production company.

      • Jag says:

        She does have her own production Company, had it before she got with Brad.

      • KB says:

        @Jag I didn’t know that, were the film’s she directed co-produced by it?

        ETA: I take it back I do remember Jolie Pas. It is listed as a production company for Unbroken and By The Sea.

      • Bridget says:

        First, we weren’t discussing her production company. But second, her shingle is more of a vanity shingle, meant for her own work. It’s not like Plan B (or Reese Witherspoon’s Type A or even Drew Barrymore’s Flower Films), which has turned into a legit production company and not just churning out vehicles for their star. And that’s no shade on the Jolie – she’s not that into the moviemaking business. I’d be shocked for a star of Jolie’s stature NOT to have a shingle to handle their movie work like that.

      • Fa says:

        The Netflix cost included 1 million just for her traveling arrangements, family and entourage.

        You believe this, trade never talked about her family travel expenses but suddenly they are talking this when she is not with Brad anymore, you people think this is not hit piece, really?

      • dotdotdot says:

        @Fa:

        Agreed! They used to travel in big company all the time — kids, entourage, etc. But it only now is somehow a total diva move? Plus, Angelina has sole custody over her kids right now! So what was she supposed to do? Can you imagine the outrage, if she would have left the children in US? The headlines questioning her parenting would have been just beyond… Woman can´t win.

    • Felicia says:

      The comments in this article echo those in the Rudin emails. Interference with the script to an extent that it becomes problematic enough that she gets dropped from the project. Doubling of the proposed budget.

  8. Sarah says:

    Another World War II spy movie? No, thanks but “Catherine the Great and Potemkin: The Imperial Love Affair” sounds very interesting.

    • Odell says:

      ITAWY, I hope she says no to the WWII one.

    • Tanguerita says:

      I am sorry, but it sounds trashy. Just in my opinion. Plus, Catherine – at least according to numerous historical records – was anything but beautiful. Charming and charismatic – maybe, but definitely not a looker. Not that Hollywood would ver let the truth get in the way of a good story

      • Arya says:

        You’re right about that HW doesn’t care about the truth or facts. I mean they also let white actresses play Cleopatra soooo.. ^^

      • Jeesie says:

        She was also a very large woman, by middle age much larger than most portraits let on.

        While I expect she’ll get the Henry VIII treatment and be portrayed as slimmer and more attractive than she ever was, even if heavily glamourised it’s not a role for a stunning waif. If it’s going to be played by an American, Allison Tolman wouldn’t be a bad choice. Obviously she’s still far, far prettier and slimmer than Catherine was, but she’s not too far off the most idealised portraits, and she’s a killer actress to boot.

      • Achoo! says:

        @Arya. Cleopatra’s heritage was mostly Macedonian Greek (white) with little Egyptian blood. The Ptolemy family went back 250years in Egypt (7 generation) and all documented ancestors were of Greek heritage (they married their sisters as was the Pharaonic custom) There are a few female ancestors not named but there is no evidence by contemporary writers that any were Egyptian or African. There is some evidence that her mother may have been half Egyptian (from Algeria). The general scholarly consensusis that she was 3/4 Macedonian Greek and 1/4 Arabic Egyptian/Algerian.

      • Felicia says:

        @ARYA Cleopatra was of Greek origin, so having someone white portray her would be kind of normal.

  9. The Original G says:

    I’m a huge fan but her performance in By the Sea was excruciatingly bad. (I’m not judging, artists need to fail as well succeed to grow.) She’s got to go some distance to getting past it. All the projects described except for a Maleficent 2 sound terrible as well.

  10. Paige says:

    Page Six and THR writers need to stop acting like Angelina will never never act again became she divorced Brad Pitt. In recent years Angelina will pick up an acting job only if it really interests her. She’ll probably work enough to finance her humanitarian work and her lifestyle, but I don’t see her jumping to take every role. Her priorities are her children and humanitarian efforts.

    • KB says:

      THR’s article lists several upcoming/potential projects. They list films she has turned down, her most likely next directorial gig, her upcoming acting projects and what she’s producing.

      • Paige says:

        It does but Angelina’s name has been attached to many film projects over the years. But how often does she take the role? Not very often. I can see her doing a few films here and there, but I just don’t see her making two to three films a year like she used to. Her time is consumed with her children and charity work. To be honest, Brad and Angelina need to cut back on their work and focus on their family. Producing, directing, acting, whatever.

  11. Onika says:

    Ouch! Ouch! Can someone call 911 for me? My eyes just rolled so hard I think I’ve strained them 😛

  12. Jeesie says:

    God, we’ve been hearing about this Catherine the Great biopic she wants to star in for almost 15 years now.

    I think it probably does say something that so many of her projects seem to end up in development purgatory or just get dropped entirely. The reason is almost always that she didn’t like the script, or director or so on, and there’s nothing wrong with being picky, but it’s telling that it’s always the studio who stops trying to make it work, not her. She still wants to make Catherine and Cleo and so on and the studios just like ‘nah, let’s just drop it for now’. She was open to Wanted and Salt sequels, but after the first pitch was rejected it was the studios who decided not to come up with a new script. Usually it’s the actors who walk away first.

    I think she probably does overestimate how much power and capital she really has. Rudin was rude about her in the Sony emails, sure, but they also revealed she was acting like a producer on a project she was only meant to act in, trying to poach Fincher from other projects when the actual producers didn’t want him. That kind of thing will burn bridges in any industry, but especially in Hollywood, so I have no trouble believing she’s not a person people are dying to work with. And yeah, getting your 15yr old kid an executive producer credit on your movie doesn’t look great, nor does staging a 1 million dollar premiere in one of the worlds poorest countries.

    • Maya says:

      Denzel Washington, Clint Eastwood, David Fincher and pretty much everyone else she has worked with all said they would love to work with her again.

      She gets the best people to work with her on her projects and yet she is not liked by Hollywood????

      As for Rudin – he is the most hated man in Hollywood and he was forced to go into hiding after those leaked emails. Not Angelina but Rudin.

      • Lilly says:

        Scott Rudin definitely didn’t go into hiding over Angelina. He’s an incredibly successful producer whose films are almost always nominated for Oscar plus he’s got loads of projects lined up. ‘The most hated man in Hollywood’? Maybe you hate him, but Hollywood loves success and money and he brings both.

        Denzel hasn’t worked with her in almost two decades, Clint Eastwood would probably love to work with Donald Trump, and David Fincher is working on the World War Z sequel with Brad.

        I think she should just do the Disney movie and then line up some interesting directing gigs with smaller budgets. She really hasn’t proven herself yet, and it takes time to learn anything well.

      • Jeesie says:

        They said they’d love to work with her again (which is really just a standard response), but they haven’t exactly sought her out. Eastwood didn’t come back to her with a bunch of possible projects, Fincher hasn’t tailored any roles for her…she’s never had that kind of relationship with any director or producer.

        And Rudin certainly hasn’t gone into hiding, he’s still very visible if you know where to look. He’s never been Harvey Weinstein, acting like a big celebrity on the red carpet. He’s got Fences in contention this year and 3 extremely promising films coming soon.

      • Maya says:

        What has David Fincher making a movie with Brad to do with Angelina?

        He can make movies with both.. last I heard is that WWZ sequel has been scrapped as well.

        Denzel Washington still said it so you can keep ignoring it as much as you want.

        Lastly – you seem to forget that Rudin was forced to be quiet and not do any promotion for his award nominated movie when the email scandal came out. He was told to lay down and do nothing do attract attention.

        Rudin is an ahole and there are numerous stories about how lots of people hate him in Hollywood and is only tolerated because he brings in the awards.

      • L says:

        Very true Mya.

      • Joannie says:

        Maya people only care about the bottom line! Rudin may be a jerk but he brings in the money. He isnt one to get in a dog fight with.

      • lucy2 says:

        “he is the most hated man in Hollywood and he was forced to go into hiding after those leaked emails.”
        Whaaaat? I’ve seen this said here before, and it’s simply not true. He’s a jerk, everyone knows it, but he produces great movies. A LOT of them. People are willing to overlook his attitude because he gets huge results. He has never been “forced into hiding”.
        I’ve never heard a director or costar say anything bad about working with her, so yes, they’d probably all be happy to work with her again.
        If she is overstepping her role when hired as an actress, I can see producers and studios not being too eager, but that’s why she should just keep doing her own projects.

      • Jeesie says:

        Told to be quiet by whom exactly? He’s the head of his own production company.

        And anyway, he campaigned as normal for the 2015 Oscars. If anything he was so passionate about Grand Budapest Hotel he was a little more public about it than usual. He’s a producer, he doesn’t go around doing junkets and giving dozens of interviews when he has a film out. He works behind the scenes.

        Yeah, lots of people hate him. That goes for most of the big Hollywood producers. They’re all gigantic jerks.

        The Sony emails didn’t reveal anything about him everyone in the industry didn’t already know, in fact they actually showed he really is much mellower these days. If he’d been hacked a decade ago those emails would have been so much more interesting.

    • Bridget says:

      There is a lot that I really like about the Jolie, but I think part of the problem is that she doesn’t have great taste, and that’s part of the problem. I’ve always thought that her stardom is because her presence is able to transcend the material she chooses – there’s really only been a handful of movies she’s done that I actually enjoyed and would watch again. And as a writer/director, she is kind of able to skip steps because she’s a superstar, and it’s not doing her work any favors. I would love to see her in something funny and sexy again, because she would knock it out of the park.

      • bap says:

        Dame Angelina has her own production company.

      • Embee says:

        I agree with you. Her writing (in particular), and her directing suffer from her lack of training. I don’t believe that every person needs to obtain a traditional University education to write or direct, but there’s something to be said for four years of writing, writing, writing and having your writing pulled apart, assessed and critiqued. At her stage in life it would be rare to find the time or have the desire to put herself through that process.

        Her taste (to use your word) similarly suffers from lack of exposure, in my opinion.

      • pwal says:

        I agree with you, Bridget. Her charisma can only take her so far.

        Plus the appearance of her ‘cutting in line’ in terms of directing, despite the majority of her films tanked critically and financially, is not sustainable. Yeah, Brad was right there beside her during these projects, but he chipped in financially and publicity-wise as well. But with his projects, he made it more about shining light on his costars, director, writers, etc. Plus, he is willing to discuss/acknowledge when his films came up short, box-office wise and creatively, without necessarily throwing anyone under the bus. This is not to say that Angelina has thrown anyone associated with her films under the bus, but then again, her filmography is never the focus of her interviews.

        Which brings me to the next thing… it is one thing to talk about and wear helmets, jewelry, etc. designed by your children, but giving your kid an executive producer credit… come on! I’m sure that some Angelina fans found that perfectly acceptable/adorable, but I am pretty sure that many in HW wouldn’t care for that, since production credits, especially for critically acclaimed films, usually devolve into battle royales, even under the best of circumstances. Plus, it illustrates that Angelina continues to not listen/remember/process anything that comes out of her mouth. She doesn’t want the kids in the business and yet, Pax took photo stills for the film, Shiloh drew pictures used in the film, Maddox got a promotion from PA to executive producer and all of the children are making high-profile appearances on behalf of her film. Yes, the public is curious about this family, but it’s really feeling like she’s using the kids to couch any potential criticism/bad reviews that could be leveled against this movie. If this film falls short, in terms of acclaim and financial receipts, it’s not the kids’ burden to carry.

    • tracking says:

      I think this is where the Brad split hurts her. She is certainly a huge name in her own right, but she hasn’t really been profitable (except for a niche role like Maleficent) for quite a while. Some of her ability to make these kinds of demands (recently anyway) stem from the expectations tied to the cachet she and Pitt had as a couple. I hope she can set aside the “diva stuff” and work on high-quality projects that will bolster her reputation. As Allied showed, even Pitt can’t carry a movie any more, but he still has producing/great supporting character opportunities and lots of clout in the industry. Now that the Brangelina heyday is over, she’ll have to make smart, strategic choices moving forward, and counter the perception that she can’t earn awards as a director or that her acting work is no longer strong a la The Tourist and By the Sea.

      • Zazz says:

        The irony about this whole Pitt vs Jolie stardom is that Jolie is still the biggest awards owner from the two (both Oscars and others) and also the one with the biggest commercial hit (Maleficent) from the two.

        Both haven’t made many blockbusters since they are together but Jolie ones seem to turn into bigger financial returns than Pitt’s.

        So i don’t understand this whole Pitt narrative of being the solely having Hollywood and being the bigger star from the two.

        From where i stand, outside the US, Jolie is the bigger one of the two. Maybe the fact that she is basicly the most famous female face from Hollywood plays in it. There is Jolie, then the others.

        Whereas, for Pitt, there are a bunch of better and more wordly embraced actors like Cruise, Depp, RDJ, ect… He has a bunch of competition at the top. He is clearly among the last ones from the top game.

        Jolie hasen’t but she needs to get more into the business and balance her projects better with more blockbusters in them, in my view.

      • V4Real says:

        The thing about Maleficent is that you could have put Charlize Theron or Kate Blanchant in that role and it still would have done great. It’s a Disney film about a fairytale.

      • KB says:

        @Zazz Don’t they each have one Oscar? Or are you referring to just acting? Brad’s was for producing 12YAS.

      • Zazz says:

        @V4Real

        Nope. Maleficent was one of the few rotten Disney movie and its success is due to Jolie returning to acting after a few years.

        I rememberred even people at Disney said it. It also made much, much more in a lot of foreign markets where those kind of movies don’t usually do as well on Jolie’s name…Japan is one of them where it reaches number 2 grosses of the year but also Italy and in a lot of south american markets where it reaches top 3 of the year because of Jolie’s name attached to it.

        Without Jolie, it would have never reached those levels.

        @KB

        Yeah, i am talking about acting where Jolie has one win and three nominations. But also about Golden Globes where she has three or four nominations and one win if memory serves me well.

      • Bridget says:

        I think that’s under-valuing Jolie’s work in selling Malificent. She got out and hustled hard, and I’d say that she was the draw that made that movie a success. I genuinely don’t think Charlize Theron would have sold it the same way – just look at Winter’s War.

      • dotdotdot says:

        V4Real says:
        “The thing about Maleficent is that you could have put Charlize Theron or Kate Blanchant in that role and it still would have done great. It’s a Disney film about a fairytale.”

        Haha, yes, if you would have attached another well known actress who is also great at acting, the movie probably still would have done great. Like, Blanchet and Theron are A-Listers who are super great at their craft?

  13. Jayna says:

    No one ever thought she was done. Their lifestyle costs are massive traveling from place to place, teachers, nannies, cooks, maids, security guards, housing for help, salaries, airfare for them. What she makes writing and directing is extremely time-consuming as far as getting financing, pre-production, writing, directing, post-production, etc., and she doesn’t make a fortune from it. And now she isn’t getting Brad’s income anymore, nor is she asking for any support for the future. And you don’t get movies made (directing gigs, movies written by her produced) without maintaining connections to Hollywood as far as studios, etc.

    Her high-salary gigs in acting in something like Maleficent and commercials/ads overseas, etc., are what bring in the dollars so she can do what she is passionate about, her humanitarian work and writing and directing.

    • Jag says:

      Where did you get that from, 12 years together, 6 children, do the math and the youngest kids are eight.
      Life style they’re accustomed to.

      • Jayna says:

        In the divorce announcement in the beginning, she stated wasn’t asking for money, I thought. I didn’t mean she wouldn’t legally be entitled to money from him.

    • Dana says:

      @Jayna You’re right. In the divorce documents she didn’t ask his money.

  14. Mannori says:

    ted sarandos is team brad…for a number of reasons, not only business

  15. Guesto says:

    Gawd, even reading about those potential projects makes me weary. Why does she always have to be so ‘worthy’? I have a lot of respect for Angie but her acting career is very hit and miss and her directing even more so. I really wish she’d call it a day, acting and directing-wise, and just focus on what she does best and what she seems to take most pleasure from, her humanitarian work.

    But if she is going to continue her industry career, I do wish she’d lighten up a bit and do a rom com or something.

    Jennifer Aniston could be in it! 😉

    • dotdotdot says:

      Nobody really does romcoms anymore, they are a niche market now.

    • kay says:

      i would give almost ANYTHING to see those two in a romcom together.
      seriously.
      i think it would be awesome.

      • Felicia says:

        I’d like to see them in a remake of “Death Becomes Her” with Pitt as the character that Bruce Willis played. Lolol

  16. Pix says:

    If she spends the rest of her days in Hollywood as a producer, I think that would be fine. Her interest in “The One and Only Ivan” is a sure bet – kids love that book and it has a message that fits into what i perceive as her world view. Brad is a successful producer, I think that might be a good fit for Angelina too. Unfortunately, people aren’t paying to see her act in movies and this divorce mess is not going to attract more people to her fan base.

  17. bap says:

    Here is a great article below regarding How Angelina views Hollywood.

    http://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/1132185/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-hollywood

    • Guesto says:

      It’s not a great article. It’s, with any of these random think-pieces, a mix of the author’s own opinion and carefully selected facts to solidify that opinion, while ignoring the very many other facts that might not sit so well with that opinion.

      I like and admire AJ for her humanitarian work but this need, by her fans, to present her at all times as ‘above’ and ego-free is just, at best, silly, and at worst, seriously tiresome.

      Why not just see and admire her for the very knowing and strategic and image conscious player she is?

      • Paige says:

        This article is a shot at the Page Six article. She makes a few good points. Page Six writers wrote a hit piece and want their readers to believe everything she’s accomplished is because of her relationship with Brad their children. It was sexiest and nasty.

        Plus, when is it a good thing to have the love of your peers but not the love of your children. They act like it was some sort of accomplishment. Was is suppose to make Brad look good and Angelina bad? I’m confused.

        It’s been said here many times. Angelina is PR savvy but she has never been all Hollywood like her soon to be ex husband. She has slowly moved away from making major film projects to directing small historical films. She will act because it brings in money. However being an actress, producer, or director will never come before being a humanitarian which is another point the author made.

  18. MunichGirl says:

    I hope FTKMF will be successful but people are so lazy nowadays that they probably won’t watch it because it’s not in English and they would have to read subtitles.

  19. Alexandria says:

    She is an awesome action film actress. I hope to see her in another action role before she gets tired of acting or stunts or goes into directing full time. I find that in her serious roles, I see Angelina the magnetic film star, not the character.

    • Grant says:

      This. But I don’t have a lot of optimism regarding her returning to her action film roots after she shot down Wanted 2 and Salt 2, two of her very best movies (and performances) IMO.

  20. molly says:

    I think angie’s film career is hit & miss because of her lack of passion for it, especially acting. When she first started out she was so passionate & would fully go into a role. When she became a mother & activist her interest waned. As much as i love seeing her films. Think if your heart is not in it? Then walk away & do what interests you most. Also think angie has an issue with control? in that she fully wants to take charge of her life & career. That is in no way a bad thing. Hollywood doesn’t like strong, direct, take charge women. Think what’s best for angie is to step away for a while. Let all the gossip die down & focus on herself. Her health, her family & what she really wants to do in life. Always felt she was more content when she came away from the industry. Whatever she does? I wish her the best. She is a strong character that deals with all the vileness thrown at her. Huge respect for that.

    • YepIsaidit says:

      I always hoped that after she got away from pitt she would revitalize her career. Hope it happens like Kidman did after cruise.

      Angelina turned down a lot of good movie roles because Brad wanted to work

      • bap says:

        @YepIsaidit

        Please tell what you think about the below article about Angelina.

        http://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/1132185/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-hollywood

      • Jeesie says:

        Did she? She made 15 films while they were together, he made 19. 5 of his were voice work or glorified cameos, 3 of hers were voice work. Not a crazy disparity there.

        He has his producing work, she has her UN work, and writing and directing features is more time intensive than simply acting in them, so honestly it seems to me they worked pretty equally.

      • YepIsaidit says:

        Yes she did Jessie. She would turn down good roles for crap because the good roles were being filmed when Pitt needed to work. As she once said she put herself last because she loved Brad . When did he ever put Angie or his kids first? NEVER !!

        His producing work is mostly him taking credit for Dede and Jeremy producing skills and movie choices.

      • YepIsaidit says:

        Thanks for sharing bap. I’ll check it out right now.

  21. YepIsaidit says:

    She’s an actress and has six kids and humanitarian work to provide for.

    Two things I knew would happen once she got away from pitt

    1 she would start appearing healthier -gaining weight

    2 she would work more

    But she really doesn’t need Hollywood to work in Hollywood. Thr article was a semi hit piece that reads like a tabloid that Pitts team hired. 😂

    THEY sound pressed and jealous that Angelina didn’t need Hollywood in Cambodia and her two British friends (who some say Brad hates) are dragged. + the non existent smear campaign g was brought up- gaslight because if anyone has a smear campaign it’s brads doing against Angelina.
    It’s like telling women in hollywood — don’t you ever leave your “isolated incident” abusive husband—- EVER!!

    Whatever – angelina stays winning!!!

  22. bap says:

    Angelina has her own production company it call PAS

  23. Nan says:

    As weird as this may be, I really don’t enjoy the sound of Angelina’s voice and the way she talks, which is why I don’t care for her as an actress. Her humanitarian work is, of course, really admirable.

  24. Sera says:

    I love everything about Angelina and can’t wait to see her in ano y her movie. As for Brad I felt Angelina was too much for him from the beginning. She really helped him in his career encouraging his producing and various projects. She was a supportive partner. So m etching happened in their relationship. Either because of her operations or his desire to be away from family so much last year. Whatever I am sad for them both.

  25. Silly minx says:

    I think she should work with an unexpected director or do a role where she can be drastically different like playing someone who is really vulnerable. Or find a vehicle such as Keanu has with John Wick. Maybe she needs her own Kill Bill or Taken. If she can get asses in seats, then Hollywood will give her anything she wants.

  26. Turtle says:

    You have to be extra careful about anything from The Hollywood Reporter or, to a lesser extent, Deadline.com (same parent company). They’re all about clickbait and happy to run a hit piece if it will garner pageviews.

    • GeenaH says:

      To be honest it’s about the narrative. If Page Six(a clickbait website) says something that can get the #TeamAngie or TeamBrad side riled up then that’s what is wrote about.
      Just like the Star or Hollywood reporter are believed if it is someone who is hated, and is called trash when it’s about someone well liked. When it’s always trash and fodder.

    • Ana says:

      Really? The Hollywood Reporter is one of the most trusted media about what goes on in the industry. They are the opposite of clickbait (and so is Deadline). Not to mention they aren’t from the same “parent company”, Perhaps you’re confusing it with Variety, which is owned by the same company as Deadline.

      • YepIsaidit says:

        So trusted that they don’t even know about her deal with GUERLAIN and use tabloids as sources. Mmk.lol this was obviously a hit piece from Team Pitt because they are pissed at Angelina promo tour in Cambodia. He couldn’t stop her from taking the kids and she did not deny the incident and even doubled down by saying they are STILL trying to heal.
        Her publicity tour made her seem more real, authentic and LOVED by not only the public (online and in Cambodia) but more importantly by her children. It was a really good strategy on her part— all without the help of Hollywood publicists BTw.

        THR most likely could not get a source close to Angelina to talk to them so they got Pitts sources to bash her. He’s an ass!! he’s pissed and throwing s temper tantrum !!!!

      • Ana says:

        @YepIsaidit I’m not sure why Guerlain or tabloids have anything to do with this particular article, that talks about the projects Angelina Jolie is considering. I see it actually as an article that helps her, because it suggests she’s still very much active in Hollywood and being contacted for a lot of things. The barely mention Brad Pitt. Did you even read the article? THR is an industry magazine, their pieces are about industry mostly and their sources come from studios and producing companies.

        Nowhere the piece bashes her. And their sources clearly come from Angelina’s team, if you know how to read between the lines.

      • Fa says:

        THR is like People Magazine in the world of trades the other are more respectable

      • YepIsaidit says:

        If you don’t know what Guerlain has to do with the article than you obviously didn’t read the article. They flat out say she’s not endorsing anything right now. As for tabloids- they say geyer left because of a movie deal which is not true and def from a tabloid. He didn’t like Brad or his Pr team. End of.

      • Turtle says:

        My mistake. I was thinking about Deadline and Variety. But criticism of the Hollywood Reporter stands.

  27. Ana says:

    I find it interesting that the article basically says that Angelina was fired from Murder on the Orient Express, supposedly her big comeback, for wanting to change so much about the script. If it’s true then it says a lot about how far Angelina has fallen in her star status in Hollywood. I wonder how that reunion with Johnny Depp would have been, didn’t they allegedly hate each other in The Tourist? I can’t imagine her putting up with him the way he is now, especially after the Brad Pitt fiasco.

  28. Ramy says:

    As someone earlier said to the rest of the world
    There is Jolie, then the others. No one but angie can get the whole world talking about her when she’s opening a small movie in Cambodia. I mean go look in twitter for example her photos and videos are all over the place young ppl are supporting her and admire what she’s doing . Liked or hate her angelina jolie’s name is more than enough

    • Fa says:

      True, she is on the news and every media want to write something about her and ironically she only invited BBC over there to report about the movie. Look now every single media is interested reporting her trip over there, amazing.

    • YepIsaidit says:

      Exactly. When Brad had his first outing since the divorce I was shocked at how little people cared. It wasn’t as big of a deal as Angelina in Cambodia with the kang and queen 🤔😋

      It just wasn’t – it’s a fact!!!

    • Cara says:

      Seriously, that bug eating video? It’s done gone viral and got people talking about it on the streets!! Jolie FTW, lol

    • bap says:

      @Ramey You are correct! No one but Angelina get the world talking

  29. Fa says:

    The article is hit piece and most of it are not true, they are talking one premiere but there are 3 premieres in 3 different different cities. They don’t know what going on over there.

    • Lauren II says:

      I have never liked Angelina as an actress, but i admire her humanitarian work and endless motherly devotion to her family.
      Angie’s preventative Cancer operations probably caused a great deal of physical and emotional trauma. I feel this is the time when Angie and Brad’s tensions were magnified. Angie was a red hot bombshell for a decade with Brad, then she had her operations, became more subdued, and the fantasy life Brad envisioned had evaporated.
      Angie is a strong woman and devoted mother. I am tired of all the disparaging comments about Angie-she is the only one holding the Jolie-Pitt family together.

  30. Nile says:

    Lauren II, aint that truth. We all know she loves this man with all her heart, but something happened and she had to choose a side and she chose her kids…basically her family. I think they never thought they’d have to choose but life happens and she had to pull the trigger. So when she says “for the health of the family” she means the after month of some tough decisions she had to make” that’s why we’ve seen her so emotional talking about it but composed and strong because she knows why she did what she had to do, however painful it is for all. So basically whatever transpires at the end, everyone will be fine

  31. Cara says:

    Looks like there are a few folks calling out page six hit pieces as B.S . Rightly so I may say. Jolie will be fine after the dust is settled. As for Pitt, someone needs to keep an eye on him for potential OD’s. Dude may mix it up too much with alcohol and you know what.

    http://nymag.com/thecut/2017/02/angelina-jolie-doesnt-need-a-publicist.html

  32. norah says:

    the fact that brad was given a standing ovation at the golden globes says a lot. they have chosen sides – yeah because his company is doing well and that he is well liked and respected but because he makes money and has fab pr. probably there will be enough stories of how people tolerated her for his sake etc – and making brad to be the nice guy here. that is typical hollywood. I just wish that she wd just leave the states and move abroad and get rid of the stink of hollywood but that is not her style. she is strong enough to put up with bs so i say good for her. the fact that netflix asked her to do this film and basically ignored her has not been forgotten either. she deserves better

    • Cara says:

      @norah, of course they had chosen to side with Pitt. No surprise there knowing they, HW industry, had been willing to work with the likes of Polanskis and Gibsons who had far more worse reputations and charged allegations than Pitt’s. After all Pitt had spent more than 20 years to cultivate his perfect image of a good chap who is friendly to everyone in the industry and who since in being with Jolie had helped greenlighting a bunch of movies that would not be made without his production company plan B. Dude is very much aware of making sure his reputation is not to be tarnished at all cost and thus the request of sealing for all divorce proceedings. Sure it’s been sold by him and his people as a protection for the kids but also to his benefits.

      @bap, Allied was produced by GK films and two other companies ? Not plan B.

  33. bap says:

    Question did not Pitt produced Allied and it failed at the box office?

  34. Heather says:

    She still has alot to learn as a writer and director. It’s great that she wants to take on these laborious tasks to create work that reflects her values and experience, experiences that are largely lacking from mainstream hollywood films (travel to non-touristic destinations and the effects of war and politically failed states on its citizens, I mean).

    However, she makes tons of money working as an actress and if she’s hired as an actress, she should not meddle so much in the script and directing of those commercial films.

  35. bap says:

    Angelina is a Good writer and Great Director especially with action scenes.