Prince Andrew ‘groped girls right out in the open’ on Jeffrey Epstein’s island estate

Prince Andrew interview

As we know, Prince Andrew raped Virginia Roberts Giuffre when she was a teenager. She was trafficked to Andrew by Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking partner and procurer of underage girls. We also know that Andrew is a terrible liar and that his flat denials mean absolutely nothing, especially when there’s mounting evidence and additional anecdotal stories that Andrew was a lot closer to Epstein than he will admit to, and that Andrew was a frequent guest to Epstein’s Rape Island. Epstein had a large estate in the US Virgin Islands and he reportedly flew in trafficked girls and he hosted parties for high-profile perverts at the estate. In a new Vanity Fair article, an eyewitness has a disgusting description of Andrew’s behavior:

In an exclusive interview with Vanity Fair, US Virgin Islands’ Attorney General Denise George accuses the estate of using nondisclosure agreements with Epstein’s victims and former employees to “conceal the criminal activity of Epstein and his associates who are still there.” Last month, George, who was Miss Virgin Islands in 1977, attended the Howard University School of Law, and returned to spend decades as a successful prosecutor, also placed liens on the estate in order to make sure his victims receive their due.

“If he owns anything else that’s not connected to here, then we will have no jurisdiction,” says George in her office in St. Thomas’s Government Employees’ Retirement System building. “As the investigation continues, we will find that out. But as of now, as far as what is in the estate, it appears that a well-substantial amount is connected to his entities right here in the Virgin Islands.”

The people who worked on Epstein’s island, tended to his various companies such as Southern Trust, drove his boats, piloted his planes, etc., probably know more about Epstein’s activities than anyone else—and all are likely bound by nondisclosure agreements. “An employee told me that he saw Prince Andrew on a balcony out at Little St. James groping girls right out in the open,” George says. “He said he remembered walking up to him and saying, ‘Good morning, your Highness.’”

[From Vanity Fair]

My understanding was that in legal/criminal cases, NDAs are unenforceable? And I mean, who is left to sue these people now IF they break their NDA? Epstein is dead. His estate/brother could possibly sue, but honestly… how likely is that? It bugs me that the prosecutors aren’t making that case publicly: the NDAs are not enforceable at this point. This was a massive criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, rape and abuse, not to mention all of the financial stuff (RICO, tax evasion, etc). Meanwhile, guess who was also BFFs with another rapist pedophile?

A millionaire fashion executive accused of raping 10 women and girls at his Bahamas mansion reportedly hosted Prince Andrew and his family at the property in 2000. A class action lawsuit lodged in New York City claims that Peter Nygard lured “young, impressionable, and often impoverished children and women” to his Bahamas property with cash payments and promises of modeling opportunities, only to then “assault, rape, and sodomize them”.

Nygard, 78, has hosted celebrities and politicians at the property, near the Bahamian capital of Nassau. Photos credited to Nygard’s website appear to show such visitors included Prince Andrew, accompanied by his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson and their two daughters, 20 years ago. One photo shows Nygard talking with a shorts-wearing Andrew as the two stroll together. In another picture Nygard is posing with Sarah and her daughters, Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice.

[From The Guardian]

I’m sure it’s just a coincidence, right? I’m sure it’s not an secret organization of high-profile, wealthy men getting together on various Rape Islands to hurt and abuse women and girls for years. Ugh, so disgusting.

Prince Andrew leaves home after receiving the sack from the Queen

Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts **FILE PHOTOS**

Photos courtesy of WENN, Avalon Red and Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

45 Responses to “Prince Andrew ‘groped girls right out in the open’ on Jeffrey Epstein’s island estate”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Miumiiiu says:

    When she was a teenager, *and he was in his forties.

  2. Carol says:

    Never forget.

  3. Aang says:

    I want to know who else was there raping these girls. Clinton? Trump? Other powerful politicians I’m sure. Andrew is the least interesting because I think we already knew he was creep, and we know for sure now. I’m waiting for new names.

    • Guest with Cat says:

      I know some names who have popped up but I don’t know if it’s ok to list them without citing sources. It’s unfortunately people you normally associate with good things like physics and another famous name synonymous with home computing and now philanthropy. However, it’s not known if these associations went beyond Epstein just trying to use their reputations to enhance and legitimize his own.

      • Darla says:

        It’s true it’s not known. I go by who the victims themselves have accused. Dershowitz, stands accused. It’s possible trump stands accused by a woman who says he raped her at Epstein’s when she was 13, but there is a lot of fog around that. Of course, she’d be dead if she came forward, I believe that. So, I don’t know. But I have trump, this fool here, and dershowitz marked as perps. They stand accused. Until the computer guy you hint at (I think we all know who you mean), and clinton stand accused, I don’t group them into this. Though the certainly showed very bad judgement being anywhere near this guy, so I don’t know.

    • boredblond says:

      Yes these stories make it sound like he’s the only one, I guess because the former employees are being paid just to talk about him, or paid not to talk about others. I always thought a lot of powerful men were involved, why is andrew the only one outed? Only name in the black book? No one seems to care to dig into this story. Epsteins death doesn’t erase other people’s crimes.

    • The Recluse says:

      Drumpf had his modeling operation. That’s where he did most of preying. That and his beauty contests.

      • pottymouth pup says:

        I wouldn’t be too surprised if Trump was paid fees for the girls that were recruited out of Mar-a-Lago . . . I haven’ heard this was the case, but won’t be surprised if that allegation surfaces

    • Fabuleuse15 says:

      I feel differently. I want the US media and the Commonwealth to focus on Andrew so that the world and the gullible British masses can witness the true character of their Royal Family, and the PR voodoo propaganda of the Royal Family. Now that Meghan is gone, the British tabloids will need a new cash cow and William will need someone to feed to the tabloids. Only after the Andrew case is closed do I want new famous names to come out.

  4. EB says:

    “Show me who your friends are and I’ll know who you are.” One doesn’t make friends with multiple sexual abusers involved in worldwide trafficking and keep clean hands. All that’s left for Andrew is to be permanently sidelined from royal duties and (wishful thinking, I know) charged.

    • (TheOG)jan90067 says:

      Scrolled down to insert the very same quote, EB!

      Birds of a feather, the lot of ‘em. At this point, it wouldn’t shock me to know Freeloader (she of the toe sucking, while on vacation *with* her daughters that time, too) partook with trafficked boys. YES, I know….no pics/prooof (yet!), but considering HER ties to Epstein, and money loans….where there’s smoke….. jus’ sayin’…. there’s more to come, I’m sure!

    • Nic919 says:

      I said this elsewhere but how many pedos can you be friends with before people realize you are a pedo as well. This is beyond disturbing.

    • This! Agree The OG. I also have always thought Fergie was an enabler. The stories that have come out about her life before and since marriage shows she was into some serious sex things (especially about how she hopped around pre-marriage with that certain set of rich, older men). She and Andrew are two peas in a pod morally and in extreme lack of judgment. I really feel that this was so normalized to their two girls, that neither girl sees any fault in Andrew’s behavior.

  5. KellyRyan says:

    My understanding as well, crimes nullify NDA’s. I’ll continue to hope the information continues to flow and PA is issued a subpoena by the SDNY. End goal, self exile to Switzerland.

  6. Beth. says:

    NDAs will always have some provision which is effectively that they can be done away with if contrary to the laws of whichever contracting country/state- that will always be illegality in terms of rape/trafficking etc. So yes the NDA can’t stand and I do not understand why this is being used as an argument.

  7. OriginalLala says:

    Our society is so messed up….Pedo Andy should be locked up, not be living the grand life at Royal Lodge.

  8. Sarah says:

    This cannot be a coincidence. You don’t have established relationships with not one but two sex offenders, if you’re not a depraved individual yourself.
    But it’s not as if Andrew did something truly awful, like eating advocados, you know?

  9. carmen says:

    I mentioned this on the latest M&H post by mistake – but what about Andy’s daughters? Are they drinking the royal kool aid and seriously believing he is innocent of all this? How else could they possible stand beside & support such a monster? This is serious stuff.

    • BearcatLawyer says:

      Andrew and Sarah are still their parents, and they are heavily dependent on their toxic family’s stature and money to maintain the lifestyle they have. They will never fully disavow their family, no matter how bad it gets.

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        Then that’s a conscious choice they make.

        Harry had more perks than either of the York girls, and made the conscious choice to walk away from the toxicity. It can be done if one has the will.

  10. Lala11_7 says:

    You gotta think how CRAVEN…Andrew and Sarah are…THEY KNEW that Epstein trafficked under-aged girls to the most powerful people in the world on THAT ISLAND…but they had NO PROBLEM bringing their under-aged daughters to THAT ISLAND….

    Now…why would parents put their under-aged daughters in THAT type of atmosphere…if it were NOT for a SPECIFIC reason…..

    Think about that?

    • Esme says:

      I’m trying not to think about that – too disturbing.
      I really hope the victims can get closure, and some form of reparations, if not justice.
      Gaaaahhhh – their own daughters. Vile vile vile.

    • Amy Too says:

      What were B and E doing when their parents were either raping teenagers or begging for money? Were they sent down to the pool or beach to hang out with the “other girls”? Were they kept safe and babysat by Maxwell or some other shady person? Were they meant to hang out alone together, safely in their room? I just can’t think of anything that would be acceptable, safe, or okay.

    • (TheOG)jan90067 says:

      Thing is, these men and women think THEIR children are off limits. It’s “other people’s (read “lessers”) kids that were expendable. I’m sure B & E were kept far away from the “party house”.

  11. Esme says:

    The York’s are absolutely vile: they brought their own daughters to meet with pedos. Poor E&B, how messed up can they be growing up surrounded by such sleaze?

  12. aria says:

    Lately, Andrew is in the news which he and queen must hate it. Now they cant throw Sussex under the bus for distraction. I think Andrew shenanigans reported in tabloids seems that KP is behind some of the leaks and undermining queen efforts of Andrew into the spotlight. I think William is behind some of the leaks about Andrew and york girls. I think around Beatrice’s wedding and summer Andrew might leak about Cambridge to divert media attention. Andrew will not throw queen or Charles because he needs both of them if law enforcement happens, next to him is Cambridge’s, it is well recorded that Andrew has a problem with Cambridge leaking to press. Wait and watch Andrew will leak about Cambridge to divert his returning to duties, weddings, etc. some people really believe that Sussex’s exit is to creat the diversion about Andrew and his crime. Now Andrew being the friend with second pedophile and groping woman, suddenly we saw the photos of Sussex in the airport. This will work up to march or whatever their last month of being royal. This is my theory that all royal household plays a major role in leaking about sussex without knowing eachother.

    • C-Shell says:

      I think your prediction is highly likely to happen. And, if our assumptions about internal leak jobs is true, can you imagine a more amateur operation? The tit for tat would be disastrous because there is so much ammunition to go around. ….. I think I’ll go pop some popcorn.

    • (TheOG)jan90067 says:

      Aria, the BM and SM have no problem still trying to draw H&M into the fray. See the stories trying to drag Meg’s stepbrother back into the light (“Meg should’ve helped her own family before charity!”), and speculative stories meant to get the rabid, racist base frothing (“This is a place (very posh!) where they MIGHT think of living!” and they put in a vid of some nice house that’s up for sale in some neighborhood). It’s all utter bullshit, but they will put H&M’s pic upside along the headlines, hoping for those clicks, which translates into money for them.

      I’m afraid it will never end for them. Scarily, I almost think it will provide them further into “Diana Territory”: being hounded for ANY story, pic, etc, to boost sales, as they don’t have any other access. They will hound them for any sniff of a tidbit to put out.

      • Well — here in the United States, the average newspaper is written to be read at the seventh grade level. (You can get that fact from any college-level journalism 101 class.) I imagine the tabloids are written for an even younger level of understanding. So, I’m not surprised a tabloid could run an article about a house on the market — in say, Toronto —- being a potential home of Sussexes. Then — in the same story also quote realtor in charge of said property that there has been no interaction with the Sussexes on this home, and yet still have Joe or Mary Public taking away as fact that the Sussexes are buying that home on the people’s dime. (I saw this story just the other day.).

    • Nic919 says:

      If Andy gets solid Rose information he’s going to hit the press with it. With Brexit now in place, Billy’s human rights letter based on EU law is not going to hold a lot of weight.

  13. Nelly says:

    I know Epstein kept some blackmail evidence somewhere that can send mummy’s little pedo and others to prison and get justice for those ladies. Damn it’s not going to happen.

    • (TheOG)jan90067 says:

      I would bet everything that quite a lot/almost all of that “hard” evidence was destroyed in the fire on the island, what was it? a week or so before authorities “raided” it. I also doubt he kept the *really* incriminating stuff in his home in NY.

      • Jaded says:

        I wonder if Ghislaine scarpered with some of it? Especially stuff on easily transportable DVDs or laptops? BTW, Peter Nygard has been a well known abuser of women, including his 5 wives, for decades. He’s just as evil as Epstein so the fact that Andrew and Sarah befriended him is clear proof that they’re BOTH involved in the abuse of young girls.

  14. KellyRyan says:

    Evidence is strong. Virgin Island residence and Manhattan apartment, both were searched, evidence retrieved, notebooks, computers, cameras, video, Epstein was known for blackmailing. Those involved run wide and deep.

  15. Darla says:

    He’s so disgusting. I wish everything would come out about this entire thing, all the men.

    • I don’t think we will ever know the truth. I think this was a ring — whether formal or informal — and I think the men involved are all too rich, too powerful, and too white. I will never believe that all the stars aligned for Epstein to kill himself at that particular time on that particular night (when systems just happened to fail, guards just happened to fall asleep or skip checking on him, when 24/7 suicide watch just happened to end, etc etc). He was silenced and thus a very strong, clear message was sent with that death that everybody better keep their mouths shut. Andrew is never going to testify and no powerful man is ever going to be held accountable. I think Giselle is still alive because she has let these men know that she has evidence and has made sure it will be released if she dies. Her clock is ticking if these men are able to find and destroy that evidence — and they have the power and the resources to do it.

  16. Who ARE These People? says:

    “Sodomizing” would also be rape, yes?

    • Tia says:

      Legally, it depends on the jurisdiction. Some define any penetration as rape, others distinguish between types and require vaginal penetration with separate charges for other types (e.g. the U.K. until 2003).

      It is a poor choice of words in the article as sodomy does not have to be non-consensual. I have issues with using a word that was used to vilify consenting adult homosexual men before the law was changed to describe clear criminal conduct.

  17. ChillyWilly says:

    There is no way Fergie didn’t know what her husband was up to. And then to bring your daughters around these types of men? Despicable.

  18. mahru says:

    This case should be playing on a constant loop on news channels everywhere – NO ONE should get away with human trafficking. IDGAF if you’re a prince or an emperor or god. Meanwhile, common folk get thrown in jail for the most petty of crimes (and sometimes without a fair trial).
    So tired of this.

  19. Allergy says:

    These men are sewer slime.

  20. Jessica says:

    God Damn… how is this not taking down the monarchy? He is a pedophile who raped girls. And he’s still being supported?!!!?!?!?!?

    • Tessa says:

      The Sussex get trashed still on the DM comments and blogs. Yet Andrew is given a pass by some. The Queen never told him he could not use his HRH like she did the Sussexes.

  21. starryfish29 says:

    How many pervs do you get to be friends with before we can officially call you a perv?