Prince Charles: ‘I am proud that my sons have recognized the threat’ of climate change

79087PCN_WaxBetty02

Prince Charles covers the latest issue of Newsweek, “The Climate Change Issue.” Say what you will about Charles – he’s weak, he’s a terrible father, he has horrible instincts – but he has genuinely been ahead of the curve on many environmental issues, and I would consider him a self-styled environmental advocate and activist. Does he also fly on private jets too much? Yes. For Newsweek, Charles wrote an essay about the need to come together and make big, bold changes in our lifestyles and our industries to combat climate change. He – like his wrathful son – invokes John F. Kennedy, because the Windsors have a real thing about the Kennedys. Charles also mentions his pride in BOTH of his sons for their environmental work:

Sixty years ago, my late father identified the damage humankind was inflicting on the planet and helped to found the World Wildlife Fund. A decade later, when I first spoke publicly about the environment, many wondered if my sense of urgency was misplaced. That view has shifted in the intervening decades, though all too slowly, and, even today, lacks the urgency needed.

As a father, I am proud that my sons have recognised this threat. Most recently, my elder son, William, launched the prestigious Earthshot Prize to incentivise change and help repair our planet over the next ten years by identifying and investing in the technologies that can make a difference. And my younger son, Harry, has passionately highlighted the impact of climate change, especially in relation to Africa, and committed his charity to being net zero.

Globally, dwindling numbers deny humankind’s role in climate change, but too many still pessimistically assert our lack of power to stop, and maybe reverse, the damage to our planet; that we are “gripped by forces beyond our control.”

Science tells us these forces are very much within our control. But only if we consciously choose to act. Whether, as in JFK’s time, it is putting a man on the moon, or more recently developing a vaccine for COVID-19, humankind has proved capable of solving the seemingly insolvable. I believe we can, and must, do so again if we wish to protect and preserve this planet that we call home.

As 2021 ends, there is every reason to believe we have reached a watershed moment. The agreements reached at C.O.P. 26 in November marked useful and important progress. Once again there was international recognition of the climate crisis. Leaders demonstrated political courage and a willingness to be held responsible and accountable for their actions. The focus appeared, as it should, on the impact of inaction for our children, grandchildren and generations beyond.

[From Newsweek]

That’s just a partial excerpt of the essay. In the full piece, Charles does make some some bigger, concrete suggestions for what needs to be changed and what kind of goals should be met on a set schedule. Unlike William, Charles doesn’t just barge into a conversation, announce his keenness and expect things to change. Charles is actually trying to wrangle wider support for bolder action. Plus, this essay serves to remind everyone that William and Harry are following in HIS footsteps. I would pay $20 to the environmental charity of Charles’s choice to hear what Charles really thinks about Willy’s little Keenshot mess.

Remembrance Sunday

Prince Charles, HRH Prince William and HRH Prince Harry with Sir

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “Prince Charles: ‘I am proud that my sons have recognized the threat’ of climate change”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. LesRob says:

    I am simply going to record this day that the Prince of Wales mentioned in writing that he HAS a younger son and that that younger son has an influential charity of his own.

  2. Becks1 says:

    I feel like the cover headline is snarky, right? Yes, Charles, your children are judging you.

    Anyway, hypocrisy aside in terms of jets etc, I do like that charles often puts out there concrete things for people to do. he gave an interview on BBC (I think) this past fall where he mentioned not eating meat at least once a week and a few other things like that – things that are attainable for many people, and the kinds of things where if enough people do it, it can make a difference. But he does also talk about what’s needed big-picture wise.

  3. Kalana says:

    If it came down to saving the planet or flying commercial, I wonder which option Charles would pick? And how much do you want to bet that the royals invest in environmentally unsound companies?

    I hope next year we actually hear about how Earthshot helped anyone besides just giving the winners large cash prizes. Did any environmental progress actually happen? And I hope we also hear about the environmental footprint of moving the awards to the US.

    • equality says:

      You need to land that question on all those wanting to get an update on Meghan’s 40×40. Where’s the update on Earthshot?

  4. Laura-Lee MacDonald says:

    I would pay $200, or more, to hear what Charles really thinks about Earthshot. My understanding is that he’s happy to take the money anyway. Maybe I’ll get dual citizenship, too!

  5. ShazBot says:

    I guess they had to not mention Travelyst and keep Harry’s stuff vague so as not to make William look bad.

    • RoyalBlue says:

      no mention of Travelyst or Archewell. intentional. and also intentional to add prestigious before Earthshit.

  6. MsIam says:

    I’m sure Newsweek forced his hand in some way to throw in a mention of Harry, otherwise it would raise more questions. Father of the year Charles.

  7. Jan says:

    Trying to get in the American market for money, Charles you’re fooling no one, was it just two years ago that you said, Harry would get security for a year, then they would be a review at the end of the year, two months later you cut off his security abruptly and announced his address to the press.
    The BM can try to cover up about Andy as much as they want, but it’s not a secret in the rest of the World.
    Twitter is doing the royal family dirty work by suppressing #s but the story is still getting out, no one loves more publicity than Lisa Bloom, except her mother Gloria Allred.

  8. Valar Dohaeris says:

    This was posted on the Clarence House IG account and there were some seriously unhinged commenters mad as hell that Charles acknowledged Harry’s existence. It’s so strange…these red-faced racists would want Charles to hate Harry because THEY do. It just goes to show how deep the years-long smear campaign by the BM against H&M has run. To the point that these people would prefer that H&M disappeared altogether.

  9. STRIPE says:

    In another timeline, he and Diana could really have been a power couple in terms of charity and global issues.

    If he hadn’t been so jealous of her shine, he could have figured out how to leverage her star power to help the world, the monarchy, and himself. What a pity he couldn’t see past his own nose. And what a pity the institution made the same mistake again with Meghan.

  10. Lory says:

    He’s also realizing his son gets more good press than he does so he wants to watch his name to it. Like it’s because of HIS influence that Harry wants to protect the environment.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    I can’t stand this person but Gert’s Royals on twitter made a good point about this essay. He mentioned that he visited the River Jordan which is being depleted by Climate Change but took 2 dozen bottles of water from the river for his family’s christenings. Charles is not a true environmentalist, he’s a green washer. And the only reason he mentioned Harry was because he was writing for an American publication so of course he had to acknowledge Harry, who is very popular in the US.

    • MA says:

      +1 Charles is an environmentalist when it’s convenient for him. He’ll lecture everyone, pat himself on the back for recognizing climate change and conduct quirky idle rich people experiments like using vegetable oil to run his cars but then charter a flight to retrieve his shoehorn and not reduce the royal family’s carbon footprint or make the royal residences eco friendly. “The Queen” lobbied to have her property exempt from eco laws while Charles is regent and He won’t do anything to reverse that when it’s his time officially.

  12. Sunday says:

    Wow, I didn’t realize that Prince Phillip founded the World Wildlife Fund. Suddenly all the stories about WWF’s white supremacist tactics and continued violence against native populations makes a lot more sense.

    • equality says:

      He was one of the founders. Just another example of RF hogging of credit.

    • Amy Bee says:

      WWF was founded by rich white people for the purpose of hunting in Asia and Africa under the guise of conservation.