The Queen ‘has not accepted’ that Sussexit is permanent, she hopes Harry will be back

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend the Endeavour Fund Awards

For the past 20 hours or so, British tabloid editors, tabloid journalists and photo editors have been acting like jilted lovers. Correct that, it’s actually been happening for two solid months. These people are so pressed that Prince Harry would leave THEM for HER. So they do what jilted lovers do: they create lie-filled narratives for why HE is leaving, they blame the “other woman,” they pore over every photo they can find, analyzing microscopic details to tell themselves that he’s not really happy, and even if he is, it won’t last. That’s where we are now: Harry will eventually come back, according to them, just as soon as this dalliance with Meghan is over. Kensington Palace’s favorite mouthpiece, Dan Wooten, has another exclusive, and the gist of it is that the Queen is not really mad at Harry at all, she’ll just miss him and she hopes he’ll be back. Just him. Because clearly, the Queen has become a stand-in for the jilted lovers of the press and all of these people need a mountain of therapy.

There is an inherent sadness behind Sunday’s heart-to-heart between the Queen and Prince Harry, which I detailed in The Sun earlier this week. Partly because the four-hour, love-filled lunch over poached salmon and salad went so well. Contrary to the belief of some royal commentators, the monarch is not overly concerned about not getting to see baby Archie, who will remain in Canada during Meghan’s return next week and for the foreseeable future.

But Her Majesty is deeply saddened about the loss of the Duke as a regular fixture in her life. The length and tone of their first one-on-one since the Megxit summit shows just how deep the relationship between the Queen and Harry really runs. She enjoys his company and the way they openly chat about life away from duty. Perhaps the unbreakable bond was created that terrible week in the summer of 1997, when she put her reign at threat by insisting she would stay at Balmoral with “the boys” as they grieved for their mum.

Or maybe it’s because she sees something of her beloved sister Princess Margaret in Harry, an irrepressible spare who never quite managed to cope with having to live in the constant shadow of their older sibling. However it developed, the Queen does not spend that amount of time chatting happily and lovingly to just anyone — especially, as The Sun’s great royal photographer Arthur Edwards pointed out to me, when racing is on.

…But the Queen is nothing if not practical. She has learned the lessons of the unedifying exits of Princess Diana and the Duchess of York from The Firm and won’t make the same mistake this time. That’s why she quite beautifully told Harry: “You are much loved and will always be welcomed back” — a line that brings tears to the eyes of a soppy old monarchist like me.

The Queen has not accepted that Megxit is permanent and probably never will. Harry needs some time away to explore and live a life where he isn’t playing second fiddle to his father and brother. Duty and the love of his country might just pull him back soon, she hopes. But perhaps the Queen hasn’t factored in the persuasiveness and passion of Meghan — a truly modern woman with very different plans for her husband and their “brand”.

[From The Sun]

I wonder what happened to the alleged list of complaints and bitcheries which the Queen allegedly unloaded on Harry, according to Wooten’s own report just days ago? Anyway, it’s clear that a lot of tabloid narratives are being and will be rewritten over the course of the Sussexes’ stay in the UK. Their glamorous happiness last night was not the narrative these jilted lovers were hoping for.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend the Endeavour Fund Awards

Beaming Meghan Markle makes her first public appearance in the UK since Megxit

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

87 Responses to “The Queen ‘has not accepted’ that Sussexit is permanent, she hopes Harry will be back”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nina says:

    The same woman who refused to meet him when he needed her?
    The woman who allowed her family to bully his pregnant wife?
    I don’t care about her feelings.

    • SomeChick says:

      I don’t think she really has any. Or she’d have not made Diana’s boys walk in a parade with her coffin.

      Anyway, Wootten is a fabulist. He outright makes stuff up. He has a “source” in the kitchen who tells him the menu?! If true, that’s even worse. But he can’t seem to keep his lies straight.

      Fortunately for him, he has a psychic bond with the queen and always knows exactly what she thinks!

      • Carolind says:

        She didn’t. It was Philip who encouraged them by all accounts and possibly Charles as well although he is not mentioned. Not HM though.

      • Some chick says:

        But she’s the Boss. She can literally overrule the lot of them. But she didn’t. At least they should have had them go in a carriage if putting them on display right then was so important.

        OTOH if Charles thought that would distract people from his role in all that happened, well, it did not. I saw it on the news, I suppose, at the time. I’m still talking about it. I was truly stunned by how awful it must have been for them.

        I believed it was just tabloid rumors and lies at first.
        Now I believe it was a hit. Anyway.

        In any case, I think TQ is boss first, grandma second.

      • Ainsley7 says:

        Philip and the Queen weren’t putting the boys on display. They were taking part in a funeral tradition. They would have been expected to do it even if the funeral had been completely private. They should have taken the fact that the entire world was watching into consideration and understood that the circumstances were different. Philip thought they would regret it if they didn’t and he had done it at a similar age with his sister.

    • bamaborn says:

      Thank you, Nina. She needs to take several seats.

  2. ziaaa says:

    Shouldn’t Wooten be vomiting non-stop glowing nuggets about his lord and master’s Ireland tour? We know he won’t coz no one currs!

    • Andrew’s Nemesis says:

      I think his lord and master is responsible for this latest sick-note. Ugh, rotten little Penis With Teeth and rotten all of them: if their behaviour (especially the Press, with Wooten and Piss Morgan at the helm) were evaluated by psychiatrists, they’d be sectioned. It’s absolutely manic.

  3. Becks1 says:

    LOL, I’m reading the excerpt and thinking “this is an oddly nice and gentle article from Dan Wooten, I wonder if William told him to be nice” and then I got to the last line about Meghan and it was like, a-ha! there it is.

    • L84Tea says:

      Yeah, I noticed that. The evil temptress Meghan has her “plans” (insert Meghan rubbing her hands together). It will be ALL her fault when Harry never comes back.

    • Bettyrose says:

      Smaller point but isn’t “modern woman” more commonly known just as women these days?

      • notasugarhere says:

        Do you consider Kate ‘modern’?

        ‘Modern’ here is being used as another attacking, gaslighting term against Meghan. How she must be controlling Harry with her evil, modern ways of thinking herself equal to her partner.

      • bettyrose says:

        No, I don’t consider Kate “modern” but she’s the outlier not the norm. I understand that calling Meghan “modern” is meant to be a dog whistle, but it makes me think of the Billy Joel song from the early 80s. We don’t call women with careers and self esteem “modern” in 2020. “Othering” the characteristics of being self confident and financially independent is an insult to all women.

  4. Nina says:

    Dan wootton is working hard to give the queen the image of a clueless head of state.
    How can she compare Harry to her sister who was alcoholic and had no legacy except her scandal with rockstar and married men?

    • salvation says:

      And @Nina, not only that but when exactly did Harry live in William’s shadow? William is the one that’s been riding Harry’s coat tails all their adult life, not the other way round. I mean, the courtiers have been trying for years to make ” magnificent Prince William the shinning like the sun heir” and “Poor dull Harry the sorry sad good-for -nothing spare” happen but nothing ever took off. Harry’s popularity through the years has been outta the roof while William is always left to wallow jealously over his little brother and his accomplishments. I mean, Margaret maybe compares to Andrew because their older siblings had such a shadow with which they struggled to cope to live in, but Harry? That’s just wishful thinking on Wootten part.

      • MsIam says:

        Exactly @salvation. I was thinking the same thing, that this whole mess was caused by Will being in Harry and Meg’s shadow, not the other way around. Case in point, look how the media ran back to London to photograph H&M. And wasn’t William said to be fretting about H&M overshadowing his Irish tour?

  5. NYCGirl says:

    That picture destroyed the narrative they had prepared for H&M’s return. I will say it again…one picture that spoke volumes while at the same time leaving millions speechless. Queenie knows what she gave up to appease William.

    • k says:

      Could they have planned a better picture? “Glamorous happiness.” There has been so much in People trying to convince people that Kate and Will love each other, too, like there was a whole story about how she put her hand on his arm. And then there’s this picture, which looks like an explosion of love and beauty.

      • NYCGirl says:

        One is natural the other isn’t. The RF is where it is today because of William/Kate’s insecurity, the inability of TQ to protect Meghan from racism yet proudly supporting Andrew and Charles’s lack of leadership. When you see “that photo” you know Meghan/Harry made the right decision for them. “That photo” will hunt the RF for months to come because eventually the press will turn on Keen Kate/Will.

    • Tour malinn says:

      Ahhhh that picture in the rain is just wonderful

    • Harry and Meghan are always holding hands, so lovingly… I don’t think I recall ever seeing a pic where William and Kate even engage in casual touches, publicly.

    • Anony83 says:

      That is EXACTLY what I thought when I saw this picture. Not only does it just eviscerate the story that the British media is trying to peddle about how brokenhearted Harry is, but it is also just so beautifully dramatic and well composed.

      It should absolutely be considered for a Pulitzer because its really not every day that a single image (or even the entire series of images from that night) is both an amazing photo while ALSO telling an entire news story (and basically destroying an entire narrative in the press).

      They say a picture is worth a thousand words but this one might as well be novella.

  6. jferber says:

    You kept the dud, QE2. You let the jewel of your kingdom be driven out of his homeland. Yes, she is clueless and cruel.

  7. Eyfalia says:

    I expeted this, and it is funny that it comes from Willileaks pressperson.

    When I saw Meghan and Harry yesterday and that photo with the diamond/stardust rain I knew somebody would have numerous tantrums because these photos outshine everything which was so carefully staged and orchestrated in Ireland. All that work for nothing, they just cannot win.

    • Originaltessa says:

      Yeah, that picture is everything. Kate and William haven’t had a wow moment like that since their wedding years and years ago. I think Kate is still beautiful and capable of looking awesome, but her partner is such a dud, it’s never going to happen. William has lost all the hot and it’s a lost cause.

      • Brit says:

        Having the worst people in your corner like Katie Hopkins, Daily Mail and Piers Morgan isn’t cutting it. Kate and William are very old school British but the problem is modern day Britain is much more complex and diverse and they don’t represent that. Harry and Meghan leaving is horrible for the family.

    • bluemoonhorse says:

      I actually think H&M did win. They left a toxic family and look at them – happy and glowing. So yeah, they won. :D

      • Eyfalia says:

        @bluemoonhorse Oh, definitely, Harry and Meghan won. I meant the other two of not winning.

  8. Case says:

    When I saw how positively GLOWING Meghan was, I couldn’t help but feel smug satisfaction on her behalf. Good for her and Harry for making the choice that is right for their family and going out on top, looking happy, engaged with the public, and in love with each other.

  9. MeghanNotMarkle says:

    Poor Queenie. She had a chance to stop this but she chose not to. I have no sympathy for her.

    • Tessa says:

      The Queen should include Harry’s family not just Harry. She apparently wants Harry to ditch his wife. Not nice if this is true.

  10. GuestWho says:

    That’s why she quite beautifully told Harry: “You are much loved and will always be welcomed back” — a line that brings tears to the eyes of a soppy old monarchist like me.

    That is some shameless word vomit right there.

    And this: But perhaps the Queen hasn’t factored in the persuasiveness and passion of Meghan — a truly modern woman with very different plans for her husband and their “brand”.

    I think the plans belong to both H&M…this narrative is getting truly old.

    • Harla says:

      Harry did say that “he” made the decision for him and his family to step back but as usual nobody is listening just like when he warned them several times.

    • salvation says:

      This is Wootten’s way of telling us that the queen is not interested in that evil black witch and her black kid, her only interest is in her white grandson.
      These fools don’t know when to stop. Wasn’t Dickie Arbiter carrying on and on about how TQ will be disappointed if she don’t see Archie? Now its TQ don’t give a hoot about Archie? Like which is it?

  11. Harla says:

    Well your Majesty, you get to keep Dan and Piers and Dickie, isn’t that enough to make you happy??

  12. AnnaKist says:

    “ She [The Queen] has learned the lessons of the unedifying exits of Princess Diana…” Actually, she hasn’t, otherwise it would never have come to this. She’d love for him to come back? But come back to what? More of the same? Why would be? She’d like for HIM to come back. Never a mention of his wife. The Royle Family had more nobility than this lot.

    • bluemoonhorse says:

      She hasn’t learned anything. Otherwise she wouldn’t have a secretary that refused Harry an appointment. Same mistakes, different day.

  13. Amy Too says:

    “ Perhaps the unbreakable bond was created that terrible week in the summer of 1997, when she put her reign at threat by insisting she would stay at Balmoral with “the boys” as they grieved for their mum.” This is absolutely disgusting! To bring diana up at all and then to pretend that the queen was grieving just as much as the boys and being super emotionally supportive. And the idea that she threatened her own reign? Really? Because right after Diana died everyone was clamoring to get rid of the queen because they really wanted the alternative which was Charles? Is he serious?

    And this? “…an irrepressible spare who never quite managed to cope with having to live in the constant shadow of their older sibling.” That doesn’t describe Harry in any way. I hate this new spin they’re going for where Harry is the jealous one who’s just acting out because he desperately wants more attention. Sure. That’s why he moved to Western Canada and didn’t show himself to the media for several weeks. That’s why he’s so mad about the constant press coverage and hounding he gets from the media. Because he wants to be MORE in the spotlight. WTF?

    Who believes this nonsense!?

    This whole article was so disingenuous and I read it with a facial expression that can best be described as “choking back bile”/“watching with horror as an old man tried to manipulate his audience by trying to force out a tear or two.” The article is just so embarrassing. He’s literally crying over how sweet and caring the Queen is? The same queen who everyone is surprised didn’t blow off a meeting with her estranged grandson to watch racing instead? These little asides that they continue to put in the articles really illustrate the hypocrisy of their spin and serve to show how cold and selfish the queen really is. “And she must really care because normally she would rather watch racing than spend time with her family members in need.” Ugh!! Rage inducing!!

    • Christina says:

      Yeah, this story is just dumb. Harry trailblazed with his charities. He enjoys being at Invictus. He loves his beautiful, intelligent wife. Men and women like Harry and Meghan don’t keep score. They embrace life, and that glow upsets the score keepers who are trying to prop up the people in line to the throne who are unhappy that the public embraces the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’ realness.

      Dumb, dumb, dumb, but somebody’s buying it.

    • bluemoonhorse says:

      JMO but bringing up Diana and the Queen in the same sentence is a place they shouldn’t go. To many remember the facts of what happened: the refusal to fly flags at half mast, later forcing boys to walk behind their mother’s casket – so yeah, putting that together as some defense is a pretty stupid move. But one thing I’ve seen with them is how stupid these people really are so hats off to them I guess for being consistent.

  14. Andrew’s Nemesis says:

    Has anyone seen the latest pictures of Meghan at the National Theatre? If anything, she looks even better today (really hard to believe, I know). I WANT THAT BLOUSE!

    • Becks1 says:

      You can take the blouse, I want that skirt!!!

    • SomeChick says:

      Not yet! Who has them?

      • Andrew’s Nemesis says:

        I’m sorry to tell you that it’s the Wail. You don’t have to click on the article: the pictures appear in the header

      • Becks1 says:

        I saw the pics in the standard, and Sussex Royal just posted some on their IG.

    • Chloe says:

      The blouse is from Topshop, the skirt is Roland Mouret.

      • Some chick says:

        LOVE that combination! TopShop & Mouret. This is how it’s done.

        Also pretty sure that little green bag is a repeat.

        The National Theater is a great patronage for her. Glad she is keeping it.

    • AMM says:

      The blouse was completely sold out in white this morning. I was gonna a order it. The other colors were almost sold out too when I checked, just a size 2 left in most of them. Sadly, I can no longer do a size 2 and my dreams are shattered.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Topshop are usually pretty good at restocking – give it a week or so and it will be back in stock. They won’t want to miss out on this press.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      The blouse is TopShop (UK high street brand) and I love that store.

    • Anony83 says:

      Oh my, that outfit is absolutely lovely (though I would spill something on it the MOMENT I thought about leaving the house in it lol).

      So I am usually VERY opposed to any kind of baby bump watches with celebrities, but does it seem like Meghan has been touching her stomach or clasping her hands in front in several of the photos from both events. And honestly, if they do want a second child, it seems like this would be the perfect time (now that they’ve officially exited the Firm and things are settling down). Not to mention that at her age (which is very close to mine), you can’t really dilly-dally too much if you want to have a child.

      It is probably just wishful thinking because they make such beautiful babies, but I definitely wonder if Archie is going to get a younger sibling soon. Lol.

  15. Brit says:

    Someone on twitter made a good point about how the media uses the “Queen”and “public” to hide behind. I think the Queen cares and wants them both back because of their profiles within the family but the media hopes they change their mind and comes back because pre Meghan coverage of that family was dull. I think the family does feel a little way about it but the media on the other hand are fuming because it’s sinking in that it’s actually happening and the money train is leaving. They know Harry and Meghan will be fine and will still have interest outside of that press pack.

  16. Teebee says:

    I’m surprised the picture of H and M holding hands in the audience isn’t getting more play. That picture demonstrates to me more of what they bring to the table of this staid anachronistic institution. They clearly adore each other, love and support each other and have no qualms about showing it. I don’t follow Royal stuff too closely, but I am sure such open and consistent PDA are not the norm for the RF. Aren’t they even frowned upon? H and M smash many traditions, but this one, of openly showing affection and closeness through prolonged touch, is to me the one that resonates the most.

    It’s truly sad how conversations and meetings and time in are given more heft towards showing regard than simple human contact…

    • I saw that photo and the one in the rain described in one article as Hollywood-style love versus the demur and proper royal show of affection exhibited by William and Kate. Un-friggin-believable!

    • bluemoonhorse says:

      The one with Harry’s arm in Meghan’s lap? Yeah, I love the umbrella pic but that one was – hmmmm-hmmm nice.

    • Emmitt says:

      Charles and Camilla have shown PDA too. Not lusty lipbiting PDA but Charles & Camilla have never been cold publically like William and Kate.

      I don’t think there’s a royal protocol on PDA. That’s just made up by William & Kate fans to explain why THEY don’t show PDA.

      • Nic919 says:

        Kate would do PDA if William didn’t push her away. She tried it at Eugenie’s wedding and on other occasions. William just isn’t interested. Well except when it’s a photo shoot for PR.

    • Lady D says:

      The couple to Meghan’s left are holding hands the same way. I thought it was cute. Can anyone I.D. the lady? She looks familiar for some reason.

      • Harla says:

        I think it’s the president of the Endeavor Fund and his wife. I caught it too and thought it was lovely.

    • notasugarhere says:

      There is no rule saying they cannot show affection. Charles and Diana, Charles and Camilla, Andrew and Fergie, Edward and Sophie. They all did/do so on work time. The stark difference between Harry and Meghan vs. William and Kate? That causes a bunch of W&K fans to insist PDA isn’t allowed, but they squeal in happiness anytime William and Kate don’t flinch when touching each other.

  17. Lyn says:

    Some of the British media are just acting unhinged, like Arthur Edwards who has really said sone seriously spiteful and cruel things about Harry and Meghan. And also Angela Levin is just nasty with Meghan. Really horrible.

    So I think Harry loves his grandma a lot and would come back under certain conditions. Like definitely not taking an taxpayer money bc that gives the media an excuse to hound them again and also working privately half the time bc I think he yearns for the freedom to work as he wants.

    The media wont allow it though bc they want to control the Sussexes, make demands, abuse them and make money from them.

    • Brit says:

      Exactly. They use the Queen to hide behind because it’s easy to do. They wanted pictures of Archie because they knew that this would be the last time in any capacity, that he would be seen. The media are desperate to control these two. They’ve never had that before. They want full access to them and with them leaving they’ll definitely have no sway anymore.

      • Lowrider says:

        That’s what I have been saying. The media wants them back but the BRF has no need for the Sussex’s.

      • notasugarhere says:

        The BRF does need the Sussexes, but they only want them back in a self-diminishing way, to try to embiggen W&K.

  18. Auva says:

    These people–including the Queen–will cast about for any and every excuse other than racism, won’t they? Ooo Meghan is too ‘truly modern.’ Oooh poor Harry could never get over his position as the spare. Maybe it was his mother’s death. Maybe it was because Will is so much luckier and balder and was born first and Harry can’t handle it.

    Anything and everything but the Jupiter-sized elephant on the entire goddamn isle, RACISM. As if all those smears, the chimp comparison, the toxicity, the nitpicking just didn’t exist.

    I used to have a soft spot for the Queen. Thought she was a dignified public fixture in some capacity. I used to like Kate, especially when they first got engaged and she seemed so shy and happy. I look at them all now and all I think is, you enablers. You racist dirtbags. You who actively stood by, silent, while the first non-white woman in history entered your establishment and was crucified, dog-whistled, and hated in the press on a DAILY basis.

    • Andrew’s Nemesis says:

      @Auva Bulls-eye. Spot on. They’d NEVER admit their internalised, institutional racism, or their complicity of silence: staying schtum when they should have – were, quite literally, duty-bound – stood up and reined in the Press. ONE statement from the Queen. That’s all it would have taken. It’s heartbreaking.

      • AMM says:

        On the subject of racism, I was scrolling Meghan’s name on twitter last night and saw someone posted the preview for the VICE documentary coming up. 600+ comments calling for the queen to strip them of the titles for someone not affiliated with them making a documentary. Accusing the Sussexs of defamation (again, they didnt make this). People are terrified of being labeled racist. It legit scares them and they wont talk about it. Someone was fired from BBC for posting Archie as a chimp, and yet people still claim there wasnt a single instance of racism against them. It’s so deluded.

        I also saw a pic of Meghan (in a pleated skirt) compared to the behinds of Pippa and Kate to claim Meghans jealous of them. They also reposted the one of Michelle Obama next to two petite white women. And then still didnt understand that it was racist. The willful ignorance is mind blowing.

    • Rene says:

      Sadly, me as well, I agree with all that you have said. I looked at the photo of them outside in the rain and in the theatre and I am happy for them to be out of there.

    • Harla says:

      As I’ve said before their silence about the racist abuse Meghan endured will be the undoing of the House of Windsor. The whole world saw it, can’t unsee it and are now wondering about the need for and the morals of a family who are supposed to be an example to all.

  19. You’ve hit a bullseye with your analysis and comments above, Kaiser. The whole lot of them are acting like jilted lovers with Meghan (and Archie) as the invading outsider. Wooten contradicts his previous article with this one. (But then we, the reading public, are so stupid we won’t notice that!). It’s hard to tell from his boomeranging plot lines whether the Queen read Harry the riot act for 4 hours or sobbed all over him and begged him to come home. I’m curious whether he’s even seen his father or his brother as the press keeps banging on about how they won’t reunite until Commonwealth event. I did see one article 2 days ago that said William was going to make an effort to meet with Harry before Harry left. Reading it I thought, crikey he’s been in country for at least a week now William, but you keep thinking about seeing him! Harry is closing in on 40 and unlike mama’s boy — Andrew — is capable of living an adult, independent life with his wife and child. The “storyline” from all of them seems to still want Harry to be this broken and grieving 12 year old walking behind his mother’s coffin. If indeed this is William speaking through Wooten, it is absolutely disgusting: the Queen has no interest in Archie and Harry —as always — needs to dump that uppity black bitch and come home. If not immediately, then hopefully as soon as he grows a pair! That’s the message I get when I read the above article. Family love or true love —- with that family and that brother, I know which one I’d choose.

  20. Sass says:

    So here’s what I gathered

    1. Queen doesn’t care about Archie
    2. Queen thinks Harry is jealous of William
    3. Queen thinks Meghan is a temporary mistake


  21. Lucy2 says:

    That umbrella picture is amazing! I hope they are truly happy and together forever.

  22. Prof Trelawney says:

    wow, if being happy is the best revenge, that umbrella pic is everything, yay for H&M. Gives me hope that maybe love will indeed win out in the end against the awful bullies in power in the BRF, the US and beyond…

  23. Sophie says:

    The excerpt lifted for this piece just about made my eyes roll out of my head. Toxicity and shifting narratives aside, be better writers, RRs!

  24. rawiya says:

    “Contrary to the belief of some royal commentators, the monarch is not overly concerned about not getting to see baby Archie,” I’m glad they’re admitting this.

    This could have all been avoided. She’s the one who put out that BP press release about an immediate resolution. She’s probably the one who chose March 31st as their last day. They wanted to stay and help part-time. She could have kept them full-time for most of this year and gradually reduced their workload until they were part-time next year. I fully people she thought she was sticking it to them by cutting them off so quickly.

    And, I hope Harry is seeing all this, reading all of these “sources”, and, if for some reason he and Meghan separate 15 years from now, I hope he remembers all of this and still doesn’t go back that snake pit.

    • Some chick says:

      No way they will separate. They are so well matched.

      People can wish all they want, but this is IT for both of them. You can see it when they look at Archie (Canada bear hat pic) and at each other (umbrella pic). Ain’t gonna happen.

      BRF whiffed this one, like crazy. H&M must be so relieved. I’m sure it’s also sad for Harry. He’s empathic. But it seems like he’d finally had enough and so far it appears to be the right call. No one moves across the ocean without a reason, and they had plenty.

      Also, just saying they would welcome HARRY back says it all about why he wants to leave.

      They didn’t really welcome Meghan. They pretended to, but…

      They deserve this. (And Meghan and Harry and Archie deserve a peaceful life.)
      I hope Harry is NOT seeing this. It must be infuriating, to read nonsense about you and your wife and baby day in and day out.

      What I wish is that I could see the interiors of Frogmore and the new place. That ain’t gonna happen, either. Hahaha.

  25. Lisa says:

    Yeah not going to happen.

  26. Veronica S. says:

    Honestly, if they had hopes this would tear them apart….my suspicion is it’ll push them closer together and make things last longer. Nothing like taking the boredom out of the post-honeymoon stage like a fight where the two of you feel like you’re up against the world together – especially since now it’s a major emotional and financial investment on both their parts to stay together.

  27. fabulousfunsteru says:

    So lovely to see H&M together again. We miss you Megan – a young, fun style and beauty both on the inside and out. The UK has definitely lost out by losing these two.

  28. Jumpingthesnark says:

    Uh, Lizzie? Check out those pics, hun. They aren’t coming back…….

  29. Annie says:

    Despite everything, I firmly believe the problem is William. I think it’s his jealousy and his petty insecurities that drove Harry away. He’s the one behind the bad press because he’s the one who’s been rumored to be stepping out of his marriage and he doesn’t want anyone to overshadow the perfect image he and Kate once had. The Queen sadly didn’t know how to manage it and she lost Harry. I genuinely don’t believe she has a problem with Meghan. Those pictures where they met baby Archie were sweet. She and Phillip looked like happy great grandparents. I think there’s a very dark side to William that we’re now getting to know.

    I don’t absolve The Queen of any blame. She didn’t step in and allowed so much BS. But to me the main problem is William. Look at those ridiculous headlines trying to position Kate as a super star. Eye roll.

    • AMM says:

      I agree. This new conspiracy to make Meghan and Harry out to be petty, jealous children sick of living in Kate and William’s shadow is all from the Cambridges. At no point was Harry overlooked by the media, in fact he was always more popular (especially upon joining the military and growing up). And when Meghan came along, they were polarizing. They were in every headline. They branched into American news sites as well. Their activities and events got daily news coverage that the Cambridges only got with their wedding and births of their children.

      This whole thing Is an attempt to rewrite history by the Cambridges. They were the stars (but humble about it!) And Meghan and Harry just couldnt survive attempting to live in their massive shadows.

  30. Calibration says:

    Surely this is the penis with teeth, leaking all over the place. Pretty rude though to say TQ doesn’t care about not seeing Archie. Assuming it’s not true. If I were TQ I’d be pissed.