Octomom videos may violate child labor laws; Gloria Allred chimes in again

fp_2167916_suleman_nadya_fp_050609
RadarOnline has been cited by the California Department of Labor for allegedly violating child labor laws by featuring Nadya Suleman’s newborns in short video segments on their site. Radar didn’t obtain working permits for any of Suleman’s 14 children, but they maintain that they’re a news organization and are not required to get permits. Of course celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred is jumping on this latest issue to claim yet again that Suleman is not a fit mom. I am torn on this because I don’t know who to dislike more, Suleman or Allred:

Nadya Suleman and her mouthpiece website, RadarOnline, are feeling the heat from California officials for child-labor violations involving Octomom’s brood.

State Labor Commissioner Angela Bradstreet alleges the entertainment site failed to take out the requisite permits before videotaping Octotots Noah and Isaiah and ignored laws governing the amount of time the infants could be on camera.

And that could just be the tip of the iceberg.

Department of Labor spokesman Dean Fryer says the alleged violations occurred March 17 and involve the very first videos of the newborns.

“The investigation remains open,” he stresses, adding that unless Radar gets compliant with the law, it could face additional sanctions, since the children have been seen in videos since their March debut.

So far, Radar has been cited for the following: failure to have a permit for employing minors, punishable by a $500 fine; failure to have an entertainment permit for two children, doubling the fine to $1,000; working outside the law’s set hours, punishable by another $1,000; and failure to have a supervisor and/or teacher, which is another $500.

Per state guidelines, infants are only allowed to”work” between 9:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. and between 2:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m., and can only be on camera for no more than 20 minutes at a time.

Radar, owned by America Media Inc., which also operates the National Enquirer, has until July 7 to appeal.
Chris Myers, Radar’s executive editor, did not return phone calls seeking comment.

The agency initiated its investigation May 4, three weeks after Suleman signed a contract giving Radar exclusive rights to document her 14 children, including the octuplets born in January.

“It came to our attention that RadarOnline announced they were going to provide footage of the children,” says Fryer.

And apparently another of Suleman’s antagonists, gadfly lawyer Gloria Allred, has had a hand in the state probe. “She’s been helpful. We interviewed for her as part of our investigation,” adds Fryer.

At a press conference this afternoon, Allred said that it is “clear the babies are in danger.”

“Because Nadya Suleman has chosen to commercially exploit her babies by allowing them to be filmed, she and those with whom she has contracts must follow the law which exists for the protection of these innocent babies,” she told reporters.

“The entertainment industry, the media, and Nadya Suleman are now on notice that the health, safety, and welfare of these babies is paramount. The message has now been sent loudly and clearly that the babies’ rights may not be sacrificed or violated simply because others wish to profit.”

[From RadarOnline]

I like Radar and find them much classier than some of the other big gossip sites. (*cough* TMZ) They did seem to be lightly goading Suleman in the video in which they showed her the Kate Gosselin bikini photos, but it was Suleman who flipped out while the interviewer remained normal, and it made for some good footage so I can’t blame them. As for filming the babies, if they need permits they should probably get them now along with limit filming to the hours allowed by the state.

It’s not like the videos on Radar are centered on the children, though, and they’re not making a reality show. The clips feature Suleman and they do show the kids, but it’s more about their crazy mom. Radar just had a video yesterday showing one of the newborns at the end after Suleman spouted off about Kate Gosselin again. I’d much rather watch the adorable babies than hear Suleman’s latest rant.

How much do you want to bet Allred is the one who called the Department of Labor so that she could continue to stir the sh*t on Suleman? I’m in no way suggesting that Suleman is a good mother, but she doesn’t seem bad enough to warrant taking her children away. Allred is a nasty person who continues to milk this situation for publicity. It just makes me shake my head.

Nadya Suleman is shown not supporting her infant’s head on 5/5/09. Credit: Fame Pictures

fp_2167876_suleman_nadya_fp_050609

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Octomom videos may violate child labor laws; Gloria Allred chimes in again”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nina says:

    Octomom Nadya makes me sick. I’m tired of people who don’t work and exploit their children. Larry Birkhead also sells videos and pictures of Anna Nicole’s daughter, he will have a Reality Show on E! soon. He doesn’t have a job for years, little girl pays his bills. He is non-stop in night clubs in West Hollywood. Perhaps Nadya and Larry can make a Reality Show together.

  2. Aleksa says:

    Shouldn´t the baby´s head on the top pic be supported??

  3. Annicka says:

    When it comes to Octomom, I will always, always take Gloria Allred’s side. I will take the side of anyone who condemns her as an unfit parent.

  4. tasteT says:

    I was also wondering about the baby’s damn head slung back..

    I can’t…

  5. dew says:

    Put your octohand under that baby’s neck!

    If RadarOnline is paying Octomom for taping, then I guess child labor laws could apply.

  6. Someone says:

    She says she wouldn’t even be on that interview chair, yet she is always giving interviews!!! I have said it once and i will say it again: radaronline supposedly films her every move as a mom, but all they seem to show is her giving interviews. This is all she does; SHE IS NEVER SHOWN TAKING CARE OF HER KIDS!!! If she didn’t want her kids on camera, she shouldn’t have invited radaronline to film her! Instead of showing her as a mom and what she is really like, they send out the message that she never takes care of her kids, which makes the world hate her even more!

  7. Karolan DiGiacomo says:

    I’ve been wondering if I was the only one noticing that the Octonut doesn’t know how to properly hold a baby. Those little necks need to be supported and the babies should not be held vertically against her body. I also noted she has been doing this since she brought them home from the hospital. You would think that someone at Kaiser Permamente would teach Octomon how to properly hold an infant. Wonder if this is one of the reported violations filed on her. She is obviously going to “do it her way” regardless of what is best for the babies. Is California Child Welfare going to rescue them or will one or more have to be harmed first?

  8. Helen says:

    Looks good on her…Child exploiter.Looks like she`s got more than she can handle. I just sit back and wonder why, someone would burden themselves with all those kids? They must be extremely greedy and pretentious. I can only young kids for so long then I go crazy. No amount of money in the world would motivate me to have 8 babies at a time..sick women

  9. Andie G. says:

    That is no way to hold a baby. My neck hurts just looking at this picture.

  10. Lenora says:

    That kid looks a little too old to be in diapers. I’m also wondering about all the people who have been complaining about spanking children. She is physically pulling him up, shouldn’t she just “talk to him and ask nicely” or “take away a privelege” to get him to stand up?