The Sussexes’ ‘political’ comments are not going down well with the Windsors

Duke and Duchess of Sussex

I’m still disgusted by Donald Trump’s attack on the Duchess of Sussex this week. The fact that Meghan and Harry made a simple video for Time Magazine, encouraging Americans to vote and reject hate speech, really made all of the British and American Deplorables tell on themselves. The fact that Trump’s insults to Meghan were tee’d up by a Daily Mail reporter… well, it’s clear that some of the biggest a–holes in the world are lining up against Meghan and Harry. According to Tom Sykes at the Daily Beast, Meghan remains unbothered.

Donald Trump’s attack on Meghan Markle Wednesday night, misogynistically casting her as a shrewish wife whom Harry would “need” “good luck” to live with, will not “distract” Meghan and Harry or stop them advocating for voter engagement, a friend has told The Daily Beast. The friend also pointed out that the “inaccurate question” that triggered Donald Trump’s bullying response was asked by a journalist at the Daily Mail, whose parent company, Associated Newspapers, is locked in a bitter legal battle with Meghan.

…Nikki Schwab’s question mischievously misrepresented a video issued by Harry and Meghan to introduce a new Time 100 list in which they encouraged Americans to vote. In the clip, Harry urged viewers to “reject hate speech, misinformation and negativity.” The couple were careful not to endorse either candidate, but many drew their own conclusions. An official spokesman for the couple, asked about Meghan’s presidential preference, told The Times of London, “Most people are aware of her stances previously. They can join the dots.”

Many have seen Harry and Meghan’s attempts to not directly express their assumed preference for Biden as unconvincing; for example, Lady Colin Campbell, the biographer and friend of Princess Diana who recently wrote a biography of Meghan and Harry entitled Meghan and Harry: The Real Story told The Daily Beast that by calling for “change”, Meghan had clearly nailed her colors to the Biden mast.

However Meghan’s friend insisted to The Daily Beast that such claims were to willfully misunderstand the couple’s comments: “Meghan and Harry gave a nice message that didn’t mention a candidate or a political party. Anybody who’s been following what they’ve said this year know that she’s encouraged people to get out there and vote, and he’s been saying people should be treating each other with decency and respect.” The friend added: “I don’t think this is going to distract them.”

Sources at Buckingham Palace sought to calm the waters, emphasizing Harry and Meghan were no longer “working members” of the royal family and saying of Harry that “any comments he makes are made in a personal capacity.” They would not be drawn on whether advice or messages had been conveyed to the couple. However one source with excellent connections to the inner circle of the royal family told The Daily Beast that they expected senior royals would be at the least highly irritated at Meghan and Harry for providing Donald Trump with a chance to shore up his base by publicly insulting the Sussexes.

“The Royals go to great extent to stay out of politics, so it’s not going to go down well,” said the source. “It will be awkward if Trump wins. I imagine there will be a big showdown about it all next year when they review everything, but I can’t see them stripping them of the HRH. That was perceived as a very mean-spirited thing to do to Diana and they won’t want to bring all that up again.” Meghan and Harry were allowed to keep their HRH titles when they split the royal family, but agreed not to use them.

[From The Daily Beast]

First of all, I love/hate how the “one year review” has changed from “a chance to see if Harry and Meghan might want to rejoin the family in some capacity” to “a laundry list of punishments which will be handed down.” At this point, I do wonder if Meghan and Harry are baiting the Windsors, seeing if the Queen and Charles will actually strip them of the HRHs and ducal titles. Because I think H&M know that if they do face punitive action (and not Prince Andrew), all hell will break loose.

Penny Junor (a royal commentator/biographer) threw water on the whole “punish them by stripping them of titles” thing too, which surprised me. She told the Daily Beast: “There is really nothing further they can do. Harry and Meghan will always and forever be associated with the royal family; they are so prominent that the way they behave will always have implications for the royal family. People couldn’t give a hoot about some technical issue of whether Harry may or may not succeed to the throne. Harry is a prominent member of the royal family, and whether or not he is actually working for them anymore is frankly unimportant to most people. I would imagine the family are slightly nervously wondering what he might do next.” Haha.

The Royal Family attends a Service to commemorate the Armistice on the centenary of the end of WWI

Photos courtesy of WENN, Avalon Red and Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

90 Responses to “The Sussexes’ ‘political’ comments are not going down well with the Windsors”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Carol says:

    Too bad for the Windsors. I use to be a monarchist, but not any more. The Windsors are colonialists who want white supremacy. Down with the monarchists!!!

    • Seraphina says:

      Absolutely. All you have to do is hear that the queen has a God given right to have the position and power she has and that should be enough to send chills down someone’s spine. I used to think she was a sweet old lady, a grandmother image. HA! She is anything but.

      • equality says:

        That’s why it amuses me when haters want to call Meghan a narcissist. What is more narcissistic than saying “my blood is special, bow down to me.”

      • Tessa says:

        And William and Kate seem narcissistic, she with her “offense” at the Tatler Article and censoring it. He thinking he runs the show.

    • khaveman says:

      When have Windsors EVER liked anything about these two? When have they EVER been content. Never. So I’d stop trying.

  2. Britt says:

    I don’t know who is more desperate to hang on to the Sussexes, the tabloids or the Windsors but I can tell you one thing, it’s getting boring and stalkerish.

  3. Seraphina says:

    No matter what they (BRF and their goons) do or say or print, they will not be able to cast a shadow on this couple. Harry and Meghan are young, popular, connected and speak to global issues. And trying to cast them into darkness and not be seen or heard of will not happen. And the more the BRF lets the press publish silly stories like this, the more popular and interesting the couple become. It’s quite hilarious to watch from the side lines. And this is exactly why Will and meangirl Kate wanted them out.

    • Sigmund says:

      100% this. Harry and Megan are successful and popular, despite the racist assholes who desperately want to believe differently. Good for them. Keep on keeping on, Harry and Megan.

    • Isabella says:

      I believe that if they take away the HRH, Meghan will have to curtsey to lots of royals, which I’m sure they’d love. I don’t know what the male equivalent is.

      • lanne says:

        but will she even be around others to have to curtsey to them?

      • TheOriginalMia says:

        Meghan doesn’t have to curtsey if she doesn’t want to. She’s still an American and as such, she’s not obligated. She did so because she respected her husband’s father and grandmother. Not because it was demanded of her.

      • HeyJude says:

        She’s an American and a non-working royal, she don’t have to curtsy to sh*t.

        Nor will she feel an obligation to abide by those protocols if her and her husband are further punitively punished by stripping of titles for daring to be themselves.

        No titles=all bets are off.

      • Nic919 says:

        Zara isn’t an HRH and she doesn’t curtsey to anyone but the queen so this is another talking point put forth by cambstans in order to belittle Meghan.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Zara likely curtsys to Charles, Andrew, B&E, Edward, and her mother at private gatherings. She’s an heir to the throne, which automatically makes her outrank any of the married ins.

      • anotherlily says:

        The royal family do not bow and curtsy to each other. They all acknowledge the Queen and Prince Philip in this way but anything further is in the realms of fantasy. Position in line of succession is not a rank and is subject to change in every generation.

  4. JT says:

    The review is six months away and the RR are hyping it up to be a big showdown. Someone needs to give these people some content, because they are clearly grasping. There is nothing that the RF can do, take, or say to H&M that will have any impact on anything. What are the going to do, tell them to give the Netflix money back? Lol. This is ridiculous.

    • Becks1 says:

      The one year review is going to be Harry calling up his dad and grandmother and saying “hey, California is great, you should come visit, bye!”

    • Merricat says:

      It is hilarious to me that anyone would think these adult people, who left the RF and proceeded to fulfill every obligation, real or imagined, “have” to report to anyone except themselves and each other.

    • Myra says:

      If I was Harry, I wouldn’t even turn up to the one-year review. They can send an email or speak to my assistant because I would be too busy with my Netflix productions and other stuff

      • lucy2 says:

        I wouldn’t either! He has gone off and made an awesome life and family for himself, he doesn’t need them.
        I hope whatever they tell him, he’s like “nah, I’m good” and then applies for dual citizenship in the US.

    • Harper says:

      They keep acting like the one-year review is going to be a court hearing with Harry and Meghan in the witness box and Dan Wooten and Piers Morgan doing the opening and closing statements. Wills will be sitting next to them at the counsel table, blowing steam out of his orifices.

      • Princess Peach says:

        I do wonder if they will even bother to show for the review?

        What’s there to talk about? They have their own money, own family, and own home. There’s nothing more to dangle over their heads. The only leverage the BRF has is what…letting them continue to pay for a cottage they don’t use?

        That said I’m sure Willie is desperate for something to leak in light of Tattlergate.

      • RoyalBlue says:

        What’s there to talk about?
        @princess this is what I have been wondering myself.

        There are three possible positions, they are in, they are out or there are half in and out.

        Review could be:
        1. Agree that it’s working well, they are independent of funding and they desire to stay out (most likely outcome but the royal reporters will turn it into “they don’t want you back”)
        2. Decide to move half in and out so they can tour the commonwealth and do more work (Should H&M agree to this, but on their terms? How badly does Charles want them back to agree with their conditions? I say it will bring with it a slew of rules and conditions, so no!) or
        3. Welcome back! (not a position H&M want to pursue. Charles may want them back full time but he can’t protect them frorm the Rota, so this is not even a viable option)

        Their lawyers will show up to sign off on any review documents and close this crap once and for all.

  5. Becks1 says:

    First off, wouldn’t “stripping Harry of his HRH” be more complicated than it was with Diana? Diana had hers through marriage, Harry has his through birth. I think any action to remove his HRH would obviously throw a spotlight on the whole concept of HRH in general, which is one of those things where the more you think about it, the stupider it is. And then that spotlight obviously is also going to turn to Andrew, Beatrice, Eugenie – heck, even Charlotte and Louis.

    Nah. the royal family doesn’t want to go down that road. They prob do like that the press uses it as a threat towards the Sussexes though.

    Anyway, at least Penny Junor is finally making some sense – the Sussexes will always be associated with the royals, especially when Harry is the son of the king, and there isn’t anything anyone can do about that. And I’m sure the royal family IS slightly worried about what he’s going to do next.

    • Seraphina says:

      Becks1, I whole agree with you, especially on the HRH title taken away. Diana was married in but Harry is a BLOOD prince. So can they take his birthright away???? And is they say they can, it’s opening up a door to precedence they may not like down the road. It would be like for us common folk to be disinherited but we still keep our family name.
      Reminds me of how Anne Boleyn replaced a queen and set a deadly precedence. No pun intended.

      • notasugarhere says:

        The HRH wasn’t taken away. Diana traded it away in exchange for more money from Charles, her lawyer admitted it. She regretted it immediately, because it meant she’d have to curtsy to Fergie who kept her HRH in her divorce months earlier. Diana cried to the press about the Windsors stealing her HRH (lies). As a result, HM issued new letters patent that striped both Fergie and Diana of their HRH.

      • Seraphina says:

        Interesting that the HRH was exchanged for money. Regardless, they gave her the title and can take it away. Kinda like in divorces when women go back to their maiden name if they choose, right? But Harry is still a blood prince, right? Born to the next in line for the crown no less.

      • Isabella says:

        Are we sure that Diana gave her HRH for money? Sounds like a palace revision. Supposedly William promised her that he’d get it back when he became king.

      • Tessa says:

        Diana did want to keep the HRH. If Sarah Ferguson had the title I doubt she’d have kept it for very long. The QUeen practically threw her out of Balmoral after the topless photos appeared. Diana had a good settlement from Charles in any case. I also wonder how Fergie who kept the Duchess title but not the HRH was allowed to hawk products on home shopping and doing reality shows using her royal title. ANd the Queen clamps down on Harry and Meghan.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Nope, not revision, it came from Diana’s lawyer. Diana wanted all of Charles’s personal money, but she only got that after she gave up the HRH. The Windsors didn’t steal it. Diana gave it up willingly for more cash, immediately regretted it, and started spinning lies to try to get the public on her side.

        Diana and Fergie kept the divorced version of their husband’s title but without the HRH. That’s how it works. If William divorced Kate tomorrow, she’d be ‘Kate, Duchess of Cambridge’ not ‘HRH Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge’.

      • Tessa says:

        Let’s say Harry and Meghan gave up the HRH, they would have the same arrangement as Fergie who hawked items on Home Shopping and worked for various companies such as weight watchers. I wonder. I think they would not be allowed by the royals to go into business on their own who seem to have different standards if they had the titles but went into business. On blogs there is a demand by the bots to “strip” Harry and Meghan of the titles, I don’t remember these stringent calls being applied to Fergie.

    • MissMarierose says:

      If they strip Harry of his HRH for generic statements like this, they’ll be hell to pay in comparisons with the Duke of Windsor, who kept his HRH even though he was a Nazi sympathizer.

      • Tessa says:

        At the time, the royals thought the Windsor marriage would end and Wallis would remarry. So they took the HRH from her that she was entitled to. It turned out there was no divorce.

      • HeyJude says:

        Nazi sympathizer is a very charitable term at best.

        At one point wasn’t he actively collaborating and promoting to his remaining supporters in the country for Britain to agree to a truce after Dunkirk and then the Battle of Britain in the hopes Hitler would re-install him as a friendly head of state in the surrender terms? This deep WW2 history geek stuff though.

        Of course this is nothing to say of Prince Randy nowadays in comparisons…

  6. GuestWho says:

    “Mischievously” misrepresented – I think the word he was looking for was “maliciously” misrepresented.

  7. S808 says:

    I long for the day they’ll stop running to the Windsors for their “thoughts” and reactions every time H&M breathe.

  8. C-Shell says:

    If the monarchy and monarchists could pull their heads out of their a**es for one minute …

    Harry and Meghan have done amazing things in the six months of their freedom IN LOCKDOWN, they should be making everyone proud and happy for them. Instead, deafening silence while the smears continue unchecked. The one-year review is make or break for the BRF. All eyes will be riveted, and the analyses will go on for weeks/months.

    • equality says:

      With all the news about how much the royals really cost and that fact having been suppressed for years, you would think the country would be happy to have some paying their own way.

      • Lady2Lazy says:

        @ equality, exactly! But it seems that they, the RR and Keen and Unable, still want a bit of flesh from both of them, primarily Meghan since she made Keen cry. Such a petty and deceitful twit she is. No wonder Willieaks is looking for greener pastures. I would imagine that in good time, it could be possible that they divorce, of course at Willileaks prompt. I do not see them making it for decades as the apparent unhappiness that they both display. I could be completely wrong, they just don’t seem in the least bit happy.

  9. Tessa says:

    I noticed something jarring. Lady Campbell was not a friend of DIana. Diana avoided her, Campbell really wrote nasty things about Diana. Campbell should stay out of it and stop rewriting history

    • BayTampaBay says:

      Lady Colin Campbell and Diana’s relationship was much more complicated than your description implies.

    • Tessa says:

      Diana had her number. If they were close, Campbell would not have written all the bad stuff about Diana. She’d want to cultivate her. Campbell has a title from a one year marriage ages ago and insisted she keep the title despite her ex’ opposition. Also Campbell said the Queen Mother was illegitimate (something she lifted from other writers like Kitty Kelley).

  10. Beech says:

    No worries about golden boy, Andy’s behavior? Very telling.

  11. Dee says:

    An outdated institution is upset that people have left and moved on. Hmm. Sounds like a good thing.

  12. Mumbles says:

    “ one source with excellent connections to the inner circle of the royal family told The Daily Beast that they expected senior royals would be at the least highly irritated at Meghan and Harry for providing Donald Trump with a chance to shore up his base by publicly insulting the Sussexes.”

    This doesn’t sound reliable. At best it’s the opinion of a hanger-on. The official statement from the royal family was that they were not going to comment.

  13. Mignionette says:

    Like I said in my other post – who cares. They left that royal ghetto. Onwards and upwards.

    Anyway I read that as Harry and Meghan threatening their status quo. They are figure heads. Tis all. Time for them all to get down to the job centre sharpish. The UK taxpayer have just bailed out the Crown Estates. Lilibet wants to have her cake and eat it and get her biracial grand-daughter-in-law to chip in she needs to button it and let her make some bread.

  14. Rae says:

    I loathe the Daily Fail.

  15. Mina_Esq says:

    Meghan’s only crime is being royal while black. These racist a***oles are so transparent with their fake outrage over non-political political comments.

    • lanne says:

      Her bigger crime was being a better royal while being black than the English blood and roses folks. The only “safe” way to succeed within the royal family is to practice a very studied mediocrity. being too good at your job is worse than being terrible at it. But even if Meghan had kept her eyes downcast, walked 3 steps behind Harry, never opened her mouth, she would have been criticized for being (lazy, ungrateful, unworthy, gauche, American) black. Mediocre people in power are always threatened by talent. Prince Harry was subject to it–held to standards that his brother wasn’t (Harry had to go to “rehab” for smoking pot when both brothers were smoking it together, William’s costume at the party where Harry wore the nazi uniform was just as offensive). Still, he created Invictus games and Sentebale. William has created…what, exactly? The Sussexes would have never been able to find success within the royal family because William’s mediocrity was more important to them than Harry and Meghan’s talents. Meghan got the racism, but really, any wife of Harry, even the dimmest of dim blonds, would have been Fergified. At the very least, they would have created a beauty contest between Kate and dim blond–the Middleton’s probably would have snuck lard into the poor girl’s food to make her gain weight. Pretty much the only contest Kate could possibly win with another woman is to be thinner. Anyone Harry married would be subject to a shitshow–it’s just with Meghan, he found a true partner with whom he could make his own life. Otherwise, he would have spent his entire life tethered to mediocrity that he wouldn’t be allowed to surpass. Even if he and Meghan split up, there’s nothing for him to go back to.

      • Tessa says:

        Some horrible comments about Meghan on those blogs–claiming she “whitens her skin.” The royals apparently don’t want to know about the vile comments.

      • Tessa says:

        Chelsy is praised today but she was treated badly by the media(not as bad as Meghan though). She was compared to”perfect Kate” and she was body shamed and name called. She was said to be “not suitable” for Harry. I don’t know how she stood it. But I think whoever Harry married even a beauty Queen who won a nobel prize would be derided.

      • Nic919 says:

        Chelsy went to law school and became a solicitor while Kate partied and went to bars but they tried to make Chelsy look like a drunk. Meanwhile Kate can barely string a sentence together and her basic undergrad is just that, basic, as she exhibits no intellectual ability whatsoever. But she’s thin so that makes up for a lot in media circles.

      • Nic919 says:

        @Tessa, the thing is Meghan is more intelligent and objectively more beautiful than Kate, so they only have the racism element to attack her with because she has all the things Kate wishes she had. The cambstans only have the future potential titles to harp on which shows just how little she is going to win at the game of life. Of course the Middletons help encourage the dogwhistles by the various media because outside of the white supremacists, when the two women are compared, Kate is the awkward girl who isn’t a natural beauty, aging rapidly and has nothing of substance to offer.

  16. Bella DuPont says:

    If I’m honest, I’m a little surprised Donald Trump hasn’t been attacking them more in general. I worried they would become his new Colin Kapernick – a figure to abuse almost daily, just for sport. Maybe he’s too cowered by the fact that Harry is a white, male Prince.

    • Chris says:

      Trump does not have time right now, he is fighting for his reelection. I am sure Piss Moron is texting him every day to smear on them. I believe that if Trump is reelected, he will regularly get into the Sussexes’ business.

  17. equality says:

    Of course, Colin Campbell and Trump are against what Meghan and Harry said. If people start rejecting hate speech and look critically at things, they are both out of business.

  18. JT says:

    I can’t wait until the COVID is under control and H&M get their foundation and projects running and they can start doing red carpet events. The BM and the royals are really going to blow a gasket. The farewell tour, with Meghan in that red dress, had them all melting down. It is going to be a sight to behold. The RF should be rooting for H&M to be successful, their good works will rub off on them. They’re the ones who bring any interest to the royals anyway. If they could be supportive they would gain so much goodwill. Idiots.

    • Lady2Lazy says:

      @ JT, you are absolutely right!! Imagine the good will they could have brought to not only the monarch but to the commonwealths as well!! They are stars that are only starting to bring their brightness to the forefront which could have helped The Firm, but instead they allowed pettiness, looking at you Keen, and racism to take hold.
      Now we have them here in the US were they are welcomed with open arms and love!! We love them and are excited to have our own royalty to which we can share in their endeavors and support their causes!

      In the case of Drumpf and his usual nasty comments about Meghan, he has always and will forever be threatened by a strong, self assured and bold women who speak with authority, self respect and decisiveness. Drumpf only made those comments due to the coward that he is. Furthermore, he is probably still holding a grudge that Meghan stood him up during his last visit with TQ!

  19. caitlinsmom says:

    Is any one else reminded of the lyrics to “you’ll be back” from Hamilton? Just replace “fully armed battalion” with “salty journalists writing racists hit pieces to remind you of my love” and you’ve got it.

    • Angelica Schuyler says:

      Oh this is great! I can just envision it as one of those Jib Jab pieces with Betty, Chaz, and Wilileaks as a trio in place of the king, and the salty media as the chorus in the background!

  20. Merricat says:

    I don’t think Harry will let any of the RF (et al.) tell him what to do from here on out. He might take their words into consideration, but he has his own family now and will make his own way. It’s very pleasing to see.

    • Merricat says:

      Also, very American. It must drive the Brit tabs crazy.

      • Nyro says:

        Harry was made for America, as was his mother. People here are going to appreciate his work ethic and his ability to create and build organizations. In the awful Jan Moir’s latest article, she dismisses Harry as a guy who “finished at the bottom of his class at Eton”. Do they really think any power players in America actually care that Harry got poor grades at Eton twenty years ago? First off, Americans dgaf about Eton. Secondly, the fact that he was a bad student yet was able to go on to be successful is inspirational to Americans. Royalists really don’t get it and they think they’re owning HM when they call him stupid or mock Meghan for having worked on a game show and having a wedding invitation side hustle. They really don’t get it. I’m so glad they Saud peace out and moved to America.

  21. Bluemilk says:

    “I would imagine the family are slightly nervously wondering what he might do next”. Well, I have a feeling Harry will release a memoir next year.

    • Becks1 says:

      I don’t think it will be next year. But I think at some point he and Meghan WILL spill some tea (maybe not for decades, when William is king – can you imagine – William becomes king in 25 years, he’s 63, he’s finally king, and bam! Harry releases his tell-all, one-upping William once again. LOL.)

      But I really don’t think they will do anything to embarrass the Queen or Prince Charles.

  22. Feeshalori says:

    I’ll bet the salty RF is wishing they took HM’s half in-half out offer now. Best decision for the couple to have gone their own way. HM are now exacting revenge with a capital R!

  23. notasugarhere says:

    The royals stay out of politics?

    Charles and the spider memos.

    HM and her constant political interference in the Commonwealth. HM having her staff release info sideways that she was pro-Brexit and anti-Scottish Independence.

    Kate’s entire ‘Broken Britain’ early childhood mismash, a phrase used by xenophobic Conservative Little Englanders for over a decade.

    William telling people of ‘Africa’ they’re having too many children, while he has three.

    W&K’s staff is filled with BoJo and Scummings henchmen.

  24. Case says:

    “… such claims were to willfully misunderstand the couple’s comments.” This is everything ever written about H&M by British tabloids, ever. Willfully misunderstanding their actions and comments and making them out to be people they’re not. It blows my mind how many people listen to the tabloids instead of just looking at who H&M are on their own.

  25. LNG says:

    I always think it’s funny when Trump responds to someone saying “don’t be a racist!” or “reject hate speech” or “vote!” as though the person had named him personally. Yes, thank you for acknowledging that you are obviously a racist bigot trying to cheat to win an election and everyone knows it.

  26. Mads says:

    Junor’s comments are interesting because she is a mouthpiece for Charles.

  27. ABritGuest says:

    I don’t think the Sussexes are antagonising the Firm. Their comments in the Time video are so similar to things the Queen said about importance of voting and Charles& William said about hate speech& falsehoods. I don’t think Harry talking about not voting was appropriate but that one comment aside, what they said wasn’t remotely controversial. Just usual faux outage& that’s why the Daily Fail had to lie about what was actually said to get that Trump reaction.

    The Firm didn’t say anything when the press made the state visit about Meghan’s absence despite her having had a baby a few weeks prior or when Trump made that nasty comment before so why would they care now. Briefings that seem to come from the Firm are worse than what Trump said.

    I’m sure the Firm are nervous about what’s next as this is uncharted territory for them. but as we said they did it to themselves-funniest thing is this drama was all of the Firm’s own making

  28. Harper says:

    Every election year, the nonincumbent party calls for change. Every. Year. The British tab scum should do some research on American campaign rhetoric before blowing their minds and screaming to strip H&M for saying something very nonalarming, nonthreatening to us Americans.

  29. BnLurkN4eva says:

    It is so ridiculous how these people go on about such innocent comments. My goodness what would they have done if H/M had decided to go no holds bar on both the BRF and the BM? What would have happened if they had both agreed to an interview in which they name names and retold events? H/M have been nothing but gracious, careful and thoughtful throughout the entirety of the events that have occurred since they met, became engaged and got married. Even towards Thomas Markle, who has been the worse kind of traitor, they’ve been gracious. They actually give meaning to the term, go high when they go low. These people (BM, BRF, online trolls) are irredeemable all of them for going after this couple in this manner. Willfully misinterpreting them indeed.

  30. Nyro says:

    Penny Junior? She wrote a piece a few months ago all about how “irrelevant” the Sussexes were and how they’d fade into obscurity under the long shadow of the BRF. Poor thing.😂😂

  31. Mariane says:

    I really never thought I’d see the monarchy being abolished but it’s becoming possible thanks to their recent actions. The idiots unknowingly gave Harry and Meghan so much power. If they shut down reporters when they started attacking Meghan or reigned in billy and his leakers I honestly think that the sussexs wouldn’t have been as popular as they are today. I bet they are having panic attacks about what they could do next. The new story in the mirror about Harry and Meghan wanting to come for Christmas is hilarious😂they failed to sell their storylines about harry being unhappy in LA so they are now trying to sell that they are eager to break travel restrictions and risk getting covid all to be with vipers.

    Imagine being so stupid to keep pushing this narrative during a global unrest and protests against racism+commonwealth threatening to break away with this colonial institution. I hope they are stupid enough to continue attacking them. I see that they are already re starting the Frogmore rent stories(probably planning to give it to Beatrice). It’ll be the final straw if they publicly make them pay considering how it was a gift and how the keenbridges dont pay for either properties

    • bloemheks says:

      When they decline to go to the UK for Christmas it will of course be spun that they weren’t invited.

  32. Vanessa says:

    I think it’s karma for all of the royal reporters screaming that for years that Meghan and Harry are the irrelevant couple . The royal reporters can’t seem to stop reporting about the couple they deem irrelevant kate and William both have events and the royal reporters didn’t even promoted it or talked about it . All the royal reporters can talked about are Meghan and Harry the Cambridge’s spends years helping the press drive Meghan out of the royal family so they can have the spotlight to themselves but ever since Meghan and Harry left the spotlight on them as only gotten more bright the Sussex’s are always in the news everything they do is breaking news . It’s funny the Cambridge’s and the courtiers were so afraid of the Sussex’s overshadowing them that they undermined Meghan smeared and bullied her out of jealousy and pettiness . And the press that Cambridge’s desperately wanted don’t bother reporting about them they become the irrelevant couple in their desperation to be the only young royal couple they help Meghan and Harry become a unstoppable couple with so much attention.

    • Nyro says:

      Yes. That’s why BP put out that very clear statement the other day. They finally said Harry no longer works for us and we don’t speak for him. They can’t get any press now bc the BM are more obsessed than ever with the Sussexes. Harry and Meghan are trending on UK twitter today. Eugenie announced her pregnancy and yet Meghan and Harry are still the top story over there. They can’t put the genie back in the bottle. If they think they’re getting overshadowed now, just wait until the U.S. gets Covid under control. Just wait until Archwell is launched. It’ll be over for the the local royals.

  33. Zaya says:

    Their comments were nothing radical. Vote. Don’t fall for hatred rhetoric. Be emphatic. No one even uttered his name, but of course since trump is the antithesis of all those things, he and his supporters took offense.

    And who cares if trump isn’t a fan of Meghan. Who wants trump as a fan? Having djt not like you is badge of honor. It speaks highly of your character. Here’s a little recap of people who trump likes and does not likes: Meghan – “not a fan.” Ghislaine Maxwell – “wish her well.” I would rather be in the company of the former, not the later.

  34. Charfromdarock says:

    I’m guessing the being cautious around Drumph is more to do with the Epstein-MG-PA connection and not wanting PA to end up the scapegoat.

    M&H got the happily ever after in the fairytale that the royals can never actually have.