Emma Stone in Louis Vuitton trousers at the SAG Awards: cute or nah?

The 25th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards

Emma Stone seems to be enjoying her awards season – she hasn’t won anything, and she hasn’t gone into any awards show as the favorite for her role in The Favourite. That has given her the freedom to show up at events, promote her Louis Vuitton contract and just have fun. I really disliked this LV look when I first saw it, but it’s actually grown on me overnight. There was so much fuggery at the SAG Awards, seeing Emma in a great pair of trousers and a really weird blouse is almost refreshing. I still maintain that she needs some new hair people though?

SAG Awards 2019 Arrivals

Rachel Weisz (nominated for The Favourite) kept it low-key in this Givenchy. It wasn’t my favorite look or the best look, but she looks amazing.

The 25th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards

You guys, I love Sandra Oh and I think she’s incredibly talented, and I love that she’s winning so much stuff for Killing Eve. But I’ll be the one to say it: she needs new people. I cannot believe her stylists let her walk on red carpets looking like this. The hair was a disaster, and this Jenny Packham gown was not good.

The 25th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards - Press Room

SAG Awards 2019 Press Room

Catherine Zeta Jones was Michael Douglas’s plus-one, because he was nominated for a SAG. He presented too, with Glenn Close, in what was a cute little Fatal Attraction throwback. Catherine has been pretty low-key during this awards season, right? And her style has been particularly dated – this Zuhair Murad gown would have looked at home at the Vanity Fair Oscar party in 1993.

The 25th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

28 Responses to “Emma Stone in Louis Vuitton trousers at the SAG Awards: cute or nah?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tanguerita says:

    I don’t mind Sandra’s dress (plus, she aced all three looks at Golden Globes, so I wouldn’t fire her stylist in a hurry), but the hair is an unmitigated disaster. Who on earth though that bangs would be a good idea on her?

    • Rosie says:

      I know I love it apart from her hair.

      • L84Tea says:

        I had those exact weird, poofy bangs that I would wear with the rest of my hair pulled back in a ponytail when I was in the 5th grade in 1989-1990. They looked terrible then too.

    • Becks1 says:

      Ditto. I cant even decide if I like the dress or not (maybe?) because the hair is so bad.

    • Jo says:

      I had bangs like this in 1984 — they were terrible then, and they’re just as bad now. The dress is nice though!

    • SK says:

      I actually LOVE this dress on Sandra!! Absolutely gorgeous!! Classic but interesting. Her hair is an unmitigated disaster though. It looks like a dodgy topknot when you don’t want to wash your hair in the shower.

      I have to admit, I loved Killing Eve and Sandra is a favourite actor of mine (so much intelligence and charisma!) but for me the standout in the show was Jodie Comer. I know it’s the more “obvious” role and subtler play is often overlooked; but I found that the Eve character was sometimes a bit uneven (script issues as opposed to acting issues) and Villanelle was just mesmerising. The role could easily have been hammed up or overplayed but it wasn’t. I certainly don’t see Sandra as being the superior actress of the two in that particular show. That said, Sandra has been robbed of the same opportunities a white actress of her proven abilities would have had and has barely had any decent roles between GA and now, so I don’t begrudge her this shining moment at all!! I hope this is a springboard for many more fantastic, meaty roles for her!

      Also: Catherine’s dress may be a bit boring or dated but she looks bloody amazing in it and it’s a win for me!

  2. Cindy says:

    I like Emma’s look also. It’s weird, because I do think it’s ugly, but it somehow works on her. And I like her hair too.

    I wasn’t a fan of Emma in The Favorite. I think Emma’s a good actress, but not good enough for all the nominations and wins she’s accumulated at her young age. And idk if it’s because I knew beforehand she is American, but I just couldn’t believe her accent in The Favorite for a minute. I got the impression she was trying too hard? I don’t understand why they just didn’t get another British actress. It’s the UK, there’s plenty of famous actresses to choose from.

    • S says:

      I thought that same thing, like, Emma’s shirt is really ugly, but the look also kind of works for her?

    • Becks1 says:

      I agree across the board. I like Emma’s look – and I usually am meh on her outfits for appearances like this. My overall quibble with her style is that I think she wears a lot of gold and ivory, that I think washes her out. I think this blouse in a different color (maybe silver?) would have looked significantly better.

      And yeah, I like her as an actress – she’s fine – but I don’t get the hype over her.

    • NotSoSocialButterfly says:

      I think it would have been so much better with a cropped pencil trouser a la the Duchess of Sussex. The leg here is too voluminous and overwhelms her small self.

      • Cindy says:

        Now that you point it out I agree the leg area looks weird, especially around the crotch. But that odd shirt fits her so well, I didn’t even notice.

    • Stubbylove says:

      I liked Emma’s look right away. The pants are perfect, the shirt is gorgeous and I always love her in red hair with a red lip.
      Rachel’s dress and style is beautiful – fantastic.
      Agree Catherine’s dress is dated, but DAMN, if you’re her age and have that body, wear whatever the f*ck you want and show it off.
      I would like Sandra’s dress without the sash with just the simple belt. Her hairstylist must hate her.

  3. Lucy2 says:

    I actually like Sandra’s dress, except for the piece on the shoulder, but agree her hair is not good. She has amazing hair too, what a shame.

  4. grabbyhands says:

    I’m not a fan of the asymmetrical looks, so none of these are really doing it for me. Sandra’s gown is a gorgeous color though. Shame about her hair though.

  5. Lisa says:

    I didn’t mind Sandra’s dress everything else was a disaster. Emma pulled off the look.

  6. SparkP says:

    I’m sad that Sandra Oh got eyelid surgery, since she was pretty outspoken about it before. She looks great no matter what (minus this bangs disaster), but I imagine it must’ve been a struggle for her to finally go under the knife.

  7. Rosie says:

    Last photo looks like a still from the Adams family.

  8. minx says:

    Sandra’s hair is so, so unflattering.😟
    Catherine ZJ still has a great body but I don’t need to see all that.

  9. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    Definitely a meh page lol.

  10. Esmom says:

    Emma looks pretty good, definitely better than her last red carpet outing.

    As for Sandra, Oh. Not the dress so much, but her hair! Yikes.

  11. Melania says:

    Emma Stone style is so tragic. Awful.

  12. Jamielle says:

    Catherine Zeta-Jones’ face! That mug’s pulled tighter than the vag Goop wants.

  13. Diamond Rottweiler says:

    I believe that at any given moment there’s a style in fashion that says “Yes, this is unflattering to my figure, but I still look a hundred times better in it than any mere mortal would, so you KNOW I have a killer fashion bod under this fug.” Emma’s 80s post partum trousers fall into this category. The last super aggressive version of this phenomenon I remember was the hard box pleat micro mini. I look forward to this going away as I lived through it the first time and it was depressing enough then. I hope it takes the male nipple harness with it.

  14. Ravensduaghter says:

    I can’t really see the effects on CZJ’s face so well in the pic, but her body looks great. I’m about to turn 55, so my destiny is to check out the older actresses and see how they are faring. She is faring quite well.

    • K says:

      Catherine Zeta Jones is not aging well, she was born in 1969, whereas Rachel Weisz is a year younger, born in 1970. I also don’t believe Catherine is older than her stated age either, she was in the public eye as a young child performing and Birthdate is public record over in her country. Her aging is due to smoking and tanning and stress.