Nick Loeb is making an anti-abortion movie called ‘Roe v. Wade’, of course

Screening of Marvel's 'Avengers: Age of Ultron'

Recently, we discussed the lengths Nick Loeb has gone to claim ownership or “custody” of the embryos he created with Sofia Vergara more than four years ago. I think the embryos were created five or six years ago, but Sofia and Nick’s breakup happened four years ago, and ever since then, Loeb has been court-hopping and jurisdiction-hopping, trying to find some judge who will find his dumb argument worthy. Loeb’s argument is that the embryos have a “right to life,” and that he simply could not go and find someone else and have a child with someone new. No, he needs these two remaining embryos, regardless of Sofia’s rights to keep them frozen indefinitely. In case you couldn’t tell by now, Loeb is anti-choice, anti-reproductive rights and anti-woman. And here’s the latest wrinkle: he’s “directing” a movie called Roe v. Wade. From The Hollywood Reporter:

As Nick Loeb walked to his car with a production assistant during a day of shooting his upcoming feature film, Roe v. Wade, outside Tulane University last week, a woman wearing a headset approached and asked: “Are you the director?”

“When I told her I was, she told me to go f–k myself,” Loeb recalls. “Then she threw her headset on the ground and walked off. I found out later she was our electrician.”

Anecdotes such as this have become fairly common since Loeb and his production partner, Cathy Allyn, began shooting their pro-life feature film June 15 in and around New Orleans. While Loeb has been in the news in recent years because of his ongoing custody battle over frozen embryos with former girlfriend Sofia Vergara of Modern Family, there’s been little information about the filmmaker’s new project, save for a flurry of articles five weeks ago alleging that Facebook wasn’t allowing him to use its platform to raise money for the story of the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that guaranteed a woman’s right to an abortion.

The radio silence — until now — has been by design, both for the security of the cast and crew and in order to obtain shooting locations. To accomplish the latter, Loeb and Allyn have been shooting the film, which will wrap principal photography around July 15, under a fake title that the pair will not disclose.

The film has been under such tight wraps that even the major cast members had not been revealed; Two Supreme Court justices are played by a couple of Hollywood’s more outspoken conservatives, Jon Voight and Robert Davi, and other justices are played by Corbin Bernsen, John Schneider, Steve Guttenberg, William Forsythe, Wade Williams and Richard Portnow. Stacey Dash, the Clueless star and former Fox News commentator who withdrew from a congressional race as a Republican three months ago, claiming the campaign had become “detrimental to the health and well-being of my family,” plays Mildred Jefferson, the first black woman to graduate from Harvard Medical School and the former president of National Right to Life.

Loeb and Allyn say that the timing is perfect for their film, since the Roe v. Wade decision has been in the news due to Justice Anthony Kennedy announcing on June 27 he will retire from the Supreme Court, giving President Trump the opportunity to potentially appoint a judge who will tilt the court toward overturning the case.

“But even without that news, it’s one of the most controversial political decisions in history. It divides us and makes us uncomfortable,” says Loeb, adding that his own battle with Vergara over access to embryos they created has informed the film. “I have my own pro-life issue going on with my fight over embryos, but no one has really told the whole truth about Roe v. Wade in a film. When I delved into this, I discovered conspiracy theories, fake news, made-up statistics and a whole lot of people involved who switched their positions from pro-choice to pro-life, including Norma.”

[From THR]

There’s a lot of anecdotal information in the piece about how various people employed by the production have quit when they realized what the film was about. Loeb makes it sound very “woe is me, the liberals are out to get me, all I’m trying to do is make a humble film about how women are sub-human.” Personally, I’m not “uncomfortable” discussing abortion or reproductive rights – the only people who think the subject matter is “uncomfortable” are the ones trying to make America into Gilead. This guy, my God. I hope Sofia is super-embarrassed she was with him for so many years. He’s an utter tool.

The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) presents 'To the Rescue! New York' - Arrivals

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

62 Responses to “Nick Loeb is making an anti-abortion movie called ‘Roe v. Wade’, of course”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Jess says:

    This dude gives me stalker/murderer vibes for real. He’s taken this shit far enough and clearly doesn’t plan on stopping, it’s beyond obsessive and scary.

    • AnotherDirtyMartini says:

      Agree, Jess. He is beyond creepy.

      Re the cast members, Stacey Dash aside, I didn’t realize all those actors were Conservatives. And heehee! Steve Guttenberg as a Supreme Court Judge. That’s hilarious! I know a woman, Martha Frankel, who interviewed SG years ago for a magazine I used to love called Movieline. When she met him, he insisted she call him “Stevie”. So weird & random.

      • tealily says:

        I have to wonder if some of these folks aren’t conservatives, just desperate for a paycheck.

      • holly hobby says:

        Yeah I think some are desperate for a paycheck. Whatever, that roster sounds embarrassing. I think Jon Voight is the only award winning actor attached to this and he won that award in the 70s. He’s been irrelevant for years.

    • Littlefishmom says:

      Yes Jess! I was JUST going to write that he is creepy. Something is way off with this guy.

  2. tealily says:

    I walked by the set not knowing what was being filmed and it looked chintzy, that’s all I’m saying. Also, I wish I’d known Nick Loeb was there so that I could tell him to go f–k himself too.

  3. Neelyo says:

    He makes movies? I just thought he was some low level grifter who’d managed to sweet talk himself into the level of show business where he could meet someone like Vergara.

    Why isn’t James Woods playing one of the Supremes? Probably too busy tweeting or hoovering cocaine.

  4. Laura says:

    Uuuuuggggggggggg – just go away. How horrible that we are still having this argument. There are always going to be unwanted pregnancies so make access to abortion safe and legal or women are going to go back to dangerous ways that can kill them.

    Both sides want less unplanned/unwanted pregnancies and the best way to do that is to support comphrensive sex education.

    • Kate says:

      One side wants less unplanned/unwanted pregnancies.
      The other side, the anti-choice side, wants less freedom for women and could not care less about babies or even pregnancy in itself. (I know some like to call them pro forced birth but they don’t care enough about the birth to provide affordable prenatal care sooooo).

      • tealily says:

        That’s not true. There are plenty of people who actually view abortion as murder. They want to outlaw the practice, because they view it as legalized genocide. A lot of those same people also have problems with birth control, and think that if you don’t want kids you shouldn’t be having sex, period. It’s your fault if you get pregnant, and if you can’t take care of the kid that’s your fault too and you should have thought about that before you had sex. The old, familiar, pigheaded bootstraps holier-than-thou my-ideals-apply-to-everyone attitude we’ve all come to know pretty well lately. No solutions, just judgement.

      • Pineapple says:

        Ah Kate, this is exactly one of the problems. Not interested in providing for the “Moms” they are forcing to birth. It’s just exhausting.

      • Original T.C. says:

        Until “pro-life” people prove they really care about live human beings, live children instead of propaganda to control women and women’s sexuality I don’t take their so-called belief seriously. They are anti-choice people who came up with a nifty label. As I predicted from the beginning this guy just wants to destroy Sofia. He wants to shame her and label her a “child killer” to end her endorsements deals. She is on to him and has stayed quiet, letting her lawyer’s do the work.

    • Muriel says:

      He’s not forcing her to be pregnant. Why do people care that he wants to give his own children a chance? How is this “anti-choice”?

      • Lex says:

        They are not children and this is abusive behaviour to a tee.

      • Muriel says:

        @Lex He is the father. I’m not trying to be provocative. He is their father, and they are his progeny. Why not give them a chance?

      • whatWHAT? says:

        “He is their father, and they are his progeny. Why not give them a chance?”

        and Vergara is their “mother” and she doesn’t want them implanted and brought to full term. and the two of them (BOTH OF THEM) signed an agreement that they had to agree on what happens to them, either implant or destroy. they cannot agree, so the embryos stay frozen.

        that being said…if he wants kids so badly, surely he can find another woman to have his kids. there are plenty of young women with viable eggs who will happily take a check to act as surrogate.

        no, he just wants to control Vergara, and that’s all this is about. keeping her under his thumb, keeping her “close”, and keeping control.

  5. Kate says:

    What a revolting, unrepetent, utter piece of tr*ash.

  6. Millenial says:

    If you were so pro-life, Nick, you wouldn’t have made IVF embryos in the first place.

    • holly hobby says:

      Yep he would have had those babies in a “biblical” way. Sorry these faux religious freaks think they can have it both ways.

    • Muriel says:

      What a horrible thing to say. If we need fertility help, that’s as legitimate a way to have children as any other.

      • D says:

        Nick Loeb claims that embryos are equivalent to living children. He has also stated that “In my view, keeping them frozen forever is tantamount to killing them”

        The IVF industry allows people to have any “left-over” frozen embryos discarded/destroyed if they don’t want additional kids. Furthermore, it is not illegal to stop paying embryo storage fees, which is why there’s hundreds of thousands of abandoned frozen embryos just laying around unclaimed in the U.S. alone.

        So no, if Nick Loeb was sincere, he would not voluntarily participate in & financially support an industry that (according to his stated beliefs) is responsible for killing thousands of children every year.

  7. Jenns says:

    So disappointed in Corbin Bersen. F each and every one of those actors and I hope their fake movie to get permits and access to locations gets them sued out of their last dollar.

    • holly hobby says:

      Now that the cast is ID’d. I’m sure people can spot them and have the permits revoked.

    • Ankhel says:

      Yes. I watched Bernsen on TV growing up, and liked him as an actor. Genuinely disappointed to learn he wants to work with this known creepy stalker.

  8. TheOtherMaria says:

    I’m so tired of men telling women what to do with our bodies…

    Ugh.

    • Pineapple says:

      Yah, old white men. Bleck. And then if you are assaulted, raped, these same men won’t properly charge the guys who commit these crimes. It makes me want to run into the hills yelling “meeeeee tooooooooooo.”

  9. Snazzy says:

    I actually worry about SV’s safety with this tool running around. He’s obviously a control freak

    • Otaku fairy... says:

      Me too. Also, depending on where she stands on human rights issues, this is probably especially distressing for her. Not only is this creepy ex still trying to control her personally through the public, but he’s also using her in an attack on women’s rights, right in the middle of this Trump shitstorm.

  10. Beth says:

    What a shithead. Mind your own business, Loeb

    • lensblury says:

      This guy has one of the most supremely punchable faces I have ever seen! I can’t even look at his picture for more than four seconds.

      • spargel says:

        Same, lensblury.

        I feel so bad for SV and the hoops he is putting her through a la Alec Baldwin post-Kim Basinger. I doubt however she was this bastion of progressiveness herself–she willfully dated this tool and must have had a sense of his conservatism and share (shared?) some of his views. Of course, that doesn’t mean she “should have seen his abusive behaviour coming” because he likely wasn’t controlling and abusive in the beginning, and it sure in hell ain’t her fault even if he was. But no way their early convos could have indicated he was anything but a privileged wad of punchableness, politically. The taste some people have boggles the mind…

  11. OriginalLala says:

    Oh, eff this garbage! I’m so sick of men (and shitty women) trying to dictate what other women can do with their own bodies. You don’t want an abortion? don’t get one. but you have no right to dictate what other women are allowed to do with their bodies ! why is this so hard for people to understand…

    • celebs says:

      Considering he paid for 2 girlfriends’ abortions prior to meeting Sofia, he is a controlling psycho!

      • Really? says:

        Dude needs to move on. If it were the other way around, and the woman wanted to have his children via frozen embryos after they had separated, would this even be up for discussion? It is more than likely that the facility they used had them sign an agreement about what would happen to the embryos if the would be parents decided to separate. It looks like little Nicky decided to back out of his binding contract. A CA judge already ruled on a similar case with the roles reversed, and the embryos were destroyed in accordance with the contract.

      • whatWHAT? says:

        “It is more than likely that the facility they used had them sign an agreement about what would happen to the embryos if the would be parents decided to separate.”

        IIRC, there is an agreement in place, signed by both, that says they must agree on what happens to the embryos (implant or destroy); if they can’t, then the embryos simply stay frozen. which is why every judge/court before which he tries to argue his case throws it out. he keeps “jurisdiction hopping”, as Kaiser so aptly put it, hoping to find a judge who will agree with him challenging their agreement. so far, every one has seen through his BS and let the original agreement stand.

        WHICH IT SHOULD.

        simply put, the dude is a controlling stalker type who can’t get over the fact that Vergara took control of her life, dumped him, moved on, has no interest in his lame ass, and is now married to a MUCH hotter and more successful man. all he’s doing is whatever he can to maintain some sort of tie to her, some faint form of “control”.

    • JP says:

      Confirming what whatWHAT? said.

      It would take some seriously heavy lifting to get their agreed-upon contract invalidated by a court – especially since there’s already case law setting a precedent that both parties must agree on the embryos’ final use.

      And even if he could get a judge to rule in his favor, Vergara can appeal that decision rather quickly – which stays any action by the prevailing party. This guy is abusing the court system in the most despicable way.

      What a gross, sad man.

  12. AnotherDirtyMartini says:

    Go awayyyyy, buttface! Another deplorable. He’s so creepy. This is all punishment. He reminds me of those men who call themselves incels. How dare she not want ME?

  13. O says:

    Why is it anti-abortion… it is anti-choice.
    I don’t get how we got to these new terms pro-choice is now pro-abortion… which is not the same thing at all.
    If this were a “man’s” issue there wouldn’t have ever been the need for a case to go to the Supreme court… it was decided in 1973, let it go, move on, there are so many other issues that actually need attention.

    • O says:

      That said – I am a Canadian, who will never vote for any party that brings up 1) a woman’s right to choose or 2) gay marriage as issues that need to be reevaluated and luckily we have political parties up here who agree with me.

    • whatWHAT? says:

      “If this were a “man’s” issue there wouldn’t have ever been the need for a case to go to the Supreme court”

      my very liberal but very Catholic mother used to say “if men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament”.

      • Pineapple says:

        whatWHAT? I LOVE this. This is SO, SO, SO TRUE!!!!!!!!!! Why is divorce allowed in the Catholic Church??? Annulments were CREATED because a MAN wanted to divorce his wife. This should be the title of a book, “IF Men Could Get Pregnant, Abortion Would be a Sacrament”. THIS!!!!

      • OriginalLala says:

        your mom is a wise woman!!

  14. whatWHAT? says:

    wow, what a cast. a bunch of has beens and never weres…

    • Chrissy says:

      IKR. Steve Guttenburg from Police Academy I-IV? Corbin Bernsen from LA Law? SMH.

  15. Tash says:

    I see the movie managed to get who is who of Hollywood.

  16. Jay says:

    I’m not blaming Sofia for ANYTHING but tbh every time this idiot does something like this I side eye her for being with him for so long. There’s no way any of this is new for him; he likely has believed this garbage for a long time. I can’t imagine why any woman would be in a relationship with someone with such vile beliefs. (I mean, I can, but none of it is particularly pleasant. Either Sofia agrees/sympathizes in some way with these beliefs or she’s sadly familiar with them as in they were normalized for her by other people in her life such that when she met someone with those beliefs it wasn’t a red flag like it might have been for someone else.)

    • Jamie says:

      You kinda are blaming her, though. It’s been pretty well documented that she was off and on with him for years. And his attempts to coerce and control her with those embryos shows that it was a dv relationship. So there’s no real basis to “side eye” her for HIS beliefs.

    • Ankhel says:

      Well, she dumped him. Also, he didn’t use to have these opinions – as some commenters noted, he’s paid for abortions in the past. Me thinks he’s only spouting this nonsense now, to justify his stalking and revenge foolery.

    • spargel says:

      I think there’s a clear distinction between abusive/controlling assholery and political views, since conservative deplorables aren’t necessarily abusive, and progressive people can be abusive shits. So, apples and oranges. I would never blame someone for winding up in an abusive relationship. But winding up with a conservative is another matter…

  17. D says:

    Oh look a nice complete list of the most recent round of #cancelled cancellations thanks

  18. D says:

    Here’s the thing about these pro lifers. They could TALK TO MEN ABOUT NOT PHUCKING AROUND but nooooo rape is fine incest is fine complete sickos

  19. Caitrin says:

    It’s been filming at Tulane. Gross.

  20. Tara Beth says:

    Wow! This ought to be just as successful than that movie with Whoopi Goldberg about 9/11?

  21. Kate says:

    I grew up Catholic but was always pro-choice. As a kid I wasn’t sure if I would ever be able to go through with an abortion if I had an unplanned pregnancy, and thought I would probably carry it and give it up for adoption, but I supported other people’s right to decide. Now after 3 planned pregnancies, 1 miscarriage and 2 C-section deliveries, I realize that pregnancy and delivery are the hardest physical things a human can do and has so many repercussions on your body for the rest of your life. So many men think they get it but they just cannot truly empathize. From their point of view it’s just a “rough couple months.”

    I can’t imagine now going through a pregnancy and delivery to give a child up for adoption. Like everything I thought as a kid who never experienced a pregnancy was all ideals – and that’s how I see every anti-choice man and woman who has never been pregnant. You know nothing so stop talking. (Pro-choice women who have been pregnant – I don’t know what to make of them.)

  22. Jordan says:

    I have no interest. The only interest I have is knocking hypocrites off their platform. Most all of the pro-life advocates fail to perform. They sit there and complain about food stamps and the like that help but they miss the fact that pro-life means they support said life being here and therefore they are supportive of the programs used to help feed and provide shelter and care for them. You remind them that that’s exactly what pro-life means and then you see the explosion in their head.

    I have no need to see this trash film. I’d rather see a Purge that brings down the politicians and the white men who believe they run the states.

  23. Rebecca says:

    The last thing I read about him was that he and his lawyer had asked the court to exclude the names of ex girlfriends of his (before Sophia) who had abortions. (I assume they got pregnant by him and he asked them to get these abortions.) Next, he started telling reporters that he had recently changed his mind and is now pro-life. This was a couple years ago.

    This is all about his bitterness that Sophia Vergara broke up with him and married a better man. He still wants to control her. What a piece of garbage this man is.

  24. Heather says:

    I have no idea how this film can be “pro-life” unless he totally distorts the facts. This film apparently is about the Supreme Court, who ruled in FAVOR of Roe, NOT Wade. So in all the twists and turns, in the end he has no choice but to acknowledge that the Supreme Court, which seems to make up a majority of the characters, ultimately ruled in favor of the right to privacy and a woman’s right to choose. Stacy Dash’s reported character might be a red herring sort, shrilly declaring from the side lines that the Supreme Court is legalizing murder or some such. The amount of twisting he’d have to do to portray this landmark case would make it a fantasy film, not a docudrama or any other sort of fact driven narrative.

  25. CooCooCatchoo says:

    I believe this Nick character comes from an uberwealthy banking or real estate family. From what I can remember, he had a serious auto accident and Sofia, who was his fiancé, spent years helping him get well. Their relationship seemed changed once he recovered. I wonder if he suffered a closed-head injury and his personality changed? He seems so odd and vindictive, and absolutely determined to stay in her life. I bet she regrets ever creating those embryos with that nutjob. I wish Joe Manganiello would just punch him in the face.

  26. hogtowngooner says:

    So just to clear up where we are in 2018…

    Abortion: my religion makes me against it, and it should be the law for everyone, irrespective of your religion or if you don’t like it. I care about life, you know!

    Baking a cake for a gay wedding: I don’t have to follow the law because my religion exempts me from doing anything I don’t like.

    Sharia law: It’s unconstitutional, but this should be a Christian nation.

    I hate these people. They think their religion is the only one that matters.

  27. Altariel says:

    This guy is a horror and I think should be prosecuted for wasting the courts time and continually harassing Sofia. They made an agreement. Live with it.