Taylor Swift teases her futuristic video for ‘Ready For It’: Britney Realness?

Taylor Swift's new video 'Look What You Made Me Do'

Taylor Swift has released three songs from her soon-to-be-released album, and I only like one of them thus far. “Gorgeous” is juvenile garbage and “Look What You Made Me Do” is a bad song with a dumb, incoherent message (and an even stupider video). But I’m really into “Ready For It” – I downloaded it right away and it’s been one of my workout jams for weeks now. It’s a really solid workout song. Unfortunately, Taylor Swift won’t let us have nice things. We can’t just enjoy one of her songs independent of The Snake Emoji Artist. So Taylor has been teasing the music video for “Ready For It” and this looks like… a rejected Britney Spears video concept?

…Ready For It? Official Music Video out Thursday night. #ReadyForItMusicVideo

A post shared by Taylor Swift (@taylorswift) on

The full music video comes out Thursday night, so prepare yourselves for what will probably be… Taylor Swift in a nude catsuit/bodysuit, strutting around a futuristic industrial site and possibly getting electrocuted…? ARE YOU READY FOR IT? Apparently, fans are comparing the design for this video to Ghost in the Shell (doubtful) and Blade Runner (I could see that). There are also a lot of people clutching their pearls about Tay-Tay showing off her skin. Personally, I don’t find nude body stockings all that shocking, but it will be interesting to analyze Taylor’s ever-evolving breast implant situation.

Taylor Swift's new video 'Look What You Made Me Do'

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

101 Responses to “Taylor Swift teases her futuristic video for ‘Ready For It’: Britney Realness?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nicole says:

    *sigh* when Britney evolved she really evolved. This is just going from PG to PG-13

  2. Julianna says:

    It looks so early 2000’s. Like a super lame Britney rip-off paired with a little Avril Lavigne emo/faux punk. Not good.

  3. Anna nuttall says:

    This song is so bad. I really wish she go back to her Red era or at least a little country. Not feeling this era right now.

    • Llamas says:

      Agreed. It has 2 completely unrelated melodies and she sounds strained.

      I think this album sounds awful so far. Granted only three songs have been released but I’ve thought all of them were horrible.

      • Julianna says:

        I really wonder how she’s going to sing these songs live? They’re not traditionally difficult, but they all still have a lot more key changes than she’s used to, and that’s something she always struggles with. There’s a reason so many of her songs have a static sound that doesn’t build or switch gears.

        She’s not a great performer (she can’t dance and she isn’t exactly a magnetic stage presence), so singing live for at least most of the show is kind of necessary to create energy. If she can’t do that she’s going to have to put on a really gimmicky show loaded with distractions.

      • Cranberry says:

        @Julianna, I agree with you assessment of her stage capabilities. Britney wasn’t a strong singer and also copied Madona’s performance style, but at least she and Madona could pull off a big show with their own dancing abilities and/or stage presence.
        Taylor’s stage performances are just missing something. It doesn’t matter she’s not a dancer although maybe it would help. She just doesn’t convey any since of authenticity, soul or just plain stage presence. Maybe it doesn’t matter if viewing her show from far away, but when you see her perform close up, it’s just not there. She goes through the staging and costuming and hits her marks, but you really can’t get any sense of drive or heart from her performance.

    • Bros says:

      UGh she is so very extra, in her mind. Im beyond sick of her face.

    • Mandymc says:

      The Red era was my favorite. I need the old Taylor back

    • Miss V says:

      I still don’t understand how she’s the biggest pop star in the world. She isn’t over-the-top talented. 1989 was her best album, and it was mostly good songs. But she cannot sing very well. She’s worse at dancing. When you watch her perform, she just looks awkward. And she has almost no sex appeal. She a pretty girl, but not sexy. At all. I just don’t get it. Apparently I never will.

      • Ozogirl says:

        I agree, she’s a decent songwriter, but a bad live performer and even worse singer.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        A person has never needed all of those things to be the biggest pop star in the world. You just need hype and to connect to your target demographic. Marketing matters more than talent, but that has been true for decades.

      • jammypants says:

        I think the term “pop star” is very different now. It’s more cult of personality than any semblance of talent now.

        I think if she quits being a popstar, her career can have a second life as a songwriter.

  4. Louise177 says:

    Geez are there going to a billion Taylor Swift stories covered everyday for the next year? What makes it more annoying is that it’s the same stories for years but different people inserted – “blind” item songs, new boyfriend, feuds.

  5. danny85 says:

    the video for lwymmd was great, even if you don’t like the song you have to admit the video was great. all of the tiny details that tied into the lyrics, the “clues” that popped up along the way. plus nobody is making videos as well produced as she is. nobody. she’s dropping bank on them and it shows.

    • Julianna says:

      I didn’t think the video was great. Expensive looking sure, but I’m getting pretty sick of music videos that don’t have any kind of cohesive imagery or story. LWYMMD just seemed messy to me. Too many different sets and costume changes that had nothing to do with each other, a crap dance routine for no reason…it would have been much better to me if it had gone from say, Zombie Taylor, to all the Taylor’s, to the ‘new’ Taylor on the snake throne. That ties in together and makes a proper video, not just a bunch of cool looking scenes.

    • HH says:

      Nobody is making videos as well produced as Taylor?! Beyoncé’s last two releases were well produced VISUAL ALBUMS. Lemonade was PHENOMENAL. Jay-Z followed that lead with 4:44. On top of that, many of these videos made cultural statements.

      Taylor’s video looks to be a standard music video, however that could be due to my age. I grew up in the era of TRL, so that was quintessential time for music videos. I haven’t been wowed by music videos as an adult outside of Beyoncé, Jay-Z and Rihanna on a few occasions.

    • jammypants says:

      Her videos this album cycle kind of take me back to MTV TRL times. Anyone remember those making of the video programs? But I think they remind me of those because Joseph Kahn directed a lot of them back then.

    • Masina says:

      The video may have been entertaining for most, but I couldn’t get past the bathtub scene in the beginning. It was an obvious mockery of Kim K’s trauma – complete with making finger guns. I get that Taylor is petty, but making fun of an event in which a mother of 2 was held at gun point is not just petty, it’s basically evil. I don’t care how many flowers she sends people, that was the thing that solidified my revulsion toward her.

      • K-Peace says:

        I agree completely. Like you said, the bathtub scene was mockery of Kim K’s robbery. I agree, she’s downright evil. Can’t stand her & her petty juvenile bullsh*t.

    • Cranberry says:

      “nobody is making videos as well produced as she is. nobody”

      You’re not serious are you? That video is straight up MTV/TRL circa 1990-2000+. So what if you can see all the little dropped in references to blah and blah. Nothing new here. Same standard, glitzy, flash editing, MTV crap.
      Just cause she spent a bunch of $ to make some shiny, eye candy doesn’t mean it’s a feat of video producing.

  6. Lindy79 says:

    That…doesn’t look like her body. Jussayin

    • Josie says:

      We’ve seen lots of swim photos over the years and the legs/hips/torso in this video don’t really match up to Taylor’s past appearances. Bodies change and I feel a little skeevy looking that closely, but my first instinct is that she totally used a body double. Her prerogative tbh.

      • Moira says:

        I don’t know, she’s recently told a fan she’s put on 12lbs and from the LWYMMD the dom outfit you can see her body has changed and I could see this being her

      • Josie says:

        Different poster here btw – she put weight on last year, it was obvious in all those pap pics in June/July last year (probably to distract from the new implants).

    • jammypants says:

      I think it’s normal to be in curvier after mid 20s. Just look at Rihanna. She was so thin for ages but now has more defined curves. I think Katy Perry gained some lbs too before she dropped it all when she started promoting her new album.

      • Handwoven says:

        Yeah but you don’t go from straight up and down to hourglass.

      • jammypants says:

        I don’t think Taylor looks like an hourglass even now. Just fuller looking. I do agree with others that she’s had implants, which the extra weight hides a little better.

  7. grabbyhands says:

    I don’t know why we have to have trailers for upcoming videos. That is annoying to me.

    Anyway, Michael K had the best commentary on it, as ever (so glad he is back!) –

    I see that one person in America actually watched Ghost in the Shell. And it looks like Taylor Swift found a way to further whitewash the already whitewashed-to-sh*t Ghost in the Shell movie. That’s a f*cking feat!

  8. Truthie says:

    It’s Joseph Kahn. He makes videos for both Britney and Taylor.

  9. Jessi says:

    Can we criticize women without talking about their bodies, please?

    • Josie says:

      By all means, but IMO it gets me when someone in the public eye – esp a role model to impressionable preteen and teen girls – gets obvious plastic surgery and denies it.

      Also wearing a nude body suit in a video is going to attract comments, also esp for media savvy/manipulative (depending on your viewpoint) who has up until this point had such a clean image that she didn’t believe in exposing her naval.

  10. Nancy says:

    She is one of the few performers I can think of who is trying to evolve and going sideways. I never believed her goody two shoes persona, but a badass she is not. I don’t watch or listen to her, but feel I know her from all the threads on this site. Chick needs to smile, the stink face is like ugly crying on steroids. Hit Me Baby One More Time, yeah she’s not Brit.

    • Artemis says:

      It’s weird because she has the talent to write a catchy song with basic ass lyrics but the more pop she goes, the more generic, subpar and faux-sexualized she gets without any real message. She’s just not an interesting person and it doesn’t help she has upbeat songs without the ability to give good choreo or vocals during live performances. The only interesting side she has is her business acumen which she doesn’t really own up to. I would buy a business book written by her tbh.

      This era is her focus on giving high budget videos with dubious story lines for crap songs (with crap beats and crap lyrics). Interesting turn of events.
      If she wants critical success, she should stick with her popsound of 1989 or the sound she had for Red (sorry I didn’t listen to that album but it’s considered her best sooo).

      • Madly says:

        You mean her parents’ business savy. This kid does not make those decisions, she is just the face of the brand.

      • Cranberry says:

        Agree with Madly. Her parents negotiated a good contract for her and put in place her team of business execs, lawyers and PR professionals, etc. I’m sure she’s learned a great deal of business savvy too, but it was her parents that come from the banking and pr industry that made business decisions for their underage daughter, set her company up and probably hold majority share in it with her.

  11. Bishg says:

    And they say 80s music was shallow…
    The 80s gave us wonderful anthems with deep, inspired lyrics tackling all kind of themes AND catchy, irresistible tunes!
    This music is mind-numbing, I wouldn’t even call it “music”, but irritating white noise.. is she capable to write about ANYTHING than her silly teenager love life ?
    Katy Perry did it better once and for all with Teenage dream, anyway.

  12. Jaii says:

    I like the fact she’s owning her own body , showing it by her own choice rather than the sh1t show of a video Kanye used her body for . And like a poster above said no one is putting out videos like this anymore so I’m here for it even if RFI isn’t my fav song.

    • Amy Tennant says:

      I totally think this is a deliberate reaction to the Kanye video, and as such, I dig it!

      • Erica_V says:

        Yep it feels that way to me too – a reowning of her body after he exposed it without her consent.

  13. Millenial says:

    What happened to releasing one single at a time? Is she promoting Gorgeous or Ready for It? I feel like these songs would be a bit more successful if she focused on one at a time and, you know, actually promoted them.

  14. Millie says:

    We are n thebd middle of the harassment scandal and we are surrounded young women showing off their bodies and dancing sexually explicit ways to sell videos? Interesting comparison of values.

    • Anatha A says:

      Not a Taylor fan, but your comparison is crap.

      If Taylor wants to show her body (or a body suit) and use sexually explicit imaginaries to sell her product, she is free to do so.

      Stop with the victim blaming. Women should be free to do whatever they want with their own bodies. It’s when others try to censor it or demand control over the bodies of women that we run into trouble.

      Now the obvious use of a whitewashed narrative for her video, while not denouncing rampant racism among her consumers and profitting from Nazis, that’s another issue….

      • Millie says:

        Not victim blaming at all, but are male performers expected to do the same thing to sell their music? It is the opposite if victim blaming actually.

      • Anatha A says:

        The moment you compare a young woman showing of her body and ask what part it plays in sexual harrassment you are putting the pressure to not be sexually harrassed on young woman, which is victim blaming.

        Taylor, who is self-made and profits from selling a very innocent image to a young fanbase? If anyone is free in her choice it is her.

        She profits like no other woman in the industry and is very much in control of her own image, where usually managers and record companies force an image and gain the profits.

        If you want to talk about the sexism in general, where young beautiful woman are judged by their appearance, then you are invited to do so. Putting it in the same sentence as sexual harrassment is not the right way to do it.

    • Moira says:

      But showing their bodies by their own choice rather than a gross man demanding or coercing them too… isn’t that the biggest and most important difference? Again it shouldn’t matter how a woman acts, that gives no man any right to touch her.

    • Cheyanna says:

      Millie,No. Just no.
      Also this has been going on For years women always dance in videos, sometimes fully clothed sometimes not. Ppl release videos everyday before and after Harvey. I wish ppl would stop connecting woman to this jackass.

    • Artemis says:

      Oh please. Everybody sexualizes and takes the power and autonomy out of the female body to sell concepts, ideas and goods but as soon as a woman uses her own body to convey a message or to just own her sexuality, it’s all hands on deck. Men can make money off the female body and discard them but women can’t make a buck? Sure, it’s not really pushing feminism forward at the same time but a woman should be able to do what she wants with her body.

    • purple prankster says:

      a man going topless is not censored
      a man going naked to sell a video or product would be seen as funny or a parody or a bit yuck not s*xy or cheap
      women may find it s*xy but I guess its mens opinions that shape the narrative in this area. hence men showing skin to sell products is dismissed even when it happens

  15. Ellie says:

    I agree she can be annoying and I’m not one of those people that gets up in arms when we dare to call celebrities out instead of calling them, like, “thin-pinned maven songstress who is one of the most talented acts in the world” etc, but this all seems a little unnecessarily harsh. Vulture is doing it too, but with like six articles per video or song clip. These first three might not be masterpieces, but they’re fun, and her videos are usually fun to look at too. So much else in the world is chronicled on this site with wayyy more posts per day. I’d rather see it mixed in with this fluff than see only depressing “2017 is a dumpster fire” stories. We might all need to read those, but we could all use a little levity too. Bring on the silly Blade Runner video, T. Swift.

    • magnolia says:

      Have you seen (either new, or old) Blade Runner? This isn’t anything Blade Runner. This is pure Ghost In The Shell.

  16. Monsy says:

    I really liked her 1989 and Red and I still listen those songs to this day. But I feel pretty meh about her 3 new songs. And tbh, her first single and video were really off putting, at least for me. An anthem of the bully blaming the victim, an ode to not take responsibility for your mistakes and holding grudges because someone dare to tell the truth and exposed her lies. That narrative exhausts me. Reminds me of Trump. The timing and the message conflict me too much for me to enjoy her new music.

    Just go away.

    • magnolia says:

      Me too! I genuinely liked Red and 1989, and even though Swift annoys me, music wise I was hoping at least we’d get some more hits…there’s something a bit jarring about these songs.

      The video w/the bathtub and the gun was so brutally cruel and insensitive. I dont like the Kardashians, but really – she thinks she’s morally bulletproof and can do no wrong with That??

  17. mkyarwood says:

    This. Thirsty. Hack.

  18. Sassback says:

    Where the f are people getting Bladerunner from? I just watched 2049 in theaters and the first one at home beforehand and the bodysuit is definitely more Ghost in the Shell.

    As for the songs, I hate …Ready For It-only the chorus is good. I liked LWYMMD way more than most people.

  19. Madly says:

    She is not sexy at all.

    And she is releasing so much stuff at once to hide how much her songs are sinking on the radio charts. Look sunk faster out of the top ten spot than any other song in radio chart’s history. Her super fans can’t save it.

    • magnolia says:

      I haven’t heard any of her new songs on the radio since they started coming out! I was wondering if I was the only one.

  20. DiligentDiva says:

    I don’t get why she doesn’t admit to the breast surgery. It’s obvious she had it. Their’s nothing wrong with it either. She had a flat chest before and wanted a bigger one that she felt comfortable with. What’s the harm in that.

    • Julianna says:

      It’s weird. For a while she had super, super fake looking implants, the kind that just look like rock hard orbs shoved haphazardly under the skin, and she was continually wearing these tight push up bra tops that made it so you could really clearly see the ridges of the implants. She would have spotted that immediately, but still, for months she kept wearing things that showed off her sub-par plastic surgery. She obviously knows how these things work, she knew it would be noticed, so she wanted people to notice and talk, but she doesn’t want to actually acknowledge it.

      I don’t care if people get work done, I’ve had work done. But if you’re going to get really obvious work done and then pointedly parade it around, it then comes off super weird when you deny it or act insulted that anyone would even wonder.

    • ModelT says:

      Why would one need to admit to boob surgery? That’s her business. Haha. Y’all have some nerve.

  21. Madly says:

    Saw some stills as I won’t watch the video. That body suit has leg padding in it. Or am I wrong and that is another person’s body. Definitely not hers.

    • Dj Jazzy Jen says:

      Yeah the legs definitely made me look twice. Once for being super jealous because whoevers legs those are some serious leg goals and then again because even though she gained some weight, I don’t see her doing it by weight training. I could totally be wrong, either way I’m jealous though.

    • ModelT says:

      Why do y’all find it hard to accept that the woman has gained ALOT of weight? The lwmmd video especially the dance portion she has extremely thick thighs now in comparison to the 1989 tour. She said she gained 15 pounds but its more like 30. She looks fine as she was way under weight. The problem us women who don’t like her used to have fun saying her body looked like a 12 year old boy. Bab she gained a few pounds now had curves and you’re mad. Thick Taylor looks to be here to stay.

      • Dj Jazzy Jen says:

        Um no, not a problem that she gained “A LOT” of weight according to you. I don’t at all think you can say anything she gained was a lot actually. The thighs in the video don’t simply didn’t fit what she had in the video before. It’s not hate or shaming, I straight up said it was jealously of whoevers legs those were. Stop looking for anything to complain about.

  22. Margo S. says:

    Taylor swift looks like Benedict Cumberbatch.

  23. Erica_V says:

    How is anyone not seeing the clear movie reference? The electricity? The naked down on one knee pose? It’s Terminator Taylor!!!

    I am alone in feeling this way but I am SO EXCITED FOR THIS VIDEO!!!

  24. Scout says:

    Prepare yourselves for Martyr Swift, there’s a scene where she is standing on top of some elevated platform serving a Christ-like pose with “They Burn All of the Witches” written across the screen as men in dark clothing rush toward her.

    • Lucy says:

      Ahh yes you got all that from a 3 second clip…🙄

      • Scout says:

        No, honey, I got that from her fans but it’s hilarious you’d get pressed over a random comment on celebitchy. This is going to be a rough video premiere ride for you, babes!

    • magnolia says:

      @Scout I saw that too!

      @Lucy,
      put your big girl pants on and chill.
      dont let facts offend you, otherwise life will.

  25. Boodiba says:

    I liked the other two songs a lot better than the snipped of this one!

  26. magnolia says:

    Is it just me or does the song lyrically not fit the music video preview at all?

  27. ModelT says:

    Looks like toms getting the silent treatment. His fans are so mad. Its called breaking up and not wasting time on the wrong person. She did not want to be like
    Susannah Fielding and spend 3 years with him and still end up with nothing. So she spent three weeks and sent him packing. What’s wrong with that?

    • Cranberry says:

      Well it was closer to three months not three weeks. Plus Tom’s fans don’t believe it was a real relationship no matter how much they both tried to play it up as one. Even if they were just having some fun and messing around, they both tried to sell it as something more meaningful for the sake of her tween fandom mostly, and he agreed for the pr. Don’t think there was any love loss for either of them.

      • ModelT says:

        I don’t think Taylor believed it was a real relationship either hence no songs and why she broke up with him because he wanted to force her to attend the emmys with him while his fans had a campaign to keep her away. Let’s just for get that three weeks/months ever happened. It was clearly a huge mistake that lasted only seconds a full year ago. Let’s let the tom Taylor thing go. His fans might have thought it was fake but they are still talking about it as if it were real butt hurt that she dared to exclude his existence in “Gorgeous”. Meanwhile the “tween” swifties have moved on as if they are the adults. They are partying with Taylor at her house. Tom? Does not know his fans exist and certainly would not invite those freaky women into his house. Swifties win.

    • jetlagged says:

      If you think his fans are mad, you are following the wrong fans. There was dancing in the metaphorical streets of Hiddlestown when they split, and I for one will be overjoyed if that stupid t-shirt in the first video is the one and only reference we get (which was bad enough). When they first got together, his fans were the ones saying it was a summer fling at best and gave it three months max, while her fans were fantasizing about the wedding dress and picking out names for the children they would have.

      • ModelT says:

        When they split which was a year ago they were happy because they thought he did the dumping. When they learned she replaced his ass in may the laughter her turned to tears. They cannot stand her saying all these songs are about Joe as if tom never existed. Taylor is getting her payback now and I’m enjoying watching it. His GQ interview he was trying hard to win her back little did he know a man ten years younger had already won.

      • jetlagged says:

        Do you really think that GQ article was him expressing honest heartbreak or wanting to reconcile? LMAO. If anything, it was designed to take away any ammunition she had in her continuing effort to paint him as a famewhore who didn’t care about poor, innocent Taylor at all. That nonsense might have eventually worked too (you certainly bought it), but once the GQ interview came out all the stories from Taylor sources saying he was “just using her for her fame” disappeared overnight. Checkmate.

        p.s. Yes, please let’s pretend those three weeks/months never happened.

      • ModelT says:

        Jetlagged he had it bad for her. He showed up to an ed sheeran concert hoping to run into her as she was clearly not taking his calls. He was totally hurt when he learned about Joe which is why his fans new mission is to put Joe down. Of course he looks young compared to tom. Tom is not only ten years older but tom looks ten years older then his actual age. So he really has twenty years on Joe so they call him baby Joe as an insult. Why not old tom, instead? Joe looks his age, tom does not.. Anyway let’s move on forever but as long as you tom fans continue putting your noses where they do not belong, it’ll never end.

        Her painting him as a fame whore is only in your little toxic mind. What don’t you get about her forgetting his name? That means he will be painted with NOTHING as he is not remembered. Maybe if Joe hadn’t come along tom would have gotten the fame whore treatment you feel he deserves. Lucky for tom Joe has taken up all the album space.

      • Cranberry says:

        @ModelT
        No. Most Tom’s fans were releaved the “huge mistake” was finally over. Tom gracefully exited expressing nothing but respect and stated they were still friends. He over expressed this sentiment in the GQ article, but over embellishing compliments and adoration is something Tom is known for doing as anyone that’s followed him can attest to.
        My criticism of TS and her song is more about how tacky she is trying to shade and get back at everyone. If Tom’s fans are sore it’s because Tom didn’t get anything but grief, even from his own fans, being with TS. In part that’s his own fault, but it’s also about who she is too and all the petty pr strategies she circulates. Trying to make herself look better by saying Tom was too public while this is as much her MO as it ever was his, does not jive and only confirms her snake ways.
        In regards to the Gorgeous song, it just doesn’t make sense to the timing of when that song was probably being written and produced in the studio, and the fact that more people are going to think it’s about Tom because his many fans that think of him as just that. But to each their own. It’s more about putting the record straight since Tom won’t revisit this juvenile mess and Taylor can craft whatever narrative she wants to her tween minions.

      • jetlagged says:

        If you look closely, YOU were the first one to mention Tom’s name on an article about Taylor, so who is it that can’t let it go? As for minding my own business, I’ve never responded very well to being told to sit down and shut up, so that won’t fly. I’ll comment where I want about what I what, thank you very much.

      • ModelT says:

        Jetlagged I mentioned tom because the link to this article was on one of his toxic fan sites where they said you were “ripping” taylor apart that’s why I am ripping him a new one because I know you are all tom fans (for the most part) in here. Come on I recognize you all. Talking about a boob job that tom will never touch so what difference does it make. Tom might be padding his briefs and Taylor would know, you wouldn’t.

        Cranberry toms huge mistake is his own mouth which is why they are keeping him off Thor promo on his own. They don’t want another golden globe mess where he has to run and apologize like a big puss. Keep him in line Tessa. But don’t get personally involved unless you want to be used and have nothing to show for it after it ends but his toxics on your tail for the next five years when he’s finally able to get someone else to date him.

        Let me add that I know tom has to have some good fans who don’t care about Taylor at all and they will not be in here reading and posting insults about her. My post are aimed at his toxic fans who are flooding Taylor topics after a year. You know who you are that is why you are here.

      • Madly says:

        @jetlagged, don’t bother. This is clearly a troll with no connection to reality.

      • ModelT says:

        I’m a troll with no connection to reality yet you think Gorgeous is or was about Tom until she “changed it to Joe”. Like she didn’t have time in the past year that she’s been dating him to dedicate songs all to her boyfriend so she had to grab a song written for an ex (she only dated mere weeks) who she really thought was the gorgeous one. You claim the rs was PR and that you don’t care about it but you’re hopping from post to post trying to in someway associate tom with her songs. Even you know she’s the best thing tom ever had and got him the most press of any kind PRIOR to his golden globe speech. He topped that on his own. Making a fool out of yourself on national TV by playing white savior will always get you the most attention of your life.

      • Cranberry says:

        Hey ModelT, you’re the one that sounds like an out of control TS stan. Raagnarok has a big, all-star cast, and Tom is not the main lead anyway. Btw he’s already attended premiers and Comic Con Ragnarok panel along with the rest of the cast. So I don’t know what you’re talking about. Marvel would never block Tom form a promo tour because they’re afraid or embarrassed of what he might say. They know him very well and how much Marvel fans love him. If he doesn’t attend all the world wide premiers then good, he shouldn’t have to, there’s plenty of other cast members that should be promoting Thor 3.

        For the record, I didn’t like Taylor and her corporate music well before the “Big Mistake” of Tiddles. Much of my TS comments are criticisms about her music, her business or her petty and manipulative behavior in all sorts of situations other than Tom. And as far as TS being the best thing Tom ever had, well how could that be if it wasn’t a real relationship. Even if you believe it was a 3 mo. good time hang out (doubt it), as you mentioned he’s definitely had better with Susannah.

      • Madly says:

        Yep, a troll. A troll who just spits out every rumor on the internet and thinks it is real. It been hilarious reading your posts actually. Do keep it up, with all the sex scandals going on, the delusional ranting you have given use has been a nice distraction.

    • Madly says:

      On the contrary, tom fans would love to pretend the whole thing never happened either. But since it was not real, who cares? It was just a PR tool that backfired.

  28. RandomThoughtGenerator says:

    I just wanted to add; this looks exactly like Ghost In The Shell. Her bodysuit is almost exactly like Scarlet’s. It’s so eerily similar that it already makes me dislike the video. I’m all for fun, dramatic music videos but eh.

  29. Marcus says:

    I never thought a woman in a nude body suit could look un-sexy, but she has the sex appeal of a crash test dummy. If this is supposed to be her “sexy” phase, she is about to fail miserably. She should go back to the singer/songwriter plain Jane country stuff, as it suits her better. Other pop artists have already done the sexy club bangers bigger and better than she would ever be capable of. This is simply embarrassing.

  30. Uumm says:

    I’m low key shook but it might just be the ambien kicking in?! Taylor nude? Doing science fiction…? I seriously can’t wait to hate this video but begrudgingly admire the cinematography and styling omg. Thank you for giving me something to do tomorrow in class!