Jennifer Lawrence: ‘I think the problem is guns, not the entertainment industry’

71st EE British Academy Film Awards - Press Room

In The Week of Jennifer Lawrence, some J-Law stories have fallen through the cracks, because that’s just the way it goes. Jennifer is so good at blanketing the media during promotional tours that it becomes an embarrassment of riches for entertainment journalists and bloggers. So many quotes, so little time. All of which to say, I totally missed the fact that she made a comment on guns, gun control and whether the Hollywood glamorization of violence is partially to blame for the prevalence of gun violence in America. She said:

“I think that, you know, we’re the entertainment industry. At some point, there has to be a separation between politics and the entertainment industry or we’re going to suffer. It’s an art, and it’s an art to entertain. And as an industry, we will suffer, and people need to take that responsibility upon themselves [and not just blame Hollywood]. The same kind of violence is in different parts of the country that don’t have as many problems as we do…I think the problem is guns not the entertainment industry.”

[From Elle]

Seeing her comments (from an interview on the red carpet, where she admitted to being absolutely wasted) in print makes them seem… scattered. I think she’s saying “don’t blame Hollywood for gun violence” but she just goes about it in a weird way. Here’s the video:

Jennifer also chatted with the Washington Post, and most of this is typical self-conscious, self-aware celebrity navel-gazing, but there were a few interesting passages:

She’s chill — if not exactly thrilled — when she’s asked what it’s like to miss out on this year’s Oscar season, despite leaving it all on the field as a woman driven to emotional extremes in Darren Aronofsky’s “Mother!” last fall. “I’m having a fine time,” Lawrence says. “I hopefully will have a long career ahead of me, I have good friends who are going, I’m happy for them. I think watching the [Golden] Globes from home with my friend, eating pizza was, like, the best night. I’m like, ‘This is where it’s at.’”

She pauses for a sip of tea. “Did that sound cocky? I feel like people can’t hear the inflection of my voice. Because sometimes I read things back and I’m like, ‘What the [expletive]? Who the [expletive] do you think you are?’ Because really, I’m deeply insecure, everybody, so . . .” Her voice trails off before she adds an aside with a half-deprecating laugh. “Not really.”

“I don’t feel like there’s any reason for me not to act like a normal person,” Lawrence explains about what critics insist is her calculatedly unpretentious persona. “It’s as simple as that. I really can’t take credit for it. I have not seen yet a reason why I should act differently.” Should that reason arise, she assured her public, “I’ll turn into a total a–hole. Mark my words.”

[From The Washington Post]

This is actually the second year in a row where Jennifer has “missed out” on being nominated for major awards. It wouldn’t be so notable but for the fact that for what felt like five solid years, she was being nominated for every one of her performances. It was overkill and she was incredibly overexposed, and I think she knew that too. That being said, she wanted ‘Mother!’ to do well. She had her Oscar campaign all geared up for it. She was even doing Best Actress roundtable discussions last December. She really hoped that she would get nominated for that role. So are you a little bit sad for her that she didn’t? I’m not. I am, however, sad that she’s not going to be an Oscar presenter.

88th Annual Academy Awards - Red Carpet Arrivals

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

13 Responses to “Jennifer Lawrence: ‘I think the problem is guns, not the entertainment industry’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. laryy says:

    Needs a break from it all, just a year or less.

    • Sunglasses Aready says:

      A two year break is much needed here. She means well, but she needs to stop talking. She needs to come back strong with a good script or a lady cop TV series.

  2. Lightpurple says:

    Trump, the NRA, and other Republicans are claiming that violence in movies, TV, and video games plays a greater role in mass shootings than guns so I think she’s responding to that.

    And those supporting that theory need to learn about Brenda Spencer. Spencer didn’t even have a radio. Her father gave her a Ruger instead, which she used to shoot up an elementary school.

    • wolf says:

      If you’d bothered to even read her parole hearing you’d know her mother left her and she slept in the same bed as her father who was suspected of sexually abusing her. She was regularly abusing drugs and alcohol. The school psychologist said she needed to be hospitalized. And on and on.

      Discourses about guns are important but not recognizing that there are many other issues at play which warrant the same amount of discourse is dim. Simple answers are for simpletons.

  3. minx says:

    I have to say she looks beautiful in each of these outfits.

  4. Sara says:

    I agree with her that it’s not entertainment influencing these massacres. Because these films and video games are released in other countries that do not have a gun massacre epidemic.

    It’s gotten so frustrating because the majority of us now know this, and politicians still think they can slide this one by us. It’s the lax gun laws, stupid.

  5. Rocky says:

    American productions dominate Canada airwaves and Canadian productions are just as violent. The difference is access to guns

    • Tessy says:

      There’s more than enough violence in Canada too. We may not have the school shootings, touch wood but there are plenty of shootings and killing going on. I don’t * blame* the entertainment industry but they don’t help. Over the years it has become so graphic that I refuse to watch because it makes me feel physically sick.

      Nobody will ever convince me that a steady diet of violent “entertainment” doesn’t desensitize a person and make them more capable of doing something themselves.

  6. Steph says:

    I think she needs a break and go back to the basics. Maybe indie or TV road. She wanted to be a movie star and I guess she wasn’t strong enough to take the ups and downs of stardom.

  7. Nicole says:

    Um no because she didn’t deserve a nom for Joy or AH at all. She was rapidly approaching Meryl Streep levels of stupid (not her fault but still). Mother wasn’t good. It was a pretentious hot mess and I dont feel bad at all when actors of color will turn out performances that blow away white mediocrity and still miss out. So no.
    Second is she not aware she’s already at asshole levels already? Because her last few promotions have been exhausting between the offensiveness, the utter stupidity, the drinking, etc. All for some pretty bad movies. Its (yet again) lack of self-awareness

    And she’s right about the guns and entertainment so at least she got that right this week.

  8. Ankhel says:

    It isn’t just access to guns though. Norway has approximately two million guns, and five million inhabitants. We should have hundreds of shooting deaths each year, if gun numbers was everything. There are usually 5-15, out of 30-40 violent deaths.

    The surrounding culture matters. The US just has this fixation on guns, crime, and lurking danger from fellow citizens. In many other countries, guns are primarily seen as tools for soldiers and hunters. Not something you have in case you need/want to kill people some day.

    IMO, people with a healthy ideas about guns can be exposed to violence in films, games and music, because it’s viewed as fantasy. Civil war, riots and home invasions aren’t something they think about. How would people who are more dangerously intrigued by gun violence to begin with react to such themes in films etc? I don’t know. Restricted access to guns would help limit shootings, but wouldn’t treat the root of the problem – the gun culture, fear and distrust.

    • Elena says:

      Consider the NRA along with their buddies the GOP and other prominent conservatives have brainwashed American citizens into thinking this way. The most laughable are those individuals who argue they need their guns to protect themselves against the government. If the United States government wanted to come after you, your gun isn’t going to save you. The 2nd amendment WAS originally put into place to protect against government tyranny. However it was meant for states to be able to form “well regulated militias” in order to do that. Not for Uncle Skeeter and his paranoia. NRA/GOP have skewered the meaning of the 2nd amendment in order to brainwash people like him into buying more guns. More guns = more money for them.

  9. NeoCleo says:

    Her hair in the top photo is awful: lank and dirty-looking. I just don’t understand this.