Roland Mouret: Princess Kate is ‘powerful… I design with her in mind’

There was a fascinating interview with Roland Mouret in this past weekend’s Sunday Times. Mouret is French, but his fashion line was British-based for years and years, and his designs are beloved by many British women. During the pandemic, his business suffered and he had to close his label and fire all of his staff. But like a phoenix rising from ashes, Mouret has returned with a new business partner (Self-Portrait’s Han Chong) and a new, more affordable line. The business part of the interview is fascinating to me, but the piece is getting a lot of attention because Mouret talks about Kate, the Princess of Wales. Kate wore an older Mouret dress to the summer premiere of Top Gun Maverick, and it marked a big moment for Mouret’s fashion comeback. Some highlights from this piece:

His change in perspective: “Femininity can be strength now. The non-gendered situation of our time obliges us to redefine femininity. She can wear a pair of flat boots with a sexy dress now. She can have a split to here,” he gestures to the top of his thigh, “not because she wants to become an exotic attraction to the opposite sex, but because she thinks, ‘It’s my body, I do what I want and I like my legs and I show them.’”

He’s focused on doing selfie-friendly necklines and introduced peek-a-boo cut-out details. “In my past, I could never have done it,” he says, because his older customers would never wear it. His new, younger customers will lap it up, along with his signature wiggle dresses in shorter hemlines. “They say it’s younger, but it’s really Mouret — they like it.”

When Kate wore Mouret: When the Princess of Wales recently customised one of his old designs — a black column dress with a white off-the-shoulder band — by taking out the back zip, he was thrilled that they were thinking along the same lines. “She represents the way a woman grows, the way a woman stands not behind but beside. That sense of equality she has created — she’s powerful,” he says. There’s an orange short-sleeve dress in the collection that he casually refers to as the Kate dress. “I design with her in mind,” he says. “It makes me feel proud to be able to do things that can help her. To make things that she feels protected in at that moment when the world is looking at her, I’ve done a little part in protecting her.”

His Gallic vision: “There’s an 1980s Parisian attitude. I’m getting back in touch with my French soul… In England you have an aristocratic culture and the only way you can destroy that is by being eccentric. In France the bourgeois is destroyed by the seedy. It’s something we mix.”

[From The Times]

His comments about Kate were a lot nicer than Alessandra Rich’s comments about Kate wearing her designs. But that’s the larger problem with Kate’s style and her relationship with fashion: Kate genuinely likes Rich’s fussy, frilly, ruffled, peplum’d, puffy designs. That’s Kate’s true style, very ‘80s and overdone, with no wink or humor. Meanwhile, Kate *should* want to lean more into the Mouret style – body-con, well-constructed, with an eye to a minimalist silhouette. Mouret isn’t designing with Kate in mind, he’s designing stuff which he hopes she’ll choose and which he hopes she realizes will complement her look. Meanwhile, Rich is explicitly NOT designing for Kate and that’s the sh-t Kate gravitates towards.

Photos courtesy of Dan Kitwood / Avalon, Backgrid and Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

51 Responses to “Roland Mouret: Princess Kate is ‘powerful… I design with her in mind’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. kelleybelle says:

    Powerful? With what? How? Huh …?

    • Polo says:

      Lol he’s got product to sell.., he’s gotta kiss ass somehow lol

      • Julia K says:

        Exactly. My first thought when reading this was big time ass kissing. He must really be desperate to beg in public for her attention.

      • goofpuff says:

        I’m sure he’s sending her all the free stuff he can convince her to wear. I’m sure she’s getting plenty of kickback as well. He is desperate and needs the exposure for his comeback.

      • PrincessK says:

        Exactly, I don’t believe a word of it. People like that selling their designs will say anything but the truth.

    • Josephine says:

      He dresses her like a child or matronly. No one sees powerful in what she wears.

    • WHAT says:

      At least someone has her in mind. We all know that her husband don’t.

    • Lux says:

      Powerful, eh? The Turnip Toffs beg to differ…

  2. equality says:

    “She represents the way a woman grows, the way a woman stands not behind but beside.” Um, don’t all the Kate stans praise her because she “knows her place” and walks behind PW unlike the awful Meghan? He is designing with peek-a-boo cut outs, high splits and shorter hemlines and thinks he’s designing something Kate would wear? She does have the figure that designers seem to want their dresses displayed on and that’s all I can see for him designing “for her”.

    • Blitznik says:

      It’s called following protocol. What’s wrong with following the rules?

      • San Diego says:

        Again with the picking and choosing when it suits you. Was she following protocol when she walked in from of the Queen, William, Harry or other family members?

      • equality says:

        Fail to see where I made any comment about the supposed “protocol” which primarily seems to exist as a cudgel against Meghan and isn’t even real. However, if Kate wants to dress in conservative styles that is her option. My comment was about the designer being ridiculous and clout-chasing by trying to claim he designs for Kate when his own words indicate designing things she doesn’t wear. As for the “walking behind” thing, if it’s such big protocol why do KC and his consort seem to ignore that fact?

  3. Macheath says:

    Here in the U.K. the press is predictably spinning it as “Meghan’s favourite designer is influenced by Kate.”

    Meh, I think he gave a good response to be honest. Generous and magnanimous sounding but actually very sycophantic and with an eye to sell to her unhinged fanbase. I’m just never ever going to compliment an unrepentant, malignant racist narcissist like Kate. No matter how good she looks in a dress. It unnecessarily legitimises her and minimises the serious harm she actively engages in.

    • C says:

      I figured they’d crow about “Meghan’s favorite designer” saying this about Kate.
      I guessed they missed the memo that *nowadays* Meghan is the “epitome of Dior elegance”. 😁

  4. Harper says:

    Um, all this praise for taking out a zipper? He must not know that a zipper is not as valued as BUTTONS in Kate’s world.

  5. Cessily says:

    Funny how people project nasty mean bullying people as being powerful, being a bitch and a bully isn’t power.. a bitch and a bully is just that and usually intimidated by others who are smart and confident in themselves so they try to destroy it.

    • purplecupcakes says:

      She’s definitely intimidated but she’s just too stupid to realize that she has all the tools at her disposal to be smart and confident.

      • Cessily says:

        I don’t think she has the desire to change, even though you are right she has unlimited resources and tools at her disposal.

      • SussexFan says:

        My mom keeps saying about Kate: that girl is getting thinner and thinner.

  6. Cathy says:

    “Powerful”

    Did Google Translate mess up and give the wrong word? What was he trying to translate from French to English so he could describe Kate?

    And why did Kate have the back zipper removed from that dress? Her alterations on expensive clothing confuse me. Was she sewn into it? We know she likes her clothes to be tight fitting but that is extreme. If so then we probably won’t see this dress again as a rewear?

    • Eurydice says:

      The original design had a visible (silver?) zipper going down the back past the hips and a sheer panel across the back below the white collar and to the waist. The zipper was changed to be invisible and the sheer panel was replaced with solid fabric. This made the dress much less adventuresome and much more conventional. I’ll admit, I would have done the same thing, too. I hate big shiny zippers.

  7. Becks1 says:

    LOLOLOLOLOL. Powerful? when she wears his designs they get a lot of attention, and his designs ARE good for her, but powerful???

  8. Bettyrose says:

    He lost me at “femininity is powerful now.” Dude’s talking like he only just discovered women are human beings.

    • Alarmjaguar says:

      Right!?

      And then he followed it up with this nonsense: “It makes me feel proud to be able to do things that can help her. To make things that she feels protected in at that moment when the world is looking at her, I’ve done a little part in protecting her.”

  9. Brassy Rebel says:

    Kate has created a “sense of equality”? What the hell is this guy smoking?

  10. Mary Tosti says:

    Ahahahahahahahah. This guy is obviously trying to be funny…. right?

  11. Amy Bee says:

    Hmm…I seem to remember when people liked when Kate walked behind. They said it was royal.

    • C says:

      The official statement is “she understands the protocol”. Except when she walked in front of the Queen those times, I guess.

  12. Peanut Butter says:

    I really like that black column dress and think she wore it well. There’s my one nicely truthful comment for the day 😂

    • goofpuff says:

      Kate does look good in the dress. The hair and makeup I don’t like styled with the dress. The combination makes it look pretty boring. Not really fashion for a red carpet look.

  13. Tina Loman says:

    She has power until he has no use for her. Power ha ! Her power is mostly mean girling. As for the dress I know many liked it, but I thought it was plain. The only Roland Mouret I remember over the past couple of years is the blue one Meghan wore three times with the hat earlier this year at the Jubilee, the grey one that was similar, and the blue sparkly one that I really liked when she was pregnant. The Alexandra Rich dresses are awful Kate wears, but that black and white Roland Mouret meh. I forgot she wore it. She doesn’t walk beside she walks behind.

    • kelleybelle says:

      I thought the dress was a little too severe, and the hairstyle also. It seemed to emphasize her poor melting face. The woman she took part in trying to destroy, she secretly admires?

  14. aquarius64 says:

    Meghan’s go to’s for fashion these days are Valentino, Dior, Carolina Herrera, Oscar de LA Renta. When she wears their clothes they post on their social media accounts and keep it moving. Times must be tough for Mouret for doing this suck up piece on Kate, to show that a royal is wearing his designs.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Meghan still wears Mouret. She rewore her blue dress, the one she wore the day before her wedding, to Trooping this year.

  15. tamsin says:

    What a bunch of word salad. I didn’t understand a word of the excerpts here. What the heck was he talking about?

  16. Shawna says:

    Fascinating, that contrast between Brits leavening aristocracy with eccentricity and the French leavening the bougeoisie with seediness. I always saw eccentricity as a mark of the aristocracy specifically because they CAN afford to ignore norms, not as an internal departure from it. It’s a flattering description, just like his feminist fantasy of Kate.

    I still have to admit that was an amazing look on Kate (if a little worrisome about her potential health issues).

  17. Candy says:

    They padded her hips in that dress to give her some shape. I did not like the white band on top. It just did not look right, though Mouret is a great designer imo.

  18. Michele says:

    I just wish she’d buy some powder.

  19. Jen says:

    “Mouret isn’t designing with Kate in mind, he’s designing stuff which he hopes she’ll choose and which he hopes she realizes will complement her look.”

    Except he literally said he designs with her in mind.

  20. Pumpkin (Was Sofia) says:

    Kate is not just a client but a high profile one. So yes he is going to be very complimentary towards her because he wants her business and exposure. And even if he is being genuine about it all, well okay. That’s how he feels.

  21. Beverley says:

    What a brown-noser! I thought that Kate’s black & white dress was too severe for her face. It really emphasized how bad her skin really is, and how haggard and homely she’s become. Hateful Kate isn’t aging well. Yet she’s only 40. Yikes! 😳 She will look like a gin-soaked, pickled train wreck in 10 years. There’s only so much Botox and fillers can do.

    Karma is a grown and sexy beeyotch and Kate’s getting the unattractive face she’s earned.

  22. Catherine says:

    The look was very 90’s to me. Too severe. And I agree with an above commenter who said the severely straight hair did not compliment her face. It was laughable when magazines tried to compare it to Meghan’s black and white strapless jumpsuit with the cut out bow back which was so fashion forward. As for Mouret. It would have been so easy for him to compliment her on the look without the oh so false over the top propping up. It’s interesting that it seems impossible for people to speak about either of the Cambridge’s without either insulting the Sussexes or pretending the Cambridge’s are more than they actually are.

  23. Noor says:

    Well, well. Life is hard when designers have to go around mouthing platitudes out of touch with reality

  24. Poppy says:

    Did someone pay this designer to say that? Yes. The woman doesn’t speak unless it’s on a teleprompter, she walks two steps behind Will, etc. Femininity. Surely this guy is paid. Lol

  25. February Pisces says:

    Whilst he’s ‘thinking of kate’ Kate is thinking of meghan. Everything she wears is a cosplay of her , so he should really thank meghan.

    I think that KP and the media are desperate to get more people into embiggen kate so if he can provide a nice embiggen quota about Kate and he gets some free press in return. Their bribes are so obvious.

  26. sparrow says:

    Is he looking for the word “powerless”. She has no personal umph or professional force. I never think much of his design and this black and white dress looks like a cheap stab at Julia Roberts’ vintage Valentino gown. You can tell a dress is bad when it does nothing for the wearer. Her hair looked greasy and her skin looked awful. Probably to do with the fact she wasn’t with her favourite photographer but not helped by the dress. When these photos came out, she looked so frail, I thought Tom Cruise was helping someone elderly up the steps.

  27. AllBlackEverything says:

    Great, femininity is only allowed to be powerful now because non gendered people who hate science have made it okay when it literally has ALWAYS been powerful.

    I love this era of men being allowed to define women, womanhood, femininity and all the things that make us woman like women didn’t spend their lives dedicated make this NOT a thing.

    Cool, Roland.

    And on top of that you are out here trying to make KKKhate the bastion of all of this when she clearly hates every female that’s not her mother.

    • Snoodle says:

      I am honestly not sure Katiebot DOESN’T hate her mother…there is an awful lot of rage in her, and while some of it may be directed at herself I am fairly certain a good portion is directed at the person who literally raised her to seek out the hell Kate now lives in.

  28. LRob says:

    Mouret has been a good friend to Meghan for years and frankly I’d imagine she was very sad to see his business go under. I have no problem with his quotes here, as he rebuids his business.

  29. jferber says:

    How is she powerful? By marrying the “right” man? She is not powerful. Her strongest quality, besides, malice, is broodiness, which go together nicely and so well.