Nick Loeb is still fighting Sofia Vergara for ‘custody’ of their embryos, 4 years later

The 2013 Hampton Classic

Either you’ve been following the years-long saga of Nick Loeb or you haven’t. There is no in-between! And there have been so many twists and turns over the years, it’s insane that we’re still talking about a breakup that happened four years ago. That was when Nick Loeb and Sofia Vergara ended their engagement and relationship, back in 2014. They had been off-and-on for a few years, but finally they were off for good. During the time when they were together, had embryos created using her egg and his sperm, to be implanted into a gestational carrier. Apparently, they tried the gestational carrier once and the pregnancy didn’t take. Then Nick and Sofia broke up, and then Nick sued Sofia for “custody” of the remaining embryos – two fertilized eggs which are currently frozen. The lawsuit has been going on for three years. Loeb keeps re-filing in different courts when the lawsuit gets thrown out. He’s working with some kind of radical anti-choice outfit now too, and the argument he’s making is that the embryos have a “right to life.”

In the past three years, Sofia has happily moved on. She married Joe Manganiello and she’s working in movies and she has a lot of side-projects. She and her lawyers keep getting dragged into court with this bullsh-t though, and it reeks of emotional abuse on Loeb’s side. He’s trying to “punish” her for moving on and he’s going through the court system to do it. Well, here’s an update on the whole thing, courtesy of Page Six:

Nick Loeb just won’t give up in his battle against ex-fiancée Sofía Vergara over their frozen embryos. Among endless legal twists, in March Loeb filed a new suit in Louisiana that Vergara says should be tossed since the case has no connection to the state. But Loeb’s lawyer, Mark Jay Heller, told Page Six that Loeb’s now moved to the Bayou state.

“My client … has triumphantly embarked on a historic path to succeed” he said, adding that Loeb “seeks full custody of their embryos” — named Emma and Isabella in legal papers. Heller said that under Louisiana law: “Loeb alleges the embryos are living children and that he should be granted full custody because Vergara is violating her high duty of care and prudent administration owed to them by refusing to allow them to have the chance to be born.”

Reps for Vergara had no comment. But those close to the star feel Loeb’s pursuing the case to punish her after their 2014 split. She’s married to Joe Manganiello. A source shared a photo with Page Six of a ramshackle address outside New Orleans that Loeb, son of a former US ambassador, is allegedly using as a residence.

Heller responded, “Nick has no animosity toward [Vergara] but is passionate about bringing to life Isabella and Emma. This is why he facilitated a trust for them, and is vigorously and successfully litigating this matter.” He had no comment on the alleged address.

[From Page Six]

This is sad. This is creepy. This is abusive. I don’t understand what he’s even trying to prove at this point – Sofia explained her side very well at the time of his initial lawsuit. Her side is that they would both have to agree to implantation and that they both have legal rights. She couldn’t implant the embryos without his say-so, and vice versa. Why is he so hung up on these embryos? Why this multi-year legal effort? It’s awful.

New York City Ballet 2015 Spring Gala

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

92 Responses to “Nick Loeb is still fighting Sofia Vergara for ‘custody’ of their embryos, 4 years later”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Astrid says:

    I feel for her and I don’t understand his motivation.

    • smcollins says:

      Same here. I can only imagine the stress this puts on her (and I’m sure Joe, too, at this point) when she’s so clearly moved on from him/this. This is beyond creepy. This guy is an emotionally abusive psychopath.

      • Jan90067 (aka imqrious2) says:

        Not only that, but he can’t have it both ways. In one quote above, he says that “the embryos are live children” (bs *cough*) and in another says “he wants to bring life to (them)”. Personally, I think the guy is psycho (and Sofia is very lucky to have gotten away!).

        They have a legal contract that both signed that states one cannot do anything with the embryos without the written consent of the other. End of discussion. If this psycho is so hellbent on having kids, let him find some clueless woman who knows nothing of him and his past (because any woman who does wouldn’t go within 10 ft of this POS), and have kids with her. JMO… YMMV of course 😊

      • ol cranky says:

        what standing do they have in Louisiana? Neither are residents there, are the embryos stored there? This whole, I’ll file in every state til I get my stuff is beyond the pale

      • KBB says:

        I think he actually filed in Louisiana before and it was tossed because neither of them were residents and the embryos are in California. Now he’s apparently claiming he is a resident of Louisiana (the ramshackle place mentioned in the page six article) so they’ll hear the case.

        Someone at the facility in California needs to accidentally lose those embryos or break the Petri dish.

        He’s a stalker and he’s obsessed with her, so he’s refusing to let her move on without forcing his way into her life against her will.

    • INeedANap says:

      I wonder if he’s been a bit brainwashed by the group representing him. He seems super sketchy anyway, but I feel like he’s been sucked into this pointless crusade.

      • KBB says:

        No way. He is using them because he thinks it will up his odds of winning. He’s an abusive psycho.

    • whatWHAT? says:

      besides (as smcollins so aptly pointed out) that he’s an emotionally abusive psychopath, he’s one of those guys who CANNOT STAND to “lose”. he needs to have the power in every aspect of his life and Vergara took that power away from him…and he cannot let it go.

    • Ruyana says:

      I think his motivation is a combination of revenge coupled with a desire to make her pay child support for eighteen years. She left him and he’s going to make her pay for it in any way he can. He’s an ugly little spud inside and out.

      • booboocita says:

        Bingo. Fiscally, she’s worth a lot more than he is. Two children would be worth eighteen years of payout. He’s a would-be Federline.

      • Jan90067 (aka imqrious2) says:

        Exactly! But I don’t think it’s so much monetary, as he wants to physically/emotionally lasso her to him for life, as a punishment for having the audacity to kick his psycho butt to the curb.

      • Pandy says:

        Kind of have to agree with Jan re physical/emotional lasso. Surely his dried onion empire is pulling in the big bucks?? He’s sick. Find a new woman to impregnate. I wish she could make the embryos “disappear”.

      • Rachelina says:


    • Felicia says:

      His motivation: if either or both of those embryos “took”, he’d have her in and out of court for the next 18 years about child support.

    • Svea says:

      The motivation is oure and simple: money. Sophia is a wealthy woman. If Loathesome Loeb succeeds in having someone carry those embryos, he will then go after her to support them if they result in children. The precedent is Sherri Shepherd.

  2. Zapp Brannigan says:

    Emotionally abusive and using the legal system to continue to disrupt her life, he is also trying to financially drain her so she can no longer fight against him, douche.

    I wonder if his end goal is to cause her marriage to end from this level of pressure, or if he is just trying to control her from afar.

    • Deanne says:

      This completely. This is all about controlling her and keeping himself in her life. It’s disgusting.

  3. LORENA says:

    This is so disturbing, the fact that he named them just adds to it. Move on! Leave Sofia alone

  4. sqss says:

    He wants that child support $$$.

    • French Girl says:

      If it will be the next step if he wins the custody of the embryos.

    • dot says:

      I am not sure that is his motive. He comes from a very wealthy family. She probably has more money than him… but who knows how much he is going to inherit later on.

      • Sherry says:

        I don’t think it’s about money either. This is about control. Other than these embryos, he has no connection to her anymore. He’s a sociopath.

  5. Lucy2 says:

    What a psychopath he is.
    I hope she doesn’t have to think about this too often and instead just has lawyers working on it for her.

  6. Lizzie says:

    Why is a judge continuing to hear this case?

    • whatWHAT? says:

      he and his (COMPLETELY UNETHICAL) lawyers keep re-filing in various states. LA being the latest.

      • holly hobby says:

        I don’t understand why he can do that in different venues. I don’t care where he resides. The issue should be decided where the embryos are kept.

      • whatWHAT? says:

        I think he’s simply doing whatever he can to keep this whole thing going and, therefore, keep Vergara “close”.

        and, in fact, the issue has already been decided. as someone above pointed out, they signed an agreement that neither one could do anything with the embryos unless the other agreed to it. I think that’s why the judges keep throwing the case out each time. as in “nothing’s changed, case dismissed”.

  7. Snowflake says:

    Poor Sophia, what a weirdo! How would it work if she was poor and couldn’t pay for a lawyer? He’s costing her a ton of money. He is psycho.

  8. Feedmechips says:

    This guy is a world class piece of shit.

  9. Myriam says:

    I’m curious. What does he do? What’s his profession?

  10. Betsy says:

    What an abusive loser. Is there no one in his life to tell him to seek intensive therapy? I agree with Lucy2 and hope that Sofia doesn’t have to expend any energy on this at all.

  11. Loopy says:

    Why is he so pressed for these embryos? Can he not physically fertilize others or have kids the old fashion way? Unless he can’t then this is especially creepy.

    • Zapp Brannigan says:

      But having children with someone else wouldn’t allow him to control Sofia. That is all this is, abuse, manipulation and control. I am guessing she ended the relationship and he is not use to someone leaving him, he is in control and he decides when you are done with each other. This is what controlling abusers do, they drag you back into their sphere of control and will use family, friends, threats of self harm or whatever it takes to get you back on the hook and under their control.

      • whatWHAT? says:

        Zapp, perfectly stated. I completely agree, it’s about control. Vergara took it back and he can’t stand it.

      • lucy2 says:

        Well said. If it was only about wanting children, he’d go find someone else (who would want this psycho!?) but it’s not, it’s about abuse and control.

    • Lovey says:

      She was criticized for it, but Sophia wanted to counter his claims by providing the names of girlfriends who had aborted Nick’s fetuses with his knowledge. She was trying to prove he doesn’t believe they are children and is just being abusive. But she was blasted for possibly violating these other women’s privAcy, so i don’t know if that ever happened.

      • KBB says:

        Not just knowledge, I think he actually paid for multiple abortions. I wish one or two of those women would come forward and help Sofia out, but obviously I understand why they wouldn’t want to.

  12. Westie says:

    He must be mentally ill. He is disturbing and frightening. This is harassment and extortion. He is desperate to try to get money but to also to abuse her. Clearly he doesn’t want to work for a living but he could have found another attractive, rich woman to date – although now I’m sure this lawsuit has wiped out those chances – what woman in their right mind would date him now? What man would be friends with him? His family must think of disowning him – this whole thing is beyond words. I can’t believe she was ever with this creep and I’m sure she can’t either.

    • Ankhel says:

      It’s worth noting that Loeb’s mother, Meta, killed her third husband and herself. They were divorcing at the time. She literally went into his work place, waited for her husband to show up, then shot him. Afterwards, she put the gun to her own head, in front of her husband’s horrified coworkers. No one understood why.

      Mental illness can be inherited at times, and I hope Sofia has ALL the bodyguards.

      • J.Mo says:

        I had never heard this before! I pray he moves on and Sofia can live in peace.

      • KBB says:

        Well she married a mountain of a man, so if she doesn’t have bodyguards she can just keep Joe close lol

  13. Peggy says:

    Jesus. What a loser.

  14. Apalapa says:

    Honestly if I were the FBI I would put him on a watch list for violence at this point. Gawker wrote continuously about what an abusive dbag he was to Vergara and how he got in fights with people who wanted pictures with her.

    I am glad she escaped, but if a woman were doing this to a man (say Stacy Keibler to George Clooney) the headlines would be calling her crazy, gold digging, unable to move on, NOT Pro life.

    I bet he has compromising pictures or something on her and that is why Vergara is just trying to make this go away. I cannot believe he thinks he can wear her down in the courts. F him.

    • Anne says:

      I don’t understand your reasoning. If he has compromising pictures of Vergara, then he would have extorted her privately and she would have done her best to keep it on the down-low, including giving him what he wants. The way she went about this – publicly, legitimately, and with proper procedure through her lawyers, shows me that actually he has no such thing on Vergara. It shows me that the only “leverage” he has are those two embryos, which is why he is constantly litigating those.

      I also don’t think he’s trying to wear her down in the courts. I think he’s throwing every legal strategy he has at the wall and hoping one sticks.

      • Apalapa says:

        They were engaged and you aren’t engaged to someone for years without having something compromising on them. He knows her and her son, her family, both here and in Colombia. If you don’t think he has made threats against one or all of the above, then I have a bridge to sell you. It is par for the course for abusers.

        If she decided to do what Chloe Dykstra did and write an article about what an abusive ex he was, without naming him even, everyone would believe her.

        Tldr: Having been similarly in her shoes, I know he has threatened her career or family in some way and that is why her PR is keeping things to the court case instead of mounting a case to put him in jail.

      • Anne says:

        What is considered compromising is in the eye of the beholder. For example, we would have thought admitting to sexual assault would be considered compromising before someone who did exactly that got elected to the white house. In this day and age, very little is considered actually compromising. Even if he has sex tapes of her, he has to have second thought about releasing them because many people empathize with the victims of revenge porn. I think in some places it’s even illegal.

        Generally speaking, most people have secrets, but not that many people have secrets so damaging they will do everything their blackmailer wants them to do. Also, people have different reactions to being blackmailed. For example, even if my husband knows every single sordid detail about me and all of my family members and threatened to tell my boss about it should we divorce, I highly doubt I would bow to the intimidation. While I wouldn’t like the things I keep quiet made public, it’s also not very damaging. And what damage I and my family do sustain, I believe it’s worth it to stand your ground with a bully.

        I’m not sure what you mean by threatening her family. If you mean by blackmail (assuming there is something blackmail-able about her family), then Sofia would hardly be countering him so confidently in the courts, which is my point in my previous post. If he does have some blackmail information on her or her loved ones, then she would just fold and give him whatever he wants, which includes the embryos. If you mean threatening them physically, I’m almost sure that Sofia herself can take him on while wearing 5 inch heels, never mind other members of her family.

        I don’t doubt he’s an abusive a-hole, and I’m sure he wants to make Sofia’s life miserable, but that doesn’t mean he has anyway to actually affect her life in any way other than with the lawsuit. In fact, his persistence with this stupid lawsuit shows me that he doesn’t have any other way to get to Sofia.

        And Sofia doesn’t have to do anything like what Chloe Dykstra did, because they are not in similar situations. Sofia is not beholden to Loeb and she’s well established enough that he can’t really hurt her that much professionally. She doesn’t have to say or write anything – I think a significant portion of people who follow celebrity news is already aware of what an abusive dingus Loeb is. It’s like her writing an essay saying that a certain type of shoes (but not naming high-heels specifically) hurt your feet – kind of a universally accepted truth.

        I don’t know what your situation is like that has skewed your opinion on this situation. I know my opinion is skewed by my own life experiences, family situation and relationship history. From where I’m standing and evaluating the situation with my own convictions and understanding of human interactions, I see in Sofia Vergara a woman who is not afraid of her ex. I see a woman who understands the kind of person her ex is and what he’s trying to do. I see a woman who understands her rights and will calmly but firmly assert them. And I see a man who’s so emasculated by his ex that he will do everything in his power to bring her down and under his power again. I don’t believe such a man is capable of having a weapon in arsenal and not using it.

        I generally think that I’m a fairly pragmatic person who would occasionally cut off her nose to spite her face. But while it sometimes leads me to make some questionable decisions, I find that the approach I take is fairly bully-repellent. Whatever your own situation is, I hope you never get taken advantaged of again and I hope you situation has a happy solution. Just remember, very few things are serious enough for it to be worth having it hanging over your head for the rest of your life. Unless it’s illegal, most things in life are only as serious and as embarrassing as you let it be.

  15. Dana says:

    “Loeb alleges the embryos are living children ”

    Interesting – I’d love for someone to ask Loeb how he reconciles his belief that embryos are “living children” with his willingness to use in vitro fertilization, a process that pretty much guarantees the destruction of at least a few embryos along the way.

    Either he’d have to admit that he doesn’t really believe embryos = living children, or say that yes, in his mind, he knowingly (and rather sociopathically) volunteered for a procedure that would create and then kill some of his own living children – their deaths were acceptable collateral damage and fundamentally less important than his personal desire to successfully reproduce with this particular woman.

    • TrixC says:

      It’s not true that IVF guarantees the destruction of embryos. I did IVF and had all my viable embryos transferred – they didn’t all result in a baby, but that’s no different to having a natural miscarriage. If you have surplus embryos you have the choice to freeze them and if you have completed your family but feel strongly they shouldn’t be destroyed you can choose to donate them to other couples.

      I’m not defending the guy, but I don’t think IVF is necessarily in conflict with pro life views.

  16. Lucy says:

    Emotional and psychological abuser. Destroy him.

  17. Jess says:

    He is awful.

  18. Delilah says:

    What I’ve never read is why Sofía and Joe went this route? Who, as Family Guy so eloquently posited, “has the bum uterus or penis?” Sorry if that’s insensitive but I, being the one with a bum piece can laugh at the joke. That said, I can emphathize with a situation where the party with the fertility issues would be more compelled to relentlessly fight for a chance to have biological children especially if it is the last and only chance. I’m married to an abusuvr man who suckered me into producing (9) embryos with him only to withdraw consent for implantation at the precipice of implantation. As this article so clearly states Both parties have equal rights and opportunity to determine whether those embryos are brought to life. My abusive husband is using the embryos to keep me in my marriage. Unfortunately for me, they likely represent my BEST not necessarily only chance to have genetic offspring. He had no fertility issues so if the marriage ends he can still have children with no issues. Those embryos were made with my most viable eggs.

    What would help put all this in context (despite being nobody’s business but their own) is answers to burning questions: 1) Who has fertility issues of the two 2) Do these embryos represent Loebs only chance to have biological children 3) Did Loeb have to succumb to invasive procedures or surgeries or endure other treatments to improve upon his fertility ? 4) What is the nature of those treatments, i.e., medicinal, surgical, etc. 5) Are those embryos—Emma and Isabella—PGS/PGD tested? (Chances are yes b/c that is the only way to know the sex in advance 6) Who contributed to payment of fertility treatments and what percentage of Both? 7) Did Sofía endure any invasive procedures surgeries beyond egg retrieval? 8) Did Sofía suffer any miscarriages in the course of her marriage to Loeb? 9) If Loeb wins some custody of the embryos do those rights extend to birthed children? 10) Would Sofía want custody in a child or children resulting from a successful pregnancy with Emma and:/or Isabella? 11) Could Loeb Sue for child support if he wins full custody of the embryos? 12) Does Sofía still have ovaries or viable eggs for that matter? 13) Does Loeb still have viable sperm?

    • Surly Gale says:

      Thank you for this perspective. The only thing I have to offer is this:
      In this current political climate, I think Sophia is at risk of losing. In our previous, (barely) more sane world, this would be over, already, I think. He gets one republican ‘pro-life’ judge and she loses all the way. This is so wrong, on so many levels. I just ache for the world every day. Now I can’t breathe….

    • Mimi says:

      They used surrogate but it didn’t work. Sofia as an A list actress didn’t want to go through pregnancy, that’s why they had a surrogate. Nick was married before (Swedish model), but he had no kids. He evidently wants Sofia’s children. He has a strong political support from right wing politicians, conservative media outlets and religious groups.

      • Allie says:

        @Mimi: Do you know for a fact that they did this because she didn’t want to go through pregnancy? That’s a pretty big accusation without having all the facts. Maybe she was advised to use a surrogate because of her age.

      • Mimi says:

        Sofia didn’t want to get pregnant, that why they used surrogate. It’s In legal documents.

      • Anne says:

        @ Allie

        Why is it a big accusation? It’s perfectly fine if a woman doesn’t want to gestate a child. It’s a perfectly valid choice. There should be no judgement attached to that. If she wants to have someone else gestate her child, then as long as all parties involved are consenting adults, then who cares why?

    • Apalapa says:

      You wrote Sofia and Joe but Joe is her current husband not Nick, who was her fiance for years.

      I don’t believe Nick has any fertility issues, but I could be wrong..

      • Delilah says:

        Thanks for the correction. I meant Nick Loeb not Joe in my speculation of who had the fertility issues if any at all.

    • KBB says:

      Sofia has alleged that Nick has paid for multiple abortions for previous girlfriends, so I think it was just an age issue with her. She would have been just over 40 when they made the embryos.

      • Delilah says:

        Omg😮 that answers the question: who of the two—Sofía or Nick—had fertility issues. Because as we all know, age is more of a factor for women than men albeit the quality of sperm like that of eggs declines with age as well. This supports the position Nick is compelled to maintain a connection to Sofía which is non-reciprocal by any means necessary. Gross.

  19. HelloSunshine says:

    He’s using the courts to continue to abuse her, it’s that simple. Any lawyers on here that know if and when the courts will say, “you’re abusing the system to harass somebody?”

    • Apalapa says:

      Sadly it probably will never happen that the courts would see his legal cases as abuse.

      Not to mention two other things:
      1) wouldn’t put it past him to have threatened Sofia, her child or other family she has if she comes out about his abuse.
      2) after all she has been through with this ahole, I am sure Sofia wants to banish him from her life, not go to court to testify about how she was abused. It takes a lot out of you.

    • ORIGINAL T.C. says:

      The courts won’t ever dismiss it due to the anti-choice lobby. They are keeping this lawsuit alive for him.

      Sophia would lose all her endorsements if she tries to bring him down. She is stuck for life or until women take over this country.

      • Anna says:

        Why would she lose all her endorsements if she tries to bring him down?

      • KBB says:

        I’ve never heard anyone take his side in the issue. I think even most pro-lifers see him for what he is – an abusive jerk. Plus he’s paid for abortions, so he’s not exactly a beacon of the pro-life movement. I can’t see her losing endorsements over anything that has to do with him.

  20. launicaangelina says:

    Gross Point Blank is one of my favorite movies and one of my favorite scenes is when Minnie Driver’s character calls John Cusack’s character “A fucking psycho”. It’s the casual delivery that cracks me up. Anyway, every time this guy pops up, I see Minnie Driver saying that.

  21. Starkiller says:

    He named embryos? This whole story is beyond sick, creepy, and disturbing. This has absolutely nothing to do with “right to live” and everything to do with his desperation to cling to the one shred of control he has left over her.

  22. Cee says:

    He’s punishing her, plain and simple. She definitely dodged a bullet with him. Unfortunately, he’s dead weight and will keep trying to be a part of her life in any way, shape or form.

  23. KBeth says:

    He is a pathetic nutjob.

  24. Sparkly says:

    This guy is demented. Naming them is an especially gross move, and I hope he didn’t spitefully pick her favorite names that she wanted to name actual children when she had them. I feel so sorry for her.

  25. adastraperaspera says:

    He is doing it to control her and keep her in relationship with him through the children. The anti-choice crazies he’s working with are looking for a big publicity win for their twisted cause. It’s sick, but it does show very clearly how technology is outpacing the law.

  26. LittlefishMom says:

    I never use the word hate but I hate this man. He is evil personified. What a piece of sh*t. Dude moooooove on.

  27. Lala says:

    If I were Sofia…If I could…I would use a surrogate to have a baby…WITH MY HUSBAND…and send him a present saying…”You mad? Put this cape on…now you can be SUPER MAD!!!”

    • Anne says:

      Lol. That’s an extra super awesome burn. But that might actually play against her in court by establishing intent. A lawyer could argue that she’s not consenting to the use of the embryos purely out of spite and not out of legitimate objections.

      • Anna says:

        So basically by continuing to file lawsuits, even if they get thrown out by every court, he is also stopping her from being able to pursue a family with Joe.

        How f-ing awful on every level. And she is a sweet Cancerian (we are the “mothers” of the zodiac, cardinal water) so my heart just aches for her with this kind of horror. Hopefully she can find mental and spiritual peace and allow her lawyers to handle the majority of this so she doesn’t have to feel as if there is a shadow and disaster ready to fall on her at any moment.

  28. Frosty says:

    I consider this abuse and harassment of an ex – it is #Metoo adjacent.

  29. HeyThere! says:

    He is a creep and making himself single for life doing this crap. Who would date him after what he does to his x?! Nope. He’s got issues. Lots of them.

  30. Jess says:

    This asshole is tying up precious time in the court system that’s already overwhelmed so he can continue to feel power over a woman who had the nerve to leave him. He makes my blood boil and why any lawyer represents him is beyond me, I understand it’s a paycheck but come ON! They signed a binding contract and that should be that, move the f on dude. If he wants children that bad go find a nice woman and do it that way, or hire a surrogate and implant different eggs, anything but this. This is borderline stalking/obsession at this point, it’s sickening that he’s been able to take it this far for this long. It’s abuse!

    • Dink says:

      His family is super rich, his uncle is a billionaire Edgar Bronfman. He is clearly arrogant with entitlement complex. Sofia was his trophy, embryos as well.

  31. Izzy says:

    At this point he should be found a vexatious litigant and barred from bringing any further action on this mattet. Douche. She done with you, she don’t want you. #boybye

  32. Clara says:

    Seriously, I’m 1 story away from finding the freezer and accidentally dumping those embryos in the gutter myself.

    • Delilah says:

      Clara yes!!!

    • Jess says:

      Yes! I thought about that too, if I worked there those embryos would accidentally get lost. Watching her endure this abuse for years is sickening, it needs to end.

    • Clara says:

      It’s absolutely disgusting. It’s so layered, in ego, in being conservative, in being a privileged white male, in being sexist.

  33. JRenee says:

    This guy is obsessed with Sofia. He’s trying to make her life a living hell. He is garbage!

  34. Jess says:

    So I just searched for his social media and he has his pages wide open and covered in pro-life BS. I’m shocked more people like us aren’t blasting him for this behavior, maybe he deletes negative comments. This dude is more twisted than I thought. I legit get a murderer vibe from him, especially if he loses this case and has nothing left to control Sofía.

  35. Nell Graham says:

    I have one of her perfumes I love, her original, Sofia. I’m totally going to buy her others just as a token of support for her. My $0.00000000000000001 cent for her in this fight. What a horrible man.