Kim Kardashian claims she never purchased the stolen antiquity in the first place

kim 10203

We learned this week that Kim Kardashian was somewhat associated with a smuggled antiquity which is now being held by Customs. The antiquity is Fragment of Myron Samian Athena, a large fragment of a first-century sculpture which was likely smuggled out of Italy decades ago. The provenance of the piece is wack – it was in the hands of either an English or a German private collector, then sold to an art dealer, then bought by Belgian interior designer Axel Vervoordt, who designed Kim Kardashian and Kanye West’s LA home. From the Vervoordt gallery, the statue fragment and other art pieces and furniture were shipped to Kim in LA. At some point when the package made it onto American soil, Customs held on to it because the paperwork was all wrong, and now it looks like Kim will have to “forfeit” the antiquity and it will be returned to Italy. The thing is, Kim’s representative made a statement and denied that Kim even purchased it in the first place.

Kim Kardashian did not purchase an ancient Roman sculpture that federal authorities are trying to seize after it was imported to the U.S. five years ago, a representative for the reality TV star said Wednesday. Italian officials think the sculpture, described as “Fragment of Myron’s Samian Athena, Limestone, Roman, 1st – 2nd century A.D.,” was originally looted from Italy, and they want it returned, according to a civil complaint for forfeiture filed in federal court in Los Angeles last week.

The case dates to 2016, when the antique statue arrived at the Port of Los Angeles and immediately caught the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials. The broker provided a form to the CBP that listed the consignee, or buyer, and importer as “Kim Kardashian dba Noel Roberts Trust.” The shipment, described as containing antiques, furniture and decorations, had 40 pieces in all valued at $745,882, the filing says.

Speaking on Kardashian’s behalf, a representative told NBC News that “this is the first that she has learned of its existence. We believe it may have been purchased using her name without authorization and because it was never received, she was unaware of the transaction. We encourage an investigation and hope that it gets returned to the rightful owners,” the representative said.

[From NBC News]

That’s really interesting that Kim’s people are flatly denying, on the record, that she even purchased the statue and had no knowledge of it being shipped to her. It makes me believe even more that this was entirely a f–k up with Alex Vervoordt and his gallery and his people. Maybe the gallery didn’t intend to purchase looted/stolen antiquities, but they knew better than to purchase a piece with such a shady provenance, and they absolutely knew better than to basically forge documents to smuggle the piece out of the country. Damn.

61st Annual Grammy Awards

kim vacay46

Photos courtesy of Kim’s IG, cover courtesy of AD.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

29 Responses to “Kim Kardashian claims she never purchased the stolen antiquity in the first place”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Riley says:

    This is all very interesting but WHAT IN GOD’S GREEN EARTH IS ON HER FEET?!?

  2. Renee says:

    She looks ridiculous….that’s all I’ve got.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      She always looks ridiculous, just like her concrete and cold house, yuk! Of course she bought it!! He was her designer!

    • Swack says:

      Daily Mail has a picture of her working out in a mono-kini if you really want to see something ridiculous.

    • Mustang Sally says:

      I saw the mono-kini work out pic (I can’t unsee it now). She looks ridiculous in the first photo with those over-exaggerated duck lips and peace sign fingers. Enough already.

  3. Liz version 700 says:

    Did Kanye give her those …she’s like things in her feet?

  4. Hell Nah! says:

    Brand management.

    Whether she did or did not purchase the sculpture, she doesn’t want to be seen as a theef. Oh, the irony.

  5. Brittany says:

    I don’t really buy this. How would Kim not notice a half-million dollar expenditure? I know she’s extremely, extremely rich but still. That’s a huge chunk of change. Kim is very on top of her finances. Would the gallery send it to her on spec? How does this happen?

  6. Wickster says:

    Okay, I’m old so…can someone please explain the fish face and the “peace sign” (that tells you how old I am, ha ha). One of my nieces was doing this a pose a few months ago and it looked ridiculous on her– but then she’s 11. It looks even more ridiculous on a grown woman.

    • Mabs A'Mabbin says:

      I’m old as well, but they’ve been doing that since Britney, Lindsey and Paris were riding around LA at 3am with no panties lol.

      Actually, let’s take the peace sign back to the 60s lol.

      Those shoes are a nightmare.

      • Wickster says:

        Thank you. I pride myself on being the “cool aunt” –but I’m unreasonably bothered by the “fish face”!

  7. The Other Sarah says:

    I have learned that very rich people who hire decorators often have the decorator stage the home with options for the owner to choose from. It wouldn’t surprise me if this was imported for Kim but she had no idea. She’d probably be shown the staged home, give a yes/no on pieces, and then receive the bill + 30% commission from the decorator.

  8. Louise177 says:

    I believe that Kim didn’t know about the piece and that it was stolen. I think she was decorating her house and gave the designer a budget. Probably didn’t even know what was purchased until it arrived at the house. So I believe her about not knowing about it since it was in customs for five years.

    • The Recluse says:

      That sounds pretty accurate actually.
      I can’t imagine being that rich.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I disagree. I can see them working with a designer, but importing requires paperwork and taxes. And payment that large would ABSOLUTELY have to be approved by the buyer before it was purchased. No way in the world the designer would have put themselves on the hook for a purchase that big.

  9. Sansa says:

    i believe her, honestly. but mostly i’m commenting because of those MONSTROSITIES masquerading as footwear. raise your hand if you’re not a sneaker head or fashionista but knew those were so ugly they could only be yeezy sandals

  10. Mina_Esq says:

    I believe it. Antiquities are not her style.

  11. Ogekimkanye says:

    Kim is so beautiful 🥰

  12. SHOREH says:

    All of the board games on the table in that picture are still wrapped up.