Tominey: ‘The more Meghan Markle speaks, the less anyone wants to listen’

Shortly after George W. Bush won reelection in 2004, his advisor Karl Rove spoke to a reporter about the sort of alternate reality the administration believed in. Rove said, “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities…” The idea of “we create our own reality” has been an article of faith for the American fascists in the Republican party ever since. I bring this up because the British media believes the same thing. When something is happening that they don’t like, they simply create a different “reality” for their readers. Say, when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are successful, instead of acknowledging those successes, the British media simply creates the narrative of “everyone hates them, the Sussexes are failing, they can’t do anything right.” Even when there’s empirical evidence of Harry and Meghan’s successes, you can find the British media executing their Alternate Reality strategy. No one seems to realize that information is global now? It’s weird.

All of which brings me to a lil’ column written by Camilla Tominey in the Telegraph. Tominey was the first person to falsely report on the Duchess of Cambridge’s “tears” at the bridesmaid’s dress fitting just before the Sussexes’ wedding. That’s who Tominey is, someone who gets leaks from Middleton Manor. In the face of the overwhelming success of Meghan’s Archetypes podcast, Tominey wrote a column called “The more Meghan Markle speaks, the less anyone wants to listen.” Archetypes was #1 in seven countries within 48 hours of the surprise release of the first episode.

If the Sussexes really wanted to be helpful, they would surely abandon Prince Harry’s autobiography and write a textbook on economics instead. In these testing times for household budgets, the couple could prove invaluable as the perfect case study for both the theory of inverse proportionality and the law of diminishing returns.

What better way to teach school children these most basic of mathematical principles than by studying the post-Megxit era?

Inverse proportionality might be defined by the dictionary as “related so that as one becomes larger the other becomes smaller”. But I think it is probably more easily explained by juxtaposing a graph showing the growing frequency with which Harry and Meghan have criticised the Royal family with their approval rating.

Look children, the more the couple have slagged off the Windsors, the less popular they have become!

Meghan’s latest podcast couldn’t be a better archetype, pardon the pun, of the law of diminishing returns, either. It is a theory in economics that predicts that, after some optimal level of capacity is reached, adding an additional factor of production will actually result in smaller increases in output.

But isn’t there a simpler way to put it? The more the Sussexes speak, the less likely we are to listen. That’s something even a primary pupil can understand.

I appreciate that there are a multi-million reasons why they keep on coming up with this stuff. Meghan’s 60-minute me-fest is currently top of the Spotify charts. But the trouble with word salad is that it does tend to give most people indigestion.

[From The Telegraph]

Keep in mind that Tominey is a regular on the British chat show circuit and a regular on week royal roundtable discussions, plus she obviously writes exclusively about the royals for the Telegraph. Her whole business model is talking about the royals and reporting on the royals and analyzing the royals. But for Meghan to… have a successful podcast, which is #1 in multiple countries, that’s suddenly a bridge too far for Tominey? “The more the couple have slagged off the Windsors, the less popular they have become!” – O RLY? Because I’m pretty sure that their Oprah interview was one of the most-watched interviews of the last decade. I’m pretty sure that Archetypes dethroning The Joe Rogan Experience is a big f–king deal. I’m pretty sure that Tominey wouldn’t be writing snitty little columns about Meghan unless the Royal Rota was completely terrified that the alternative reality they created and nurtured was coming crashing down on them.

Photos courtesy of Spotify, Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

76 Responses to “Tominey: ‘The more Meghan Markle speaks, the less anyone wants to listen’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Snuffles says:

    To quote Jay Z. “Men lie. Women lie. Numbers don’t”. Archetypes is Number 1 in 10 countries and countries. The only people having trouble digesting this is the Royal family and British media, and I hope they all choke on it.

    • Lolo86lf says:

      I hope the British tabloid demons get severe gastroesophageal reflux disease all the way up to their throats.

    • CheChe says:

      Call out the engagement numbers louder for the people in the cheap seats!

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Right @Snuffles. Numbers don’t lie(re: Archetypes popularity) unless it’s a paid for poll (approval ratings). The BRF/BM are obsessed with approval ratings and their paid for polls to come to a desired result. If anything that Tominey was alluding to was actually true, she wouldn’t need to incorporate her own ‘word salad’ regarding ‘inverse proportionality’ and ‘the law of diminishing returns’.

      The reality is that the Sussexes are popular. The BM/BRF work hard/spend money to hide that. Normal regular working people recognize and appreciate that they are working-and not on their 4th taxpayer funded home-no one believes W&K are privately funding it themselves. Who gives an actual f*ck that the Sussexes popularity might be low amongst royalists. Royalists are not the majority on a global level. Or a Commonwealth country level.

      Tominey was interviewed on Rachel Johnson’s(gag BoJo’s sis and nasty to Meghan) podcast re: Difficult Women in June, 2021. Then in December 2021, Tominey appeared on another podcast: Women with Balls. Apparently, speaking out on these topics is okay if you’re white. Especially when a WOC’s numbers eclipses your numbers and global interest. Here is my rubbing alcohol soaked handkerchief to wipe away your fragile /false tears. I’m trying to be less violent by not saying slide down a razor into a pool of alcohol. Ooops, I said it.

      I will wager that any of the charities promoted by the Sussexes and Sussexsquad have been concerned about ‘diminishing returns” or “diminishing returns”. I’m only one person and have donated $700 over the last two years to their charities (WCK was a big one). Tominey and the rest of them need to check their selves. Camilla T., do you really want to discuss mathematical principles? Or, maybe Cambridges patronages that have shuttered due to them being completely ineffective Patrons? Grrrr…stop now. Thank you @Kaiser about the Alternative Reality strategy info. Most of us have seen it in play. Good reminder.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Eeep…correction…*have NOT been concerned about ‘diminishing returns’.

        I’m guessing, based on Tominey’s words, she doesn’t want her daughter or son to have ambitions or goals. That whatever her children want to do, should be in support of the BRF/monarchy. Their lives should be in servitude to an asset rich family that came out of the “right” birth canal”(puke). Just like their mother.

  2. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Tominey and her ilk try to speak their will into existence. You’re right, it’s about trying to force reality to bend to their will. They know MAGAts and many Brexiters will follow right along and take up the talking points, unable to think for themselves. An uneducated and/or racist and/or nationalist populace is a mentally and physically enslaved populace.

    • Both Sides Now says:

      @ ThatsNotOkay, can we also expand on the Repugnant’s history of cutting programs for those less fortunate and basically their apparent🖕🏻to all that are devastated as well.

      I bring this up due to this garbage that Tominey Camel Toe wrote:

      “If the Sussexes really wanted to be helpful…write a textbook on economics instead. In these testing times for household budgets, the couple could prove invaluable as the perfect case study for both the theory of inverse proportionality and the law of diminishing returns.”

      Shouldn’t she be directing her vile towards the Lambrigdes and their meager 4 “cottages” homes as citizens of the UK struggle to feed themselves? Shouldn’t she be looking to THEM as they are the ones who are directly effecting the lives of actual British citizens???

      My gawd Tominey…enough already!!! Your vile, insipid, continuous rages upon Meghan, and Harry, have become the stuff of delusions and unhinged “realities” that don’t favor well for those who are truly suffering.

    • cindy says:

      Excellent! Absolutely brilliant in exposing Tominey lies, propaganda, hypocrisy…

    • B says:

      You know @ThatsNotOkay with Tominey I think its more basic than that. People like CT only have a job because the royals refuse to speak for themselves or hire PR/Spokesperson to communicate directly to the world like normal celebrities. As a result the rota rats and other “journalists” get leaks and have carte blanche to write or say anything. If the royals start speaking for themselves or engaging with the public through statements from a spokesperson then they are out of a job.

      Its why someone who earns a living talking/writing about royals could write with a straight face that no one wants to hear from the royals themselves. Of course the public would but once royals start talking who wants to hear from Tominey?

      Lol frankly she’s right to be concerned. The royals copy EVERYTHING Harry and Meghan do. Its only a matter of time before they start copying the Sussex press strategy. Unemployment and irrelevance couldn’t happen to a nicer group of people.

  3. Noki says:

    This might sound petty but i really want people to dig dirt on these insufferable rota rats and report it somewhere, like twitter and see how it feels. But of course UK journalists private lives are probably protected.

    • ELX says:

      CT herself is not interesting; she’s just a hustler trying to get paid. A bird dog running to pick up her master’s game.

      I am very interested in the mechanics of how these types get paid. How they work websites and social media platforms to enrich themselves and their corporate masters. All of this is calculated to generate clicks and revenue and I work really like to know the details of this business model.

      • Noki says:

        I also have no clue, the slightest i will pretend to have is that i thought they get paid by word count. Maybe that’s why they churn article after article on the slightest sneeze the Sussexes make. I don’t think they make a ton of money and that’s why they also pop up on social media, morning shows etc

      • Both Sides Now says:

        @ ELX, I want then to pull back the curtain in this country of Oz. Who is pulling their strings to write this vile garbage!! I would be willing to bet my beloved car to find that it leads directly to CH as well as Lambrigdes house of inept and unqualified….

      • SarahCS says:

        Yet again, if someone wanted to follow the money this would be absolutely fascinating. Who is paying and in what way for what output, beyond their official contracts, etc. We know there’s a web behind it – not to get too tinfoil tiara but there’s a whole lot of quid pro quo as well as hard cash.

    • EllenOlenska says:

      Most “journalists” of a certain age (along w tons of their younger colleagues) are being put out to pasture as the profit model shrinks. I suspect the rats have just latched onto a model that helps them keep paying their bills…no matter who it damages.

    • Debbie says:

      @Noki, that’s not petty at all. And this Tominey person fails to notice that she’s contradicting herself by paying attention to Meghan by reporting on her latest endeavor. Tominey is not only “listening” avidly to anything Meghan says or does, but she writes breathlessly about it when she really doesn’t have to because (and I’ll say it loudly for the BM again) Meghan has left your country, she’s in America, why are you so intent on following up on what’s going on with this American woman?

    • Joey 🦘 says:

      Noki. I don’t remember where but I SAW pictures of that decrepit old whyte photographer (we tried to talk to Meghan 3-4X) . The others in the press pack we talking abt him watching porno. Much more.
      I’m enjoying all the comments. Blessings

  4. Alexandria says:

    Maybe they shd take their own advice and stop talking and writing about HM? OH THAT’S RIGHT THEY DON’T WANT TO STOP.

    • Colby says:

      This this this!!

      If she’s soooooooo irrelevant, why are they devoting multiple articles to her? 🧐

      They could absolutely just ignore her. That is an option. But they just refuse to.

      • Debbie says:

        As Omid Scobie said about the number of articles the BM churn out about Meghan: “So far, it’s 16 and counting.” He gets it.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Exactly @Colby. They have a CHOICE. to not talk about Madame Duchess’s podcast. Not talking about it doesn’t earn them clicks/engagement numbers. It is very obvious that their engagement numbers go up when the Sussexes are involved in their articles. If the Sussexes/Meghan are sooooo irrelevant…..they need to explain the why of their CONSTANT writing of them/her


    • Christine says:


    • JDMyrick says:

      If she did stop writing/talking about HM, her bank account would start with zero and end zero. She’d have to get a real job.

  5. Emmi says:

    “But the trouble with word salad is that it does tend to give most people indigestion.” Yes, Camilla. It sure does.

    • Becks1 says:

      Right? that article is nothing but word salad.

      As an interesting note – someone in a post last week linked an older CB post, and I ended up reading a few CB posts around the time of the India/Bhutan tour. Kate was being DESTROYED by the British press. I remember Emily Andrews being salty after that tour, but Jan Moir (hateful racist person I know) was also destroying her and then I was reading this article that was making fun of everything from Kate’s clothes to her accent (saying you couldn’t even understand her) and I was shocked when I realized that was from Tominey.

      It seems to me that she was promised some exclusives in return for backing off Kate, and it worked.

  6. BuzzKell says:

    don’t these people get the message? The idea of hanging on to so much bitterness and hatred towards Meghan just ages people in the worst way, just look at Khate.

  7. Denise says:

    Amazing quote. Meghan has literally taken over Joe Rogan as the most popular podcast. No one could do that for a long long while. And she did that with no promotion. If you don’t count the “promotion” that screeching RRs are giving her

    She’s an absolute queen and whatever she touches is success

  8. C-Shell says:

    #CamillaTomineyIsALiar is trending yet again. She has some nerve referring to Meghan’s podcast as word salad! Her twisted analogies are mind bending. Or maybe I just need more coffee. Archetypes is still running hot in many countries, including non-English speaking markets, and the podcast with Mariah Carey will be dropping any time. I can’t wait.

  9. Miranda says:

    Can you imagine expending THIS amount of energy in hating someone? I can’t, and I’m a petty bitch who revels in nursing a grudge. It’s just INSANE. How can a person be this angry at someone who has literally no effect on their life whatsoever? Jesus.

    • Eurydice says:

      I don’t think it’s about grudges or about anger – Tominey is a professional hater. And Meghan has a profound effect on Tominey’s life – she’s her meal ticket.

      • JDMyrick says:

        By writing about the podcast, CT is actually promoting it; best part about this, neither Meghan nor Spotify paying her. She big mad.

      • SURE says:

        Meghan outed CT’s lie about what really happened at the bridesmaids’ dress fitting which would have bruised her ego slightly. For that reason I do think that CT might now feel she has a score to settle with M.

  10. Zen says:

    The rota rats constantly say the Sussexes “slag off the Windsors” when in fact H&M have said very little about the Windsors. Other than clearing up a few things on the Oprah interview and a few other mentions, they’ve said nothing in 2 years. If the rats are to be believed from their 20 H&M tabloid stories a day, they speak of them constantly when they don’t. Alternative reality indeed.

  11. Cel2494 says:

    Oh boy, these people are exhausting. Clearly everyone even them want to listen to Meghan cause her podcast is #1. Numbers don’t lie 😂

  12. Mina_Esq says:

    They keep bringing up this “Meghan talks about herself, no one cares” thing. Meanwhile, people care and listened because they wanted specifically to hear her perspective and experience.

  13. YeahRight says:

    And yet she had the number 1 podcast in Britain and many other countries. They love to act as if they don’t care but at the same time set the notification for when her next podcast episode drops.

  14. equality says:

    It makes me wonder if this woman is actually enough out of reality to believe her own nonsense. The sad thing is that there are plenty of gullible people who will believe her while at the same time rabidly following any news about Meghan.

  15. eb says:

    CT is an adult mean girl. How bizarre.

  16. Jais says:

    Right? I like that Kaiser points out the logic. CT talks about Meghan all the time too, so by her logic, she should be experiencing diminishing returns. And yet she too still talks without fear that the more she talks the less people will listen. The only one who needs to worry about that is Meghan.

  17. Eurydice says:

    Have the Middletons run out of talking points?

  18. SugarHere says:

    “The growing frequency with which Harry and Meghan have criticised the Royal family” is nothing compared to the British gutter media harrassment the Sussexes are being subjected to. Besides, Tominey is lying through her rotten teeth since there’s no constant repetitive pattern objectively indicating that Prince Henry and Duchess Meghan have engaged in systematic lambasting and debunking of the Palace.

    The only thing growing in frequency here is Tominey’s and some well-indentifiable members of the media establishment’s bitterness, jealousy and heinous attacks on two successfully self-reliant and emotionally prosperous individuals whose very existence far from the madding crowd of idle melanin-hating grifting annuitants, has become a problem.

    So let it be an unsufferably painful problem to the gang of mental patients who hit the keyboard (Camilla Tominey, Angela Levine, Pierce Morgan…) because Henry and Meghan aren’t going ANYWHERE. Meghan Markle is a bi-racial (suck it up and please, please, choke on it) Princess of the United kingdom, Henry is a duke by title and blood right. They will NOT be intimidated into silence or divorce, neither will they be tunneled into a wall: Harry and the love of his life are here to stay. Meghan is Harry ‘s choice. Harry is Meghan’s choice. Meghan and Harry are the world’s choice. People do love them.

  19. Nic919 says:

    Tominey is part of an insular crew who stupidly believes that what they say matters outside of that island. She is unknown outside of the Uk and even with the Britons who don’t read tabloids. So she is writing for her audience of bigots, but it’s not as expansive as she believes.

    The Cambridges are in for a rude awakening if they come to the US having believed that what the rota states as what the rest of the world thinks.

  20. girl_ninja says:

    Tominey is consumed by Meghan’s very existence. Obsessed with every move she makes to the point where she will make up lies just to write/talk about Meghan. What a dark, disgusting walk through life. Doesn’t Tominey have a podcast by the way?

  21. Steph says:

    I’m not sure why it wasn’t mentioned here bc it feels really relevant, some of the countries that she hit #1 in are the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. The white countries of the commonwealth. The people she thinks she speaks for.

    But let’s talk about word salad. I’m what world does that column make a lick of sense? She admits (to a point) that Archetypes is topping the podcasts charts but claims no one is listening? They tuned in for ep 1 but won’t continue?

    This site’s head writer is a huge tennis fan. I’m not. I know more about Serena than she’s one of the best athletes to ever do it largely bc I read here. I’m not alone in that. Yet, look at the audience this drew. Next week she has Mariah on. Mariah can post a pic in a grubby red tee in July and say she can’t wait for Christmas and go platinum yet again. Does Camel Toe really think her listeners are going to go down?! Make it make sense!

    • CheChe says:

      CT is writing for the oldsters that only read print media and trust the old standards. Meghan’s numbers don’t lie like Cameltoe.

  22. kirk says:

    Is Camela T the one with the hots for Prince Andrew?

  23. Gabby says:

    I love how telling the truth about the Windsors is “slagging off” on them. Truth hurts, so push the lie. It reminds me of when they were pushing the “Meghan will work with Kate on a Netflix project” tall tale – e.g. Meghan needs Kate’s help. As if.

  24. Over it says:

    I think I a am really slow, I mean I just read Camilla the lying toad words and I still can’t make head or toes out of it. All I got is that this Racist B is big mad and jealous of Meghan is number 1 on Spotify in 10 countries.

  25. Rapunzel says:

    The more Meghan speaks, the less anyone wants to hear these predictably ridiculous rants about her from the Royal Rota. FiFY, Cammy.

  26. aquarius64 says:

    Camilla and the other rota rats think the world is stupid and will believe anything they say. The majority of US media don’t bring these idiots on our air because we Yanks got wise to them. The most I’ve seen on US TV is Omid Scobie. Camilla is bucking for a damehood.

  27. Amy Bee says:

    It’s like they expected the podcast to flop and when it didn’t they just went ahead with their old headlines. Having listened to the podcast, it wasn’t a me fest nor did Meghan slag off the Royal Family. If the press really wanted Meghan and Harry to become irrelevant they would stop talking about them but they can’t because that’s where the money is.

    • equality says:

      Even if it had been Meghan talking about herself the whole time, what difference would it make in this woman’s life? Whatever content they put out only has to meet Spotify’s specifications, and not hers. She’s not employing them.

  28. Noor says:

    They love to distract the peasantry with this nonsensical obsession with all things Meghan.

    Why don’t they focus on William leaving Tax payer financed Kensington Palace extravagant apartment/mansion vacant for occasional use instead of returning it to Crown Estate to rent out. Or lets talk about the slimmed down monarchy, should income of one the duchy be returned to the treasury as the number of people King Charles will be supporting will be greatly reduced.

  29. Izzy says:

    I see Cameltoe Tominey is projecting again…

    • Mary says:

      LOL, @Izzy. Instead of “Look children, the more the couple have slagged off the Windsors, the less popular they have become!” Tominey should have said:

      The more the Royal Reporters slag off the Sussexes, the more popular they become.

  30. Owlsyn (all hail Queen Meghan) says:

    Three of four generations from now, history will remember Duchess Meghan for the positive impact she made on the lives of so many, with both her words and deeds, as she stood against a literal ocean of venom, bile and hatred.

    These reporters might be footnotes in that history, but they won’t be paragraphs.

  31. JMoney says:

    No one should be surprised at this. The RR are The Windsor’s non official PR. They know they can never make W&K palatable/on part with The Sussexes so their PR strategy is to oversaturate the UK media with biased negative stories on H&M that everyone including H&M fans are sick of hearing about them. To their credit, it has worked to a degree. Many ppl notably blue check twitter who were fans of H&M esp post H&M interview have been conspicuously quiet this year with any news pertaining to H&M. This is intentional b/c many are sick of getting trolls in their mention that they decided to avoid H&M altogether

    • Brit says:

      No it hasn’t worked. Maybe in parts of the UK but even then Meghan and Harry are still big draws there. Her podcast reaching #1 in places In Australia, where the media is also bias against her, tells them it’s not working. If she’s so hated, why is she continuing to win and be successful even in countries where shes supposedly “hated” if anything I see more pushback against the media then Harry and Meghan because everyone can see the difference in treatment especially in regards to the Cambridge’s. The reason they keep obsessing over her is because nothing they have done has been successful in actually hurting her.

    • Camila Tominey should apply the principles of economics to herself and the rest of the rota rats (eg. Dan Wootton, Angela Levin, Lady Campbell, Rebecca English, Katie Nicholls, Piers Morgan, Jan Moir, etc.). The poison that they write about daily is the perfect case study for both the theory of inverse proportionality and the law of diminishing returns.

      • Debbie says:

        Pretending to offer economic advice to someone who’s far wealthier than you, and someone you hate even though you don’t know them. Isn’t that the very definition of concern trolling Camila? Also, their obsession with Harry’s upcoming book continues unabated I see.

    • Kels says:

      Why are you so obsessed with whether or not blue checks are tweeting about them? There’s literally a whole bunch just today. There’s still a whole bunch in the UK that are still talking about them and defending them..but there’s also some really significant things going on in the UK right now. The government is in shambles.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      JMoney, they may not comment to rid themselves of the trolls, but that doesn’t mean they’re not listening to the podcast and will buying Harry’s book. That can’t be controlled by the brf or bm. That’s also why H&M will continue to be successful. I think what they need to be more concerned with is how many of those individuals are in the UK and no longer read their newspaper or articles. Talk about diminishing returns.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Disagree@JMoney. That may very well be the intent of the BM/BRF. It’s not the truth. The Sussexes have a greater amount of supporters than naysayers. How many of the ‘blue checks’ you seem to be concerned about are UK affiliated over globally known. P.S. RR’s need to be excluded. Their sh*t has stunk for the last six years. Sheesh…Tominey wrote a dumb@ss article about the Sussexes water situation. She out and out lied about speaking to the ‘water board’. She did not. Tominey never checked with the Sussexes about the crying story (or other stories). She wrote what she was told to write. She didn’t fact check anything. Ever.

      Pisha!!!!! Last July the BM/poll f*ckery tried to claim that Prince Pedo was more popular than Harry. Really? The BM really wanted to convince people that Andrew, good friend of a dead pedophile trafficker of under age girls and best buds of Ghislaine, another trafficker of underage girls, someone that lol was privately funded to payoff at least 12 million to settle a lawsuit was more popular amongst the UK public than a royal that served 10 years in the army, and fought the Taliban and whose only “crime” was stepping down from royal duties? and not being taxpayer funded anymore. Out of curiousity, who are the blue checks you’re talking about?

  32. TheOriginalMia says:

    Camilla should realize what she’s saying about Meghan is the very thing most people feel about her. The more she speaks and rants about Meghan, the less people are interested in reading her stuff. Hence, why these salty ass RRs keep using Meghan’s name for clicks.

  33. Marilee says:

    Look children, the more the Cambridges have slagged off the Sussexes, the smaller the Commonwealth has become!

  34. Marilee says:

    Look children, the more the royal reporters have slagged off the Sussexes, the less our credibility has become!

  35. sammi says:

    Sorry, I cannot comment because I am laughing too much as I guess Meghan is too!

    Ferengi emoji here.

  36. L4Frimaire says:

    I literally have no idea what Tominey is talking about in those excerpts. None of what she wrote makes any sense. Bitter much. Lord, Meghan is rolling a tide over them and they won’t be able to come up for air.

  37. Feebee says:

    I need a bottle of Pepto-Bismal after reading her column.

  38. Well Wisher says:

    It is so easy to …
    Too easy to…
    First ‘snowflake’; followed by ‘woke’ not a new one since 2012 ‘word salad’.
    They have the language backed up by arms.
    Black America has the dialect, or this is an acknowledgement that it is an actual living culture, so necessary for our survival.
    They have to columbus and bastardize it.
    Always in our joy.
    As to Tominey’s impression of Meghan….
    This is the first time I have actually paid attention to anything she has ever said.
    After a minute, there is an urge to move on, but I must admit that I am not her intended audience.

  39. QuiteContrary says:

    Camilla doesn’t even know what a pun is. But she must know what a joke is, because she is one.