Sarah Ferguson thinks Virginia Roberts needs to be ‘drilled’ in an upcoming interview

The BFI Luminous Fundraising Gala 2019 held at The Roundhouse, Camden

Here’s something which makes my blood boil, and I hope this is the very end of any sympathy for Sarah Ferguson, if she was even seen as sympathetic at all. Fergie has been doing the most to help her ex-husband Prince Andrew. She really thought they would eventually remarry and that she would eventually be allowed back into the royal fold. Now that Andrew’s BBC interview blew up in his face and he’s been shunned everywhere, Fergie’s dreams are also over. Fergie reportedly wanted Andrew to do the interview, because that’s how dumb she is too. Fergie couldn’t take enough credit for it…until she realized how bad it was, and so now, of course, she’s claiming that she didn’t have anything to do with it. Fergie’s latest is that she wants to ensure that Virginia Roberts is grilled during Virginia’s interview on the British new show Panorama. Virginia is a rape victim and victim of human trafficking. Ghislaine Maxwell procured her, trafficked her to Jeffrey Epstein, then Epstein and Ghislaine trafficked Virginia to Prince Andrew three times. And Fergie thinks Virginia needs to be, like, held to account.

Pals of the Sarah Ferguson have demanded the BBC put Virginia Roberts – a “sex slave” of paedophile Jeffrey Epstein – “on the rack”. The Duchess of York has urged the broadcaster to “drill” Ms Roberts and subject her to the same level of scrutiny as her ex-husband in his car-crash BBC Newsnight interview.

Ms Roberts has accused Andrew of having sex with her on three occasions when she was aged 17 in 2001 and being trafficked by his paedo pal Epstein. In the controversial Newsnight interview, the Duke claimed he had taken his daughter Princess Beatrice to a Pizza Express in Woking on a night he’s accused of sleeping with Ms Roberts. The 35-year-old is being interviewed for Panorama, which is being broadcast on Monday.

Friends of the Duchess of York, 60, told the Daily Telegraph: “She [Virginia Roberts] should be properly cross examined on all the evidence that doesn’t stack up. She should be put on the rack. The BBC cannot drill him as they did and just believe her when there are lots of inconsistencies.”

The friend of the Duchess said the BBC should also ask Epstein’s accuser how much money she has got for a photo showing Andrew with his arm draped around her at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell. The friend said they thought the photograph had been sold for almost £150,000.

[From The Sun]

Imagine saying this about a woman who is a rape victim and a victim of human trafficking. Imagine wanting this to be “out there” in the media. Virginia Roberts was trafficked to Fergie’s ex-husband and Fergie’s argument is “Well, why doesn’t she have more evidence for HER story?!!?” Imagine thinking that Andrew was “drilled” by the BBC and that they need to go even harder on the trafficking victim he raped. Fergie must be stopped. This is asinine and deeply offensive.

Also: Fergie took money from Epstein! Andrew wasn’t even asked about that in the interview, and zero people are demanding that Fergie get “drilled” about her friendship with Epstein and Maxwell.

Britney Spears, Sam Asghari attends The Beauty Awards in Los Angeles

Prince Andrew interview

Photos courtesy of WENN, ABC and BBC.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

156 Responses to “Sarah Ferguson thinks Virginia Roberts needs to be ‘drilled’ in an upcoming interview”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Purplehazeforever says:

    Oh Lord..she’s a moron & vile.

    • Christo says:

      Agreed. Sarah is an opportunist of the worst kind. Did anybody catch her latest foray into international relations by complimenting the Saudi Prince? Yeah, the same one behind a journalist’s dismemberment and burning. You just know that Weight Watchers and Oprah regret ever having crossed paths with this swine.

    • Ronaldinhio says:

      She is being set up as a patsy for Andrew and the Royal Family.
      Look how this vile creature made Andrew do the interview and now wants to cross examine a victim/survivor
      All these statements are also being released to gauge public opinion

      She came out against Epstein ages ago

  2. Enn says:

    I have no time for this wrinkled paper bag wearing a red wig.

    • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

      OMG I nearly ruined my laptop spitting out my coffee, laughing at this image!! 😂😂👏🏻

    • Tourmaline says:

      Accurate

    • Gabby says:

      I hope this despicable witch is stewing, knowing her dreams of remarrying and living that life is never going to happen now. She’s always been a greedy opportunist, and I’m glad to watch her get a little karma too.

    • lsb says:

      Wait a minute. The lady says something deeply offensive about a child rape victim – and the big things you flagellate her on are her wrinkles and ginger hair? What is wrong in this universe?

    • xo says:

      It’s a step too far, deriding her appearance. Age is not synonymous with ugliness/lack of worth & we all lose when, in anger, people push that idea for the pain it can inflict.

      Grow up & make an intelligent criticism.

    • xo says:

      It’s a step too far, deriding her appearance. Age is not synonymous with lack of value/ugliness & we all lose when, in anger, people throw that idea around for the pain it can inflict.

      *Sorry, if this is a repost, my first attempt timed out.

  3. Mignionette says:

    I saw this quote and was beyond disgusted. The idea that she she feels the victims are the one whom need to be treated in this way when her own rapist of a live in cuckolding husband is just insane.

    Side note I think I am beginning to understand why these two HAD to divorce. It was the only way they could both live their sordid life styles whilst still staying together. Fergie is a grubby money grabbing enabler.

    • Monicack says:

      They divorced because Fergie was actually mistreated and neglected during her marriage. She was mocked mercilessly by the press, thrown under the bus by Diana and left alone for insane stretches of time by Andrew. Andrew changed his mind about the divorce at the last minute but Philip said over my dead body. Fergie got one of the worst divorce settlements ever and continued to be reviled by the media. Andrew told her he would make it up to her and support her.

      The truth is Andrew knew he could rely on her gratitude and allegiance. It has been reported by people who know that Fergie is not on the bright side, enjoys living the good life and legitimately believes every single word that comes out of Andrew’s mouth. He uses that to hide his dirty work. She’s been dangled in front of the world’s shadiest billionaires for years. Andrew is a sick sociopath and I very much want to keep the spotlight on him.

      • Maria says:

        Stop. This woman was taking money from her daughters’ own trust funds. She is as guilty as Andrew.

      • Oliviajoy1995 says:

        She was also caught having an affair with her accountant or something and pictures were taken of him sucking on her toes if I remember. (Gross) Didn’t she also charge people money to get access to Prince Andrew within the last few years. Sarah is a mess.

      • MariaS says:

        While I agree the focus should remain on Andrew first and foremost, anyone who defends him and disparages the woman who was his trafficked teen victim is fair play. Sarah Ferguson is a grown woman with two daughters who is attacking a victim because she knows on which side her bread is buttered. That is disgusting. Any shoddy treatment she received decades ago has doesn’t change that fact.

      • minx says:

        I felt some sympathy for her years ago, but no more. Maybe she had an unhappy childhood, her marriage failed, she had a bad self image, she got a rotten divorce settlement, whatever. We all have problems. She had many, many chances to straighten up. She still kept getting into financial trouble, she kept grifting, she kept associating with the Epsteins of the world. Enough.

      • Monicack says:

        Lol I have no sympathy for Fergie. I am looking at it all factually. In black and white without hysteria. Andrew capitalized on her greed and lack of intelligence/ethics to do horrible and also illegal things. Fergie will never believe he is guilty of being a rapist and a pedophile. This defines an enabler. This also characterizes spouses of abusers. Just like Georgina Chapman not all victims are people we want to like. fergie will never be likable. She did that. But Andrew is the sociopath. Andrew is the criminal.

      • Abena Asantewaa says:

        Please stop with this fabrication. Andrew never treated her badly. He was away in Falklands. Fergie was bailed out more than once by The Queen, from her debtors, she treated Andrew as a comodity, by taking money from a fake Sheik, for a meeting with Andrew. She took money from Epstein; a mere $15, Fergie is not much help for the gullible and thick Andrew, because Fergie is not smart either; the blind leading the blind. Why did they divorce anyway, only to hang around each other, long into the adulthood of their daughters.

      • Monicack says:

        Abena
        I strongly suggest you read a few well sourced royal biographies. Tabloid headlines do not tell the story. We do have lots of information about the York marriage. We may never know the extent of Andrew’s crimes. And if you think Andrew is “gullible” and was somehow Fergie’s victim I truly have nothing to say to you that would make much sense. It may well have been Fergie that kept her daughters away from Epstein despite her other moral failings. Regardless. Andrew is the rapist pedophile here.

      • MariaS says:

        “I have no sympathy for Fergie. I am looking at it all factually. In black and white without hysteria.”

        - says the poster who has now posted three times defending the person who is defending the criminal and disparaging his victim…and who also took money from Epstein. Offering odd excuses such as the BRF were mean to her and she’s stupid. Hmm.

      • Monicack says:

        MariaS
        These are not defenses. Defenses against what, by the way? What I have gathered from my extensive reading tells me that she is unintelligent, avaricious and lacks a moral epicenter. If this is me defending her then she needs better trolls. Each of my responses deals with what I see as fallacies. Latching on to handpicked bullet points makes you feel better but does not expand the conversation. Given the fact that the BRF has harbored this criminal tells me it’s a conversation worth having. It is better than parroting headlines imo.

      • PrincessK says:

        Well Phillip would want Fergie out of his sight, especially as he is rumoured to have had an affair with her mother.

      • Lady D says:

        Say what, PrincessK?

    • PrincessK says:

      Yes, and this is why l am so mad that people think Meghan is not good enough for the RF and that Phillip was the one to enforce discipline.

  4. nettie says:

    These people are disgusting and the further Kate, William, Harry and Megs can distance themselves the better. I don’t see how the Queen can tolerate this crap and support these fools.

  5. Becks1 says:

    Ugh.

    first, that was the “amazing” part of the Andrew interview. he WASNT drilled. Yes, she asked him questions that no one may have ever asked him on camera before, but overall I thought she was relatively easy on him as these things go – he did all the damage himself.

    As for Fergie – she’s disgusting. No, a sex trafficking victim should not be put “on the rack” in the hopes that it somehow exonerates Andrew. Andrew’s pretty much past that now.

    • NotSoSocialButterfly says:

      Not to mention the fact that the pedo prince initiated the interview.
      Good god.

    • AnnaKist says:

      Yes, it wasn’t what I’d call a hard-hitting interview. It’s early morning here in Australia. Last night, I watched the British documentary, “The Prince and the Paedophile“. My god. Epstein and his pimp, Ghislaine Maxwell should have been banged up years ago, along with the prince. I felt physically ill hearing what they’d all got up to. And here is this disgusting excuse for a woman and mother wanting to shift the blame for her ex’s illegal and obscene behaviour on to the victim?! She’s an utterly vile thing.

  6. Tourmaline says:

    Fergie—-Pure class ain’t she?

    And to be petty I hope this is the end of hearing about Princess Eugenie’s Anti-Slavery Collective human trafficking charity. The Yorks like to ram it down our throats that they are in total solidarity as a family, so until she cops to the fact that at a minimum her parents were friends with a sex trafficker (two at least actually, including Ghislaine whom Andrew met with at BP just a few months ago!) I don’t want to hear of her campaigning. It smacks of image burnishing for her family and is gross.

    • Mignionette says:

      Very good point. I notice the Fail and other shitty rags are not drawing our attention to this hypocrisy of Eugenie being the co-founder of the anti-slavery collective whilst her day is raping trafficked girls aka children.

      • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

        Wondering: Did Eugenie help start this charity IN RESPONSE/BECAUSE of her parents’ connection to Epstein? I mean, on some level, subconscious or not, she HAD to have known/heard about what Epstein was doing, esp. after his convictions around 2002, and the jail time in 2010? These girls were ON THE LOLITA EXPRESS PLANE, and they VACATIONED on Epstein’s island with their parents. Even though they were kids at *that* time, as they grew up (and now being adults), and they could read a paper/computer, they HAVE TO KNOW about their parents’ connections (money “loans” for Freeloader, girls for Pedo). Epstein was invited to Bea’s Ball (wasn’t it her 18th Bday?), and palace parties!

        While it is something that truly NEEDS attention drawn to it, how could Eug think it was a good idea for HER to start this charity, with those “connections” to Epstein? She had to know people would connect the dots at some point.

      • RoyalBlue says:

        And I thought she decided to associate with the charity as a sort of penance for what her father did. So yes, her dad was associated with this but she is trying to make the wrong right. But it is just backfiring spectacularly.

      • Tourmaline says:

        @(TheOG), if she HASN’T heard of Epstein then she is too dumb to be allowed to operate any kind of philanthropic endeavor. Of course it is no coincidence. I’m sure her taking on this cause was something discussed with her parents. The target audience for support is probably the very posh crowd Eugenie runs with, people like Misha Nonoo who promotes herself as a green, sustainable ethical fashion brand while married to an oil heir and inviting Jared and Ivanka to her wedding.

        It’s a way to launder the York name, reminds me of how on Newsnight the Duke of York used his patronage of a child abuse charity to shield himself from claims that he should have noticed something was wrong in Epstein’s world.

        I don’t feel bad about going after Eugenie for this because if her family is going to go viciously after a woman who was trafficked as a girl, I don’t want to hear more whining about how the Prince Andrew debacle is delaying the launch of Eugenie’s anti-trafficking podcast FFS.

    • Nic919 says:

      I agree about Eugenie staying away from that topic. We’ve known about Andy and fergie’s connection to Epstein for years so to pretend she was unaware of this and it was just a coincidence is unbelievable.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        “I agree about Eugenie staying away from that topic.”

        @Nic919, I think the reason Eugenie is staying away from this mess is 100% due to Jack Brooksbank. Mr. Brooksbank is not stupid and he understand PR.

        Jack has access to some of the best PR and legal advice in the world through his contacts and company, Casamigos, which is owned by………..George Clooney and Randy Gerber. It “ain’t” that hard to figure out. LOL! LOL!

  7. Darla says:

    Well, I never had any sympathy for her, but now she’s shown herself to be true filth. I tell you, this entire family, the BRF I refer to here, are garbage. How the British people tolerate these low iq inbreds is a real mystery to me.

    • minx says:

      I have no idea why anyone would bow to these people, support them, defer to them, anything. They are expensive, useless and immoral.

  8. Erinn says:

    Hmm. December 2010 – supposedly Andrew was walking with Epstein in Central Park, while negotiating money with Epstein for HER debts.

    March 2011 – it was admitted that he had given them money for those debts. This was the same year where he was listed as a level 3 offender.

    Now why oh why would Sarah be sooooo invested in attacking a victim. Hmmm… hmmmmm…..

    • Tourmaline says:

      When Palm Beach police raided Epstein’s villa in 2005 they found phone message pads with many messages arranging a steady stream of minors to come to the house for their shifts. They also found phone messages saying “HRH Duchess of York is awaiting your call”. She was part of this scene as well.

    • PrincessK says:

      I can never understand why Fergie was supposed to be in so much debt all the time, what was she spending money on? What was she doing? Most of her gallivanting around was at the expense of other people.

      I am inclined to think that she was a front for Andrew and he was the one living beyond his means in Royal Lodge and supporting his Princess daughters. Rumour has it that Edward doesn’t find it easy to make ends meet either. These large properties are costly to run and require staff.

  9. Frida_K says:

    Well, I hope that Sarah Ferguson gets pilloried, so there’s that.

    And that she and Pedo Andy don’t get a moment of peace nor another payout from the BRF trough ever again.

    She’s the one who deserves to get drilled, really. What about that money Epstein gave her? And her friendship with Epstein and Maxwell? Granted, she’s a nonentity in the BRF but she is such an avid grifter and suck-up that she begs for her place in the stocks. So someone should give it to her.

    Word of the day: pillory.

  10. mynameistaken says:

    “Drilled”?? Fergie, I think you mean grilled. I thought Andy was the thick one!

    • HMC says:

      I think she meant drilled. As in coerced into changing her story to exonerate Pedo Prince McRapey by repeated attacks etc

      • carmen says:

        I think of “drilled” as in trying to “drill” something through your head when you’re not getting it. Grilled is questioning someone.

    • Lorelei says:

      Right? “Drilled” sounds like something Ron Burgundy would say in this context. JFC this woman is unbelievable.

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      Yes, poor choice of words. REALLY poor choice of words.

    • sue denim says:

      when you think about what a drill does, it’s also a horrible but revealing freudian slip, she knows who he is…

  11. Snap Happy says:

    What inconsistencies? She’s (Virginia) been pretty straight forward and consistent in her story against Andrew. I also read an article that said Virginia was living quietly in Australia and a reporter approached her. She had the photo in an envelope of photos form that time period and didn’t even realize the significance of it.

  12. phlyfiremama says:

    Cornered rats. Besides saying “get rid of all the monarchy parasites”, that’s all I got.

  13. OriginalLala says:

    Pedy Andy did not “sleep” with Virginia, she was trafficked – he raped her.

  14. Lucy says:

    I bet Fergie is in a real panic because she’s been leeching of Prince Andrew for survival all her life. If his income & vanishes, so does hers. This is all just in the interest of her own survival because she thought she had a road back into the royal world with all its luxury and now it’s been pulled out from under her. She’s blaming everyone except the one who’s responsible for it in the first place- Randy Andy.

    • Lady D says:

      Mummy will make sure her favourite is comfortable for the rest of his life.

    • chitowngal says:

      THIS!

    • Chelle says:

      Yeah. Her position is totally self-serving. Stand by her man and access to her money. We get it, Sarah. We get it.

    • PrincessK says:

      I don’t think she is in any panic. She knows all the family secrets and I still believe that one day she will tell all for a big sum of money. Other members of the RF know that she needs to be kept close rather than loose. Fergie holds the cards in this.

  15. Sofia says:

    Fuck off Fergie

    • AnnaKist says:

      Hear, hear, Sofia. This woman and her ex prince are scum. I’d really love to drill her. With my Ryobi. Hammer drill.

      • Sofia says:

        Sorry for the crass language but I’ve absolutely had it with her grifter ass. I doubt she’s even that concerned with Andy’s innocence (okay she probably is since she’s still living with him and probably wants to marry him again) but instead is more worried about officially losing the royal adjacent lifestyle – for good this time

      • AnnaKist says:

        No need for an apology, Sofia. If you hadn’t said it, I would have. This pair of vile creatures are sickening. They really do deserve each other. Their daughters will be embarrassed by the parents’ disgusting behaviour, I’m sure.

    • Mrs. Peel says:

      Thank you Sofia – you read my mind.

    • My3cents says:

      This. I only hope that now that she opened her stupid mouth the press will tear into her and her many shady dealings.

  16. Jessica says:

    Sarah Ferguson is a sleazy slimeball just like Prince Andrew and always has been. They are extremely entitled people and huge grifters who have absolutely no standards about the people they associate with as long as money is involved. I feel sorry for their daughters. Didn’t Fergie leech off of them too (from the money their great-grandmother left to them in a trust)? They used that money to help her pay debts she accumulated from the extravagant lifestyle she insists on leading?

    She absolutely should answer for the “loan” she took from Epstein, though it wouldn’t surprise me if she’s hit up most of the wealthy people she knows for money at one time or another.

    • Tigerlily says:

      Fergie is descended from Charles II and one of his ho’s. CII married most of his ba$tards into the aristocracy so many many descendants. Perhaps Fergs feels that this ‘entitles’ her. *eyeroll*. Fed up with these grifters who through accident of birth fell entitled. Perhaps she needs to be grilled about her money.

    • Tourmaline says:

      Fergie didn’t really have an extravagant upbringing – she wasn’t working class or anything, her dad was the royal’s polo manager but she wasn’t rich. I speculate that when pre-Andrew she became the long-term girlfriend of Paddy McNally a very wealthy older businessman and started living with him in Verbier she took to the jetset life like a duck to water and has been loathe to give that up ever since. Even when she was still married to Andrew she was unable to conform her spending to any reasonable budget.

      It’s convenient now for her that her daughters run with a very fabulous circle of people (hat tip to Jill Zarin from Real Housewives of New York). The Roman Abramovich yacht vacays, Bransons, pop stars and other celebrity friends, Fergie must be elated at some of the friendships her daughters have.

  17. emmy says:

    She’s such an asshole. And this is why I don’t subscribe to the idea that we should leave the women who are married to these men or support them silently alone. She is just dumber than the rest of them please don’t yell at me, I know there are degrees and gray areas). But very often you are the company you keep and she is proof.

    • Christina says:

      Emmy, you are correct. In most cases, the wives are abused just as mush as the victims, but Fergie felt entitled to royal life because of her daughters. This wasn’t about an abused spouse unable to afford to fight back. She was divorced and just didn’t want to have to work for a living like a commoner, and Andrew was fine with it because he could do what he wanted. They ended up in theIr version of a perfect open marriage, unmarried.

      We all bleed the same blood, no matter how much bluer that one thinks their blood is. She’s more than an idiot. She is a social climbing opportunist who is working to protect her meal ticket/piggy bank at all costs, regardless of how it effects her children. I worry that the York Princesses have their parents’ morals. We won’t know until 10-20 years from now when they feel like they can be who they really are. I sure hope not.

  18. Jerusha says:

    Crass.

  19. Sam Louise says:

    Fergie and Andrew really are perfect for each other aren’t they? Two entitled, pompous assholes who have never done a day’s work and continue to sponge off of others. They make me nauseous.

  20. Nev says:

    Soon we won’t hear from both of them anymore. For sure when Prince Charles is in charge.

    • Original Jenns says:

      This is why I hope the monarchy lasts until at least he’s had a chance to complete clean house. Toss them all off, if not with judicial justice, then at least living the rest of their lives in humiliation. Although I imagine there’s some sort of justice in having the royal house of colonialism be brought down by a Queen and a Prince who hold nothing more dear than the crown and privilege.

  21. Bex says:

    She can fuck right off. The whole royal family can tbh. I’ve always wanted to see the monarchy gone but this is the first time in many years where it’s felt like that sentiment is gaining new ground here.

  22. lobstah says:

    I recommend the podcast The Mysterious Mr. Epstein – although it’ll make your blood boil. I didn’t realize the depths of his lifestyle and pedophilia, and the fact that he was close with EVERYBODY. I want to know where the heat is for Bill Gates….Bill Clinton…Elon Musk…Donald Trump…I’m sure there are more names, I’m just halfway through the podcast.

    • Pearlime says:

      I stumbled over that podcast a few weeks ago and can recommend it!
      The good thing about about all the Andrew stories, as insane and weird as some of them are, is that it keeps the Epstein case in the news – and you can be sure that there are a lot of people who were hoping that between the impeachment hearings in the US and the GE in Britain that story would slowly disappear from the headlines.

      • Tourmaline says:

        Good point and there are SO many others besides Andrew that are implicated and complicit in the whole Epstein operation. Some celeb names and many other names of rich and powerful that may not be instantly recognizable.

        I had forgotten that at the same party Andrew attended for jailbird Epstein in NYC in 2010, other guests included Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, Chelsea Handler and… Woody Allen.

  23. Charfromdarock says:

    The words I want to say would get me banned here.

    I hope it all comes crashing down on them and both her andPrince Pedo are “drilled” by investigators.

  24. Mumbles says:

    This loser is so hard up for easy money she gets paid to attend parties for tacky rich idiots who want to be royal-adjacent for an hour or two. (She did one last summer in Massachusetts).

    As for her attack on Virginia Roberts – her account has been deemed credible for years and there’s photographic proof of the meeting that Andrew denied for years (even recently he was all, a-humina humina that doesn’t look like my arm).

    In retrospect, their marriage made perfect sense. He was probably always a scumbag (spoiled by his mother) and found a woman so desperate for attention and social status that she would look the other way. Had she not been photographed getting her toes sucked, causing Phillip to hit the roof, they’d still be married now. Andy didn’t care about that crap.

  25. Nic919 says:

    The FBI can question Fergie anytime now.

    • SRB says:

      Indeed. Not a drop of diplomatic immunity for her thirsty ass.

      • GreenGirl says:

        If she’s questioned, I’d be curious to see if she sings like a canary to save herself. I think her royalty only runs so deep.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      And I think they will, she’s in it up to her eyeballs and is likely one of the reasons she desperate to get back into the RF fold – she needs their protection and money to pay for lawyers.

      This freeloader doth protest too much!!

    • Original Jenns says:

      Yes! That vile creature deserves to feel every bit as much fear as her ex husband’s victims. Someone said “cornered rats” and I completely agree. My only response to her is How. Dare. You.

  26. Gil says:

    What the actual “f”? Virginia was a child and sex trafficking victim. The one that need to be held accountable is Fergie, everybody is forgetting about the fact that she got “loans” from Epstein. Why no one is taking about that?

  27. Lucylee says:

    Aren’t Bea and Eugenie listed in the flight logs of the Lolita Express on a flight to the island?
    Randy getting 2% kickback from pitch@palace is a disgrace, if true.
    Sarah and Andrew run an extortion racket. Keep digging and all will be revealed.

  28. Jamie says:

    Prince Phillip is looking like a smart man now, having wanted her kept away from the rest of the family.

    • HK9 says:

      I was just coming to say the same. I still can’t believe this woman has made me actually agree with Prince Philip so early in the morning.

    • Lady D says:

      Too bad he didn’t feel the same way about the #pedointhepalace.

      • (TheOG)@Jan90067 says:

        PP’s ONLY credo was to keep it/all private. He’s just pissed that Pedo’s in the news, and that it’s affecting TRF.

        While we have no proof of his antics in his “Lunch Club”, it was the place where he and his friends “entertained” women. You can be sure there were some women there who were underage, or not entirely “happy” to be there with those geezers.

    • kerwood says:

      I’ve been thinking the same thing. Who knew that crusty, racist Prince Phillip is the best judge of character in the royal family? It appears that HE likes Meghan too. The loss of Phillip as a support and advisor has left the Queen vulnerable and her sex offender son has taken advantage of the situation and of her.

    • A says:

      Phillip only hated Sarah because she was indiscreet. If she’d done her toe-sucking in a place where no one could have photographed it, then she’d have been perfectly fine, and likely still married into the family. The only thing the royals ever care about is discretion. They don’t actually care about the criminality of the act in question, ever. We got a confirmation of that last week in that article where it stated quite plainly that Charles is angry, not because of what Andrew did, but because it all became so public.

      • Nic919 says:

        They didn’t like Fergie because she was indiscreet and they didn’t like that Diana was not going to silently put up with the affair. They haven’t changed except now the silent ones get RFOs and Victorian Orders. They don’t actually care about someone committing crimes, just that they are too public about it.

      • Lisabella says:

        I’d like the press to “drill” Fergie why she needed to have her damn toes sucked by that balding dude, whose buddy was sent to prison… Fergie’s a piece of SHIT.

    • PrincessK says:

      I have nothing good to say about Philip. I think the real reason he wanted her out of his sight was because he had an affair with her mother.

  29. Valiantly Varnished says:

    I think Fergie should be drilled on the money she borrowed from Epstein. You know, Prince Phillip is a racist old goat – but one thing he was ALWAYS right about is that Fergie is trash. It’s just that his son is too so they were and are a perfect match.

  30. Jen says:

    I really think that Fergie, The Queen, basically any one who defends Andrew thinks that 17 year olds are fair game and it was “consensual.” Too many people don’t understand that a 17 year old cannot legally consent. And a trafficked 17 year old at that! These people are all disgusting.

    But by all means, let’s continue to smear Meghan because she and Harry didn’t release the names of Archie’s godparents.

    • Rapunzel says:

      DM is crowing about Meg’s awful fitting shoes this morning. From her engagement photos. Cause priorities, right?

      • HK9 says:

        You’ve got to be kidding me…. they’re ridiculous.

      • Lady D says:

        The shoes she wore over two years ago are a problem now? Desperate to print her name or what?

      • Rapunzel says:

        LadyD- it’s some article about how Meg’s too big engagement shoes were voted one of the worst celebrity fashion fauxpas of the decade, along with that floral bedspread Kim K. once wore to the Met Gala.

        The gross headline is “A fashion foot wrong! Meghan Markle’s ‘oversized’ shoes at her engagement shoot and Kim Kardashian’s floral frock disaster are voted top fails of the decade”

        Really?? Heels with a bit of room in the back for swelling are one of the top fails? Or the freaking decade? Way too many folks drinking the Haterade.

  31. Eliza says:

    I don’t know about Prince Andrew, but i believe this woman lied about sleeping with lawyer Alan Dershovitz. Read about the case. She also accused Al Gore and other famous people. She’s not credible at all.

    • A says:

      I think you need to read up more on Alan Dershowitz first. The man repeatedly goes out of his way to defend known sex offenders like Harvey Weinstein. Then there’s the fact that there are multiple students of his from the law school he teaches at who have attested that his favourite obsession in class talking at length about how women falsely accuse men of rape, even though the actual numbers of this happening are quite low in reality. He’s been associated with Epstein for a long time as well. I think her accusations are perfectly credible, and at the very least, she deserves her day in court without being discounted as a liar from the very start.

      • Lady D says:

        The police dept. of Kelowna, the biggest city in the BC Interior is being investigated for tossing 40% of the sexual assault cases reported to them last year. The 40% ‘did not merit further investigation’ apparently.

  32. Deanne says:

    Fergie can go rot in hell.

  33. Rosa says:

    This whole episode sheds light on why Phillip has always hated her and why Charles has been quietly trying for years to get Andrew out…
    I also think that Fergie and Andrew are the actual reason why Eugenie and Beatrice have been sidelined for so long despite being useful to the Queen. You cannot have them with Andrew and Fergie popping up….

  34. Mrs. Peel says:

    Andy, Fergie and their girls are all complicit – if cancel culture does it’s proper job, we’ve seen and heard the last from all of them.

  35. Whatever says:

    Wasn’t Virginia’s interview filmed before Andrew’s interview but airing after his? How does Fergie think Virginia can be ‘drilled’ if the interview happened weeks ago?

  36. Pat says:

    Andrew already drilled her when she was 17. What a couple of savages. Why does Sarah even get an audience?

  37. Andrea says:

    Lots of questions….are they together? Is she self preserving because of loans and her daughters? Did she Not know about Epstein??

  38. Coco says:

    How about Fergie and Andrew drill to the center of the Earth and stay there?

  39. A says:

    How abt good old Fergie Ferg comesout and does a similar interview about an in-depth look into her finances and who paid off which of her debts. I feel like that’s a relevant topic worthy of discussion, no? How abt it Fergie?

    The audacity and entitlement of these people disgust me. The fact that grift on this scale, this LEVEL, went without anywhere close to the amount of discussion devoted to asking whether Meghan Markle is responsible for ruining the RF by eating avocados shows just how venal and disgustingly corrupt the tabloid press is in Britain. Good god. Just. Wow.

    • Tourmaline says:

      I would love to see Fergie go head-to-head with Emily Maitlis! Anytime Fergs, we’d love to hear from you in-depth!

      Or maybe a rematch with this Australian interviewer from 60 Minutes who recounts a past interview with Fergie when she stormed off because she didn’t appreciate being questioned, as one is, during an interview. For all her, I’m just a regular down to earth woman, schtick, she is as high-handed and arrogant as they come.
      https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/channel-7-presenter-michael-usher-recalls-trainwreck-interview-with-royal/news-story/6cda784eda03e4120692ef8e656aecc9

      • A says:

        Fergie is an excellent example, among countless others, as to why if the monarchy is abolished, the entire system of the aristocracy and all of their aristocratic adjacent satellites also need to get scrapped, period. There are so many posh people who think and behave exactly like Fergie. Revoke all their trust funds, put the money into a pile along with whatever we get from cancelling the RF, and make them get real jobs, not one where they’re working at the latest health food startup that barely makes it past 3 years.

  40. Stacy Dresden says:

    Wow. Evil.

  41. adastraperaspera says:

    Andrew’s demotion means Fergie’s meal ticket is in jeopardy, so the claws are out. And she should stop pretending the evidence against Andrew is going to be litigated in the media. I think it’s clearly heading to court. She’s just working the newspapers to control a message that’s already far out of their control. I think Andrew may cut a deal for immunity, by giving up info about all his mob buddies. I wonder if authorities suspect he sold national secrets for cash?

    • Giddy says:

      Fergie must be in a panic over money. I guess her only play now is to loudly support Andy, hoping he will keep supporting her financially. I sincerely wish they would both go away…far away, and never be heard from again.

  42. Liz version 700 says:

    I get her desperation, all those years of grifting blowing up must be awful for her …..but she is a vile awful arrogant waste of space. No compassion, no empathy. She and Andrew are perfect for each other….The Duke and Duchess of Hell.

  43. The Recluse says:

    A little public shame from people on the street would be nice for both Fergie and Andy.

  44. RedWeatherTiger says:

    Fergie’s vision of being re-accepted into the “loving” arms and coffers of the BRF after Philip passes on has been smashed all over the ground like a rotten pumpkin.

    She’s vile.

  45. Ruyana says:

    I’m old and Sarah Ferguson has always come across and completely classless and crass. I would expect they found her on a bar stool.

    • Gabby says:

      I’m old too, and I still remember what a spectacle she always made of herself starting right on her wedding day, winking and waving her way up the aisle like the main attraction at a strip club. Trash from day one.

  46. Mar says:

    Her and her husband are really ugly inside and out

  47. L4frimaire says:

    Well she just exposed herself there. What about her experience with Epstein, since she took his money. Why did she and Andy allow him around their then teenage daughters? She has proved she’ll literally sell access to the Royals so maybe she should just be quiet. Also, the interview was filmed before Andrews epic screw up, so the chips will fall where they will.

  48. ans says:

    she is so NOT fergilicious

  49. RR says:

    Ohhhh lawwwd!!! How can they all be so terrible at PR???? You’d think she would be keeping her mouth shut at this point.

    Wish I could tell her she’s already been drilled several times by “your boy” heh, thats the whole bloody problem now isn’t it!!!!

  50. Lala11_7 says:

    How is Ghislaine Maxwell not being drug for filth and being brought up on charges? WHO IS PROTECTING THAT?!?

  51. Anon says:

    Bea and Eug stand no chance against these two awful parents. I hope Jack is being the voice of reason for Eug and that Edo will do the same for Bea (doubts on that one though)

    • Liz version 700 says:

      Bea and Eug would have been better off living with wolves. At least wolves take care of their own. These girls indeed never stood a chance.

  52. Nibbi says:

    Saying she wants a trafficking & rape victim to be “put on the rack”? To be “drilled”?
    Her language alone feels like a further violent offense.

    AND HOW MUCH MONEY WAS IT, AGAIN, THAT SHE WAS GIFTED BY EPSTEIN?

    Trash, sleaze, slime- end of story.

  53. J ferber says:

    She reminds me of trump, even that neither was voted in (popular vote, people). Vile, selfish bloodsuckers.

  54. SJR says:

    Dear Fergie,
    No one cares what you think, you idiot. Be quiet. You are only showing yourself to be a complete waste of time.

    We should toss Prince Andrew in jail after he gives up everything he knows to the FBI.
    Then Fergie should be shipped off to wherever will accept her.

    Away with the both of them.

  55. Rachael says:

    I always assumed they were divorced in name only – their relationship never ended, just the marriage.

    I’ll always remember, around the time of their wedding, the comedian Jo Brand was being interviewed and someone asked her about Andrew and Fergie. She said she didn’t give a toss mainly, but described them as being “thigh-slapping morons” and made for each other. Good judge of character, that Jo Brand.

    Anyway, isn’t Sarah always in debt? I mean getting into major debt could happen to anyone ONCE I suppose, but to continually be in debt and never learn a lesson?

    I’ve always thought the BRF would keep on keeping on, regardless of republican sentiment but this situation with Andrew has me wondering if their days are numbered. It is worse than the abdication of Edward VIII because that was just a breech of convention. This is association with criminal behaviour.

  56. Moonstone says:

    The Yorks are a mess. As are several of the other royal households. While Harry told Meghan at that first Christmas gathering that this was the family that she never had, it has turned out that they are no better than her bio family. Harry and Meghan are quite capable of forging a new extended family of their close friends, along with Archie and Doria. Happy Friendsgiving to them!

  57. CairinaCat says:

    So fergie got what 15k from Epstein. Why was she going to him for money.
    When not all that long after there was a 7.5 million remodel and they bought that swiss place.
    She was unable to get 15k from andy? And WHERE did he get the money to buy the property and the remodel

  58. Mignionette says:

    Side note but here in the UK a lot of TV shows have been having panel discussions on whether it’s time to abolish the monarchy. Whilst this is only chat shows for now, it is mainstay populist media and if that sentiment is allowed to fester and gain traction the RF are toast.

  59. Minxx says:

    I hope these poor excuses for parents do not throw their daughters under the bus in order to save daddy’s pedo ass! I used to feel some sympathy for Fergie back when she was married to Andrew but boy..was I wrong! She’d do anything for money and position. Anything..I feel for Bea and Eugenie.

  60. PrincessK says:

    Did the words ‘drill’ actually come from Fergie’s lips? These were things attributed to her friends. Why should anyone take things from the Sun as gospel truth, when we all know the lies they are capable of spinning.