Queen Camilla rejects Prince Harry’s claims that she’s used him for her PR

Prince Harry has dragged his stepmother a lot in Spare. Harry’s biggest qualm about Camilla was that Camilla was happy enough to use William and Harry for her own PR. Harry wrote that he “did not know how to feel about the idea of having a stepmother who, as I thought, had sacrificed me on the altar erected by her PR.” To be clear, he’s also talking about grudges on William’s behalf, since Camilla was caught up in a notable snafu where her office leaked details about her first meeting with Prince William, who was a teenager at the time. Well, of course now-Queen Camilla would never deign to correct the record formally, that’s why she still employs former tabloid editors to do her dirty work for her. From the Telegraph:

The Queen Consort did not leak a story about the time she first met Prince William to a newspaper, royal sources have insisted. The Duke of Sussex uses his memoir, Spare, to accuse his stepmother of leaking stories about her first private conversation with the teenage prince to the press.

The accounts contained “pinpoint accurate details”, he writes, “none of which had come from Willy, of course. They could only have been leaked by the one other person present.”

However, the details of that meeting were actually leaked, inadvertently, by Camilla’s own private secretary, who was eventually sacked over the incident.

A royal source said: “Harry has created a very crisp narrative which in parts is a conflation of different versions of stories.”

The Queen Consort, or Camilla Parker Bowles as she was then, was said to have been “furious” when she discovered that details of her first meeting with William had been leaked. She had told Amanda MacManus, the top aide who she had hired shortly after the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, about the 1998 meeting. Mrs MacManus told her husband, a media executive, who in turn was said to have told a former colleague, who told a newspaper. Camilla took the unusual step of releasing a public statement, announcing that Mrs MacManus had “resigned” following an investigation. It said: “Mrs Parker Bowles agrees that her position had become untenable.”

South African-born Mrs MacManus, a mother of two, had worked three and a half days a week for Camilla. She was later reinstated, going on to work as her private secretary until just last year.

[From The Telegraph]

I barked with laughter at the last line. “How dare you suggest that Camilla leaked the information, the source was her employee, and Camilla fired her… (and then hired the employee back and the same woman has been working for Camilla for decades since then).” In any case, Camilla WAS THE SOURCE. Harry was absolutely accurate – Camilla got drunk and she was telling everyone about her meeting with William, of course it made its way into the papers. Besides, many people think that the Amanda MacManus incident was just a cover story for the larger machinations by Charles’s office. It’s not *just* that Camilla leaked sh-t about Charles’s sons, it’s that Camilla and Charles worked in concert to leak about Harry and William whenever it was convenient to them.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images, Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

84 Responses to “Queen Camilla rejects Prince Harry’s claims that she’s used him for her PR”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Tessa says:

    Is Camilla going to deny she partied with Clarkson and never protested about his offensive article.

    • Noki says:

      It seems Camilla is only for herself. How quickly she forgets how awful the press was to her.

      • Eleonor says:

        She actively gaslighted the wife of her lover for years, does she think the people don’t remember?

      • Andy Dufresne says:

        There’s a reason why Diana called her the Rottweiler.

        The Jeremy Clarkson article along with photos of her lunching with these POS is clear proof of Harry’s claims. It’s out there and so clear!! Why is she denying it and people are giving her the benefit of the doubt. Haven’t we all remembered what happened in the Diana years?!?!? It’s like all that stuff was swept under the rug.

      • harpervalleypta says:

        Oh she remembers very well how bad the media were to her. Her response wasn’t to go after the media; she instead decided to sic the media on OTHERS so she would get better PR.

        She took, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em” to an extreme conclusion, not only joining them but hiring and partying with them.

      • Gabby says:

        If you and someone else are swimming among sharks, make sure the other person is bleeding.

      • Nomnom says:

        for her shitty layabout son too, don’t forget how Harry was thrown under the bus to suppress that story.

        Wonder how many of the royal stolen jewels will get handed over to Cam’s kids.

      • Tessa says:

        Camilla had people in her corner early on like penny j u n o r who wrote Charles victim or villain in effect the first Diana bashing book. This was back on 1998. Penny is a great pal of c and c.

    • I believe Harry about Camilla! says:

      I believe Harry about Camilla, the woman is evil!

      • Mary Pester says:

        She could make cruela deville look like a Saint. She haunted and hunted Diana ALL through her marriage to Charles, and of course she had her back pocket paps leaking stories about harry and meghan. Harry had to go in her eyes because he is so much like his mother. William, the two faced snake sold his mother out by calling her paranoid, when all the time he has been working hand in glove with this horrible old woman to get the most popular couple out of the family and out of the UK. Think about it, look at how beautiful Megan is, think of how popular she and Harry are, now, stop and think just how popular THEIR children would have been. Bi racial beauties and so popular that the keens wouldn’t have been able to stand it

  2. Noki says:

    These people are just made different. I just can’t fathom some of these things, maybe extreme money and power just makes people operate in unimaginable ways. I CANNOT begin to grasp how a Father and Brother would leak stories against their blood.

    • Chloe says:

      What i got from the book is that charles is extremely insecure and therefore loved the praise the press gave him… even if that was at the expense of someone else.

      And william well it’s clear that he was incredibly competitive and jealous. So if leaking is going to give him better press over his brother he will.

      I also think that if you grow up in that environment you genuinely think: well it’s how things work. And don’t care. Especially when you are on the end of positive coverage.

      • NotTheOne says:

        There’s a great twitter thread with reactions from psychologists who’ve read the book. A lot about how Harry dealt with trauma and that it was lingering under the surface until he met Meg. But also about how William is insecure and more damaged than Harry (the only thing making hm “special” is the title, etc.) And that Camilla has been hurt badly in the past and uses that hurt to justify hurting others.

      • Lucy says:

        I’m at the part in the book where Harry is in the military and about to go to war. He was looking forward to war because it would keep the press away from him. That’s how much he hated the press.

    • Mrsfonzieface says:

      This is my end point with all this too. There’s people are just made different. Rampant attachment disorders, which the press plays into. It’s sad, really.

      • harpervalleypta says:

        The BRF is supposed to be an example of the perfect British Family. It turns out they are a great example of a family dealing with generational trauma.

        Harry certainly isn’t perfect, but good on him for saying during the Colbert interview, “It ends with me.” Not just with the media, but being affectionate to his family, making his family relationships matter to him, even becoming a hugger (which I’m sure has sent shudders down the spines of the rest of the BRF.)

    • Deering24 says:

      Money and power are all these folks are raised/taught to value. It’s one of the many reasons F. Scott Fitzgerald noted that “the rich are different.” They live in bubbles where real world concerns don’t really intrude—or are handled by others.

      • Emily_C says:

        Stephen King said something about that too. That he knew the rich now because he was stuck hanging out with them a lot, and that they’re awful. I can relate; I went to a fancy private college (scholarships) until the social scene there drove me to have psychotic breaks. The girls weren’t too bad — most of them tried, at least, even if they were clueless. 9 out of 10 of the boys, though, were misogynistic, racist, almost unbelievably spoiled alcoholics-in-training. Oh and most of the professors, no matter the gender, had no boundaries when it came to students, which means a large chunk of them pursued students sexually.

  3. Tessa says:

    Camilla grinning at one of Diana’s grandchildren gives me the shivers.

  4. Laura D says:

    Nope! The woman lost me when she had that lunch with Morgan and Clarkson and then didn’t put out a statement condemning “that” article. She’s allegedly an advocate of DV and at the time of writing she has “leaked” not one word of condemnation. As many have said (myself included), she got away with it with Diana but, she’s not going to find it so easy smearing H&M. Far too many people were around the first time to let history repeat itself without a fight.

  5. MoBiMom says:

    Posted this yesterday as well: hasn’t Camilla been publicly “credited”, in several books, with bringing Mark Bolland on board and devising this strategy to rehabilitate her image and build acceptance for her relationship with Charles? Didn’t Harry and his brother call him Blackadder because of this? Didn’t Bolland write a tabloid column under that name? Part of the gaslighting is pretending that things that were on the record years ago, are shocking new revelations from Harry’s book and therefore highly suspect. It’s just revolting.

    • Betsy says:

      I’ve followed the royals for about thirty years (gah) and that’s always been one of the things I’ve found weird – there’s absolutely no consistency in rules or stories or anything. It takes advantage of the fact that many don’t obsessively follow the whole thing. One year X is the narrative, the next year it’s Y, the year later it’s Z and you’re crazy if you ever thought X was the case!

      • New.Here says:

        @BETSY – same, I’ve been following them for 30ish years too. It’s like they want us to forget who Camilla really is and what she is capable of. I’m not very smart, but even I know that she’s told lots of lies, thrown anyone in her way under the bus, and was conducting an affair with a very married man (Charles) while she was also married.

        She will do whatever it takes to get what she wants.

  6. Amy Bee says:

    The aides don’t leak without the approval of their principal so Camilla did leak about Harry and William.

    • Becks1 says:

      Exactly.

      And here we know that was definitely the case because the woman was reinstated!! the firing was performative only.

  7. Tessa says:

    Camilla was quoted in the international press she could use a drink after the meeting. So how did the media get the quote then. Camilla never refuted it for all these years.

  8. DouchesOfCambridge says:

    Im happy 25 years of PR to restablish her homewrecker nasty mistress reputation will backfire and bring her back to square 1 just before the coronation. So close but so far. 😂

  9. Asp says:

    Oh my goodness — never complain, never explain?? “Camilla never leaks stories, says a Royal source”.

  10. Chloe says:

    You would think that harry had well and truly blown the cover on royal press relations the windsors would chose a different modus operandi

    • Myra says:

      Right? Who cares what a royal source says, she needs to deny it herself. Not like we’d believe her anyway…

    • Becks1 says:

      It’s kind of funny, right? They’re still using these “palace sources” even though Harry has made it clear that the palace sources are just…..the palace.

  11. Brassy Rebel says:

    The other night, Anderson Cooper was showing clips from his Harry interview during his CNN show, then discussing them with a panel which included Max Foster, CNN’s royal correspondent. On the subject of Camilla, Foster did not question her role in these leaks. However, he did point out that Camilla does nothing without the explicit or implicit approval of now King Charles. Foster said that Charles was the “driving force” behind Camilla’s rehabilitation campaign. Just so “Pa” doesn’t get off scot free. And her secretary just happened to be married to a media executive. Convenient.

    • Naomi says:

      Yes, this is something that needs to be underscored. Is Camilla vile? yes. Is she wholly culpable for selling out Harry (& william)? No–her father did it too. And honestly Cam would not have done it if Charles was against it. So Charles is *entirely* complicit in all things Camilla-related. You are the company you keep; Charles keeps permanent company with Camilla, who keeps company with Clarkson et al. Charles has a part in this sordid history and ongoing, present mess too.

      behind every wicked stepmother is a shit father.

  12. ThatsNotOkay says:

    To quote Prince Harry, “They keep telling on themselves.”

  13. Maeve says:

    This is what they tell themselves to appease their consciences. They aren’t the ones phoning the papers so it’s not them leaking. But they’re passing on the information knowing how it’s going to be used, or not doing the due diligence to find out who’s leaking and getting rid of them. They’ve created a culture where there’s no consequence for people who sell stories, and actively encouraged it when it suits them.

  14. Noor says:

    Even the sacking is performative since she was reemployed a few days later.

    • kelleybelle says:

      Just like Danny Williams was quietly rehired after likening Archie to a chimp.

      • Laura D says:

        @kelleybelle – it was Danny Baker. I absolutely loved the guy until that Tweet. I actually shed a tear when I saw it. I’ve not listened to one of his shows since. He’s no longer on the Beeb but, as you quite rightly say he’s still a broadcasting career.

    • Jennifer says:

      THIS. THIS THIS THIS.

      “Oh, she was angry and the lady got fired….and then rehired for the same job.” Uh-HUH.

  15. At this point, no one but the crazies are buying what the UK press is trying to sell. They’ve all been found out. Camilla, the public has spoken, you are nothing more than bully trash.

  16. kyliegirl says:

    to paraphrase Harry, if they can’t see how obvious they are being with the leaking of stories, I can’t help them.

    Camilla IS openly friends with all of the editors/owners of the rags Harry rails on about. That write these horrible things about Camilla’s family members. If your friends were writing horrible things/lies about your family members would you still be friendly with them? She is the evil woman the press is trying to make Meghan out to be. They are just replacing Camilla’s name with Meghan’s. Charles is worse because he allowed this.

  17. Lorelei says:

    Well, since Camilla is such a paragon of honesty and integrity, I see no reason why we shouldn’t believe this “rejection” of hers

  18. Eurydice says:

    Lol, try again, Camilla.

  19. Emmlo says:

    Harry is clearly calling out Camilla’s Hand of the Queen, Mark Bolland, multiple times in the book. The William Meeting leak was notable bc she event does it to The Heir but it’s clear there were many many other examples.

  20. Shawna says:

    For a *single* instance of leaking, she tried to *cover* her tracks. This ain’t it, Cams.

  21. Harper says:

    I hope her Clarence House wardrobe room that used to be Harry’s bedroom now oozes with bad vibes. Harry calling her out in the biggest selling nonfiction book ever in the UK is going to haunt her till she dies. Look out for more tossed eggs in the future, Cams.

  22. Emily_C says:

    So Rottweilers aren’t independent. Dogs have masters. If Camilla went off the leash after someone he didn’t want bitten, Charles would yank the chain. But as it is, Chucky gets constant cover and can just sit there whining and pretending it’s because he’s a spineless man in love (misogynistic myth), and attack his servants and pens, and everyone will look at Camilla instead of him. She’s perfectly happy to play this role, obviously — as happy as someone like her can be.

    • AnneL says:

      Rottweilers, when raised and trained properly, are generally sweet dogs. Charles unleashes her and encourages her worst instincts.

      I am not letting her off the hook. They’re both complicit and awful. But he’s their FATHER. It’s shocking that he allows this so he can look better.

      Boy, did his parents do a number on him. Because people, like dogs, aren’t born nasty. Some might have it in them more than others but they are a product of their environment and upbringing too.

      It’s amazing how well Harry turned out, all things considered. It really is. It was his mother, her genes and the love she gave him early in life. That and being left alone (as in not singled out and treated as special the way William was) and given substitute parental figures who actually cared about him.

      • Jennifer says:

        All the Rottweilers I’ve known IRL have been sweeties (ditto pit bulls). Camilla, not so much.

  23. MickMack says:

    Hurt people, hurt people. I think that is a concept many folks here forget sometimes when I go through comments. The royal family has some grave issues, but despite all that opulence, they are still in gilded cages, with existences that guarantee paydays for some very evil folks (men in grey suits as example) in the scope of generations. I have been thinking about the film “The Last Emperor” a lot watching this all unfold.

  24. QuiteContrary says:

    I had to put down my copy of “Spare” for a half-hour after I read the story of Charles and Camilla deciding with a palace spin doctor to portray Harry as a drug-addled kid in order to improve Charles’ reputation and garner sympathy for him as a single dad.

    I was so disgusted and shocked that I needed time to process it. To do that to a teen who had lost his mother … it’s just monstrous. Charles and Camilla should burn in hell for that alone.

  25. Val says:

    I think Harry is an ardent reader of this blog. He used the phrase “telling on themselves” in Spare, and it’s a favorite of describing the duplicity of the institution and media.

    • Jaded says:

      I too think he or his comms people read Celebitchy. He used a couple of other phrases and descriptives in his book that are commonly used here on CB – they don’t come to mind right now (I’m a bit addled today after having a strong sedative yesterday to get me through a colonoscopy).

    • Emily_C says:

      “Telling on themselves” is a common phrase in America. Like Daily Fail and even Daily Heil.

  26. Over it says:

    When I think about chucky and cameltoe, I think that when Satan walks the earth, this is the male and female form he takes . These two are pure evil .

  27. Gabby says:

    Let’s just sit back and watch the love of Charles’ life shit all over his reign. There is nothing he can do about it because he is terrified that she might leave him. Now that Spare has truly pitted C&C against W&K, I keep running out of popcorn.

  28. HeyKay says:

    Well, of course does. What else can she say?
    Big old liar.

  29. Tykarri says:

    I honestly think this woman doesn’t care a sniff about all this…
    She is a shit disturber and I think she is trying to see how far she can push things…
    She has Chucky boy under her thumb (or between her legs if you prefer) and he will never reign her in unless she says something bad about him.
    She has made it to the top spot, what does she care if the Monarchy crashes and burns? She will just slither back to her little hole with her ex and ride out the wave surrounded by the other toffs… She has media in her back pocket and aristocrats in her ranks, this is a woman with no f#@$s to give and a lot of power. I don’t think she really cares about Charles, he is just another toy in her sandbox.

  30. Paulkid says:

    I am not sure if Chawlz fears Cumiller leaving him as much as he fears what she could leak about him, a monster of his own creation. Their great love story was only an attempt to make their adulterous treachery more palatable. One of the perks of having Camilla as a mistress was she allowed him other affairs without much complaint, but you know that ambitious, immoral woman has more intell on him than anyone. Her knowledge of him and vicious nature is what Chawlz rightly fears.

  31. Dee Kay says:

    I am about a third of the way through Spare and am finding it heartbreaking. Devastating. Harry (and his excellent ghostwriter) don’t write things in a melodramatic way, they state facts simply, clearly, plainly. And the plain facts are nightmares. Camilla and Charles are people without honor. That is what I keep thinking as I read. Thry have no honor. None. Harry loves his Pa anyway, that is clear, he needed Charles’s love desperately after Diana died, and Charles was occasionally attentive and affectionate. But what Charles and his wretched mistress did to Harry via the press….C and C are two of the most dishonorable people who ever lived.

  32. TangerineTree says:

    I finished listening to the audiobook, and Harry’s does a superb job of narrating his story. Really, he could have a career in voiceover work.
    He revealed Cam’s viciousness and her work with the tabloids yet only to a certain point. He leaves it to the listener to go discover what is out there. And there is a lot to uncover about this horrible woman who loves to blow things up. That is her default, and she has already sh!t all over Charle’s reign.
    Also, idk if this has been covered (I’ve been off all media while I focused on the book), but Stephen Colbert lost his father and 2 older brothers when he was just ten. He talked about it a few years ago, and it is a devastating story. I was looking forward to that interview when I heard Harry would go on that show. I finally just watched the Colbert & Harry full (38mins) interview, and it is amazing. Many of the comments below are from people who have lost family members, and a few of their comments made me cry.

  33. acha says:

    I just don’t know where to begin.
    * God Camilla is messy
    * Their PR people really think all the attention on QEII’s funeral means Charles should have an enormous coronation with Lying McLiar as queen
    * Did I say messsssy yet

  34. AmelieOriginal says:

    Not sure if anyone has seen the satirical show The Windsors (doesn’t seem so much like satire after reading Harry’s book lol) but Camilla is played as a power hungry and vengeful wife who will stop at nothing to be on the throne. The actress’s depiction wasn’t far from the truth it seems.

  35. Saucy&Sassy says:

    I cannot imagine that reconciliation will come quickly if at all. I’m really hoping that H&M stay home and celebrate Archie’s birthday.

    Chuck isn’t going to get the ratings that he’s hoping for if the Sussexes aren’t there. I wonder if he is doing a big blowout thinking that it will be huge. He just ain’t that interesting.

    May I say, the man is also a clueless idiot? He’s getting a NEW GOLDEN CARRIAGE for his coronation. Well, I hope that someone funds the purchase of dozens of eggs.

  36. Catherine says:

    Tiresome cow. I suppose she will next deny that she briefed the Sun against Diana during her entire marriage. Absolute trash.

  37. j.ferber says:

    Always thought she and Charles were P.O.S. and have never revised that opinion. Never will.

  38. robin samuels says:

    The Murdoch/Rothmere Team is playing both sides of this battle. They knew Clarkson’s article was heading for print when they published a photo of Camilla socializing with Clarkson, Morgan, Dench, and others for a holiday luncheon. The report initially states that Camilla was the host and then changed to state she and others were guests.
    She’s getting sloppy. First, Mrs. Hussey performs random identification checks at an event hosted by Camilla. A black attendee (Ms. N) accuses Mrs. Hussey of discrimination. Mrs. Hussey gets fired, William denounces her behavior, and Camilla remains silent. Within 24 hours, British tabloids convert Mrs. Hussey into the victim. Ms. N receives threats online, and her business goes under investigation. Camilla remains silent. Mrs. Hussey returns to work.
    Being a rocket scientist is not a requirement to know that Camilla is Cruella, and she and Charles are a team. They have placed many bodies on that sacrificial altar.

  39. blunt talker says:

    Camilla/Cruella-makes perfect sense to me-one question-someone needs to ask the royal family why they use so many tabloid reporters instead of reporters like an anderson cooper to make it look like at least they trying to be fair and balance-if they don’t change how they interact with the tabloid media you can be sure people reading Harry’s book will see the connections-palaces sources won’t do anymore.

  40. Mymooniagarden@gmail.com says:

    Why not just have official NAMED Palace spokespersons? That way anything said by any one else claiming “Palace sources” becomes a lie

    • Surly Gale says:

      Because that’s what Harry & Meghan do. That’s why there are no named, official palace spokespersons. And also, because there are likely many, many, “sources”. The maid, the butler, the body man, the dresser, the jewelry keeper, the candlestick maker, they have all leaked at one time or another. Otherwise, how do we know Charlie brings his own toilet wherever he goes. Or that someone else puts his toothpaste on his toothbrush.

      The most damaging stories about H&M HAD to have come from the top, as Harry says. That detail about them offering to give up their titles which was part of the plan for their departure, as an example. H resisted putting to their plan to paper because he didn’t want it to leak because y’know SAFETY FIRST. But it leaked. Harry knows it could only have come from his dad or his brother, because of that specific detail being leaked. Probably also because they were the only ones involved in the discussions.