Kim & Kourtney Kardashian wore black Versace to the amfAR gala: cute or nope?

AmfAR New York Gala 2019

Last night was a big amfAR gala in New York, ahead of Fashion Week. I remember when amfAR galas far and wide (in New York, Cannes, wherever) would be the creme de la creme, the top A-list celebrities and models, all raising money for AIDS treatment and research. These days, we get Heidi Klum and some Kardashians. That’s not completely fair – there was an okay model turnout, it’s just that the current era of models is kind of uninspiring?

Anyway, the Kardashians. Kourtney and Kim stepped out for the amfAR gala and thank God, because maybe they’ll draw some attention to a worthy event. Both women wore black Versace frocks, and Kim’s Versace is particularly… gross and tacky. Sorry. I’m also fascinated by whatever is happening on Kim’s feet? In several photos, I thought she was barefoot, but no – she’s wearing heels with very clear straps. It’s weird.

AmfAR New York Gala 2019

Other notable attendees: Bar Refaeli, Chanel Iman and her date Sterling Shepard and Heidi Klum.

AmfAR New York Gala 2019

AmfAR New York Gala 2019

AmfAR New York Gala 2019

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

59 Responses to “Kim & Kourtney Kardashian wore black Versace to the amfAR gala: cute or nope?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Ctgirl says:

    So tacky. Heidi Klum should be an honorary Kardashian based on her awful sartorial choices.

    • NotHeidisGirl says:

      My thoughts exactly!

    • Kitten says:

      I don’t know why she continues to do this. She’s a stunning woman with great breasts. If she wants to show them off, that’s her prerogative but SURELY there is a better way to do that this hideous, ill-fitting dress?

      • geekychick says:

        I…..(hangs head in shame), I kinda think she maybe did something with them. A fw years ago they weren’t so prominent and so high, and she didn’t (or maybe I don’t remember?) push them on us so often. IDK.

    • SarahLee says:

      Precisely. I thought “I wonder if Heidi’s boobs and Kim’s boobs had a fight?”

    • Deedee says:

      So true. She always goes for trashy—shiny, short, and skin exposed

    • velourazure says:

      Every time I see these two next to each other I chuckle that we’re supposed to believe that Khloe is also Robert Kardashian’s daughter.

  2. Lily says:

    I’m 100% certain Kim wore that exact same dress, hair and makeup look last year, Kourtney?

  3. Sara says:

    I always thought Kim’s best features were her feet. Very elegant feet.

    I won’t comment on the dress.

    • Slowsnow says:

      IS this shade? If it isn’t it should be. Saying this about Kim’s only body part that hasn’t been enhanced or had plastic surgery is genius.

    • Deedee says:

      She’s got some hammer toes, going on, no?

    • Steff says:

      @Sara You gave me flashbacks to when she was first pregnant and stuffed her swollen feet into see through heels. If there was one moment that encapsulated the Kardashian style, it was that. Uncomfortable. Unnecessary. Tacky.

  4. grabbyhands says:

    They both look ghoulish and tacky, and Kim’s new boobs look like they’re trying to make a break for it.

    • Char says:

      I’ll NEVER understand how Kim works out so hard to only wear clothes that make her look so bad. Not only the dress is vulgar (which, honestly, is what they aim for), but the cut doesn’t do anything for her body, it just makes it boxy. And the hair, omg, it’s plain ugly.

      • Kitten says:

        “Kim works out so hard”?

        Are we considering the Brazilian butt lift and fat transfers workouts now?

      • Erinn says:

        LOL Kitten.

        I think she probably works out at least somewhat hard … but she strikes me as a cardio to make up for the beignets type of gal (which I completely understand). Plus I suppose Lucifer’s home girl doesn’t want her investment… I mean daughter… looking chubby. Now she’s absolutely also bought half of her body – but she’s also made some bad impulse buys by the looks.

      • Deedee says:

        And short. She really looks short in this picture.

      • Char says:

        @Kitten How hard you have to work out to be able to carry those implants and the hair? In heels?

  5. Ula says:

    She looks really boxy, did she pick her outfit while blindfolded?

    • Heather says:

      Isn’t that how she picks out all her outfits?

    • Deedee says:

      Kanye. Same difference.

    • minx says:

      It’s a terrible dress for her figure and frame. Makes her look incredibly dumpy.

    • geekychick says:

      I was just thinking about that. I think black isn’t a great choice for her, particularly with that dress-it hides her waist to hip ration, at least with her posing like this and just makes her look boxy.
      Kourtney looks fine and here, she is living example of
      “done right” vs Kim’s “holy mother of god, too much of anything usually isn’t a good thing”

  6. BaeBae says:

    As an FYI, Sterling Shepard is Chanel Iman’s husband, not just a date.

    The Kardash sisters literally always look the same to me, there’s no variation in styling.

  7. RBC says:

    Kim got a bit of a tune up on her face(lips and nose) to go with her new boobs. Also Kourtney looks different, her eyebrows seem higher

  8. prissa says:

    I like Kourtney’s dress better than Kim’s. Kim just looks gaudy and vulgar. They both look greasy, like they’ve been wearing that same make up for a week straight. So tired of them.

  9. CharliePenn says:

    Kim’s whole look is STRUGGLING. The dress makes her look wide as hell. She has such a great bod, plastic or not… this dress should be burned for what it does to her bod.
    Her hair is not working with this at all, it’s just contributing to the overall boxy mess.

    I like the feet… it’s something different without being ridiculous. Actually the feet and the hair are a look on their own… she needs a dress to go with that long hair shoeless vibe. I would like to see her try a look like that, kind of hippie and earthy. But this is just… no.

  10. Tw says:

    The kardashians always wear clear plastic stripper heels. I’ll never understand it.

  11. PhillyGal says:

    Kim and Heidi seem obsessed with their boobs, and want everyone to look at them. Tacky, tacky.

  12. Snazzy says:

    I don’t understand Kim’s dress

    • Loopy says:

      To me it looks like LIz Hurleys famous dress without the pins.

      • Good GRrrrrl says:

        I’m always thinking it was “event sent” that didn’t fit and couldn’t be altered. Like a mistake they have to pull off? Also didn’t a housewife design the smashed boob bodice and rolled around drunk in her creation? Now it’s an on purpose thing, or event sent mistake? Not sure it just looks painful tho

    • Lightpurple says:

      I think it is on backwards

  13. Louise says:

    Are those Kim’s real boobs? mine don’t have “definition” like that!

    • PhillyGal says:

      Louise – Of course not!

    • Erinn says:

      Girl, I’m only 28 and I can’t think of any time in my life that mine ever looked like hers haha. Though she’s talked about using gaff tape to support them in dresses and stuff, so I’m sure it’s the combination of that, and a lot of surgery.

  14. manda says:

    I thought kim was wearing like stick-on soles or like, foot pasties or something (and no, I don’t think those are actual things that exist but maybe. she wears a lot of things I wouldn’t have thought to exist)

  15. Dee says:

    You should’ve posted a picture of Karen Mulder in that dress from the 90s; that’s how it should be worn. Kim makes everything look cheap and tacky, though. I think that’s her goal though.

  16. NotHeidisGirl says:

    Heidi’s facial expression in this picture ist creepy AF! #sorrynotsorry

  17. Dorothy says:

    Haha I’m looking looks STUPID while her “boring to look at sister” looks STUNNA. Here for it. Kimmy is such an orange turd licker never forget she loves the Drumpfs #Kumplishit

  18. barbwire says:

    i thought they were butt nekkid (standard issue clothing for them), and these dresses were badly photoshopped on them to preserve our eyes…

  19. smcollins says:

    That family is the living embodiment of “money doesn’t buy class.”

  20. Spikey says:

    I’m calling it: Heidi got herself a new pair of boobs.

  21. Tiffany says:

    Kourtney messing with her face is inexplicable. Really. Why.

    • Polly says:

      Kourtney’s face looks weird and lopsided in all the photos I’ve seen from this event, like she’s jutting her jaw out to the side.

  22. Ashley says:

    I’m so over the almost-showing-your-entire-boob dress. 🙄🙄

    • Pandy says:

      Yes. And let’s add “slit to the crotch or sheer showing underwear” to the list of dress styles I’m over. Tacky and vulgar.

      I do feel that they are in their downward spiral of fame now … thank God.

  23. BeanieBean says:

    Is that vintage Versace? Because Kim’s dress looks the same as the one Cindy Crawford wore when she went to the Oscars with her then-husband, Richard Gere, only her dress was red. As I remember, Cindy said she told the designer she wanted to look like Jessica Rabbit (or she wanted a Jessica Rabbit dress). The dress just fits Kim differently than Cindy, for obvious reasons.

  24. Oliviajoy1995 says:

    That dress looks awful on Kim. It does nothing for her. And her hair looks greasey. Kourtney looks good. Why isn’t Kim wearing any shoes?

  25. Liima says:

    FYI…that’s Chanel’s husband…just saying

  26. Jessie says:

    It looks like they cut Kourtney’s dress at the same time they cut Kims, just used one piece for each dress. Like puzzle piece necklines.