Will Novak Djokovic sue the Australian Open for millions because of ‘ill treatment’?

Novak Djokovic was deported from Australia on Sunday, just about twelve hours before the Australian Open main draw began. Novak issued a statement as he left, saying (in part) that he would have more to say once the tournament was over in two weeks and he didn’t want to distract from the tennis. For the most part, people have been paying attention to the tennis and there are already some great and tragic stories coming out of the Slam. But the ghost of Djoker is still haunting the tournament.

At the end of the day, Australian authorities – like Immigration Minister Alex Hawke – decided not to nitpick Djokovic’s visa application, or call into question the sketchy and dangerous timeline Djokovic provided, which had him admitting that he knew he was Covid-positive when he did a photoshoot and in-person interview. Hawke ended up canceling Novak’s visa because Novak has a well-documented history of being anti-vaccine. On Thursday, the Australian federal court released the actual ruling on Novak’s appeal. Three judges unanimously agreed with Hawke, pointing out that Novak’s stardom and influence means that his anti-vaccine ideology was a danger to himself and others.

While Djoker was the architect of his own demise, he had significant help in the form of Tennis Australia’s CEO Craig Tiley, who clearly bent the rules to ensure that Djokovic could receive a medical exemption. Tiley was interviewed at the AO today, and he made a number of very strange statements. For one, he said that he’s absolutely not planning on resigning, which… he should. He also denied the report that Tennis Australia was picking up the $500K-plus tab for Djokovic’s legal fees in Australia, but didn’t specify if TA did have some kind of arrangement to partially pay for Novak’s legal fees. Tiley also didn’t want to talk about the lack of daily Covid testing for players – players on the ground have complained that the Covid protocols are way too loose this year, especially given the huge spike in Omicron.

A tragic ass-covering by a bureaucrat, basically. Regarding Novak and money, the Sun reported yesterday that Novak is “in talks” with lawyers about possibly suing the Australian government for ill treatment. A lot of figures are being thrown around, but if he sues, it would be for something in the vicinity of $3-5 million? It would be interesting to see if he does that – I suspect he will not, because I suspect he will want to work out some kind of deal to ensure that he plays in Australia next year. But we will see. I wonder if Novak is sitting in Belgrade, seething, or if he’s mostly just sad to miss his favorite slam.

Weirdly, this story also popped up yesterday – Djokovic has an 80% stake in a Danish biotech firm which is developing a “treatment for Covid-19.” As in, not a vaccine, but… like, a pill or something? All of this just because Djokovic is too g–damn stubborn to get the vaccine.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, social media.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

20 Responses to “Will Novak Djokovic sue the Australian Open for millions because of ‘ill treatment’?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MsIam says:

    We shouldn’t take the vaccine but pills are ok? It’s all put into the body but somehow pills are fine and can’t do damage? Make it make sense!

    • goofpuff says:

      It doesn’t make sense unless you realize its all about $$$$ to them. They don’t profit from the vaccines but they can profit off these pills.

  2. Merricat says:

    Will the rest of the world sue Djokovic for crimes against humanity? I am only partly joking.

  3. Meg says:

    He doesn’t deserve one penny of compensation or reimbursement. He did this to himself. Being an entitled a-hole has a cost.

  4. fluffybunny says:

    You know what he could do to ensure he plays next year? Get fucking vaccinated. This isn’t going anywhere nor are vaccine requirements.

  5. Lauren Too says:

    I met this lady on a in person class who is an antivaxxer. These people are pigheaded and cannot be convinced that the vaccine isn’t dangerous at all. So yeah, I’m not surprised that he would rather develop a treatment for covid and not take anything as a preventative measure.

  6. Sof says:

    Last night the story was that Tennis Australia had even filled his visa applications, so everything is weird.
    I still maintain my theory that behind the scenes he was granted participation on the tournament, which is why he could sue them, damaging to his reputation and all.
    Interesting that he finances a potential treatment as all the anti-covid a-holes have him as king now, to me his thoughts on covid are still unclear.
    The reticence adults still have to get vaccinated is puzzling to me. We need you all to get vaccinated to move on!

  7. Desdemona says:

    Well, well, well, according to the Spanish newspapers he bought 80% of the shares of a pharmaceutical in Denmark to develop treatments against Covid? Oh my, oh my…. That’s so interesting… So, I’m guessing taking vaccines is a no, pill is a yes, especially if I’m making money from them… That’s his reasoning…
    Idiot…

  8. Kristen says:

    At this point I think he’ll get vaccinated. There’s too much upcoming tennis that he’ll miss out on otherwise, and the only reason he cares about all this “health” hooey in the first place is so that he can be the most amazing and beloved tennis player to ever live.

  9. Rhea says:

    Just wanted to throw this out there – I was recently tested positive, and my mom got Covid TWICE after getting vaccinated. If even two vaccine doses and natural immunity can’t contain this variant…

    Considering how many countries are now offering vaccine exemption or just not making it mandatory anymore, I can’t help but believe that Australia indeed did Djoker dirty. It eventually became a political circus, IMO.

    • minime says:

      Yes, definitely Australia did him dirt by not allowing a rich white dude to not follow the rules and law in place like everyone else has to…(insert eye rolling x1000). Plus you and your mom got it but apparently both of you are fortunately just fine and not in intensive care so maybe that’s thanks to being vaccinated. Just throwing that out there.

      • Lkv says:

        They did issue him a visa, didn’t they? He came to Australia with a visa which an Australian minister then revoked. If they didn’t issue him a visa in the first place he wouldn’t be able to come to Australia and there wouldn’t be this whole mess. They did him wrong.

      • Emma33 says:

        Plenty of people get issued visas and then get denied entry at the border because they don’t have documents or other information that allows them entry. For example, one of the 9/11 bombers was denied entry to the USA even though he had a visa. (From memory, I think he was too vague about his plans for being the US and the border guard was suspicious.) It happens all the time!

      • Tiffany:) says:

        They revoked his visa because he LIED about not traveling within the last 14 days before he went to Australia. There were photos of him in Spain. He did himself dirty.

    • Robert says:

      Australia didn’t do him dirty. The Australian Open did. Australia was just following their own rules. The open was just worried about money.

  10. Ange says:

    As an Australian I’m not surprised they aren’t doing daily covid testing, nobody in the damn country can get their hands on a RAT even for positive cases. Could you imagine the uproar if a bunch of privileged tennis players got them over the people? There was no way they could win there. It’s a huge failure of the government to secure a supply.