Prince Andrew & Sarah Ferguson jetted off to Spain, she ‘stands by him’

Embed from Getty Images

As we discussed yesterday, the Duke of York seems to have cut short his visit to Balmoral. He arrived in Balmoral last week, and he smilingly escorted his mother to church on Sunday, about 24 hours after Jeffrey Epstein’s body was found in his jail cell. A few days after that, Andrew was seen leaving Scotland on a private plane. So, where did he go? Well, it looks like he picked up Fergie – who had been at Balmoral too, before she was chased off by Prince Philip – and they headed off on a vacation together:

Fergie is taking “panicked” Prince Andrew on a romantic holiday to show the world she is standing by him amid scrutiny over his links to paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. The pair landed in Malaga this afternoon after flying out on a private jet without their two daughters. The Duke and Duchess of York were on the way to their favourite Spanish hideaway Sotogrande, after The Sun revealed they planned to stay on their own at a secret retreat. Royal insiders have revealed Andrew, 59, is starting to “s*** himself” over renewed attention after Epstein’s death in a New York jail while awaiting trial for sex ­trafficking. Sources insist Sarah Ferguson intends to show support for her ex-husband publicly — and wants to secure their renewed romantic relationship.

The insider explained: “The Duchess insisted she go on holiday with the Duke to look after him and show the world she stands by him. The Duke has been fairly relaxed up to now, he’s starting to s*** himself. It’s become the biggest story in the world and he’s at the heart of the coverage.”

Fergie has been resolutely supportive, royal insiders say. The source added: “She feels this is like the old days when they would take on the world together. She knows she has to get him away from all the headlines.”

Andrew and Fergie were meant to spend the week at Balmoral but left early and travelled today from Farnborough airport, Hants. They were spotted descending the steps of his private jet with luggage at Malaga at around 3pm.

[From The Sun]

“The Duke has been fairly relaxed up to now, he’s starting to s*** himself.” Well, there’s an image. Did Andrew only NOW realize that this whole mess looks terrible? Possibly. I mean, the Queen did the most to protect him, as she has done for years. We’ll probably never know the extent to which the Queen has protected him and insulated him and taken hits meant for him. But I can’t help but wonder if Andrew really is better off with Epstein dead. Of course Andrew knew that the stories wouldn’t stop. But I kind of wonder if Epstein had a mountain of personal information stocked up on Andrew and that’s why Andrew is slightly relieved these days. In some ways, this trip with Fergie could be seen as a nice, relaxing, celebratory vacation because the worst of it has been suppressed.

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Getty.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

134 Responses to “Prince Andrew & Sarah Ferguson jetted off to Spain, she ‘stands by him’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Ashley G says:

    Of course she does 🙄 she has nothing else in her life but him. It’s sad that any women would have such little regard for themselves that they would actually stay with a man who has sex with teenagers.

    • Lesanne says:

      They are both evil and oblivious.

      • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

        He is STILL her main source of income; he still gives her a place to live, keeps her in the “fringe” of society (invitations, etc). They BOTH are tied to Epstein. Wonder how many more “loans” Andy got for her from Epstein?

        They’re both disgusting users, one more odious, but both gross.

      • Still_Sarah says:

        @ TheOG@Jan90067 : Yes, Fergie has always stuck close to Andrew for the reasons you cited. And I think she’s enough of a grifter (admittedly not a very good one) that she understands her connection to the good life comes from him. There was a hilarious scene in the BBC comedy “The Windsors” where Fergie is chatting away at a dinner table to “Andy” and then the camera turns around and you see she is talking to a life-size cutout of Prince Andrew. Funny but you get the point – she has no other card to play other than her connection to Andrew.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      @AshleyG, I really believe Fergie thinks he is innocent.

      Here is what gets me: I never saw Andrew as a person who “chased” young girls. All his previous girlfriends (revealed in the press) and wife are older than he is. Vicki Hodge (b. 1946), Koo Stark (b. 1956) and Sarah Ferguson (b. 1959) are older than Andrew. I always saw him as a person who wanted a mommy figure girlfriend.

      However, I do believe he is guilty of something in all this Epstein mess probably financial and covering-up the knowledge of illegal sexual escapades.

      • Maria says:

        Tampa—this I have a hard time buying. Everybody knew what Epstein was up to, she took money from him through his office, I’m sure she’s seen the pics with Virginia Roberts, neither she or Andy is innocent and they know it themselves.

      • Dani says:

        I hate that excuse. I have only dated and married men older than me and it means literally NOTHING. Andrew is his mothers favorite – he doesn’t need a mommy figure. He is just a disgusting pig, nothing less.

      • DS9 says:

        He didn’t need to chase them if it was being arranged.

        Also, it’s not uncommon for men to want one thing in a partnership while actively seeking something else sexually.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        @Maria & DS9, I am not saying that Andrew is innocent of sleeping with under-aged girls. What I am saying is that I have a hard time wrapping my head around this one. I am sure he is guilty of something because he sure-as-hell is acting like a guilty person.

        I personally think that if and when all this mess comes out it is going to be much bigger and must weirder than anything anyone could have imagined.

        I am NOT trying to take up for Randy Andy.

      • Maria says:

        Tampa— I absolutely didn’t think you were taking up for him! I just think Fergie knows he’s not innocent because she isn’t either is all. So gross…

      • kerwood says:

        @TampaBay He probably chose a certain type for his ‘public’ partnerships to cover up his secret ‘personal’ sexual activity. He wouldn’t be the first person to do that in an attempt the throw people off the scent.

        If I were Andrew, I wouldn’t relax too much. Epstein’s partner (Maxwell) is still at large and SHE probably has a lot of information that she will use to either make money or cut a deal with the feds. Maybe Andrew was so relieved because the Queen has already cut a BIG cheque.

      • Nic919 says:

        There is a quote attributed to Ghislaine Maxwell where she states that the girls were considered to be trash. I bring this up because Andrew was never dating these girls, but using them as objects. Perhaps he does focus on slightly older women for real relationships, but that’s not what these girls are to him. Disposable and irrelevant once their purpose is fulfilled.

      • SMF says:

        I’m loathe to notice how spoiled elites “see themselves” as above rules or laws, ie, wearing fur, dining on near extinct species & partaking in sexual aberrations. This entitlement for the taboo is something lurid & heinous, conspiracy… yet the Epstein case is proof on a global scale- in our face & unavoidable. Prince Andrew is implicated and very likely guilty. Fergie knows. Everyone now knows.

  2. Eener says:

    Did you see he has announced he is retiring after lots of “a long period of severe personal stress”!!!!

  3. Wadsworth the Butler says:

    Never seen Andrew described as “panicked” before. A photo op with Mummy isn’t going to make this story go away this time.

    • Xo says:

      If anything, it made it worse by making her look TERRIBLE.

      I still can’t believe that photograph.

      I really don’t think Andrew has the resilience to weather this storm.

      • bamaborn says:

        Yes, XO…she was looking just as disgusting with that smug grin. Honestly hope I’m around when karma strikes.

      • Megan says:

        His only fear is PR. Apparently having sex with a minor is not a federal crime. He would need to he charged at the state level and who knows where that would stand in terms of statute of limitations. All these creeps are going to get away with it.

      • Some chick says:

        He really does resemble Porchey… just sayin’

    • Megan says:

      Laying low does not mean jetting off to a private estate in Spain. Does the BRF not realize how damaging these allegations are? HM looks like a patsy.

  4. Citresse says:

    Fergie stands by the dough…how much does she owe now? That woman is beyond pathetic. Her relationship with Andrew? They deserve each other.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      Does anyone know what Fergie is/was spending all the money on?

      • C-Shell says:

        Never appeared to be wardrobe or health/self-care.

      • Citresse says:

        They have that Swiss property to maintain….Andrew hides a lot in that country, but Fergie never learns with regard to her spending habits…she’s a lot like the late Queen mother that way….that old racist alcoholic was rumored to owe over 7 million pounds at the time of her death.

      • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

        I remember a People story from eons ago… “Friends” were quoted (as “insiders” of course, not by name) saying “Sarah is *so* good hearted. If she knows someone really wants something, she’ll buy it for them, regardless of cost for the most part” (this is paraphrased of course!). The article said she sent a friend this antique table because the friend “admired” it in a shop they went into.

      • Mellie says:

        Bad clothes, shoes and hats.

      • Montréalaise says:

        She’s a spendaholic with extravagant tastes – lots of vacations in expensive resorts and more. I remember when the marriage ended and she was reportedly $4 million in debt. She flew to NYC to discuss sponsorship deals to help pay down the debt and flew there on the Concorde, which cost about twice the price of business class on a commercial plane. Heck, if you’re being choked by debt, fly economy class!

      • Lady D says:

        Hey Citresse, any idea how, the Queen Mother could die owing millions? I would laugh at a queen that tried to borrow money from me, plus she had the royal family wealth behind her. How is it possible she died owing that much?

      • Maria says:

        Lady D- apparently she just couldn’t keep to her Civil List income. She loved outfits that were five figures, partied a lot with the most expensive foods and champagnes, kept quite a bit more staff than the others did, she completely redid Clarence House when her daughter became queen (even though it had just been redone by Philip and Elizabeth – shades of Two Kitchens Kate?), she collected expensive art and spent a lot on horses.
        She had a Faberge pearl bell to ring during meals. You get the idea.
        Nice work if you can get it, as they say…

      • notasugarhere says:

        The Queen Mum locked 2/3 of her private wealth away in trust at age 94. As long as she lived seven years after that, those assets were inherited by others tax free. That’s part of why she went into debt, because she couldn’t access most of her private money after that.

        Look for the 2002 Guardian article, The Gamble That Foiled the Taxman .

      • Karen says:

        The QM used overdrafts on her bank account(s). The banks sucked it up and let her do it. After she died, the Queen had to pay it off. I dont know if they charged interest or overdraft costs though. Probably not.

  5. Lisa says:

    Where did all of the dirt Epstein had on people go when he died? If he had actual physical evidence, that evidence is in someone else’s hands now, no? So it will either come out, or he will be blackmailed with it I would guess.

    • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

      There was a HUGE fire on his private island. Wanna bet a lot of his blackmail info and personal cache of his papers went up in smoke?

    • TQ says:

      The reporting is starting to point to a trove of video recordings. Reports from the FBI raids in NYC and Great St James/Little St James are saying that rooms were wired and labelled videos are being found. That would explain a lot in terms of Epstein blackmailing the rich and powerful like Andrew. So some dirt is in the FBI’s hands, and some may have been passed to Ghislaine Maxwell or some of his other associates. Some could also still be squirreled away elsewhere (safety deposit box? hidden room?).

      • Melody calder says:

        From what I’ve been reading the locals say that things have been being taken off of that Island for weeks now ever since he was arrested. So I would assume most things were removed before the FBI even got there. I have a feeling what has been left behind is basically going to be about people who don’t matter or the people who are already being publicly condemned and all the ones we don’t know about, the people who really matter, have been covered up

    • Chaine says:

      Well, law-enforcement had already raided his mansion in New York, and I saw that the FBI raided his virgin islands compound after he died. I don’t know if that means more will come out on Andrew, but I assume they’re looking for other people to prosecute.

    • Dani says:

      By the time they raided the Island, majority of the evidence had been removed and then there was that perfectly timed fire.

  6. Jess says:

    I’ve grown to like Queen E over the past several years but that photo above – of her grinning with Awful Andrew next to her – makes me sick to my stomach. As a mom I get wanting to protect your kids but this grinning photo op is tantamount to defending him at the expense of the victims and it shows that the royals will always be royals – taking care of themselves and not caring about the “peasants” who get hurt along the way. So gross. The only “silver lining” I see in all of this is that it makes the British journalistic double standard (in the way they treat Meghan vs Andrew) so crystal clear it’s hard for anyone but the most racist to deny it.

    • HyacinthBucket says:

      The Queen is not very good with public opinion in a crisis. I doubt she registers what impression she makes in this picture, she’s not interested. We saw the same in the immediate aftermath of Diana’s death. She is simply not good at this.
      As for what she really thinks about things. We will never know, she never shares her thoughts or feelings.

    • bamaborn says:

      Jess…I’m with you! Have granddaughters and the site of that pedo with his mum was stomach churning.

  7. adastraperaspera says:

    Considering what he must know about Epstein’s clients and mob bosses, Andrew might be afraid of more than just litigation. Nasty business, full of dangerous people with a lot to lose if he’s been talking to MI6.

  8. Hermione says:

    Cue the comments and complaints about “the use of private jets and lavish spending” to jet off to a secluded vacation spot.

    • kerwood says:

      That only happens when it’s the Sussex family. So he’s safe as long as he didn’t take them with him.

  9. HyacinthBucket says:

    Prince Andrew was nicknamed “Randy Andy” during the eighties. He had the reputation of not being in control of his urges.

    To get a picture for what kind of time this was, I suggest you all watch the Columbo episode “Columbo cries Wolf”. This is how you have to look at the Epstein crimes and why he and his associates could abuse women and girls without any of the abusers feeling any qualms. They considered it their right and the cool thing to do.

    I remember that time well, it wasn’t a good time to be a woman. I’m glad times are very different now. I hope they all go to jail.

    • Some chick says:

      I wish times were very different now. Times are a *little* different now.

      But systemic racism, sexism, abuse of women and girls are all still going strong. Xenophobia – this time, we’re in bed with the Russians instead of being afraid of them, but it’s not that different. Now the threat is the brown people. The Statue of Liberty is only for euorpean immigrants. Etc etc etc ad nauseum.

      Hell, back in the ’80s Trump was just an another annoying gasbag that you didn’t have to care about!

      Sorry to be a Negative Nelly. We’ve still got a long long long way to go.

      • HyacinthBucket says:

        We do, some chick, we do. At least over here, women who are in their mid 20s have a very different life than when I was their age. OTOH their role models are “influencers” on insta… *sigh

  10. Sof says:

    They think that by being together the accusations will stop? Is Fergie part of the “let’s protect the duke’s image” plot?
    This whole thing disgusts me and I sincerely hope the victims get the justice they deserve.

  11. Harla says:

    I can’t even imagine how this is affecting Beatrice and Eugenie. And Eugenie is starting a podcast about slavery/human trafficking, is she going to talk about the biggest story of sexual slavery in the news today? Is she going to delay starting her podcast in the hopes that this story will die down and she won’t have to discuss it? How is this affecting their other relationships?

    • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

      Gotta admit, I thought that Eug coming out with a podcast on this topic, KNOWING what was out there (for years!) about her father and Epstein…. how could she think she wouldn’t be asked about it, or skewered for it?? As an adult, she *has* to know what’s been out for the last 20 yrs or so about Epstein’s reputation and his connection to her father…?

      • Helen says:

        She isn’t ill-informed, she has to know. I wonder if this is a, “I’ve heard all of this and want to do something to make amends/pay it forward for what a complete and total arse my parents are,” move.

      • A says:

        I’ll bet she knows full well, but doesn’t want to confront the reality. Imagine having to deal with that with your parent. I don’t think she’s interested in paying it forward or anything like that at all. I’ll bet that her taking on the podcast bit was just an attempt at trying to divert the attention somehow, but it’s failed miserably since.

      • Alyse says:

        Honestly like that spoof show “The Royals” come to life…

    • Darla says:

      I don’t care

    • Here In My Jammies says:

      Beatrice went to church with dad and granny. She was in another car. Grinning.

  12. OriginalLala says:

    So gross – I hate that we paid to support his lifestyle while he committed crimes…I hope justice comes quick

  13. Who ARE These People? says:

    On top of all their other negative personal qualities and misdeeds, they’re not very bright, are they.

  14. Flying fish says:

    These people are disgusting.

  15. Nobody says:

    Wait no one want to discuss about who pay for the private jet and their holiday??

    • OriginalLala says:

      I think many would but maybe the fact that he is a rapist is a bigger problem right now?

      • Ertia says:

        Indeed. If Meghan and Harry had whipped off on holiday WHILE BEING ACCUSED OF HORRIFIC CRIMES, yeah, that would be probably discussed more. I know people are doing this on purpose but it’s very transparent.

  16. intheknow says:

    wow. Prince Andrew has apparently announce he is retiring from public life per BBC. I am looking for proper links to post this update.

    • Ertia says:

      Per the BBC? Nope. Think you’ve been had, darling.

    • olive says:

      that tweet is from a parody account and was posted 2 days ago. it’s not a real BBC reporter. if it were real, you’d have heard about it from legit news sources by now.

  17. DenG says:

    I can’t comprehend a royal lifestyle of privilege, entitlement, massive wealth and resources provided by the “bent backs and bowed heads” of their subjects. (Just saw Robin Hood with Taron Egerton and Jamie Foxx. Timely and timeless, I think.

  18. Digital Unicorn says:

    They have a dysfunctional co-dependent relationship – she needs him for the money and royal adjutant lifestyle, and he needs her cause she massages his ego and is the only women who has ever put up with him and his antics.

    And yeah I think they are in a relationship and have been for some time, the only reason they haven’t gone public is because of his father who hates her.

  19. BayTampaBay says:

    Did Andrew cheat on Fergie during their marriage? I never heard anything regarding infidelity but wonder if anyone else did?

  20. Seraphina says:

    The sight of him makes me ill now because I will forever see that smile on his face as he went to church showing the world who he really is: a man who does what he wants with no show of remorse because mummy protects him. Question to those in the know: what are his numbers like and what type of philanthropy does this man get involved with???

  21. leena says:

    I hold absolutely no brief for Andrew at all but can I just mention that whilst most of us find much older men having sex with teenagers revolting, it is not actually illegal unless there is coercion. I am only saying this because the tone of some of the posts seems to suggest it is.

    Would also mention that the age of consent in the UK is 16.

    I make no excuses for Andrew at all before anyone jumps down my throat. I don’t like him either.

    • Maria says:

      Human trafficking is coercion. He was having sex with trafficked girls. Virginia Roberts is the only one we have a photo of, with Andrew. Who knows what else happened.
      Virginia Roberts was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell when she was 15. Andrew had to have known this at the very least. Who knows who else he slept with, who isn’t coming forward.

      • leena says:

        I didn’t say there wasn’t coercion, I was trying to point out that the age of consent is different in the UK to most of the US.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        @Ileena, I understand and hear what you are saying; you are looking at this mess from a pure legal point of view.

        In the USA the age of consent varies state by state and also by age of the partner (i.e…two thirteen years old having consensual sex). If Virginia Roberts was not underage then the charges (at least in the USA) would have to be some type of rape or coercion.

        “Statutory rape” or ‘taking a minor across state lines” is not going to work if the victim is not a minor.

      • Maria says:

        Leena- It’s still illegal even disregarding age of consent, it counts as slavery.
        30 states in the US have 16 as the age of consent as well as the UK.

      • Karen says:

        He wouldnt have known Virginia Roberts was trafficked “at the very least’. He wouldnt have thought of it at all. It was a 17 year old being offered up to him. He was the dummy that got caught with the pictures. Somewhere else there would be Virginia’s report on what he did, liked, said.

      • Maria says:

        Karen — I don’t buy that. He and Epstein were close friends for years and he knew how he recruited underage girls. Both Epstein and Maxwell coached Roberts on how to please Andrew, among others. Of course he knew.

    • perplexed says:

      In most cases, wouldn’t coercion be involved though? I find it hard to believe a teenager would want to do it with Alan Dershowitz willingly.

      It may not be illegal, but I don’t necessariy think it’s ethical.

    • Melissa says:

      It is illegal when those teenage girls were brought to another country for the sole purpose of having sex.

    • leena says:

      @BTB yes I was talking from a legal point of view, not a moral one. MY views on the moral side are the same as everyone else’s

      • Nic919 says:

        From a legal point of view, human trafficking is illegal regardless of the age of the victim. I don’t know why these age of consent talking points are being repeated because they are dangerous and they are wrong. These women did not choose to be with Epstein and they are no different than what R Kelly did, except R Kelly had a smaller operation.

        Most people here aren’t lawyers and it’s obvious when the age of consent “arguments” are being trotted out. The victims have stated that they were forced to do this and that is what is illegal here. Virginia Roberts could be 20 but she was never there of her own choice when she was with Andrew. And since we know he was friends with Epstein, he can’t pretend to be blind to what was going on.

    • Leena says:

      Hey folks I did say “Unless there is coercion”

  22. EM says:

    They are terrible, they are awful, I still want them to get remarried?

    • BayTampaBay says:

      “I still want them to get remarried?” The Curse of Diana and Diana’s Revenge on Prince Philip! LOL! LOL!

      Also, we really need a good show and a good laugh for half-a-day to divert us from the antics of Donald J. Chump.

    • olive says:

      they deserve each other!!

    • Here In My Jammies says:

      I don’t want them to remarry. They make me want to vomit. Any woman who would stay with such a cad is vomit worthy.

  23. Green Is Good says:

    Of course she’s standing by him. He has money.

  24. mk says:

    Fergie got $15K from Epstein, she’s guilty too.

  25. Rae says:

    My personal opinion of the Queen and Sarah have taken a massive nose dive because of Andrew.

    If he has nothing to hide, allow him to clear his name and assist in the investigations. All this shielding him makes him look even more dodgy and doesn’t reflect well on either of them.

    • Here In My Jammies says:

      My view of Sarah took a nose dive when she was video taped selling access to Andrew.

  26. gingersnaps says:

    Why is sarah still being regarded as a duchess when she lost that title when they divorced?
    These two deserve each other so much. I just wish they & all the other people involve in this get their comeuppance soon.

    • notasugarhere says:

      She didn’t lose her title in the divorce. She lost the HRH several months later, as a result of Diana’s divorce negotiations, but she kept the title. Fergie remains “Sarah, Duchess of York” just not HRH The Duchess of York. She only loses the title if she marries someone else.

  27. Fluffy Princess says:

    Of Course she is standing by him. Duh. She’s going to give up her lavish lifestyle, all her perks? Not in a million years. If she did, THAT would be more shocking than Andrew’s pedo ways. We’ve all known about Andrew for eons, but he is protected because he is the HRH Duke of York. If Sarah were to move out, tell him to shove off and be on her own — come on, we would all be flabbergasted.

  28. KEEKS says:

    I’m utterly disgusted. Everyday that goes by and he is not being handcuffed in front of some hotel. Better yet, be the gentleman he thinks he is and turn himself in. If only for his daughters. But, where are the articles from People Mag now about how Eugenie and Beatrice had a more stable upbringing then the two princes. Now we know it was Randy Andy’s diversion to what was coming. I just feel sick, and if we don’t expose Andrew, Bill Clinton, Trump and anybody else involved in this ring, young girls will always be prayed on and have to look over their shoulders. IT’s total BS.

    • A says:

      He will never turn himself in. It’s precisely because he thinks he’s a gentleman that he fully believes he can get away with this type of behaviour.

  29. Sarabe says:

    How shameless can you be?
    By the way who do we think is the royal insider giving all these vomit inducing quotes about romantic getaways and how this woman intends to publicly support this awful man?
    Have the royals, including the Queen, ever looked more clueless? Maybe people will finally be motivated to agitate for change. Unfortunately we have so many problems in this country right now. Knowing that my taxes are being used to support such people makes me feel so terrible!

    • A says:

      I’ll bet some of it is Fergie, and some of it is just the Queen’s advisors who are tasked with trying to paper this over and failing miserably (hence the whole, “he’s sh-tting himself in fear.”)

      • Sarabe says:

        I think you’re right. I didn’t care much about Fergie one way or another until now, but now I see how pathetic, out of touch and vile she is!

    • Col says:

      The Queen may look clueless, but she’s 93. I’m not saying that she’s not great for her age but asking her to be PR savvy on something so difficult to navigate might be too much now. If you don’t have dementia and memory loss at her age you’re doing awesome. She might believe him when he says he’s innocent. I’m in favour on getting rid of the whole stupid institution asap.

  30. Ty says:

    What about the Queen?

  31. Liz version 700 says:

    I can’t imagine how Beatrice and Eugine grew up half way functional with this pair for parents. Honestly, they are wretched.

  32. Maria says:

    Ghislaine Maxwell was spotted at an In N Out Burger in LA.

    • Some chick says:

      Receipts on that?

      I very much doubt she’s anywhere in the US. She is hiding, most likely offshore. It’s very dangerous for her here.

      • Maria says:

        I wonder if Ghislaine Maxwell is still alive. I wouldn’t be surprised if she offed herself.

      • Maria says:

        There are pictures of her at said In N Out in LA. Business Insider and the Telegraph covered it as well as several other outlets.

  33. JRenee says:

    This isn’t just going to go away this time…

  34. SJR says:

    “Stands by him.” I call BS!
    Fergie knows good and well all of the ugliness that P.Andy has been involved in. She is also not about to let go off her Golden Goose, ever.
    She will be “ride or die” with Randy Andy until one of them is planted.

    Vile, disgusting people.

  35. Snap Happy says:

    Who’s plane is that? Does Andrew have the cash to splash on a private plane?

  36. Maria says:

    I have a really dumb question. Can a member of the Royal family be prosecuted in Britain? Or are they immune? Any cases of that happening in the past?
    Presumably these events/crimes took place in the US, so he would be extradited and charged there, is that right?

    • Ex-Mel says:

      It’s not a dumb question at all. The monarch enjoys “sovereign immunity”, so she could even kill someone in broad daylight, witnesses present, and not be arrested or prosecuted. The monarch is literally above the law – other “royals”, however, are not.

    • Tina says:

      The Queen has sovereign immunity (which most heads of state do). Other royals can and have been prosecuted in the UK, most recently Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs Act. If the US wanted to try him, they’d have to seek to extradite him.

  37. A says:

    Fergie has been LIVING for this moment. The woman is a diehard narcissist who loves to be needed. It inflates her own sense of importance and superiority, and damn if Andy doesn’t need her right now. She’s thoroughly enjoying the whole martyr shtick of standing by her man. The whole thing where the article is like, “it’s them against the world” screams to that type of romanticism. Except this isn’t Bonnie and Clyde, it’s the fact that her husband’s indiscretions are finally catching up to him, and he seems to fully know it.

    As Virgina Roberts said, “We have the truth on our side.” I just hope that it sees the light of day.

    • Tourmaline says:

      You are so right, the ‘them against the world’ quote had to come straight from Fergie. It has that feverish delusional sound to it.

  38. bamaborn says:

    Ally…the episode where Bea and Eug decided they would look for jobs was hilarious. Eug said “I think it’s where people go into buildings or something.” Great parody.

  39. blunt talker says:

    If Andrew has nothing to hide and had no involvement with Epstein, then he should assist with the officials who are looking into this case. He looks more guilty by trying to avoid or lay low from the public. Help with the investigations, Andy.