Duchess Meghan guest-edited the September issue of British Vogue

meghan vogue uk

It’s here! We knew a while ago that the Duchess of Sussex would have a major role in British Vogue’s September issue. The story was that Meghan was approached about appearing on the cover and she turned them down, but suggested that she could guest-edit the September issue. That’s exactly what happened – British Vogue released the preview last night, and the SussexRoyal Instagram released more information too. From British Vogue’s cover summary:

HRH The Duchess of Sussex has guest-edited a landmark issue of British Vogue with editor-in-chief Edward Enninful. Entitled “Forces for Change”, the September 2019 issue highlights a cast of brilliant female changemakers who are set to re-shape society in radical and positive ways. It is the first time a September issue of British Vogue has been co-edited. The cover has been photographed by Peter Lindbergh – his first for the magazine since September 1992 – and features 15 women from the worlds of politics, sport, and the arts, all of whom have made an inspiring impact on modern life. The selection of women was a highly personal process for the Duchess and for Enninful, and the result of a collaboration that began in January of this year.

“These last seven months have been a rewarding process, curating and collaborating with Edward Enninful, British Vogue’s editor-in-chief, to take the year’s most-read fashion issue and steer its focus to the values, causes and people making impact in the world today,” the Duchess said. “Through this lens I hope you’ll feel the strength of the collective in the diverse selection of women chosen for the cover as well as the team of support I called upon within the issue to help bring this to light. I hope readers feel as inspired as I do, by the ‘Forces for Change’ they’ll find within these pages.”

The cover line-up includes New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, who, in a first for the magazine and for Lindbergh, was photographed for the cover in Auckland, New Zealand via video link; the teenaged climate activist Greta Thunberg, lensed by Lindbergh in Sweden, who at 16 is one of the magazine’s youngest ever cover stars; the activist and actor Jane Fonda, who, at 81, is its oldest; and the LGBTQIA+ advocate, actor and producer Laverne Cox, who becomes the first trans person to feature on the cover of British Vogue.

Also on the cover is Adwoa Aboah, the mental health campaigner and model; Adut Akech, the former refugee and model; Ramla Ali, the former refugee and boxer; Sinéad Burke, the diversity advocate and lecturer; Gemma Chan, the campaigner and actor; Salma Hayek Pinault, the women’s rights advocate, actor and producer; Francesca Hayward, the Royal Ballet principal dancer and actress; Jameela Jamil, the body positivity activist and actor; Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, the author; Yara Shahidi, the youth voting activist and actor; and Christy Turlington Burns, the maternal health advocate and model.

The 16th spot on the cover will appear in print as a silver reflective mirror, to show how you, the reader, are part of this extraordinary moment in time – and to encourage you to use your own platform to bring change. The issue also comprises an intimate insight into the Duchess’s world. She introduces Forces for Change in her own words in her guest editor’s letter, and also contributes an interview with the former First Lady Michelle Obama. Other highlights include an interview conducted by her husband, HRH The Duke of Sussex, with the renowned ethologist Dr Jane Goodall.

[From British Vogue]

In his letter from the editor, Edward Enniful wrote: “To have the country’s most influential beacon of change guest edit British Vogue at this time has been an honour, a pleasure and a wonderful surprise,” and that people can see for themselves that Meghan is “willing to wade into more complex and nuanced areas, whether they concern female empowerment, mental health, race or privilege.” As for why Meghan decided not to appear on the cover herself, Enniful notes that Meghan “felt that it would be in some ways a ‘boastful’ thing to do for this particular project. She wanted, instead, to focus on the women she admires.”

In the SussexRoyal Instagram, Meghan writes (because of course she wrote this): “The Duchess chose a diverse selection of women from all walks of life, each driving impact and raising the bar for equality, kindness, justice and open mindedness.” What’s funny and sad is that even with all of this positivity and thoughtfulness, Meghan’s still going to be criticized and smeared a million different ways. I’ve already seen some shady comments from members of the royal-reporter clique but for now, I’m going to leave it. I think Meghan’s right in that if she had been on the cover, the criticism would have been worse, absolutely. But make no mistake: they’re going to climb up her ass about this anyway.

meghan vogue2

Cover & photo courtesy of British Vogue, additional photo courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

241 Responses to “Duchess Meghan guest-edited the September issue of British Vogue”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Sierra says:

    What a lovely diverse group of women and girls.

    She choose well by promoting others from different backgrounds and fighting for different rights.

    • Megan says:

      I love Meghan, but this is an incredibly obvious group of women that we have already read about many times. I wish she had reached out to womens and international development organizations to cover the women who are on the ground doing amazing things. They are the ones who need their profiles elevated.

      • Flying fish says:

        +1

      • Nikki says:

        These women have already been vetted. If she had picked a bunch of unknowns, and the media would have found something in their past and Megan would have gotten the blame for that as well.

        It’s funny that you still found the time to criticize something that she did, instead of just celebrating the cover, or moving on. Very telling.

      • Valiantly Varnished says:

        @Nikki exactly. She truly cant win.

      • Nahema says:

        I love what this issue stands for more than anything and I think she made the right choice by not putting herself on the cover. Originally I thought if she was going to guest edit, she might as well go for it but actually in context, it would have been a boastful thing.

        @Nikki, I don’t think there is anything wrong with constructive criticism, which I think is what @Megan intended. She’s right, that there are a lot of women doing incredibly worthwhile jobs but we never get to hear about them. I also get why they didn’t go with them.

      • Mee says:

        ‘Obvious group’? You know all about Adut Akech and Ramla Ali??? Lol

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Its a great idea and it sends a good message when she didn’t pose for it – she’s saying that their is more to her than her appearance.

      • 90sgirl says:

        P..S. Meghan HAS reached out to women on the ground to do amazing things, with her Cookbook. Many of those women have now started businesses of their own.

        But hey Haters always gonna find faux excuses to hate.

        Meghan works while haters get twisted and filled bitterness .

        Well done Meghan. Duchess.

      • Mac says:

        I didn’t realize we needed to have blind loyalty to Meghan. Jane Fonda has been out front with her activism for 60 years. An activist from the US border would have been a better choice IMHO.

      • notasugarhere says:

        An activist from the US border would be seen as an anti-Trump political choice.

      • DS9 says:

        Jane Fonda may be well known but there’s a pervasive myth regarding her involvement in Vietnam that she can’t shake.

        Featuring her and her work is a valuable and worthwhile pursuit and is not something we should dismiss as well known.

      • Mtec says:

        @Megan
        This issue was guest edited by Meghan, so from HER perspective these are the people SHE wanted to highlight, she wasn’t tasked to speak about every single person ever creating change, it literally says it’s the people that inspire HER. If you want to read about others she didn’t include in the issue, you are welcome to seek those stories yourself, but she is not obligated to look for people you deem less “obvious.” I personally don’t know many of the people mentioned here and I’m really interested in reading about them.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I disagree with the critique of her choices. She mixed some well known names with new voices, and I think that is a wise strategy.

    • Ellis says:

      They hate to see this girl win, as if her success takes away from their lives.

      • Nana says:

        How her haters walk around without tripping over their actual bottom lip and escaping from the raining dark cloud that engulfs their heads daily, beats me…

    • 90sgirl says:

      Well done Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. Excellent choices , beautiful reasons for the selection.

      I rofl last night at the haters stumbling, when Buck Palace released the British Vogue Cover info.

      Excellent, well thought out. Beautiful.

      Meghan works, completes tasks. Love her.
      Beautiful ladies, accomplished group. I will be buying this Vogue.

      • bamaborn says:

        90SGIRL…also plan to buy a copy. Live in the states, so might have to jump through a few more hoops.

      • PrincessK says:

        Fantastic! She really is the Duchess of Success. I will get my copy soon too, it will be a sellout and become one of those stand out editions of Vogue.

        So much better than her just smiling on the front cover.

      • Lady Keller says:

        I never buy magazines. Not since I was probably 15. But I want to go out of my way to purchase a copy of this. It’s a small gesture but it feels like it would be a nice little F you to all Meghan’s haters to help make this one of the best selling issues. I’m a Canadian so I dont know how much luck I will have?

      • Some chick says:

        This Vogue is going to sell extremely well, even for September.

        I think the mirror spot is her spot. She gave her spot to YOU.

        I think she’s fooking brilliant and I can hardly wait to see what she does next! Get ’em, Meg!!!

      • PrincessK says:

        Yes, and what’s more is that it is going raise money for her charities and their profile.

      • Nic919 says:

        @ Lady Keller – I think that indigo might sell British Vogue in Canada.

  2. OriginalLala says:

    This is very cool – I wonder how many people will be wringing their hands and gnashing their teeth about her “breaking protocol” and taking on political topics? Daily Fail article about this in 3-2-1…

    • Lanne says:

      There are already a slew of DM articles. The usual. yawn.

      • OriginalLala says:

        they are so predictable…

      • Deb says:

        Indeed!!! That jan moir really seems to have it in for Meghan – she really wrote up a hatchet piece and did not mince words. The other 2 Katie Nichols & Rebecca English seem to be more passive aggressive & just bait the rabid commenters I find…

    • Beli says:

      They’ve had it front and centre all morning and racking up the thousands of comments, as per usual.

      Their readers genuinely terrify me at this point.

      • Oh No says:

        I saw the vitriol last night on Twitter. Like, I couldn’t imagine being so damn miserable and pathetic…

        They hate to see this girl win, as if her success takes away from their lives.

        …if I had their tragic lives, it’d probably hurt me too.

      • Megan says:

        The Daily Fail makes its money by agitating racists. As for the twitter trolls, I would not be at all surprised if 90% of them are Russian bots design to feed the hyper partisanship in the UK.

      • JJ says:

        @Oh No, loved your comment about someone else’s success not diminishing yours. So true. Wish Pierce Morgan would read it. He is definitely a bitter, pathetic human.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        @Meghan, You are 100% correct except I would have stated “agitating racists and BREXITERS”. They maybe the same people but being a Yank I do not really know.

        The Daily Fail is about nothing except selling news papers and click-bait for dollar$ & pound$.

      • Still_Sarah says:

        I can’t see any reason why the Duchess of Sussex would even read the British press at this point. I mean really, why? They are a bunch of strangers who hate her. I would just turn the whole thing off and go about my business.

      • himmiefan says:

        Recently, I read a study that the majority of anti-Meghan remarks across the Internet are from just 20 troll accounts.

      • notasugarhere says:

        And the majority of those trolls were proven to be from outside the UK and Commonwealth.

    • Nic919 says:

      Prince Charles guest edited an edition of Town and Country so no protocol broken here.

      • Nic919 says:

        Oops it was Country Life. Anyway the haters, seem to have forgotten all history in order to complain.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Sure, and Kate guest-edited some online something or other (HuffPo?). Doesn’t matter. It’s a good way to bring attention or more attention to the causes each woman espouses. It’s all for the better.
        Plus, I recognize the names of some of the women but not all, so I’ll enjoy learning about them.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      They are mostly in hysterics because she didn’t pick The Queen. Am sure TQ doesn’t GAF.

      Unlike another Duchess, she went to Vogue’s HQ spending time with the team there, rather than making them all come to her and then pose with them for less than 45mins before going off shopping down Kings Road later that afternoon.

  3. Sofia says:

    I’m very excited to read this. I don’t really like spending money on magazines because hello internet but I will do my best to get my hands on this.

    And you’re right Kaiser in that there’s as usual criticism. The Daily Fail has 5 or so articles alone on this. But they’re only bitter because they didn’t get the scoop which means their royal sources are shit (like people have said) and this went on for more than half a year and none of their royal sources they boast about told them.

    They said she would be on the cover, write about her charities and guest edit. They were right on one but so painfully wrong about the others.

    • Beli says:

      I peeked at the DM.

      EIGHT articles.

    • M says:

      They are too hateful and petty to understand that they are actually helping Meghan to become more famous and causing a lot of people to defend and support her. I predict this issue of British Vogue will sell an insane amount of copies. I know I’ll be purchasing one as soon as I can find it.

  4. Jessica says:

    This is wonderful and yes, there have already been unhinged, vicious, spiteful articles on The Sun and The Mail. I will be buying the issue and feasting on their bitter tears.

  5. Beli says:

    She worked on this for seven months, apparently, and I really like the message here. And these are some fantastic women to spotlight. She knew that she’d catch heat whatever, but she’s been very much behind the scenes, no cover, not even a photoshoot.

    And yes, some people have been snide about it (Dan Wooton had a big rant in a move that shocked absolutely nobody), but there are also a lot of journalists clapping back and supporting her for it. The rock is being lifted and I’m hopeful that the tides will turn for her. She’s doing well so far, even without the huge amount of venom being flung her way.

    Also Meghan met Sinead Burke and Jacinda Ardern on her royal tours with Harry and I love that she’s kept in touch and is clearly in good terms with them!

    • Kittycat says:

      Dan is crazy

      • 90sgirl says:

        IMO It seem to ramp up with him, after he was one of the few who hinted at the William alleged up to Hijinks in a Rose garden story months back. Was he called on the carpet for writing about Willie?
        He has since then pointed his pen of hate strictly at Meghan.
        I think he was told, get with the program.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Tanna’s going after Meghan too. Trying to get back on the Middleton payroll?

  6. Maddy says:

    Daily Mail front page:
    1)B*tching about not including The Queen.
    2)Megan is all about Me, Myself and Megan

    She just can’t win with them. It’s sad and infuriating.

    • Sofia says:

      How on earth is the Queen a “trailblazer”? Isn’t the reason why people like her is because she’s traditional and never gives her opinion on anything?

      • chunkyla says:

        Didn’t the Queen surprise the hell out of the King of Saudi Arabia by jumping in to the driver’s seat and driving him around her estate? I think she deserves to be on the cover for that badass, girl power move alone LMAO.

      • whitecat says:

        It’s not like the King of Saudi Arabia would have done anything. SA needs UK more than UK needs SA. The Queen never exactly did anything to support SA women, so no.

      • Erinn says:

        She was also commissioned as an honorary second subaltern in the ATS — basically the equivalent of a second lieutenant and a letter was sent from the King stating that no special treatment should be made for her. She was the first woman in the royal family to have an active full time member of the women’s service.

        Badass indeed.

      • Nic919 says:

        While she may have had a few moments of individual flair, the Queen literally represents the Crown, which is the institution that needs changing so unless she’s prepared to turn the UK and remaining constitutional monarchies into republics, she is the image of status quo.

    • olive says:

      i don’t know how they can claim meghan is all about herself when she didn’t even put herself on the cover of Vogue like a certain other duchess did when she had the chance in 2016. at least meghan is featuring other women.

  7. Nanea says:

    Cue the Duchess wars in the Yellow Press in 3, 2, 1… again. Meghan calls appearing on the cover boastful, according to Enninful, meanwhile Katie Keen’s June 2016 cover had very low sales, despite it being at the same time the issue that celebrated 100 years of Vogue.

    • Startup Spouse says:

      Wonder about the reaction – from U.K. media and KP – when this issue’s sales blow Kate’s issue’s sales out of the water? How will they spin that?

    • TeamAwesome says:

      I think declaring yourself a force for change alongside PM Arden is different than that Norfolk safari mash up Late and her eyebrows did. (Kate auto corrected to Late. Point taken, phone.)

      • Valiantly Varnished says:

        Except she didn’t declare herself a “force for change”. The Editor of the magazine did.

      • TeamAwesome says:

        Right. I’m saying I can see how Meghan would have viewed putting herself on the cover as boasting, saying that she’s a force for change, inviting more she thinks so much of herself headlines. Which happened anyway. She wasn’t calling out the act of being on a magazine cover, something she and other Royals have already done, but it has been spun that way.

    • Lexa says:

      I can probably tell you the spin because I agree with it: Kate’s cover has the second-highest sales for the the year after its September issue. A lot of people (myself included!) only buy the September issue of Vogue, so a better comparison would be to look at the sales of past British Vogue September issues.

      • 90sgirl says:

        Kate’s sales were not that good. They didn’t bring expected numbers.
        Also the editor quit after that.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Also they put Katie Keen’s cover in the 100 Years Vogue exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery that year as well – tried to make it the big selling point. It was a popular exhibition (not because of that bland cover shot) but because they delved into the archives to showcase some iconic shots. The Vogue archives are a closely guarded vault.

  8. Kittycat says:

    Charles, Harry and Kate all guest-edited but people are losing their minds over Meghan doing this.

    Its hilariously sad.

  9. HB says:

    Remind me, what was the magazine that Kate guest edited, where she left after 30 mins to get her hair done? I’ve already seen a million comments about how Kate would never ever ever do this and it’s a major protocol violation and fame-whoring.

    • TeamAwesome says:

      It was The Huffington Post, online.

      • Chrissy says:

        And didn’t they have the whole thing set-up at Kensington Palace? So Huff Post went out of the your way to oblige her in her own house, she showed up for the obligatory 15 mins, so it would count as an engagement, and then she ducked out to get her hair done. Smh

      • notasugarhere says:

        Yes and after that, the US branch of HuffPost stopped publishing pap photos of their kids. Kate didn’t do that 20 minutes of “guest editing” for a good cause. It was done to bribe HP to stop publishing legally taken photos that W&K didn’t want published.

    • Beli says:

      The Huffington Post.

      Oh and Harry guest edited the BBC’s Today programme (remember the interview with Barack Obama?)

      And Charles has edited Country Life magazine TWICE.

    • aquarius64 says:

      BP made the announcement so the Palace signed off on this project. Glad to see more people are defending the duchess.

    • Ina says:

      “Kate would never ever ever do this” because she doesn’t have a clue on how to do it in the first place. She has neither the gravitas nor credibility for this type of work.

  10. tw says:

    I’m so happy to see Christy Turlington Burns recognized for her work with Every Mother Counts!

  11. Abby says:

    I really love this. I hope to buy it, even in America. Well done Meghan!

    I don’t even want to see the negative press about it.

  12. Danielle says:

    I think the cover looks great! I’m so happy to see Irish gal Sinead Burke featured!

    The commentary around Meghan on The Mail is honestly deranged and quite frightening at this point.

    • Lindsnowork says:

      The cover is almost identical to a book called “The Game Changers” that came out in 2016, MM is featured on it and submitted an essay.

      • Sofia says:

        And?

        Having a collage in black and white is nothing new nor innovative.

        And technically Gossip Girl did it “first” in 2012 with their Season 6 DVD cover. Should the CW throw a tantrum about that?

      • Danielle says:

        I mean, how else are you supposed to display 16 pictures on a cover? I don’t really get that complaint.

      • DD says:

        Very true

      • Olenna says:

        What is your point, Lindsnowork? I hope it’s not to show us how familiar you are with major magazines like Time or Life that have used that technique to highlight more than one individual for their cover stories.

      • Moneypenny says:

        @Sofia LOL! DM is going to reach out to the CW and rile them up 🙂

      • Agenbiter says:

        Odd – The Game Changers book cover isn’t even black and white from what I can see https://bit.ly/2Ms4AXF

        This couldn’t be a manufactured controversy from the Daily Liar, could it??

      • Ariadne says:

        I work in graphic design and in no way was this collage idea something that ‘The Game Changers’ originated – it’s a fairly standard solution to the problem of how to display a number of portraits and has been done a number of times before; people claiming this is plagiarism have no idea what plagiarism actually is.

        Also, I don’t think the guest editor is responsible entirely for cover design so ‘blaming’ Meghan for this is ridiculous.

  13. Monicack says:

    Even the media can’t un-landmark this. Buying seven copies for all the women in my immediate family.

  14. ds says:

    i just went to see cause I saw the coments here saying the Fail was on it and my lord are they desperate. Apperently there’s a backlash, and I just don’t know why anyone would say bad things about a cool cover. People there need to get a life. Also that behind the scene video is beautiful.

    • Desdemona says:

      You should see the comments on BBC One.. So much hatred…

      • ds says:

        People are so easy to comment with negativity. And assuming things. I will never understand that part of it – assuming you know someone, analyzing them instead of getting involved with the theme and if you have to be critical at least have something to say other than just being vile. It’s so sad.

      • Tina says:

        BBC1 is a television channel. Which programme, and who made the comments?

      • Desdemona says:

        @Tina, it’son Facebook page of BBC1

      • Tina says:

        It looks like a pretty typical mix to me. The top “most relevant” (negative) comment is from a Diana Marston, who is from…Georgia. Some comments are positive, some are negative, and some reflect the most common British attitude towards the royals, which is, “who cares?”

      • Desdemona says:

        Tina, you’re right…they got better, since I read it at first…some people started refuting the mean ones.. It’s balanced… Which is good…

  15. Seraphina says:

    I can’t wait to get my hands on an issue. Even in the digital age, this is one I want. This project shows forethought and reflection. And I thought, how profound to have a space that reflects the woman or person holding the issue. Because we all can do something to change this world for the better. Even it’s in our little community. Every little bit helps. And I believe that’s how Meghan thinks. And I applaud the fact that we have a woman with the global stage at her feet who does want to make a difference. Well done To Meghan. Let the haters hate Megs, they will always want to tear you down because your light casts shadows on them.

    • Vv says:

      To be honest,the mirror gimmick (that is quite condescending in my opinion,but that’s just me) was already done by Time magazine for their Person of the Year issue,and was used by Alexandra Shulman ten years ago for British Vogue. And I don’t like the cover execution either. It looks like an Insta post and it’s confusing. I would have preferred a group shot that is more in line with the concept of the issue,or simply multiple covers.

      To be honest,the mirror gimmick (that is quite condescending in my opinion,but that’s just me) was already done by Time magazine for their Person of the Year issue,and was used by Alexandra Shulman ten years ago for British Vogue. And I don’t like the cover execution either. It looks like an Insta post and it’s confusing. I would have preferred a group shot that is more in line with the concept of the issue,or simply multiple covers.

  16. Lisa says:

    So proud of Meghan and I am.not even going to entertain the ridiculous usual suspects.

  17. Loretta says:

    I love the cover, I can’t wait to read the conversation with Michelle Obama

    • IlsaLund says:

      +1. I wonder when she had the opportunity to interview M.O. And no one knew about it in advance. So much for “my palace sources.” 😂

      • Olenna says:

        Maybe during Michelle’s London book tour? I know the haters were complaining that the DoS might have had a private meeting with her.

  18. Mignionette says:

    It was delicious watching Dan Wooton melt down this morning like a rabid lunatic. As if he gives a stuff about what is Royal or not, When the chips are down he is just triggered by the fact that Meghan keeps outsmarting and surprising them and in the process exposing them to be the lying gossipers they are.

    Not one of the RRs had the scoop on this one and that must sting in a huge way. They cannot even feed their rabid readers at the DM with any decent Royal Gossip these days.

    I am guessing the press release happened today before the Magazine officially goes to print and secrets are spilled. I also suspect Vogue will advance feature this piece on their website to stop the RRs building their own agenda and ruining it for the readership/ fans.

    • notasugarhere says:

      One of the “royal reporters” broke the mandatory blackout on it yesterday, then deleted her post. We’ll see if her publication is removed from the media list after this.

    • Tourmaline says:

      I agree about the meltdowns, but regarding the surprise aspect, wasn’t the fact that Meghan was working on guest editing this issue publicized awhile ago? I am pretty sure there was even an item in Celebitchy talking about it earlier this summer.

      • notasugarhere says:

        It was rumored but not confirmed.

      • Becks1 says:

        Yeah it was just a rumor. Some said she was writing an article for it, some said she was guest editing, some said she was going to be on the cover, some said Wintour wanted her for the US September issue, etc.

  19. TheOriginalMia says:

    I’m so proud of her. She’s been working behind the scenes on this for 7 months. Pregnant, on tour and working/interviewing these girls and women for this issue. Wow! She really has set a high standard for her role in this family and I love it.

    I hope this issue is available in the States. I’d love to have one.

    • Jessica says:

      Any retailer that stocks a wide variety of magazines including international mags and newspapers should have it. Even Barnes & Noble stocked international editions back in the day (not sure if they still do). It will also be available in digital format on Kindle and elsewhere.

    • Becks1 says:

      I saw on twitter that B&N should have it, there is just going to be a bit of lag time between when it is released in the UK and when they get it here in the US.

    • bamaborn says:

      The Original…one commenter stated Barnes and Noble here in the states will have copies. I plan to contact store.

  20. Becks1 says:

    This is amazing. Good for British Vogue for doing something different for the September issue, and good for Meghan for her work here.

    The first few comments I saw on twitter were about how she was such a celebrity, so Hollywood, etc but they were immediately shut down with links to Kate’s Vogue cover, lol.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Many have appeared in the pages of Vogue (Queen, Charles, Margaret, Anne), and others had cover portraits done specifically for/with Vogue with articles (Anne).

    • Tourmaline says:

      Right, Kate sitting in a Norfolk field wearing a hat and a pound of greasepaint on her eyebrows. Unforgettable for all the wrong reasons!

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Hahaha – lets not forget the Jecca Craig ‘country girl’ cosplaying that was going on with the outfit choices. It was a bland cover of a bland subject.

      • Becks1 says:

        Oh her cover and the photos inside were so bad!! They could have been really good. If they didn’t want to go full glam, and wanted to keep the country aesthetic, fine….but they still could have been so much better.

      • Tina says:

        I remember going to the National Portrait Gallery exhibit where that photograph was exhibited, and in the same room was a photo of Prince Charles, also in the country, also for British Vogue. It was such a better photo it was embarrassing.

      • Nic919 says:

        Her face was photoshopped to oblivion in that cover along with the caterpillar brows. She doesn’t resemble herself at all.

  21. Desdemona says:

    It’s so sad to see all the comments against her… People are basicially complaining she want to break Royal Protocol, while keeping her private life.. ~I don’t understant the hatred.

  22. LORENA says:

    Does Meghan look a lot like Gina Rodriguez in this pic? 🤔

  23. Valiantly Varnished says:

    This issue will be amazing but I cant help but be pissed off that she felt she had to turn down the cover because it would be boastful. Diana appeared on the cover of Vogue TWICE (and one time posthumously). Princess Anne appeared on the cover THREE TIMES. Kate also did a Vogue cover. But of course the black woman has to turn down opportunities in case folks think she is getting too uppity for her station. There is always a double standard. And it’s exhausting.
    And yes – Twitter was alight with angry triggered white women asking how much money was Meghan paid and that yes – Meghan is boastful and thinks too highly of herself. But none of them had much to say when I literally posted ALL of the royal women who appeared on the cover.

    • Alexandria says:

      It is exhausting.

      If you’re reading this, I support you, Meghan and team.

    • ADS says:

      I think her reason makes sense in context. Enninful said that Meghan felt it would be a ‘boastful’ thing to do for the project, not that it was a boastful thing in general. With the project being called ‘forces for change’ putting herself on the cover would look like she was giving that accolade to herself. I think she was smart to feature women she admires on the cover in the light of the subject matter. I also reckon she will do a vogue cover in future. She is biding her time though, which is smart.

      • Mignionette says:

        Agreed re biding her time. I think it’s a smart move. It’s very fraught politically at the moment in the UK and Meghan knows that. A few years down the line Vogue et al will be begging her to take the cover.

    • Osgirl says:

      She’s guest editing – which none of the others have done. With that context, putting yourself on the cover could be seen as boastful. Also, Enninful used that word, which Meghan I’m sure wishes he didn’t now because it’s the thing that’s getting traction.

      Anyway, I hope she does do a cover in the future.

    • kerwood says:

      @Valiantly Varnished, you’re so right. Black women ALWAYS have to keep their lights under a bushel so the rest of the world doesn’t feel threatened. What is it about us that scares them so?

    • Blacksred says:

      Or how about Meghan is just going into her second year of marriage and has done more than Kate did by year 4

  24. bread says:

    While the project is well-meaning, the selection of women is a bit boring, a bit too much the usual suspects. But I guess most of them still had to look like they belonged on the cover of Vogue.

    And the mirror idea is very silly and childish to me – like something from a toddler’s first book. Will this issue of Vogue also come with a rubber ring to gnaw at and a piece of wool where you can feel with your own fingers just how soft Mary’s little lamb really is?

    • S says:

      +1 to all of you points.

    • Solidgolddancer says:

      @bread

      Geez…..do you need a hug?

    • Sofia says:

      I mean if you don’t like it that’s fine. There are plenty of royal women vogue covers that are more your taste.

      Meghan could have taken this in many different ways and she chose an option which IMO gives her the “least” amount of backlash. Not that there isn’t any or that it makes her completely immune but it makes sense from Meghan’s perspective.

    • ADS says:

      Actually a lot of people seem particularly impressed and touched by the mirror aspect. Personally I like it, it’s simple yet powerful and inarguable: we all need to try and be the change we want to see in the world.

    • Leyton says:

      I thought the mirror thing was actually very creative.

      As for the selection of women, not everyone there is well known. I could name only maybe 5 so don’t assume we all knew who everyone there is.

      Either way, I thought Meghan did a great job and despite some idiots, a lot of people are applauding her for the clear hard work she put into this.

    • Valiantly Varnished says:

      I think the selection of women is fantastic. Particularly that she chose so many WOC. And I certainly wouldn’t call them the “usual suspects”. I highly doubt most people know who off hand who Adut Akech or Ramla Ali is.

      • Bren says:

        Exactly, I’m familiar with some but not all of the women featured in this September issue.

    • aquarius64 says:

      Geez what a Bitter Betty.

    • kerwood says:

      @Bread Maybe the other duchess will submit an article on botox and hair extensions. Oh and provide instructions on a DIY bum log.

      • Olenna says:

        Ha! What a *keen* idea! It’s obvious the theme and the message of this edition was lost on the OP.

    • M.A.F. says:

      While the cover is not an original idea (I keep thinking yearbook cover), it fits with the purpose of this issue.

  25. one of the Marys says:

    I’m only on Instagram, no twitter, and last evening there were 5000+ comments on Sussex royal, half a dozen of them mine. I did entertain myself a bit replying to some folks but by and large the replies were supportive.

  26. Nev says:

    Go on Duchess!!!

  27. Daisy says:

    I think it was great how involved Meghan was in this and I like the idea BUT this cover is horrible and very weak for a September issue. It’s fashion mag and the British Vogue still is one of the big 4, so the least we should expect was a decent cover. Still, I’m excited to read it because the women are all very inspiring.

    • MA says:

      @Daisy For artistic reasons I would’ve preferred a group photo like a Vanity Fair cover. But then I thought that with some of the figures that could be tricky, like too “glam” or Hollywood for the PM for example.

      • iconoclast59 says:

        It would’ve been near-impossible to get all these women in the same room for a group portrait, due to their diverse, busy schedules. They would’ve had to do extensive Photoshopping to put it all together, and the editing would probably be obvious. Also, this layout puts the emphasis on each woman as an individual, as it should be.

      • MA says:

        @iconoclast59 I agree, it would’ve been near impossible logistically. They even had to do a photoshoot via webcam or something similar for the NZ PM, in a group photo that would’ve looked terrible.

  28. Rogue says:

    Some thoughts:
    1. Impressed that she worked on this for 7 months throughout her pregnancy and most details have been kept quiet. Palace sources have been useless! Also seems like she WAS hands on with this. Edward Enninful said she was involved in all aspects including choosing subject matter and that she worked on it every day for last 2 weeks so nice example of BTS work
    2. Can’t wait to get my copy and esp to read the Michelle Obama interview. Love that her patronage SmartWorks will have a profile and will hopefully find out about other women and organisations I am not familiar with
    3. Not a fan of everyone featured on the cover but seems a good diverse group overall. Quite different from Alexander Shulman’s days but that’s why she now fits nicely writing for the Fail.
    4. Think the Fail thought she WAS going to be on the cover hence Jan Moir’s bitter diatribe. Some are also claiming lefties&anti Trump people have been featured so it’s political. Not that I agree but where were the BRF can’t be involved in politics folks when Prince Andrew was discussing Brexit’s impact on British business the other day?
    5. Can understand why she didn’t appear on the cover of issue she was guest editing celebrating change makers- didn’t think it was shade to Kate or any other BRF who has appeared on cover of Vogue despite what media seem to insinuate
    6. I’ve said before Meghan can’t win with the royal reporting press. People have claimed she’s broken protocol with this Vogue issue even though BP announced this project! Dan W was on TV saying royals don’t guest edit and now claiming it was an idiotic decision. Thankfully alot of journalists are pushing back and pointing to Charles guest editing Country life, Harry with BBC radio and Kate with the Huffington Post. But points to determination by some to paint Meghan as a rule breaker even and provoke outrage about every little things she does despite examples of other BRF members doing the same. Not sure how press relations can improve with such bias

    • Wilma says:

      I don’t think the press relations matter at this point. Meghan is contributing heavily to bringing the monarchy into the 21st century with this and her other work. The Daily Mail is not the audience she’s playing to, nor should it be.

  29. Leyton says:

    I love that Meghan is creative and has a vision she wants to see through. She put a lot of thought and hard work into this and it shows.

    I’ll be buying a few copies to support her!

  30. BluePhoenix says:

    Well she probably also didn’t want to be on the cover because she just had a baby. I think the idea behind this issue is fantastic but let’s not act like that wouldn’t have played into her decision not to feature on the cover this time round. She’s an actor and loves the spotlight and is body conscious.

    • Peg says:

      Hugs going for free, grab one.

    • Olenna says:

      The DoS had no problem showing her face or body in public before or after the pregnancy. Projecting is not a good look, BluePhoenix.

    • notasugarhere says:

      This has been in the works for seven months. If she was as vain as you wish, the photos could have been done a long time ago if that’s what she wanted. Try again.

    • Market Street Minifig says:

      Now if only she loved the spotlight enough to allow you and your swarm of sweethearts to follow her every move…

  31. Anon says:

    I don’t mind she did this or who the ladies she picked for the cover. Vogue is Vogue and usually the September (at least in the US) issue is groundbreaking (make your own definition of that)

    My particular issue is that she seems to have “borrowed” her creative ideas from a 2016 book she was attached too previously. That, to me, is a problematic part, IF it is true. I can see how those book authors might have some complaint here.

    • Valiantly Varnished says:

      A collage pic isn’t unique and doesn’t qualify as “borrowing”. How else would you add 16 women’s photos on a cover??

      • Anon says:

        I didn’t read it as just a collage pic but as “the Duchess of Sussex wrote an essay for ‘The Game Changers’ by Samantha Brett and Steph Adams” which is a published book. I am sure the authors of said published book might see it as infringement or poaching at least.

        I am sure poaching (maybe not the right word I guess) happens all the time and gets “overlooked” so I am sure Duchess Sussex will be fine with her Vogue cover. I much prefer her cookbook project over this though personally

        However, I guess if the authors of the book she wrote the essay for in Australia get a bounce in sales off all this, then they might not complain too much more in the end?! Lol

      • Valiantly Varnished says:

        Well the authors of said book haven’t said a thing. Probably because the covers aren’t actually alike a that alike. This argument is silly and merely a way to diminish Meghan’s work on this issue.
        I say until the ACTUAL authors of the book in question speak out everyone else can go out about their business.

    • MrsBanjo says:

      That style of cover has been done several times over. The authors of that book did not invent it. Go to any book store and you’ll see. It’s entirely possible Meghan thought of that book and realised it’s a simple and effective style for what she needs. She also may not have even remembered that cover specifically, regardless of the fact that she contributed an essay. Either way it doesn’t matter. They don’t have a claim on a long-used photo placement and it did the job it was meant to.

      ETA: I just googled that book. The covers are nothing alike other than a bunch of images of women side by side. Do a Google image search, you’ll see other books with the same style. This argument is ridiculous.

    • HMC says:

      I bet it wasn’t that book at all. My palace source says the duchess is a huge Gossip Girl fan so while binge watching (again) seasons 5 and 6, she looked at the covers and thought wow, I should do this.

      Gossip Girl ended in 2012. The 5th and 6th season DVDs were released 2012 and 2013 respectively.

      • notasugarhere says:

        😉

        I’m sure she stole it from the 1997 children’s book Seedfolks. (sarcasm)

      • Desdemona says:

        Good one nor sugarhere.. good one..

      • Eloise says:

        When I looked at this cover, the first thing that came to my mind was the KISS album cover they did in 1974. I’m just amazed by the criticism, I guess just criticize because Meghan did something tangible. Everything done in this world was first done by someone, this earth is more than 2019 years old, what we all do has all been done by someone before us. And im still yet to read where the DoS is claiming to have originated the idea for this cover. SMH

    • M.A.F. says:

      Go through any books store. No cover is original, they have all been done before. Especially magazine covers. For this particular issue, it works.

  32. Myra says:

    Cue the outrage from the British media and British people

    • Tina says:

      No, there has been no outrage from the British people, lather rinse repeat, don’t you ever get tired of repeating the same nonsense? The hatred comes from the same trolls and bots that it has always come from, some of whom are British but more of whom are American.

      We’re busy. We have to stockpile food so we can eat when Boris’s no-deal Brexit comes in.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Even with decades of Charles promoting local agriculture, still 50 percent of fresh fruit and veg are imported. Boris doesn’t care, he’ll fly it in daily in diplomatic pouches for himself and flout all regulations.

      • Molly says:

        Yet every single media source in the UK has an article about Meghan/Vogue. Who knew the UK media’s target audience was Americans!

      • Tina says:

        It’s British Vogue. Not US Vogue. Vogue started in the UK. We (UK Vogue) had our 100th anniversary the other year. There was an exhibit in the National Portrait Gallery.

  33. MrsBanjo says:

    I love that Omid Scobie subtly called out the other RRs and their bullshit hypocrisy by mentioning all the other times Royals have either been on the cover of or guest edited magazines. The number of people, including in this comments section, trying to find something to criticise is sad and infuriating.

    • Valiantly Varnished says:

      Yes! I CACKLED when I saw that tweet. I got into a Twitter argument with a woman who said that Meghan was being boastful by guest editing. I then pointed out all the other royal women who did Vogue covers. Her reply? That that was okay because they were only on the cover and Meghan was wrong because she guest edited. When I pointed out previous royals who guest edited publications she said “but they highlighted British rural life” lol. Meghan truly cant win with these racist *ssholes. The woman denied this and then called my comments “black rudeness”. But she’s not racist of course. Lol.

      • MrsBanjo says:

        Good lord, the lengths they’ll go to in order to justify their racist bullshit.

      • BeanieBean says:

        ‘Black rudeness’? Didn’t know there were special kinds of rudeness. Geez Louise.

      • Tourmaline says:

        Ugh!
        It’s racism of course- and also that Meghan dares to have a progressive viewpoint on issues (she is not afraid of the word feminist, which drives right wing haters wild) which is coincidentally another something that racist haters and their media mouthpieces like Pier Morgan and Jan Moir hate her for.

      • Becks1 says:

        Omid’s tweet was perfect.

        I LAUGHED though at Country Life’s response, where they said something about wishing her the best of luck as she tried to produce a magazine as wonderful as the one Charles guest edited last year.

        I think it was supposed to be encouraging and supportive, but it came across kind of like “John Adams…….good luck!” like there’s no way Meghan can “top” Charles’ magazine. But I don’t think it was intended that way lol.

      • Desdemona says:

        Vallantly, being white, blond, hazel-eyed I apologize for such idiotic comment (black rudeness)… Not all of us are like that.. Sorry..

  34. Beverly says:

    I liked Megan until she put Jane Fonda in this article…..what Jane did to my husband while he was in Vietnam and the rest of guys in Vietnam is truly despicable. And, please remember that the guys that were in that war was due to a draft situation they did not have a choice. The face of change…BS

    • Lanne says:

      Jane was wrong to go to North Vietnam. She was widely and rightly criticized for it. She has also apologized for it and expressed regret.

    • kerwood says:

      Jane Fonda has REPEATEDLY expressed regret. John Wayne did more to harm soldiers in Vietnam by GLAMORIZING the war.

    • Peg says:

      Jane did not send anyone to Vietnam, sure posing on the TANKS was not the smartest thing to do 50 years ago, and she apologized for it.

    • Nanea says:

      Truly despicable should be reserved for the people who started and then maintained the war for nearly two decades, the presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford and people like the defense secretaries McNamara and Schlesinger, or national security adviser Kissinger – and all the others who profited from the millions of civil and military casualties and wounded, the arms manufacturers and their shareholders.

      But sure, Jane Fonda personally did something to your husband!

    • Valiantly Varnished says:

      Jane has apologized NUMEROUS times. Let’s move on now. It’s been over 40 years.

  35. MaryContrary says:

    I read over that Jan Mohr piece in the Daily Mail last night-and found it totally infuriating. WTF is wrong with people that they can find fault with this???

  36. kerwood says:

    So I guess it IS possible to work on your maternity leave.

    • Peg says:

      Now you know Meghan, was not going to be sitting on her hands reading the tabloids.
      Wait until she is back full time from maternity leave and the other projects she was working on will hit the fan.

      • kerwood says:

        That’s probably the reason for the recent story about the Duchess of cambridge not having to work while on maternity leave. Keen Katie is probably panicking about all the work she’s going to have to do to keep up with Meghan. Expect a fourth Cambridge tot soon.

  37. Emmet says:

    To throw a wrench in this-
    Very happy MM did not include Amal Clooney in her list!

  38. Wilma says:

    Love the whole idea and am looking forward to buying the magazine. I’m especially looking forward to reading the interviews Harry and Meghan did.
    I do not like the addition of Salma Hayek and am kind of wondering why and how she ended up on the cover. Did you read her quote?
    Salma Hayek Pinault, women’s rights advocate, actor and producer
    “Twenty-five years ago, I started to become an activist for woman’s rights. Nobody wanted to talk about it. One time I heard: “That’s not a sexy cause.” It was a huge struggle. Now, everybody’s an activist.”

    Did her husband pull strings here?

    • Valiantly Varnished says:

      Now THAT I will agree with. Her spot definitely could gave gone to someone else and I do think her hubby pulled some strings to get her a spot.

      • Wilma says:

        I did not know Salma is and was a women’s rights activist. I read up on what she has done, but I’m not sure if she ever was as vocal about it as she seems to think she has been. I don’t like the way she portrays herself as a trailblazer when many women have gone before her. But most importantly I just can’t shake the way she spoke to Jessica Williams. It soured me on her.

      • Rogue says:

        Yes she was someone I could do without esp since her dismissiveness with Jessica Williams. She does have that Gucci-Chime for Change (?) woman empowerment organisation so maybe that was her in.

    • pottymouth pup says:

      where the hell did she get that people didn’t want to talk about women’s rights 25 years ago?

    • MA says:

      Salma was the one choice that I really disliked. She’s so tone deaf and ignorant. It is a business after all, maybe her husband did pull some strings.

  39. msn says:

    This is nicely done! I think Vogue+HRH are a great fit and it’s wonderful to see Duchess Megan forming these alliances with cultural capital -Vogue has a Black Man at the helm for the first time and he’s like Brit Fashion royalty himself.

    One grippe is this:
    **”The selection of women was a highly personal process for the Duchess and for Enninful, and the result of a collaboration that began in January of this year.”**
    -why is it that the selection of women featured isn’t exclusively British on British Vogue picked by a British HRH?

    I have all the time in the world for Chimamanda ‘We Should All Be Feminists’ Adichie, Kween Jane Fonda, Laverne ‘Best Life’ Cox, Salma and Adut-who is a great Insta follow, Jacinda Ahern is a model leader for me and I love love love Yara Shahidi and Kween Cristy T.
    But I can think of British women working in the same spaces as those international women and I’m a bit disappointed that Vogue & HRH didn’t give a spotlight to them.

    • wisdomheaven says:

      There are four British women on the cover, lots of CW women, and some Americans. Perfect mix.

      • MrsBump says:

        Personally I don’t really think it matters how many CW there are in her list, but i think only chimamanda adichie and PM Ardern are from the CW.
        Francesca Hayward was born in nairobi but she has British citizenship.
        I think the list skews a little too much towards actresses and models but vogue is vogue. Beauty privilege is the one bastion they will never storm.

      • msn says:

        @wisdomheaven “CW” meaning Canadian??
        All of these women are phenomenal but to not make it an exclusively British cover undoes some of the impact of British Vogue+HRH’s thinking behind this.

        Swap out Adut for Naomi Campbell and the numerous efforts she supports up and down Africa, Jane Fonda for Emma Thompson, Jacinda Ardern for Sarah Brown, Laverne Cox for Munroe Bergdorf, Chimamanda Adichie for JKRowling…

        I’m not mad at it, just feel it’s less groundbreaking in a meaningful way.

      • Jan says:

        Five British women on the cover, three from Commonwealth countries. Adwoa, Jameela, Francesca, Gemma and Ramla (I believe) are all British. Adut Akech is an Australian citizen.

        Honestly, I don’t understand the obsession with making it exclusively British. Edward Enninful obviously had no issue with it.

      • Desdemona says:

        msn
        CW = commonwealth?

      • Eloise says:

        If I read this correctly, Meghan said these were the women that inspire her, she never said she was going to choose worn that inspire every person in the world. We might disagree with her choices but they’re the people that she is inspired by so, I guess it’s what it is. She can’t please everyone and evidently, those looking to criticize her will always find something to criticize her about.

      • Burdzeye View says:

        Great line @Mrs Bump – “Beauty privilege is the one bastion they will never storm”. How true.

  40. Meg says:

    loving the freckles on the cover! not seeing them more often growing up really affected my self esteem as a woman with tons and tons of freckles all over my body

    • Mtec says:

      @Meg
      I personally think freckles are beautiful! And it was even a trend recently in the beauty community to draw on fake freckles on themselves. Meghan herself apparently wanted her freckles to show during her wedding. I hope you can continue to grow confidence about them cause there’s nothing wrong with them!

  41. Guest says:

    Lol the royal reporters are so pissed about this. dan wooten is getting dragged all over twitter

  42. sotheysay says:

    She could have done something like that with the Tig , why didn’t she.
    Also i see salma hayek on the list i hope that changes maker mean she finally learn more about diversity and the treatment of women of color in Hollywood and also apologize to Jessica Williams.

    • Amelie says:

      Because half of those women wouldn’t have bothered to be featured on The Tig. I know some people followed Meghan before she married Harry but I had never heard of her and I didn’t watch Suits. I had never heard of The Tig either and The Tig definitely never had the reach that the September issue of Vogue does. Let’s be real.

      Salma Hayek is problematic I’ll grant you that.

      • wisdomheaven says:

        She did several articles on the Tig focused on women change-makers, actually. And for being a smaller blog, she got a lot of bigger names to interview with her well before she was an HRH.

  43. Rojas says:

    Damn The DailyFail are hit piece after hit piece. They are so pressed

  44. Sophie says:

    I like the idea of portraying forces of change and also like the mirror thing. Just disappointed that so many of them are actresses and models. Why not take CEOs of NGOs or female judges at international criminal court etc. I mean Salma Hayek as women’s rights activist. Come on. Also yes there is diversity in terms featuring woc which is excellent, but I would have loved if not everyone was Vogue beautiful. Great exception: Greta.

    • Mtec says:

      Dismissing women because they are actresses or models is not helpful either. Maybe wait to read this issue to see what they had to contribute and then make a judgment, cause right now you’re looking at it very superficially.

      • Nahhhh says:

        Yeah I’d rather people feel jealous and envious of my beauty then to be completely dismissed and overlooked regardless of my accomplishments because I’m not. At the end of the day they know they are beautiful, people want to listen to them and get affording things in life others don’t simply for winning the genetic lottery.

      • Sophie says:

        I am not dismissing them. They can of course be forces of change. But are they THE forces of change you want to highlight? If you have the chance to shine a light on forces of change, why not use it to portray women who are not already in the spotlight as actresses and models. But oh well. It just annoys me. Like people like George Clooney being hailed as the greatest humanitarian when there are real humanitarians doing amazing work at great personal risk out there. Or in this case real women’s right activists who are in jail because of what they campaign for.

    • Burdzeye View says:

      @Sophie – I agree 100% with you….women with less star power/beauty would’ve been more real but it is Vogue, its still a fashion mag after all.

  45. Lily says:

    I can’t wait for this issue to come out, I’ll definitely be buying it on Amazon. I so wish Edward Enninful was our American Vogue editor instead of Anna. This is such a creative and well thought out issue. Kudos to hi and Duchess Meghan 🙂

  46. Amelie says:

    Wow! I had no idea she was collaborating with Vogue in any way so this surprised me when it dropped yesterday. I’m sure the haters are hating and I don’t feel like trying to figure out what about this makes them mad. I will say I don’t love the cover mostly because of the color/font used for the “Forces for Change” title but that’s just me!

    I would love to get my hands on this issue, not sure how that’ll be possible. Someone above commented Barnes & Noble will get it eventually? Anyways I think this is very on brand for Meghan and like the cook book, we will probably see her do more of these kinds of projects. She also clearly worked on this during most of her pregnancy, so nobody can say she did nothing during her maternity leave.

  47. MA says:

    Amazing. She is too good for the BRF. Outclasses most of them and more depth in her pinky than most of them combined.

    I for one am unbothered by the faux outrage. I will continue to feast on the salty tears while flipping through my first and only British Vogue purchase.

    • xo says:

      I agree that it’s a wonderful idea. However, I’ve just read her guest editor’s letter, & I’m cringing. I think Meghan is smart & sophisticated, but her use of language here (to my ear) reveals a conscious attempt to sound smart & sophisticated, which is so, so cringe-inducing.

      I may be alone in that opinion. I do root for her. . .

  48. Digital Unicorn says:

    You just know this will have triggered a certain other couple, who am sure will suddenly pop up this week in ‘surprise’ engagements even thou they are supposed to be in Mustique.

    I’ve said on here many times, both Princes married women who reflect who they are men. I think we can see who the better man is.

  49. Becks1 says:

    The interview with Michelle Obama is wonderful. Loved it.

  50. Peg says:

    Let’s not forget Harry’s interview with Dr. Jane Goodall, he did say they were a team.
    I think Harry and Meghan are at the point, where they put up their feet and laugh at the nonsense written about them.

  51. A says:

    Love the women who have been included on the cover. I have some reservations about some of them, but I’ll take the group with the spirit that it was intended.

    As for the criticism from the press–the press will criticize Meghan for the pure and simple reason that Meghan exists. She lives, goes about her day, and does what she wants to do, and the people in the press who believe that they’re the god-given arbiters of what is acceptable and what isn’t are going to be angry for as long as their power is challenged. They don’t like that someone is treating them as if they’re irrelevant, doubly so if the woman in question happens to be black and American on top of everything else.

    • Rogue says:

      Yes that’s true- her mere existence is offensive to some (saw an interesting twitter thread showing loads of Meghan royal journalist critics were Harry or Chelsy/Cressida stans so could explain the hate too!) so that’s why I query those who say they need to find a favourable journalist to give access to. It’s hard to find one in the Rota who hasn’t been vile

      • A says:

        Exactly. The British tabloid press, as well as the royal reporters, have been covering Meghan poorly long before she and Harry chose to snub them in turn. They decided that appealing to the worst, racist instincts of their readers would be more profitable for them. And now they’re surprised that Meghan and Harry want nothing to do with them? Anyone who insists that they’ve earned this reprehensible treatment hasn’t followed the coverage from the beginning.

      • MA says:

        @Rogue Richard Palmer used to call Cressida “Cressy” ewww

  52. bamaborn says:

    Lady Keller…Lol!!

  53. Well-Wisher says:

    The Duchess has turned the attention to people who ideas and works she find interesting.
    Happy Reading.
    Off to the newsstand.

  54. h3Rh1GHN3SS says:

    I’m so proud of Harry and admire how he as a man, recognized his level of privilege and how the woman he marries will be elevated thru him. in reality us women cannot escape the patriarchy…but what a powerhouse they are becoming. all couples should aspire to this. men need not be intimidated by us, empower us and put us in the spotlight. well done meg, well done harry, well don all around. what a great time to be alive.

  55. Rogue says:

    Hopefully my final comment but interested to learn that some designers from the Commonwealth and ethical brands will be highlighted. Hoping Edward hooks Meghan up with that UK stylist as my personal wish is for Meghan to use that fashion platform to put on more unknown designers.

    Just been reading about one organisation East London that is featured in Vogue is Luminary Bakery that provides employment training to women who have been victims of domestic violence or homelessness etc. Look forward to learning about the other charities highlighted.

  56. ArtHistorian says:

    I think guest-editing is a great idea – it allows her to direct the focus onto what she she works with and to craft her message.

    I also think it is very smart of her to keep things under wraps until there’s a finished project. There’s always a danger when you hype something up before you’ve even started work on it – because it becomes embarrassing if the project doesn’t pan out. In this respect, I think Kate could take a few pointers from Meghan. Do the work, present the result. Hyping things up and then failing to deliver is not a good look.

    • A says:

      The one project of Kate’s that was arguably the most successful in recent times has been the Chelsea Flower show garden. Yes, she had a lot of help with it probably, but she kept it under wraps, followed the lead of the people who were assigned to help her, and the end result was actually quite good I thought. Having clear goals and action items to help you implement your work makes a world of difference.

      • Tina says:

        Kate’s garden was lovely. I stood in the queue to see it. But if Meghan had presented that garden, she would have been absolutely pilloried. The teepee-like structure! The swing! The treehouse! So derivative, darling.

        I have a lot of sympathy for Kate. Her life cannot be an easy one. But the difference in her and Meghan’s treatment in the press is appalling, and astonishing.

      • MA says:

        @Tina the double standard is really something. With all the hype that Meghan brought, if her first project had been a garden instead of the Together cookbook, she would’ve been skewered. Even if it’d been an easing in project during her first year. Instead, she produced arguably one of the best projects a royal has ever done, with the most tangible results (excepting the Queen and Charles of course), all less than 1 year in. It’s so frustrating. Black women have to work twice as hard for half the praise.

      • Molly says:

        Such a low bar for Kate.

  57. Vv says:

    This collaboration with Vogue wasn’t really a secret,though. It was announced months ago that Meghan would have guest-edited Vogue for September,and that she had declined the cover.
    Obviously, the subject of the cover and the details of the content were never going to be disclosed. Sometimes it’s difficult to guess who will cover Vogue US, France even for those who really follow closely the activities of every fashion editor and photographer.

  58. Molly says:

    The British people have gone bat shit crazy over Meghan as guest Editor of Vogue. The meltdown is EPIC!

  59. blue36 says:

    This is tiring, I think the vogue cover was amazing, but when will all this hate stop? Is never complaining and never explaining really the best policy? Will this continue throughout her entire life and subsequently – her son’s? What’s the end going to look like I wonder.

  60. fabulousfunsteru says:

    Went to buy one this morning and was shocked to see just a regular model on the cover – had to double check here and she is doing the SEPT cover. Wow that makes this incredible achievement all the more brilliant. The Sept issue is the biggest selling issue of the year. We’ll done Meg can’t wait to get one