PR experts can’t decide whether Duchess Meghan should go quiet or come back

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle continue their Australia/ New Zealand Tour

One of the things that has bugged me about Sussexit and the coverage – mostly from white journalists, many of whom have a larger agenda – is that many people are editing out one huge point about why the Sussexes went away. The conversation white journalists want to have is that the unrelenting spotlight of media and fame crushed the Duchess of Sussex, when… that was not the case. Meghan wanted to be famous. She had so much ambition for what she could do with her role. She enjoyed the spotlight and she’s a people-person who was entirely comfortable on walkabouts and dinners and cocktail parties and events where she had to shake hands for hours. No, it was the racism, misogyny and double-standards that got to her. She even said it to Tom Bradby: “I never thought this would be easy, but I thought it would be fair.”

I was reminded of the rapidly rewritten narrative as I read Vanessa Grigoriadis’ new piece for New York Magazine, “Meghan Markle’s Bigger Dreams: She isn’t letting the royal family get in her way.” It’s an interesting read, but the first part of the story is all about how Meghan was a hustling, ambitious actress who was eager for more media coverage pre-Harry, and then she was crushed under the royal spotlight and now she’s basically in hiding. Once again, if Meghan could have just been allowed to live her life as a massively popular royal woman and done her work, she would still be in England. Instead, her immediate popularity was seen as threatening and damaging to the monarchy/status quo, and the press and the palaces all worked to bring her down by any means necessary. Anyway, there are some interesting quotes and such from this piece, so here are some highlights:

The post-royal plan: Regardless of where Markle’s being photographed, no one thinks she’ll be content taking hikes for long. What she seems to want for herself is to become the next Oprah, or Michelle Obama, a new, more discreet Kim Kardashian West, but hopefully falling short of a postdivorce Ivana Trump, newly shorn of her golden position in ’80s New York and hawking branded Champagne glasses and baubles on QVC. In other words, what is sometimes called a “goodwill ambassador” but in other contexts a “brand ambassador” by a world that isn’t always so able to tell the difference.

Working with a Clintonista: For this quest, much effort has been put into securing a new court: In her time as a princess, Markle ran through many assistants, courtiers, and press officers and is now reportedly under the firm hand of the Sunshine Sachs firm and Sara Latham, a redheaded American political adviser. Latham is known to be smart, funny, and extremely competent. “Is she nice?,” I ask one of her former colleagues. “She can be,” she says. “People who know her love her.” Latham was John Podesta’s right hand and might be one of the only people who has worked on a presidential campaign (Hillary ’16) and in the White House (circa Bill), 10 Downing, and the British palace. “Sara has a serious pedigree, and she knows how to play the political game — she survived the Clinton orbit forever.”

Should they go away? The PR playbook for Meghan and Harry, says a specialist, is clear. “If I were them, I’d go away for a while,” she says. “They’re caught in a hurricane right now, and all the coverage is process and intrigue and gossip. They need to keep a low profile and let this news cycle exhaust itself.” When it does, she’d advise them to engage in an activity that can generate a unique series of new photos, rather than grant interviews and “tell their story” on Ellen or to Oprah. “They need to roll out a month or two from now with some ‘showing, not telling,’ and positive-leaning charity stuff. Whatever they’re going to do with themselves, they should go do that — go do some Africa and elephants, if that’s the plan. Then you feed the news with those images.”

But most PR experts agree that Meghan shouldn’t look to cash in with high-paying gigs in the near future: A high-level publicist agrees: “The plan has to be world domination, though I don’t think she’ll do a lot of commercial stuff for a while, because she wants to prove the British wrong that she’s just a brat and a gold digger.”

But some people think she needs to move fast: But whatever the advice she’s getting, she may want to be wary of waiting too long to sort out her new image — as any influencer knows, the time to monetize is always “now” and the drama of Megxit may dissipate sooner than you’d think. Royalty is forever, celebrity is not. “Our readers love Kate and the way she’s embraced being a princess,” says a tabloid insider. “On that front, she’s a much better actor than Meghan.”

[From New York Magazine]

LOL, “embraced being a princess.” This is all so loaded, and when I really think about all of the forces that lined up against Meghan, it makes me so angry. She was seen as so threatening to so many people. She was also seen as such an easy target – a biracial American divorcee, of course everyone already had their knives out. But it was so much more than that – Kate became the safe one, the one who “knew her place,” the one who would never really threaten the royal ecosystem. Meghan’s popularity, her work ethic, her politics and her mere existence threatened so much of that same ecosystem. Anyway. What’s next for Meg and Harry? Lord knows, but I’m sure she’s got a plan.

The Duke of Sussex and Duchess of Sussex watch the wheelchair basketball final in Australia

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

132 Responses to “PR experts can’t decide whether Duchess Meghan should go quiet or come back”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Escondista says:

    I think she and Harry should do what they want if it makes them happy.

  2. Becks1 says:

    Oh this article is petty and shady.

    She ran through many assistants and courtiers? She needs to prove she’s not a brat? People love the way Kate has embraced being a princess? Meaning, coatdress, tiaras, and no opinions? Ugh.

    I do think there is an attempt by the media to rewrite history about Meghan. Even Emily Andrews had some thing on twitter last night about how Meghan couldn’t handle the spotlight and her family made things worse, but she hopes they come back bc they were an asset to the UK or something. SURE JAN. She completely overlooked her own role in “Meghan not being able to handle the spotlight” and how the press sought out her family members repeatedly and gave them a microphone. Of course she wants them to come back. She loved writing hateful and false articles about them.

    Of course H&M are going to reappear in the spotlight and of course their first big public event post Sussexit is not going to be an interview with Ellen.

    • Sof says:

      I agree with you, plus, have you noticed how they try to erase her humanity? It’s all about the spotlight and her role, but they avoid to talk about her as a person. She quit her job, moved to a foreign country, newly wed and pregnant. That is not easy for regular people, if we add the press attacks and how she was punished for doing small everyday activies (like eating avocado on toast!)… it’s really upsetting.

      • Jumpingthesnark says:

        “Under the firm hand of sunshine Sachs” aaaaand…. the racist tropes continue, and the dehumanizing language, talking about her like she is a dog that needs obedience training🤢🤮

    • Nic919 says:

      Elizabeth Holmes was part of that thread going on about how Meghan was thirsty for fame (but totally not meant in a bad way😐) and the interaction with Emily Andrews was the most perfect example of how dangerous white feminism can be. Holmes was the one slagging Meghan about having binders during the Oceania tour, so she’s always been shady.

      • Becks1 says:

        YES! Holmes has been a huge part of the problem and that discussion with Emily Andrews was “funny” in that regard…..these two women acting like they played no role in Sussexit.

      • Hope says:

        Kate fans HATE Elizabeth Holmes because she isn’t 100% complimentary towards Kate. Holmes’ fame is due to So Many Thoughts on the royals so now she has to throw Meghan under the bus and get the Cambridge fans back on her side. She has a book to sell!

        Gary Janetti is the same. He backpedalled like crazy after the documentary last year, but he has a tv show to promote and Meghan is no longer a working royal so he’s back to hating her.

    • I completely agree with Kaiser’s read on all of this. And I agree with you Becks. It is very important to the senior royals to have this appear to be all about bad press in order to deflect from their own culpability. This article is nothing but a hatchet job, although I do agree with the PR specialist’s opinion on how the Sussexes should lay low and come out working hard. 🤯🤯🤯 Also, I hate, hate, hate it when any article or talking head brings Kim Kardashian into the same frame as Meghan. Kardashian became famous because she let herself be filmed letting a guy piss on her during sex. Then she and her mom worked that video to get her in the public eye. How anyone can see any similarity between Meghan and the KarTRASHians is beyond me.

      • AMM says:

        It’s not really the point, but I dont believe the sex tape actually had a pee scene. That was just a huge rumor before it was released to the public.

      • yinyang says:

        Xenophobes try to group outsiders togther, they either don’t see/don’t want to see there are rich, poor, educated, uneducated, good, bad, mild, aggressive people everywhere including in their own country, but they are blind to that.

    • Lou says:

      “On that front, she’s a much better actor than Meghan.” Wowwww, the shade!!!

  3. Em says:

    I worry that the longer they stay away, the harder it will be to re-enter public life in the way they want to. The whole machine (PR/media/BRF) will pounce into action at that time… and resume spinning that insidious racist narrative. I wonder if H+M are presently strategizing with their loyal group of friends (and wonderful Doria!) how to mitigate this differently, this time around?

    • Toot says:

      The British press are going to continue to do what they always do, and Harry and Meghan know that.

      They left because they didn’t want those folks at their engagements and and having to brief them ahead of time. Harry and Meghan never said they hate all press, just that they were done with the royal rota.

      They’ll come back, when ready and have the press their who they want

      • Silver Charm says:

        @Toot you touch on something I think is sometimes missed and that its not that they necessarily dislike the press and attention. Part of it, in my opinion, is that they couldnt control the narrative.

      • Ennie says:

        “Control the narrative”, that sounds er… controlling instead of seeking fairness. The coverage was almost totally biased, and seeing that it was only going to get worse (it did) , see how the press treated them about their child calling him animal names, a brat and demanding them to show him up or else.
        Gladly, they had other options than staying, but I wish they were granted the leniency Edward had when he married.

      • Toot says:

        Exactly Ennie. The British press was largely unfair. Not wanting the royal rota there is just limiting their money train not stopping any narrative.

      • Silver Charm says:

        Both can and are likely true: the British press are abusive and unfair and H&M want to (and are trying to) control the narrative.

      • pineapple says:

        Silver Charm …. you do know what went on right? Meghan was bashed by a racist press. Period. It is not any more complicated than that.

      • Silver Charm says:

        Yes pineapple I do and said as much.

    • Ali says:

      Actually it’s the opposite.

      The longer the Sussexes are away and focusing on themselves, the worse it is for the media.

      • Brit says:

        Yep. Stories aren’t getting the clicks like they used to. Canada is very protective of them and America is more on her side than anything. The BM is on the outside and they’re frustrated and scared.

      • morrigan01 says:

        Exactly this. The longer they stay quiet the more articles like this one show the RR and other mostly British Press for what they are. They’re gone, their quiet, but the RR and other BM can’t stop talking about them.

        It’s starting to sink into the RR and BM that Harry and Meghan aren’t coming back, and the longer they are quiet the more it’ll keep sinking in, and the more their profits from talking about them will keep drying up.

      • clomo says:

        What is the BM? Help me.

      • Feeshalori says:

        British media.

  4. Nina says:

    All of them don’t know meghan .Hsrbhas never spoke to them.I thought Harry and her were so so insignificant for the press and the monarchy???
    I don’t get the hundreds of piece all the white journalists are writing against that woman

  5. Nina says:

    And why the he’ll aren’t they writing about their white Princess Kate if she’s so popular and bankable?
    We all know she’s not

    • notasugarhere says:

      The Art Room isn’t the only one of Kate or William’s patronages that are failing, because having W&K as patrons doesn’t translate to an increase in donations or funding. They don’t do the work, and they aren’t interesting so they don’t bring in the clicks or donations.

    • What can you say about a life size cardboard cutout? She’s pretty, she has nice clothes, she has a nice smile, she’s the right color and weight, she knows how to keep her mouth shut and her brain disengaged.

      • pineapple says:

        You know what JA .. I don’t fault Will and Kate for not working. If the British people are okay with it? Not everyone is a work horse. I fault them for being petty and jealous and racist. I fault them for DECIDING NOT TO WORK and then getting all in a racist rile when someone else does. Like, put on your big boy and big girl panties and take some responsibility for your choices.

        Dear Lord these people need therapy.

    • Ennie says:

      It’s just like the commenters on instagram. the Sussexes have three or four times over the number of comments of the other (higher ranked) royal couple, with people who dislike them parked there complaining about them and how irrelevant they are. I don’t understand how they don’t go and boost the profile of their FFQ and FFK.
      Like one commenter said, they are so obsessed with Meghan, that they praise their favorite in the wrong page 🤦🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

  6. HK9 says:

    Those PR “experts” should leave Megan & Harry alone and offer their services to the RF since their the ones who can’t seem to get it together.

  7. Nev says:

    Hahahaha this is what happens when you do a PEACE OUT. All the speculation. Hahaha

  8. Jane says:

    “Go do some Africa”???? Seriously???

    • Krista says:

      Right??? OMG my eyebrows almost shot up off my forehead at that one….

    • Thanks for that Jane. I got that too. Everyone still wants Meghan to “go back to Africa.” I hated that bullshit racist attitude during the sixties civil rights movement and I still hate it.

      • Guest2.0 says:

        And to show how ignorant that “back to Africa” nonsense is, the majority of African American’s ancestry dates back to at least to the 1700s. AA were here before/during the Revolutionary War and helped build America.

  9. Toot says:

    Meghan is doing exactly what she needs to do,so is Harry.These people don’t know Meghan and always have these narratives that when she acts is completely the opposite.

    Meghan has always said how she loves the outdoors and hasn’t lived in LA for over a decade, but supposedly is rushing back to LA. I see them having a house in Cali, but it won’t be their base.

    • L4frimaire says:

      This is a bit random but how is it that neither Meghan nor a Harry have their own home somewhere, even as an investment? Usually when an actor gets those first big checks, they buy a house for themselves or their parents. I’m surprised she never bought a condo or house in Toronto or LA as an investment. I assume Harry has a bit of his own cash, but no holiday home in Europe or English countryside? It just seems weird, especially at their age.

      • She and her ex-husband had a home in LA. She sold her Toronto home when she got married. They have a home in England — Frogmore Cottage. I’m truly believe they will have another home in Canada or wherever; but perhaps wait to determine where until after their lives settle down.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Harry was in the military for 10 years. Why buy a house when all you’re doing is crashing occasionally in London when you’re in the UK and not in the barracks? Plus, as the plan was always for Harry to be a working royal? No point in purchasing private property, about which people would complain (security costs).

      • Redgrl says:

        @JA – I thought she rented her house in Toronto ?

      • Lady D says:

        I thought she was renting in Toronto, JA?

      • L4frimaire says:

        The LA house with ex- hubby was rented ( was sold by the owner, not them), as was the Toronto house. Just surprised since for Americans, home ownership is a big deal, drilled into us as a way to build wealth, etc. As for Royals, maybe they just take stuff like that for granted since they live in such a bubble of privilege and wealth, with so many properties at their disposal. Can’t imagine any of them taking out a mortgage, they barely handle cash.

      • notasugarhere says:

        They don’t all have outside homes. Edward and Sophie do not. Andrew has the shady Swiss chalet, Anne has the private home fixed up with taxpayer money. Princess Alexandra, Duke of Kent, Prince and Princess Michael of Kent do not have outside homes. P&P Michael used to, but sold it in the face of the freebie KP space scandal. The Gloucesters do have a private estate but currently rent it out. They’re the line with private money vs. the Kent line.

  10. DS9 says:

    It’s obvious to anyone with sense that Meghan viewed her luck in finding her perfect partner as an opportunity to do meaningful charity work. She gave not just coverage but viable, useful, far reaching, long term financial assistance to her patronages and involved the public in those efforts.

    I know we don’t like to compare the duchesses but if anyone latched on to gain the most from the glamour of the royal family while doing the least in return, it’s Kate who is out of pocket more often than not, is often on vacation, now has access to all the jewels and needs 2 weeks in Mustique to recover if she shakes too many hands in rapid succession.

    • tempest prognosticator says:

      “I know we don’t like to compare the duchesses…” Thanks for the chuckle.

  11. Ali says:

    The media are dying over the lack of Meghan and Harry leaks.

    • Brit says:

      Camilla Tominey had an article about Meghan going into politics, which I really doubt and basically admitted to stalking their Instagram page 😂. The Australian media had a Queen impersonator talking about Harry and Meghan. The BM clearly wants them back to get their checks and revenue up. All of them literally bit the handed the hand the fed them and they don’t know what to do.

      • L4frimaire says:

        Does she mean American politics? Has she not been paying any attention to the mess in Iowa and the impeachment debacle with Trump? Sure, can see Meghan and Harry at steak frys in Iowa, walking the precincts. Where do these people get this stuff from.

  12. Lili says:

    Actually this Article is a bit shady but the question it asks are valid. How long to wait how to reappear.. anyone agrees?

    • lanne says:

      Nope. They have to do things on their schedule. They don’t owe the public any appearances anymore. They are no longer working royals. They stopped using HRH and gave up public money. They are private citizens who will reveal the scope of their public role on their own terms in their own time.

    • Lili / Liriel —. I agree with NotASugarHere. — using to user names is SHADY.

      • MerryGirl says:

        LOL, another on caught using 2 user names, and it’s usually the ones who dislike Meghan or question her moves

      • Olenna says:

        @JA and MerryGirl, this made me laugh, too. Some of these people are so busy hate-stalking every gossip, royal blog and SM site, they forget what handle or nickname they’re using. They have no shame and take the rest of us for idiots.

  13. Sofia says:

    It seems people want to create two different narratives on Meghan and they can’t decide which one to pick.

    Is she a narcissistic master manipulator who stalked and plotted on Harry, knew EXACTLY what she was signing up for when she joined the BRF and is controlling the events and is basically in charge of everything and everyone including Harry

    Or (like Emily A was going on about last night) is she some dumb naive woman who had no idea what the royal family was like, overestimated the spotlight, is being throw into exile by the Queen and basically has no idea what to do now and is miserable at home

    Which is it because she can’t be both narratives at the same time. She can’t be dumb yet some sort of Machiavellian schemer. She can’t be naive yet knew exactly what the BRF was like. She can’t have been overwhelmed by the spotlight yet a narcissistic attention seeker

    • Shirleygailgal says:

      @Sofia….of course she can, you silly! They have to write out of both sides of their brains because they have NOTHING.
      Whatever they decide, I bet it’s a fully formed idea before being revealed. I see the Telegraph, which I thought was a pretty reliable, unbiased newspaper, has been piling on and
      I’m beginning to feel done with this world.
      Angry at the States
      Angry at the Queen, angry at the royal ricotta (aka the Cartel)
      Angry at the Chinese who are holding two Cdn citizens in retaliation for the cushy (AND LEGAL) holding of one of their executives whilst our citizens are not allowed a lawyer or doctor.
      Angry, angry, angry at the 1%. Angry Bernie Madoff is even asking for early release.
      Angry at folks being mean and hurtful and ugly. Angry that whilst Riding the bus, I scooted over to be sure there was a spot for the woman approaching. I smiled up at her, she sat and I said Good Morning. She smiled, thanked me and said “I want to tell you I feel safe with you”. I’m so ANGRY she wouldn’t feel safe everywhere, or sitting anywhere. I’m angry all over, and I’m losing hope. F-U-C-K!!!

      • Scollins says:

        #1

      • Eliza says:

        The Telegraph has been nicknamed the “Torygraph” by the Private Eye for ages. It is a racist newspaper that panders to the far-right crowd. In the most recent election, the Telegraph fully supported Boris Johnson, a well-documented racist. He even wrote an article for the Telegraph in 2018 comparing Burka wearing women to ‘letterboxes’ and ‘bank robbers’.

      • Babz says:

        @Shirleygailgal, I think you could have been looking into my brain. I’m angry at so many of the same things. It’s exhausting. I try not to think about it too much, and am looking forward to our first Sussex sighting. It will seem like a reward after a long wait.

    • According to all of them she can be ALL things to all people as long as she is seen as a NEGATIVE in some way. It would seem Meghan is the Alpha and the Omega of the media and the royal family scapegoating.

  14. little bird says:

    i just read that article last night and it rubbed me completely the wrong way. i’m curious to see what she does next, and i think some of this may be right, but it subtly frames her ambition as sinister and that….. both feels and is wrong. also the implication that she wants to be an influencer,,, lol

    • SKF says:

      The article is revolting.

      And aside from all the awfulness about MM, WTF is the “is she nice?” question about Sara Latham??? They would NEVER ask that question about a man doing his job. What the hell kind of question is that?? So reductive.

  15. KellyRyan says:

    Meghan and Harry have a global audience and market. Royal Rota, a lesson from the Wizard of Oz, “I’m dying, I’m dying, I’m dying.” Loss of power over others, I’m laughing at the absurdity.

  16. lanne says:

    It’s Schrodinger’s Princess. She’s in a state of uncertainty until looked at by a RR. So Meghan is right now a) cowering in Canada away from a spotlight she couldn’t handle, and b) a conniving harpie exercising a master plan of conspiracy begun as a child (1st step dish soap commercials, then Buckingham Palace, then I’ll be queen of the world bwahahaha!) . Whichever RR looks at her solidifies her position (but just for the moment).

  17. Osty says:

    Isnt it ironic to see pple using Meghan’s name for money n fame but criticise her for maybe using her own name for fame n money. Anyways why are they focusing on the insignificant non working royals when the perfect pigeons have been out and about forcing their weird PDA in our faces ?

  18. Brit says:

    Harry and Meghan’s radio silence is killing the media especially in Britain and Australia. Everyone knows the Sussexes will be successful without the media or the royals and they’re mad because they will be missing out on the boatload of money that they used to make off their backs. As I said in another thread, the Royal rota and tabloids will probably try to get in their good graces by making public apologies aka like Emily Andrews did yesterday on twitter or they’ll try to follow them at events like the Invictus games despite not being invited because the royal coverage with the W&K and C&C ain’t cutting it. Meghan and Harry are unpredictable and all these so called predictions and articles aren’t saying much of anything.

    • Yeah, I saw Vicky Arbitor (sp?),one of the RR, in a video clip yesterday. She was bending over backwards to explain why Meghan has been horribly and unfairly targeted and is a real victim. Vicky is just so, so supportive NOW. I almost wanted to vomit. Remember Vicky, all of you have reported that Harry reads everything, keeps a list of who said what and when. That karma bus seems to be picking up a,lot of passengers.

      • lanne says:

        Victoria has consistently been a supporter of the Sussexes. She called out the nal polish and 1 shoulder dress double standards, and talked about racism. Her idiot father Dickie has said some nasty, shady stuff, but Victoria’s been good.

      • Olenna says:

        Victoria has NOT been a consistent supporter of Meghan, but I have neither the time nor inclination to dig up her shady sh8t as evidence. Her interviews, articles and tweets are out there in Twitterland and elsewhere for anyone who does, though. Maybe start with this TL on her defense of the BRF (rather the Sussexes) when the Crypt Keeper was in the hospital and work your way back through her tweets. https://twitter.com/victoriaarbiter/status/1209344127260749824

      • Thanks Lanne for the correction. — I must be confusing her with her father as to old comments. She was really positive in the clip I saw but thought she was about facing.

        Also, further up the thread. I thought Homes were owned in both Toronto and Canada — so to those commenters who corrected me, thanks. 🤹‍♀️

      • Tina says:

        I agree. Victoria ain’t crap! She told a lie by saying they would be safer in England b/c they were protected from the paps! Um, did she forget Harry won a lawsuit against SPLASH when they took private pics of their cotswald rented home?? That was pure invasion of privacy!! So no, Victoria is not one to be trusted!

      • Abena Asantewaa says:

        Victoria Arbiter, has always been a Meghan supporter, and is usually fair, unlike her father. I have read and heard everything she has said about Meghan. Eg, the famous one shoulder dress.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Vicky is not a Meghan supporter. She pretended to suck up for a bit, in an attempt to get herself her daddy’s kind of position with the Sussexes. Once they hired Latham, Arbiter started attacking openly.

  19. Mrs. Peel says:

    I hope they are relaxing in their Vancouver Island retreat, enjoying each other’s company, and goo goo gagaing the days away with Archie.

    • bamaborn says:

      Yes, Mrs Peel. And baby Archie is thriving knowing his parents put him above everything. Lucky little fella!

    • Redgrl says:

      And doing lots of yoga, walks on the beach, and eating lots of amazing fresh Vancouver Island seafood!

    • Babz says:

      My thoughts exactly! I like to think of them passing the days playing with Archie, walking the pups, working out their foundation, and spending quiet time with each other. You know, living life like most people get to do. The RRs can just pound sand and stop with the faux apologies. They had their chance with this couple, when they were given access, when they got their scoops and pictures – right up until they began the racist abuse and harassment. They blew it, and if they think they will get a second chance, they are delusional. They bit that Sussex hand really hard, and to paraphrase Hamilton – “they missed their shot,” in terms of getting another chance.

  20. Loretta says:

    I’m really hoping that Meghan will not come back in UK never again. They don’t deserve her and can be pressed forever.

    And LOL at “our readers love Kate and the way she’s embraced being a princess” yup those tabloid readers are xenophobic and racist, it’ normal that thay love the bland,white Duchess.

  21. heygingersnaps says:

    this new york magazine article is problematic as well and that’s due to the writer, so much projection. I won’t be surprised if the writer supports dump and his ilk.

    • GuestOne says:

      I think the writer of this article wrote the Vanity Fair hit piece where she interviewed Markle Senior’s other daughter so her credibility is nil to me.

      A lot of products popped up because of Meghan joining the royal family eg podcasts, Gary Janetti animated series coming soon, Elizabeth Holmes has a book coming out. Charles’ biographer who hates Meghan admitted they hadn’t seen this level of international attention since Diana. So these people who want her to come back ASAP are saying this out of self interest- they want new content. The royal reporters are lamenting because they bit the hand that feeds them& likely don’t have sources to say what they are up to next in Canada.

      The narratives around Meghan are so contradictory. They say she controls Harry but a royal reporter claims that Meghan wanted to do drinks reception with them pre Oceana tour but Harry nixed the idea. How can that be if what Meghan wants, Meghan gets?

      She’s always wanted fame – so why not do the hospital photocall when she had the baby? She would have had thousands of cameras on her. Why retreat from the royal family with more guaranteed press coverage?

      She wants positive press only- so why not give in to press demands& give access, do friendly Frogmore chat as Ingrid Seward/Arthur Edwards suggested to ensure friendlier press& that her profile improves?

      These changing narratives make my head spin but ultimately these people need to fill their columns& apparently the rest of the family aren’t cutting it.

  22. Flying fish says:

    The press British or otherwise are thirsty for Meghan and Harry. Once they return to public view it will be spotlighted all.

  23. Redgrl says:

    Why on earth ask of her PR person is nice? Or mention that she has red hair? Oh right- she’s a woman and no matter how much we are at the top of our game women still have to be “nice.” And the colour of her hair – oh right, redheads are fiery and temperamental and seductive/promiscuous bad girls – or whatever other idiotic patriarchal stereotype this idiotic reporter is pushing…

  24. BaronSamedi says:

    This reminds me so much of the way Hilary Clinton’s gets rewritten to this day. Yes, people actually rather voted for the Orange Fascist than make a woman President. It was sexism.

    What happened to Meghan was racism and I can’t journalists are pretzeling themselves to arrive at any other conclusion than the obvious one.

    • Hope says:

      At this point, I’m flat out not interested in what any white “experts” have to say about this. But at least when Ingrid Seward was peddling her nonsense on CBS and insisting there was no racism, the anchor asked any one who was black if they agreed with her.

  25. MA says:

    You know who wants to be famous? Bland, sorry-looking Holmes who somehow built a career off of slagging off a WOC despite have no taste, style, or appeal.

    I’m sick of White Feminists perpetuating this narrative that Meghan struggled under the royal spotlight. Meghan struggled under the unrelenting racist coverage and the emotional abuse inflicted by her father that was facilitated by the media. NO other royal, let alone royal bride, has EVER had to deal with that. Put any of these self-righteous basic Beckys in the same position and they’d crumble.

    • kerwood says:

      @MA, it’s the standard ‘blame the victim’ play. If enough people say that Meghan is responsible for the hateful abuse she (and her child) endured, not only can they diminish it, they can keep doing it, which is what they REALLY want.

  26. BendyWindy says:

    “When she was a princess…”

    She’s still a princess, and a duchess, and a member of the royal family. That doesn’t disappear because they’re non-working royals and live in Canada.

  27. LTA says:

    This NY Magazine piece gave me really strong shades of the awful “Priyanka is a scammer” piece that was promptly pulled from site. It’s not as extreme, obviously, but the projection on the part of the author, with the almost complete lack of sourcing and the anecdotal evidence of “I heard from friends that she wanted to meet a tech millionaire” seems both needlessly judgmental and humble-braggy (“I’m SO in the know, I have friends who know Meghan!”)

    And honestly…if you are familiar with Grigoriadis’ work, this is not surprising. She did a podcast on Ivanka last year, which I was super excited about, because obviously I relish in any opportunity to take Ivanka down a peg. But so much of the podcast was SO loaded, Grigoriadis made so many mentions of the fact that she grew up in the same circles as Ivanka, has met Ivanka, has met her mom at society dinner parties, etc. Obviously a podcast like that is inherently subjective, and I was listening to it because I WANTED to hear trash about Ivanka…but the self-indulgent exercise of the project made it really hard for me to enjoy or take seriously.

    And THEN take into account that Grigoriadis wrote that weird profile of Madonna recently, and she’s the interviewer that Nicki Minaj walked out on (and trust me, I’m no Minaj fan)…it would seem that this writer isn’t good enough at her job to justify all these high profile assignments. Unless her editors just see her value in clickbait, in which case…mission accomplished.

    • GuestOne says:

      This writer wrote the VF article about the Markle family breakdown. Anyone who saw the vindictive money grabbing Markles& tried to sympathise is scum to me.

      I didn’t click on the piece but a jab about assistants leaving again shows lack of credibility but also how much the smears have carried as they were in mainstream media. I remember even the Times reported on their private secretary from BP being temporary& then when the smear campaign started the Times switched to suggest that leaving was proof of Meghan being an awful diva- even though she didn’t leave for months after their reporting and stayed beyond initial term. Truly low.

      @Kerwood you make a great point. When the Sussexes left a lot of people who weren’t following the story saw the racist/unfair treatment of Meghan from some sections of the press for the first time including internationally& they’ve been called out for it. So yes some revisionism/gaslighting going on to suggest Meghan was too weak to handle ‘scrutiny’ (aka abuse/bullying).

      • Isn’t it amazing how all the Sussexes’ employees only work for Meghan according to the press? Seems the royal family and the press have GHOSTED Harry from the marriage.

  28. kerwood says:

    The media is covering its collective ass. Even the most highbrow publications were complicit in the racist media abuse of the Sussexes. People who had never even heard of the Daily Mail read or heard about stories FROM the Daily Mail. CNN covered stories started by the racist British tabloids without a single ‘consider the source’. Now they’re doing what abusers ALWAYS do. They’re blaming the victim.

    • Hope says:

      The media will never admit it’s own complictness. Exploiting the racism and feeding it was an easy way for them to get viewers. Here, they have the temerity to insist that Meghan has to prove she’s not a brat because she set boundaries against their abuse.

  29. Sass says:

    All this article is to me is garbage. From the title of the piece on down. “Go do some Africa”? “She has to prove she’s not a brat”? And the unoriginal insult of saying she wants to be anything like the Kardashians. 🙄 Meghan and Harry are a team, they are going to work together with the people they’ve hired to develop a smart plan that will not only make them look good but also have a positive impact on the world. Like they’ve always done.

  30. knowitall says:

    “Latham was John Podesta’s right hand.” Well there you have it. Yes, there is racism. Yes, they are victims. I’m sure I’ll get roasted here, but they are also ill advised. They brought an American on board with multiple failed campaigns under her belt to turn around British media? Not to mention her role in the corruption of the DNC and a rigged primary. I’m also not the biggest fan of Mulroney who does seem to play a key role. I hope Sunshine Sachs can turn it around for them. And no, they should NOT go away right now, which is coincidentally what Hillary did after the campaign. Should be business as usual. Latham is not doing them any favors, sorry.

    • notasugarhere says:

      ‘knowitall’, Latham has dual US/UK citizenship with years of experience working in both US and UK politics and business.

      • knowitall says:

        Years of experience like picking Tim Kaine? British or not, experience and success are two different things, especially in politics where having good instincts means everything.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Again, pointing out that you clearly don’t knowitall about Latham. But keep paddling.

    • Dear NotASugarHere. — I love your feisty responses! You go girl. 💃🏻

  31. Hope says:

    “On that front, she’s a much better actor than Meghan.”

    That’s a quote from the current US Weekly cover on Kate. I know that because I just read it yesterday in the supermarket checkout line (I’m not spending money on that nonsense).

    “Tabloid insider” LOL

    If this is the kind of source used by the author, it doesn’t matter that it’s NY Magazine. This article is worthless. Awful though, the way the baseless tabloids are legitimized by publications you’d think would be more credible.

  32. TheOriginalMia says:

    I stopped reading those quotes after they said she wanted to be a more discreet Kim Kardashian. GTFOH with this mess! She was trying to be herself. She was trying to work for the damn BRF and couldn’t do that because of racism, jealousy, misogyny, and nationalism.

  33. L4frimaire says:

    I read the article and while some valid questions, the tone was very snarky, like Meghan just wants to be famous for being famous. Like what does that even mean, and what does being an influencer mean for someone with their platform? She’s one of the most famous women in the world right now. There is a resentment in the tone for sure. Also, some of these articles seem to ignore the last three years of their lives, the news coverage from the British media, the inaccuracies and just the whole feeding frenzy of it all, especially around the time leading to Archies birth. The writer fails to mention the Tom Bradby interviews, Harrys statements regarding press treatment of Meghan in 2016 and 2019 with the lawsuits, even the Queens statement regarding this exit. These articles are deliberately shallow and lack basic research. Regardless of what they do, they’ll have to walk a fine line because while they are no longer working Royals, they are still part of the Royal family. They can’t use the HRH, even though they still are HRH. Why this anxiety. This just happened last month, why the impatience?

    • Hope says:

      If it’s not in a current tabloid, they don’t know about it. Lol.

      Even the Newsweek cover article presented the yoga studio as real when there’s a lawsuit clearly showing that was made up. I used to put Newsweek on par with Time magazine but not anymore if they’re not using factcheckers even for their cover articles!

      • pineapple says:

        Yah, the truly scary thing is that we live in a world where the owner of Facebook sees no problem with political ads that LIE on his platform. He doesn’t see the need to get rid of political ads that LIE. … if they lie in favour of what he believes in. This is the same tactic used by the leave side in Brexit. LIES to SCARE the populace into voting to leave. IT is horrifyingly unethical. Horrifying. And anyone who has properly studied history should be scared.

        In this day and age their are less reporters, less papers, less educated reporters. Reporters are supposed to be a key to democracy. To holding our politicians accountable. How is that working for us now? We can’t trust what we read.

      • Yeah. I read that Newsweek article and couldn’t believe the inaccuracies in it when the published Sussex court filings clearly stated otherwise. Very shoddy journalism. It seems everyone is so anxious to jump on the money bandwagon of mentioning Meghan’s name in any context whatsoever that serious fact checking and unbiased journalism has gone by the wayside.

  34. GuestOne says:

    Can’t blame Sara Latham& advisors for British press that already tends to lean into xenophobia& racism heavily for going nuclear with it in Brexit climate& with the apparent complicity of the royal family.

    If they don’t have any engagements left to honour they have Invictus coming up in May. I don’t blame them if they needed time to be low key& process it all. This is their 3rd move since getting married& new place for Harry, they’ve had family drama on both sides with Snr’s continued press tour& some of his family/their staff seeming to brief against them, given up duties which is a huge adjustment for Harry especially, setting up foundation& next steps, have ongoing issues with the press& the court cases in the background& all whilst having a young baby. It’s a lot.

    • Sunshine says:

      Guestone the sad or hopeful aspect of your statement is that if you think about it, both Harry and Meghan have never settled anywhere. Harry was sent to boarding school immediately after his mother’s death and he has been floating ever since. Same for MM post high school. Seems like after college, the longest she ever settled anywhere is Toronto. So maybe this is what they both need. The world is their oyster. My husband an I lived in 4 countries and 6 houses before settling here in Dublin where we have been for the past 12 years. They are experiencing what normal couples experience when looking to establish roots.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Harry was sent to boarding school at 8; his mother passed just before his 12th birthday.

  35. Jaded says:

    There are stores here that have big “NO MEDIA ALLOWED” posted in the windows and they shoo them out if they show up. M&H’s neighbours get very salty with photogs if they see them hovering around the area. We here on Vancouver Island are protective of M&H and are very aware of the rough ride they were given not only by the BM but by the BRF. Articles like this piece of crap make me furious because they STILL are trying to make Meghan into some kind of gold-digging diva and Harry some hen-pecked wimp when, in fact, they were shining examples of how to “royal” the best way possible. They’re going to stay behind the scenes for a while longer but that doesn’t mean they aren’t working and planning big things.

  36. David says:

    Does anyone think this has to do with an appearance at the Academy Awards on Sunday? Is that too soon? Maybe they are testing the waters? Harry and Meghan could covertly go to a few parties and network? Either way the press will always treat them like poppies it seems.

    • Olenna says:

      @David, can you please explain why people are associating the Sussexes with the Oscars.

      • David says:

        Honestly it was a random thought but it is a big event with many power players so my mind naturally went with the Oscars. Nothing other than that.

  37. Travelin says:

    She is just gorgeous! These pictures show that she has beautiful skin and such a fresh face. It really is in contrast to Kate. It is a little shocking. Especially when you know that Meghan is older or the same age? Not sure .
    But I can see why she felt so threatened. Doesn’t excuse the behavior but the glowing skin, natural charisma and the attentive and charming husband? Hope those jewels are worth it!

  38. AMM says:

    The british media is desperate at this point. Glowing reviews of Kates actual engagements get 1/3 of the comments that speculative peices about Meghan get. But that’s dying down because even the rabid DM crowd are getting annoyed with these non-stories about H&M. They desperately need H&M to actually do something because they are their cash cows.

    The Sussexs cant stop the tabloids from writing about them negatively but they can starve them out for a bit. Maybe the strategy is to get them so desperate they play nice. Reward them with pics and work info when the press starts reporting fairly.

  39. AMM says:

    And another comment- Readers dont love Kate more than they hate Meghan. Some of it is personal against Meghan (the racists) , but some of it is just people loving to complain and hate on someone. Its human nature.

    If the press ever decided they love Harry and Meghan now, the tides will turn on the Cambridges. Kate’s current support is mostly shallow, allowed because they need her on a pedestal to tear Meghan down. There will for sure be people who hate Meghan for being black and american and divorced, no matter what the press says about her. But we shouldn’t underestimate the influence the tabloids have on public opinion.

    As for the dudes involved, Harry’s always been more popular than Will. Hes more grounded, more attractive and more charismatic. It wouldn’t be hard for the press to remind people of that.

    • kerwood says:

      @AMM, very good point. I totally agree that for a lot of people, Keen Katie is just a vehicle to express their racism or resentment. Look at how her popularity blew up as soon as Meghan arrived on the scene. Before Meghan, Kate was pretty much ignored or the butt of jokes about her family and her laziness. NOW she’s the ‘English Rose’? It’s laughable.

      Someone who cares about Keen Katie needs to tell her not to take this shit too seriously because she can fall just as easily and quickly. There’s no depth to her popularity because there’s no depth to HER. She’s popular because she’s the WHITE one. That’s not a lot to build on.

      If, for whatever reason, the tabloids decided that they love Harry and Meghan, they’re going to need a scapegoat to blame their racist abuse. Keen Katie and Ma Middleton would be perfect. That ‘power behind the throne’ article is a huge red flag, especially since THERE’S NO THRONE.

  40. Watson says:

    Meg’s a planner and I cannot wait to see what they roll out! Definitely not worried for these two. 👌

  41. Awkward symphony says:

    This is another example of how petrified the courtiers/palace’s are of Meghan’s Diana moment😏
    The fools never thought prince harry would leave and it just now dawned to them that they lost their biggest assets+practically made the Sussexs FREE to rule their own destiny away from their control

  42. Adriana says:

    Boring !!!!!!!!

  43. Mollie says:

    If she and Harry really want to stick it to the royal family while actually doing some good, they should start or become ambassadors for a teen sex trafficking charity.

  44. blunt talker says:

    They are definitely being low-key in Canada. There pics about tarps and extra cameras installed since they have been there. They are doing exactly right in being low-key and going about their business to make plans for the future. I am not worried for these two-they are in the best place to revive and refresh themselves. I don’t understand the tabloid press-they should be jumping up and down that they drove Meghan out of their precious country. They should be doting everyday on the other members of the royal family. Since the Sussexes have left royal life for the time-being they have enough royal members to write about. People should point this out everytime an article discuss the Sussexes when they are no longer on the scene. The other royals in Britian are out and about everyday this should fill their tabs with stories and gossip. Educated people know and see what this young family has gone through.-Damn you still talking about them and they are out of the public eye. Evil has no shame and no game.

  45. Caty Page says:

    Commentors are a bit salty that Meghan and Harry display a loving, healthy relationship. Harry QUIT BEING A ROYAL for the woman he loved. William can’t even keep his trousers on around a rose bush.

    They embody a very feminist ideal that many men (and women) find threatening because it forces them to alter their expectations of men.

    No more philandering, boring, work-shy men who don’t care for their appearance the same way as their female counterparts. Meghan didn’t settle and that unsettles people who have or will.