Kim Kardashian wore the $35K Dior X Soroyama purse to run errands in LA

Kim Kardashian and Kanye West celebrate at Craig's in West Hollywood!

Kim Kardashian is, I suspect, a purse person. I actually don’t think she’s into shoes as much as most fashionistas are – Kim seems happy enough to wear whatever clear plastic BS Kanye West designs on her feet. But Kim cares about purses. She loves her purses. She spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on her purses every year, I’m sure. So what’s the latest must-have purse for a Purse Obsessive like Kim? The $35,000 Dior saddle bag, of which only ten were produced. TEN. So ridiculous. But sure, a wearable collector’s item, and Kim wore hers for a pap stroll around LA, as she ran errands in Yeezys.

The bag was introduced on the Dior pre-fall 2019 menswear runway. It was a collaboration between Dior and Japanese artist Hajime Sorayama. And it’s ugly, right? I’m saying that as someone who also loves purses yet HATES saddle bags. I hate the design of the actual bag, but I’m okay with the silver and metal. But it’s just an ugly bag and you’re paying for the scarcity and the label.

This X17 video of Kim wearing the bag has convinced me that the point of this outing was to show off that Kim was one of the ten people in the world to own the bag. She wanted to be pap’d carrying it.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

59 Responses to “Kim Kardashian wore the $35K Dior X Soroyama purse to run errands in LA”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. petee says:

    Good Lord what a hideous purse.Can it get any uglier then this?

  2. huckle says:

    Fug

  3. minx says:

    So ugly.

    • LahdidahBaby says:

      Yep. But all in a Kardashian’s day’s work. Notice how toward the end of the clip as she’s walking at an angle she shifts it to keep it in view of the camera?

  4. Fluffy Princess says:

    She is so rich and yet, has the WORST fashion sense known to mankind. Of course, she was showing off that she had that bag…

    But, $35,000 for a bag? There are many people that don’t even make that much money in a year…

    Even if I had that kind of money, it’s still a purse. I could feel super swank with a $5000 Birkin bag — and even then, I would have a hard time paying that much for a bag. Seriously.

    • Rapunzel says:

      Birkins are way more than 5000. Just fyi.

      • Valiantly Varnished says:

        Yup. More like between 15-35k depending on the size. Birkins are in the same price range as the bag Kim is wearing.

      • Fluffy Princess says:

        Are they really? WOOOOOW! Okay, well then, THAT was a bad example! LOL

      • Rapunzel says:

        Fluffyprincess- there’re some birkins with 24k hardware that have gone for 200k plus.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        Do you think she paid full price or is she merching for Dior?

        I have no idea while Dior would want her but the thought crossed my mind.

      • Fluffy Princess says:

        @Rapunzel — HOW MUCH? I almost choked on my tea!! That is ridiculous. Honestly, someone should be ashamed to purchase a purse — A PURSE — for that much money.

        Thanks for the info tho. Celebitchies are the best. I learn so much here.

    • Valiantly Varnished says:

      I HIGHLY doubt she paid a dime for that bag. They probably paid HER to wear it out and about to generate publicity for the collection.

      • Nexus says:

        Some brands, sure. But Dior doesn’t need to do that – because Dior can certainly find ten morons on the level of Kimmy who WILL buy these.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        Are there ten morons on the level of Kimmie in actual existence?

      • Valiantly Varnished says:

        @Nexus lol. If Dior “didn’t need to do that”. They wouldn’t have contracts with celebs and pay them to come to their shows and sit in the front row – just like every other major fashion house. Dior is a BUSINESS just like any other. They make their money by staying relevant to younger audiences who shop based on what celebs are wearing. This isn’t the Dior of the 1950’s. It’s a company owned by LVMH.

      • Lady D says:

        @BTB, she has six in her immediate family alone. Then there’s Steve Mnuchin’s wife. Sadly, I think it’s possible.

  5. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    Good grief. Glad there’s only ten.

  6. Dani says:

    She looks ridiculous. That is the ugliest effing bag I’ve ever seen. Also the header pic of her is creepy. Literally dead behind the eyes.

  7. OriginalLala says:

    constant conspicuous consumption with these people…

  8. pantanlones en fuego says:

    Not only is that purse ugly AF it looks like it would be terribly uncomfortable too.

  9. ME says:

    Whenever I hear the words “Kim” and “purse” I automatically remember that time years ago when Kim hit Khloe with her purse because she thought Khloe was jealous of Kim’s Bentley lol.

    Oh and duh obviously she wanted to be seen wearing that bag. I am sure the paps got a 24 hour notice of where to be ha ha ! When is this girl studying for the bar exam? She’s always on vacation or doing pap strolls.

    • Zwella Ingrid says:

      @ ME–She doesn’t need to study. She will breeze right through it. It’s not that hard y’all (sarcasm).
      The “purse” looks more like a utility belt, or a jet pack—I know, a George Jetson tool .

  10. Valiantly Varnished says:

    Everyone is so up in arms but I’m actually chuckling. She didn’t pay for that bag y’all. Lol. In all likelihood they either paid HER to wear the bag or sent it to her for free and asked her to wear it. Which is why we have a pap stroll with her wearing the purse. Lolol.

    • DiegoInSF says:

      Yeah, I thought it’s obvious she doesn’t pay for anything as all the brands want her advertising power.

      • Valiantly Varnished says:

        Exactly. MOST celebs aren’t paying for the super expensive designer items they get photographed wearing. It’s free publicity for fashion houses.

  11. BengalCat😻 says:

    It looks like a homemade instrument a 1930s Appalachian hillbilly would play.

  12. Nicegirl says:

    It’s so so ugly. Ugh. A waste of $$$ IMO.

    Also I thought she said she was gonna avoid these displays of wealth (after that horrific Paris robbery).

    Maybe get that bag insured and ‘forget’ it somewhere

    • ME says:

      I remember her saying she was going to be less materialistic but really it seems like she’s gone the other way !

  13. MoreSalt says:

    I feel like that youtube idiot with the fake marriage wore one of these to said fake nuptiuals, but it was black? I couldn’t figure out what it was and didn’t care enough to go looking for an explanation.

  14. ChicagoAudrey says:

    I bet she didn’t even buy it, but was paid to walk around with it.

  15. eto says:

    Looks like a giant protractor, was that intentional?

  16. lucy2 says:

    Unattractive purse, and a gross parade of wealth and consumption. As usual.

    I can’t see paying more than $100 for a bag. I spill things, pens leak, etc. I just got a cute $25 dollar handmade one that I’ve gotten a bunch of compliments on.

    • Lady D says:

      I know it’s her money and she earned it, and 35K isn’t even a dent in her fortune, but whenever I hear of someone spending massive amounts of money on a status symbol I can’t help but think of how many shelter dogs or cats could have been fed with that amount of money. How many hot lunches at a struggling school, or even books for those schools? How much longer could a shelter have stayed open? There is so much good that could be done with that money… Is her looks really all she cares about? Who knows, maybe she does good with her money too.

  17. Lightpurple says:

    Why is that woman wearing part of a car door across her body?

  18. Kyla says:

    I’m a purse person. I really quite like the Dior saddle bag, but definitely not that version of it. While I think the price is outrageous, it’s her money, her choice. Also, I’m glad to see her actually use it. I would never buy a purse that I would be too scared to use.

    I don’t think she’s much of a purse person though. At least I never notice whatever she’s carrying. To me, Kris, Kylie and Khloe are the real purse collectors. The YouTube video of Kris showing off her Judith Lieber collection is quite good.

  19. FredsMother says:

    Is the purse meant to look like a gun. I see bullets. I actually see bullets. 30 large for that? Fool. Kanye about to be bankrupt with the cult domes he’s building. She better count her pennies and call her accountant

  20. Vauvert says:

    I didn’t even notice the purse. I was busy being nauseous and dizzy looking at the tie dye monstrosity that’s a tee masquerading as a dress / nightie…

  21. Pansy says:

    A public school teacher here, in a rural area who’s kids are struggling to afford school supplies, but ok Kim. And Dior.
    How about donating that to make sure America’s kids can eat three meals a day?
    I truly think even if I were a billionaire I couldn’t do this

    • Maria says:

      It’s a gross bag. That said, I do admire Dior for subsidizing the renovation of Marie Antoinette’s Maison de la Reine at the Hameau of the Petit Trianon at Versailles. It’s such an important piece of history to me, so I appreciated it.

    • Jane says:

      I agree with you Pansy. I’m a teacher (starting my 34th year) and know that the money spent on that purse alone could help our students .

  22. Jessie says:

    Why is she wearing a couch from the 70s as a dress?

  23. SURFCHICK says:

    With all that’s going on in this country why are people judging her because of a purse she used to go food shopping? Petty much.

  24. cupcake says:

    that purse is plain hideous!!

  25. Lynne says:

    She doesn’t run errands she does pap strolls

  26. Lisa says:

    Hideous bag.

  27. Dirk says:

    c3po wants his purse back