Spotify has job listings to cover ‘every step’ of producing the Sussexes’ podcasts?

The British media thinks they have some kind of opening to nitpick the Duke and Duchess of Sussex: Harry and Meghan have not produced any podcasts in more than a year, and they’ve only produced one podcast thus far. British “sources” keep insisting – in very tortured ways – that Spotify is furious with Harry and Meghan, that Spotify will withhold payment, that Spotify is having second thoughts about the Sussexes’ contract because (get this) Harry and Meghan are so unpopular. The only story I’ve believed in recent months is that Spotify gave Harry and Meghan a “gentle nudge” to get on track to produce some podcasts. Now the Daily Mail claims that Spotify is appointing their own people to oversee production of the Sussexes’ podcasts.

They launched their £18million podcast deal a year ago with a pledge to promote ‘shared values’. But Harry and Meghan’s pet project appears to have suffered a blow, with audio giant Spotify reportedly taking production into its own hands. After the deal resulted in only one show being streamed, it is advertising for in-house staff to cover ‘every step’ of the process.

Spotify announced the partnership with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s Archewell Audio in December 2020 as they were ‘citizens of the world’ who wanted to ‘elevate underrepresented voices’. But aside from a 33-minute ‘holiday special’ that month featuring friends such as Sir Elton John and James Corden – and the intensely private couple’s son, Archie, speaking his first public words – there has been a deafening silence.

The latest move follows Harry and Meghan adding two more ‘entertainment’ companies to their growing business empire in Delaware. The pair, who stepped back from royal duty last year, are setting up a complex network of companies all based in the opaque tax haven state.

Spotify had said it expected the first ‘complete series’ from Archewell Audio in 2021, but has since given no further updates. In July, Archewell hired an experienced podcast producer, Rebecca Sananes, and confirmed it was ‘looking forward to sharing more content later in 2021’.

Now Spotify is hiring producers through its podcast arm, Gimlet, to work with Archewell Audio. The jobs are being offered to applicants on six-month contracts based in Los Angeles. One advert for a senior producer role reads: ‘We’re currently assembling a show team that will build and launch a new original show with Archewell featuring the voices of high-profile women. The ideal candidate has experience working with high-profile talent, and an interest in the intersection of social activism and popular culture.’

[From The Daily Mail]

The Mail is making this sound like a bad thing for Harry and Meghan, but it sounds more like… Archewell Audio and Spotify are on the same page, and they’re working in concert. It sounds like Spotify’s new mission is to help Archewell Audio produce podcasts. It also sounds like someone at the Daily Mail has been assigned the task of “reading all of the job openings listed for Spotify and trying to make a story out of it.” That’s how little access the British media has to the Sussexes now – they have to resort to examining Spotify’s job listings and Delaware’s latest incorporated business filings. LOL.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

100 Responses to “Spotify has job listings to cover ‘every step’ of producing the Sussexes’ podcasts?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Justplainme says:

    LOL do they think Delaware is an off shore tax shelter? You know, like the queen uses?

    • Izzy says:

      Honestly, yes, they do.

    • Lorelei says:

      If they’d done about TWO MINUTES of research, they would see that like 99% of large American companies are headquartered in Delaware—in name only—for this exact reason. It is totally aboveboard and not unethical in any way.

      Unreal that they spend their time trying to make this into a scandal when the Queen has numerous illegal offshore accounts. Harry and Meghan will have the last laugh.

      • Squirrlee says:

        Well, Delaware is the headquarters of like 99% of US corporations because it is actually a tax haven and the fact that various corporations don’t have to reveal who are the directors/owners of them…. which actually does make it kind of sketchy. (see all of Trump’s various orgs there through which he funnels tax evasions https://www.nbcnews.com/business/taxes/what-trump-s-disclosure-his-500-llcs-can-can-t-n874391)
        Just saying.

      • Becks1 says:

        I mean, like you said its the HQ of something like 99% of US corporations….so I’m not sure what the Trumps have to do with it.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Post got booted again. An article from 2015 – Delaware Online titled -Majority of Delaware corporations are based overseas. Excerpts:

        International companies account for 82 percent of non-Delaware businesses incorporated within the state.

        International companies are defined as any business that has its headquarters based in another country, but opted to form under Delaware law.

        The United Kingdom leads all nations with 1,222 incorporations in Delaware, according to the state. China and Taiwan are second and third with 682 and 415 incorporations, respectively.

        *****************************

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        @Squirrlee, Just saying.

        Barclays Bank Delaware is a subsidiary of Barclays Plc-London. Does the BM/BRF really want people to dig into their Delaware registered corps/companies? It can happen.

    • MoxyLady says:

      Her earrings in the thumb nail!!!! Must. Have. Now.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        The bar like ones with dangles? Love them. Couldn’t find a copy or ones similar in my jewelry budget range.

  2. Case says:

    I was disappointed that they soft-launched the podcast and then went quiet. But if they weren’t prepared or experienced delays for any reason, it’s for the best that they just waited instead of starting full episodes and then needing to take a hiatus, because momentum is important for podcasts. I’m sure they have a plan and I’m sure Spotify is working with them, not mad at them. I hope it comes out soon! I think it’ll be a delightful show and Meghan has the perfect podcast host voice.

  3. Tiffany says:

    They are literally trying to rag on the Sussexes for properly doing to job they are going to be paid for.

    They need to take this energy to that couple that actually is on Saltine Island.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      Yes, @ Tiffany!! A podcast is not able to get running within 3-6 months, that would be disastrous! We are still living during a pandemic as well, as i have heard that those that commit to one topic, the amount of work that is put into conducting one show takes an immense set of staff and unlimited resources. Who knows, but the Daily Fail certainly knows nothing. I think the slow and steady approach is best.

      Let’s face it, Harry and Meghan would never don’t come out of the gate with their first podcast showing a pie chart, like someone else would do due to their stupidity and laziness.

    • Mac says:

      It sounds like all of the backend work is complete and they are ready to begin recording. Hence the need to hire production staff.

  4. Bettyrose says:

    IDK. It doesn’t seem great that they haven’t produced more podcasts but obviously I don’t know what’s been arranged with Spotify behind the scenes.

    • Colby says:

      It’s odd to me as well. They did 1 episode, which means at some point there was momentum behind the effort – then just nothing since. Doesn’t make much sense to me – obviously I don’t know the ins and outs of their agreement, but I doubt it was “1 episode every 2 years”

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Colby: It was a Christmas special, not Episode 1. It was a teaser for their podcast. Michelle Obama released 6 episodes about 18 mouths after it was announced that she was having one and she hasn’t had another episode since.

      • Colby says:

        @Amy Bee – I get what you’re saying…but they signed in 2020 – did 1 “special” (honestly, I think its just semantics. A “special” of a podcast is still an episode, its just a “special” episode…) a matter of weeks after announcing it…then nothing else and we’re at over 2 years after at this point. I can only give my opinion an as avid consumer of podcasts, but I dont think thats great strategy for them OR Obama…so just because Michelle did it doesnt make it right.

        That being said, I am certain they are in no breech of contract or anything crazy like that. Im just saying from a listeners perspective it seems odd.

    • MissMarirose says:

      Yeah, it’s not a good look. And it’s a shame this time has been wasted because so many people had time for podcasts during lockdown. It would’ve been an amazing time to jump start one.

    • swirlmamad says:

      It would seem worse to me if they hadn’t done anything else in the year + since this deal was announced, not to mention they are constantly dealing with an insane press looking to destroy and rip apart anything they do, but they’ve accomplished quite a bit in other areas so I think they are doing just fine. The podcast will come when it comes.

      • bettyrose says:

        I agree. I’ve very sympathetic to them because of the constant scrutiny and absurd criticism, but I have wondered about the podcast. I also agree with the point that the lockdown months were idea for both producing and listening to podcasts.

      • Colby says:

        I actually disagree here. I think it set up a false start to have the one episode, then nothing for over 2 years. Now we’re sitting here wondering why they did one random episode and then totally lost momentum.

      • ShazBot says:

        I know this is yesterday so the comment section is probably over, but Colby, you keep saying over 2 years and their holiday episode was released in December 2020, so it’s been literally 13 months. Just over a year. Not “over 2 years”. Check a calendar.

    • Cate says:

      Yeah, it wouldn’t surprise me to discover that things aren’t going at exactly the pace Spotify originally envisioned, BUT the Sussexes seem to generally be so committed and professional that I have a hard time believing Spotify is hiring a team to micromanage them or to deal with Sussex incompetence, which is how the article is spinning this. I have been on many projects where things don’t go according to the original timeline and while sometimes it’s because a major player is being lazy…often it’s also things like the scope of the project gets changed, people who are key to the project move onto something else (retirement, kids, another better job), something outside everyone’s control (major weather event, pandemic, etc) comes along and effs things up, stuff like that. My guess is that the Sussexes are doing work, but for whatever reason the podcast isn’t ready to launch yet (maybe they started with an initial idea and then realized it would need much more research or more episodes than originally envisioned, for example). I’m not going to believe the relationship is in the trash until Spotify or the Sussexes say so.

    • Jennifer says:

      Yeah, I concur it’s legitimately weird that they only did one back in 2020. I’m pro-Sussex, but that isn’t a great look.
      That said, I wasn’t um….that into the one they did, I can’t even remember much about it any more, so I can’t say I missed more of it, either.

  5. equality says:

    Since nobody has any idea what their agreement is with Spotify, nobody has any way of knowing of any breaches. Spotify likely got a lot of new users just on the promise of H&M content. Now that wave has passed, they will likely get more users when H&M start regularly producing. I can imagine they have a lot of new listeners just scanning for their content, amongst even the haters.

    • Debbie says:

      @equality: Spot on and exactly! There are lots of people expressing “concern” when they know next to nothing about H & M’s private agreements. I wonder how many of them were expressing the same concern over the 8-year span when Kate did nothing about the Early Years and William did nothing about mental health. To me it’s just a way of having your fingers in someone else’s pockets or finances.

  6. Alexandria says:

    I’m still perplexed why the British Media is obsessed with HM. If it’s about money, they really could stop covering HM easily and do all the actual scandals about the royals everyday even if they can’t cover Nonce’s trial. I’ve concluded that somehow they are addicted and they have some brain infection.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      @ Alexandria, yes. Their brains are infected! Plus, I would love to see this supposed evidence that they have. I doubt that it’s highly unlikely that Spotify put out an offer for someone with these specifics, “ show team that will build and launch a new original show with Archewell featuring the voices of high-profile women”. Why would Spotify clarify it to be for Archwell specifically? That would draw in everyone and their cousins!

    • Amy Bee says:

      @Alexandria: I’m with you. According to the British press, Harry and Meghan are supposed to be irrelevant but they keep talking about them.

    • Jais says:

      Obsessed and want to see them fail. I mean if they fail they have to go back right? Obv, not happening. Also, a lot of these writers know Meghan and Harry hold them in contempt and that they’ve essentially made the whole world think their reporting is racist and unhinged, which it is. Add in the DF lawsuit and a lot of these people very much want to make the sussexes pay. So they will never stop gleefully looking for ways to make the couple look bad. I mean they’re just making themselves look more and more unhinged to the world but they just can’t seem to help their petty little hearts.

      • Shawna says:

        Sounds right – H&M, after a long time of being abused through the press, lifted the lid on what the BM is doing, and the reporters took it personally…. so even beyond the cash-for-clicks, there are press people with absurd and dangerous personal vendettas.

    • Bren says:

      Harry and Meghan’s podcast will create content for the British media to analyze and write about once it starts. They are desperate for any kind of content from the Sussexes and that’s why they’re obsessed with this Spotify deal. It’s the only way they’ll get somewhat regular insight into Harry and Meghan’s thoughts and opinions.

      If the British media weren’t vultures and nitpick everything Harry and Meghan do from every angle, Harry & Meghan may have put out new and regular content by now. Perhaps the Spotify deal was announced prematurely before the logistics of what they would produce was fully planned out and that’s the reason for the slow start.

  7. Jay says:

    So…they are going to have talented people on their side to help them produce podcasts? I’m embarrassed for the DM that they put this in print. Does their news organization typically not look to hire people who have qualifications and experience to work there?

    I guess if the the “gold standard” is nepotism and yesmen, hiring professionals is worthy of comment, but to me it elevates Meghan and Harry that they are not trying to do everything themselves.

    • Couch potato says:

      Given the BS they’re writing, top class journalists are clearly not a priority! Hiring and searching for the best must be unfamiliar to the rota and we all know they’re not used to the RF hiring professionals with knowledge of how the real world works.

  8. Aurora says:

    Meghan had a baby and they both were on maternity leave for a good portion of 2021. Didn’t it take the Obama’s a couple of years to launch their podcasts?

    Also Archewell only hired a production head a few months ago.

  9. Couch potato says:

    I’m not in the industry, but in my experience using the biggest platform to advertise for experienced personnel is quite natural. It’s benefittial for both Spotify and Archewell to reach as many as possible to get the best people. As for the “Spotify has taken the production into it’s own hands” – again, I’m not part of the industry- but I asume Spotify has studios and production equittement at hand for various podcast producers they have agreements with. I also asume use of these things are specified in the agreement between Archewell and Spotify. Sounds to me that this is a non story the rota is desperately trying to make into a H&M failure.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      You’re right.

      Okay, my computer is acting wonky. Apologize if this ends up being a triplicate-minus the link.

      The Hollywood Reporter did a story December 15, 2020 about the Spotify deal. It’s stated in the article that Spotify owned studio Gimlet will produce the show in partnership with Archewell Audio. It also says the series is(was)? expected to be released next year-nothing definitive. I have the feeling the British Media took that to mean 1/1/2021.

  10. Cessily says:

    Maybe they can find a polyp while there at it also…🙄🙄🙄

  11. Nic919 says:

    They need to focus their energies on the ones who live off tax payer dollars and take years to come up with five questions. Or what about that research centre ?

    • JT says:

      This is the real problem for the BM despite how many times they try to tell people how popular, glamorous, and interesting Dull and Duller are. They just aren’t productive enough nor are they compelling enough for royal watching. Even though the Keens aren’t that exciting, if they were just working consistently, the RRs would at least have something to talk about. The rota are starving and little appearances here and their aren’t cutting it. The rats are literally out here talking about H&M’s lawn and digging through corporate filings trying to find anything to bring up the Sussexes. Eden or Dampier was on twitter wondering when H&M were going to make an appearance this year and the majority of royal podcasts heavily feature Sussex content, more than the other royals.

    • Harper says:

      Yes, when is the Fail going to start giving us photos of Kate’s research center for kids who want to grow up good at KP? They’ve got a pic of Wood Farm up already today but we’re still waiting for a glimpse into Kate’s center.

      • Lorelei says:

        I’d bet my firstborn that Kate’s “centre” is going to be like the Cambridges’ foundation— only really existing on paper, not an actual separate physical space with its own staff or anything. They’re always purposefully vague when they make those announcements, so that when they inevitably fail to follow through, the hope will be that people don’t even really notice.

      • Dee says:

        You’re right. That Broomcloset of Keen ain’t going to promote itself!

  12. eb says:

    It’s almost like the reporters have to do some actual research, to you know, report. What a novelty for a Daily Fail ‘reporter’. Of course is at most 2 sentences, so there is still loads of room for delusion and hatred, a la the norm for a Daily Fail reporter.
    I wonder how these reporters stomach themselves at the end of a day’s work. What lies do they tell themselves. Either they are as delusional as what they write or they end up at the bottom of some proverbial bottle the blur away their actions of the day. Sad.

  13. Amy Too says:

    I wonder if any of the delay had to do with Meghan’s pregnancies. She lost one pregnancy and I’m sure needed time to grieve. But what if the original plan was to start work on the podcasts after that baby was born? That would push things back by several months bc of the miscarriage, the grieving time, and then the new pregnancy/birth/parental leave time for Lili.

    Plus we’re still in a pandemic. Maybe they wanted to do a lot of recording at home, but don’t want people coming into the house when they have vulnerable littles at home.

    Or maybe the Sussexes are very scheduled, and if something happened to delay Archewell podcasts, it couldn’t just be rescheduled immediately bc they already had other work lined up? So then the podcasts had to wait until they could get put back on the schedule?

    • Couch potato says:

      Both the pregnancies and the pandemic are good reasons why things might have been delayed. We’ve also heard they wanted to produce a series for children about historical women for Netflix. It wouldn’t surprise me if they choose to combine the Netflix release with a Spotify series about strong women. Maybe interviews with women living today working in the same fields as the pioneers, and build around that. It would be a win win for Spotify and Netflix to have related series which are mentioned on each others programs. Meghan seems like the kind of person to think ahead and we’ve seen how she’s launched fully finished projects before.

  14. JT says:

    I wouldn’t take any stories about how Hollywood works from the Daily Fail. They know nothing. If this was coming from Deadline, Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, or hell, even TMZ I would be more inclined to believe it. H&M have hired some big names for Archewell Audio, with one of the ladies being an award winning podcast producer. Rebecca Sananes produced podcasts for the New York Times and she was hired by Archewell last year. The BM is really scrapping the bottom of the barrel for stories about H&M and they seem more desperate for content than their actual fans. I expected some podcasts in 2021, but I think this year will be the year they start getting into gear. With IG, the Netflix doc in it, Harry’s memoir, and whatever else they have cooked up, this year would be the best time to drop the podcast so they can build on all that momentum.

    • L4Frimaire says:

      I wonder if they were planning on releasing content in 2021 but if they were delayed with the trial I don’t the pregnancy. While we have a general idea of what they may be about, we really have no clue what type of content they’ll actually be producing and how directly involved they’ll be. Also, they have a lot they can talk about so looking forward to what they put out once it does come out.

      • Lorelei says:

        @L4Frimaire, they were definitely planning on releasing content in 2021 (see below), but I think this move by Spotify could be seen as a vote of confidence in the Sussexes. In lots of other cases, I imagine Spotify could simply cancel the contract, but they’re decidedly not doing that. They clearly see the value the Sussexes will bring, and will do whatever is necessary in order to work with them and to keep Archewell’s podcast at Spotify.

        It might not look *exactly* the way they anticipated it would when the statement was written in 2020, but absolutely nothing has! The entire world has been thrown by this pandemic. Nothing has been “business as usual” for a long time now, so people in every sector are making adjustments & accommodations. JMO

  15. Amy Bee says:

    This is sad and stupid. The DM is so obsessed with Harry and Meghan that they’re looking for anything to create a story.

    • Becks1 says:

      We don’t know the size of their paycheck.

      And we don’t know the terms of their contract. Do people really think that H&M signed a contract to produce podcasts and just aren’t doing it? With their professional reputations on the line?

      this is only a story because the british media are obsessed and are making it into one. My guess is that they will release podcasts on whatever timeline was agreed to in their contract.

  16. CaliFire says:

    The British tabloids are impatient. To me, this is actually a sign of good. The podcast is coming. One thing I did read that I 100% think is true is that Meghan will be running the podcast show. I’m betting the podcast will be an offshoot of The Tig with occasional spots by Harry. It’ll be something the tabloids will tear Meghan up for and she can easily ignore.

    • Ginger says:

      Where did you read that? I haven’t see that anywhere. The podcast will be run by both of them, I’m betting.

  17. girl_ninja says:

    The British “media” are hankering for any content that they can get from Megs and Harry. Just to hear their voices and nitpick that will keep them jolly.

  18. Colby says:

    While I do find it weird that they did 1 episode then nothing since- the DM is reaching here as usual.

    Spotify owns the podcast. So Spotify is posting jobs for it. I’m confused how this demonstrates they are assembling a team without the Sussex’s or taking control away from them?

    • Charm says:

      LOL Spotify owns which podcast? Every podcast producer owns their podcast and Spotify earns from the revenues generated by said podcast.

      Therefore, its patently obvious that Spotify and Archewell are partners on this particular product thats in development right now.

      • Colby says:

        Oh good point “owns” may have been the wrong word. But my point still stands even if “partner” is the better description of the arrangement – they are partners in the podcast so they are posting jobs for it which isn’t weird so the DM is reaching.

        I believe we are on the same side here so the hostility isn’t necessary by the way.

  19. Charm says:

    So according to the britshidtrag, this came from Spotify:
    “…Now Spotify is hiring producers through its podcast arm, Gimlet, to work with Archewell Audio. The jobs are being offered to applicants on six-month contracts based in Los Angeles. One advert for a senior producer role reads: ‘We’re currently assembling a show team that will build and launch a new original show with Archewell…”

    Now, ask yourself: how many podcasts are on Spotify? A quick google search says 3.2 MILLION! Then ask yourself: how many of these 3.2 million podcasts work so closely with Spotify, such that Spotify is “currently assembling a show team [to] build and launch a new original show with Archewell.”

    Then ask yourself, why? Why is spotify working so closely with Archewell? To me, this sounds like a partnership……Archewell and Spotify are more than just podcast producer and podcast platform.

    Knowing M, or rather, seeing how M seemlessly forms win-win partnerships, this sounds to me like much more than just a podcast producer/podcast platform relationship. Thats the step that the britshidtrag is afraid to take and therefore, refuse to come to that logical conclusion.

    There are no mistakes happening here, peeps. Just the building of longevity and the creation of Legacy.

  20. Teddy says:

    Isn’t this how it works? Once you’ve the concept and a slate of future episodes nailed down, Spotify hires the crews needed?

    • Charm says:

      Um…..no.

      Conceptualizing, creating and producing your podcast; then choosing a host for it and then uploading to spotify is all your responsibility. Spotify then reviews it and decides that it doesnt violate any rules, incl copyright, then it makes your podcast available to listeners. You make your money thru sponsorships, advertising, or plain old asking for donations thru paypal or whatever. Thats how YOU make money.

      Spotify’s has its own business model for making its money. Suffice it to say, the house always wins.

    • Eurydice says:

      Isn’t it odd that organizations that claim to be about informing the public, instead count on the public’s ignorance to further their business?

  21. aquarius64 says:

    The journalism school rejects that are the BM are still butthurt that Meghan’s lawsuit showed them as the disgraces to the profession that they are – and they were humiliated globally. The y want the Sussexes to fail as payback instead of learning how to be professionals.

  22. L4Frimaire says:

    Is this something the UK press is thinking about everyday? The Sussexes obviously have something in the works and we’ll get it when we get it. It could be a series of podcasts rather than just one show for all we know. Anyway, I’m actually enjoying this Sussex silence. The only people they’re obligated to discuss this with are their business partners. The UK press only has air and speculation to write about. They seem more desperate for a podcast than we are and are starting to lean on Spotify.

  23. Amy Bee says:

    The people most eager for this podcast are the British press and the royalists. So much for Harry and Meghan being irrelevant.

  24. SourcesclosetoKate says:

    Beacause they are narcissists and Meghan is their scapegoat and what you’re witnessing is a smear campaign on a world stage. Really a lot of those people are racist or right leaning or have self hate issues and think blaming others will make themselves likely to tow the line and be “good”. It was reported Meghan hate has grossed 3 million dollars so theres a sick sadistic market for this. And also some are monarchist and this throws anti-monarchists a distraction, I’m sure the royals are thinking better her then us.

  25. Lorelei says:

    The Fail is trash but I don’t think it looks great, either- ONLY because the public was told the first season would drop in 2021 and it never did, so by January 2022, Spotify is stepping in. I know Archewell hired a great person to head up audio, and the pandemic has fcked *everyone’s* schedules, but I do believe Spotify expected more by now.

    But, imo, regardless of the reasons, Spotify was not thrilled that 2021 passed with nothing. This isn’t bashing the Sussexes; they’re crazy busy, had a baby, and also had to deal with Meghan’s ongoing lawsuit. They have a ton going on and they just didn’t make as much progress on the podcast as expected, it happens to everyone—but clearly Spotify still wants to work with them, and think they’re valuable enough to invest in. JMO

    • Sid says:

      I don’t recall seeing any official statement that the first season would debut in 2021. Did that come from Spotify or Archewell? I see in the article that the Daily Fail is claiming this, but I really don’t remember that.

      • Lorelei says:

        @Sid this is the third time I’m replying to you, I’m so sorry!, my comments keep getting eaten, maybe because they contained a link? In case that’s the issue, it was in Spotify’s original press release— I won’t include the link this time, but this is the relevant paragraph:

        “Ahead of the new year, Archewell Audio and Spotify’s Gimlet studio will release their first offering; a holiday special hosted by The Duke and Duchess that will feature stories of hope and compassion from inspirational guests in celebration of the new year. In 2021, The Duke and Duchess will produce and host podcasts that build community through shared experiences and values.”

      • equality says:

        All sorts of companies have announced things that were delayed due to the pandemic. Is the DM breathing down all their necks?

      • Charm says:

        @Lorelei
        Just to remind you: when Spotify said: “In 2021, The Duke and Duchess will produce and host podcasts that build community through shared experiences and values.” this means exactly what it says.

        The production & hosting process took place in 2021. Producing and hosting podcasts is not what spotify does. Podcast owners are responsible for finding a hosting site for their podcasts before uploading to spotify.

        Now that 2021 is over, we can assume that H&M (Archewell) has banked enough podcasts to be able to start presenting them in 2022.

    • Charm says:

      @Lorelei
      So, you know the adage: ‘if the premise is false…” .etc.

      You said:
      “The Fail is trash but I don’t think it looks great, either- ONLY because the public was told the first season would drop in 2021 and it never did.”

      The public WAS NOT TOLD that “the first season would drop in 2021.” Thats such a blatant falsehood. Go back and listen to their brief advt, dropped on Dec 15, 202 to preview their Dec 29, 2020 Podcast.

      • Lorelei says:

        @Charm, I am not relying on the DM, which I thought was clear in my comment, but if not I apologize. The Fail is only going by what Spotify said in their original press release about working with the Sussexes. Why don’t *you* go back, Google it, and reread it before jumping to conclusions.

        LI tried posting the link here numerous times and it didn’t work, but please do not call me a liar, especially when you don’t know what you’re talking about. You could have just clarified politely, like @Sid did, about where I’m getting information from instead of just jumping all over someone and being so nasty.

  26. MsIam says:

    A tale of two couples: the big story on the first couple is whether they will decide to move to yet another oversized house. Oh and one of the partners has just discovered neutral colors and colorblocking. Amazing! The other couple is working on an animated show for Netflix, producing a podcast, will hopefully be producing an international sporting event this year and probably has various and sundry other projects that we know nothing about. Now tell me which couple is irrelevant again?

    • Lorelei says:

      @Msiam, honestly. They’re beyond scraping the bottom of the barrel for Sussex stories at this point.

      You guys know how a while back, some British journalist tweeted (and then quickly deleted it, but people have screenshots) something like, “I can’t wait until we can report what we REALLY have on Prince William?”
      Well I’m dying to know when that time is. After the Queen passes away? After Brexit is finalized and Bill can no longer rely on that EU “human rights” (🙄) law? If not, then when? Because at this point I think they’d make a lot more money breaking scandals about Bill than they do by constantly repeating the same (false) crap about the Sussexes over and over and OVER again.

      I feel like even if I couldn’t stand Harry and Meghan, I’d be so sick of their repetitive nonsense by now. (Which seems to be happening at least a little bit, judging by all of the callers this weekend with their responses to that right-wing nutjob live on the air on his radio show, lol!)

      • SourcesclosetoKate says:

        That’s the thing, if they’re going to release false stories why not do it on Kate and Willie…unless it’s that they get paid under the table to be protected, in which case I hope tax payers feel content their money is being used to prop up that useles family than investing in their own childrens’ futures.

  27. Julia K says:

    A person’s past behavior is a good indicator of future behavior, and Meghan has always kept her projects under wraps until she and the product are ready to roll. All the behind the scenes work is done quietly and without fanfare, in contrast to what the current trend is by certain U.K. residents.

  28. Calypso says:

    Ok this is only semi-relevant, but on the icon picture of Meghan for the article (on the celebitchy home page, not the header pic) she has these gorgeous dangling earrings, does anyone have an ID for those?

  29. Catherine says:

    The British media ic continually showing its ignorance. The Sussexes formed a partnership between Archwell Audio and Spotify. They are producers in terms of ideas for content but the actual production work will be done by Spotify. Take a list a the number of people involved in the production of a podcast. Those people will be employed through Spotify. The tabloids know that the Sussexes will be successful their trying to throw dirt on whatever they put out. This is all nonsense to me because the only people complaining are the tabloids. There hasn’t been a hint of any dissatisfaction from Netflix or Spotify. Just like the Delaware filings they attempt to turn everything into an issue. They clearly had no sources at Netflix or Spotify since they are searching through job ads for information.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Yes. Since from the beginning of the announcement, Spotify owned Gimlet studio, is the producer of the podcast/partnership with Archewell.

      You’re right @ Catherine. Any hints of dissatisfaction are coming from out of the loop sources.
      So be it. The Duke & Duchess of Sussex would not be suprised by this kind of mis/disinformation by a British tabloid that Madame Duchess just won (again) a case against. The case was never against her but them. Curious not having seen much coverage of..Lord Rotmore now has 85% ownership of the DM/Mos. He has more control/power than he did before. The DMGT is no longer publicly traded. We’ll see what happens. I have my doubts.

      There are jokes to be made if Netflix/Spotify were working with the Cambridges. imo

  30. Ginger says:

    The British press spoke to Spotify last month and they said big things are coming regarding their podcast so I hope that means soon. I was one that was expecting a podcast episode last year but I have no idea what their deal is with Spotify. I looked at Michelle Obama’s podcast and she released a bunch of episodes from July 2020 to September 2020 and only 1 podcast last year in April. Harry and Meghan have a multi year deal with them so maybe they have a certain deal with how many episode they put on in that deal. No idea. I just hope we get one soon. I loved their holiday episode. They could have recorded a bunch of episodes in the fall and will release them over a few months this year. Hopefully. This was the deal I was most looking forward to. I love podcasts and I think they will do a good job. I waited over a year, I guess I can wait a little bit more…

    • norah says:

      we are all waiting for the podcasts but if you look and see – meghan also had a baby in june 2021 and we are still having a pandemic. wish people could be more understanding instead of critisizing

  31. ferdinand says:

    They perhaps just thought it’d be easy to get some money from whoever they could get it from. Like my college classmates who thought they’d be podcasters get money from sponsors and after episode one, not seeing results they just quit.

    Of course Harry and Meg would got deals and sponsors and big money just by being born in the right family. He’s royal after all, whether or not he’s “resigned” to his royal life.

  32. Chelsea says:

    Spotify co-produces podcasts for many of the shows on its platform including the Michelle Obama podcast which didnt come out until a year and a half after the deal between the Obamas and Spotify was announced. If you look at job boards from any major streamer of podcasts, tv shows, etc you will often see them listing names of shows that a potential hire could be working on. Try as the tabloids might; this isn’t news.

    Until I hear any grumbling proporting to be from Spotify or Netflix in an actual relevant trade publication like Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, or Variety I’m not even entertaining these stories. Archewell Audio’s head Rebecca Sananes started in September 2021 and she’s probably worked the last few months on slate, content, etc and now they’re finally ready to record. That’s it.

  33. ABritGuest says:

    The press got the job ads from Meghan & Harry hate accounts. Showing how the British press coordinate with trolls as Bot Sentinel’s report proved. Also shows how hyper focused the press & trolls are on Harry & Meghan when the royals they pay for are begging for attention. They clearly want content to mock & disparage- the lack of visibility by Harry & Meghan appearances must be killing these trolls.

    Spotify announced there would be archewell podcasts in 2021 but as some have mentioned if you look at the Obamas’ Spotify deal it took over a year from date deal was signed for first podcast content to be released. Spotify announced a number of deals around the same time as the Archewell one & I don’t think content has materialised for any of these yet so.. who knows maybe Spotify agreed to rejig release schedule for their new podcasts. https://podnews.net/article/missing-spotify-shows

    The tabloids don’t understand the content business as they seem to think H&M should have released a Netflix project by now when they only signed a deal in September 2020 & only had first project greenlit in April 2021. They need to leave it to the experts who know about production & keep to reporting on royals who never set a foot wrong or the most prestigious environmental prize ever etc.

    It’s crazy that the royals that the press should be holding to account escape this scrutiny or don’t face these expectations . They literally all happily reported that Kate had been working on her early years work for 10 years despite little evidence of this & that the culmination of this 10 years of listening & learning was a basic survey & announcement of more research. Yet they expect Harry & Meghan to have produced a Netflix film/series & Spotify podcast within 12-16 months since they signed those deals. When during that time they’ve settled into a new home, had a baby & been setting up their organisation.

  34. aquarius64 says:

    The US press is picking up this story but it’s being straight forward for the most part.

  35. Jeremy says:

    Spotify said a full slate of shows would be dropping in 2021 and we got nothing. Realistically this is embarrassing and they have no one to blame but themselves. If people are making podcasts in their basement Harry and Megan should take some of that 18M they got from Spotify and start recording. People think Megan is interesting and has good things to say, she could have done a whole interesting mini season. And Harry could have done something cool with veterans or something. Duchess Doolittle seems to apply to both SIL now ….

    • MsIam says:

      What cave have you been living in to think that Meghan is Duchess Doolittle? She wrote a book, co-chaired a vaccine drive, worked with an advocacy group on paid parental leave, oh and did I mention she had a baby too? With a high risk pregnancy thrown in the mix? So the only ones who should be embarrassed are the media and their troll patrol!

    • swirlmamad says:

      You can stop your trolling right now with that “Dolittle” nonsense in regards to Meghan — we don’t do that sh*t here.

    • norah says:

      last time i checked the sussexes arent taking any taxpayer money from the uk. its a deal between them and spotify and netflix. its always so easy to spot the trolls

    • tamsin says:

      @jeremy

      JUST Duchess Dolittle? Is Meghan the only one who signed with Spotify? The Sussexes have a lot on their plates. They obviously have not been lolling around their pool doing nothing. It seems they have been extremely busy. Perhaps there has been a delay in production, but to suggest that they haven’t met their commitments is just not fair.

    • Yinyang says:

      She can do as little as she wants because she’s not taking money from the public unlike duccess dolittle. Do you understand that! That is the main difference between duchess dolittle and Meghan, that’s the freedom you get when you are a private citizen, you can live the life you want on your own conditions because you are not taking from the public, you don’t have to answer to anyone and certainly not the public. She can live the rest of her days twidling her thumbs if she wants because she doesn’t have taxpayers to answer to, so the public has no right to question her.

      If you wanted public assistance right now you can walk into the welfare office and apply for it. First they’ll ask how much your income currently is, it must be lower than the minimum required amount (which is not a lot just enough for necessities) and you have to answer honestly or you can face jail time. Then you have to provide proof of income and claim assets if you have any from bank statement and records. Then you have to provide why you can’t work and evidence that you have searched. If you are accepted then you have to answer these questions on a monthly basis unless of course you are the royal family who seem to be above the law in the most grotesque way.

    • @Jeremy. The title “ Duchess Doolittle” is patented, copyrighted, and owned solely by the dull and lazy Kate M. You are insulting your idol by vesting her title on someone who clearly doesn’t deserve it at all.

  36. Julie says:

    I just read in the Variete e-magazine that the producers are the same that did their podcast 2 Christmas ago. Its seem to be part of their agreement. I guess they are at the production stage.

  37. molly says:

    So a private company signed a contract to pay private citizens a bunch of money to do a thing? And that thing hasn’t been done yet? Guess who doesn’t get to complain about that? The public!

    It’s not like a tax-funded entity who is “owed” a return on that investment. Nor is it a charity organization who is suffering from a lack of attention or action. Am I disappointed that the podcast hasn’t produced more than one episode? Of course, but Harry and Meghan certainly don’t owe ME anything.

  38. SUNNYVILE says:

    lol the fail keeps proving that old saying that HATERS ARE YOUR BIGGEST FANS! I don’t think any sussex fan is as much desperate for their content as they are😂imagine scrolling through Spotify’s job listing just to make up this story!!!
    That said I get the confusion with their podcast because H&M haven’t announced any timeline or scheduled releases so everyone must’ve assumed that they’ll release the 2nd special or new episodes the following year! I too thought we’d get more episodes by now but I guessed that they’re behind because of Lili’s birth(parental leave) & will probably release it sometime this year🤞🏽