‘It’s been devastating’ for the Cambridges ‘having to go it alone, post-Sussexit

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge talk to staff and patients during a visit to the defence medical r...

This coming week is going to be full of anniversary keenness for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. April 29th will mark their 10-year wedding anniversary and we’re not supposed to talk about the decade before that wedding, a decade where Kate stalked William and simply waited him out as he cheated on her constantly. But the Keen Narrative! Never put a foot wrong! Lynchpin! Keen Guevara! Peacemaker! That’s what we’re supposed to talk about, I guess. Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy have done a lengthy piece about the Keen Decade and mostly it’s just an excuse to rehash the old stories with a positive spin to make both William and Kate sound less lazy. I guess there are a few interesting parts though, which I’ll highlight. You can read the full piece here.

W&K are not glamorous, social & interesting: When the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge moved into Kensington Palace during the third year of their marriage, the capital was agog with excited chatter. The handsome young couple were bound to be setting up the most fashionable social salon in London. Well, it hasn’t worked out quite like that. Indeed, their ‘house manager’, who’d previously worked for busy socialites and hoped to oversee some amazing entertaining, decided to quit because it was ‘all too quiet’. As he told friends, ‘It was a shame because they are such nice people and I was really fond of them.’

Kate is not… competitive: ‘Catherine is so marvellously uncompetitive considering the amount of attention she gets from everyone,’ says one senior Palace figure. ‘She manages to raise the Queen’s spirits. The Queen sees it as quite wonderful that William married such a sensible girl whom the public seem to love for her own sake.’ And how typical of that girl whom William first fell for when he was 20 to arrive unannounced, and with a bunch of daffodils from the royal garden in her hand, to join the Clapham Common vigil for Sarah Everard, the 33-year-old murdered marketing executive. Kate’s simple, private gesture was widely appreciated by women and thoroughly approved of by William.

Why is Meghan even being mentioned? No one in those early, happy days could possibly have anticipated Meghan’s sullen disappointment at her new life, and the flight from royal duties by a petulant Prince Harry with the wife who had failed to adjust to life at court. ‘It’s been devastating for William and Catherine having to go it alone,’ says a senior Palace figure. ‘Thank goodness Catherine at least was able to adapt to her new life without any fuss. I can’t recall her complaining about anything. No one at the Palace did any more for her than for Meghan. It’s always been the same when someone new arrives in the family – you’re here, you’ll learn, now get on with it. She did. She gives William so much confidence.’

Remember how Kate flashed everyone constantly for years: A sobering lesson was about to be learned, however, that even on the most carefully choreographed royal tour the unexpected can always happen. And there was Kate on the tarmac at Calgary international airport, when a sharp gust of wind lifted the hem of her yellow Jenny Packham dress. In a Marilyn Monroe moment, there was a flash of thigh, exposing those long and shapely legs that had brought William’s eyes out on stalks a decade earlier at the St Andrews fashion show. Canada liked William, but they fell for Kate’s charms.

Profound sadness: All the same Meghan Markle’s arrival was a glittering addition to the royal story with all eyes on this glamorous ‘Fab Four’ of William, Kate, Harry and Meghan. That it all fell apart so swiftly remains a matter of profound sadness. For as long as the Sussexes remain in exile in the US, their son Archie and his yet-to-be-born sister will know next to nothing of their cousins George, Charlotte and Louis…Whether this royal rift can ever properly be healed remains a matter of considerable conjecture. Amid such heartfelt dismay, Anmer, with its swimming pool and tennis court and open acres, has been a refuge for William and Kate. It was where they chose to be in the week after the death of Prince Philip. William would happily live there full-time, but then he always knew things would have to change when George started school at fee-paying Thomas’s in Battersea.

William is still enraged: ‘With everything that William has on his plate, that interview was the last thing he needed,’ says one of William’s friends. ‘William was incredibly upset over what was said about the Royal Family and racism. And he was enraged that Meghan should drag up that cruel old chestnut ‘Waity Katie’.’

[From The Daily Mail]

“Thank goodness Catherine at least was able to adapt to her new life without any fuss…No one at the Palace did any more for her than for Meghan.” Lolz. Kate is still infantilized and praised for doing the bare minimum while Meghan was expected to work constantly from Day 1 of her engagement, all while being abused by press and palaces. And did Kay and Levy really say that Canadians liked Kate *because* she flashed her ass at them? I think so. As for Kate somehow, magically, not being competitive… yes, that’s why she’s still copying Meghan. That’s why Kate and William’s a–holes puckered when Meghan came around and they tried to bully her out of the country. Because Kate is not competitive.

Royals visit West Ham United’s London Stadium

Royals visit West Ham United’s London Stadium

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

296 Responses to “‘It’s been devastating’ for the Cambridges ‘having to go it alone, post-Sussexit”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. NicDix says:

    It’s easy to adjust when your whole life is centered around grabbing and keeping a man.

    • StartupSpouse says:

      And that man comes with chefs, drivers, nannies, a bottomless wardrobe budget, fancy houses, all the free time in the world to dedicate to charities… sign me up!

      *glances over at William*

      Yeah, um, on second thought, I’m a hard pass.

    • ABritGuest says:

      It was easy to adjust when the firm seemed to allow this option called being a part time royal when Kate married in. Kate was given lots of space to settle in to the point that they are still talking about her finding her voice a decade in& she’s praised for the bare minimum like walking on cobblestones in heels.

      Press criticism was met by people playing the ‘we don’t want another Diana situation’ card initially & even the prime minister& opposition leader took up for her when Hillary Mantel made quite an astute observation about her media portrayal.

      We’ve seen corrections and article modifications for Kate eg around hair extensions & over the Tatler article. And the royal family’s press since Oprah has proven that they are VERY proactive when it comes to certain royals including Kate so absolutely proving they could have done more to protect Meghan & obviously chose not to.

      Quite sickening to see the Fail talk about the Cambridges having to go alone when they are some of the parties responsible for Sussexit. And starting on the narrative about the family not getting to know Archie& his little sister- well there was something they could have done about that.

      • swirlmamad says:

        All true. I mean, what IS it about this mindless twit that the RRs continue to fall all over themselves to prop her up in such an exaggerated way??? I know since Meghan came on the scene it is due to needing to protect white womanhood and white supremacy at all costs, but it’s just SO insanely over the top. It’s nonsensical.

      • Tessa says:

        The we don’t want another Diana situation was so laughable. So Kate being lazy was to “protect her” from being another Diana. Diana’s issues were with her husband not work. Diana went right out there and worked and did not need protection from it.

      • Isa says:

        Meghan’s old life looked really amazing. Yoga, roasting chicken, well off enough to afford beautiful clothes and fresh cut flowers, traveling, and doing charity work. People act like she’s such a gold digger, but there’s no way I would trade all that just to wear a tiara for a couple of hours, unless I REALLY loved someone.

    • Yvette says:

      Perhaps my memory is starting to fad a bit, but hasn’t Cate done several print and video interviews in which she has admitted to having always been competitive?

      • Laugh or Cry says:

        And they both have articulated they cannot/banned from playing board games because someone will get angry and slam the board and all the tiles… 😒

    • Andrew’s Nemesis says:

      Yet more Kate-inflating. And ghastly Uncle Gary gave an interview to the Wail the other day. Something is very rotten in the House of Cambridge, and I bet that it’ll come to a head in the next few months.

      • Tessa says:

        Probably the comments about Uncle Gary’s bad behavior are removed from the Wail’s comments section.

      • Bunny says:

        Agreed. The number of “never put a foot wrong” gossip pieces have reached a fever pitch.

        My guess is that “Sussexit” put a wrench in William’s timetable, but that he won’t wait forever and risk having Kate ascend the throne with him.

  2. LeaTheFrench says:

    Ha – I had to laugh at your choice of pictures to go with this article!
    No harm intended, I also don’t photograph well at all 😉
    I’ll say one nice thing: I like the lace black dress, and the navy suit.
    The Daily Mail article is simply asinine.

  3. TeamAwesome says:

    It was in no way just a “flash of thigh” in Canada, and that was absolutely not the first and only time we have seen way more of her than we ought.

    • Eleonor says:

      She attended to the “sobering classes” after!

    • iconoclast59 says:

      And it’s infuriating how they framed the incident. “Tee-hee! Wow, look at what fantastic legs Kate has!” First, it’s gross and sexist to be commenting on her body, especially parts that she didn’t intend us to see. But more importantly, we all KNOW the kind of press Meghan would’ve gotten if a similar incident happened to her: “Disgusting! Look at the shame she’s brought on the royal family!”

      I thought we were done with this over-the-top, bald-faced, lying-in-your-face-I-dare-you-to-call-us-on-it type of press when Trump left office. But the BRF is happy and eager to keep it going. Sick, sick, sick!

      • Nic919 says:

        There are more photos of Kate’s private parts out there in the media sphere than there are of Meghan, despite being accused of doing so many “racy” sex scenes as an actress. Really says a lot that Meghan in her professional capacity as an actress covered up more than the “English rose” commoner Kate who is supposed to be the perfect princess who never put a foot wrong.

    • Jaded says:

      As a Canadian I can attest to the fact that incessant bum-flashing isn’t something we hold aloft as a modern Royal ideal in addition to the usual boring pomp and circumstance.

      • Cessily says:

        I’ve seen the runway photos and drunk Katie falling out of party dresses. She was a party girl who followed the crowd. Rewriting history only works on those who never question the current narratives. The facts are still out there for those that want to research reputable news sites, avoiding tabloid gossip. In today’s world it always will be too.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Jaded, I’m sorry but when I read that part of the article above, I immediately had this image of Canadian MEN salivating. And then I was wondering what was wrong with them. I’m not Canadian, but I’m offended on your behalf.

      • Jaded says:

        @Saucy&Sassy – LOL!!! The only thing Canadian men salivate over is hockey! She’s not their type anyway. I think the majority of Canadian men prefer women with more personality, more interests, and more meat on their bones.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        OMG, Jaded, now I have an image in my head of K holding a hockey stick while she flashes everyone!

    • Nic919 says:

      I don’t think the bum flash was covered in the Canadian media because most Canadians would have thought she was unprofessional to be wearing a thong and nothing else for a work event. And the world got to confirm that’s what she did because it was far more than a flash of thigh.

      And if that was the only time you can chalk it up to an error in judgment, but it happened multiple times.

    • Tessa says:

      It’s all over the Internet, the “wardrobe malfunctions” more than flash of thigh.

    • h-barista says:

      @iconoclast59, Agreed but not sure this isn’t done deliberately. The “long legs” part is likely a bit of Middleton spin as well given how obsessed Kate is with false waistlines.

    • PEARL GREY says:

      Kate has been flashing her unmentionables for the longest. There are plenty of photos online of her baring her cleavage, thighs, bum, knickers and her royal hoo-hah falling in and out of cabs drunk and still up to the same antics on engagements. I have no problem with any woman flashing the flesh but not when you’re meant to be on the job, and not while being painted as some demure English rose (remember that “Introvert Kate” and “sexual Meghan” article?). If they’re going to try to rewrite history, they might wanna try scrubbing the pics first.

  4. Paperclip says:

    “Amid such heartfelt dismay, Anmer, with its swimming pool and tennis court and open acres, has been a refuge for William and Kate.”

    I’m sure that comforts the British people and The Commonwealth.

    • equality says:

      We just need the number of bathrooms and the cost to make the picture complete. There was all kind of pushback about H&M supposedly putting a tennis court at Frogmore but it’s suddenly okay to have one?

      • (The OG) Jan90067 says:

        Not just “have one”, but they moved the tennis court over JUST A COUPLE OF *FEET* (at a cost of well over £100K) because it “interfered with their view”.

        And funny…I don’t remember the prolonged screaming when she had 1A COMPLETELY repainted because she didn’t like the purple she painted it first, OR the cost of redecorating *and* tearing out a new kitchen in Amner for another one. A few protests and *poof* all gone!

      • Wiglet Watcher says:

        Also with the tennis court… they seized farming land to do it. The tennis court was built outside of the AH lot and they had to compensate the lease holders that used it to farm. There was no option for the lease holder as the court was already under construction.

        Much like there was no option for the lease holders of 1A. The charity. Kate wanted it so she gets it and tax payers buy it.

    • Jais says:

      Lol this is where I think they’re starting to mess with the Cambridge’s. It’s like when they mention the number of rooms and price of Meghan and Harry’s montecito house. I’m waiting for the article that starts mentioning the cost of the renovations for Anmer Hall and its tennis court and swimming pool. Maybe after the anniversary.

      • Becks1 says:

        It definitely seems like a pointed reminder of how cushy their life is at Anmer, especially with the comment about “open acres” considering how many people in the UK have been shut down for the last year without access to acres of outdoor space.

      • Amy Too says:

        And that pointed but about William (just William) would happily live there full time.

      • Sofia says:

        Definitely seems like a pointed jab. In another article there was another one that said something like “after 10 years it’s time for the Cambridges to step up to the plate” and that felt like a pointed jab as well.

        My guess is that they throw them in every once in a while as a reminder that they will not be afraid to write and say things the Cambridges may not want out there.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Jais, I wondered if someone wanted to get it out there that H&M aren’t the only ones with a swimming pool, tennis courts and acres. Interesting.

    • Over it says:

      Such an incredibly hard life. Having to escape one palace and force to live rough in the country. Oh the absolute horror.

    • Harper says:

      “Amid such heartfelt dismay, Anmer, with its swimming pool and tennis court and open acres DOTTED WITH ROSE BUSHES, has been a refuge for William.”

      There. Fixed it.

      Actually, Richard Kay does a remarkable job proving that for the past ten years, the Cambridges had a super cushy private life that had nothing to do with HARRY.

  5. Cecilia says:

    Why are these royal reporters and palace aides so intent on lying this much? There is credible evidence that the palace did absolutely nada for meghan while going out on a limb for keen and andrew. And they are not alone. Miss sophie is there and does anyone even remember that charles and camilla are still alive? Anyway, how sad is it that the keens can never shine on their own? Meghan and harry always have to be mentioned in everything they do

    • Snuffles says:

      They do it for the clicks because that’s what the bulk of their income is based on. But even that is slowly starting to dry up judging by the Daily Mail’s frivolous lawsuit against Google because they are no longer first in Google search results in royal related stories. Probably other stories too.

      Rehashing of old stories is stale and boring readers. Harry’s “return” was just a blip and hardly enough to get fresh stories going. And after baby girl Sussex is born, Meghan and Harry are probably going to lay low even more to tend to their newborn. Now there is talk of postponing the Diana statue unveiling probably because they know the chances of him coming are slim to none because that’s when the baby is due.

      It’s going to be a DRY, drought filled summer for royal reporting unless they change their tact. At some point the stats and the drop in sales and ad revenue will reach a point where this attempt to put lipstick on a pig will be thrown out and they’ll start carving the pig for dinner.

      • Jais says:

        I’m sorry what? The DM is really suing google bc they’re not at the top of google searches for royalty? Do you have any links? Omg that’s funny.

      • Oh, SNUFFLES, that last sentence was hysterical! Thanks for the early morning laugh. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

        “ It’s going to be a DRY, drought filled summer for royal reporting unless they change their tact. At some point the stats and the drop in sales and ad revenue will reach a point where this attempt to put lipstick on a pig will be thrown out and they’ll start carving the pig for dinner. “

      • Demi says:

        Yes that’s what I think will happen eventually they can’t keep beating a dead horse forever they will have to come up with something different juicy& scandalous like Williams secret affair

      • swirlmamad says:

        I love the fact they are humiliating themselves by putting through such a stupid lawsuit. I know that I will NEVER click on a DM article to give them any traction, and I think many of us here feel the same.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      @Jais
      https://www.wsj.com/articles/daily-mail-owner-files-antitrust-suit-against-google-11618925778

      They’re mad that their stories don’t come up first when certain names are searched without having to buy ad space from google, allegedly.

      • JT says:

        It seems that their lack of search results for royal coverage is due to the fact that their royals aren’t doing much? What is there to talk about. H&M are gone so the same bullsh*t articles are getting stale. W&K’s zooms are getting tired and it’s not like they are out and about working. Nobody cares about Sofiesta or C&C. Why would people be searching for them? They better tell their buddies at KP to get their asses to work.

      • Lizzie says:

        Maybe folks realizes the dm royal experts are just pr for the rf and nothing more.

      • Sarah says:

        You can only get so much mileage out of who made whom cry until people get bored. There’s not much else to dissect at this point. All this propping up of Kate smells a lot like they’re about to slash the back of her ankles tbh.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Agreatreckoning, I wonder how many Sussex supporters refuse to click on their links, and how that has impacted their revenue. The lawsuit is pretty idiotic in my opinion, but we’ll see how it plays out.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        @Saucy&Sassy-I’m obviously guilty of clicking on the links and it bothers me a bit that I might be contributing to the British Tabloid revenue. I can’t help myself sometimes-probably due to being on a board a long time ago and posters would randomly misquote things and it bugged the f#ck out of my innnate/professional/seeing red flag self. I don’t see that happening here. There is only so much time and space CB can give to each paragraph/article. I love being able to come here to express my opinion and LOL at posters/CB writers comments-in a good way. Seriously, I don’t enjoy my morning coffee as much if I don’t feel like I’m going to spew in laughter at the beautifly crafted comments about the Windsor family in England. Thank you Celebitchy. I will try to not generate more revenue for the nasty ass British tabloids in the future-but, can’t promise out of my nosiness. Been a reader here for a long, long time-didn’t started posting until a month or so ago?.

        I’m not on twitter. Have looked at links posted here and laugh at some of the deranged, conspiracy theories out there by haters/bots/whatever they f$ck they are. Certainly don’t qualify as humans.

        Oh yeah, if the DM is feeling bad that Piers Morgan’s comments aren’t coming up to the top of search sites-they might want to write a big long @ss article that people need to search Piss Morgan instead.

        Who knows what will happen with the lawsuit. Google seems fairly upfront with how things work. In a smaller sense? my husband and I own a business. We have a free google listing. If we want to be the #1 listing, we would maybe have to pay for an ad. Currently, we consistently come up #2 because #1 pays for an ad(sometimes we are #1) with a higher rating over the #1 due to reviews.

        The Daily Mail is not viewed as a reputable source of information(in the States at least)-or others of the same ilk. But, it’s a lot fun poking at their “journalistic integrity”. Especially when it’s against a war veteran and his biracial wife who has done nothing wrong except having fully formed opinions.
        FYI, my posting name comes from the title of one of Louise Penny’s books. Excellent series. Maybe should have gone with Inspector Gamache as a name? Though his character is much nicer than mine.
        https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cop-doc/201911/the-wisdom-chief-inspector-armand-gamache

        Cambridges-Argo f@ck yourselves and your phony devastation.

      • Jais says:

        Thanks for the link! It wouldn’t let me read the full article but I read the beginning. Lol, it makes the DM seem like it’s only about royal news, which I mean it prob is? Not in England so not sure but there’s prob other articles…

  6. Elizabeth Phillips says:

    Not competitive? Don’t these people remember the boat race that she and Will did on tour? She was very competitive that day and you don’t go from that competitive to not competitive at all.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Multiple boat races, the climbing event, all kinds of things. W&K jab at each other in public in a passive aggressive way. Similar to Charles and Diana and the infamous Wales floods and South Korea tours.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Evelyn I understand that that’s absolutely a real thing that happens to people, but I don’t think Kate ever became less competitive. She just had to channel it in different ways when it came to Meghan. I think her competitive spirit is still there. (I also think it’s very possible that she has mental health issues…I sure would if I were in her position. Hopefully she’ll get treatment if needed, but considering the way that family views seeking help — who knows.)

      • windyriver says:

        Simple, fairly recent example of Kate’s competitive nature – a day or two after Meghan appeared in that fabulous blue dress and was snapped in that iconic photo with Harry under the umbrella, Kate was papped (buying children’s books?) in a coat and sweater in virtually the exact same shade of blue. Nothing she’s done since then has given the impression she’s any different than when she did that a year ago.

  7. Apple says:

    I thought Kate was to lazy to be competitive.

    • Becks1 says:

      No – she’s too lazy to work. She’s very competitive. See how much she copies Meghan, even down to copying their zoom room.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Better than copying Dolores Umbridge’s plates on the wall decor.

      • windyriver says:

        Every so often, I try to imagine what Kate is thinking when she does the constant, and very obvious, copying – of Meghan’s clothes, decor (Zoom background), and events (Mary Berry baking show, etc.). One one hand, perhaps she’s concluded, copying what Will was doing ultimately landed her the “prize”, so continues doing the same thing. On the other hand, I wonder if, having no experience of real, hard work at any point in her life, she truly thinks what she’s doing is what hard work is all about. She may just be that dim.

        Probably a combination of the two.

    • Lizzie says:

      I never believed she is lazy, she thinks she is too good to work like the royals who are not married to the heir.

      • Jaded says:

        She’s also too stupid to realize she could improve her image 1,000% by not letting patronages go unfunded until they fold, by aligning herself with Meghan and Harry’s good works and not cold-shouldering them in public. Jealousy and stupidity is a lethal combination.

      • Bess says:

        Kate’s role doesn’t suit her personality or her natural strengths. She could work on improving her ability to make small talk and her public speaking skills, but she doesn’t seem to want to do this or doesn’t know how to do it.

        She could also lean in more to charities that are in her comfort zone like something sports related or centered around family activities. Kate would need to take the initiative to do make a change. Time will tell if she decides to do it.

      • Cessily says:

        @bess if there are issues at home, and this is all about popularity she is totally on the wrong path. Your right she should play to her personality and strengths. The patronage’s you mentioned would work well if she cared about them we might even see some passion from her. The constant fluff with no substance is already stale and souring. It’s like they are stuck in a bad episode of “gossip girl” while the rest of the characters grew up.

      • Dl says:

        @bess yes . she could get help with her public speaking and interaction. The Queen’s father did , The Kings Speech, and so did Princess Diana

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      @windyriver.I see what you’re saying and have tried to go down that road of thinking too. Her sense of self has so been aligned with what her pushy mom wanted her to do and then what the messed up protocols of the BRF expect her to do. She really doesn’t have an individual identity. I don’t feel sorry for her at this point. We all have choices and she is choosing that this is who she wants to be and her relationship “love” with Will is what she’s willing to settle for. She does seem to be a good mom and maybe that’s what the tabs need to focus on instead of her kweenliness because she needs to be seen as something other than a popcorn salad globally. It won’t change that she threw Meghan under the bus though. And that will be hanging over her head world wide. Outside of England’s/BRF’s insular world, Kate is not someone to look up to.

      • Jais says:

        “She needs to be seen as something other than a popcorn salad globally” lol that post was epic and perfect reference

  8. Ariel says:

    Article after article about how aggrieved the racist royals are by the great betrayal of H&M standing up to their constant abuse/ and the articles barely mention – if they mention at all- what those trashy royals put Meghan through.

    • Christine says:

      I have become obsessed, since I’m trapped in my house until I get my second dose, and I’ve been re-reading all of the articles on Meghan, on this site. This one stopped me cold, it was two seconds after Harry and Meghan got engaged. ALL of this was predicted, shockingly accurately, the comment section really says it all. Wills and Kate can bleat all they want about how unfair the entire world is to them, and Harry and Meghan are the ONLY reason why it’s all so hard for them now. No. It is all there to see, from the very beginning, if only one of them, or their people, had bothered to care. They have zero people to blame, but themselves.

      https://www.celebitchy.com/558775/dm_duchess_kate_may_have_difficulty_coping_with_britains_meghan_mania/

      • Nic919 says:

        It seems I quoted Maya Angelou back then and said “when someone shows you who they are, believe them”. The years have only proven just how true that is.

      • Becks1 says:

        oh man. that DM article. Kate described as “mumsy, tired, flat” – their congratulatory language seeming stilted…..when you read that, no wonder the Cambridges had to bring Meghan down. It’s so sad to realize that we all saw it coming.

      • Christine says:

        It gets worse. Every single person on the planet saw this coming, see this article, re. all of the language around Princess Diana and Hasnet Kahn and Dodi Fayed, that showed base level racism. I legitimately need one person in the royal family to acknowledge what they did to Meghan. This one is weeks after their engagement, but it does have Idris Elba, so that’s a bonus.

        It seems to be my life’s work, currently, to find all the ways every single person saw this coming, and yet, AND YET, Meghan was so horribly treated that she thought about suicide. But Wills and Kate think they are the victims. I have no polite words.

        https://www.celebitchy.com/560291/idris_elba_meghan_markle_as_a_person_regardless_of_her_color_is_a_role_model/

  9. Red Snapper says:

    It feels like they’re really yanking at Kate’s leash. I read a couple of pieces talking about the b’day pic of Louis being part of the invisible contract. And the DM has a photo spread of Will and Kate’s “love” and it has many photos of Kate’s rictus grin and one pic of her skirt flying up. And this anniversary is all Kate all the time.

    • Cecilia says:

      That’s what i thought was odd too. These weeks leading up to the anniversary has all been about kate. William is barely mentioned

    • Amy Too says:

      The anniversary coverage being all Kate all the time really goes with my theory that Will or KP has said No to a bunch of sappy anniversary stories about their love and relationship because he wants to get rid of her soon. This piece was basically just a “Kate’s 10 year anniversary joining the firm” article, all about her and her “accomplishments,” with those “accomplishments” being extremely vague statements (all telling, no showing) about her personality/loveliness as opposed to her work. It’s bizarre. It’s not even about their marriage or relationship. They’re acting like Kate was just randomly hired 10 years ago by the Queen, and not like the reason she joined and is a member of the firm is because she married William and they’re in a loving marriage.

      Even the stuff about her being a comfort to William, is more along the lines of him liking the image she projects to the masses and the way that she’s made sure people perceive/embiggen her in a way that directly contrasts with Meghan. When they mention how William feels about Kate or what he likes about her, it’s like he could be talking about a sister or coworker or his housekeeper, and not his wife, the woman he loves and is closest to. There’s nothing he likes or appreciated about her that mentions how she and their relationship and family have changed him for the better as a man, or how he feels emotionally supported, how he feels like he can talk to her about anything and how they give each other great advice and support. It’s all about how her public facing image is comforting to him because he doesn’t have to worry about her making waves like Meghan did. She doesn’t even pretend to be entertaining at home. What a nice spin to put on the house manager quitting, lol, “they’re just too sweet and normal and homey to entertain, so my services weren’t needed! So middle class, just like you!”

      This is all Kate selling herself to the public and to William so that he won’t dump her. A story on a couple’s 10 year wedding anniversary should include much more information and reminiscing about *both* of the people in the couple and it should be about the major milestones in the marriage and how they have grown in relation to each other. This is about how Kate’s PR has “grown” (been embiggened) in relation to Firm PR crises like Harry and Meghan leaving and the Oprah interview. They hardly mention the marriage, love, or an intimate partnership between Will and Kate. Though we do get that William liked her originally because he found her legs to be sexy. The same legs that apparently charmed all of Canada when she flashed them. I’m getting a serious case of “fine, we’ll write your ‘All The Reasons Why William Can’t Break Up With Me’ piece, but we’re not happy about it and we’re going to shade you and embarrass you throughout,” here.

      • Wiglet Watcher says:

        Dead on.
        These articles are all about Kate with rose tinted glasses. Nothing about how happy they are or their accomplishments or their future.

        The end is coming.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      @Red Snapper They are really trying to sell W & K’s “love” hard. The quote in the story when after the wedding ceremony Kate breathlessly asked Will if he was happy and he replied, “I’m so happy your my wife.”. I snort laughed.

      • notasugarhere says:

        So happy to be dragged to the altar by Middleton & Company, he wouldn’t even attend his own wedding rehearsal.

      • Cecilia says:

        @notasugarhere wait— he didn’t attend his own wedding rehearsal? Do you have a link to that article?

      • cassandra says:

        Damn and they try to play it off like he couldn’t get out of RAF duty-as if he hasn’t proven that he’ll skip whatever work commitment he wants if it suits him.

      • Lorelei says:

        Who doesn’t go to THEIR OWN wedding rehearsal?!
        As if they wouldn’t have rearranged the schedule and someone could have just covered for William that one night. Ffs. At least try to make it a believable excuse.

        @AGreatReckoning: I don’t know why that reply, “I’m so happy you’re my wife” is so funny, but it really is! Lmfao. I guess that was the best he could muster, considering we all know he was not at all happy about it. Which actually makes me feel sorry for 2011-Kate.

      • Cessily says:

        Sounds like PH was his cover for a lot.. I know it was a Royal and State affair but it was the coldest wedding I have seen or attended since watching a cousin who “was told to marry or face disgrace” of course that ended well.

      • Dl says:

        Whatever in love means. That’s what it sounded like

      • Red Snapper says:

        I watched they’re wedding live, and when they are pronounced man and wife, Kate looks at him, and Will stares down at his hands (they were kneeling). I’m not truthering this there’s footage.

      • swirlmamad says:

        @Red Snapper, I didn’t see exactly that, but if you look at this vid of the ceremony starting at about 1:19:30, what is so odd is that they are saying their vows and being pronounced man and wife and he does not look at her ONCE. She doesn’t pointedly look his way either, but it’s just the strangest dynamic if they were supposed to be SO in love and marrying their partner. Such a complete contrast to the pure love Meghan and Harry were radiating on their wedding day. You cannot convince me these two are not the embodiment of “Whatever love means.”

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=schQZY3QjCw

    • I can’t forget how William did not even bother to turn around to look at Kate as she walked down the long aisle to the altar where William was. Not a single glance at his future wife. Couldn’t be bothered. It was Harry who did take a look and whispered something to William about how pretty Kate looked. What kind of groom/husband-to-be is that? Now that they’re celebrating their 10th anniversary, who would want to look back at that moment? It was so telling. It became the default mode of their relationship— William doesn’t care to take a look at Kate whenever they’re out in public; he forgets to put an umbrella over her; he leaves her like she’s not there with him. Gosh! 10 years! Whatever love means.

      • MF1 says:

        I rewatched some segments from the link @swirlmamad posted above and YIKES. These two don’t seem in love at all. They aren’t excited, they hardly look at each other. They mostly seem indifferent to one another. A VERY different vibe from M&H on their wedding day.

  10. Thirtynine says:

    I don’t know how they make the leap from ‘Kate is so uncompetitive ‘ as being exemplified by the ‘widely appreciated’ ‘private gesture’ of laying daffodils for Sarah Everard. That little outing sure said a lot about Kate- but being non-competitive was not one of them.

    • A says:

      I deeply dislike how they just slipped in that whole vigil thing. Her appearance there was gross, it was political, and it was truly selfish on the Duchess’s part and somehow it’s also supposed to be the PR win of the year for them.

      • And that she showed up maskless as well. Yet for Phillip’s funeral she had her bespoke mask on with that fascinator. I get that she was forced to wear a mask at funeral, but to show up at a public memorial without one is just the height of self-importance and supreme arrogance. All about making sure the regular 🤡 photographers got her face in the crowd with her flower tribute. This woman just drives me up the wall. She obviously doesn’t give a damn about other women. It’s…Kate, Kate, Kate.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Political and illegal.

    • Kalana says:

      They need to keep Sarah Everhard’s name out of their mouth. That was horrifying. The Everhard family has stayed completely quiet about the pap stunt and leaking the letter. They clearly do not want the public attention for Kate’s pr.

      F*ck Kate and her self-serving bs for that. Seriously. Stick to seeking attention at Prince Philip’s funeral.

      • Merricat says:

        +1

      • swirlmamad says:

        It’s like we all see this and how horribly it reflects on Kate….but they keep pushing this narrative that it was so selfless and kind — this is the stuff that makes me want to spit nails about her. She is the literal worst.

    • February-Pisces says:

      The vigil pr stunt was absolutely panned on twitter and it wasn’t just Sussex squad calling her out. The whole point of the stunt was to make kate look ‘humble’ and ‘caring’ like she just wondered down there all by herself, and she didn’t bring a cameraman with her. The fact they are still bringing this up is disgusting. It’s like the original photo didn’t work, then the letter to the family also didn’t work. Then the keen Guevara piece didn’t work. Now it’s Richard kay’s turn to exploit Sarah’s murder for the benefit of Kate.

      I was thinking, why is it that when other people suffer, Kate benefits. Meghan endures racist abuse via the media for 4 years, and Kate benefits. Sarah Everard is murdered and Kate benefits from “good pr”. When Women at the vigil are beaten and arrested by the police, Kate leaves them to it and then reaps all the benefits of being an ‘activist’ whilst those women were punished. Even prince Phillips funeral, Kate benefits by being declared the best person who ever went to a funeral.

      I hope someone who is close to Sarah openly tells kate to stfu.

      • Jaded says:

        If she’d truly wanted to attend Sarah’s vigil as a show of solidarity with regular women then she should have tied her hair back, put on a hat, glasses and a mask, and blended in with the crowd instead of dragging along a videographer and a pack of RPOs. That she took advantage of a horrific murder in such a public manner to appear like “I’m mourning just like all of you!” was a grave tactical error and totally transparent.

      • Lorelei says:

        ITA with every one of these comments — either they’re so tone-deaf that they don’t realize how poorly her transparent vigil stunt was received, or they don’t care and are determined to keep telling us the opposite of what we know to be true.

        I agree with Kalana that the fact that Sarah Everard’s family has been completely silent and not put out a statement thanking Kate or whatever should be their cue to SHUT UP about it and never mention Sarah’s name ever again in relation to Kate. But they shouldn’t have ever spoken about it again in the first place! If it was truly a small, sincere act that was personally important to Kate, it wouldn’t keep popping up in every single article about her.

        The fact that they even used her vigil in the first place is so vile, and to keep harping on it weeks later…the instincts of their team of advisers is so poor that it’s actually stunning to me that no one at the palace sees this.

  11. Emily says:

    I find it so weird how the royal PR just repeats the same tired talking points to the same diminishing audience (basically right-wing Daily Mail reader types) over and over again. When are they going to see that it’s not working?

    • MsIam says:

      They’ve got nothing else to use. They’ve got 10-15 years to wait until the Cambridge kids grow up and William takes the throne.

      • JT says:

        Yep. The Keens are boring and don’t do anything of note. They barley work enough to sustain any content. It’s why those RRs jump at the chance to still write about H&M. At least the Sussexes are interesting and work. Even in their absence there is a always something to say. It still blows my mind why they worked with KP to smear Meghan, when she was making them so much money. “More than Diana did”. She brought back so much interest in royal stories and they were getting calls for interviews in America. Now they are stuck with writing the same 50 embiggening stories about Kate a day, with not an end in sight. Because no, the Cambridges aren’t going to step up and work more after Philip’s passing.

      • Sarah says:

        Andrew and all of his crimes are literally *right there* if they need something to talk about.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Emily imo it works *just* enough on their core audience that it makes it worthwhile for them to continue repeating this bs week after week. I’m only going by what I see on Twitter, so it’s not representative of the UK as a whole by any means, but the hard-core royalists and her fans eat it up. They retweet every one of these puff pieces with lots of emojis and comments about how regal and wonderful Catherine is, even when she’s at a funeral or being blatantly rude like she was at the CW service. It’s a joke.

      None of her sycophants will ever say anything rational like, “I love Catherine, but I don’t think it’s in the best taste for her to keep bringing up Sarah Everard.” It’s all 100% “She’s so elegant!! We’re so lucky she’s going to be our Queen ❤️👑❤️👑🥰” all the time. They’re not people who anyone takes seriously, but I guess the palace only cares that they’re out there pushing the desired narrative online.

      @Sarah from what I’ve seen, most of these same people DEFEND Andrew. “Innocent until proven guilty” (which, of course, but then he should agree to sit his ass down with the FBI). “He needs to be judged in a court of law, not the court of public opinion!” Fair, but again, as long as he continues to dodge accountability, this isn’t going to happen. And my favorite is “He’s not a pedo; 16 is the age of consent in the UK!” As if that makes it okay that he was raping a trafficked teenager?

      Imagine your best argument is, “He’s not a pedophile, he’s an ephebophile!”
      There are people who say this sincerely, over and over again, as if it’s a positive thing for Andrew, something that proves he’s not culpable of any wrongdoing. It’s incredible.

      They conveniently neglect ALL of the evidence pointing to Andrew being guilty, not innocent, and gloss over the fact that they’re essentially calling Virginia a liar.

      • Tessa says:

        It bothers me when Victim Blaming goes on to those who want to give Andrew a Free Pass. Some women have been reluctant to come forward due to victim shaming. These women were trafficked at Age 12 or 13 and were not “free” to walk from being held captive by Epstein and Maxwell.

  12. Jais says:

    Using the word “sullen” to describe Meghan’s disappointment. GTFOH

    • I caught that too, JAIS. Using the term, sullen, to describe years of racist bullying is a new one.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Yes. Using sullen to describe Meghan and her experiences there is unmitigable. Meghan f*cking worked and showed up while still managing to smile during her engagements(while being bullied for all things) and it’s not because she’s a good actress. It’s because she knows how to live in the present moment and do the work. Kate’s inability-2020 Commonwealth Day-to acknowledge Harry & Meghan and scowly face throughout exemplifies why she isn’t queen/queen consort material. Amongst other things.

    • Emily says:

      “Sullen” to describe “suicidal”. It’s disgusting.

      • Talia says:

        Also ‘sullen’ is what Victorians used to describe unsatisfactory housemaids and modern people use to describe teenagers. It is not usually used to describe an adult woman.

  13. Becks1 says:

    I don’t understand why they push the narrative that she’s not competitive. It’s the one consistent thing we’ve heard about her for 18 years. Her being competitive is something that makes her interesting in a way bc it gives her some life. Being competitive is okay. Being bitchy, vindictive and petty towards your SIL is not.

    And omg to the descriptions of M as “sullen” and Harry as “petulant.” Right, because what Kate faced is the same as what Meghan faced. These people.

    • cassandra says:

      It’s shame because if Kate had leaned into that competitive, sporty girl persona from the get go she’d be much more likable and interesting.

      She’s never had a work ethic, but it really seems like she’s made herself extra bland on purpose. What are her (palace sanctioned) personality traits besides mother/wife/future queen?

    • Lizzie Bathory says:

      I’ve long thought they should have made sport/fitness Kate’s “issue,” rather than early childhood development. She is competitive, enjoys sports & might even reliably turn up to bat her eyes at male athletes. But I guess they sort of earmarked that for William so he can drink with footballers.

      • notasugarhere says:

        She’s not a team player, never has been. As others have said, she isn’t sporty she’s a gym rat. Add in her obsessive working out and diet issues, which don’t make her a positive role model for anyone.

      • Lizzie Bathory says:

        I mean, I don’t disagree, nota. I just think sport would be less transparently embarrassing than her 5 question survey or her expertise in log design. But I guess if you put her around male athletes too much she might have flashed more people, so it’s probably lose-lose.

    • Lemons says:

      It’s because she has lost the one competition that mattered post-marriage to William. She’s not the best royal, not the best young royal and isn’t even the best (young) duchess. Everyone around Kate knows that she just doesn’t stack up.

      So now we have to pretend that Kate just wasn’t trying because it’s not in her personality. LOL

    • Jay says:

      I think “not competitive” is the way they are choosing to spin a certain lack of focus and ambition. It’s not that she’s lazy, she’s just not trying!

      Kate’s a “nice girl” who will be satisfied with her place and won’t upset the apple cart by trying to have ideas or any such nonsense. Good old Kate, you won’t see her trying to answer questions or have opinions of her own – not like some uppity actresses we could name, hmm?

      Just imagine if your BEST quality as an employee was your lack of ambition. (And, maybe, that you flashed everyone at the office Xmas party ten years ago).

      • Wiglet Watcher says:

        I read this new not competitive angle as defensive.
        Kate doesn’t compete because Kate does not challenge her husband or the institution. Meghan challenges everyone to be their best. Kate goes with what she is told. Kate doesn’t question her husband. The tides are turning.

  14. Guestwho says:

    I shouldn’t be, but I am absolutely flabbergasted by this disingenuous re-writing of history. I mean, seriously! She’s not competitive? That used to be her “thing” right? She settled right in to royal life? They weren’t full time royals until around 4 or 5 years ago. Why have they forgotten the other times she’s shown her long and shapely legs (and ass) at official events? The patronages not visited, the speeches mumbled and botched, the initiatives that go nowhere, the husband getting caught dad-dancing instead of attending the Commonwealth events, that same weasel husband and his intimate “dinners” with neighbor Rose, the being an a-hole to Bea and Eugenie, the being an a-hole to women that dated Harry – erghh they’ve made me care about all that crap because they’re creating this June Cleaver-esq persona to sell to the frothing royalist masses.

    And the crap about Meghan (and Harry I guess)…I can’t even. Just flat-out bullshit – at whose behest? The palace, Carole, rage-aholic Cain? When are the crisis manager starting? The first thing (maybe the only thing) they need to do is put a stop to this nonsense. They are only highlighting to people not in thrall to the royals just how awful this family is.

    I ask again for the 800th time – WTF is wrong with these people?

  15. Elvie says:

    Ew. Since when do Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy think they speak for us Canadians? Hard pass on Kate’s ass flash.

    • Bellaluna McKenzie says:

      Right? I’m a Canadian-born American and I was appalled by Kate’s flashing. It sure did not make me or any of my friends ‘fond’ of her.

      If anything, it made me very unimpressed. Only gotten worse since then, veering into complete annoyance and abhorrence from the very beginning of the smear campaign against Meghan.

      These two ‘royal reporters’ wannabe experts’ can go suck eggs and take a class on recognizing self-projection. I cannot speak for all Canadians but that sure isn’t my opinion.

      • Izzy says:

        Well, you can speak for this Canadian living in America. I feel the same way. I doubt it’s just us.

    • Jay says:

      Yeah, that description is so gross. I remember William and Kate’s visit to Canada, and I don’t remember this flashing moment at all – maybe because I wasn’t following royal news that much, but probably because it would have been seen as embarrassing and crass to mention in news coverage, let alone having it described a decade later as the way in which she “charmed” Canadians. How demeaning.

      I can’t think of any public figure for whom it would be acceptable to describe them as having “long and shapely legs” in the 21st century. Super creepy.

      • Nic919 says:

        I remember when they went to Ottawa for Canada Day for their first tour but I don’t think the ass flash was covered in canadian media. I don’t recall hearing about it until much later and it came up because by then there had been multiple ass flashing incidents on more than one tour.

      • Jay says:

        @nic919 That was my recollection, too. I remember lots of coverage of her outfits, but not flashing. And if you think about it, it would be strange for any media outlets to publish something that would embarrass a new royal on her first visit. Maybe a tabloid like the Sun would have, but I didn’t hear a word about it at the time!

        Apparently, though, these two “experts” think about that incident from ten years ago All. The. Time. (Ick)

  16. equality says:

    So saying it’s been devastating to go it alone isn’t complaining? And what has Kate gotten on with? Why not a list of what she’s accomplished? How did Meghan not get on with it? I’m sure there could be quite a list of what she accomplished, even while pregnant. There are no schools near Anmer or just none posh enough or what? Do the tabloid readers not get tired of the same stale narrative?

    • JT says:

      That part blew my mind. If they were worried about going at alone, maybe don’t smear the two actually working. It also makes it seem like they were a team or something. Like they were working together. And they aren’t alone. She’s got the global statesman and he’s got the savior of the monarchy beside him. And Kate hasn’t gotten in with anything except figure out how to work less.

  17. Over it says:

    Carole Jenner and Karen keen are mad mad that the world will forever now know that she is waity . Willy ain’t mad about that. He kept her hanging for years while he sowed his oats . So come again richy .

  18. Loretta says:

    This is so embarassing.

  19. Mooshe1 says:

    These people think this is a boost Kate article??? It’s a let’s dig at Meghan article. They and the royal family are in their feelings because no only is Meghan more popular, she’s not going to have anything to do with the press, the RF didn’t crush her, when she left Harry went with her, and she called all of them out in that interview. This article makes Kate look frivolous and weak. The part about her flashing the public and her shapely legs is kinda creepy, the dirty old men

    • Sophie says:

      I was so creeped out by the writing style, too! The way the flashing incident was written up is so gross and bizarre.

    • Cessily says:

      Why do all these articles act like she as Meghan knew nothing about the BRF and how things worked..
      Kate is British from a wealthy working class family, they are very rich but a poor Aristocrat is still so much better. She and her entire family knew exactly what she was walking into. Maybe not the day to day details but the social caste system and catty passive aggressiveness of people who think birth above achievements.
      Meghan grew up in LA, I’m sure she knew very well when someone was a “mean girl” and how to spot discrimination and racism. We don’t have an Aristocratic society here we have various people of wealth from lotto winners to old money that can be traced to the original landing. This was a woman who spoke to the UN had success in both work and philanthropy. She wasn’t dreaming of a title. Comparison are ridiculous when just being British gave Kate a lot more knowledge, and the well documented history of Kate speaks for itself.
      (Looks like they even had to add H&M to their anniversary to get interest.. oh and the house description was a ridiculous jab at the California home that his brother bought. Buying your own home isn’t Royal)

      • Carrie says:

        Prince Charles fled to a house he purchased in Wales following Phillip’s funeral.
        Goalposts are moved the Whole time.
        Balmoral was either given to the Queen Mother or purchased depends on the article one is reading.

  20. truthSF says:

    Oh tabloids! Harry and Meghan are not in exile, they’re absolutely free to live the best live they and their children can possibly live! We know, they exiled you guys from profiting off of them, and y’all are still are having withdrawal from that cold ✂️!!😂😂😂🤣

    • SarahCS says:

      Yes, I caught that. Nice try. If that’s what ‘exile’ looks like please tell me here I sign.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        truthSF and SarahCS, do the brf really want the “we exiled them” narrative going forward? Would that benefit them in some way?

  21. Gk says:

    I don’t understand how the people writing this don’t get it. Would they be willing to live as second best ? Never having the opportunity to shine? At least trying to win? Because that’s what the spares in monarchy are. Notice Amner is described as acres of land, tennis court, pool though the spare had a nice home it is nowhere near that and that is the crux of the issue. Would you stay in the family firm as second in command( and that is only until the heir’s children grow up) or strike out on your own? It is so weird to me that the British press/ people don’t seem to get this.

  22. Sue says:

    What exactly are they going alone? Signing into Zoom a few times a week? Devastating.

    • MsIam says:

      I thought they had Sophie to pick up the slack? I guess since the Cambridges are so dull and boring they are going to use “long suffering” as their trademark image now.

      • Amy Too says:

        I also don’t get how they think it’s good PR for the royal family to constantly be like “woe is me!!! We have to do more stuff with the peasants now! We’re being forced to visit charities you care about and interact with you people against our will. We are super pissed off at having to do the work, and we will whine about it and complain about it, and demand to be praised for stoically suffering through our meet and greets with you nasty, boring, no good plebs for the rest of time!” Is the class structure so ingrained in the U.K. that normal everyday non aristo people feel like the royals SHOULD be petulant and fussy about deigning to come out and speak with them?

        Is this relationship acceptable to them? When the people are meant to stand and cheer and curtesy and bow and never turn their back on, and never sit down in the presence of, and act like it’s a HUUUGE honor to get a glimpse of the royal family while the royals literally have newspapers write over and over and over again about how unhappy and put out they are about having to go out and see those very same people who slavishly celebrate them and line the streets cheering to get a glimpse of them on their wedding days? Is that part of the mystique? “We hate leaving the palace to come and see you, therefore it is a hugely special occasion that you should be especially grateful for when we come out and sniff in the general direction of your town fair”?

        I just don’t get how this is meant to sell the family as likable and “the nation’s family,” a family that you want to pay for, and read about, and support, and show up for, and vote to keep in power when the chance comes up. We’re usually meant to say that they do a bunch of good works and therefore they’re helpful, but they’re literally screaming at the top of their lungs that they hate doing the good works and feel like they’ve been “thrown under a bus” because they might have to think about doing marginally more good works. Is this the general attitude to work in the U.K.? Like everyone hates their job and does it against their will because they have to, so the RF acting the same way is acceptable and understandable?

    • Lizzie says:

      Where are the rest of the malignant 7?

    • MF1 says:

      I know, right? Meghan had to deal with suicidal thoughts, constant attacks by the press, racism towards her and her son, worry that her husband would get murdered after his security was stripped away with no notice, and moving her family across a nocean to escape her bigoted, abusive in-laws.

      But sure, this past year has been totally devastating for Kate.

  23. Smices says:

    How can any of this be true. We weee told just a couple of days ago about how much calmer and nicer life was with the Sussexes on the other side of the world. And weren’t they trying to exile them to Africa? But now it’s so difficult shouldering the burden alone?

    Someone better tell Uncle Gary because according to him the Cambridge’s are ready to take the throne. Just as soon as the Queen kindly steps aside and Charles is found something else to do instead of the job he’s spent half a decade preparing for.

  24. Amy Bee says:

    The Palace still don’t get that the way they did things with other married ins would not have worked for a black American woman who had worked her whole life. Worse yet they made the environment so hostile for Meghan that she had to leave in order to survive.

    • equality says:

      It didn’t exactly “work” with Diana and Fergie either, did it? And you mean married-in women. The men aren’t abused.

      • Amy Bee says:

        True but I’m speaking to the palace’s view that their system works well and that Meghan was the problem.

      • notasugarhere says:

        The men who marry in don’t become working royals. Who knows what courtiers might have done to Snowdon, Mark Phillips, or Tim Laurence if they’d been out there doing engagements ‘in competition’ with Philip, Charles, Kents, Gloucesters, Andrew, etc.

      • equality says:

        Diana, Fergie and Meghan stopped being “working” royals and were/are still being attacked in the media.

    • Tessa says:

      In a sense Snowdon was a working royal because he took portraits of the RF. The Queen Mother was said to have been fond of him.

      • FicklePickle says:

        True, but his was probably the form of married-in royal work the Firm would appreciate the most – being behind the camera and out of the picture, literally putting all eyes on the Royals themselves. It’s the physical manifestation of exactly what the institution wants all married-ins to do.

  25. Cafecito says:

    She didn’t adapt to anything, this was already her identity.
    Want to see some adaptation? Let’s get get to work

  26. Chartreuse says:

    Sugar and shade in the one article about Keen and Willnot. That was pretty funny.

  27. Chaine says:

    Thank goodness Wills had his pool and tennis court to soothe his grief over his grandads death 🙄

  28. Mooney says:

    ‘Thank goodness Catherine at least was able to adapt to her new life without any fuss. I can’t recall her complaining about anything.’

    Why would she even complain? Of course she would adapt. This is the life she wanted, this is what she stalked Cain for a decade and wasted her 20s. My family would throw me out if I was wasting my life for a guy like that, specially who was so disrespectful to their daughter.

    “their son Archie and his yet-to-be-born sister will know next to nothing of their cousins George, Charlotte and Louis…Whether this royal rift can ever properly be healed remains a matter of considerable conjecture. Amid such heartfelt dismay, Anmer, with its swimming pool and tennis court and open acres, has been a refuge for William and Kate.”

    Cain and Unable couldn’t even fake happiness for Archie’s birth. Nobody’s forgotten “I already have a nephew”. And Unable still made it about her kids. And are we suddenly talking about the X£ million estate with a tennis court and pool? Will there be a gym and cinema too?

    And Woldemort angry that they called her Waity Katie? Please! He and his circle of friends called her mattress, doormat, doors manual, etc. She was passed around among his friends, and was his sidepiece while he had a girlfriend.

    • Sofia says:

      Wrong place!

    • notasugarhere says:

      She’s complained about plenty, via Palace slapping down things about her obvious wiglets to her mummy leaking any info Kate/Carole wanted out. She even publicly complained about working more than 100 hours during the Jubilee year, said it was a whirlwind and she was looking forward to doing less.

    • Cessily says:

      I notice the they are never PW or K nephew or future niece.. the connection is never referenced but it is Uncle Harry not visiting his Nephews and Niece after his year in exile.
      Words have power, and this says a lot.

      • ABritGuest says:

        Cessily good point about no mentions of Archie as William’s nephew. I said this on another post. There’s never any fan fiction about William missing Archie or sending him presents etc- even when they had those obviously untrue stories last year about the brothers starting to repair their relationship & zooming away from their wives. Or when they had those reports about Charles, the queen missing Archie.

      • ennie says:

        ABritGuest, but remember how William has never ever referenced Archie in any way. The time he was asked about him, at his birth, he said “but I am already an uncle”, dismissive of Archie at the time his first nephew from his only brother, upping Pippa’s kid who he is not related by blood.
        That right there was VERY telling, but of course royal reporters don’t dare mentioning dear wills faults, they only write fanfic that lifts the keens.

    • HeatherC says:

      I take such objection to “their son Archie and his yet-to-be-born sister will know next to nothing of their cousins George, Charlotte and Louis…”

      I grew up (and still live in) the US. I have cousins in Canada, Ireland and Poland, Russia. I grew up with contact through letter writing and later email and phone calls with all of them, even Poland and (then) USSR during the waning days of the Cold War. It can be done. It takes a little work but can be done. Now I talk with them over Zoom and connect through social media (the only reason I still have Facebook).

      Besides, when they lived in the same country, how much contact did they have with each other? How much interest did Charlotte and George show toward Archie at the polo match?

      Pass me by with this BS.

  29. Sofia says:

    “I can’t recall her complaining about anything”

    Isn’t this the same woman who complained about one mean Tatler article for a good few months? Yes it was classist but if it was written about Meghan and she sent threatening letters to Tatler, it would be these reporters telling her to let it go and stop being so whiny.

    • MsIam says:

      They are still complaining and mad about the Oprah interview and its going on two months!

  30. Julia K says:

    As a woman of a certain age, I can identify with Camilla, to an extent. How enraged she may be as she and others are spoonfed all this “Kate the Great” drivel and “Queen in waiting” stuff. Does Camilla say in private to Charles, ” what about ME? I’ll be queen consort first, sweetie”. This usurper needs to be taken down a peg? Wait for it; subtle action will be taken from Clarence House.

    • Bellaluna McKenzie says:

      Honestly, it makes me feel for and appreciate Camilla’s class and quietness even more.

      But yes, Kate desperately need to be taken down several pegs.

      • Tessa says:

        I don’t think Camilla likes Kate and doesn’t like the Next Queen Kate drivel. But she just had to go and smirk with Kate at the sermon and M and H’s wedding.

      • Pepperpot says:

        Camilla, the one that carried on an affair with a married man? Camilla has no class or self-respect.

      • Tessa says:

        Camilla Did speak to the Sun Editor (Stuart Higgins said this) for ten years to get her side in during the Diana years she really did not “keep quiet”. She is out for herself, always has been. She may want to cater to William for when he becomes King. I don’t think she’s anyone Harry and/or Meghan can look to for help. FOr that matter Charles is not one to count on either.

      • Bellaluna McKenzie says:

        @Pepperpot

        Compared to Kate, Camilla is very classy. Sure, she made a lot of mistakes in her life but who hasn’t? I love Princess Diana and I used to resent Camilla for all the heartache but as I grew up, I learned to recognized that a lot of that lays at Charles’ feet.

        @Tessa

        With the keeping quiet part, I meant toward that stupid embiggening-Kate drivel. Camilla acts as if it the desperate attempts by the Middleton Clan (and their momager) is flying over her head, not bothering her. She sure isn’t showing off her arse like Kate did with Meghan and Harry at the Commonwealth ceremony. She has it in herself to just smile, be polite, do what she has to do and be on her way.

      • Monica says:

        Camilla is at the age where one stops GAF. Let the children and the BM do their thing. She has what she wants, for better or worse.

    • Pix says:

      Oh I think Camilla is getting a kick out of this whole “Kate the Great” campaign. Camilla has seen and been through too much to be threatened by the likes of the amateur Middleton PR machine. She’s loving every second of this theater – because that’s what it is – and she’s patiently waiting for the second act.

    • Jaded says:

      Both Camilla and Charles seem to me to be the type who will quietly let Keen and Mean have lots of rope with which to hang themselves when the time is ripe. That will likely be when the Queen either passes or hands Charles the King Regent reins. They you’ll see the noose tightening.

      • Tessa says:

        I am disappointed with Charles he let William run rampant and oust Harry and Meghan. I don’t think Camilla cares–she did smirk with Kate about the sermon at Harry and Meghan’s wedding. Charles should have nipped this in the bud.

    • Tessa says:

      It also sounds like she’s usurping Charles and William. No articles about William being the Next King.

      • Truthiness says:

        The embiggening of Kate seems a quid pro quo for keeping her mouth shut about Will’s infidelity and lack of time parenting. The royals above Kate understand and do not want a repeat of Diana’s complaints about infidelity.

      • Tessa says:

        Her embiggening probably does not mean there is a great love between herself and William. Something probably Kate is seething about but she has to put up and shut up.

    • Nic919 says:

      I think Camilla knows that she has 100% support from Charles so she may not be bothered with the sad puff pieces coming from both Billy and cathy’s separate PR.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        I believe that Camilla has always had self-confidence, self-awareness and a big jar of not giving any f@cks. From what I have read/watched, Camilla’s personality has always been her own. Whether people like it or not-she really hasn’t kowtowed to anyone. Way back when I thought Camilla was some nefarious man stealing person. If there is one person who has never pretended to be something they’re not, in the Windor family in England, it is probably Camilla. Being an American I may not know all the details and rumors..that’s what she seems to me. I kind of like the idea of a consort who gives no fucks..talk about modernizing the monarchy! That is what Charles should truly be ashamed about and wasn’t willing to provide protection for-that the woman his son Harry loves-embodies similar strengths in the woman he loves and more or less risked his reputation for.

    • NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

      I genuinely believe Camilla has a lot of regrets in life and joining the family is one of them.

      • Tessa says:

        I don’t think Camilla has a single regret. This is what she wanted from the second she became Charles’ married mistress. She got perks, bling, and flattery from Charles’ buddies. But she has one thing that also is a help, she kept her own house to retreat to.

      • notasugarhere says:

        She never wanted to marry Charles, either back in the day or in 2005. In a way this life is exactly what she didn’t want, a public role.

    • Carrie says:

      Does Camilla choke down her bile re the Keen embiggening juuuuust in case Charles (touch wood and God forbid), passes and she would then be dependant on William’s largesse?

  31. ShazBot says:

    This explains a lot actually.
    When they keep repeating that “Meghan threw Kate under the bus in the Oprah interview”, we all assumed it was the crying story. But actually, her real crime was using the term “Waity Katie” because those loons thought…what? That it had left the collective memory??
    They really think they’re going for a younger generation eh?

    • Beach Dreams says:

      Yup. When that Waity Katie clip aired, I had a feeling that would piss her and her mother off even more. The nickname was definitely well-known back then, but having it revived a decade later + social media = a LOT more people being reminded or even learning about it for the first time. To be a fly on the wall when Kate saw that clip…

    • JoJo says:

      The Waity Katie clip wasn’t even part of the main interview. The Waity Katie nickname was probably sanctioned by the palace. After all they do like their petty nicknames. Keen’s reported reaction to the interview would suggest that she is too thin skinned to be a QC.

  32. aquarius64 says:

    The Keenbridges are upset that Sussexit exposes how unfit for purpose they are for the throne.

  33. Agreatreckoning says:

    Kate is now a devastated rock. It is probably overwhelming to have to actually work now and not just take credit for someone else’s work.

    LOL. Story is suppose to include fresh accounts from people close to the couple. They cite palace figure, close friend, house manager. Apparently W & K are only close with people who have no names. Except we know they are close to the tabloid writers who are willing to assign their names to the schlock.

    • Amy Too says:

      And that wasn’t even a direct quote from the house manager to the paper, it was filtered through a “friend” that the house manager supposedly spoke to about why he quit.

      As he told friends, ‘It was a shame because they are such nice people and I was really fond of them.’

      That was really such a bizarre little tidbit, I wonder why it was included? If this is meant to be a shade under sugar piece, I’m wondering if talking about how the house manager quit is supposed to remind us of all the other people who quit early on because they didn’t want to work for W and K? Reading the thing about the house manager immediately made me go “wait, is this the same person who quit because the Middletons all moved in and wouldn’t leave and everyone was being very grand and demanding?” There’s really no reason to randomly bring up that a house manager, for whatever reason, quit almost a decade ago in this kind of piece. What was the point if not to make us think about all the other staff that quit and didn’t have such nice things to say about them?

      • Agreatreckonging says:

        It was incredibly odd and random that the “house manager” thing was brought up. Grasping for straws where no straws exist? Or, like you and other posters said, sugar and shade? Does Eminem have a rap that goes along with the sugar and shade theme?(I’m not up on all his stuff) Loved seeing his Stan one referenced on the older Dan Wootton love letter to Will thread/post.

      • notasugarhere says:

        The house manager here is ‘named’ as being male. The housekeeper who quit because of the Middletons moving in was female. They’ve lost at least three female housekeepers at Anmer in six years iirc.

        The housekeeper at KP is female, Antonella Fresolone, hired in Spring 2013 before they even moved to Apartment 1A. They hired her while they were still at NottCott and doing 7 million in reno at 1A. So now we’ve learned they have both a Senior Housekeeper who heads up a large staff and a house manager at either KP or Anmer. They hired an additional housekeeper (deputy to Fresolone) last year, at least they advertised for one.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Rock or millstone around William’s neck?

    • Nic919 says:

      What is a house manager compared to a house keeper? Is that a new name for butler? It doesn’t sound very common to me.

  34. JT says:

    I see they threw in that tidbit of William wanting to live at Anmer full time. Gee I wonder why?

    • MsIam says:

      The neighbors are so nice and friendly? I read they will even fix you dinner when your spouse is away and accompany you on long walks in the rose gardens.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Well, Wood Farm is empty now that Philip has passed. William could be living there already, separate from Kate and away from the prying eyes of staff at the main house.

      • JT says:

        Maybe the next zoom room will be in Wood Farm’s living room. It’ll be a lot easier to do those long walks away from the prying eyes of the queen’s staff at Sandringham.

      • Nic919 says:

        Philip has been at Windsor since last year so William has likely been set up in Wood Farm for several months. And it would also explain the zoom room set up in Sandringham because that would be closer for William to go to then to bother getting in the car and going to Anmer.

        When did the lockdown first start in the UK? I am going to say that William was set up at Wood Farm when that took place.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Makes sense, as Wood Farm has been empty since Spring 2020. First lockdown was announced 23/25 March. Queen and Philip were already at Windsor, stayed the rest of spring and summer. They moved to Balmoral in August, lots of protest, and returned to Windsor. Stayed at Windsor for Christmas, no return to Sandringham, and remained at Windsor until Philip passed away.

        There was a blip in reporting Oct/Nov when there was talk the Queen was at Windsor and Philip at Sandringham, or that both had spent a bit of time at Sandringham after returning from Scotland. That was quickly followed with news of both moving to Windsor and staying put, likely because of anger about their estate hopping during a pandemic.

  35. Eleonora says:

    I might feel sorry for them if they had a history of working hard.

    #lazy

  36. Shannon says:

    The BM are really working over time with this nonsense. It bugs them that she doesn’t get the same press that Meghan gets. The narratives about them speak for themselves. Meghan is ambitious, speaks her mind, and is glamorous. Catherine, the artist formally known as Kate, is solid, demure, and patient in the background. In other words, boring and bland.

  37. MsIam says:

    Richard Kay is really a mean spirited SOB, lol. The contempt he has for William and especially Kate is so obvious. I think he’s really pissed at them for running Harry and Meghan out of town and now he stuck writing about their boring selves. Plus he knows the rose bush story and is probably pissed he can’t go all in on that juicy news.

    • JT says:

      I think Kay was the one who said he missed H&M. He also might have been the one to say that Meghan made more money for them than Diana. I could be wrong though, as all of these RRs are starting to blend in together.

  38. Sparky says:

    1. So William would prefer to be at Anmer full time???? Tending Rose bushes??

    2. Kate adapted to her new life without fuss? Yeah, she just skipped the traditional St. Pat’s Day celebration (with the adorbs Domhnall the doggo) because she didn’t want them to expect she’d be there every year.

    • Jaded says:

      I think William would prefer to be anywhere other than with his wife and kids. He certainly isn’t winning any Father of the Year awards from what I can see. He’s a lout and a skirt-chaser who would rather be down the pub with his louche friends swilling beer, watching footie and pulling hot blondes.

  39. MangoAngelesque says:

    She’s not competitive, she’s just insecure and wildly jealous of other women. That’s why you literally never see or hear or of her with any women not related to or employed by her. She just can’t handle it.

  40. Merricat says:

    This only makes me more disgusted by the lengths Kate will go to duck accountability. She made that bed.

  41. Gabby says:

    I may be jumping the gun here because this could be on deck for tomorrow, but what is up with the latest Uncle Gary DM piece? That the crown should skip over Charles’ head directly to Will, and “they can find Charles a role”. Really? Is this Middleton-sanctioned PR, or has Uncle Hookers and Blow gone rogue? He sank to some Thomas Markle levels of stupidity, and I don’t see how it does W&K any good. Not that I am bothered by that of course.

    • RedWeatherTiger says:

      “Uncle Hookers and Blow” is my favorite thing today, so thank you! 😀

    • IRMAVEP says:

      Gabby. What better reference would a Queen in Waiting need than an endorsement from her your coke-addled, street-pissing, wife-beating uncle? I mean – the crown’s already hovering over her head! Whooooops!

    • Jaded says:

      Ma Midd is really scraping the bottom of the barrel sanctioning this sh*t from a bottom-feeder like Uncle Snorty isn’t she. I think it’s called desperation — the Keen’s marriage is circling the drain and IF (big if) William decides to pull the plug the Middletons will be gone from royal circles for the most part and completely lose any status with the toffs.

      • equality says:

        She may be cutting her own throat by going up against Charles. If Will does want to divorce her, Charles will be more likely to back him up on it if he’s truly ticked off over her PR.

    • Iriser says:

      I’m wondering about the Uncle Gary piece, too. For me, it reads like a shot across the bow to Kate and the Middletons, a pretty clear warning that they could do to Kate (via Uncle Gary) just what they did to Meghan (via her horrible father) — give him article after article, platform after platform to just talk and talk and talk. Lots of salt-and-sugar press from/about the Cambridges lately. Can’t wait to read the CB analysis and comments about this — y’all are teaching me so much about how this all works!

  42. TeamMeg says:

    What a load of BULL
    Laid on a pile of SHADE
    More lies about Harry & Meghan, to be expected—
    but they really can’t stand Kate, either…
    This is just 100% poison sugar.

  43. NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

    I doubt William and Kate have lived together since before Louis was born. I also think Carole is on the outs with William and that’s the deal with these sickeningly puff pieces about Kate. I doubt William cares about his anniversary at this juncture. I do think that because of the unpopularity and backlash his father received, William will never divorce Kate but I do think they lead largely separate lives. I do think William is skilled at bringing her out just enough to avoid suspicion.

    • Bess says:

      If they are living apart, I wonder how much time William actually spends with those three kids.

      • NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

        I think the better question is “How interested is William in seeing the kids?” I doubt Kate is overly interested in the kids unless there is a photo to be taken. Nanny Maria seems like the one doing all the heavy lifting and she is the only one who gives me any kind of hope that those poor children will be even remotely alright.

    • Nic919 says:

      I think it goes back further than that. I think they have had two separate places since the beginning. It just became more obvious with lockdown when a presumably happily married family would all be living in the same house.
      Early on prior to kids Kate was seen in London and Buckleberry far more than Anglesey, even though William was supposed to be working at the RAF base. And then when they were originally supposed to start full time work and before the part time search and rescue job was made public, they were given Anmer and Apt1 and KP at the same time.

      Add to that the helicopter that William used to go back and forth and with more privacy when he lands at KP, and stories of kate only being seen in outings with the kids and it suggests that neither was in the same location except for public engagements.

      • NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

        You probably aren’t wrong but the cracks and contempt for Kate really started to become noticable post-Louis. The affair leaked 1 year later.

      • notasugarhere says:

        William’s contempt for Kate? He’s shown that from the time they first started dating. It was out in the open during the Jubilee celebrations, and during all of their tours.

      • NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

        Fair point, my friend Notasugathere. But am I crazy or did the contempt and disdain get worse and more blatant after Louis?

      • Nic919 says:

        I think the change you are picking up on is that Kate has changed her reactions to him. She used to do the puppy dog look at him while he was turned away not looking at her. She isn’t doing that anymore which makes William’s contempt look more evident.

      • Becks1 says:

        @NotSoSimple – I think Nic is right, the contempt became more obvious because Kate isn’t playing along anymore (shrug-gate, anyone?)

        It’s also an interesting theory Nic, about having separate houses the whole time, because they are rarely seen together, and I don’t think EVER seen together with the kids. Like once in a while we get a story about them dropping down to the local pub, but it seems like a really obvious stunt – William is always having a pint, Kate is always having white wine – we never hear or see William out and about in Norfolk or London and never heard about him in Anglesey. Kate is papped once in a great while with the kids but that’s it (and I know they usually get the kid pics deleted, but we still at least get the story, like the time a year or two ago when Kate was grocery shopping, etc). We never get anything like that about William. Maybe the press just shuts it all down, but if I were William and I really wanted to push the whole “I’m just like you” image, I would have someone local share that William was at the local pub watching a soccer match or that he was seen on a hike with George or something, even if its totally false. We get those stories about Kate ,but never about William and the kids.

  44. IRMAVEP says:

    Do my eyes deceive me? Can the polycephalic Kay/Levy horror really claim of Kate ‘ I can’t recall her complaining about anything.’ Might I refer it/them to Tatler’s Catherine the Great article of August 2020? How very clever of Kay/Levy to try to elide Kate’s admissions in that damning Tatler piece, with their confections here that Kate never complains. In Tatler’s C t G, Kate made complaining an artform. She complained that she was overworked and was sssssooooo exhausted; she complained that Harry and Meghan had ‘thrown the Cambridge children under a bus’, by leaving all the royal duties to Wills and herself and thus taking Kate away from her role as a mother; Kate complained too, that she worked as hard as a CEO and needed more holidays [despite having had several holidays that year]. On, and on, the litany of gripes poured out. Never mind that H&M would want to work on their own philanthropic projects, or that Meghan was newly delivered of her own baby son, and was nursing him. Or that Meghan and Harry would themselves want to spend time with their new infant. Of course, Kate claimed mitigating circumstances in her case because, she announced, she was ‘a Kingmaker’! Several months after this Tatler edition was out, Kate was in the press – DM if I recall – again claiming she was sssssoooo exhausted. Too bad Kay/Levy, it’s on record, in print, and in our memories. You’ll have to do better than ‘can’t recall’.

  45. IRMAVEP says:

    At Marlborough boarding school, Kate was notorious for positioning herself at her window, then baring her bottom or ‘mooning’ the school boys passing by. Later – post wedding – Kate had a reputation for allowing her skirt to be caught by a breeze and blowing upwards, exposing bare thighs and, as was the case at Calgary International airport, baring two rounded botty-cheeks too. Some papers banned the more revealing pics, but they are still out there. Either Kate went out without panties that day, or she was wearing the briefest of thongs. We could practically see what she’d had for breakfast! More discreet flashings occurred in an assortment of summery dresses, including a maternity dress. Then there ere the topless bikini photos. Not much more of Kate to see, really.

    • Nic919 says:

      At school she was nicknamed Kate Middlebum and apparently the school did have to speak to her because the flashing happened too often to ignore.

      • IRMAVEP says:

        Nic919 Hilarious name, Kate Middlebum . very jolly holly sticks! Wonder what constituted ‘too often’? On one’s birthday? Once a month? No more than six times a day? How amusing to have to decide what’s ‘too often’! There’s a medical term for this recurrent type of exhibitionism in women – it’s known as Anasyrma – or skirt lifting. It’s considered a psychological need and is though rare in females. Emotional abuse in childhood and family dysfunction are both significant risk factors in the development of exhibitionism [hello Carole, stage mother extraordinaire.] It can be treated with psychotherapy as people with exhibitionism do not know how to form healthy relationships, whether sexual or nonsexual, with other people. About sums Kate up IMO – she has few friends. Anyone have any comments?

  46. aquarius64 says:

    Bullyam didn’t like the Waity Katie reference? Don’t like reminding the world he strung Kate along for 10 years and Harry got down on one knee in under two?

    • notasugarhere says:

      If Meghan hadn’t been under contract to Suits, I think they would have married earlier. Harry told courtiers in Sept/Oct of 2016 that Meghan was The One and they needed to start preparing.

  47. Jay says:

    HA, they are really trying it with “poor Archie and his baby sister having to live so far away from their Windsor cousins”. Nevermind the racism and indifference that drove them away in the first place. The British media is going to have a stroke when Harry’s kids start speaking like the California residents they are.

    Anybody else find it weird to describe Anmer as a “refuge” for William and Kate that they would “happily” live in full time? It’s…their home, isn’t it? I don’t see how George going to school is the thing that prevents them from living where they like, unless Battersea is, in fact, the only elementary school in the U.K.? What am I missing here? Or is it setting up that the Cambridges would prefer to do more of their work from Anmer?

  48. IRMAVEP says:

    Should we want any further evidence of Kate being the calculating aggressor and Meghan being the innocent aggrieved in this recurring story of ‘who made whom cry’, I suggest one compares the photos of Meghan and Kate recently printed on CB. One – the closeup of Kate’s appraising eyes in the black veil and mask at Philip’s funeral. And two, the sweet expression on Meghan’s face in the black and white hat at Ascot [22 April]. Can you envisage Meghan ever matching,, or wanting to match, the potential ruthlessness which is expressed in Kate’s eyes – talk about femme fatale!

  49. TheOriginalMia says:

    Something is definitely rotten in Norfolk. These stories are ridiculous. The rewriting of Kate’s history is laughable. She’s a mean girl. She’s competitive. She’s lazy. The only reason she’s where she is today is because she’s also a willing doormat. She puts up with William because all she & her mother care about is the crown.

    ETA: these stories are so pro-centric Kate that I may have to give credence to the stories that William’s real anger at the Sussexes because they delayed him dumping Kate. Kate & Carole act like a wounded animal fighting to survive.

    • ennie says:

      As NOTSOSIMPLETAYLOR said above, I think William won’t divorce kate the great anytime soon. The Charles/Diana divorce was a mess and he would have to fight for the divorce from such a “perfect” woman, and I think he is comfortable as long as she is compliant to whatever he is up to.
      He seems distant, cold, uptight, not a very nice person all around, but she knew him and went along, and I agree that she wants to go the whole way to the consort crown.

      • Tessa says:

        I don’t think the public has taken to Kate the way they took to Diana. ALl this propping up by the media is a big turn off and Kate had a history of being work shy.

      • JT says:

        I don’t think there is anything compliant about saying that Kate is the lynchpin of the monarchy and that William needs her in order to be king. She’s literally undermining his image as the strong future leader. I could believe he was comfortable in how things are with Kate if we weren’t getting these ridiculous articles every day. SHE certainly doesn’t think he’s comfortable, if she’s trying to remind the public of her usefulness.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        ennie, I actually think the description you have of W also pertains to K. I’ve never thought she was a very hands on mother. If the Nanny takes the kids to see W, they’ll be fine. She portrays a distant, cold and uptight person. And we all know she’s a mean girl. At this point, I’m not sure what she wants. It’s really possible that she’s positioning herself for a large financial settlement. I wonder if it has occurred to her that it will put her in a position of strength (at least initially) if she files for divorce rather than W? I don’t think it’s occurred to the Mids that the brf is not a family to set up as an enemy, because I really believe that’s a losing proposition for them. There are really making a mistake setting themselves up against Chuck. Things could get rather interesting. Let the games begin!!

      • ennie says:

        Tess, I mean that he’d have to fight with the courtiers and the family, not the public… maybe? Just because it would make them so dumb, to prop her up so much, to then divorce her, and because the RF is not going in a good path. Charles and Camilla are stable, but they are not so well liked, and the RF/curtiers are trying to pander to the younger generation via W&K, and still failing , they are stale and not modern, not even in their outfits.
        The only thing they have going is the family “stability” and the promise of their children/future workers.
        True, JT, that katie: I’m here to stay, folks!
        Saucy, I agree with what you say, the only good thing to kate, is that she actually has a family to rely on if there was a divorce, and she seems a half made woman still, Diana did not have that, and she had issues that made her need people to back her.
        God riddance for Harry, really, I think he misses some aspects of his UK family, but he took those decisions and knows is well worthy, he, as the spare, was clearly told his future, and he is better off with his own loving family

    • notasugarhere says:

      TheOriginalMia, they read that way to me too. Kate and Carole are worried, very worried, about their future.

      • TheOriginalMia says:

        They should be worried, Nota. If William divorces Kate before the Queen dies, she gets what he has at that moment, which is whatever remains of his inheritance from Diana. If divorce is inevitable, they may be angling to hold on until he becomes Duke of Cornwall. She’ll never be beloved like Diana, so she’ll need every advantage she can get until George becomes PoW and can help Mummy out financially & status wise.

      • JT says:

        @theorinallima That’s a good point. If he wants to divorce the next few years would a be good time. It’ll be a much better idea financially, as well as limiting her status. It’s better to have a divorced Duchess of Cambridge, rather than a Princess of Wales, especially if he gets remarried.

      • Becks1 says:

        I’ve said before that I think we’ll get a good idea on the state of her marriage when Charles becomes king – at which point William is the duke of cornwall. If he holds back on the PoW title, then I think we know a divorce is coming. Charles doesn’t want a divorced Princess of Wales running around again. But I wouldn’t be surprised at this point if a divorce happens before that.

        I also don’t think William could use duchy funds to pay any part of the divorce settlement, I think I read he had to borrow money from his mother to pay part of the settlement with Diana.

      • notasugarhere says:

        William cannot use any Duchy funds for a divorce settlement, just as Charles couldn’t use it. If William paid a huge amount towards the Middletons new house? That could count as a post-nup and divorce settlement right there.

        Agree on the titles, Becks1. If William wants Kate gone, he’ll work with Charles on it. They’d agree to hold off on the Prince of Wales letters patent until the divorce is final.

  50. FrontPorchSittin says:

    I’m just waiting for the day that the RR and BRF figures out that they’re entirely transparent and that no one is buying what they’re selling. At some point it has to dawn on them that their time controlling the conversation has passed, doesn’t it? Are they really so insulated that no one has pointed out to them that we know that the Emperor has no clothes, so to speak? Or is that they’re too entitled to hear that? I don’t know how exactly it’s going to crumble for them, but it will be the direct result of their handling of this whole situation.

    ADHD Side Note:
    I wonder who would win in a mom-ager off: Carole Middleton or Kris Jenner?

    • Lady D says:

      I maintain that Kris should be a professor, teaching people to advertise themselves. The money she could make for her information, tactics and flat out skill at marketing completely unremarkable people (women) and turning them into multi-millionaires would make her richer than God. Even the women on the fringes of this family see success or monetary success from being around them. Poor Rob.
      Carole? Carole is such a rookie, its laughable, as noted by our daily amusement of her classless machinations.

      • NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

        At this moment, it is becoming blatantly obvious the leaks are coming from Carole. The Daily Mail and The Sun aren’t even trying to hide that it’s Carole.

  51. Merricat says:

    I would give up Waity Katie for Second-Rate Kate.

  52. paddingtonjr says:

    This piece by Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy is just all kinds of wrong. I know the British are known for their gift of understatement, but to catergorize the hell Meghan went through as “sullen disappointment” is an insult to her and a slap in the face to anyone who has been unjustly harassed. Meghan hit the ground running; in her less than two years as a working Royal, she did more than Kate has done in her nearly four decades on this Earth. And, Meghan did it while she was being attacked and while pregnant. As she ends her 30s, what does Kate have? Big Blue, an incadescent rageaholic of a husband, three cute kids and many pictures of her flashing her backside in public. Yet she’s praised for exisiting.

    William and Kate are seriously two of the most useless people on the planet. They can’t even manage to do the minimum expected of them yet demand respect and reverence because he’s Diana’s son and they are the FFK & FFQC. They fully expected to bask in H&M’s reflected glory but didn’t want the Sussexes to outshine them by actually showing up and getting things done. Now, they’re trotting out the old “poor us, we’re working SO hard because Harry’s petulant and Meghan’s sullen.” Yet their numbers don’t reflect this new workload and they just appear out of touch with the people they are supposed to represent.

    I think there is a referendum on the BRF coming soon and it won’t be pretty. There was a time and place for a Royal Family I suppose, but the 21st century ain’t it.

    • L4frimaire says:

      @Paddingtonjr, 100% agree. It’s truly disgusting how they refuse to acknowledge the racism and hostility Meghan had to deal with on a daily basis. They don’t see it because in their eyes, it’s something she needed to take to atone for the sin of marrying Prince Harry while black. To them, her not accepting this damaging treatment is her not “ knowing her place” or being sullen. These royal reporters can seriously f* ck all the way off. As for the Cambridge marriage, I don’t care. All these people thinking William’s affair is some comeuppance for Kate is a bit far fetched. As we see with the racism, the problem isn’t the affair, but the fact it leaked out. I don’t know anything about this Rose woman apart from the fact she’s really rich, has an amazing house and she and her husband seem to have an understanding. Is she Kate’s rival or even still in the picture? Don’t know, don’t care. This is more trying to position Kate as the victim and she’s not. She decided, deliberately, with her jealous husband, to cause willful harm to her brother-in-law and his wife, and benefit from the damaging lie of Meghan making her cry, because of their own racism and insecurity. I’m glad Meghan called her waity ass out internationally. They’re lazy and uninspiring, find it easier to attack and smear others, are awful people, and they deserve each other.

      • Cessily says:

        Meghan was never a know your place kind of woman, it was not how she was raised or who she educated herself to be. She is a “I make my own place” lady and they are inspiring.

  53. Soupie says:

    What a bunch of drivel. When it’s not clueless, it’s pandering.

  54. NotSoSocialButterfly says:

    “Canada liked William, but they fell for Kate’s biscuit.” FIFY

  55. Tessa says:

    The fashion mishaps were embarrassing. It’s amazing how this is rewritten. She took forever to put weights on her skirt hems.

    • FicklePickle says:

      Yeah, it basically didn’t stop until Meghan showed up and Kate finally had some serious competition. I bet somebody used Kate’s reaction to Meghan as an opportunity to sit Kate down and say ‘do you want to beat her in public opinion? The you can’t afford to flash the public anymore’, just to get her to stop embarrassing the Royal Family and the UK.

  56. Dl says:

    The new PR crisis people are supposed to start next month. All articles are about Cannot embiggening. Could Carole be terrified the new team may help Willnot get rid of Cannot?

  57. Lizzie says:

    Harry and Meghan were supposed to do the grunt work so Bill and Cathy could show up for the glory. They have been crying over this for more than a year now. Please continue, it’s such a good look to moan how hard your life is. If self pity were a sport the Cambridge’s would win gold.

  58. Tessa says:

    Kate is so not competitive. She was in that dragon boat race, standing up as the captain so she would be noticed. The Second William beckoned, she quit the boat race.

  59. aquarius64 says:

    I frankly don’t see the big deal about William’s affair. Charles is not losing the throne because of his shenanigans with Camilla. Bono is not going to be voted out of office because his sidepiece turned baby mama turned fiancee is living at No. 10. I think the Middletons are fearing William is ready to ditch Kate and using the run-up to the 10th anniversary for the heavy campaigning is telling.

    • Alexandria says:

      I have already said this before. High level PR firms would have no trouble spinning affairs so I don’t think an affair is a big PR crisis in the long run. Especially with Uncle Gary and Carole hanging around, it’s so easy to make them scapegoats. And for KkkAte, TOB can always blame HM leaving on her. She has a lot of history with the twisted press. Imagine if they keep printing Lazy Katie Waitie and her unweighted hem incidents every day.

    • notasugarhere says:

      I don’t think the affair is a big deal either, seeing as Kate and Carole agreed to the cheating as part of the bargain. But William won’t want a divorce to be seen as related to his cheating. He did everything he could to force papers to bury that story.

      When/if he divorces Kate, it will be couched as Uni friends who shouldn’t have married, drifted apart, no other parties involved. If the Midds don’t play that way? He and the royals go full-on against the Midds, their off-shore money, Uncle Gary, William claiming he was emotionally and sexually manipulated by the Midds.

      • HeatherC says:

        with all the embiggening of Kate going on, the only way he can seem a strong leader ready to be king in the court of public opinion, really, is to ditch Kate. CarolE is such a rookie, she should call Kris Jenner ASAP to fix some of the over the top articles that set her daughter up for a ridiculously high fall.

      • NotSoSimpleTaylor says:

        I don’t think the affair is the issue as much as ensuring Kate gets her QC hat. I also think William is pretty mean to her and I do sometimes think this might be the media (along with Carole)’s way to boost Kate with the knowledge that all is not well in their marriage in that family.

        I don’t think they will divorce but I also think that their romantic marriage is over. For Kate, whose entire life was built on marrying William, that has to be a tough pill to swallow and a stressful lie to maintain for the rest of her life.

      • Gabby says:

        Hmmm. Maybe what shakes Carole is the looming future of the monarchy brainstorming session between Will and Chuck. They may work up one plan that includes Kate doing royal work (!) and an alternate one that does not. It puts a plan in place should Will decide to pull the trigger on a divorce.

    • Tessa says:

      I understand that Kate told Chelsy (when she was dating Harry) that they needed to put up with cheating or words to that effect. I guess that’s what Mama told Kate.

      • Wiglet Watcher says:

        I’m not sure the true origins of that line, but it’s documented in the timelines Kate got with William while he had a girlfriend. Everyone knew and she did the catwalk. Before Kate and chelsy knew each other Kate knew William was a serial cheater. It probably just didn’t matter as much because she benefited.

      • notasugarhere says:

        He stayed with that girlfriend for months after, too, using Kate for sex on the side because the girlfriend was religious and wanted to wait for marriage.

    • Becks1 says:

      The affair isn’t a big deal in that the affair in itself isn’t going to prevent William from being king. Charles cheated on Diana as everyone knows and that’s not stopping him from becoming king in a few years.

      I think right now William has worked himself into a corner though – threatening lawsuits and throwing your biracial SIL to the wolves to prevent news organizations from covering that affair IS a big deal. Throwing your royal weight around to control the press seems a step too far in this day and age. I think he was so desperate to prevent the story from coming out that he looks so much worse. Like the coverup is worse than the crime, you know?

      I do think the affair would be bad for his image because literally the only thing he and Kate have going for them is this image of a happy normal family, which many, many people still buy into. An affair “could” kill that image and that would be bad for William, but not “you don’t get to be king now” bad. So its kind of a sign of how inept he is (but thinks he’s the king of PR) that he bungled this whole thing so badly.

      • notasugarhere says:

        I’ve written before, he’ll have no problem playing the ‘manipulated by the Middletons’ line as part of it. He was alone, still reeling from his mother’s death, he was easy pickings. He could use all of the pro-Kate, anti-Meghan stories from Camp Carole as evidence of how Kate worked to break the marriage and the royal family.

      • Nic919 says:

        What if it’s more than an affair? It’s very odd that the courts would provide a super injunction for an affair when in the past they haven’t. The kind of silence they are providing seems to suggest something more, perhaps a child is in the mix. Not Rose because we would know, but someone else.

      • kelleybelle says:

        Kind of? He blew it, big-time. And continues to blow it. They’re a pair of incompetents with zero charisma, nothing more.

    • kelleybelle says:

      No, maybe not, but Charles will not be a popular king because of his shenanigans with Camilla and his ill treatment of Diana. He is still a spineless coward.

  60. jferber says:

    The Cambridge marriage reminds me of Carmelo Anthony’s (the American basketball star) when he said, “La La [his wife] is married, but I’m not.” I think William is following in his father’s and grandfather’s footsteps with the philandering. I also believe that William is snarky to and disdainful of his wife.

    • Wiglet Watcher says:

      Reportedly both Charles and William have said the POW is expected to have mistresses. William said so in an argument with Kate that came out in a pro Kate piece during the dating years to rally up sympathy. The entitlement with heirs is thick.

  61. Likeyoucare says:

    These two sure like to complain that they are overworked, aren’t there.
    But no one can point out what are they working at?

  62. BayTampaBay says:

    “And he was enraged that Meghan should drag up that cruel old chestnut ‘Waity Katie’.’”

    I do not remember Meghan saying anything about ” Waity Katie”>

    • Nyro says:

      She said it in a bonus clip. And she said it with the hard “t” like a Brit too, that was so funny to me. “WaiTy KaTie”. She didn’t want anyone in America to be confused. Not “waDey” but “WaiTy” as in waiting around for a marriage proposal. I loved it.

    • Becks1 says:

      @Bay – it was a bonus clip like Nyro said and it was actually a very good clip, she talks about how sure, that was a mean thing to call Kate and she can’t imagine how she must have felt, but it was rude, and racist is not the same thing as rude.

  63. Steph says:

    Am I the only with this take away: as long as the Sussex stay away from full time working royal status, William will have nothing to do with them and their children cannot be friends?